Added: 4 years ago
From: lanehart
Views: 31,719
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (183)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This game is shared? That is stupid.

  • lol Sportscenter looks funny in this.

  • I saw that LSU team and I saw that USC team, I think LSU was better / more deserving.

  • USC DOMINATES COLLEGE FOOTBALL BABY!!!

  • THE forecast from the great and wise GREYMOOSE for this next football season: 2012 + GREYMOOSE + MATT BARKLEY = National Title returning to Los Angeles where it belongs. HAPPY NEW YEAR from the great and all-knowing GREYMOOSE of USC!

  • This video reminds me of how much USC used to get their cock sucked by the media back then. That LSU defense would've exposed Matt Leinart for the shitty overrated QB he really was/still is to this day.

  • @TideatMileHigh I hate to say it but....back then usc was stacked with talent!!!

  • to everybody who is doing all this talk about USC would have beaten LSU then, tell me one thing where is their USC team now? They are paying for what they did back then... GEAUX TIGERS!!!

  • Yeah you think USC would have won against LSU hahaha. apparently you havent realized that the best team in that whole conference OREGON...tried to beat LSU. And guess what happened...the SEC prevailed again. And yeah USC fucking cheated in recruiting...that goes to show you that money got those players in...not the fact that they wanted to go there. Come back to me when someone makes a valid argument about the SEC...because there are barely any.

  • After time has passed we all now realize this LSU team would have killed USC.. that entire LSU defense made it to the NFL and held teams to 10.2 pts p/game.. and that USC offense was racking up points against weak pac-10 Ds.. as we see overrated Leinhart and Bush.. and it wasn't until recent years Pete actually was able to build a real defense.. but back in '03 and '04 they were poor on D.. and '04 AU would've rolled USC too w/ Brown and Cadillac.. SEC rules and the record clearly shows that!

  • USC was robbed of the national championship by giving it to SATAN and LSWHO that year. USC would have torn LSWHO a new one had they played.

  • Bob Stoops is 1-3 in BCS National Championship games for a reason: he CHOKES.

  • i remember watching this game loved it

  • Only thing I know is, LSU got the trophy.

  • Comment removed

  • LSWHO should not be allowed to play a national title game in its own back yard. This is a travesty. No shame down there. Too bad those CAJUNS are still around.

  • @greymoose1000 but USC gets to play in the rose bowl how many times? which is even more of a backyard game

  • @MrZachAT The real game that represents class and greatness! The Trojans and the Rose Bowl represent all that is right with the world! Another factoid from the great and wise GREYMOOSE of USC! It is a good thing that the intellectual and rational people of California can offset the Idiot Cajuns from LA!

  • @greymoose1000 except for the fact that i live in the pacific northwest?

  • @MrZachAT Then you are truly fortunate!

  • LSU was a beast that year. 2003, 2007 the National Championship was played in the Superdome. I have a feeling were gonna win it this year.

  • sammy sosa lol

  • USC played the same OU team and blew them out by nearly 60 points. No way in hell would this LSU team have stood a chance against USC. LSU is a one hit wonder and will never have the prestige of OU or USC. Enjoy your retarded coach Les Miles...HA HA!

  • @edelweissnpa .........It wasn't the same Oklahoma team. It was a different year. Oklahoma was better in 2003 then in 2004. One hit wonder? The facts show otherwise.

  • @edelweissnpa One hit wonder? So the other NC means nothing right? Plus the year we "shared" the championship your team was cheating.

  • @edelweissnpa First of all no one really knows who would have won. OU lost their conference championship by a sizable margin to Kansas State that year. So in all probability, USC should have been in the National Championship game against LSU. Geaux Tigers!!!

  • @edelweissnpa

    university of spoiled children

    usc

  • @edelweissnpa we may not be as "prestige" as those 2 programs that you name, BUT how many times as of late Oklahoma has choked in a big game situation starting with this one and everybody seen what has happened to USC. Prestige nonetheless but OVERRATED as of LATE!

  • lol I forgot how terrible Stuart Scott was at broadcasting. I'm not a huge LSU fan, but yeah, they would have beaten USC that year. Just look at their defense, it was one of the best in history.

