Does the photo not get its date from the camera time stamp and if the time stamp is wrong ie people might not set it right,month instead of day that would go onto the photo,also how did you get the original photo to read the time stamp of it,is it transmitted with an e mail of the photo?
The truth will come soon. Personally I believe the Mcannes know a lot more than they're letting off, but whatever the case, you'd have to be a pretty terrible parent to leave your toddler alone in unattended for so long. Neglect, or a desperate cover up
I agree about the diffrent photos, because first time I brought her photos to school. my friend all thought that they are not the same person.. but i told her, its just a girl, not girls.. but they didnt believe it...
On 2 April 2008 Madeleine became a Ward of this Court, and since that date has remained a Ward.
At all times jurisdiction was assumed by the Court because, there being no evidence to the contrary, it is presumed Madeleine is alive.
McCanns intended to apply to make Madeleine a Ward of Court I suspected that what was behind it was trying to protect the McCanns copyright to profit from the sale of Madeleine wristbands etc. In any event, I wondered how a dead child could be made a Ward of Court.
father moved the body + later mother called the police.
BLOOD + DNA evidence in car + flat + teddy.
NO sign of any forced entry. other kids undisturbed.
'Abducter' left 0 dna / marks / scratches on door , the world's most amazing abducter decides to take the child when there are people dining + drinking < 100m away.
@buganna1 Don't forget with the frequency of visits to the apartment by Gerry & co that alone would put off a would-be abductor. I agree 100% with your thesis.
indeed! they fucked up by leaving the kids alone..knew they would be villified,prosecuted,even jailed...so they had to create a smoke sceen...self preservation kicked in...the truth will out!
there IS plenty of EVIDENCE to support the fact that the child did die in the apartment, and that NO intruder ever came in, and that the father moved / hid the childs body the same evening.
NO forced entry to door or window
Sniffer dogs detected blood in car / apartment
DNA found from blood in cupboard and rear of sofa and hire car boot + teddy
Contradicting statments, and taking the 200% longer way around to check girls ?
This is... I dont know what to say because OF COURSE the picture was modified, they should have cut it or made a zoom of it to see better the little girl on it.... you guys always trying to find things that do not exist.
im not being funny, because im still of the opinion that the parents are dicks, but how did u get this info off an xp computer? it seems pretty suspicious in itself
ALL the Fucking Schizzo Stockhoilm Syndrome Nazi Catholic's are in on this fucking scam, even making profit for their Murder of children produced via artificial fertilisation of a specific embryo called MAD, even Morat and Jerry's borther John's got one of them, like thousand's of other Freemasons have one in their family which they use for swapping their crime's with in the Public Record's after they've murdered them for their Innocent Pure Live's, fact!
NH$ = $ = Sacrifice of the 33rd Degree Spinal Bone = Praia De Luz; is that a good enough translation for a Freemasons rendition of a Spanish Blackmoore's Murder of an artificially fertilised embryo of hundred's of the same kid created for a Scapegoat for the RC Church, Infidelic Imbasillio!
minilise, I thought the same, that unless you have the original file then analysis is bunk. But I have my own photographs stored on picture hosting sites, so I downloaded one and had a look at the exif metadata (with acdsee), and there is the date and time the file was edited (when I made the file smaller for web storage) but also the date and time of the original. 2 possibilities; one can edit the metadata, also maybe the camera wasn't set to the right date to begin with.
Who is too say they didn't leave Madeline unattended and had planned the trip and have her taken away from the family? It is heavily believed that Maddie was sedated.. So I think they know exactly what's going on
its not very likely someone would randomely steal a child from a wealthy family in a highly populated area! why? no ransom was called, no traces, if someone wants to steal a child wothout anyone knowing they could go sonewhere in the middle of nowhere! both parents are doctors they suscribe sediteves to people all the time an overdose of sleeping sediteves mabey killed her, accedentally, both parents would be imprisoned, loose custody of both children and loose aboility to practice.. cover it up
@uredead Well said. This will happen one day and justice will be done. They have been very lucky and enjoyed the protection of the evil media in the UK all along.
You cannot scan a photo. The photo has to be on the camera or downloaded into your computer from your camera. Then you put it into EXIFTOOL (that is the name of the software). You drag the photo and drop it into exiftool and imediatley that shows you all the data from "brhind the photo" sort to speak. Do you understand now?
