seems legit. they do ship gas over great distances. they are right that we would need all sorts of energy resources to sustain energy demands of the world. what is everyone bitchin about?
Exxon mobil is the biggest piece of crap in the world they basically say. How to produce as much oil and gas as we can. So exxon can be rich. If you look for example at Shell they have at least things like the eco marothon, shell fuel save and they warn about the future. Ofcourse shell is not perfect as well. But exxon doesnt even allow reactions on youtube they are scared to get bad publicity.
I want to educate people. We need the energy companies like Exxon provide. Theres no doubt that its polluting and that its not sustainable. But they give it to us because we ask for it. It makes no sense to buy gasoline or anything containing plastic and then say "screw the oil companies". No sense at all. You can say "Fuck Exxon" but if you think you have a rational argument, please bring it and I will shut you down. Or if you are the one in a million, you'll teach me something. Win-win.
We need to stop using natural gas, period. Any 5th grader can tell you that it's a stupid idea to rely on a finite resource for energy (fossil fuel). Nice looking commercial, but we aren't fooled.
My point is always the same - do the head honchos of Exxon Mobil want wells in their backyards. If they ever say yes to that then maybe we can begin to trust them.
When they talk about oil sands in America, the America they are talking about is N. America or more specifically Canada. We is not North America. We is the United States.
@dkw12002 Actually, we IS North America. North America is our entire continent which also happens to include Mexico. South America is also a continent which includes the country of Brazil and 11 others. So before you try and sound smart, you might want to look at a map. Also, the tar sands you are referring to ARE located in Canada, but would be shipped via an underground pipe system which would run beneath the middle of the United States and pollute the living shit out of our water supply.
@breathemetal76 Obviously, but the ad is dishonest because the only country with America's interest at heart is America...not Canada and not Mexico. Thank's for the 4th grade geography lesson though.
Nothing more than propaganda by the oil industry. They get this natural gas by using the proven unsafe method of hydraulic fracturing. Watch "Gasland" for more information.
@steelheadvalley I have to call shenanigans on this....... The way I see it, Natural gas is cheaper to produce, and can be applied to all sorts of energy demands, plus I can keep my dodge avenger.
Extracting Liquified Natural Gas through "Fracking" is on track to make 40% of the U.S. Toxic. All the gas in the world won't help you if you can't drink the water!
Solar, wind power, thermal heating, electric vehicles.
It is up to the individual person to take the initiative of converting to these forms of renewable energy. You just have to make an effort. Your grand children will thank you.
@renovatio1988 "If you can do better?" Who here, posting on you tube, has the means to create a giant oil company and "do better." Corporations like ExxonMobil have a social responsibility to do better. What kind of world will this be, when the most powerful companies destroy the world's environment and economy, and our response is say, "you do better."
@kris7780 I am not asking for a corporation. I am not asking you to actually perform. I am asking for ideas, plausible ones. "Social Responsibility"? Yes. But not more (proportionally speaking) then you do. You see coming on the internet and trash talking is so simple. But what if you were in the power seat. Rex's. Or other project managing/research and developing positions? What would you do? Where would you head the firm? You got a world to supply with gas, that's getting bigger really fast.
@renovatio1988 People come on here to express a demand for action by corporations and the government, and to inspire others to do the same. I'm sure there are people who are much smarter than I am, who could tell you what specific things could be done. Big corporations have the means to impact the world in a big way, for better or worse. There is only so much an average person can do when you consider the current expense of change.
@renovatio1988 (continued) Hybrids and solar panels don't come cheap. How many people do you suppose can afford a new car or a house, much less a "green" car or a house with solar panels. In addition long commutes are sometimes a must when jobs are scarce, adding to the unavoidable consumption of oil. I respect the need for individual responsibility, but taking resources and impact into account, I think those with the power and the means need to take the lead.
Joe Weissman is an ass clown. He stated that a professor asked him 30 years ago if he "wanted to change the world". He then states he's been growing algae for 35 years. Well, 35 years and you haven't come up with anything yet? At this rate, can we look forward to algae fuel in perhapes 350 years? I can't wait! ExxonMobil is on the case!
