Ron Paul in the Huffington Post - wimps out again

[FukFoxNews]

Yeah nice way to side step the real point he was making. The REAL issue isnt what he said when and how can he prove that we were lied to and all that. The REAL issue is WTF are we doing there!! And now you can say, "lame ass argument explaining why we are in iraq and afghanistan probably based on misinformation and LIES" Oooh the terrorists hate us cuz we are free bullshit.

[Bhanna4d]

This guy is an idiot. Why say this to a staffer. This lady just answers phones.

Stupid!!!! and Worthless!!!!!

[CANTvoteHillary]

Your YouTube Channel is

STUPID!!! and WORTHLESS!!!

BTW thanks for watching..

[Bhanna4d]

Thats funny are you joking?

Your welcome

[corymd3470]

Ron Paul has consistently blamed the neocons.

Read his speeach on the house floor July 10, 2003 entitled "Neo CONNED !"

[wingsuitfreak]

He doesn't need to address the specifics as they have been public knowledge for so long. If you don't know who he is referring to, then guess where your head has been for the last 8 years.

[farhadcoyote]

Search for this video on youtube.

"Ron Paul names Neo-Cons on House Floor July 10 2003".

It will address a lot of our concerns that you mentioned in this video

[Ralphdraw3]

Did Cheney lie in his speeches about Iraq?

Should Cheney have been impeached?

Did Bush lie in his speeches about Iraq?

Should Bush have been impeached?

Did Condi Rice lie in her statements about Iraq as National Security Adviser? Is Rice a NeoCon?

Did Albert Gonzales lie in his testimony before Congress? Is Gonzales a NeoCon? Should Gonzales have been impeached?

[welkinator]

This is just stupid. I might support your views if you had any coherent thoughts. And your other vids are just as bad - no facts, can't remember facts, unprepared when you turn on the camera, unprepared when you called Ron Paul's office ("I had another question, I just can't remember it.") Just plain stupid.

Sorry

The WELKINATOR - applying a thousand tiny cuts to the stupidity threads in the fabric of social and political discourse.

[CANTvoteHillary]

Hey, Hotshot Welkinator

You Make a super-excellent video... and post it at your channel!!!

I went to your channel. You ain't got nuttin..

[zjroyall07]

Ralph, I think it's pretty safe to say considering all the videos you've made about ron paul that you have a huge man crush on him, which is ok.

[Ralphdraw3]

And I have a crush on all the legions of Paul-heads at YouTube as well... they are so "passionate", however newfound it is .... Besides, they help my view counts!!!

I assume as well, however, that the Paul-heads did absolutely nothing in the 2004 election (kind of like their fearless leader).

[farhadcoyote]

Search for this video on youtube.

"Ron Paul names Neo-Cons on House Floor July 10 2003".

[Ralphdraw3]

BTW - Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Abrams, Cheney go all the way back to the REPUBLICAN presidencies of Nixon, Ford, and Reagan.

They are nothing "new" or "neo"

[wrdjunk]

In most states, it is illegal to record a telephone conversation without the explicit permission of all who's speech is being recorded. Unfortunately, there are no specific laws against recording a telephone conversation badly. Then again, maybe the noise and distortion was more intellectual than electronic.

[CANTvoteHillary]

Turn me in to the New World Order and they will arrest me...

[Spectre11B]

I dont get your point. It's a matter of deductive logic. Ron Paul believes that the reasons to go to war were fabricated. Therefore, anyone who constructed the reasons to go war is lying.

What is so difficult to understand here?

[CANTvoteHillary]

W-H-O did the fabricating?????

And should T-H-E-Y be held to ACCOUNT????

[Spectre11B]

It's all conjecture but he is still allowed to vote his conscience.

You act as if people can not have an opinion if it doesnt hold up in a court of law. In fact, most Americans believe (according to polls) that we were misled into Iraq. I happen to be one of them.

However, given history, trying to convict a President of anything is an extremely difficult task. They always retreat to plausible deniability which has almost always worked in the past.

[CANTvoteHillary]

WHY can't Ron Paul - the Prophet/ Seer/ Shaman say,

"It appears that President Bush and Cheney lied to the nation and to Congress about Iraq. But we can't do a thing about it.... because lying to Congress in speeches isn't against the law or against the constitution or a violation of the oath of office."

[Spectre11B]

Because to accuse someone "specifically" requires definitive proof. It requires an investigation to know exactly who was complicit and who was subject to faulty information or degrees of both.

