Added: 3 years ago
From: NOTV7
Views: 74,122
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (61)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • I think the parents killed her!

  • @turdbogbuster BUT WHYYYYYYY ?????????? :(

  • Does the photo not get its date from the camera time stamp and if the time stamp is wrong ie people might not set it right,month instead of day that would go onto the photo,also how did you get the original photo to read the time stamp of it,is it transmitted with an e mail of the photo?

  • The truth will come soon. Personally I believe the Mcannes know a lot more than they're letting off, but whatever the case, you'd have to be a pretty terrible parent to leave your toddler alone in unattended for so long. Neglect, or a desperate cover up

  • MystifDawn is a child molester on here to access peoples children with KaOssis.

    BEWARE.

  • I agree about the diffrent photos, because first time I brought her photos to school. my friend all thought that they are not the same person.. but i told her, its just a girl, not girls.. but they didnt believe it...

  • Wow x

  • Maybe that date is the date it was uploaded, not when it was taken

  • @libby1510 it shows the date that it was taken not uploaded. That's the way it works. There is no maybe

  • all the children look different

  • sit might be modified, but the 'modification' may just be cropping for example.

  • @deighton2002 no, beacose it shows that as well. we are talking when ORIGINAL photo was taken

  • could it be scanned from a print?

  • On 2 April 2008 Madeleine became a Ward of this Court, and since that date has remained a Ward.

    At all times jurisdiction was assumed by the Court because, there being no evidence to the contrary, it is presumed Madeleine is alive.

    McCanns intended to apply to make Madeleine a Ward of Court I suspected that what was behind it was trying to protect the McCanns copyright to profit from the sale of Madeleine wristbands etc. In any event, I wondered how a dead child could be made a Ward of Court.

  • The McCann's are involved in the biggest child and drug trafficking cult for the UK gvmnt by the NHS, civil services, and police on the planet!

    Brian Gerrish (Common Purpose) Child Stealing by the State

  • What kind of parents left 3 childs alone ??

  • child died in the apartment.

    due to a fall from sofa onto hard floor.

    parents found child dead.

    father moved the body + later mother called the police.

    BLOOD + DNA evidence in car + flat + teddy.

    NO sign of any forced entry. other kids undisturbed.

    'Abducter' left 0 dna / marks / scratches on door , the world's most amazing abducter decides to take the child when there are people dining + drinking < 100m away.

    Parents REFUSE lie detector test.

  • @buganna1 Don't forget with the frequency of visits to the apartment by Gerry & co that alone would put off a would-be abductor. I agree 100% with your thesis.

  • indeed! they fucked up by leaving the kids alone..knew they would be villified,prosecuted,even jailed...so they had to create a smoke sceen...self preservation kicked in...the truth will out!

  • @buganna1 Omg!x I Never Thought Of That, I Always Believed Someone Had Took Her, Thats So Sad, But So Truee.x

  • there IS plenty of EVIDENCE to support the fact that the child did die in the apartment, and that NO intruder ever came in, and that the father moved / hid the childs body the same evening.

    NO forced entry to door or window

    Sniffer dogs detected blood in car / apartment

    DNA found from blood in cupboard and rear of sofa and hire car boot + teddy

    Contradicting statments, and taking the 200% longer way around to check girls ?

    Kate washed teddy immediately ( but dog still +

  • There are so many explanations for this that it would be ridiculous to go into them all.

    I just think it's silly that people try to deny this whole thing.... when it's so unrealistic that it's a hoax/conspiracy.

    Also, EVEN if they were guilty, at least it's raising awareness for the problem of kids getting abducted.

  • This is... I dont know what to say because OF COURSE the picture was modified, they should have cut it or made a zoom of it to see better the little girl on it.... you guys always trying to find things that do not exist.

  • Interessante - eu já tinha sugerido à PJ em 2007 que analisassem as fotos, porque já havia suspeitas nessa altura...

    Muito bom voz-off também!

  • good information video...

  • GOOOD !

  • im not being funny, because im still of the opinion that the parents are dicks, but how did u get this info off an xp computer? it seems pretty suspicious in itself

  • The mother have killing madeleine.She have killing!!!Madeleine  is dead.

  • ALL the Fucking Schizzo Stockhoilm Syndrome Nazi Catholic's are in on this fucking scam, even making profit for their Murder of children produced via artificial fertilisation of a specific embryo called MAD, even Morat and Jerry's borther John's got one of them, like thousand's of other Freemasons have one in their family which they use for swapping their crime's with in the Public Record's after they've murdered them for their Innocent Pure Live's, fact!

  • NH$ = $ = Sacrifice of the 33rd Degree Spinal Bone = Praia De Luz; is that a good enough translation for a Freemasons rendition of a Spanish Blackmoore's Murder of an artificially fertilised embryo of hundred's of the same kid created for a Scapegoat for the RC Church, Infidelic Imbasillio!

