And of course Obama would say "don't question the events on 9/11". It's all part of the plot to make people FEAR the government thinking they could cause 9/11. It's so OBVIOUS.
Please think for yourself and don't swallow the government LIES.
Your are right about the Al burning temperture. Yet, when it burns it's a bluish color. Thermite on the other hand burn bright orange. Plus, to burn the steel jet fuel is still lacking the tempurates. Nice try on debunking. Keep trying to and you will end up like the rest of us. WE KNOW IT WAS AN INSIDE JOB.
@flawlesscowboy8 It's been PROVEN the 9/11 Truth Movement is a CIA operation. The government failed to protect the people on 9/11 and now is LYING to say they caused it to help spread FEAR. FEAR is used to CONTROL. I don't understand why people can't think for themselves and just listen to everything the government tells them to think. FIGHT THE CIA LIES! QUESTION THE 9/11 TRUTH MOVEMENT!!
@pantspoopie No it's not a CIA movement. There's far too much evidence. Plus, the FBI and CIA both have tried to keep footage of the pentagon from getting out. Search hotel camera on 9 11. If the 9/11 truth movement was made by the government why did Obama say "Do not question the events on 9/11.". Trust me we are the minority we are not going by what they tell us, just the evidence.
@flawlesscowboy8 You're parroting the EXACT SAME talking points the CIA has propagandized. Do you even TRY to think for yourself? Think about these facts.
1. Every single 9/11 Truth Movement show, website, video, speaker and book LISTS THE EXACT SAME TALKING POINTS.
2. Such coordination across EVERY SINGLE MEDIUM AT THE SAME TIME suggests a massive effort.
3. Such a massive effort at propaganda is a classic CIA operation.
This is CRAP... Bring your charts and graphs and use "if" and "probably" alot. This moron is talking about columns like they are all on the outside of the building. I'm talking about 47 steel columns at the core and unexploded residue of explosives found in the dust. White dust coming off of severed joints and connections as they fly from the buildings. The E4B's flying in the background on video at both sites. One at the Pentagon and poss. 2 at WTC. One clearing out Wash DC and was on CNN.
What about the THERMATE found in the dust???? Sure we can argue about sparks ALL day.....the facts are in the dust. It's PHYISICS! Like 2+2=4 and nothing else. The SAME principle applies to physics.
People can come up with conspiracy theories for anything. Look at Titanic:
How could a ship deemed unsinkable sink in three hours with minor damage? On its first voyage? How could it break in half like that? Why did people report hearing explosions before it sank? How convenient is it that the designer had removed the extra lifeboats in such a short time! And for what? Because they looked bulky? Suuure...Was it a conspiracy by the government to cover up the tensions leading to WWI?
Nano thermite paint. Otherwise known as red oxide primer and Aluminium paint, exactly the same as is painted all over the Brooklyn bridge, Forth rail bridge...
Wait a minute......What about the multiple Scientists that have found evidence in multiple samples of nano-thermite in WTC dust. Explain that MrPat !!! Your country needs war to exist....come to Canada my friend, we forgive your ignorance.
why do you sheeple doubt that govt is corrupt, that men are corrupt? do you think those with money and power will not take advantage of their position and your ignorance to pass laws which allow them to monitor your every move. why is it so hard to believe that they can actually be responsible for this atrocity. absolute power corrupts absolutely...that is no conspiracy theory!
Looking at what is pouring out of the building is only part of the evidence. There is video evidence of orange glowing steel & the cleanup crew & firefighters have stated that there was glowing orange molten metal still at the scene weeks after the collapse. There is no possible way that contamination from office furniture, supplies, etc. is going to make molten aluminum look exactly like molten steel. But you go right ahead and keep telling yourself that safe, comfortable lie.
This is indeed BS, Molten aluminum is not red coloured but silver coloured when it is molten. What you see is steel treated met a special paint with nano thermite what is easily to mix. When it then comes in contact with fire it burnes through steel beames what you clearly can see at some videos and pictures after the collapse of the buildings
Video is indeed BS, but the author is not ready to handle the truth. CSI meets 9/11 and yeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!! Nano-Thermite is found in everything. You can't explain away that
6 weeks later huge pools of molton metal and concrete that can be seen from space but hey this was part of the plane wtf you debunkers fail. every plane crash that burst into flames show me this same picture please you stupid assholes
These were small nuclear devices that went off inside the building. That is why all the search dogs have died along with all the people working at ground zero they all have died from radiation poisoning. Diesel fuel will not cause radiation poisoning nor will diesel fuel burn for 3 months straight.
@rdbob61 Just when I thought I'd heard every nutty theory about 9/11 mankind could conceive, you mention small nuclear devices. There are no documented cases of rescue workers dieing from radiation poisoning! Lung cancer and asthma yes, but not radiation poisoning. All the flammeble walls, cubicles, electronics, etc COULD burn for a long time. Imagine the pile of the wreckage of 100-something floors.. it would be burning but wouldnt burn instantly b/c of lack of oxygen.. hence the 3 months
@residentevilfan374 - Actually, the lunatic fringe claimed the towers were taken down by nuclear bombs in the first few months after 9/11. With the lack of radiation, they transformed that into "special" nuclear bombs that magically didn't emit radiation. Later these guys were either labelled as embarrassments to their own side and marginalised, or labelled as disinfo agents by their own associates.
Wow Wonder what caused 5,000 human corpses to explode, vaporize in 12 seconds. In a collapse there would be floors left and people that looked like a grease spot not blown to bits by FIRE. It takes the human body in a controlled chamber 1800 degrees 2500 degrees to cremate from 1 1/2 to 4hours. Yet 911 Planes diesel fuel fire pulverized, vaporized bodies till 2,000 remain unidentified, unidentified by a fire. A fire who you trying to misinform??
So now, everyone with a brain, who has a bit of knowledge of the basic laws of physics, and speaks out, is a conspiracy theorist? Either you are very stupid, or you are getting paid to suck satan's cock and misinform the public.
What a bunch of bullshit. It was said in the video that steel bends and melts at 2700 degrees F and the fires got up for maybe 1800 degrees. So how did the buildings fall? It HAD to be an inside job plain and simple.
@getalife04 no, it says that steel melts at 2750. Obviously it weakens (bends) at a much lower temperature. How could it both bend and melt at the same temperature? You either didn't pay attention or you're an idiot, plain and simple.