  • so now being that bush got his heisman stripped ima guess they should have there "share" stripped

  • @JWB225 thats correct

  • kirk hatin on us as usual.

  • See you in a bowl in a few year USC lulz.

  • All of this old stuff really does not matter. What the HELL is USC doing today? Lol, that's what I thought. Geaux Tigers!!!!

  • USC would have been murked. LSU was way too strong, and USC had a weaker defense than OU.

  • no more split championship the university of spoiled children got what they deserved

  • i rember this shit and even since that game i liked lsu just i hated jason white.

  • #1 played #2 this is the it supposed to be LSU BCS NCs ...who did #3 USC played #4 team??

  • Comment removed

  • @mitenpat So his means LSU is true 2003 BCS NC Winner they played #1team... not #4 or whatever USC played.

  • @2r3notgoodas1 It was a terrible year. LSU and USC both lost regular season games while OU lost to KSU in the big12 championship game. Thanks to the computers, OU was in the BCS game but lost their Championship game. It should have LSU vs USC.

  • @mitenpat LSU would have still won vs USC in the DOME.

  • @2r3notgoodas1 They would have had great home field advantage but USC was the team of the decade and that team could hang with anyone. Basically what I am saying is: it is not that simple.

  • @mitenpat Hey i have common sense too.i know what you mean 03-06 to me USC was practically college football. but LSU in 03 i think would have beating them.

  • @2r3notgoodas1 I am not saying you don't have common sense. That team won one national champ, won half of another (what we are talking about), and had the best player of decade will his team to victory. That Rose Bowl was the best game of the decade. Both teams were stacked with pro talent. All I am saying is that it is not a slam dunk issue.

  • heisman trophy winner goes 13-37 for 102 yards? wow

  • sammy sosa lolololol

  • FUCK USC TROJANS

  • its funny how usc cheats and gets robbed of a make be leave tittle. to mention a heisman .1982 i watched lsu beat the ignorance out them . well i just thought was some over rated media team like it was . sec dont play favorites like usc found out that night.

  • its funny how usc cheats and gets robbed of a make be leave tittle. to mention a heisman . in 1982 i watched lsu beat the ignorance out them

  • USC fans, as you can tell, LSU went up against a much better OU team, and we beat them without having to pay for your players. you should try it sometime, it feels great to win off talent that actually wanted to come to our school.

  • OU played LSU and then USC for the national title the following year.  LSU struggled and only won by 7. USC, on the other hand, dominated and put up 50+ on the same OU team...with the addition of Adrian Peterson! USC was without a doubt the better team over LSU. Also, USC dominated every SEC team by at least 40 points leading up to this season. Auburn was killed and shutout back-to-back against USC before their undefeated season. LSU will never be a football powerhouse.

  • @edelweissnpa theres no point in comparing teams from different years..

  • @edelweissnpa You're an idiot. You're talking about 2 different years and 2 different teams. Not to mention that your win doesn't count anymore. Ha.

  • We're holding the crystal ball. Not USC. Tell me whos #1?

  • How come LSU never gets any love for teams of the 2000s decade?

  • USC won the title just like Gore won the presidency.

    .

    USCemen-suckers should stop sniveling.

    .

    Auburn does not whine about 2004. They got on top of VT and sat on their lead. Just as they would have tried to do against any team. They would not have lost to USC 19-55, that is for sure.

  • Only a LUSer would be so deluded - there was never any dispute - coaches, reporters, and broadcasters all knew that USC was THE national championship.

  • @63utuber there is no dispute that the national championship trophy for 2003 is in Baton Rouge, Louisiana! There is only one of these trophies given out per year; the 03 trophy is where it belongs, with the TRUE national champs. The opinions of all those people you mentioned do not matter and don't change the location of the trophy. You lose (but you probably won't recognize it)

  • I dont know why people say this wasn't the right match up. This was a great game! 21-14 is a great championship score. I think OU did great for playing the damn Sugar Bowl. That's a damn home game for LSU.

  • USC whinedfor a share of the National Championship, yet when 2004 season came around when USC won the NC title Auburn didn't get a share of the Championship even though they went undefeated.

