@theresbeenamixup very good observation, this is deliberately designed to make darren uncomfortable and it works really well, he tries to hypnotise drawkins but he doesnt do it very well, you see not everybody is hypnotizable unless they are out of their comfort zone. also listen to this without looking at the images and you will notice that dawkins is trying to dehypnotise darren who is actually hypnotising himself!!
a way to avoid the problem of simply inventing names and waiting until someone in the audience recognizes it, is if the psychic chooses a person beforehand and then says the name. If that is the case and if someone has seen that happen, the evidence is much more convincing.
I like Darren Brown, he's used his talents for entertainment and this type of thing he could keep to himself. In the know, kind of thing, but he's explaining, exposing it. There doesn't seem a malisciousness about him.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
These poor people are so deceived. They have lost faith in truth and became an easy prey for the spirits of evil to guide them in a descend into darkness. You can almost see the claws of daemons all around them. May god have mercy with their souls for the pits of hell is the fate they can expect. But it is never too late to repent. The way to the light is still open if you chose to open your heart & mind, pray to the lord, atone for your sins then you can hope for forgiveness
@lk3hjduio Maybe you aren't aware but many athiests are former christians who lived with faith but came to see the conflicts between their beliefs and testable reality. Speaking from experience, prayer does nothing.
I went to a 'Psychic' with an ex gf of mine that believed this bollocks and he started going on about a dead grandfather who died quite a while ago, I put my hand up and said yeah, mine died 12 years ago, they psychic said oh he's here with us now, he loved you very much and cared about you immensely. I said really? because he physically and sexually abused me for years. The guys face was a fucking picture! I said you didn't pick up on that did you!? and left the room 'Crying'.
JESUS CHRIST, HIS CATHOLIC-UNIVERSAL-APOSTOLIC CHURCH, SACRAMENTS, THE BIBLE, MIRACLES, HEALINGS, ST. MARY APPARITIONS, MESSAGES FROM HEAVEN, SIGNS IN 2011 ARE NOT A MYTHOLOGY BUT THE REALITY !!!
But when triple pay "was not quite what we asked for" hunting remained as strong as ever providing each player/team writes down their guesses before revealing their answers in the light of a particular set of human arrangements.
@TonyLee1000 It is impossible to live without imposing your will upon others. I live, I must make decisions and act, those decisions are necessarily according with my own understanding or will, and my actions will therefore affect others. There is no way around it. Even if one imagines themself to do the will of god, they are still behaving according to their own thoughts which have been affected by a belief system.
Nothing only exist in relation to something that once was. I.E. I had ten pounds but spent it, now I have nothing left. Emphasis on the word "LEFT", nothing, not a bean.
For something to be reasonable, it must be logical, and if something is logical, it must be reasonable. i.e. If its not logical it cannot be reasonable.
Randomness implies that an event has taken place without a cause... This is clearly illogical.
Chance also implies that an event has occurred without cause... This to is the folly of an idiot.
As you can see, logic cannot be separated from reason.
@TonyLee1000 "Randomness implies that an event has taken place without a cause... This is clearly illogical."
If you knew anything at all about logic then you would see that this is a non sequitur and a bare assertion, a logical fallacy.
It is also absolutely demonstrably false. For instance, virtual particles (*random* vacuum fluctuations) are random. I could list about a million things that are random by the definition of the word.
And it is completely illogical to argue about something you don't believe exits... Arrogance? Only an arrogant moron would argue about something that doesn't exist.
@TonyLee1000 "And it is completely illogical to argue about something you don't believe exits... Arrogance?"
Of course it isn't. Explain this nonsense. If someone told me not to go to the shops because dragons will burn me i would argue that my child needs food and there are no dragons.
It is the one claiming that dragons exist in Sainsbury's who is a moron.
There are no such things as randomness or chance both concept are akin to believing in fairies. Do people really believe that an event can take place without a cause? This is totally illogical, madness.
Derren Brown has got to be congratulated in tolerating a fruitcake like Dawkins. I suppose it pays well, so I'll humor the old git. Evolutionary theory which Dawkins sees as a holy bible is absolute bullshit. When will science have the courage to put this flawed unscientific theory to the dustbin?
@TheLogic1010 Evolution the process of natural selection driven by predator-prey interactions, environmental conditions, intra and inter specific competition and the sharing of common ancestors. Gradual adaption over thousands of years.
Or Adam & Eve, I mean diddnt eve come from adams rib, then they spoke to a talking snake and ate an apple.
Wont be put in the dustbin because there is over whelming evidence to support evolution something you cant say for religion and the bible is not evidence
This is how dumb religious folk are! They dont even know what an atheist is lol lol lol. Part the seas, talk to a snake or burning bush, feed 5000 ppl with a few loafs of bread..... And what does god do today! As Gervais says giving babies aids in Africa! well done god nice one!
so by that logic i can say everyone who believes in science is stupid and point at people who thought that the testis purpose was a weight used to tension the male voice or other stupid scientific theories....or i could laugh at you for thinking the world is flat or that you matter didst exist before your birth and will not exist after your body has decayed... all wrong and all once strongly held BELIEFS within the scientific community
'You're all a bunch of egotistical cunts shoving your individual view of the universe down the throats of others'
But then you go on to say how humans are shit, etc. Which is shoving your own individual view of the Universe down our throats since human intelligence and knowledge is a major aspect when we think of the Universe, nice one mr Hypocrite. Please leave this discussion to the intellectuals.
@MrCardShark101 I think a healthier view would be to see humans as sacred, because, for whatever reason, were the eyes and ears of the cosmos. We and the world around us is real, so its better to try to improve yourself and your surroundings than to just condemn it as a passive, angry observer. For that reason alone, this is sacred. This isn't just some movie; Its real life. To take such an opportunity for granted and with such contempt is just sad.
I fully agree with you and sadly taking this life for granted is a common theme amongst the religious. Some of them tend to see it as the 'test' to see if you are worthy to get into whatever paradise you feel is beyond death. It is up to them how they live their lives but I am going to live mine with the mentality that this is the only time of existence. *As a side note, look up "I think therefore I am" concerning your 'real' assumption, it's an interesting thought.