@getalife04 How would being an inside job magically make 1800 degrees able to melt the steel in the towers when 1800 degrees under the mainstream story wouldn't? You agreed that the fires WERE burning at 1800 but still fell... so are you gonna say that ninjas sneaked into the twin towers at night and planted explosives? Please, save yourself from further embarrassment.
@residentevilfan374 You clearly don't know anything about how thermite explosives work. The point I was trying to make is that the fire didn't get hot enough to melt steel yet it DID. Jet fuel just doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel. If they used thermite explosive which are commonly used in demolition, fireworks etc. 6 weeks after the towers fell there was STILL molten steel buried under the rubble. Explain how that is possible with just jet fuel?
@flouride666 Not "probably", or "likely", or in your own words again, "cannot accurately be compared". Facts. All of them. And oh yes, let's not forget you haven't addressed WTC 7 at all. You know, the one that just imploded for the hell of it, because it had a bad day. Seriously, it's not even worth debating with you any longer, since you believe that "unprecedented collapses make perfect sense". You have lost your ability to think for yourself and with an open mind. Don't ignore the facts!!!
@flouride666 "Unprecedented collapses make perfect sense?" That statement in itself speaks volumes about how completely brainwashed you are. You blindly believe everything the government says as truth and ignore the obvious facts. No steel structure building has ever collapsed from a plane crash. No steel structure building has ever collapsed from a fire. Larry Silverstein wanted to, and intended to destroy the buildings, and turned a 124million investment into 7billion . These are facts.
@flouride666 Another good one is the 2002 Pirelli Tower crash. And yes, that remained standing as well. Open you eyes to reality. What took place on 9/11 was simply not possible by the reasons the government suggests. It is so incredibly obvious it's not funny.
@bartman5347 so your answer to "how many instances before 9/11 were there of a passenger jet hitting a skyscraper?" is zero. Glad I could clear that up for you.
I would add that the crashes on 9/11 cannot accurately be compared to most other plane crashes, since they were intentionally crashed going as fast as possible. Normally pilots are resisting the crash.
But it isn't really necessary to even go there, since you admit there is no precedent. So unprecedented collapses make perfect sense
@flouride666 There are MANY instances of planes crashing into buildings. But here's probably the best example: The B-25 bomber that crashed into the upper floors of the Empire State Building. Guess what? It didn't collapse. The towers were built much later to much stricter building codes. Coincidence? Well, you already know the answer to that, whether you want to admit or not.
So to think that damage on the upper floors only of these buildings could cause entire collapses of both is preposterous. Not to mention, again, that nothing ever hit WTC 7, yet it imploded as well, supposedly from fires. The surrounding buildings closer to the towers had MUCH more damage than 7, yet they still remained standing. Why 7? No surprise here either. That is where the CIA, FBI, NIST, and several other agencies stored top secret records. Another coincidence? I think not.
@bartman5347 "So to think that damage on the upper floors only of these buildings could cause entire collapses of both is preposterous. " no, not at all. Detailed reports by qualified experts have explained exactly why this happened.
There are far too many eyewitness accounts of people exiting the towers who have stated the lobbies of the buildings were completely demolished when they left, and also heard several explosions. The lobby didn't have a plane crash into it. Here is something interesting to watch and think about. Check out some posts of "failed implosions", or "failed building demolition". Some of these buildings remain standing, even after having the entire base of the structure blown out.
@flouride666 He then went on to have them specifically insured against terrorist attacks in the amount of 7 billion dollars. Coincidence? I think not.
@bartman5347 the WTC had already been attacked by terrorists in the 90's. He'd have to be an idiot not to buy insurance. And of course, this is thus the opposite of coincidence.
@flouride666 You are correct about one aspect about that. It was impossible to implode the towers without causing collateral damage to the other buildings. Which is one of the reasons that Larry Silverstein was turned down when he applied for a permit to have a controlled demo done. The other reason was asbestos. He was informed by the Port Authority that the buildings would have to be disassembled floor by floor at a cost of 15 billion. He had only recently purchased the buildings.
Wow! That is the most ridiculous post I have seen yet about the towers implosion. The towers were shut down numerous times previous to the events of 9/11, therefore giving more than ample opportunity to place all of the necessary charges. Wake up people!!! Two 150 floor buildings do not just collapse perfectly, and then continue to burn at over 1500 degrees for over 6 months, if it was merely plane crashes that caused the collapse of both. And yes Equus1965 is correct. NOTHING hit wtc 7.
@bartman5347 collapsed "perfectly" according to who? it may shock you to learn that a controlled demolition typically isn't designed to obliterate nearby buildings.
And this "debunks" what? The collapse of three steel structured buildings because of fire (one would have been a major event as it has never happened before or since) all in one day and in the same city and the same complex. Yeah right. Wonders will never cease. WTC 7 had a minor fire by comparison and wasn't even hit by a plane yet it still collapsed in it's own footprint
@flouride666 What difference does it make? Firstly the towers were built to withstand the impact of a 707 (4 engined commercial airliner). Secondly, as previously stated, WTC 7 wasn't hit by an aircraft. The official reason given was that fire was the main factor in all three buildings. No steel structured building has ever collapsed because of fire prior to 9/11.
@Equus1965 you are incorrect. The NIST assertions are: "The WTC towers collapsed because: (1) the impact of the planes severed and damaged support columns, dislodged fireproofing insulation coating the steel floor trusses and steel columns, and widely dispersed jet fuel over multiple floors and (2) the... unusually large multi-floor fires significantly weakened the floors and columns...to the point where floors sagged and pulled inward on the perimeter columns."
@Equus1965 "...This led to the inward bowing of the perimeter columns and failure of the south face of WTC 1 and the east face of WTC 2, initiating the collapse of each of the towers. "
as for the 707:
"The 707 that was considered in the design of the towers was estimated to have a weight of 263,000 lbs and speed of 180 mph; the Boeing 767-200ER aircraft that were used to attack the towers had an estimated gross weight of 274,000 pounds and flight speeds of 470 to 590 mph upon impact. "
@flouride666 The cruising speed of a 707 was 575mph. I understand that the general populace will believe the "Official" story of 9/11 but there is too much that the commission seems to have elected to overlook. The remains of the Towers were spirited away to be re-cycled in China when ordinarily everything would have been gone over with a fine tooth comb. Three buildings collapse in the same complex in the same city and on the same day.