So all of you guys don't like driving your cars, using plastics, and pharmaceuticals? You are all morons. Exxon's profit margin is below 10% and their executives don't come anywhere close to the top execs in the country. So we shouldn't like Exxon because they provide an affordable energy dense transportation fuel and chemical feedstock and have en exceptional environmental record? Yep, that makes sense. Those bastards! Look at how much Exxon spends before whining about how much they earn
@BarcyDeck1 Not with somebody else's cock. "Clean" natural gas? Everywhere from Wichita Falls down to Austin they've been Fracking the rocks and polluted the water supply for the entire area. Every lake there is toxic now, and people have actually lit their well-water on fire. Neither Exxon nor any of the other companies involved are paying Texas Utilities to offset the cost of filtering out their toxins from OUR water. The People have to pay, the people have no say. that's the Exxon Way
Im really like Prof Weismann commercial about algea. Everybody is trying to get ridd of it, well we try to grow it and they are actually beautifull. theyve come in green red golden..
Really? We're still going to need coal, oil and nuclear power when a combination of solar, wind, geothermal, and tidal power, properly harnessed, is enough to supply all the needed power in the world a million times over? Yeah I don't think so. Hopefully one day soon the world will wake up. When that happens, good luck selling sunlight, waves, and the wind, motherfuckers.
Sounds misleading in many ways. Not just making fossil fuels clean, it also makes them pretty much essential ("we need them all", "to bring more energy to more people" as if transported liquified gas was extremely important). The imaginery is strong: carbon atoms aren't depicted "the usual dirty black balls" but "nice bluish clean bubbles", basic chemical formulas are shown to make it look more professional and the work of the company "above the ordinary people". Superb ad with putrid morals.
The ad is misleading only in the context that they weren't specific enough. It is a relatively clean burning fossil fuel: NGVs have lower emissions than hybrids, for example.
There's definitely a bit of PR spin there, but not all of it is BS.
SECRET OF THE SEVEN SISTERS
tazabinegn 1 month ago
Guys, I'm from Russia. Here Exxon is very small)
I don't understand, why you hate Exxon?
IgorShkarin 2 months ago
@IgorShkarin watch the video SECRET OF THE SEVEN SISTERS
tazabinegn 1 month ago
@tazabinegn thanks, I will.
IgorShkarin 1 month ago
seems legit. they do ship gas over great distances. they are right that we would need all sorts of energy resources to sustain energy demands of the world. what is everyone bitchin about?
mintoo2cool 4 months ago
Exxon mobil is the biggest piece of crap in the world they basically say. How to produce as much oil and gas as we can. So exxon can be rich. If you look for example at Shell they have at least things like the eco marothon, shell fuel save and they warn about the future. Ofcourse shell is not perfect as well. But exxon doesnt even allow reactions on youtube they are scared to get bad publicity.
musiclovers1940 5 months ago
I want to educate people. We need the energy companies like Exxon provide. Theres no doubt that its polluting and that its not sustainable. But they give it to us because we ask for it. It makes no sense to buy gasoline or anything containing plastic and then say "screw the oil companies". No sense at all. You can say "Fuck Exxon" but if you think you have a rational argument, please bring it and I will shut you down. Or if you are the one in a million, you'll teach me something. Win-win.
harvinsi 6 months ago
@harvinsi what about the cost that other countries pay for your gas and petroleum... or i guess that means nothing to you...
tazabinegn 1 month ago
blah blah blah, Fuck up nature in those environments, our climate, and our future. Exxon all the while gets rich. To be continued.
mmxcrono 6 months ago
We need to stop using natural gas, period. Any 5th grader can tell you that it's a stupid idea to rely on a finite resource for energy (fossil fuel). Nice looking commercial, but we aren't fooled.
LaMilby 6 months ago
My point is always the same - do the head honchos of Exxon Mobil want wells in their backyards. If they ever say yes to that then maybe we can begin to trust them.
claudelebel55 6 months ago
When they talk about oil sands in America, the America they are talking about is N. America or more specifically Canada. We is not North America. We is the United States.
dkw12002 6 months ago
@dkw12002 you is illiterate.