@MrCardShark101 I think its a test, but the test is whether the dialectic can evolve any further through human beings or not. As for hell, if it were real, a lot of religious people would probably go to it, because such an after-realm would exist through the duality of fear and love. ...and a lot of them thrive on fear.
Shocker, nobody knows the meaning of life and how we got here. So why not just shut the fuck up and live life until anything is proven because until then, you're all a bunch of egotistical cunts shoving your individual view of the universe down the throats of others, whether it be Scientific, Religious or a mix of both.
Humans are shit and we know fuck all in terms of what is out there, the intelligence we claim and the knowledge we think we have is actually tiny in the grand scale of things.
Personal testimony cannot be accepted as definitive evidence purely on the minor fact that people have an innate ability to deceive. Your parents told you about
Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy, both of which you would have regarded as true. This is a classic example of the influence authority figures have and their ability to utilise this when lying.
Actually the argument from authority is a very weak one, if one very important person says something and another says something that conflicts with the original statement then who is correct? They are both authority figures yet one of them must be wrong, hence you cannot trust an argument purely because it comes from an authority figure.
i took a Tarot reading course a little while back and with out fail everyone in the room, the instructor included believed in magic and other such and even though when the techniques are being explained it becomes to abundantly clear that its fake people will simply seem to not notice and rather hold their believe in it as stronger.
Wrong, you said "you can find evidence for God", which you can't. Granted the quotation from the Bible is valid but in a real-life example I don't think you would actually turn to God simply from experiencing the world around you. There is the 'Paley's watch' argument but personally I find this weak. What about someone who is mentally handicapped and cannot conceive the idea of religion (nor much else for that matter) would your God condemn that person for being an atheist?
You can find evidence for God by reading Romans 1. "For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:" - Romans 1:20
Anyway, back to religion; if you were raised by athiests and never came into contact with a religious person nor did you ever learn about religion, could a so-called 'God' condemn you for being an athiest?
So sorry that my literary skills could not match up to that of MrCardShark101, please excuse my ignorance, see it as a flaw in my genetic design for holding of knowledge and/or memory.
Well it is most satisfying that my vocabulary has come to a reasonable fruition, such that others can appreciate it. Unfortunately this will sound somewhat pedantic but I noticed you missed out a full stop at the end of your comment, please refrain from this obscene mistake in future.
Glad to be of service, just wanted to point out the intellectual brilliance of that most enlightening comment, don't thank me, thank you MrCardShark101
I have provoked a response in you, used profanity to hurt you, enforced my views and insulted yours. I have shown you what we atheists are consistently experiencing from religious followers and now you are aware that it does not help anyone progress (quite apt, seeing how religion has a track record of hindering progression. Sorry, couldn't resist). Telling us we will burn in Hell doesn't really give the impression of a loving God, just a thought. I am m
I have provoked a response in you, used profanity to hurt you, enforced my views and insulted yours. I have shown you what we atheists are consistently experiencing from religious followers and now you are aware that it does not help anyone progress (quite apt, seeing how religion has a track record of hindering progression. Sorry, couldn't resist). Telling us we will burn in Hell doesn't really give the impression of a loving God, just a thought. I am m
Doubtlessly, there are the charlatans who profess an ability to 'tune in'. What I personally cannot deny despite the mud that dirties this subject is my own experience that has beaten probability numerous times. Specifically, dreams that outline next-day events exactly. Considering the number of variables in even the briefest of moments, to dream a minute long sequence that unfolds the next day is improbable beyond reason given the principles of chaos. There IS something more that we don't know
The idea of 'good' is relative, thus you cannot call another person 'good' or 'evil' in accordance to your own morals but rather observe if they themselves act in what is considered 'good' in their own form of morality. Hence you cannot say "He is inherently evil" but rather "By my standards, he is evil" but unfortunately nobody gives a flying fuck about your standards.
Mistakes: aethiests, inherintly, bible (capital B, you should know this) and heracy. Read a fucking dictionary.
Atheists are not evil. They are people who look at the world and see that it is unlikely that there is a god, this is acheived by carefull observation of what is. As opposed to being told repeatedly that something is true, as is the case with most religeons. We are also curious, VERY curious.
We are intreugued by things of interest. Derren Brown is interesting, and Dawkins is curous.
@IonizedApple please, please do not attempt to group together people into such a large heading like "aethiest" and saying all are curious. im aethist, sort of agnostic, in the sense that i am certain that the major western religions are wrong, but just becasue their "higher power" is illogical, does not mean one could'nt exist, though i doubt one does. anyways, to my point, i know a lot of aethists that see religion as another authority to rebel against no extra curiosity, just rebelion.
@mikeymoughtin Okay, perhaps I was generalizing a little. Please note that my comment was mainly in response to TheLogic1010 1 and probobly should have put it is as a response.
My own atheism is drawn from scientific evidence as well as my curiosity, not the need to rebel against an unjust authority. That was what brought me to derren brown in the first place. Anyways, as a scientist, it would seem likely that dawkins is of my type.
Why does Dawkins waste his time talking to conjurers instead of doing some real science? Oh he can't do real science must be the answer. Derren Brown, how does one do cold reading down a telephone line? Dawkins accepts the theory of evolution is a falsehood, so spends time away from this fantasy. Good one Dawkins, you don't have to face your critics. Dickie is a bit of a fruitcake, but I suppose a harmless one.
@sonykroket I know about the r mistake, the grammer is correct. You must be a bit of a fool yourself? Your missing a apostrophe between the n and t. You really are a joker!!
Dr Daniel Came, a Philosophy Professor from Dawkins own Oxford University and a fellow Atheist, has called Dawkins anti-intellectual and a coward for refusing to debate Dr Craig. Dr Came himself debated Dr Craig and they had a civil and reasonable debate.
Pussy Dawkins is a coward who would rather debate Ted Haggard, "Banana Man" and Retard O'Reilly than intellectuals. Pussy Dawkins is the Lady Gaga of science.