@Equus1965 the building was designed to withstand a 707 going 180 mph, one that was on its way to land at an airport and not crashed intentionally. This information is not hidden, anyone can look it up. The commission did not overlook it, you did.
@flouride666 I didn't say that the commission overlooked this fact, specifically and so I have overlooked nothing. On the other hand you didn't feel the need to answer back with regard to the fact that the remains of the buildings were removed for disposal before any analysis could be carried out. That is a crime in itself
@Equus1965 again you are wrong. the steel was inspected, for over two years. the inspection process is exhaustively detailed in the NIST report titled "NIST NCSTAR - 1-3", available for anyone to read online anytime they want. Have you read it?
@Equus1965 right. well, when people describe you as a lunatic conspiracy theorist, this is what they're referring to. In the face of overwhelming evidence you simply decide that the evidence is "fabricated", despite having no evidence to support this assertion. You don't like the truth, so you decide it isn't the truth. What a total coward.
@flouride666 Ha ha ha my word. Do you think that you're going to make me fall into line just because YOU call me a coward. Don't make me laugh you ridiculous excuse for a human being. I stand up for what I believe in and I won't back down regardless of the odds. Get real for goodness sake. Open your eyes and start to question what they're telling you. Be a man for once in your life and stand up for what is right. The pursuit of truth is not cowardly. Have the last word little man, be my guest
nice vid u sure debunked it and funny how every animated 911 is off its pretty hard to replicate false evidence as truth cause it doesnt fall in place and it lacks god work~!
@punapeter Nano Thermite paint? do you have any idea what your talking about? please dont quote the descredited crap from Mr Jones and co. Tell me how you will detonate nano thermite paint, bear in mind that thermite is notoriously difficult to detonate, so unreliable it is not used in CD. By the way do you mean nano thermate? Truthers started this same accusation years ago first thermite, proved not possible so it then became thermate, again not poss, so now its nano thermite / ate
@K9explo459 HA your an ignorant person living in a world where you believe you have covered all possibilities...The Army was using thermite grenades in WW2. They were used to melt through steel targets such as artillery batteries and hard metal equipment. So your argument about thermite being too hard to detonate is baseless and embarrassing to yourself. In fact the technology you speak of has been perfected for over half a century you dumb, arrogant, cowardly fuck!!! dont try to act smart
@AntBanks2626 You really have no idea what you are talking about, keep your insults to yourself. If you dont have the intelligence to refrain from obscene language I dont have any intention of conversing with you.
@K9explo459 haha thats all you can say!!! You have nothing to say because you keep thinking that thermite grenades didnt exist when in fact they have been used by our own military for almost a century. Your the idiot on You Tube telling people they dont know what they are talking about when you dont know shit! So my advice to you is Shut the Fuck up! Go learn something about the material before you speak out loud. I know what im talking about its clear that you dont and I think its funny!
@AntBanks2626 I am fully aware that themite was used in grenades to destroy primarily ammunition during the last war, what the hell has that got to do with 'thermite paint? I assume you know the difference in the explosive capabilities? I have been involved using explosives within the military for 20 years, you still have no idea what you are talking about, just a big and foul mouth and no intelligence. Go away little boy. Bye bye
@AntBanks2626 I think everyone is getting the "thermite" wrong. It was invented for smelting origanally. The explosive version came later with introducing more chemicals. The reaction rate can be also tuned with particle sizes; coarser particles burn slower than finer particles. The effect is more pronounced with the particles requiring being heated to higher temperature to start reacting. This effect is pushed to the extreme with nano-thermites, thermates burn with evolution of flame and gases.
@FutureLaugh Well, there were four planes, and four buildings were either hit or destroyed. The reason there is no debris from a plane in Shanksville is that was the location of a secret terrorist space/time wormhole that transported that plane into WTC 7 to bring it down. Four planes, four buildings. That tallies. And if one cruise missile/plane malfunctions you still gotta blow the charges in WTC 7 as planned.
Respond to this video... I used to pour aluminium at a foundry. The AL we used to heat to cherry red before pouring, to be sure it was fluid enough to fill the mold before freezing. It took about 40 minutes in a forced air BLAST FURNACE to get it hot enough. When we poured it turned silvery the instant is splashed against anything. The metal in your vid is steel, the way it sparks as it splashes, the way it keeps glowing through the cool air as it burns in oxygen. Clearly steel.
Oh, yes, and when I weld aluminium and its sparks fly through the air, they burn a brilliant white color, not the yellow of steel being welded or cut by a torch or plasma cutter. Aluminium is used for white stars in fireworks (magnesium is too unreliable). So if your AL droplets are hot enough to glow enough to be seen in daylight, they would burn bright white. Yellow is just impossible for AL. Bright yellow spatter with forking sparks is steel for anyone who has ever worked with the stuff.
@cryosun no doubt you are right about what happens in a foundry to pure aluminium under controlled conditions. You are ignoring the fact that whatever came out of the buildings would have been contaminated by a myriad of different things.
@NY10909 well then holy shit could you imagine his face when 3 buildings fell instead? probably looked sort of like Larry Silverstien when he got that insurance plan- specifically in case terrorists crash planes into the towers?
@FutureLaugh hah, no doubt, wtc 7 was just the cherry to top it all off. And i saw how Silverstien increased his insurance specifically in terrorism just prior to 9/11.. funny how blatantly obvious it all is... but the media and government just slaps the word terror on anything and the sheep eat it up.
@NY10909 google silverstien "on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building" It was a fox news hit piece against jesse ventura and they admitted that piece of information... only incriminating him more!
@FutureLaugh i havent heard about the on the phone thing, but i did see a interview of silverstein where he admits he gave the go ahead to "pull it" which in demolition terms means to bring down a building.. What i cant figure out is why the sprinkler systems in the building we're unable to contain fires cause by nothing more than falling debris.
@NY10909 I dont understand how the insurance company can fork over all that money when they werent allowed to investigate themselves? You dont hand over 500 million to a guy who was asking you if he can blow the building up- and then turn around and say "oh never mind, it just fell over anyway- you know all those fires and all"
I don't know where you got that chart, but poured molten aluminum absolutely does look completely silver at 1800º f. I have seen it myself. Your video is BS.
