@unowen7951 retard, really? what? cause i prefere another great player over another? cause i have an opinion. I don't actually like Federer, he's just plain and boring, i don't go round shoving it in peoples faces, cause he is a great player. if anyones a retard here, which I doubt, it's you. just because Murray doesn't go for every shot doesn't make him terrible compared to anyone, there's no denying he's also a great player.if anything,when Murray gets going and goes for shots,he's unbeatable.
@mackensie2212 also, arguably, Murray has the best backhand on tour many current players have said this. oh, and i hardly think, thinking someones ugly is a reason to hate them, nor contributes to him being "terrible".
I'm a huge Agassi fan. I would have loved to see him play Nadal at both of their peaks. Unfortunately it never happened. Nadal beat a game Federer 6-1 6-3 6-0 in a Roland Garros final. Do you think Agassi would have taken more games than Fed did? Federer is the second best clay courter of our generation. Nadal on clay is/was more unbeatable than anyone on any surface in history.
that's the kind of point you could see only when players like federer and safin are playing each other. players that play to win the rally, not make their opponents lose it like nadal, djokovic and murray
Do you atleast know the difference between a two-handed backhand and a single-handed backhand?Federer never ever used a two-handed backhand in his entire life!!!That is one of his aspects which makes his tennis look so graceful.Don't mess with Federer's forehand or backhand!
How is he overrated? Federer has won more slams than Sampras and Fed owns the career slam something Sampras never came close to achieving. 2004-2007 Federer dominated the game like no one has ever before. He's not as dominant as he was but he's still number one and has won 3 of the past 5 grand slams, and been the finals to the two others he didn't win. So with that in mind how can you say he won't win a slam next year? Murray didn't even get to a grand slam final this year.
STFU nostradamus, no one comes close to matching federer's consistency on all surfaces. it took 2 all-time performances from nadal and del potro to barely deny federer a calendar slam when he was supposedly in a slump. there isn't a shot he hasn't hit. the only better single bh is gasquet's. how is he overrated? actually don't answer that, i don't really want to hear from you again.
@demondayzzz Gasquet hits a harder, spinnier backhand, but I don't know if I'd class it as "better." I would say Federer's backhand (though weaker than the rest of his game) is still pretty top-notch because of how he can hit things even without that gigantic wind up that Gasquet has..
yeah most of you that think you are great at predictions also thought that this year federer wont win a single slam and we all saw what happened. so instead of making a fool of yourself why dont you just sit and watch what happens and then make your comments
Worst comment ever.Federer is widely considered as the greatest of all time.If you knew anything about tennis you would know that Federer dominated his era more than any other male player in the game. in 2006, he reached 17 finals out of the 18 tournaments he entered, and guess what,he won 13 of those. 90-5 record at the end of the season.From 2004-2006, Federer won 7 out of 12 slams.From 2004-2006, Federer had a 247-15 win loss record. 237 consecutive weeks world number 1.These are only a few.
@adronias Hardly anyone wins slams in Federer's era because, um, Federer wins them all (and the ones he doesn't win are won by Nadal).
The implication of weak competition until 2008...lol...men's tennis was weak as fuck from 2001-2003 when Sampras fell off...and now you're going to say 2004-2007 were weak, too? For 6 years, the world just stopped producing quality tennis players? Give me a break.
And in the late 90's, fucking Magnus Norman was #2 in the world for a while.
@Zozim57 totally agree with you!! but to improve those stats, i must correct you and say that federer won 8 out of the 12 grand slams played betwenn 2004- 2006. Even better, he won 11 out of the 16 grand slams played between 2004-2007, having reached 13 of those finals!!. 6 grand slams in 8 in 06/07! there is no arguing he is the best ever. its is a shame tough he lost his consistency. i hope he cant get it back! 90% of the observers say he is the best ever. they say that if he didnt exist,
@Zozim57 players like roddick, hewitt, safin, nalbandian or davydenko would have dominated the game and won many grand slams each! he was there to stop them. After the 2005 us open final, Agassi said that throughout his career he would get upset with his losses, but that in that final he lost to a better player! he only played sampars, mcenroe, edberg, lendl between others... ddoes anybody need anything more?
@danteblaze14 and? agassi played nadal many times and never said that. if he had played nadal in roland garros maybe he could say something like: "today i lost to a better player... on clay". i mean during the us open quarter finals in 2004, when federer was playing agassi, you could hear a mcenroe comment about RF: " thats why you look at a guy like this and say to yourself this could be the greatest playe that ever lived". during us open 2004, federer was only beginning and had 3 GSlams!