Dawkins is a weak God-hating sycophant who wont debate serious academics for fear he will be made a fool in front of his pathetic followers. Hes a coward much like his ilk.
@meeefe he is fake as he explains here u moron, he doesnt claims to be psychic he just uses psychological manipulation unlike other that does the same thing but claim to be psychic and have supernatural power for their financial gains.
I don't really see the charm of Richard Dawkins... I've never heard him say anything new or refreshing in any video I ever saw.
Don't get me wrong, I agree with him, but I see him more as a journalist than an intellectual, and with that quite a biased journalist as well. It's all very narrow and his questions are very much steering rather than exploring.
"God" haters are a ridiculous set. Certain people will seek out thought-structures which allow them to hate, to persecute others, physically, emotionally, etc. Human institutions change; human psychology doesn't change. There is an upsetting (and a subtle) symbolic link between the old Spanish inquisitor and a modern day atheist on the offensive.
Good people don't hurt others, whether or not they believe in "God."
People like Dawkins devote their time to non scientific work to avoid talking about his own work, evolution theory? Because it's a fake science bordering on a belief system. Time Dawkins faced the truth, he's been living a fantasy all his life and the reality must really hurt him!
@TheLogic1010 no-one can say what the 'truth' or 'reality' is. You can look for it, and find evidence to support your theory but that is it. Also, people that are heavily involved in science actually begin to see it as a belief system/religion, because it shares many factors with religion as we are familliar with.
@TheLogic1010 "People like Dawkins devote their time to non scientific work to avoid talking about his own work, evolution theory? Because it's a fake science bordering on a belief system. Time Dawkins faced the truth, he's been living a fantasy all his life and the reality must really hurt him!"
It's not that athiests are inherently evil, or even hate religion, athiests simply do not believe that a supernatural Being(s) created the Universe. So please do everyone a massive favour and stop preaching to us all. Perhaps if you had a particularly influential preacher some athiests may be fooled into a religious belief. But trust me, having you as a representative of religion is really not doing your lot any good, mostly because you're a bit of a twat.
@MrCardShark101 Problem with Atheism is that they claim to not believe that "Supernatural Being(s) created the Universe" because there are no facts to prove this. But, on the other hand is there proof that Supernatural Being(s) didn't create the universe either. Never mind the fact that humans have no proof of them even existing! Agnosticism simply states that we don't have proof to back any belief up, in turn stating that we can't know how the universe was created.
@killerdirector ......we (aethist) are not the ones trying to prove anything......so, we don't need proof. proof is only neccisary when trying to prove something, not in the claiming their lack of proof is wrong. like, if einstien said "light is as fast as it gets." and provided no evidence, would people then have to believe him until eventually we made a hadron collider? or if i said i can fly, would you have to beilieve me until you proved i can't fly? (which you can't, btw)
@MrCardShark101 aethiests could be viewed as inherintly evil, if-and it's not to far of a stretch- we looked at it and said by not believing, you do not follow the bible, so you sin, and do not repent(for you have no reason to) so you are an unrepenting sinner, and if you are public with your opinion, then thats heracy, which could be seen as evil.
good and evil are perspectives. i suspect you know that, but try to REMEMBER THIS IN THE FUTURE. ty
@MrCardShark101 , you retarded shithead, im going to live my life to last bit of it, but at death you will see the truth with your own retarded eyes.
so simple computer can't be created with a designer but whole with infinite complexity universe can come to exist without a designer , this is even not logical to argue with
@0000000NoName0000000 He can believe what he wants to believe, it's his own opinion. I personally don't think there is any point arguing about it as we will all find out what happens when we die anyway. I don't understand what your reason is to call 'MrCardShark101' a retarded shithead, maybe he is just a little rude for calling somebody a twat, but I think it's best if we stop forcing our beliefs on other people and let them live how they like.
Thanks to the speed of the internet to and the search for the truth that you cannot pull the wool on any bodies head in this day and age, every thing is open for a debate people question their doctor their politician etc , so why do we have to believe Richard Dawkins as absolute truth , check these links then question your self what you believe youtube.com/watch?v=0hQFO6ugWxU . youtube.com/watch?v=HlCp-OH72B4&feature=related .youtube.com/watch?v=cCTuiugo7mU
My wish is for Derren to have a reading with Lisa Williams so she can wipe that smug smile off his face. He always choses the fraud psychics to experiment with. I have never ever seen him speak to a 'real' psychic. Has anyway else noticed that??
Two great. smart and intelligent English gentlemen ... Pleasure to watch these guys converse and discuss.
Gazjohnful 1 week ago
Hilarius, lying with eyes open so funny.
simplerachel11 1 week ago
'you can fork off... oh maybe I shouldn't really say that'
nipperlings 1 week ago
Something really strange happens at 9:28. They both say "but" or something, and the video sounds like it's freezing, and the world just exploded.
Ilikeroots 2 weeks ago
Great interview, but someone needs to shoot the cameraman.
theresbeenamixup 2 weeks ago
@theresbeenamixup very good observation, this is deliberately designed to make darren uncomfortable and it works really well, he tries to hypnotise drawkins but he doesnt do it very well, you see not everybody is hypnotizable unless they are out of their comfort zone. also listen to this without looking at the images and you will notice that dawkins is trying to dehypnotise darren who is actually hypnotising himself!!
eternal000sunshine 1 week ago
a way to avoid the problem of simply inventing names and waiting until someone in the audience recognizes it, is if the psychic chooses a person beforehand and then says the name. If that is the case and if someone has seen that happen, the evidence is much more convincing.
setnoset 2 weeks ago
Just bought the book that Derren Brown has made, It's fantastic, or atleast he is maiking me think so.
TarkanIV 2 weeks ago
Richard Dawkins is a bit negative
bigu236 2 weeks ago
I used to be a psychic but then I took an arrow to the knee.
frankieboyleinnit 2 weeks ago 3
@frankieboyleinnit
I hate you.
mrwho995 2 weeks ago
@frankieboyleinnit If you were psychic you should have seen it coming.