@AntiAlGore001 You are assuming it is not mixed with other materials. Aluminum in a controlled environment like a foundry would be a silvery color, but this is not a controlled environment. It would have mixed with other metal objects that may have melted and would also likely have other debris mixed in with it. This would have altered the color. Ever seen an aluminum can melt? I have. The can melts and stays silvery but the color coating on the outside glows red as it burns away.
@AntiAlGore001 drjudywood com/articles/aluminum/Aluminum_Glows. that is where the chart is and an article. u tube wouldnt let me post the full address for some reason hopefully there is enough of it left for you to find the article
@AntiAlGore001 Yes, this is not a color chart for aluminum but perhaps for steel. I wish I could eliminate the idea of the metal having been lead or copper. One of the impacted floors comprised batteries for an electrical back up power supply for the tenant above, so many that the floor had to be strengthened for the tenant's purpose. These would have produced a lot of lead (the plates) and copper (the connecting harnesses).
Except ur forgetting they found thermite residue in the debris and 5 ft thick steel beams bent into u shaped pieces without cracking or breaking at all u moron. That takes alot of heat!! Explosions before the planes even hit also.
It's thermite, and it was not set off prematurly, it was doing exactly as was intended . And NO the floors above did not crush floors below as seen here the building is destroyed from the top down with NOTHING above the point of destruction youtube.com/watch?v=EgN080yySe0
Thank you for your reply, but the fires weren't hot enough - and the impact, whilst it may have weakened key steel girders could never account for this being one the three only EVER buildings achieving free fall speed collapses without assistance! Thermite was used look at some of the standing ground based girders and the angle and perfectness of the theirs slicing -perfect to create sheer and the drop at the base to guarantee to perfect 100% free fall collapse. Sorry but your are so so wrong.
It's true to say Aluminium burns at a much lower temperature (ref: the Falklands war and UK warships made of Aluminium (never again I hope)) But it's sort of irrelevant you are using this to prove a point which states these three buildings (inc Building 7) were taken down by Aluminium fires - just impossible. Poor research and poor argument. Sorry for you. Shame
@dazzer01 The aluminum fires account for the red molten liquid coming out of the windows and eliminate the possibility of thermite.... what actually took down the buildings was having some support columns that were completely wiped out by the plane's impact and the rest being weakened by the fires.
@Reymius "Max temperature for flame from jet fuel, 1800 degrees." - The jet fuel was only the ignition source and was not responsible for the high temperatures.... Building fires however can reach 1000C...
Wow - totally debunked. I'm now a believer that muslims did it. And that the govt didn't, had nothing to gain, and always is looking out for the publics best interest.
THERE IS PLENTY OF PROOF IT WAS MOLTEN IRON... JUST GO TO THE POLICE MUSEUM AND SEE FOR YOURSELF... ANYTIME THERE IS MOLTEN IRON AND CONCRETE INFUSED TOGETHER NATIONAL STANDARD IS TO TEST FOR EXPLOSIVES.. WHY DID THEY NOT TEST THEN!!!
first off molten iron appears bright yellow... ur wrong cause if thermite can cut through steel like it wasn't there, it could easily heat up to 4500 degrees within 45 seconds causing the steel rods in the center of the building to just horseshoe and collapse and melt for a minute or so before cooling down, this also explains the molten pile of metal under the debris 6 weeks after the buildings fell. This would also explain why it fell soon after this video. Soooo... your wrong patna ;)
@yumsforlife "thermite can cut through steel like it wasn't there," - Yet no suspiciously cut columns were found by anyone...
"and melt for a minute or so before cooling down" - You claim it would burn quickly and then cool... and at the same time you claim it will remain hot for 6 weeks? You're contradicting yourself.
Thermate, thermite, superdooperthermite is a terrible explanation for molten metal weeks later as they burn quickly and very brightly... it would be so obvious.
@markh1011 ok first off if u watch the smithsonian video of 9/11 u can see (if u look very closely) columns that are just cut in half, second when i said cool down i ment a couple hundread degrees, thermite is used for quick cutting through large columns, but in this situation it couldve been a simple,easy,quick and shady terrorist attack, oh wait it was,
@yumsforlife "columns that are just cut in half," - Where? What video and what time.
"thermite is used for quick cutting through large columns," - Not one person found any suspiciously cut columns. Not one. Thousands were involved in the clean up, including demo experts and engineers. Nothing. It would be so obvious that the very idea of it is ridiculous.
@markh1011----------and thirdly there was too much smoke coming out of the building, too much sunlight beaming down, and too small of windows for you to have seen it burning in the outmost central parts of building so don't come at me because i expect you to understand things that go without saying :I
@yumsforlife "nd thirdly there was too much smoke coming out of the building" - Too much smoke? What did you base this on?
"too much sunlight beaming down," - ?
"and too small of windows for you to have seen it burning in the outmost central parts of building so don't come at me because i expect you to understand things that go without saying :I" - Go without saying? Sorry but I don't understand what your point is here at all. Please re-phrase.
Respond to this video... oh yeah and even though thermite is used to weld things like -columns and railroad pieces and stuff like that, this case is different, for one there is alot of pressure and weight on each individual column, two there was 2 FULL tanks of jet fuel burning at the same time that the columns were being cut by thermite(or could have been) there for weakening the entire structure at least 65% causing a shift in weight to the giant hole that in the building.
@markh1011 this casued a the callapse because the twin towers were meant to be able to withstand these types of disasters. THAT is the best explination i have and if you see any holes in my theory tell me and ill fill it
@yumsforlife "this casued a the callapse because the twin towers were meant to be able to withstand these types of disasters" - One of the designers has said that they considered the collision of a 707 flying slowly potentially lost in fog.. and that they didn't consider the jet fuel.
@yumsforlife your entire presumption is a hole. the towers were not built to withstand what happened to them. so it is not surprising at all that they collapsed
this still doesn't explain why they found molten steel in the wreckage after the collapse of all 3 buildings. Experts have all said that the fires didn't burn hot enough to create the molten steel. whats dripping out of the building may well be aluminum but it still doesn't explain the molten steel in the rubble. Not to mention the fact that multiple independent experts did tests on the dust and debris from the towers and found Thermite evident.
@experts also said that wall street couldnt collapse, dont believe everything you here alot of these "experts" use fake evidence to further their cause
@sgelinas87 "Experts have all said that the fires didn't burn hot enough to create the molten steel" - No one ever confirmed it was actually steel that was molten. There were other metals there with a much lower melting point that look the same...
