Added: 3 years ago
From: captxxchaos
Views: 97
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Thats it i'm subscribing!

  • thanks for the sub!

  • snif snif beutiful

  • thank you!

  • Nice song very original sound! Like it alot sincerely NOMIS

  • thanks for viewing!

  • kinda reminds me of Puddle of Mudd's acoustics, except a bit mor unique.

  • thank you my friend!

  • Tock, tock, tock - that part was sweet. I like the chord progression of the verses.

    It sounds like with a full band the interludes would be one of the more intense parts of the song, but on your own I think it might sound cool with more of a fast picking. Instead of the heavy strumming, that is.

  • workin on a fast picker as we speak (type) thanks for the input!

  • Another idea I just came up with is to only do Bm-E twice in the intro, instead of Bm-D-E the second time. That way, when you go to D in the verse it is a nice surprise.

    If you do that, you don't need the little pause after the intro. In fact, eliminating the pause will bring the intro and the verses together making the listener hear three straight Bm-E progressions. Then, the use of the D will be an even bigger surprise.

    Let me know if I'm overstepping my bounds here.

  • certainly not, what i do here is just for fun, and i appreciate any at all input, ive acutally wrote it originally with just those two chords in the verse, but it was too boring, so when i get brave with this audacity program i have ill give er a shot, easier to solo over as well, not much, but still easier... thanks again

  • Just to be 100% clear, it is only the intro that I think the D should be dropped from, not the verses.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more