195ashes 1 week ago
@195ashes - i was a bit of a shit psychic.
frankieboyleinnit 3 days ago
I like Darren Brown, he's used his talents for entertainment and this type of thing he could keep to himself. In the know, kind of thing, but he's explaining, exposing it. There doesn't seem a malisciousness about him.
Hellsconsort 2 weeks ago
@Hellsconsort I always think that, a quality which is not shared by the religous and charlatans.
abisivepoo 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
cant belive how happy I am that I found out Derren Brown is an Atheist
StarMangledAstronaut 3 weeks ago
cant belive how happy I am that I found out Derren Brown is an Atheist
StarMangledAstronaut 3 weeks ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
These poor people are so deceived. They have lost faith in truth and became an easy prey for the spirits of evil to guide them in a descend into darkness. You can almost see the claws of daemons all around them. May god have mercy with their souls for the pits of hell is the fate they can expect. But it is never too late to repent. The way to the light is still open if you chose to open your heart & mind, pray to the lord, atone for your sins then you can hope for forgiveness
lk3hjduio 3 weeks ago
@lk3hjduio cool story.
megatimtim 3 weeks ago
@lk3hjduio Maybe you aren't aware but many athiests are former christians who lived with faith but came to see the conflicts between their beliefs and testable reality. Speaking from experience, prayer does nothing.
gromby 3 weeks ago
@lk3hjduio Another brainwashed fool I see. This type of thinking is the downfall of the human race.
KrimzonGamingUK 2 weeks ago
6.08 god why am i here..
mancsakacarl 3 weeks ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
2 gay devils together
mancsakacarl 3 weeks ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
4:06 You can fok off one way or the other. I love how Fork can sound like Fuck in a British accent.
ilovelani69 3 weeks ago
...
jinkydondon 3 weeks ago
I went to a 'Psychic' with an ex gf of mine that believed this bollocks and he started going on about a dead grandfather who died quite a while ago, I put my hand up and said yeah, mine died 12 years ago, they psychic said oh he's here with us now, he loved you very much and cared about you immensely. I said really? because he physically and sexually abused me for years. The guys face was a fucking picture! I said you didn't pick up on that did you!? and left the room 'Crying'.
rybekdesign 3 weeks ago 66
@rybekdesign LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL now that's trolling. I tip my hat to you.
linkuei83 3 weeks ago
@rybekdesign Hats off to you mate!
alexxxnewzealand 1 day ago
OMG he knows me so well!!!!!
MrDanielt96 3 weeks ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
Ohhhh yeah i've been waiting for this
sabellegrace 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
JESUS CHRIST, HIS CATHOLIC-UNIVERSAL-APOSTOLIC CHURCH, SACRAMENTS, THE BIBLE, MIRACLES, HEALINGS, ST. MARY APPARITIONS, MESSAGES FROM HEAVEN, SIGNS IN 2011 ARE NOT A MYTHOLOGY BUT THE REALITY !!!
GET READY FOR THE GREAT WARNING NOW!!!
thewarningsecondcoming . com
JezusSlave 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Okay! I have the ULTIMATE challenge for the atheist, GIVE me an answer that EXPLAINS this and you just might convert many to atheism!
Challenge....Google "Esref Armagan!"
He's a BLIND FROM BIRTH man, yet he can paint LANDSCAPES which he has NEVER SEEN....EVER!
Tell me sir and WIN this CHALLENGE...how can he know what landscapes or ANYTHING ELSE LOOKS LIKE if he was born blind?
My answer, which is CORRECT is...God tells him what to draw and guides his hand! Got a BETTER answer?
prophetbyronmotley 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
But when triple pay "was not quite what we asked for" hunting remained as strong as ever providing each player/team writes down their guesses before revealing their answers in the light of a particular set of human arrangements.
aldehydeform 1 month ago
Comment removed
newfrontier99 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Two wills that exist in the universe...
The will of God = Order - Gods wills that you do not impose your will upon others
Reason and logic begets order.
TonyLee1000 1 month ago
@TonyLee1000 It is impossible to live without imposing your will upon others. I live, I must make decisions and act, those decisions are necessarily according with my own understanding or will, and my actions will therefore affect others. There is no way around it. Even if one imagines themself to do the will of god, they are still behaving according to their own thoughts which have been affected by a belief system.
gromby 3 weeks ago
@gromby
No it`s not, it`s called cooperation.
TonyLee1000 3 weeks ago
@TonyLee1000 Humans do not agree on many things. Hence, the cause for you to have posted in the first place.
gromby 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
TonyLee1000 3 weeks ago
The will of the ungodly, the repugnant, the filthy, the unclean = Chaos - opposition to the will of GOD (denial)
The cause of randomness and chance begets chaos.
This is the only cause of WAR and CONFLICT... The result of opposing forces... A battle of wills, that GOD WILL WIN...
I DO NOT BELIEVE IN GOD, BELIEF AND DISBELIEF ARE STILL IGNORANCE!
Because in ME there is absolutely no doubt, not one little bit, not even a speck, spotless, clean! I AM THE ONE WHO CAST THE FIRST STONE.
TonyLee1000 1 month ago
I feel, therefore IAM.
TonyLee1000 1 month ago
Lets just clear up the argument for nothing.
Nothing - no thing
Thing - thing
Nothing only exist in relation to something that once was. I.E. I had ten pounds but spent it, now I have nothing left. Emphasis on the word "LEFT", nothing, not a bean.
TonyLee1000 1 month ago 14
@TonyLee1000 lol Nothing is a concept, it hasn't been proved to exist just yet, so what you've said is therefore a theory without evidence.
JayDee98765 1 month ago
@TonyLee1000 That makes no sense...
SaintFookinJimmy 3 weeks ago
@TonyLee1000 guess what, if you understand quatum physics you know that you CAN get something from nothing
TheEpicPaco 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A logical argument has a beginning and an end, an argument does not arise all by itself.
TonyLee1000 1 month ago
Atheism the folly of the arrogant.
And you shall know the wicked for they will condemn themselves by there own tongue.
This is for the godly among you... Reason, logic, cause and effect.
TonyLee1000 1 month ago
@TonyLee1000
Great point, Tony.