I tried the EXIFTOOL, it only showed when it was last modified, not when the original pic was taken. And im sure that they need the original picture to check, and I guess no one axcept the parents have that photo? The one used in this video must have been a photo copied from their website? Im sure its not the original photo? I tried copy the picture and checked it in EXIFTOOL, it did not show the original date, but showed last modified 15.05.2009...
If the photo was never modified, it shows the date you took the picture. Obviously if you modifie it, it show the last date you have altered the picture! That's how we knew the ORIGINAL DATE, beacose it showed it, not when it was last modified. Look under ORIGINAL DATE, not last modified. Anyway, 2 photo experts did that, so I think that they know their job better than us, don't you?
Ummm, maybe i'm going a little over board, but the pic you've got for avatar looks just like the lady seen walking with the lil girl that looks like maddie. Is that your pic, or just one you uploaded?
can you please tell me what this "special software" is called that lets you know the exact date of when a picture was taken. as the last time i checked no such software existed. I think the makers of this documentary are fantasists plain and simple.
The name of this softaware is given in the first little clip posted here and you find it on the internet, but you can only do that with digital photos only.
if they know where she is then why not take her bacc to her family andd friends
instead of telling us on here....
how can that pictuer be taken 2 days after maddie went missing un less the man oh women that got her tuck it with they camer oh phone but they wouldnt put it on show oh for public to see because they would get cote....
The point is that the documentary "The Photos Game Diary", that took Europe by storm, shows EXACTLY where this little girl is, and who's behind her dissapearnce!
If whoever made this video knows 'exactly where this little girl is' why don't they just come out and say so publicly - not on Youtube - and save everyone a lot of heartache looking for her?
Comment removed
Rock123 1 year ago
I think the parents killed her!
turdbogbuster 1 year ago 29
@turdbogbuster BUT WHYYYYYYY ?????????? :(
canceraki69 1 year ago
Does the photo not get its date from the camera time stamp and if the time stamp is wrong ie people might not set it right,month instead of day that would go onto the photo,also how did you get the original photo to read the time stamp of it,is it transmitted with an e mail of the photo?
CHANNELOMD 1 year ago 21
The truth will come soon. Personally I believe the Mcannes know a lot more than they're letting off, but whatever the case, you'd have to be a pretty terrible parent to leave your toddler alone in unattended for so long. Neglect, or a desperate cover up
ncshuriken 1 year ago 24
MystifDawn is a child molester on here to access peoples children with KaOssis.
BEWARE.
mrarches 1 year ago
I agree about the diffrent photos, because first time I brought her photos to school. my friend all thought that they are not the same person.. but i told her, its just a girl, not girls.. but they didnt believe it...
TheIreneaustin 1 year ago
Wow x
emmyemma101 1 year ago
Maybe that date is the date it was uploaded, not when it was taken
libby1510 2 years ago 48
@libby1510 it shows the date that it was taken not uploaded. That's the way it works. There is no maybe
NOTV7 1 year ago 4
all the children look different
sooouuuuper 2 years ago
sit might be modified, but the 'modification' may just be cropping for example.
deighton2002 2 years ago 16
@deighton2002 no, beacose it shows that as well. we are talking when ORIGINAL photo was taken
NOTV7 1 year ago
could it be scanned from a print?
deighton2002 1 year ago
On 2 April 2008 Madeleine became a Ward of this Court, and since that date has remained a Ward.
At all times jurisdiction was assumed by the Court because, there being no evidence to the contrary, it is presumed Madeleine is alive.
McCanns intended to apply to make Madeleine a Ward of Court I suspected that what was behind it was trying to protect the McCanns copyright to profit from the sale of Madeleine wristbands etc. In any event, I wondered how a dead child could be made a Ward of Court.
oldbag699 2 years ago
The McCann's are involved in the biggest child and drug trafficking cult for the UK gvmnt by the NHS, civil services, and police on the planet!
Brian Gerrish (Common Purpose) Child Stealing by the State
KaOssis 2 years ago
What kind of parents left 3 childs alone ??
123321assssa 2 years ago 9
child died in the apartment.
due to a fall from sofa onto hard floor.
parents found child dead.
father moved the body + later mother called the police.
BLOOD + DNA evidence in car + flat + teddy.
NO sign of any forced entry. other kids undisturbed.
'Abducter' left 0 dna / marks / scratches on door , the world's most amazing abducter decides to take the child when there are people dining + drinking < 100m away.