  • Depending on the NCAA investigation's findings, this may not be a "shared championship" much longer. And as far as Auburn goes - They barely beat a 2-loss Virginia Tech team in the Sugar Bowl while USC had a 30+ point win over then undefeated Oklahoma. Sorry Aubie...

  • @yurintroubl yeah, Auburn barley beat VTech in the Sugar Bowl but that was ONLY because Auburn didn't play in the NC Title game against USC. If Auburn played in that NC Title game they would've gave it all that got.

    USC whined for a share of the NC Title from LSU while Auburn on the other hand didn't whine for a share of the title from USC.

  • "We don't want to be here" is a poor excuse for poor play... and trust me - I understand that concept completely. Both my purple teams (LSU & TCU) were not playing to potential in their bowl games this past season. Uninspired play is excruciating to watch as an understanding fan, probably more so as a voter. FWIW - I kinda give TCU a pass this once b/c it was the 1st BCS game for the players AND coaches. Lessons learned. Atonement ahead. Hopefully this year. =)

  • kinda cool watching these old sportscenters :)

  • did he cross the plain at 3:14???

  • Was Jason White drafted yet?

  • i mean if he was healthy and if they played on a neutral field

  • that would have gone to OU if they had their heisman QB

  • oh watever lsu would kill them anyways ou didnt even win the big 12 title. ksu pwned them!

  • Comment removed

  • dude they shouldnt have even played in the nc game!

  • how can you say they didnt deserve to be in there when they lost by 3 with their heisman QB injured?

  • they lost by a score of 35-7 in the big 12 title game.

  • so. your point is? they obviously deserved to be there because the game was so close.

  • dude ksu wasnt that good.

  • i agree. It should have been USC vs LSU. Oh well, it would've been a good match.

  • an element of the debate that you never heard anyone mention was that before any of the bowl games, we had won a higher percentage of games than USC because the Pac 10 refuses to have a conference championship...and yes, they should suffer for it. By the end of the season, we had won the highest percentage of games including the championship. I don't know how anyone can dispute that.

  • The debate is stupid...the AP championship is WORTHLESS. Before the season started every Div. 1A team knew what the rules and system were - the BCS Champion would be the ONLY national champion recognized by the NCAA. Call their office in Kansas City and ask them what on their books for football national champs for that year....only LSU's name is on the book. Case closed.

  • No way USC wins against LSU in the Superdome when they couldn't even beat Texas in the Rose Bowl which is a 15 min

    drive from USC's campus. People allways whined about LSU's advantage playing in the dome, but never mentioned USC's advantage playing Pasadena and losing to a sandlot type team.

  • thats exactly what I said.

  • @F5M04 i agree

  • @F5M04, even if they had allowed USC to play in the national championship game, LSU still would have won regardless.

  • GO LSU!!! damn i miss old espn

  • me too.

  • I mean, BarcaFan, LSU may have won a split national title and a national title with 2 losses, but i can't find the loopholes in that. This is ridiculous and i'm pretty sure people like to be dicks on youtube just because you don't have to talk to anyone's face or have anyone see you.

  • @cfbfanatic

    '' mean, BarcaFan, LSU may have won a split national title and a national title with 2 losses"

    Actually if you do research on why LSU in the 2007 Season went to the National Championship game against Ohio State with 2 losses, then you'll fully understand.

  • How do you people know LSU would have beaten USC? How do you know? You don't so all you LSU fans need to stop talking shit. The only thing we do know is the Tigers should have been playing the Trojans in the Sugar Bowl, not Oklahoma. So okay, USC lost to Stanford...in 2007. Not 2003. It would have been a great game to watch if these two played each other that year but fans of both schools really have their heads up their ass on here.

  • Lsu would have killed USC and everyone knows it. At least we lost to a decent team that year and we dont go and lose to teams that are ranked in the hundreds like stanford. Oregon state! lmao! Some powerhouse team. Come play a powerhouse SEC team and get a real challenge for once.

  • Comment removed

  • In 2003, LSU would slap and own USC like a pimp and his bitch. In 2007, We would of done it again but those trees from stanford did it for us. HA!!!!!!!!!!