"Not to mention the fact that multiple independent experts did tests" - Actually no. When experts like USGS and the R J Lee group did tests they didn't find anything suspicious.... only the kook scientists claim they did.
@sgelinas87 "experts did tests on the dust and debris from the towers and found Thermite evident" .. and the report from Jones and Harrit actually confirmed that it WASN'T thermite.
No mention how the office fires in bldg. 7 . even though there was no aluminum from planes to drip molton lava , came down (in it's own footprint) and the "patriot" who stands by the official version of this event , proves that patriotism can cause blindness to truth and can provide a lasting hiding place for a fool who needs a safe place to stroke himself !
well all i seem to be hearing for nearly the last 10 years is molten steel here molten metal there. but i havent heard but just a few rationally thinking people say did the steel in the towers need to be in "molten" stage to collaspes ? yes would be the answer. NOW wouldnt steel heated to the degree of merely "softening" cause a collapse ? i would think that also would be a BIG FUCKING YES ! and i have no doubts that between the impact damage and "softening" did those towers in
some of the neocon warmongers and the 9/11 inside job theory does not work with their warmongering ways...so they discount the facts and continue believing that the enemy is exactly as the televisions says it is. The warmongering neocons want their enemies lined up like ducks in a row...they cannot manage anything else...
The only thing debunked here is that the makers of the video are telling the truth. NO! This is all lies and cover-up. Aluminum, which I've melted and cast personally is silver when melted. It does not glow at all. INVESTIGATE. ACT.
And I'm sure we were actually attacked at the gulf of Tonkins, and Iraq did have WMD. The government would never cover up any kind of foul play. Damn conspiracy theorist need to go back to there corner with there tin foil caps! HaHaHa!!!
Too many blind patriots! You need to wake up and listent to the experts, not the govt paid guys. I can't believe how blind some people can be.
The outer columns were obviously NOT the supporting steel beams. Aluminum does NOT burn & melt like that, you know nothing about metal works, period. And, you avoided the sure evidence of smaller explosions that occurred in consecutive-fashion from below the plane's impact zone which OBVIOUSLY led to the collapse of the building. You know nothing about structures & architectures.
BAD science dude! You CANNOT melt FORGED sheet aluminium with kerosene! PLUS the fires are burning BLACK, which shows they were starved for oxygen! no wear near optimal tempuerature to melt anything more than plastic and the hopes of ignorant people! EXPLORE the money trail of 9/11. THERE you will debunk yourself!
Conspiracy theorists wouldnt even know the meaning of thermite but they use it 2 prove 2 themselves theyre somekind of scientific geniuses when in reality theyre just numbnuts! haha They probably heard it somewhere so they thought yep that will do we run with that!! LOL
@westnblu that's what 'wanna be debunkers' always do ;) they think they can debunk everything, by employing fallacious reasoning or ignoring data that contradicts their priori worldview.
The floors supported their own weight as well as live loads, providing lateral stability to the exterior walls and distributing wind loads among the exterior walls.[33] The floors consisted of 4 inches (10 cm) thick lightweight concrete slabs laid on a fluted steel deck. A grid of lightweight bridging trusses and main trusses supported the floors.[34] The trusses connected to the perimeter at alternate columns and were on 6 foot 8 inch (2.03 m) centers.
The core of the towers housed the elevator and utility shafts, restrooms, three stairwells, and other support spaces. The core –a combined steel and concrete structure of each tower was a rectangular area 87 by 135 feet (27 by 41 m) and contained 47 steel columns running from the bedrock to the top of the tower. The large, column-free space between the perimeter and core was bridged by prefabricated floor trusses
The only problem with this (same as all the 'debunking' videos I have seen) is that it debunks nothing but merely offers an alternative view, which is fine, but it doesn't stand up to scrutiny. It doesn't answer the near free fall, it doesn't answer Building 7, it doesn't answer the plethora of witnesses who saw molten steel months after the even (despite being under water), it doesn't answer the lies and distortions in the Commission, the foreknowledge, the stand downs. It just gives opinion.
@md1807 simple fact can demolish all conspiracy theories , 9/11 was alqaeda (call it CIA if you want...), 11M madrid's train bombing , also organized by alqaeda ,wich kicked out the conservative side off the power , because of confusion and misinformation. OBM made communicates reivindicating both . If this was an inside job , why would bush , organize another attack in spain , wich would led Aznar (Bush's ally)lose his power (on the elections), and lose an ally in iraq? and then repeat it in UK
What fucking horseshit lies. MAYBE, Probably, possibly,likely,ALL FUCKING MAYBE'S & CONJECTURE WITH ABSOLUTELY NO FACTS. SOUNDS LIKE
RKOASSHOLE has been here,ALL his videos are sheer lies,guesses,conjecture & STUPIDITY & OH YEAH conspiracy theory. LOL FUCKING LOSER-just like the douche that repasted this horseshit.
@TheDeparted112570 YOUR THE IDIOT ! OVER 1000 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS AND PHYSICIST'S SAID TWIN TOWERS COULDNT HAVE ! pLUS THE 3RD BUILDING HAD AN OFFICE FIRE AND CAM DOWN THE SAME EXACT WAY LOL ! WAKE UP . NOT TO MENTION THERES NO PLANE PIECES AT EITHER OF OTHER 2 SITES ! DO SOME RESEARCH ON YOUR OWN ! IF YOUR NOT AN IDIOT YOU WILL SEE THERE IS NO WAY ANYTHING ON THAT DAY MAKES SENSE !
Evidence there was thermite in the wtc > Your evidence
nascar51523fan 1 week ago
And of course Obama would say "don't question the events on 9/11". It's all part of the plot to make people FEAR the government thinking they could cause 9/11. It's so OBVIOUS.
