Added: 3 years ago
From: Maxwell4Truth
Views: 1,706
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • what a BULLSHIT! That was a Controlled Demolition!

  • @ferchosarmy MORON....FUCKING MORON

  • look at 1:22 ... the antenna collapsed first... it was the first thing to sink before the rest of the building as follows... this means there must have been severe damage to the CORE... forget the trusses, the CORE was damaged. You can see smoke being blown from the top of the building before any smoke is blown out of the "impact" zone. It's hard to see cause it's within a split second. Watch closely... Antenna goes down first, building rubs against impact line, falls into it, then collapses.

  • @RetroHead92 your so right, spread the word

  • @ferchosarmy FUCK OFF

  • COTROLLED DEMOLITION.

  • @Hotters70601ben

    Quite right. Many architects, including myself, did not know that the cores of the WTC towers were as robust as they were. The cores practically constituted buildings in themselves.

    The cores of the WTC towers were virtually "buildings within buildings."

    When we later learned how solidly constructed they were, the official "pancake theory" fell apart.

  • @Hotters70601ben

    The amazing thing is how the initial shock left so many architects such as myself susceptible to the official "explanation."

    But as the months and years went by, we were able to mull over the traumatic events of that day.

    The inconsistencies began to pile up and forced us take a second look.

  • 0:41 to 0:47 showing the "pancaking" myth unwittingly reveals how absurd it is.

    It unwittingly shows that the interior core consisting of a dense matrix of massive steel columns and beams, would have been left sticking up in the air.

    It unwittingly shows that the "pancaking" would have resulted in a huge stack of nearly 100 "pancakes" at ground level.

    Alleged "pancaking" unworthy of term "theory," or even "hypothesis." It can only be termed a myth.

    Verdict? Controlled demolition.

  • Let's see, the MSM assures us that the WTC towers collapsed because the connections between the exterior columns and the trusses failed.

    No, scratch that. The WTC towers collapsed because the connections between the exterior column and the trusses didn't fail.

    No, scratch that. The WTC towers collapsed because the connections between the exterior column and the trusses failed.

    No, scratch that. The WTC towers collapsed because the connections between the exterior column and the trus-

  • Sehr gut!

  • Seems reasonable

  • bullshit - fuck NIST. I guess the fire in WTC 7 called the BBC to let them know that the building was going to collapse a half hour in advance - helpful warning since a steel-framed skyscraper had never collapsed as a result of fire but three did on 9/11

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more