  • Lee and Kirk are right, USC would have lost to LSU...except for one thing...not saying this as an LSU fan, but NO ONE was beating LSU that year, I don't care if LSU even played at the Coliseum. They lost to Florida because they were out of sync after a bye week, but once they got it together, they just kept everyone in check after that. No one scored over 20 points on these guys, USC would have been no different. Good job guys, GEAUX TIGERS!

  • Arkansas actually scored 24 in a losing effort.

  • yeah but LSU scored 55 so it didn't matter.

  • true, but I was just saying that a team did score 20+ on them that year.

  • @Tiger0477 Another LSWHO fan who is truly delusional! USC would still be kicking that LSWHO ass if they had played!

  • @greymoose1000 HAHAHAHA USC can't hold a candle to LSU SEC OWNS PAC-10 or 12 or whatever your shitty conference is!!!!!!!!

  • @SaintHakim504 LSWHO - Home to a qb who bashes in (KICKS with the assistance of a mob of fellow LSWHO players) head of a Marine; Home to Jimmy Swaggart, Frances, and Donny; Home to delusional CAJUNS; Home to the uneducated (In your area people say thank God for Tulane). Fight ON USC TROJANS!!! The Trojans were robbed of the BCS Title in 2003 - the Trojans would have beaten LSWHO by the end of the first quarter had they played; LSWHO given a bogus title in 2007 with two losses - PEEEEEEU!

  • @greymoose1000 LSU would beat USC's sorry ass then, now and in the future. Face it, USC is over, and will never recover.

  • @DOUCHEBAGSTOOKMYNAME USC was robbed of the title in 2003. They would have killed LSWHO!

  • @greymoose1000 USC, if anything, robbed LSU of the AP title. It was ludicrous that they were voted above them. I watched this game, I'm pretty sure the #2 team beating #1 is better than whatever than USC did.

    USC is DONE. D-O-N-E. They are the past, while LSU, and the rest of the SEC for that matter, is the future.

  • @DOUCHEBAGSTOOKMYNAME The Trojans would have torn off the CAJUN necks and shit down their trunks if they had played. On of the most dominating teams of all time was represented by the Trojans that year. LSWHO snuck in with a championship.

  • @greymoose1000 Keep dreaming. LSU's defense would've shot down USC in any attempt, just like we shut down OU back then. LSU got into the Championship on talent alone. USC had to buy their way to a co-host title. Your arguement will forever be invalid because of that fact, so spit out what you "Think". LSU was IN THE REAL CHAMPIONSHIP, they HOISTED THE COACHES' TROPHY at the end of the day. Therefore they are the national champions of college football. The AP was too busy riding USC's dick.

  • @DOUCHEBAGSTOOKMYNAME Delusions of GRANDEUR appear to be a common theme with SEC THUG followers such as yourself. Too bad reality escapes your little minds. SC is the greatest team and Matt Barkley is the leader for this year's Heisman.

  • @greymoose1000 What's making me delusional? The fact that LSU stomped the reigning PAC-10 champ? or the fact that LSU went out of SEC territory and kept a high-scoring offense out of the endzone? Or maybe it's because Bama went way out of SEC territory and smashed Penn State? or Bama's domination of Florida in their home field makes me delusional. You're right, I mean Arizona State was soooo much better all of those guys, so USC has a good excuse why they lost, righht?

  • @greymoose1000 OR maybe it's the 5 BCS championship this conference has won. Yeah you're right, what bowl was USC in last year? Oh wait, I forgot, they cheated and got caught, so they won't be in any bowl games. Carroll knew he was in deep shit, thats why he ran like a bitchBarkley is a joke, I can name three players off hand that deserve the heisman more, and they're not even SEC players: Andrew Luck, Denard Robinson, Baylor's QB. You put USC against LSU's defense, they'd look like Kentucky.

  • @DOUCHEBAGSTOOKMYNAME They'd be lucky to get a first down against them. Matt Barkley would lose his heisman status in a heartbeat, and Tyrann Mathieu would replace him after making him his bitch, hell I'd bank that LSU, UF, Bama, Auburn, Arkansas, South Carolina would all stomp USC, home, away and neutral, cause they blow.