Parents REFUSE lie detector test.
buganna1 2 years ago 14
@buganna1 Don't forget with the frequency of visits to the apartment by Gerry & co that alone would put off a would-be abductor. I agree 100% with your thesis.
LordArsehat 2 years ago
indeed! they fucked up by leaving the kids alone..knew they would be villified,prosecuted,even jailed...so they had to create a smoke sceen...self preservation kicked in...the truth will out!
heston99 2 years ago
@buganna1 Omg!x I Never Thought Of That, I Always Believed Someone Had Took Her, Thats So Sad, But So Truee.x
xPrincessSarraahhx 2 years ago
there IS plenty of EVIDENCE to support the fact that the child did die in the apartment, and that NO intruder ever came in, and that the father moved / hid the childs body the same evening.
NO forced entry to door or window
Sniffer dogs detected blood in car / apartment
DNA found from blood in cupboard and rear of sofa and hire car boot + teddy
Contradicting statments, and taking the 200% longer way around to check girls ?
Kate washed teddy immediately ( but dog still +
buganna1 2 years ago 5
There are so many explanations for this that it would be ridiculous to go into them all.
I just think it's silly that people try to deny this whole thing.... when it's so unrealistic that it's a hoax/conspiracy.
Also, EVEN if they were guilty, at least it's raising awareness for the problem of kids getting abducted.
sum10169 2 years ago
This is... I dont know what to say because OF COURSE the picture was modified, they should have cut it or made a zoom of it to see better the little girl on it.... you guys always trying to find things that do not exist.
KarituVideos 2 years ago
Interessante - eu já tinha sugerido à PJ em 2007 que analisassem as fotos, porque já havia suspeitas nessa altura...
Muito bom voz-off também!
Justice4Madeleine 2 years ago
good information video...
AlanCutie18 2 years ago
GOOOD !
Jasmin1763 2 years ago
im not being funny, because im still of the opinion that the parents are dicks, but how did u get this info off an xp computer? it seems pretty suspicious in itself
plazabo 2 years ago 3
The mother have killing madeleine.She have killing!!!Madeleine is dead.
AnimalFriendSpain 2 years ago
ALL the Fucking Schizzo Stockhoilm Syndrome Nazi Catholic's are in on this fucking scam, even making profit for their Murder of children produced via artificial fertilisation of a specific embryo called MAD, even Morat and Jerry's borther John's got one of them, like thousand's of other Freemasons have one in their family which they use for swapping their crime's with in the Public Record's after they've murdered them for their Innocent Pure Live's, fact!
KaOssis 2 years ago 9
NH$ = $ = Sacrifice of the 33rd Degree Spinal Bone = Praia De Luz; is that a good enough translation for a Freemasons rendition of a Spanish Blackmoore's Murder of an artificially fertilised embryo of hundred's of the same kid created for a Scapegoat for the RC Church, Infidelic Imbasillio!
KaOssis 2 years ago 4
Podia falar português?
Could you speak portuguese please?
CmMmAo 2 years ago
minilise, I thought the same, that unless you have the original file then analysis is bunk. But I have my own photographs stored on picture hosting sites, so I downloaded one and had a look at the exif metadata (with acdsee), and there is the date and time the file was edited (when I made the file smaller for web storage) but also the date and time of the original. 2 possibilities; one can edit the metadata, also maybe the camera wasn't set to the right date to begin with.
brendel99 2 years ago 4
Who is too say they didn't leave Madeline unattended and had planned the trip and have her taken away from the family? It is heavily believed that Maddie was sedated.. So I think they know exactly what's going on
QPRLAD86 2 years ago 13
She is dead, it's just a question of who killed her. I suspect the parents stongly.
adamscott 2 years ago 112
its not very likely someone would randomely steal a child from a wealthy family in a highly populated area! why? no ransom was called, no traces, if someone wants to steal a child wothout anyone knowing they could go sonewhere in the middle of nowhere! both parents are doctors they suscribe sediteves to people all the time an overdose of sleeping sediteves mabey killed her, accedentally, both parents would be imprisoned, loose custody of both children and loose aboility to practice.. cover it up
uredead 2 years ago 69
@uredead Well said. This will happen one day and justice will be done. They have been very lucky and enjoyed the protection of the evil media in the UK all along.
