Added: 3 years ago
From: jaglavaksoldier
Views: 26,991
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (104)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • We cancelled the RAPier, now we got the RAPtor

  • This was the elusive Mach 3 super interceptor America NEEDED. With this aircraft the Soviets would never dare to threaten us with bombers ever again.  The YF-12 was another that should have been built, but no, McNamoron was a fool.

  • What a shame that this Plane never got built. I would rly liked to see some Videos from it and the XB-70 in a Formation Flight (:

  • Interesting is that the F-108 was to carry 4 20mm cannons and even bombs rather than being a pure interceptor thus was to be something like a multirole craft. However, it was rather underpowered and would not have reached high speed or good maneuverability.

  • The cancellation of F108 and B70 was a bad decision. ICBMs cannot be used even for deploying logistics to friendly soldiers due to their political sensitivity while the old B-52 will be used until 2030. It is very difficult to shoot down Mach 3 planes at high altitude, maybe only possible with S400 and later(our air force has S400 short range derivatives).or ABLs. Vietcongs would have had very hard time against both B70 and F108(with preprogrammed high alt/speed bombing)

  • @xxwzaebd The XB70 was cancelled because Air Force and CIA intelligence estimates showed that the aircraft would have been extremely vulnerable to the newest Soviet air defense systems, and therefore a waste of money. It was at that time that fast and high was replaced with fast and low. The XB70 couldn't do that trick.

  • Anyway,B52 and Tu95 are quite successful.

  • @xxwzaebd The US never had an effective air defense system, so that was not a consideration for the Bear, and the Soviets had already chosen their missles as their primary nuclear response. The B-52 on the other hand was adaptable to using stand-off weapons (the XB-70 was not). The B-52 was also already in service, and would not have cost millions more to become an effective weapons system. Plus, neither aircraft ever attempted the same kind of performance as the XB.70.

  • @jamiegottagunATyahoo: Exactly. Hence the swing-wing B-1, which could go low altitude as well as high.

  • @xxwzaebd You don't have a f-ing clue what you're talking about.

  • You don't have a million f-ing clue not ony what you're talking about but also what you're thinking or doing about. Everyone including me knows and does more than you ever can imagine and thus you are merely an unuseful entity,nothing else. As such, you are nothing but arrogand and assuming-ti-know-ebverything while you are in fact good for nothing at all. Evn the kindergarten kids here for whom their parents spend $1000 monthly fo education are better than you. So stop writing useless things.

  • Of course, you now wanna argue about some typing errors-that's what all of the unuseful entities around the world do all the time. Nobody cares about you, nobody listens to you. So, while it's too late, start doing something with marginal useful value, like cleaning the front door or picking up some autumn leaves. Then you will start being of marginal usefulness, but I am afraid this will be very far from now. I feel sad to realise something made you a spoiled kid; everyone is better than you.

  • @xxwzaebd The reasons behind the cancellation of the XB-70 are well-documented, in dozens of military aviation books; Why don't you turn-off the computer for a little while and try reading some of them, instead of refusing to accept that you're wrong?

  • I have only written some opinions, nothing else. The XB-70 and others are not worth mentioning more than that since the global economy now evolves around much larger industries than aviation and defence.However, you started calling names and devaluing others while you yourself are not as good as some schoolchildren who are much better talented and educated than you. You are unuseful, face this fact. My job is related to computers and other equipment and unlike you, I am productive. So go away.

  • Besides, tell others like those working in finace or industry to turn off their computers which run 24/7/365 for decades. Unlike you, these machines generate corporate profit and are in charge of safety. Even the tiny microcontrollers do more productive things than you would ever achieve. The world can live without planes anyway since they will be replaced by vacuum tunnel trains. So the whole thing is not that much worth arguing. Anyone is better than you are.

  • @xxwzaebd It's nice that a little retarded boy like you can get on the computer and converse with adults the way you do. You go boy!

  • @xxwzaebd Surely you are joking with the comment "Vietcongs would have had very hard time against both B70 and F108(with preprogrammed high alt/speed bombing)" FAC's directing bombing attacks against Viet Cong or NVA only wanted A-1's, A-4's, A-37's, B-57's or (later) A-7's to drop the ordnance. None of the fast jets (F-100, F-105, F-4) were as suitable for close support as the slower types. F-108 and B-70 would have been wholly insuited to actions against Viet Cong.

  • @TheGuilherme1999 It wasn't just aircraft. A lot of weapons systems of different kinds that REALLY had potential were canceled because of the politicians' stupidity. Weapons systems that, in Russia, would've never been canceled.