  • @DOUCHEBAGSTOOKMYNAME The MEN OF TROY would make mince meat of LSWHO! How is Jimmy Swaggart these days?

  • @greymoose1000 I wouldn't be too fond of the Trojan mascot, being as the greeks came in and complete eradicated that country. You can compare the SEC as a whole to the Greeks, With Tyrann Matheiu being Achilles and LSU being his Myrmidons. We'd stomp USC, don't even play with me.

  • @DOUCHEBAGSTOOKMYNAME LSWHO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @greymoose1000 USC was robbed of the title alright, they robbed themselves and it caught up to them. Geaux Tigers

  • @greymoose1000 oh yeah LSWho huh? At least our coach didn't run out on us when the heat started coming down on us!

  • @DFrnkln06 LSWHO defeated a completely outmanned Gator team yesterday. UAT defeated an outmanned Vandy team. Therefore, the MOOSE of USC refuses to acknowledge either one as a top five team at this time. Standford is number one!

  • @greymoose1000 sooo let me guess, "LSWHO" also beat an outmanned Oregon, Mississippi State, and West Virginia team as well... don't worry I'll wait for that answer...

  • @greymoose1000 Of course those teams were outmanned, do you not think your USC Trojans outman most of their sub-standard west coast competition? I guess I don't think they do either

  • USC was the best and LSU was lucky to not play them and it would have been a rout.

  • haha you're a funny guy. face it, LSU=2003 national champs. There's no split championship.

  • Yeah there was chief. Before the BCS championship game USC was number one in the AP and the Coaches Poll. The only reason LSU was voted number one in the coaches poll was the winner had to be voted number one. I love how all you coonass inbred hicks are so insecure about that team. Deep down you know 'SC was the best team in the country and would have laid a beat down on that LSU team. I find it funny how to the worst BCS champs came from LSU.

  • no there wasn't , chief. The crystal ball is here in Baton Rouge if you'd like to come see it. It's funny you'd talk shit about LSU...let me remind you that your pathetic trojans lost to Stanford....STANFORD. And how bout that juggernaut Oregon State. So much for your "dynasty". Dynasties don't lose to teams like that...and dynasties win more than one championship. I count on your trojans to lose to another pussy PAC-10 team again this year. Later, surfer boy.

  • Hey coonass, I'm sorry that LSU will never be the program that USC is and that your only two recent "titles" are defined by mediocrity and loopholes. Talk to me when your team actually goes undefeated and wins a national championship and doesn't lose to unranked teams on the to way to your "national title." Also, I believe Jarrett Lee just threw another pick six, man that Chick-Fil-A bowl must have felt good this year, while we won "oh I think our third Rose Bowl in a row" I'm losing count.

  • how are our titles defined by loopholes? Last i checked, your team wasn't in the title game in 2003. And it wasn't in the title game in 2007 because your sorry ass trojans got beat by...wait who was it again...oh that's right...STANFORD. And I hope you don't think SEC fans envy your trojans for winning the pathetic Rose Bowl. I'd love to see a SEC powerhouse team get invited to it and then we'll see how many you win. HAHAHA...Stanford...I still can't get over that one!!!! Later, gay surfer boy

  • watch?v=MtoqK0iAflI

    ...need i say more?? hahaha...i still can't get over it...it's just too damn funny.

  • LSU Tigers were the true national champions that year. AP titles don't count in the BCS era. Sorry.

  • man...I remember the old SportsCenter, good times

  • even in 2003 espn is suckin usc dick

  • How was Oklahoma still #1 despite being destroyed by Kansas State in the Big 12 title game? Should have been LSU vs. USC.

  • screw usc, we would have killed them that year who did they lose to the almighty syracuse they dont play no one we would have beat them anywhere in the country i really wish they wouldve played so we could shut them up because they are the most overrated team every year. GEAUX TIGERS!!

  • USC actually lost to Cal in 2003.