Please think for yourself and don't swallow the government LIES.
pantspoopie 2 weeks ago
Your are right about the Al burning temperture. Yet, when it burns it's a bluish color. Thermite on the other hand burn bright orange. Plus, to burn the steel jet fuel is still lacking the tempurates. Nice try on debunking. Keep trying to and you will end up like the rest of us. WE KNOW IT WAS AN INSIDE JOB.
flawlesscowboy8 2 weeks ago
@flawlesscowboy8 It's been PROVEN the 9/11 Truth Movement is a CIA operation. The government failed to protect the people on 9/11 and now is LYING to say they caused it to help spread FEAR. FEAR is used to CONTROL. I don't understand why people can't think for themselves and just listen to everything the government tells them to think. FIGHT THE CIA LIES! QUESTION THE 9/11 TRUTH MOVEMENT!!
pantspoopie 2 weeks ago
@pantspoopie No it's not a CIA movement. There's far too much evidence. Plus, the FBI and CIA both have tried to keep footage of the pentagon from getting out. Search hotel camera on 9 11. If the 9/11 truth movement was made by the government why did Obama say "Do not question the events on 9/11.". Trust me we are the minority we are not going by what they tell us, just the evidence.
flawlesscowboy8 2 weeks ago
@flawlesscowboy8 You're parroting the EXACT SAME talking points the CIA has propagandized. Do you even TRY to think for yourself? Think about these facts.
1. Every single 9/11 Truth Movement show, website, video, speaker and book LISTS THE EXACT SAME TALKING POINTS.
2. Such coordination across EVERY SINGLE MEDIUM AT THE SAME TIME suggests a massive effort.
3. Such a massive effort at propaganda is a classic CIA operation.
PROOF 9/11 Truth = CIA operation.
pantspoopie 2 weeks ago
how bout the fact the stuff was still burning a week latter
CommanderThsh 3 weeks ago
This is CRAP... Bring your charts and graphs and use "if" and "probably" alot. This moron is talking about columns like they are all on the outside of the building. I'm talking about 47 steel columns at the core and unexploded residue of explosives found in the dust. White dust coming off of severed joints and connections as they fly from the buildings. The E4B's flying in the background on video at both sites. One at the Pentagon and poss. 2 at WTC. One clearing out Wash DC and was on CNN.
Fred420ist 4 weeks ago
What about the THERMATE found in the dust???? Sure we can argue about sparks ALL day.....the facts are in the dust. It's PHYISICS! Like 2+2=4 and nothing else. The SAME principle applies to physics.
sourkushing 1 month ago
um... bullshit.
BetePete 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
People can come up with conspiracy theories for anything. Look at Titanic:
How could a ship deemed unsinkable sink in three hours with minor damage? On its first voyage? How could it break in half like that? Why did people report hearing explosions before it sank? How convenient is it that the designer had removed the extra lifeboats in such a short time! And for what? Because they looked bulky? Suuure...Was it a conspiracy by the government to cover up the tensions leading to WWI?
MazJax 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monkeys are smarter than Truthers.
12weasel100 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Debunking RKOwens4's videos "Zero Hallmarks of a Controlled Demolition" NEW
/watch?v=POaJT-82szE&lc=dJJocUdXradFpE4ph_FnDBe7Zi5oQr3L-prS3aw5-aA&feature=inbox
superlativeOFgood 2 months ago
Nano thermite paint. Otherwise known as red oxide primer and Aluminium paint, exactly the same as is painted all over the Brooklyn bridge, Forth rail bridge...
SvenTviking 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jonathan Cole, an engineer, make his own thermite & devices to prove it can cut through steel. Watch this video. /watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g
And his channel /user/physicsandreason
Also if thermite cannot cut steel & concrete columns, why have device been patented to do just that?
Patent No 5532449 - Murakami July 2nd '96
Thermite charges can be used "with high efficiency, while preventing a secondary problem due to noise, flying dust & chips, & the like"
FamousNoName 2 months ago
The problem of these remarkable scientists it that none of them know the meaning of GROUND ZERO.... Dimitri Khalezov explains 911...
Massaricossudo 2 months ago
You have DEBUNKED the thermite myth---CONGRATS
Wait a minute......What about the multiple Scientists that have found evidence in multiple samples of nano-thermite in WTC dust. Explain that MrPat !!! Your country needs war to exist....come to Canada my friend, we forgive your ignorance.
chunkypoms69 3 months ago 2
@chunkypoms69 no we will not. we stand on guard (or used to..at least)
TEMUJINARTS 4 weeks ago
why do you sheeple doubt that govt is corrupt, that men are corrupt? do you think those with money and power will not take advantage of their position and your ignorance to pass laws which allow them to monitor your every move. why is it so hard to believe that they can actually be responsible for this atrocity. absolute power corrupts absolutely...that is no conspiracy theory!
gregsees 3 months ago
Great! now a whole plane is piling into a small corner!!!
And then meltting!
LOL
And you base a whole video around it and find not the tiniest flaw in it?
You really are fucked up.
zenoist2 3 months ago
Looking at what is pouring out of the building is only part of the evidence. There is video evidence of orange glowing steel & the cleanup crew & firefighters have stated that there was glowing orange molten metal still at the scene weeks after the collapse. There is no possible way that contamination from office furniture, supplies, etc. is going to make molten aluminum look exactly like molten steel. But you go right ahead and keep telling yourself that safe, comfortable lie.
AntiAlGore001 3 months ago
Ground Zero = Place of pancake collapse... LMAO..
Massaricossudo 3 months ago
oh and alluminum doesnt burn yellow -.-
yumsforlife 4 months ago
Stupid video! Your patriotic crap is horrendous!
tahir630247365 4 months ago
This is indeed BS, Molten aluminum is not red coloured but silver coloured when it is molten. What you see is steel treated met a special paint with nano thermite what is easily to mix. When it then comes in contact with fire it burnes through steel beames what you clearly can see at some videos and pictures after the collapse of the buildings
nofosa 4 months ago
Video is indeed BS, but the author is not ready to handle the truth. CSI meets 9/11 and yeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!! Nano-Thermite is found in everything. You can't explain away that
auralierose 4 months ago
6 weeks later huge pools of molton metal and concrete that can be seen from space but hey this was part of the plane wtf you debunkers fail. every plane crash that burst into flames show me this same picture please you stupid assholes
commando7144 4 months ago
These were small nuclear devices that went off inside the building. That is why all the search dogs have died along with all the people working at ground zero they all have died from radiation poisoning. Diesel fuel will not cause radiation poisoning nor will diesel fuel burn for 3 months straight.
rdbob61 4 months ago
@rdbob61 Just when I thought I'd heard every nutty theory about 9/11 mankind could conceive, you mention small nuclear devices. There are no documented cases of rescue workers dieing from radiation poisoning! Lung cancer and asthma yes, but not radiation poisoning. All the flammeble walls, cubicles, electronics, etc COULD burn for a long time. Imagine the pile of the wreckage of 100-something floors.. it would be burning but wouldnt burn instantly b/c of lack of oxygen.. hence the 3 months
residentevilfan374 4 months ago
@residentevilfan374 - Actually, the lunatic fringe claimed the towers were taken down by nuclear bombs in the first few months after 9/11. With the lack of radiation, they transformed that into "special" nuclear bombs that magically didn't emit radiation. Later these guys were either labelled as embarrassments to their own side and marginalised, or labelled as disinfo agents by their own associates.
frostek 2 months ago
@rdbob61 CRETIN!
