Added: 3 years ago
From: walmartwatch
Views: 3,764
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Follow Roehm V Walmart Stores, Inc. and write letters to Rob Walton for answers.

  • It has been opposed for almost 10 years. Keep track of Dukes V Walmart ----------- BETTY DUKES; PATRICIA SURGESON; EDITH ARANA; KAREN WILLIAMSON; DEBORAH GUNTER; CHRISTINE KWAPNOSKI; CLEO PAGE, on behalf Nos. 04-16688 of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross- Appellants, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellant/CrossAppel­lee. ----- Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 222 F.R.D. 137, 141-42 (N.D. Cal. 2004).

  • I came to this video because of the recent supreme court ruling that said discrimination against women is just fine. All I can say is what the fuck?

  • what sources do you have to support your claim of gender discrimination in walmart, im dying to see it. in fact large chain-store operations like walmart and target have been known to have a higher female-employee rate even though men make up most of the workforce. So ur claim that walmart discriminates against women is in void

  • sexests grrrrrrrrrrrrrr

  • there were men in the background

  • Don't get it. lol

  • screw walmart!!!!

  • ????

  • momtourage eh?

    wow

  • That's some seriously cheeze shit.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more