  • @TheGuilherme1999 I don't think that it was so pricey that they couldn't afford it. It was the lack of political will that killed this airplane. The Russians were only dreaming to have the capability to build such an aircraft at that time and the US politicians rejected it. This clearly show how stupid the anti-military US politicians r.

  • it resembles the A-5 vigilante carrier based bomber. family likeness

  • Just another of many BIG losses for the US military. But these innovations, that were not used by the US, were lately studied by the Russians and incorporated in their own designs. This aircraft was far ahead of its time and was generations ahead of everything the Russians had at that time. Just like the Valkyrie bomber, which was another huge loss. All these, thanks to the US politicians stupidity.

  • if that plane was built i wonder how will it performance against MiGs over Vietnam.

  • They only canceled it because the Air Force cut the XB-70 program. The F-108 was supposed to escort the B-70 and be a long range interceptor.

  • @disturbedone5009 So they made two HUGE mistakes: they canceled two truly revolutionary designs that would've given the US air force HUGE capabilities. The Russians would've not dared start the Cuban missile crisis if these aircraft would've been operated by the US air force. Also, the rail garrison based Minutemans would've been a huge strategic advantage over the soviets. But I guess the US politicians had to show their stupidity in all its glory.

  • @StiviGun1

    The XB-70 was not worth the cost. Missiles were becoming faster so the main advantage of the Valkyrie was beaten by much cheaper missiles.

  • @disturbedone5009 How much do you want to bet that if the Russians would've had the technology & resources 2 built such a plane in the '50s, they would've done it? The XB-70 was far ahead of its time & every single military official, including Curtis Lemay, were in favor of adopting it. It was the stupid politicians who didn't have any type of knowledge abt weapons that canceled it. That aircraft would've given the USAF a huge strategic advantage. Just take in consideration 1 thing: if they were

  • @disturbedone5009 able to make it so advanced with 1950s technology, just imagine what upgrades they could've give it during the course of time. By rejecting the XB-70 & the XF-Rapier, the US has ruined the best plane designer America has ever had. The Valkyrie could've been improved 2 fly at much higher speeds & altitudes. It could've been used 2 strike selected & moving targets that the ICBMs couldn't. Its potential was huge. The Kennedy adm was the only that couldn't see this.

  • @StiviGun1 Actuall the XB-70 could not have gone any faster. The SR-71 was the fastest plane in the world and it had to be built of titanium to withstand the heat. The XB-70 airframe would have melted if it had gone faster.

    As usual you have absolutely no fucking idea of what you're talking about.

    BTW you fucking retard Kennedy was long gone by the time to XB-70 had its maiden flight. RETARD.

  • @Jospehporta U're so stupid. If they could make it reach mach 3 using 1950s technology, of course they could have make made it reach much higher speeds. U're just too stupid 2 understand that. As usual, u only show how stupid & uninformed u r.

    As 4 Kennedy, he canceled the XB-70 project 4 the 2nd time, after he based he campaign on it. If it hadn't been canceled during Eisenhower's term, the bomber could have been ready, even if only in some limited numbers for the Cuban missiles crisis.

  • @StiviGun1 Still using crappy spelling and grammar I see. You're a very slow learner......lol of course I forgot you're a gypsy.

  • @Jospehporta I can't use SPELLING when I'm writing stupid. Spelling is something that you use when you talk. Damn, you're mother gave birth to a stupid animal.

  • @StiviGun1 He didn't base his campaign on the XB-70 you dumb shit. It's hilarious how you make up history. You're an idiot.

  • @Jospehporta It was one of the things that he based his campaign on, you dumb shit. Go learn history, you socially rejected loser.

  • @StiviGun1 NO it wasn't you fucking idiot and stop copying me. Get some originality you fucking pathetic gypsy. You're an idiot who once again shows he knows nothing about history and especially America,

  • @Jospehporta Yes, it was u stupid shit. Go learn history, u fucking idiot. God, your cow of a mother gave birth to one stupid animal. Go read the wiki article on the subject. That should educate u a little, u dumb shit. Damn, you're stupid.

  • @StiviGun1 My god you're stupid, well it's just another thing I've proven you wrong on, AS USUAL :)

  • @Jospehporta The wiki article, as well as other articles on the net prove I'm the one who's right,.u stupid shit.

  • @StiviGun1 This is how retarded you are. First off you insult people for using wiki, when it is obviously your primary source. Then you don't even understand what the article says because you're so incredibly stupid. Kennedy mentioned the XB-70 ONCE, you idiot. His election campaign wasn't based off it. YOU ARE FUCKING STUPID and I've schooled you again.