With an emphasis on the 'First Cause', i.e. 'Creatio ex-nihilo'.
IrresponsibleAtheism 1 month ago
@TonyLee1000 "condemn themselves by there own tongue."
My tongue spells it "their".
seansalvador1 1 month ago
@TonyLee1000
Would this be godly as defined by the Roman church committee?
MrsZambezi 3 weeks ago
For something to be reasonable, it must be logical, and if something is logical, it must be reasonable. i.e. If its not logical it cannot be reasonable.
Randomness implies that an event has taken place without a cause... This is clearly illogical.
Chance also implies that an event has occurred without cause... This to is the folly of an idiot.
As you can see, logic cannot be separated from reason.
TonyLee1000 1 month ago
@TonyLee1000 "Randomness implies that an event has taken place without a cause... This is clearly illogical."
If you knew anything at all about logic then you would see that this is a non sequitur and a bare assertion, a logical fallacy.
It is also absolutely demonstrably false. For instance, virtual particles (*random* vacuum fluctuations) are random. I could list about a million things that are random by the definition of the word.
seansalvador1 1 month ago
oh my, look who we have here. Derren looks as if he is performing an act of mentalism and richard looks agitated and confused.
SOA4ever 1 month ago
And it is completely illogical to argue about something you don't believe exits... Arrogance? Only an arrogant moron would argue about something that doesn't exist.
TonyLee1000 1 month ago
@TonyLee1000 Okay, let's never argue about characters in a film, or anything fictional, ever.
MyMoustacheAndTopHat 1 month ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
This has been flagged as spam show
@TonyLee1000 "And it is completely illogical to argue about something you don't believe exits... Arrogance?"
Of course it isn't. Explain this nonsense. If someone told me not to go to the shops because dragons will burn me i would argue that my child needs food and there are no dragons.
It is the one claiming that dragons exist in Sainsbury's who is a moron.
seansalvador1 1 month ago
There are no such things as randomness or chance both concept are akin to believing in fairies. Do people really believe that an event can take place without a cause? This is totally illogical, madness.
TonyLee1000 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TonyLee1000 "There are no such things as randomness or chance both concept are akin to believing in fairies"
Define randomness please, because you are talking nonsense.
According to several standard interpretations of quantum mechanics, microscopic phenomena are objectively random.
In mathematics, if the number line is infinite (it is) then randomness DOES exist.
seansalvador1 1 month ago
Derren Brown has got to be congratulated in tolerating a fruitcake like Dawkins. I suppose it pays well, so I'll humor the old git. Evolutionary theory which Dawkins sees as a holy bible is absolute bullshit. When will science have the courage to put this flawed unscientific theory to the dustbin?
TheLogic1010 1 month ago
@TheLogic1010 Are you being sarcastic or just stupid? I can't tell.
TheRealJoni 1 month ago
@TheRealJoni
thelogic is a sockpuppet thats on amission to smear Dawkins
sonykroket 1 month ago
@TheLogic1010 Evolution the process of natural selection driven by predator-prey interactions, environmental conditions, intra and inter specific competition and the sharing of common ancestors. Gradual adaption over thousands of years.
Or Adam & Eve, I mean diddnt eve come from adams rib, then they spoke to a talking snake and ate an apple.
Wont be put in the dustbin because there is over whelming evidence to support evolution something you cant say for religion and the bible is not evidence
jothman 1 month ago
@jothman I don't do belief driven religion mate. Try another angle!
TheLogic1010 1 month ago
This is how dumb religious folk are! They dont even know what an atheist is lol lol lol. Part the seas, talk to a snake or burning bush, feed 5000 ppl with a few loafs of bread..... And what does god do today! As Gervais says giving babies aids in Africa! well done god nice one!
jothman 1 month ago
@jothman
so by that logic i can say everyone who believes in science is stupid and point at people who thought that the testis purpose was a weight used to tension the male voice or other stupid scientific theories....or i could laugh at you for thinking the world is flat or that you matter didst exist before your birth and will not exist after your body has decayed... all wrong and all once strongly held BELIEFS within the scientific community
its easy to point out that bad theories
topbluffa1 1 month ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
thumbs up if you think Derren already had the sitters grand fathers name! :))
MiFTiL8 1 month ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
@JoyStainProductions
'You're all a bunch of egotistical cunts shoving your individual view of the universe down the throats of others'
But then you go on to say how humans are shit, etc. Which is shoving your own individual view of the Universe down our throats since human intelligence and knowledge is a major aspect when we think of the Universe, nice one mr Hypocrite. Please leave this discussion to the intellectuals.
MrCardShark101 1 month ago
@MrCardShark101 I think a healthier view would be to see humans as sacred, because, for whatever reason, were the eyes and ears of the cosmos. We and the world around us is real, so its better to try to improve yourself and your surroundings than to just condemn it as a passive, angry observer. For that reason alone, this is sacred. This isn't just some movie; Its real life. To take such an opportunity for granted and with such contempt is just sad.
JNathanK2011 1 month ago
@JNathanK2011
I fully agree with you and sadly taking this life for granted is a common theme amongst the religious. Some of them tend to see it as the 'test' to see if you are worthy to get into whatever paradise you feel is beyond death. It is up to them how they live their lives but I am going to live mine with the mentality that this is the only time of existence. *As a side note, look up "I think therefore I am" concerning your 'real' assumption, it's an interesting thought.
MrCardShark101 1 month ago
@MrCardShark101 I think its a test, but the test is whether the dialectic can evolve any further through human beings or not. As for hell, if it were real, a lot of religious people would probably go to it, because such an after-realm would exist through the duality of fear and love. ...and a lot of them thrive on fear.
JNathanK2011 1 month ago
Shocker, nobody knows the meaning of life and how we got here. So why not just shut the fuck up and live life until anything is proven because until then, you're all a bunch of egotistical cunts shoving your individual view of the universe down the throats of others, whether it be Scientific, Religious or a mix of both.
Humans are shit and we know fuck all in terms of what is out there, the intelligence we claim and the knowledge we think we have is actually tiny in the grand scale of things.