XxDarkJonesxX 4 months ago
@dkw12002 Actually, we IS North America. North America is our entire continent which also happens to include Mexico. South America is also a continent which includes the country of Brazil and 11 others. So before you try and sound smart, you might want to look at a map. Also, the tar sands you are referring to ARE located in Canada, but would be shipped via an underground pipe system which would run beneath the middle of the United States and pollute the living shit out of our water supply.
breathemetal76 3 months ago
@breathemetal76 Obviously, but the ad is dishonest because the only country with America's interest at heart is America...not Canada and not Mexico. Thank's for the 4th grade geography lesson though.
dkw12002 3 months ago
Frack you Exxon!
Naddia49 7 months ago
When fire comes out of your water faucet and burns your face off, you'll see the true viability of fracking. {{-_-}}
Suitsnappy 8 months ago 2
this is bullshit
RainbowMichael 8 months ago
Nothing more than propaganda by the oil industry. They get this natural gas by using the proven unsafe method of hydraulic fracturing. Watch "Gasland" for more information.
WildBill6942 8 months ago
@steelheadvalley I have to call shenanigans on this....... The way I see it, Natural gas is cheaper to produce, and can be applied to all sorts of energy demands, plus I can keep my dodge avenger.
JessFromMead 9 months ago
huh? wth was this.
x3michaeladz 9 months ago
and all the wars around the globe break out for this company
mechanicalengineer54 9 months ago
natural gas adds nutrients like methane distillates. If you drink enough of them- you won't have to worry about retirement- it will prevent old age.
thefredsays 10 months ago
Extracting Liquified Natural Gas through "Fracking" is on track to make 40% of the U.S. Toxic. All the gas in the world won't help you if you can't drink the water!
scrib132 10 months ago
Why is this misleading? That is there aim... Whats the problem?
edyronaldomartins 1 year ago
Solar, wind power, thermal heating, electric vehicles.
It is up to the individual person to take the initiative of converting to these forms of renewable energy. You just have to make an effort. Your grand children will thank you.
RedRager1 1 year ago
Easy to talk shit about exxon, and sure they have their share of evils but if you can do better have at it.
renovatio1988 1 year ago
@renovatio1988 "If you can do better?" Who here, posting on you tube, has the means to create a giant oil company and "do better." Corporations like ExxonMobil have a social responsibility to do better. What kind of world will this be, when the most powerful companies destroy the world's environment and economy, and our response is say, "you do better."
kris7780 9 months ago
@kris7780 I am not asking for a corporation. I am not asking you to actually perform. I am asking for ideas, plausible ones. "Social Responsibility"? Yes. But not more (proportionally speaking) then you do. You see coming on the internet and trash talking is so simple. But what if you were in the power seat. Rex's. Or other project managing/research and developing positions? What would you do? Where would you head the firm? You got a world to supply with gas, that's getting bigger really fast.
renovatio1988 9 months ago
@renovatio1988 People come on here to express a demand for action by corporations and the government, and to inspire others to do the same. I'm sure there are people who are much smarter than I am, who could tell you what specific things could be done. Big corporations have the means to impact the world in a big way, for better or worse. There is only so much an average person can do when you consider the current expense of change.
kris7780 9 months ago
@renovatio1988 (continued) Hybrids and solar panels don't come cheap. How many people do you suppose can afford a new car or a house, much less a "green" car or a house with solar panels. In addition long commutes are sometimes a must when jobs are scarce, adding to the unavoidable consumption of oil. I respect the need for individual responsibility, but taking resources and impact into account, I think those with the power and the means need to take the lead.
kris7780 9 months ago
0:09 LOL "in an environmentally friendly way"
ecologist96 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Joe Weissman is an ass clown. He stated that a professor asked him 30 years ago if he "wanted to change the world". He then states he's been growing algae for 35 years. Well, 35 years and you haven't come up with anything yet? At this rate, can we look forward to algae fuel in perhapes 350 years? I can't wait! ExxonMobil is on the case!