  • @Jospehporta U stupid. 1st of all, I never insulted anybody 4 using wiki. & 2nd of all, Kennedy DID BASE his campaign on this bomber. It was because of his promise of restarting the project that they wasted 800 millions on the program. And after he became president, he, like a whore that he was, canceled it. Where the hell did u get that "ONCE" bullshit from, stupid? Wiki doesn't say that, on the contrary, it's just that u're too stupid 2 understand even a simple article from wiki.

  • @StiviGun1 Inn fact that was your primary insult...."you're so stupid, you use wiki". You said that dozens of time. Also you;re too stupid to even understand what the wiki articles even mean, even though they are written so morons like you can understand them.

  • @Jospehporta Yes, stupid, I called YOU and idiot because the only source u're able 2 use is wiki, not other people, just YOU. U really r stupid.

    As 4 the wiki article, it clearly says how the whore, Kennedy used the XB-70 bomber 4 his campaign, he made the USAF 2 spend 800 millions on it & then he canceled it. Wiki says this VERY CLEARLY. U're just too stupid 2 understand even such a simple article.

  • @StiviGun1 LMAO oyu really are stupid, he mentioned it once at a very small speech. Gotta love how stupid you are, you can't even understand simple articles on wikipedia. you;re a typical dumb as shit gypsy.

  • @Jospehporta You really are so stupid. Because of him, the USAF spent 800 million on the XB-70 program and after that hs canceled it. The XB-70 was one of the most important things be based his campaign on.

    "he mentioned it once at a very small speech" Where does it say that, stupid? Do you have a link, a proof? Of course you don't, you're just a pathetic socially rejected loser that wastes his time harassing people on YT> Damn, you're stupid.

  • @StiviGun1 LOL you really are too stupid to understand simple English. Kennedy did not base his campaign on it as you've claimed.

    You really are a shit stain on YT.

  • @Jospehporta You stupid shit, you can't even read a simple wiki article. Read the wiki article on it, you moron. Kennedy based his campaign on this bomber HEAVILY. Are you that stupid that you can't even read a wiki article?

  • @StiviGun1 As I said you can't read. No surprise there and what you can read you can't interpret. It was never a MAJOR part of his campaign as you assert, he mentioned it once on a speech during his campaign LMAO.

  • @Jospehporta Yes, it was stupid. Kennedy caused the USAF to lose 800 million dollars on restarting the XB-70 program. So this bomber was a VERY IMPORTANT part of his campaign. You're just too stupid to understand a simple wiki article.

  • @StiviGun1 Also the XB-70 couldn't maneuver very well at Mach 3 and was a sitting duck for 1960's era Soviet SAM's not to mention later generations. couple that with the fact it needed a lot of titanium and guess who the main supplier was......Russia. I've schooled you again.

    So your stupid fantasy about the XB-70 being some super weapon is without any basis as usual.

  • @Jospehporta What I know is that all military officials, including Curtis LeMay the head of the SAC RECOMMENDED this bomber. I trust them more than a stupid harassing troll that has no life and because of that he harasses people on YT.

    BTW , stupid, the XB-70 reached mach-3 WITHOUT having any titanium parts in it. It was build from aluminum alloy in a honey comb shape. Of course, a loser like you has no idea what that means. There you go, I taught you something new AGAIN. U got OWNED again.

  • @Jospehporta What's even funnier you stupid piece of shit, you got this from Wikipedia, LMFAO. You have the brains of a goldfish and only ever get your info from wiki. PATHETIC.

  • @Jospehporta I got this info from many sources, not just wiki, wiki is just something I recommended you, because I know you're too stupid to find other sources. Anyway, you're wrong on on the subject, you've been owned. Now go kill yourself, you stupid lifeless loser.

  • @StiviGun1 Complete bullshit you got it from wiki and that's it. You play the same game every time :)

  • @Jospehporta Wiki doesn't talk bullshit, stupid. Besides, u were totally off when you talked about how the XB-70 wouldn't be able to dodge SAMs. U were also totally off when you talked abt how it couldn't reach mach-3 and I totally schooled you there. In fact, you were wrong about everything, all you do is keep maintaining a stupid argument just so u can have the last word, because in real life, u're STUPID LOSER who gets stepped and spit on by everybody. U're fucking pathetic.

  • @StiviGun1 Gee funny considering how you abuse people for using wiki when it proves you wrong. I never said it couldn't reach mach 3 and this is the first time you've mentioned it. SO you're making up bullshit as usual.