JoyStainProductions 1 month ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
@postmasterw00t
Personal testimony cannot be accepted as definitive evidence purely on the minor fact that people have an innate ability to deceive. Your parents told you about
Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy, both of which you would have regarded as true. This is a classic example of the influence authority figures have and their ability to utilise this when lying.
MrCardShark101 1 month ago
@MrCardShark101
Evolution's Euphemisms
watch?v=sOxNVg85OLA
Xibons 1 month ago
@Kartikeya1996
Actually the argument from authority is a very weak one, if one very important person says something and another says something that conflicts with the original statement then who is correct? They are both authority figures yet one of them must be wrong, hence you cannot trust an argument purely because it comes from an authority figure.
MrCardShark101 1 month ago
the teachers often believe it themselves.
i took a Tarot reading course a little while back and with out fail everyone in the room, the instructor included believed in magic and other such and even though when the techniques are being explained it becomes to abundantly clear that its fake people will simply seem to not notice and rather hold their believe in it as stronger.
ourorboros2 1 month ago
Comment removed
kartikeya1966 1 month ago
Comment removed
kartikeya1966 1 month ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
Comment removed
kartikeya1966 1 month ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
Comment removed
kartikeya1966 1 month ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
@SinnersBurnInHell
Wrong, you said "you can find evidence for God", which you can't. Granted the quotation from the Bible is valid but in a real-life example I don't think you would actually turn to God simply from experiencing the world around you. There is the 'Paley's watch' argument but personally I find this weak. What about someone who is mentally handicapped and cannot conceive the idea of religion (nor much else for that matter) would your God condemn that person for being an atheist?
MrCardShark101 1 month ago
@MrCardShark101 Evidence can be a personal account from an NDE, personal testimony is still evidence, just saying
postmasterw00t 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You can find evidence for God by reading Romans 1. "For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:" - Romans 1:20
SinnersBurnInHell 1 month ago
That is indeed correct, therefore I shall retract my last statement and say that my flaw could be my memory that failed me in my time of need.
LeroySh 1 month ago
@LeroySh I conquer. :D
Anyway, back to religion; if you were raised by athiests and never came into contact with a religious person nor did you ever learn about religion, could a so-called 'God' condemn you for being an athiest?
MrCardShark101 1 month ago
So sorry that my literary skills could not match up to that of MrCardShark101, please excuse my ignorance, see it as a flaw in my genetic design for holding of knowledge and/or memory.
LeroySh 1 month ago
@LeroySh
Surely knowledge is memory for you cannot know something that you do not remember, is this correct?
MrCardShark101 1 month ago
@LeroySh
Well it is most satisfying that my vocabulary has come to a reasonable fruition, such that others can appreciate it. Unfortunately this will sound somewhat pedantic but I noticed you missed out a full stop at the end of your comment, please refrain from this obscene mistake in future.
MrCardShark101 1 month ago
Glad to be of service, just wanted to point out the intellectual brilliance of that most enlightening comment, don't thank me, thank you MrCardShark101
LeroySh 1 month ago
'I am m' there is definitely a philosophy somewhere in that.
What I meant to say was:
...I am more than happy to challenge my views and plead you to have a respectable discussion. P.S. Thank you 'LeroySh' for that enlightening comment.
MrCardShark101 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ Virtually every religious person here.
I have provoked a response in you, used profanity to hurt you, enforced my views and insulted yours. I have shown you what we atheists are consistently experiencing from religious followers and now you are aware that it does not help anyone progress (quite apt, seeing how religion has a track record of hindering progression. Sorry, couldn't resist). Telling us we will burn in Hell doesn't really give the impression of a loving God, just a thought. I am m
MrCardShark101 1 month ago
@ Virtually every religious person here.
I have provoked a response in you, used profanity to hurt you, enforced my views and insulted yours. I have shown you what we atheists are consistently experiencing from religious followers and now you are aware that it does not help anyone progress (quite apt, seeing how religion has a track record of hindering progression. Sorry, couldn't resist). Telling us we will burn in Hell doesn't really give the impression of a loving God, just a thought. I am m
MrCardShark101 1 month ago
the last line is the best
damian13531 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Doubtlessly, there are the charlatans who profess an ability to 'tune in'. What I personally cannot deny despite the mud that dirties this subject is my own experience that has beaten probability numerous times. Specifically, dreams that outline next-day events exactly. Considering the number of variables in even the briefest of moments, to dream a minute long sequence that unfolds the next day is improbable beyond reason given the principles of chaos. There IS something more that we don't know
alwayslistening4444 1 month ago
Comment removed
alwayslistening4444 1 month ago
Comment removed
alwayslistening4444 1 month ago
two of my favorite people
superkevy11 1 month ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins 21
@superkevy11
Irreducible Complexity - Why It's Real
watch?v=S4tpYozY2CM
Xibons 1 month ago
@superkevy11 Y U NO HAS TOP COMMENT?!
yokcos 1 month ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
@superkevy11 yeah...they both make money fooling people
pogromcAbsurdow 4 weeks ago
Thank you MrCardShark101 for using 'thus' in your answer, you just do not see that literary splendour nowadays
LeroySh 2 months ago 4
@mikeymoughtin
The idea of 'good' is relative, thus you cannot call another person 'good' or 'evil' in accordance to your own morals but rather observe if they themselves act in what is considered 'good' in their own form of morality. Hence you cannot say "He is inherently evil" but rather "By my standards, he is evil" but unfortunately nobody gives a flying fuck about your standards.
Mistakes: aethiests, inherintly, bible (capital B, you should know this) and heracy. Read a fucking dictionary.
MrCardShark101 2 months ago 2
why don't they sit down if they're going to talk for so long? it must be rather tiring.
davidsixworks 2 months ago
Fork Off
bluenotejazz 2 months ago 17
@bluenotejazz lol i was just about to post fork off too haha that was funny...he tried to take it back by sayin i don't think i'm allowed to sat that
youngsplash85 1 month ago
@bluenotejazz No! go fork yourself!
cottonswoods 1 month ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
May I put something stright?