@amesquitaPT Agassi played Nadal many times? Agassi played Nadal only two times. One was at the Montreal Masters 2005 Final and the other one was at Wimbledon 2006 3rd round. Agassi was basically playing with a bad back and one leg in the those years.
FEDERER TOTAL IDIOT
ivantrajce89 3 weeks ago
erm, Murray's backhands better than Federer's.
mackensie2212 2 months ago
@mackensie2212 Are you kidding?...
unowen7951 1 month ago
@unowen7951 no.
mackensie2212 1 month ago
@mackensie2212 Then you must be retarded. I'm sorry but Murray is annoying, ugly, and is terrible compared to Federer.
unowen7951 1 month ago
@unowen7951 retard, really? what? cause i prefere another great player over another? cause i have an opinion. I don't actually like Federer, he's just plain and boring, i don't go round shoving it in peoples faces, cause he is a great player. if anyones a retard here, which I doubt, it's you. just because Murray doesn't go for every shot doesn't make him terrible compared to anyone, there's no denying he's also a great player.if anything,when Murray gets going and goes for shots,he's unbeatable.
mackensie2212 1 month ago
@mackensie2212 also, arguably, Murray has the best backhand on tour many current players have said this. oh, and i hardly think, thinking someones ugly is a reason to hate them, nor contributes to him being "terrible".
mackensie2212 1 month ago
What year was this?!!
ArjunJethwa 2 months ago
@ArjunJethwa 2005 Australian Open
mfcsocten 2 months ago
safins plan in this match consisted of 2 things.
1. hard to feds backhand.
2. when going to feds forehand always have him running for it.
butterflycaught900 2 months ago
240 p we meat again :@:@:
dark1951 3 months ago
so which pixel is the ball???
Vaggos93sk 3 months ago 4
federer looks so much lighter on his feet on these videos. its a shame how even the greatest age.
chrism216 5 months ago
@chrism216 I've noticed that too. He is stil quick but in his prime he was like a rabbit the way he hopped around the court.
zdlore1985 3 months ago
Just say God of tennis, love you Roger :)
87Logitech 8 months ago
green court + green ball + youtube video = epic quality :P
SpEeDyZTiTaN 9 months ago 7
@SpEeDyZTiTaN well....the ball is yellow...but you are right ;)
seidl01 7 months ago
I'm a huge Agassi fan. I would have loved to see him play Nadal at both of their peaks. Unfortunately it never happened. Nadal beat a game Federer 6-1 6-3 6-0 in a Roland Garros final. Do you think Agassi would have taken more games than Fed did? Federer is the second best clay courter of our generation. Nadal on clay is/was more unbeatable than anyone on any surface in history.
danteblaze14 10 months ago
Best baseline rally ever :D
UltimateTopspin 1 year ago
that's the kind of point you could see only when players like federer and safin are playing each other. players that play to win the rally, not make their opponents lose it like nadal, djokovic and murray
mitroveca 1 year ago
Great rally, poor quality :(
kibk8al 1 year ago 2
wen nalbandian is on his best game his backhand is a lil bit better i think.
TJFederer15 2 years ago
Safin's 2 handed backhand is a dream, well it was.
Arhaych90 2 years ago 5
why o why would he hot dog on match point
butterflycaught900 2 years ago 3
Out of this world tennis!
Leejungwoo48 2 years ago
great vid, but the commentary is for a different point haha
blobby123asdqwer 2 years ago
Overrated!? God. Federer might be the best tennis player ever walked the earth. Maybe the best Athlete of all times as well.
Zizousebba 2 years ago 4
amazing technique by both great semi final =( shame federer lost but still is one of the greatest rallies i've ever seen
gaboalejo123 2 years ago 4
so with training you can play like Safin or Federer. Yeah.
valerioevonde 2 years ago 4
this is no magic.
this is traning.
Andrzej14414 2 years ago
lol i cant even see the ball
MrSnausage 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The greatest my arse.
WittenbergP 2 years ago
Check your eyes man......
petrosk4 2 years ago
is it just me..or is federer using two handed backhand?
wussok 2 years ago
just you.
shushyman2 2 years ago
Do you atleast know the difference between a two-handed backhand and a single-handed backhand?Federer never ever used a two-handed backhand in his entire life!!!That is one of his aspects which makes his tennis look so graceful.Don't mess with Federer's forehand or backhand!