7188181 1 year ago
So all of you guys don't like driving your cars, using plastics, and pharmaceuticals? You are all morons. Exxon's profit margin is below 10% and their executives don't come anywhere close to the top execs in the country. So we shouldn't like Exxon because they provide an affordable energy dense transportation fuel and chemical feedstock and have en exceptional environmental record? Yep, that makes sense. Those bastards! Look at how much Exxon spends before whining about how much they earn
Thaydawg 1 year ago
FUCK EXXON
BarcyDeck1 1 year ago 28
@BarcyDeck1 Not with somebody else's cock. "Clean" natural gas? Everywhere from Wichita Falls down to Austin they've been Fracking the rocks and polluted the water supply for the entire area. Every lake there is toxic now, and people have actually lit their well-water on fire. Neither Exxon nor any of the other companies involved are paying Texas Utilities to offset the cost of filtering out their toxins from OUR water. The People have to pay, the people have no say. that's the Exxon Way
JonahtheFigPucker 9 months ago
whats the name of this song?
sonyvaio980 2 years ago 6
For a fuckin' bookworm ... Claudia is ;)
KillerTurk2391 2 years ago
Comment removed
UmmahTube 2 years ago 7
@UmmahTube natural gas is very clean. (read the great energy transition it will be good for you)
Jack10163815 1 year ago
Im really like Prof Weismann commercial about algea. Everybody is trying to get ridd of it, well we try to grow it and they are actually beautifull. theyve come in green red golden..
Like this guy :-)
TheDutchways 2 years ago
Anyone know the music in this advert, Sounds nice, I want it, not interested in the advert at all.
Ketomorphik 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
UmmahTube 2 years ago
Misleading?? who cares, Claudia.... fit!
chuchuchapman 2 years ago
@chuchuchapman She is quite attractive. They deff chose her to appeal to men.
neurocytohemotoxic 1 year ago 3
PV=nRT..... lol
3dlegoman 2 years ago
lol... hai guyz we look smart nao, heres teh gas law thats lets us make liquid stuff, LOL buy our stuff nao plox/.
LegendaryMotives 2 years ago
It looks funny at this commercial, but ideal gas law is closely connected with liquefication natural gas
kloosek 2 years ago
Really? We're still going to need coal, oil and nuclear power when a combination of solar, wind, geothermal, and tidal power, properly harnessed, is enough to supply all the needed power in the world a million times over? Yeah I don't think so. Hopefully one day soon the world will wake up. When that happens, good luck selling sunlight, waves, and the wind, motherfuckers.
ChrrristianGP1981 2 years ago
who cares I'd believe anything Claudia was saying! ;op
murphydonal7 2 years ago
That's why they chose her!
conradecek 2 years ago
afghanistan=natural gas
iraq= oil
moehaddad1 2 years ago
and here is the answer : /watch?v=4ql38W-vduM&feature=channel_page
/watch?v=i_bJoG5Jq-M&feature=channel_page
or go to /user/AvaazOrg for more Infos
Drschuh10719 2 years ago
Sounds misleading in many ways. Not just making fossil fuels clean, it also makes them pretty much essential ("we need them all", "to bring more energy to more people" as if transported liquified gas was extremely important). The imaginery is strong: carbon atoms aren't depicted "the usual dirty black balls" but "nice bluish clean bubbles", basic chemical formulas are shown to make it look more professional and the work of the company "above the ordinary people". Superb ad with putrid morals.
Endel86 2 years ago
What song is playing in the back round?
EnglishBull08 3 years ago
yea, its nice iwanna make a video w/ this song
hometownkid 2 years ago
The ad is misleading only in the context that they weren't specific enough. It is a relatively clean burning fossil fuel: NGVs have lower emissions than hybrids, for example.
There's definitely a bit of PR spin there, but not all of it is BS.
Harrower13 3 years ago
Claudia is pretty.
Hidratszint 3 years ago 2
R u kidding me shes freaking hott, I dont care if she is a geek, ill take her.
NBTOclan 3 years ago
lul and people woulda beleived em too
kankouro82 3 years ago
Its not misleading, she is a good looking woman
ukbirdflu 3 years ago
The devil runs a PR campaign.
frankodelic 3 years ago
The dictionary definition of greenwashing
frankodelic 3 years ago