This act requires a majority of Congress to initiate an investigation. He has already stated that he would support such an investigation, and would call for impeachment if evidence corroborated guilt.

I hope this answers your questions.

[Ralphdraw3]

Nope.. it doesn't...

Who lied - specifically? Did Bush and Cheney lie? etc..

you Paullites are wimping out in this question of "lying" and impeachment etc..

[Spectre11B]

You didnt even address my point. Start the investigation and we will tell you exactly who is lying.

[CANTvoteHillary]

Ron Paul said that there were lies.

Those are his words.

My question for Ron Paul is, simply, Who lied???

Re: an investigation,

Is Ron Paul - officially - calling for an investigation of the lies? I haven't heard this from Doc Paul before...

or am I supposed to do an investigation from my YouTube channel??

[Spectre11B]

You're asking me?? I thought you were supposed to be the expert?

Took me 5 seconds btw - /watch?v=3hLVhgm_glc

He has always stated that he supports a judicial investigation because our laws demand that you are innocent before proven guilty.

However, Ron Paul believes this administration misled us into war, either deceitfully or haphazardly. Regardless, belief alone isnt enough to impeach anyone. You need an investigation which can only be approved by the majority.

[CANTvoteHillary]

I thought you were the expert on Ron Paul.

I am surprised that none of the Paulites can tell me whether George Bush lied or not;

or whether

Bush and Cheney should have been impeached.

"HAPHAZARDLY"?????????????

ARE YOU JOKING??????

You have just WIMPED OUT - major wimp out....

sad

[Spectre11B]

It's only sad to you because you have chosen to make that a priority in the central theme of your argument.

You never asked Ron Paul or anyone else for that matter, if that was their agenda. What is most ironic is that you have consumed most of your energy doing nothing, when you could have run for office and tried to impeach Bush yourself.

The problem is you never really understood what Ron Paul was ever about. Changing government from the ground up is what we want.

[ty99999returns]

also ron paul is saying lots of people lied, from all over, ur an idiot to ask such a dumb question thats so simple that the lady doesnt even know if u joking or not. lie as in the 9/11 commision report was a lie, and much more.

[capitalistinside]

Hey! You didn't say specifically what George Bush, Donald Rumsfield, etc. lied to us about and in detail! You, sir, are a very, very bad man! How dare you wimp out on us YouTubers?! The next time you make a video don't make any "omissions" about what we were lied to about when somebody lies to us!! ARE YOU LISTENING TO ME!!!! HA! HA! HA! HA!

[Ralphdraw3]

I'll do a Ron Paulesque response:

"Somebody" lied to us about "something" and we ended up in Iraq...

duh.............

[CANTvoteHillary]

REPOST:

I'll do a Ron Paulesque response:

"Somebody" lied to us about "something" and we ended up in Iraq...

duh.............

[zzzDiamondzzz]

dude you have to get a life. He voted for the impeachment ......do some research and stop harassing his office

[CANTvoteHillary]

dude,

he didn't vote for impeachment in 2004,

he didn't vote for impeachment in 2005,

he didn't vote for impeachment in 2006,

he didn't vote for impeachment in 2007,

he did not sponsor or co-sponsor ANY BILL of impeachment

dude..

[FriendOregon]

ACTUALLY HE DID!

[CANTvoteHillary]

You're lying - Ron Paul opposed impeachment.

Paul said there wasn't enough evidence and suspicion to call for impeachment.

Ron Paul did, however, support impeaching Clinton for lying about a blowjob..

[FriendOregon]

Nancy Pelosi opposed impeachment and she was one of the leading democrats at the time....

TALK ABOUT WIMPING OUT! something smells in the dems camp....

will anyone pay for the crimes of Bush.... no under the dems... you will see...

[theGimmer]

Oh great, here he goes again yelling at the poor Ron Paul office girl. Pathetic.

Have you ever seen Ron Paul's speech on the House floor titled "Neo-conned"?

You are a whiney blowhard who somehow figured out how to hook up your microphone.

What magic are you going to whip up for us next?

Maybe you can badger the ghost of Ronald Reagan for saying "Mr. Gorbechev, tear down this wall!"

What wall? The Great Wall of China? The Wailing Wall? He wasn't SPECIFIC!!! How dare him!

[CANTvoteHillary]

Is George Bush a neo-con? how about Cheney and Rumsfeld???

Do you have direct quote from Ron Paul saying that George Bush and Dick Cheney lied to the nation and the Congress ????????????????????????

BTW:

Ronald Magnus Reagan - the King of Deficits???

LOL