    A Mach 3 plane could still easily be shot down by 1960's Soviet era missiles which is why the SR-71 never overflew Russia.

    SO I have destroyed you once again. It's incredibly easy to prove you wrong. Why do you think everyone calls you STIVIDUMB :)

  • @Jospehporta I never abused"people" 4 using wiki, I only showed how stupid u r 4 using wiki as the only source, stupid.

    As 4 the XB-70 if it was allowed 2 evolve, by 1960s, it would've been able 2 reach mach-3+ speeds and it could have dodge soviet missiles. It would've been much better at this than the B-52, anyway, which is still in service, stupid. The generals and Curtis LeMay didn't recommend this bomber for nothing, you moron.

  • @StiviGun1 LOL typical lies and bullshit form you. You used to love to belittle people for using wiki when it proved you wrong all the time. Also once again wiki proves that you are full of shit or just plain illiterate.

    It isn't your fault you were born a stupid gypsy. BTW ethnic studies have shown gypsies have the lowest IQ of any race in Europe, so I guess it really isn't your fault you were born stupid.

  • @Jospehporta No, stupid, I only showed how stupid YOU are for using wiki as your only source. Your lies are pathetic and show how stupid, desperate and pathetic you are. Damn, your mother cracked a stupid animal.

  • @Jospehporta I mean crapped. STUPID.

  • @StiviGun1 LOL you;re the one correcting yourself, so you;re obviously calling yourself stupid, which we all know you are.

    I destroy your pathetic comments EVERY time.

  • @Jospehporta The only thing you destroy is you, stupid, by showing people how STUPID you are.

  • @StiviGun1 LOL as usual I prove you completely wrong and you only have some lame comeback.

  • @Jospehporta What did you destroy me on, stupid? I proved you wrong on everything you said. All you do is come up with stupid insults every time you get owned. You're so fucking stupid you're mother should have killed you when she crapped you.

  • @StiviGun1 I have destroyed you on everything especially what you said about Kennedy. You're such a fool and easy to expose. That's why you're called STIVIDUMB.

  • @Jospehporta Actually, STUPID,. I have destroyed you on everything, in specially on how Kennedy used the XB-70 to boost his campaign. You're so stupid you can't even read a simple wiki article. I have destroyed you on everything, You're just too stupid.

  • @StiviGun1 Yeah, you tried to write your typical bullshit and I exposed you as always. Pathetic. You;re just a dumb ass gypsy who I always easily prove wrong.It's funny how much of a hard in you have fo America and you;ll never be able to come here.

  • @Jospehporta No, stupid, I showed you wrong on every stupid statement you've made. U couldn't prove any of your statements. You only make stupid,. free statements, everyone can see that. You're the stupidest piece of shit I've ever seen.

  • @StiviGun1 LOL you're an idiot, still trolling YT I see. Funny thing is I prove you wrong everytime you type something. You are the epitome of a retarded gypsy. You are a compulsive liar.

  • @Jospehporta U're such a pathetic piece if shit. I see that u're the same loser with no social life. U're nothing but a pathetic piece of shit who, at 30 years old, still lives in his mom's salary.

  • @StiviGun1 Do you ever stop crying kid? LOL well you're 27 and act like a kid.

  • @Jospehporta Actually, stupid, I'm 25 and at least I don't live on my parents salary, like you do. You really are a pathetic piece if shit.

  • @StiviGun1 In fact you do live with your parents, that much is obvious. You don't have a job or even own a computer, you have to go to an internet cafe. You're just another poor stupid gypsy.

  • @Jospehporta Actually, stupid I don't. I work as a translator for a big company in the city of Timisoara. U're the loser that lives on his parents salaries, like a stinking parasite and follow people on YT. That's all you do, U sit at your computer and follow people on YT, starting the stupidest arguments I've ever seen. Damn, you're a pathetic lifeless loser. Go kill yourself, you pathetic failure.

  • @StiviGun1 LMAO so firstly you bullshit about having 2 psychology degrees, which I destroyed you on and now you're a translator. If that is the truth which is highly doubtful that company is in a lot of trouble considering most of the time you can't understand simple English on YT. LMAO.

    Funny how you just made up this job, I can't stop laughing.

  • @Jospehporta I do have 2 degrees in psychology (that's how I know that you're a socially rejected failure) and I do work as a translator. You, on the other hand, are nothing but a pathetic loser that at 30 years old still lives on his parents money.

  • @StiviGun1 Ahh the psychology degrees bullshit. You've been shown many times not to know the first thing about psychology, especially basic terminology.