K9explo459 3 months ago
Wow Wonder what caused 5,000 human corpses to explode, vaporize in 12 seconds. In a collapse there would be floors left and people that looked like a grease spot not blown to bits by FIRE. It takes the human body in a controlled chamber 1800 degrees 2500 degrees to cremate from 1 1/2 to 4hours. Yet 911 Planes diesel fuel fire pulverized, vaporized bodies till 2,000 remain unidentified, unidentified by a fire. A fire who you trying to misinform??
rdbob61 4 months ago
@FutureLaugh Or just google 911 design parameters
bartman5347 4 months ago
@FutureLaugh Add the prefix and suffix
bartman5347 4 months ago
@FutureLaugh As a matter of fact they did.
911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/design
bartman5347 4 months ago
So now, everyone with a brain, who has a bit of knowledge of the basic laws of physics, and speaks out, is a conspiracy theorist? Either you are very stupid, or you are getting paid to suck satan's cock and misinform the public.
illdrew818 4 months ago
The awkward moment when Molten aluminium is silver :/ Debunking the debunked
lukealandrummond 4 months ago
What a bunch of bullshit. It was said in the video that steel bends and melts at 2700 degrees F and the fires got up for maybe 1800 degrees. So how did the buildings fall? It HAD to be an inside job plain and simple.
getalife04 4 months ago
@getalife04 no, it says that steel melts at 2750. Obviously it weakens (bends) at a much lower temperature. How could it both bend and melt at the same temperature? You either didn't pay attention or you're an idiot, plain and simple.
flouride666 4 months ago
@getalife04 How would being an inside job magically make 1800 degrees able to melt the steel in the towers when 1800 degrees under the mainstream story wouldn't? You agreed that the fires WERE burning at 1800 but still fell... so are you gonna say that ninjas sneaked into the twin towers at night and planted explosives? Please, save yourself from further embarrassment.
residentevilfan374 4 months ago
@residentevilfan374 You clearly don't know anything about how thermite explosives work. The point I was trying to make is that the fire didn't get hot enough to melt steel yet it DID. Jet fuel just doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel. If they used thermite explosive which are commonly used in demolition, fireworks etc. 6 weeks after the towers fell there was STILL molten steel buried under the rubble. Explain how that is possible with just jet fuel?
getalife04 4 months ago
@flouride666 Not "probably", or "likely", or in your own words again, "cannot accurately be compared". Facts. All of them. And oh yes, let's not forget you haven't addressed WTC 7 at all. You know, the one that just imploded for the hell of it, because it had a bad day. Seriously, it's not even worth debating with you any longer, since you believe that "unprecedented collapses make perfect sense". You have lost your ability to think for yourself and with an open mind. Don't ignore the facts!!!
bartman5347 4 months ago
@flouride666 "Unprecedented collapses make perfect sense?" That statement in itself speaks volumes about how completely brainwashed you are. You blindly believe everything the government says as truth and ignore the obvious facts. No steel structure building has ever collapsed from a plane crash. No steel structure building has ever collapsed from a fire. Larry Silverstein wanted to, and intended to destroy the buildings, and turned a 124million investment into 7billion . These are facts.
bartman5347 4 months ago
@bartman5347 i want you to think hard about how the event had no precedent, and why it makes sense that the result was unprecedented.
flouride666 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@flouride666 Look the crashes up on Wikipedia, or google them.
bartman5347 4 months ago
@flouride666 Another good one is the 2002 Pirelli Tower crash. And yes, that remained standing as well. Open you eyes to reality. What took place on 9/11 was simply not possible by the reasons the government suggests. It is so incredibly obvious it's not funny.
bartman5347 4 months ago
@bartman5347 so your answer to "how many instances before 9/11 were there of a passenger jet hitting a skyscraper?" is zero. Glad I could clear that up for you.
I would add that the crashes on 9/11 cannot accurately be compared to most other plane crashes, since they were intentionally crashed going as fast as possible. Normally pilots are resisting the crash.
But it isn't really necessary to even go there, since you admit there is no precedent. So unprecedented collapses make perfect sense
flouride666 4 months ago
@flouride666 There are MANY instances of planes crashing into buildings. But here's probably the best example: The B-25 bomber that crashed into the upper floors of the Empire State Building. Guess what? It didn't collapse. The towers were built much later to much stricter building codes. Coincidence? Well, you already know the answer to that, whether you want to admit or not.
bartman5347 4 months ago
@bartman5347 i suppose they build the world trade towers to sustain a 737 with no jet fuel lol
FutureLaugh 4 months ago
So to think that damage on the upper floors only of these buildings could cause entire collapses of both is preposterous. Not to mention, again, that nothing ever hit WTC 7, yet it imploded as well, supposedly from fires. The surrounding buildings closer to the towers had MUCH more damage than 7, yet they still remained standing. Why 7? No surprise here either. That is where the CIA, FBI, NIST, and several other agencies stored top secret records. Another coincidence? I think not.
bartman5347 4 months ago
@bartman5347 "So to think that damage on the upper floors only of these buildings could cause entire collapses of both is preposterous. " no, not at all. Detailed reports by qualified experts have explained exactly why this happened.
flouride666 4 months ago
There are far too many eyewitness accounts of people exiting the towers who have stated the lobbies of the buildings were completely demolished when they left, and also heard several explosions. The lobby didn't have a plane crash into it. Here is something interesting to watch and think about. Check out some posts of "failed implosions", or "failed building demolition". Some of these buildings remain standing, even after having the entire base of the structure blown out.
bartman5347 4 months ago
These are all documented facts.
bartman5347 4 months ago
By the way, his purchase price was 124 million.