  • Amen i would have paid to see us play usc!! we would of destroyed them anywhere our defense wass unbelievable that year..plus playmakers on offense!! GEAUX TIGERS!!!!!!!!

  • RIP Marquis Hill.

  • Fuck that nigga, nobody cares about that Cajun nigga.

  • Hey, you disown Nick Saban, you disown his championships too.

  • Not really.

  • I don't want to arguem about who was a more legitimate national champion in 2003, but one things for sure: LSU should ahve been playing USC in this game. Oklahoma never should have been in it. I don't care how dominate they looked throughout the season. Two words: Kansas State (or Darron Sproles, however you want to look at it)

  • Thats easy to say when your conference sucks so much. USC is the only good team in the pac 10. Besides, LSU is in the books as THE NC's so get over it

  • i am over it. Too bad they didnt play. Fuckin Bcs

  • I agree. The only reason the big 10 does not want a conference game is because they know they do not stand a chance and I dont know if you care about this or not but the rose bowl might not be against a Pac 10 or big 10 team

  • I think that the rose bowl should have been illinois and hawaii and the sugar bowl should have been georgia vs sc.

  • You sure don't sound over it. Maybe USC can be somebody this year. Nah, that's what I thought.

  • Idiot...play in a legit conference and play a championship game then you can run your mouth!

  • I'm surprised that Justin Vincent never emerged as an elite tailback for LSU. I don't know what the hell happened to him. He was better then Alley Broussard and Jospeh Addai.

  • USC blos, they had an incredibly easy schedule, their hardest opponent Notre dame, lost to syracuse that year by an embarrasing loss

  • you heard what Chad Lavalias said lol... " we wont put USC name on the ring.."

  • The 3 most overrated teams-Usc, Osu , and V Tech

    The 3 best teams- LSU , Georgia , and Oklahoma.

    LSUMichigan 4 life.

  • if OSU USC and V Tech are overrated and Georgia is won of the best, then why all 3 of them has won a BCS nat championship and UGA hasn't. UGA is good but think about what ur saying, o and didnt USC rape Oklahoma in the BCS. And OSU rapes UM every year

  • He didn't say that those teams were shit. He said they are OVERRATED. Which they are because they never play anybody

  • The 3 most overrated teams-Usc, Osu , and V Tech

    The 3 best teams- LSU , Georgia , and Oklahoma.

    LSUMichigan 4 life.

  • This should be a BCS bowl rule-- if there is a chance for a Split title, the two teams should play each other for the true BCS title...Call it 'BCS Extreme Overtime" and stop this AP BS thing...

  • mann dat dam man on the far left always hatin' lsu he hated dis year 2 when day whupt' ohio st. dat ole bitch ass man and u no day gone win it again dis year.

  • espn will do anything possible to take away our national championships from us. screw USC they suck

  • how does USC split this national championship?

  • OSU - One Sorry University

    I smell Buckeye fear.

    Geaux Tigers!!

  • "The other half of the national championship?" B.S.!

  • LSU was the national champion. NOT USC. The fact that they even considered a cochampionship is BULLSHIT. Every coach in the NCAA agreed to go by what the BCS would rank people as before that season even began. USC didn't get what they wanted, tough shit. LSU was #1 USC was #2. END OF STORY.

  • @i4ms3xi3r Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! Nothing is funnier than a LUSer self-deluding itself into thinking there was any LUS title. The coaches FREELY voted USC #1. The AP voted USC #1. The only thing the LUSers can claim to be #1 in is in being whining, bitching, fantaszing LUSers.

  • @63utuber what is it your doing right now to me sound like acting like a whining bitch

  • @63utuber so ur sayin u aint bitchin rite now hmmmmmm....r u fuckin retarded...yea thas wat the coaches nd the ap did but they dnt decide the national champion dickweed, the BCS does nd obviously LSU beat OU....so stop wit ur bitchin u stupid dumbass nd shut the fuck up

  • @i4ms3xi3r i get what you are saying but Oklahoma should of never even went to the championship because oklahoma got beat down by ksu in the big 12 championship so it should of been lsu vs usc in the championship

  • @PengyjangJr It's 2011, get over it.

  • @i4ms3xi3r and usc would beat lsu