    You love to make up BS which you can never back up. You say the same shit over and over again. You so desperate.

  • @Jospehporta Oh, but I do have 2 degrees in psychology. I figured you out perfectly. U're nothing but a 30 years old loser who has no social life and spends all his time on YT following people around. That's a very sad life you're having there. You should just go kill yourself, really.

  • @StiviGun1 You describe yourself perfectly, now stop projecting your life onto me. You do understand what that means, it's basic psychology using basic terminology. LMAO of course you don't, you don't know the 1st thing about psychology. IDIOT.

  • @Jospehporta No, stupid, that you. everybody that you start stupid contradictions with can see that. It's obvious that u're an unemployed 30 years old loser who still lives on his parents money, otherwise, you wouldn't spend so much time on YT for such stupid arguments and following people around and stalking them. You're definitely a socially rejected failure, that's obvious for everybody. Go kill yourself, loser.

  • @StiviGun1 As usual your rantings don't make any sense. Your English is very poor, translator my ass. LMAO.

  • @Jospehporta Yeah, stupid, I work as a translator, not a parasite living on my parents money, like you.

  • @StiviGun1 I live how you invent jobs and degrees all the time. Your English is hopeless, you must be working for a shit company if they use you as a translator, LMAO.

    Of course you don't really have a job anyway.

  • @StiviGun1 LOL you don't live off your parents because they're too poor to support you, You live off government welfare instead and troll YT from an internet cafe. You're really funny but also incredibly pathetic.

  • @StiviGun1 This is how stupid you are, it is well known Le May wanted the Air Force to be the #1 force in the military so he recommended everything. This just shows how little understanding you have and how stupid you are.

    You're just another stupid gypsy, how typical.

  • @Jospehporta U stupid, i contradict urself without even realizing. "Le May wanted the Air Force to be the #1 force in the military so he recommended everything" If the XB-70 was no good, then why would Curtis LeMay recommend it, stupid? If it wasn't good then it couldn't have made the air force #1. That's how stupid you are. YOu contradict yourself without even realizing. Damn, you're a stupid monkey.

  • @StiviGun1 "U're so stupid. If they could make it reach mach 3 using 1950s technology, of course they could have make made it reach much higher speeds." - stividumbass

    LOL another fucking stupid comment from you. The SR-71 still holds the world record for an air breathing plane and it's 2011. Where is this magical technology you talk about you fucking moron.

    As usual you write useless bullshit you have no idea about. You have no idea about friction or materials fabrication.....IDIOT.

  • @Jospehporta U're a moron. The XB-70 was designed in the 1950s & it reached mach-3. That was before SR-71, stupid. Now, if they could make it reach that speed with 1950s technology it's perfectly logical 2 assume that they were able 2 make it reach even higher speeds as the design evolved. Designs ALWAYS evolve.

    As 4 the SR-71, how do u know it never overflew the USSR stupid? Its missions r mostly secret? So how does a stupid monkey like u that it never overflew the USSR? Stupid.

  • did not know

  • What a shame, this would have been America's super jet of the Cold War, much like the TSR.2. Fast, powerful and able to keep the "Ruskies" in their place!

    I'd at least like to see this mighty jet in a flight sim!

  • Another case of good opportunity that was lost.

    A promisser plane that deserved to be airborne.

  • very true indeed

  • Did I hear that right Fly 1,000 miles, launch a missile, be back in a half an hour (i.e. 2,000 miles in a half hour). 

    It was designed to fly at 4,000 mph? Is that for real?

  • I think he meant 30 minutes after delivering it's air-to-air salvo, it would fly 1000 miles back to base and land (i.e: 2000mph). Poor choice of wording, yes.

    (The Rapier was to have had a top speed of 1980mph).

  • Could you imagine how Aerospace Defense Command would've looked back in the 1960's? North American F-108s and Lockheed F-12s, teaming up with Convair F-106 Delta Darts and McDonnell F-101 Voodoos, and the Canadians with their CF-105 Arrows chasing away Soviet bombers.

  • If the F-108 would have been built, there would not have been a YF-12... the YF-12 was built because the F-108 was not built...

  • speed and range

  • @CVKent317: Except the YF-12 never went into production either.

  • It would literally have made us an impenetrable fortress. Too bad it never came to fruition.

  • @fulcrumSMT29: Could you imagine how Aerospace Defense Command would've looked back in the 1960's?

    JM: How could you leave out "The Greatest of Them All" ? The XB-70.

  • Dude awesome!! A Forgotten aircraft! Good stuff!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more