Added: 2 years ago
From: fukka007
Views: 198,846
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (455)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What episode is this?

  • Why does professor resemble Fry when he has that hair?

  • @JokeriPokeri17 He's Fry's nephew

  • @qwertyuiop123456168 and Grandson to the x degree

  • Try saying this to a Physicist & their reaction would be something similar to saying "Pi is exactly 3."

  • @WoodymanTHEJ close enough

  • Just like to say at the time of reading, "udsuna"s top comment has 42 likes...let's hope this never changes...

  • Theres is several species of social insects including ants and termites which wage war.

  • TheTerrorUforgot buggers young boys.  FACT.

  • Magic, got it.

  • This is from the film 'Bender's Game'.

  • Humans are a virus.

  • @sritger Shut up and join ELF

  • yes that quantum physics. sad that we god so deranged. but classical common sense cause and effect physix shall yet prevail!

  • But humans are animals... so animals have had wars.. also we are not even the only species to have had wars on earth, so his argument is invalid.

  • for a second i thought it was "nature is chaos masturbating as balance"

  • @olla67676 That actually makes even MORE sense!

  • Lol, Deepak Chopra.

  • Except that if you knew anything you would know that chimpanzees do in fact have wars that can go on for decades.

  • LOL deepak chopra. what a quack

  • Animals do have war with their species. Wolves would pee in their terrictory and attack packs of other wolves who seem to be a threat. Apes would form a gang and ambush and kill enemy apes. In the animal kingdom it is more a gang war than an entire species attacking one another...hey that kinda sounds like us!

    Gang = Countries ....We never had war with another species nor did we ever teamed up all together..

  • @CptMole your thesis can be summarized more simply to just include normal gang activity too. All they do is subject to basic animal instincts.

  • @CptMole never had war with another species? "Rabit season!"

  • Humans are apes. And mammals. And animals. We have wars just like the rest of them.

  • Well, Humans do technically count as Animals.

  • Zoidberg is technically an animal and his entire species took over the earth once.

  • LOL I wish my Quantum Mechanics teacher in college taught like this.

  • i love how the two coments preceding mine are almost alike though by different people

  • Oatmeal! are you crazy?

  • Oatmeal? Are you CRAZY!

  • Shouldn't the real argument here be over what constitutes a "war"? Are ant's even capable of slaughter. as CoronaMage claimed? If so, we'd have to change how we define "slaughter" for ants.

  • Fucksake guys. Insects ARE animals... Wether you get it or not ants are insects and animals because they are invetebrates and invertebrates and animals. Seriously.

  • "Oatmeal?! ARE YOU CRAZY?!!!"

    I had to do it, old or not :3

  • Don't ants make war too? And hold captured enemy ants as slaves?

  • should be called Professor puts arrogant spawn of cable news back in its place with the rest of the wonder bread

  • But NO species exists "in harmony" or "sustainably". Everything is constantly destroying everything around it. The so-called "evolutionary arms race" has wiped out many a species well before humans were around to do it more efficiently.

    Nature's not in equilibrium. There's simply a constant struggle which usually comes out to a nearly zero sum. But equilibrium? Haha. No. Geosynchronous orbit is equilibrium. Nature is chaos masquerading as balance.

    That's what makes it beautiful.

  • @udsuna ah dumb asses aarguing on a Futurama video.

    This is why we can't have nice things!!!

  • @udsuna you should have been wiped out... off your mother's face.

  • @udsuna

    DOHOHOHO

  • @udsuna in a cosmic sort of way, yeah, beautiful.

  • @udsuna "Nature is chaos masquerading as balance." awesome line

  • @udsuna Correct, six thousand hulls!

  • @udsuna Evolutions are trained by a dynamic equilibrium between genetic accidents and needs of the species, while the geosynchronous orbit is a static equilibrium (even if an "accident" can happen and put it in dynamic equilibrium since it's not a closed universe).

  • @udsuna

    I want to make sweet, dirty love to your brain :3

  • @udsuna

    I should mention, I'm aware, as many people are, that Gould got there before you, but you put it rather beautifully ;o

  • @udsuna ......I agree.

  • @udsuna Holy crap... Did you come up with this yourself?

  • @udsuna You think you are smarter than the professor? Get out of here.

  • @udsuna

    Ponies.

  • @udsuna Ah, but there is some form of balance, otherwise chaos wouldn't be able to masquerade as anything.;

  • @boomboombeast they can happen at any time for no reason!

  • One must wonder, how do these arguments start?

  • funny thing is, by studying animals closely, and especially primate species, you do find wars between different colonies :P

  • If animals were as inteligent as humans they probably would murder, start wars and show racism just as much as humans.