2replybiz 1 year ago 13
me to
theblob34 2 years ago
yh i do agree she looks different in every single of her photo. werid.
Hattieriding 2 years ago 3
what is the special software
why not say the precise name
and how did u get hold of the photo, could you just scan it in?
go through the whole process because your bulshitting
freefall1992 2 years ago
You cannot scan a photo. The photo has to be on the camera or downloaded into your computer from your camera. Then you put it into EXIFTOOL (that is the name of the software). You drag the photo and drop it into exiftool and imediatley that shows you all the data from "brhind the photo" sort to speak. Do you understand now?
NOTV7 2 years ago
I tried the EXIFTOOL, it only showed when it was last modified, not when the original pic was taken. And im sure that they need the original picture to check, and I guess no one axcept the parents have that photo? The one used in this video must have been a photo copied from their website? Im sure its not the original photo? I tried copy the picture and checked it in EXIFTOOL, it did not show the original date, but showed last modified 15.05.2009...
minilise 2 years ago
If the photo was never modified, it shows the date you took the picture. Obviously if you modifie it, it show the last date you have altered the picture! That's how we knew the ORIGINAL DATE, beacose it showed it, not when it was last modified. Look under ORIGINAL DATE, not last modified. Anyway, 2 photo experts did that, so I think that they know their job better than us, don't you?
NOTV7 2 years ago
Ummm, maybe i'm going a little over board, but the pic you've got for avatar looks just like the lady seen walking with the lil girl that looks like maddie. Is that your pic, or just one you uploaded?
kittkatt032 2 years ago 3
can you please tell me what this "special software" is called that lets you know the exact date of when a picture was taken. as the last time i checked no such software existed. I think the makers of this documentary are fantasists plain and simple.
bigmac329190 2 years ago
The name of this softaware is given in the first little clip posted here and you find it on the internet, but you can only do that with digital photos only.
NOTV7 2 years ago
not really but how can that pictuer be taken 2 days after maddie went missing ?
sophielou94 2 years ago
well who toke her and where is she you know it
melosexy19 2 years ago
where can we get the "special sofware"...can u tell me.....
MeemeeMao 2 years ago
It could be that the settings (date/time) on the camera were inaccurate. My money's on that, actually.
Frizzle14 2 years ago 4
When other photos were compared, the time and date of the camera WERE accurate..............
NOTV7 2 years ago
if they know where she is then why not take her bacc to her family andd friends
instead of telling us on here....
how can that pictuer be taken 2 days after maddie went missing un less the man oh women that got her tuck it with they camer oh phone but they wouldnt put it on show oh for public to see because they would get cote....
sophielou94 2 years ago
You didn't understand at all what is all about, did you?........
NOTV7 2 years ago
It's kinda like that song by Immoral Technique - Bin Laden , except Bin Laden is about 9/11 not the Mccans.
The Mccans whacked their own daughter and our now cashing in. Look at it passed what is written in the Sun.
Grom619 2 years ago 2
but your theorie isn't posible i guess..
because .. if the kidnappers took the pictures..
how could the PARENT give the photos to the police. ?? =O
EmmaV54069 2 years ago
obviously if the parents "kidnapped" their own daughter.. duh.
holly226 2 years ago 3
wow i whatched videos about her a few minutes ago and it just comes down to all this it is so confussing
tootpoops 2 years ago
If you know 'the truth' why don't you go to the authorities with it? Youtube is not a vehicle of justice.
Yeldnih 3 years ago
if its true, why has nothing been done about it, why would her parents stage a kidnap ????
biancoooo 3 years ago
Where can i watch this documentary?
mialouise3 3 years ago
The point is that the documentary "The Photos Game Diary", that took Europe by storm, shows EXACTLY where this little girl is, and who's behind her dissapearnce!
NOTV7 3 years ago
Where is she then? And who took her? If they knew this she would be found wouldnt she!
mialouise3 3 years ago
If you know 'exactly where she is' why not let her parents know and return her to her family?
Yeldnih 3 years ago
Actualy, they were informed, but weren't interested to check it out.......why? you tell me!!!
NOTV7 3 years ago
If whoever made this video knows 'exactly where this little girl is' why don't they just come out and say so publicly - not on Youtube - and save everyone a lot of heartache looking for her?
Yeldnih 3 years ago
The Point Is A Little Girl Has Gone Missing And She Needs To Be Found !
x3
Shanicee151 3 years ago