RFedex0808 2 years ago
Comment removed
adronias 2 years ago
And he's still number 1!
xenero 2 years ago
Comment removed
adronias 2 years ago
a promise; next year after federer wins a slam ill send you this message; "told you so"
butterflycaught900 2 years ago 4
How is he overrated? Federer has won more slams than Sampras and Fed owns the career slam something Sampras never came close to achieving. 2004-2007 Federer dominated the game like no one has ever before. He's not as dominant as he was but he's still number one and has won 3 of the past 5 grand slams, and been the finals to the two others he didn't win. So with that in mind how can you say he won't win a slam next year? Murray didn't even get to a grand slam final this year.
zdlore1985 2 years ago 4
STFU nostradamus, no one comes close to matching federer's consistency on all surfaces. it took 2 all-time performances from nadal and del potro to barely deny federer a calendar slam when he was supposedly in a slump. there isn't a shot he hasn't hit. the only better single bh is gasquet's. how is he overrated? actually don't answer that, i don't really want to hear from you again.
demondayzzz 2 years ago 45
@demondayzzz Gasquet hits a harder, spinnier backhand, but I don't know if I'd class it as "better." I would say Federer's backhand (though weaker than the rest of his game) is still pretty top-notch because of how he can hit things even without that gigantic wind up that Gasquet has..
asdfuogh 3 months ago
Comment removed
vivu3450 2 years ago
yeah most of you that think you are great at predictions also thought that this year federer wont win a single slam and we all saw what happened. so instead of making a fool of yourself why dont you just sit and watch what happens and then make your comments
mitroveca 2 years ago 2
Worst comment ever.Federer is widely considered as the greatest of all time.If you knew anything about tennis you would know that Federer dominated his era more than any other male player in the game. in 2006, he reached 17 finals out of the 18 tournaments he entered, and guess what,he won 13 of those. 90-5 record at the end of the season.From 2004-2006, Federer won 7 out of 12 slams.From 2004-2006, Federer had a 247-15 win loss record. 237 consecutive weeks world number 1.These are only a few.
Zozim57 2 years ago 83
Comment removed
adronias 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
People need to stop speculating and start to show some real facts!
Zozim57 2 years ago
Comment removed
adronias 2 years ago
@adronias Hardly anyone wins slams in Federer's era because, um, Federer wins them all (and the ones he doesn't win are won by Nadal).
The implication of weak competition until 2008...lol...men's tennis was weak as fuck from 2001-2003 when Sampras fell off...and now you're going to say 2004-2007 were weak, too? For 6 years, the world just stopped producing quality tennis players? Give me a break.
And in the late 90's, fucking Magnus Norman was #2 in the world for a while.
ApologyToDOM 1 year ago
@Zozim57 Right on.
JnDproductions34 1 year ago
@Zozim57 totally agree with you!! but to improve those stats, i must correct you and say that federer won 8 out of the 12 grand slams played betwenn 2004- 2006. Even better, he won 11 out of the 16 grand slams played between 2004-2007, having reached 13 of those finals!!. 6 grand slams in 8 in 06/07! there is no arguing he is the best ever. its is a shame tough he lost his consistency. i hope he cant get it back! 90% of the observers say he is the best ever. they say that if he didnt exist,
amesquitaPT 10 months ago
@Zozim57 players like roddick, hewitt, safin, nalbandian or davydenko would have dominated the game and won many grand slams each! he was there to stop them. After the 2005 us open final, Agassi said that throughout his career he would get upset with his losses, but that in that final he lost to a better player! he only played sampars, mcenroe, edberg, lendl between others... ddoes anybody need anything more?
amesquitaPT 10 months ago
@amesquitaPT Agassi never played Rafa in a Roland Garros Final... I have a feeling Agassi would have said something similar after a match like that.
danteblaze14 10 months ago
@danteblaze14 and? agassi played nadal many times and never said that. if he had played nadal in roland garros maybe he could say something like: "today i lost to a better player... on clay". i mean during the us open quarter finals in 2004, when federer was playing agassi, you could hear a mcenroe comment about RF: " thats why you look at a guy like this and say to yourself this could be the greatest playe that ever lived". during us open 2004, federer was only beginning and had 3 GSlams!
amesquitaPT 10 months ago
@amesquitaPT Agassi played Nadal many times? Agassi played Nadal only two times. One was at the Montreal Masters 2005 Final and the other one was at Wimbledon 2006 3rd round. Agassi was basically playing with a bad back and one leg in the those years.
davd1986 10 months ago
@Zozim57
he won 8 out of 12 in that time, and 11 out of 16 through to 2007
stretch90 5 months ago
@adronias
it is now 2010 and fed has won the Aus Open. You are an idiot.
pmo1983 1 year ago
@adronias you relize that murray has never beat him in a slam and del potro is coming back from wrist surgery and a run in with depression right?
moffettman02 1 year ago
woooooooow
seidl01 2 years ago
Great Rally
Kingportable 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
dude im sorry but how the fuck is this amazing??
mat2997 2 years ago