  • @CyberLance26 animals are just as intelligent as humans, the fact that their intelligence is different to what we see as intelligence doesn't mean anything. To say humans are more intelligent just because of the unneeded rubbish we think is intelligence, is only showing that we have our own superiority complex over animals, similar to the bible's convenient idea of god giving dominion over all animals.

  • @mouseycou well the animals still dont have the kind of inteligence you need to hate people only because they are different or got different opinions about things or feel the need to steal other people things because of greed or to kill somebody else for other reasons than food or self defense that humans have.

    If they did they probably would do the same kind of terrible things that humans do.

  • @CyberLance26 funny, many recent scientific studies would disagree with what you just said, especially in terms of greed, also in monogonous species it's not unheard of for animals to kill another in a dispute over a partner even after the first breeding season...nor is it uncommon for monogonous species females to sleep around with males that aren't their partners. Stealing is also a big factor in many animal species, you also get animals going so far as some animals being antisocial.

  • @mouseycou well in that case it proves that animals are just as evil as humans.

  • @CyberLance26 yes they are, other than the fact they don't destroy large areas of land and deplete every natural resource thinking they have a god given right to destroy everything in their path...closest to humans in that respect are ants, but atleast they still have a harmony with nature.

  • @mouseycou The only reason they dont do those things is because they cant do it and dont know how to do it.

  • @CyberLance26 but then, just because other animals don't do it, it doesn't mean those that do are any better. It is not necessary for our own survival to know and do many of the things we do, anything not required for a lifeforms continued existence is just useless knowledge. If you were to say a human is more knowledgeable than animals then you may be right, however then animals still know things we do not.

  • @mouseycou You're joking, right? Deer and herd grazers will strip a forest bare and then die of starvation if they overpopulate. Same with wolves and other predators. Locusts can destroy an ecosystem so completely that it takes decades to recover. Viruses and bacteria WILL consume until they or their hosts die. Even plants will find ways ways to choke out or even poison their competition (other plants).

    Humans aren't the only mass destroyers on this planet. Merely the most successful.

  • @udsuna Deer and her gazers are destructive, that is true, but they do maintain an equilibrium with the environment around them, something that humans fail to manage. In nature there is destruction for the sake of survival, for instance spontaneous forest fires allow woodlands to regrow, grazing allows certain plants to grow that may otherwise not have been able to do so. But still in the end a state of equilibrium occurs. As for Virus' it is debatable whether they are alive to begin with.

  • @mouseycou No... the do NOT "maintain equalibrium". That requires forthought and planning. They are balanced out by other forces, but you can't attribute any form of insight on the part of said deer in this process. Nature doesn't self-correct. It's not a balanced, harmonious force.

    It is chaos incarnate, running on violence and death. The only so-called balance is that everything's killing everything else so a decisive victory is impossible.

    Except humans. Because we skills. I guess.

  • @udsuna Equalibrium isn't something that requires planning, it just means that everything is able to exist hormonally in a balance which means that every species dies and grows at a sustainable rate hence meaning that in the long run every species has a chance of survival. If nature was not in equilibrium it would be impossible for many of the species that currently exist today to survive.

  • Bear vs. Bees

  • Animals My dear proffessor, did not have war but also did not have oatmeal!

  • Animals never had anything to go to war over.

  • @Treblaine Unless we count ants.

  • @Rykanable I guess they had something to fight for... the hive

  • You forgot snakes and mongooses.

  • Epic Deepak Chopra bullshit is epic.

  • Animals never argued on youtube. Who's the REAL animals?

  • @InsertYourBeliefHere Az a cat maiself, I can assoore yu, you iz quait rong on dat point LOLZ XD

  • @InsertYourBeliefHere animals were sent by the goverment to kill us

  • Animals never had a war?

    Lemme go outside and watch the two ant colonies on my driveway slaughter each other in what surely isn't a war...

  • @CoronaMage Ants aren't animals :P

  • @MichaelChin1994 yes they are classified as animals :P

  • @MichaelChin1994 Yeah, that's just a stupid thing to say.

  • @MichaelChin1994 (from Wikipedia)

    "The biological definition of the word refers to all members of the kingdom Animalia, encompassing creatures as diverse as sponges, jellyfish, insects and humans."

    Checkmate

  • @CoronaMage No, ant's don't go to war with each other.

    It's mutual genocide.

  • @CoronaMage

    As long as they don't use weapons of mass destruction.

    And I have never seen a bomb go of in a ant colonie. Maybe yours are different.

  • @DrunkenCoward1 lolwut? You can have a war without weapons of mass destruction.