Atheists are not evil. They are people who look at the world and see that it is unlikely that there is a god, this is acheived by carefull observation of what is. As opposed to being told repeatedly that something is true, as is the case with most religeons. We are also curious, VERY curious.
We are intreugued by things of interest. Derren Brown is interesting, and Dawkins is curous.
You can see where i'm going.
IonizedApple 2 months ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
@IonizedApple please, please do not attempt to group together people into such a large heading like "aethiest" and saying all are curious. im aethist, sort of agnostic, in the sense that i am certain that the major western religions are wrong, but just becasue their "higher power" is illogical, does not mean one could'nt exist, though i doubt one does. anyways, to my point, i know a lot of aethists that see religion as another authority to rebel against no extra curiosity, just rebelion.
mikeymoughtin 2 months ago
@mikeymoughtin Okay, perhaps I was generalizing a little. Please note that my comment was mainly in response to TheLogic1010 1 and probobly should have put it is as a response.
My own atheism is drawn from scientific evidence as well as my curiosity, not the need to rebel against an unjust authority. That was what brought me to derren brown in the first place. Anyways, as a scientist, it would seem likely that dawkins is of my type.
sorry for the misunderstanting.
IonizedApple 2 months ago
Glitch in the matrix at 9:32
marleycarroll 2 months ago
both of these men are fascinating in every video I've seen them in!
catoes 2 months ago
Why does Dawkins waste his time talking to conjurers instead of doing some real science? Oh he can't do real science must be the answer. Derren Brown, how does one do cold reading down a telephone line? Dawkins accepts the theory of evolution is a falsehood, so spends time away from this fantasy. Good one Dawkins, you don't have to face your critics. Dickie is a bit of a fruitcake, but I suppose a harmless one.
TheLogic1010 2 months ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
@TheLogic1010
Troll?
sonykroket 2 months ago
@sonykroket You're really added to the debate?
TheLogic1010 2 months ago
@TheLogic1010
You really dont know grammar and spelling?
sonykroket 2 months ago
@sonykroket I know about the r mistake, the grammer is correct. You must be a bit of a fool yourself? Your missing a apostrophe between the n and t. You really are a joker!!
TheLogic1010 2 months ago
@TheLogic1010
So why are you an idiot and how does it feel to be one?
Is it like not knowing and just wonder why all those meanies act not nice to you?
sonykroket 2 months ago
@sonykroket Look in the mirror punk!
TheLogic1010 2 months ago
@TheLogic1010
Ohh, the wit, i stand in awe
You...you doodyhead!
sonykroket 2 months ago
@sonykroket Get a life.
TheLogic1010 1 month ago
@TheLogic1010
Stop switching accounts, sockpuppet
sonykroket 1 month ago
@sonykroket You don't believe yourself.
TheLogic1010 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dawkins is a scared little man who will weep on his deathbed.
Djinnmeister 2 months ago
Comment removed
Djinnmeister 2 months ago
I'd do him!
RoRoTheMighty 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dr Daniel Came, a Philosophy Professor from Dawkins own Oxford University and a fellow Atheist, has called Dawkins anti-intellectual and a coward for refusing to debate Dr Craig. Dr Came himself debated Dr Craig and they had a civil and reasonable debate.
Pussy Dawkins is a coward who would rather debate Ted Haggard, "Banana Man" and Retard O'Reilly than intellectuals. Pussy Dawkins is the Lady Gaga of science.
AtheismKills 2 months ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
@AtheismKills Totally agree with you. The cowards who have flagged your comment as spam kill free speech.
TheLogic1010 1 month ago
Comment removed
TBlenx1995 2 months ago
everyone become agnostic and stop bitching we will all find out one by one in the end
silkysketcha 2 months ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Dawkins is a weak God-hating sycophant who wont debate serious academics for fear he will be made a fool in front of his pathetic followers. Hes a coward much like his ilk.
Seigu007 2 months ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
Great interview, but use of single camera is annoying because he constantly switches back and forth and it makes me dizzy.
OrmerodJ 2 months ago
dawkins is annoying
oscie1 2 months ago
derren brown is so fake ... fake ass motherfucker
meeefe 2 months ago
@meeefe hes just intelligent unlike yourself ...
Fidgetxxnator 2 months ago 7
@Fidgetxxnator hes been proven by the police in america to fake his stunts not saying his not clever
you are obviously the one thats a fucking idiot,
meeefe 2 months ago
@meeefe oh i know everything he does is a trick and thats why its so great he doesnt say he doesnt fake it hes intelligent id the way he does..
Fidgetxxnator 2 months ago
@meeefe he is fake as he explains here u moron, he doesnt claims to be psychic he just uses psychological manipulation unlike other that does the same thing but claim to be psychic and have supernatural power for their financial gains.
2527bangna 2 months ago
@2527bangna ok i didnt watch it calm down lol
meeefe 2 months ago
I don't really see the charm of Richard Dawkins... I've never heard him say anything new or refreshing in any video I ever saw.
Don't get me wrong, I agree with him, but I see him more as a journalist than an intellectual, and with that quite a biased journalist as well. It's all very narrow and his questions are very much steering rather than exploring.
Ptrrrrrrrr 2 months ago
@Ptrrrrrrrr
Most popular people on the planet are just ordinary people, extra ordinary patience and curiosity.
mildpace 2 months ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
Derren Brown is gay, Dawkins got him to spurt this evil bullshit to further his own satanic dogma!
Falsel1ght 2 months ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
@Falsel1ght
your hilarious!
babscabs1987 2 months ago
@Falsel1ght Your an idiot.
mmorrison69 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mmorrison69 Actually Sir I believe it is you who is the idiot, or is your sarcasm detector having a day off ?
Falsel1ght 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"God" haters are a ridiculous set. Certain people will seek out thought-structures which allow them to hate, to persecute others, physically, emotionally, etc. Human institutions change; human psychology doesn't change. There is an upsetting (and a subtle) symbolic link between the old Spanish inquisitor and a modern day atheist on the offensive.
Good people don't hurt others, whether or not they believe in "God."