  • Podia falar português?

    Could you speak portuguese please?

  • minilise, I thought the same, that unless you have the original file then analysis is bunk. But I have my own photographs stored on picture hosting sites, so I downloaded one and had a look at the exif metadata (with acdsee), and there is the date and time the file was edited (when I made the file smaller for web storage) but also the date and time of the original. 2 possibilities; one can edit the metadata, also maybe the camera wasn't set to the right date to begin with.

  • Who is too say they didn't leave Madeline unattended and had planned the trip and have her taken away from the family? It is heavily believed that Maddie was sedated.. So I think they know exactly what's going on

  • She is dead, it's just a question of who killed her. I suspect the parents stongly.

  • its not very likely someone would randomely steal a child from a wealthy family in a highly populated area! why? no ransom was called, no traces, if someone wants to steal a child wothout anyone knowing they could go sonewhere in the middle of nowhere! both parents are doctors they suscribe sediteves to people all the time an overdose of sleeping sediteves mabey killed her, accedentally, both parents would be imprisoned, loose custody of both children and loose aboility to practice.. cover it up

  • @uredead Well said. This will happen one day and justice will be done. They have been very lucky and enjoyed the protection of the evil media in the UK all along.

  • me to

  • yh i do agree she looks different in every single of her photo. werid.

  • what is the special software

    why not say the precise name

    and how did u get hold of the photo, could you just scan it in?

    go through the whole process because your bulshitting

  • You cannot scan a photo. The photo has to be on the camera or downloaded into your computer from your camera. Then you put it into EXIFTOOL (that is the name of the software). You drag the photo and drop it into exiftool and imediatley that shows you all the data from "brhind the photo" sort to speak. Do you understand now?

  • I tried the EXIFTOOL, it only showed when it was last modified, not when the original pic was taken. And im sure that they need the original picture to check, and I guess no one axcept the parents have that photo? The one used in this video must have been a photo copied from their website? Im sure its not the original photo? I tried copy the picture and checked it in EXIFTOOL, it did not show the original date, but showed last modified 15.05.2009...

  • If the photo was never modified, it shows the date you took the picture. Obviously if you modifie it, it show the last date you have altered the picture! That's how we knew the ORIGINAL DATE, beacose it showed it, not when it was last modified. Look under ORIGINAL DATE, not last modified. Anyway, 2 photo experts did that, so I think that they know their job better than us, don't you?

  • Ummm, maybe i'm going a little over board, but the pic you've got for avatar looks just like the lady seen walking with the lil girl that looks like maddie. Is that your pic, or just one you uploaded?

  • can you please tell me what this "special software" is called that lets you know the exact date of when a picture was taken. as the last time i checked no such software existed. I think the makers of this documentary are fantasists plain and simple.

  • The name of this softaware is given in the first little clip posted here and you find it on the internet, but you can only do that with digital photos only.

  • not really but how can that pictuer be taken 2 days after maddie went missing ?

  • well who toke her and where is she you know it

  • where can we get the "special sofware"...can u tell me.....

  • It could be that the settings (date/time) on the camera were inaccurate. My money's on that, actually.

  • When other photos were compared, the time and date of the camera WERE accurate..............

  • if they know where she is then why not take her bacc to her family andd friends

    instead of telling us on here....

    how can that pictuer be taken 2 days after maddie went missing un less the man oh women that got her tuck it with they camer oh phone but they wouldnt put it on show oh for public to see because they would get cote....

  • You didn't understand at all what is all about, did you?........

  • It's kinda like that song by Immoral Technique - Bin Laden , except Bin Laden is about 9/11 not the Mccans.

    The Mccans whacked their own daughter and our now cashing in. Look at it passed what is written in the Sun.

  • but your theorie isn't posible i guess..

    because .. if the kidnappers took the pictures..

    how could the PARENT give the photos to the police. ?? =O

  • obviously if the parents "kidnapped" their own daughter.. duh.

  • wow i whatched videos about her a few minutes ago and it just comes down to all this it is so confussing

  • If you know 'the truth' why don't you go to the authorities with it? Youtube is not a vehicle of justice.

  • if its true, why has nothing been done about it, why would her parents stage a kidnap ????

  • Where can i watch this documentary?

  • The point is that the documentary "The Photos Game Diary", that took Europe by storm, shows EXACTLY where this little girl is, and who's behind her dissapearnce!

  • Where is she then? And who took her? If they knew this she would be found wouldnt she!

  • If you know 'exactly where she is' why not let her parents know and return her to her family?

  • Actualy, they were informed, but weren't interested to check it out.......why? you tell me!!!

  • If whoever made this video knows 'exactly where this little girl is' why don't they just come out and say so publicly - not on Youtube - and save everyone a lot of heartache looking for her?

  • The Point Is A Little Girl Has Gone Missing And She Needs To Be Found !

    x3

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more