  • @DrunkenCoward1 just thought id join the conversation for a moment to say that some species of ants puncture their abdomen and explode

  • @CoronaMage 15 people are retarded.

  • @CoronaMage Someone is taking a comedy show a little too seriously.

  • @CoronaMage Ants are insects, not animals.

  • @boredtodeath55 Animal - Noun - A living organism that feeds on organic matter, typically having specialized sense organs and nervous system and able to respond rapidly to stimuli.

  • @lmc100 You could've also said "Check Wikipedia"/"Google it"

  • Comment removed

  • @boredtodeath55 I saved you the trouble.

  • @CoronaMage their not animals their inscects

  • @CoronaMage not animals, insects

  • @d3str0i3r "animals" indicate the entire kingdom of nature. Insects are just another class of animals , just like mammals are another class.

  • @CoronaMage Ants are insects, not animals.

  • @Superbad1400 if it hunts for food it's an animal

    if it makes it's own food, it's a plant

    it's that simple, buddy

  • @Peaserist wow now i fell stupid. Thanks.

  • @Superbad1400 Insects are animals.

  • @CoronaMage Meh, ant colonies are hive minds, so it's like watching a quarrel between two individuals rather than a war.

  • Comment removed

  • @CoronaMage not with nuclear arms, you can't hug your children with nuclear arms

  • @tennis1219 *touch*

  • @tennis1219 You can't hug your children with claws either, therefore by your logic, every cat must be declawed :D

  • @tennis1219 ya the only thing that seperates us from animals is tools nuclear weapons and space travel but give animals the same intelligence they will have wars just like we do maybe even worse. the universe thrives on chaos with no chaos there would be nothing, no universe no life means no chaos the only thing that is true is time *ssszzzt*

  • @cdmaster35 CHAOS I SUCH A WONDERFUL WONDERFUL THING! 8D

  • @mantis1mike DisQord approves of your comment

  • @tennis1219 I feel like if I'd touch you, you'd die on contact

  • @aaronjs4 Sorry, I figured it would be a nice diversion and perspective (fight fire with fire, cartoon with cartoon). I mean, this isn't real life either but real facts of science within an animation environment, still works... :P

  • fck ppl im da best

  • What about the Lion King, the battle between the lions and the hyenas? That's a war between animals

  • @NightmareVF hes talking about real life, not disney movies

  • Monkeys form assassination teams and them AND ants war.

  • Monkeys form hit squads and them AND ants war.

  • this isn't explaining quantum mechanics, it's making fun of deepak chopra

  • @Guinness4h2o; O RLY?

  • @P5eudonym Correct, six thousand hules.

  • @facebuster101; False, six thousand hulls.

  • my only regret is that i have..... boneitus...

  • I AM TEH GREETEST!! 8D

  • Anything can happen at anytime for no raisin!

  • @Amenthatip

    for the sake of neutrality I am neutral about this clip.

  • don't you mean no raisin?

  • Kinda reminds me of that one line from Transformers......

  • guys this was a joke on a cartoon show. just laugh and move on.

  • Well the animal thing is true

  • @cringlator No, it's not. Ants and termites regularly go to war against other ants and termites. Social groups of apes will also occasionally fight each other.

  • CHOPRAAAAAA!!!!!

  • at last... IT ALL MAKES NO SENSE!!!

  • the universe is a chaotic thing...but theres always a reason why something happens...cause and effect....so thus the whole universe is a contridiction....for something can not be total chaos and have a system of order at the same time.....(soon after this post the universe implodes)

  • @VictorVonFox

    Whos to say that the effect cant happen before the cause?

  • @Deathowlhunter09 that doesnt make any sense unless time travel is used the effect is always after the cause

  • @VictorVonFox

    Time is always moving forward because we experience it as moving forward. Does that necessarily mean it IS moving forward, or does it simply mean that is the way we're wired to understand it?

    Our perception of the universe is highly limited. Example:

    All visible colors result from waves which are part of the electromagnetic spectrum. the colors aren't called visible because they're naturally that way all the time, they're called visible because human eyes happen to see them.

  • cont.

    There are many other parts of the electromagnetic spectrum which are "invisible" to us, but are visible to other animals. But we don't call those parts "visible" because WE HUMANS can't see them (for example, many snakes can see infrared waves as visible colors). So you start to see that even science, whose goal is to be objective and unbiased, often exhibits hard-to-avoid human biases.

    This may well be the case with time, which is often described as a series of places we move through.

  • @Npowell01 All things are different kind of wave lengths. Some we receive as sound, some as colors, some as thoughts.

  • Seems legit

  • So yeah, arguing on Youtube... I thought the video was funny. Anyone else?