Ariel62073 2 months ago
People like Dawkins devote their time to non scientific work to avoid talking about his own work, evolution theory? Because it's a fake science bordering on a belief system. Time Dawkins faced the truth, he's been living a fantasy all his life and the reality must really hurt him!
TheLogic1010 2 months ago
@TheLogic1010 no-one can say what the 'truth' or 'reality' is. You can look for it, and find evidence to support your theory but that is it. Also, people that are heavily involved in science actually begin to see it as a belief system/religion, because it shares many factors with religion as we are familliar with.
SweetMintPie555 2 months ago
Comment removed
BrandonStover 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheLogic1010 "People like Dawkins devote their time to non scientific work to avoid talking about his own work, evolution theory? Because it's a fake science bordering on a belief system. Time Dawkins faced the truth, he's been living a fantasy all his life and the reality must really hurt him!"
- what a pile of ignorant vomit.
nordhorny 2 months ago
@TheLogic1010 go have a conversation with a talking snake then get back to me you nut bar!
jothman 1 month ago
@jothman Another fruitcake like Dawkins, love it!
TheLogic1010 1 month ago
Dawkins is a bad spokesperson for Atheism. Don't judge him and believe all Atheists are the same. The majority are peaceful (more so than Christians)
sparkymmilarky 2 months ago
@sparkymmilarky are you an athiest yourself
TheRandomstuff12345 2 months ago
@sparkymmilarky Dawkins has done more harm to atheism and science than anyone. The man is a fruitcake and a lost deluded madman.
TheLogic1010 1 month ago
@BelieveandtrustJesus
It's not that athiests are inherently evil, or even hate religion, athiests simply do not believe that a supernatural Being(s) created the Universe. So please do everyone a massive favour and stop preaching to us all. Perhaps if you had a particularly influential preacher some athiests may be fooled into a religious belief. But trust me, having you as a representative of religion is really not doing your lot any good, mostly because you're a bit of a twat.
MrCardShark101 2 months ago 57
@MrCardShark101 Problem with Atheism is that they claim to not believe that "Supernatural Being(s) created the Universe" because there are no facts to prove this. But, on the other hand is there proof that Supernatural Being(s) didn't create the universe either. Never mind the fact that humans have no proof of them even existing! Agnosticism simply states that we don't have proof to back any belief up, in turn stating that we can't know how the universe was created.
TL;DR Your logic is flawed
killerdirector 2 months ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
@killerdirector "Agnosticism simply states that we don't have proof to back any belief up"
utter nonsense.
agnosticism means, literally, etymologically, the belief that the acquisition of absolute certainty isnt possible.
most atheists and agnostic and most agnostics are atheists.
volound 2 months ago
@volound you get it. no one in these comments gets it, but you do. ty
mikeymoughtin 2 months ago
@killerdirector ......we (aethist) are not the ones trying to prove anything......so, we don't need proof. proof is only neccisary when trying to prove something, not in the claiming their lack of proof is wrong. like, if einstien said "light is as fast as it gets." and provided no evidence, would people then have to believe him until eventually we made a hadron collider? or if i said i can fly, would you have to beilieve me until you proved i can't fly? (which you can't, btw)
mikeymoughtin 2 months ago
@MrCardShark101 aethiests could be viewed as inherintly evil, if-and it's not to far of a stretch- we looked at it and said by not believing, you do not follow the bible, so you sin, and do not repent(for you have no reason to) so you are an unrepenting sinner, and if you are public with your opinion, then thats heracy, which could be seen as evil.
good and evil are perspectives. i suspect you know that, but try to REMEMBER THIS IN THE FUTURE. ty
mikeymoughtin 2 months ago
@MrCardShark101 what does athiests and evil have to do with derren browns interview
chriswilliamstool 2 months ago
@MrCardShark101 , you retarded shithead, im going to live my life to last bit of it, but at death you will see the truth with your own retarded eyes.
so simple computer can't be created with a designer but whole with infinite complexity universe can come to exist without a designer , this is even not logical to argue with
0000000NoName0000000 1 month ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
@0000000NoName0000000 He can believe what he wants to believe, it's his own opinion. I personally don't think there is any point arguing about it as we will all find out what happens when we die anyway. I don't understand what your reason is to call 'MrCardShark101' a retarded shithead, maybe he is just a little rude for calling somebody a twat, but I think it's best if we stop forcing our beliefs on other people and let them live how they like.
djunior874 1 month ago
@djunior874 i forced no body , and that guy he started talking in shitty way,
and yes we all will find out what is after death, death is absolute fact
0000000NoName0000000 1 month ago
@MrCardShark101 lol - says the even bigger twat
sonydigital1 1 month ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
Holy shit, the intellect in this video is blowing my mind!!!!!
TraceurMeeka 2 months ago
NICK CLEGGCK CLEGG 1:1 MARTIN TRUFFLES MI5
whotaughtyou 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thanks to the speed of the internet to and the search for the truth that you cannot pull the wool on any bodies head in this day and age, every thing is open for a debate people question their doctor their politician etc , so why do we have to believe Richard Dawkins as absolute truth , check these links then question your self what you believe youtube.com/watch?v=0hQFO6ugWxU . youtube.com/watch?v=HlCp-OH72B4&feature=related .youtube.com/watch?v=cCTuiugo7mU
simonmathew615 3 months ago
He's asked Psychic Sally to do a test to see if she's a 'real psychic' ... and she denied. Of course.
musicMONKEY07 3 months ago 35
This has been flagged as spam show
Richard Dawkins is a Conciously Unshakeable Nihilistic Thinker: C.U.N.T.
JEKAZOL 3 months ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
This has been flagged as spam show
My wish is for Derren to have a reading with Lisa Williams so she can wipe that smug smile off his face. He always choses the fraud psychics to experiment with. I have never ever seen him speak to a 'real' psychic. Has anyway else noticed that??
Sherry78 3 months ago in playlist Derren Brown Interview - Richard Dawkins
the interviewer looks a bit like pat condell
Adsem 3 months ago
@Adsem Pat Condell wishes he was Richard Dawkins
LORDUnLuCkY13 3 months ago
@Adsem