  • @Amenthatip Die in a fire?

  • @Amenthatip aparently not, we've got another argument starting cuz someone wrote a long comment

  • The mathematics of one-time burrito meals.

  • Farnsworth has proven himself to be a bodybuilder here. "Eat plenty of oatmeal"

  • Which episode is that?

  • @JackOneil68 Movie: Bender's Game.

  • @JackOneil68 Wondering that myself, this is hysterical.

  • LOL Deepak Chopra...

  • Try r/bugwars

  • Ants have wars.

  • chimpanzee's sort of have wars with other chimpanzee's they just, and may I quote the great WKUK "were too stupid to have invented guns"

  • animals and humans are the same. Get over it. This is a joke. And you dont get it.

  • Fact: Animals do, in fact, have wars. Not all animals. Mostly Primates. I've heard about troops of Chimpanzees waging systematic war for territorial gain on other troops of primates. Yes, they kill each other.

  • Comment removed

  • Animals have wars all the time. Ant colonies, for example. Also, chimps have raiding parties which rip off opposing males' genitalia, and bear will often kill a mother's cubs to force her into estrus. Chopra is an idiot.

  • @TheChuchulainn I dunno...I love oatmeal.

  • @TheChuchulainn Men wars are different, mainly because it's not about survival, it's just an illusion named "power", the desire to rule and shit like that. Animals struggle only to make survival possible, and to avoid extinction. It's just Instinct, not greed.

  • @neemmesis If ants had the ability to use nuclear arms, the world would be dead in a couple of weeks.

  • @TheChuchulainn If humans had the ability to create with no intention to destroy, things like that would never exist

  • @TheChuchulainn maybe, maybe not... no one knows that. Besides, using nuclear weapons is not an ability, but destroying them is.

  • @neemmesis Umm... both using them and destroying them are abilities. Duh. Are you high?

  • @TheChuchulainn an ability requires some kind of skill. Killing your own people only needs hatred and greed. "Duh" aren't you smart enough to fight arguments without using phrases like "are you high"?. I know you can't. When people know they don't have good arguments to answer, they just use that kind of words. you don't have anything new for this chat, so this is the last time I answer your silly comments. Try to improve your argumentation skills, you'll need them in your life. Have a nice day.

  • @neemmesis Let me educate you. Using nuclear arms requires skill. Skill to program them, wire them properly, and plot a trajectory. Your view is narrow.

  • @TheChuchulainn Oh, now it all makes sense!!! thanks, you enlightened my understanding of the world, oh god thanks!!! now really, if you think that people (who wire, program and launch the trajectory) is the people who launch the missile, you are as wrong as Maxwell when he tried to dump the start of quantum mechanics. when an evil entity, say, a president of a big country (maybe with a flag with stripes and stars) ask the scientist (physics and chemist) to plot a plan to use science to make ...

  • @neemmesis an incredible abomination that could destroy the entire planet, and then asks the engineers to design and build that thing (lets call it "weapon"), promising them he will only use it to defend the interests of truth and justice (or whatever) who is the guilty one: the guy who discovered (or invented) the equations that rule the nuclear disintegration process, the scientists that used those equations to make an unstable system capable of liberate energy or the engineers that...

  • @neemmesis where able to make real all those theories and calculations? I think you know the answer, but let me put it clear. If you say "all those bastards are guilty 'case they plotted invented and created that weapon" you are being blinded by your hatred to science. 'Case they were only tools used by that guy in suit living like a king, in a house (maybe painted in white) thinking that he and only he knows who is right and who is wrong. Blaming the tools is the same as...

  • @neemmesis blaming uranium 238 for being THAT unstable. and if you notice the state of things of that country we are using as an example, you may say that a country that chooses an asshole like that must be in a, lets say, economical crisis? It's probable, if that country exists, that is passing through a crisis where everyone is blaming his neighbors, and not taking the responsibility. and again, thanks for enlightening me with your knowledge, oh great Chuchulainn

  • @neemmesis tl;dr

  • @TheChuchulainn I know, that's the better way to stop people like you, who just love to criticize without knowing anything. Have a nice day, sir.

  • i just watched this early today lol

  • Monkeys go to war.

  • Only humans and Ants have war. War is organised mass violence, so no He's half right, though how would we be the real animals if animals never have war?

  • @fistfulofknowledge Animals are still animals. But humans are monsters.

  • @50033836 The only thing which seperates humans from other animals is intelligence, not supposed notions of 'good and evil' We're no better or worse than animals, only more sophisticated and have different behaviour than different species.

  • @fistfulofknowledge And tanks. Don't forget tanks.

  • Ants war.