bartman5347 4 months ago
@flouride666 He then went on to have them specifically insured against terrorist attacks in the amount of 7 billion dollars. Coincidence? I think not.
bartman5347 4 months ago
@bartman5347 the WTC had already been attacked by terrorists in the 90's. He'd have to be an idiot not to buy insurance. And of course, this is thus the opposite of coincidence.
flouride666 4 months ago
@flouride666 You are correct about one aspect about that. It was impossible to implode the towers without causing collateral damage to the other buildings. Which is one of the reasons that Larry Silverstein was turned down when he applied for a permit to have a controlled demo done. The other reason was asbestos. He was informed by the Port Authority that the buildings would have to be disassembled floor by floor at a cost of 15 billion. He had only recently purchased the buildings.
bartman5347 4 months ago
Wow! That is the most ridiculous post I have seen yet about the towers implosion. The towers were shut down numerous times previous to the events of 9/11, therefore giving more than ample opportunity to place all of the necessary charges. Wake up people!!! Two 150 floor buildings do not just collapse perfectly, and then continue to burn at over 1500 degrees for over 6 months, if it was merely plane crashes that caused the collapse of both. And yes Equus1965 is correct. NOTHING hit wtc 7.
bartman5347 4 months ago
@bartman5347 collapsed "perfectly" according to who? it may shock you to learn that a controlled demolition typically isn't designed to obliterate nearby buildings.
flouride666 4 months ago
And this "debunks" what? The collapse of three steel structured buildings because of fire (one would have been a major event as it has never happened before or since) all in one day and in the same city and the same complex. Yeah right. Wonders will never cease. WTC 7 had a minor fire by comparison and wasn't even hit by a plane yet it still collapsed in it's own footprint
Equus1965 4 months ago
@Equus1965 how many instances before 9/11 were there of a passenger jet hitting a skyscraper?
flouride666 4 months ago
@flouride666 What difference does it make? Firstly the towers were built to withstand the impact of a 707 (4 engined commercial airliner). Secondly, as previously stated, WTC 7 wasn't hit by an aircraft. The official reason given was that fire was the main factor in all three buildings. No steel structured building has ever collapsed because of fire prior to 9/11.
Equus1965 4 months ago
@Equus1965 you are incorrect. The NIST assertions are: "The WTC towers collapsed because: (1) the impact of the planes severed and damaged support columns, dislodged fireproofing insulation coating the steel floor trusses and steel columns, and widely dispersed jet fuel over multiple floors and (2) the... unusually large multi-floor fires significantly weakened the floors and columns...to the point where floors sagged and pulled inward on the perimeter columns."
flouride666 4 months ago
@Equus1965 "...This led to the inward bowing of the perimeter columns and failure of the south face of WTC 1 and the east face of WTC 2, initiating the collapse of each of the towers. "
as for the 707:
"The 707 that was considered in the design of the towers was estimated to have a weight of 263,000 lbs and speed of 180 mph; the Boeing 767-200ER aircraft that were used to attack the towers had an estimated gross weight of 274,000 pounds and flight speeds of 470 to 590 mph upon impact. "
flouride666 4 months ago
@flouride666 The cruising speed of a 707 was 575mph. I understand that the general populace will believe the "Official" story of 9/11 but there is too much that the commission seems to have elected to overlook. The remains of the Towers were spirited away to be re-cycled in China when ordinarily everything would have been gone over with a fine tooth comb. Three buildings collapse in the same complex in the same city and on the same day.
Equus1965 4 months ago
@Equus1965 the building was designed to withstand a 707 going 180 mph, one that was on its way to land at an airport and not crashed intentionally. This information is not hidden, anyone can look it up. The commission did not overlook it, you did.
flouride666 4 months ago
@flouride666 I didn't say that the commission overlooked this fact, specifically and so I have overlooked nothing. On the other hand you didn't feel the need to answer back with regard to the fact that the remains of the buildings were removed for disposal before any analysis could be carried out. That is a crime in itself
Equus1965 4 months ago
@Equus1965 again you are wrong. the steel was inspected, for over two years. the inspection process is exhaustively detailed in the NIST report titled "NIST NCSTAR - 1-3", available for anyone to read online anytime they want. Have you read it?
flouride666 4 months ago
@flouride666 You mean the fabrication that is called NIST NCSTAR
Equus1965 4 months ago
@Equus1965 right. well, when people describe you as a lunatic conspiracy theorist, this is what they're referring to. In the face of overwhelming evidence you simply decide that the evidence is "fabricated", despite having no evidence to support this assertion. You don't like the truth, so you decide it isn't the truth. What a total coward.
flouride666 4 months ago
@flouride666 Ha ha ha my word. Do you think that you're going to make me fall into line just because YOU call me a coward. Don't make me laugh you ridiculous excuse for a human being. I stand up for what I believe in and I won't back down regardless of the odds. Get real for goodness sake. Open your eyes and start to question what they're telling you. Be a man for once in your life and stand up for what is right. The pursuit of truth is not cowardly. Have the last word little man, be my guest
Equus1965 4 months ago
@Equus1965 as I have exhaustively demonstrated, you are not pursuing truth. you prefer lies, BS and fantasy. Like a child.
flouride666 4 months ago
Respond to this video... You'd get better odds on a three-legged horse winning the Kentucky Derby
Equus1965 4 months ago
Hey mrPatriot1776 how do you like your rights being taken away 1 at a time? pretty badass huh?
MrRoachclips 4 months ago
nice vid u sure debunked it and funny how every animated 911 is off its pretty hard to replicate false evidence as truth cause it doesnt fall in place and it lacks god work~!
MrEugenelevy 4 months ago
your "debunking" had more "probablly's than any theory/truth explanation.
Nano thermite paint. Elevator repair. Security furloughs.
HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT
punapeter 4 months ago
@punapeter Nano Thermite paint? do you have any idea what your talking about? please dont quote the descredited crap from Mr Jones and co. Tell me how you will detonate nano thermite paint, bear in mind that thermite is notoriously difficult to detonate, so unreliable it is not used in CD. By the way do you mean nano thermate? Truthers started this same accusation years ago first thermite, proved not possible so it then became thermate, again not poss, so now its nano thermite / ate
K9explo459 3 months ago
@K9explo459 HA your an ignorant person living in a world where you believe you have covered all possibilities...The Army was using thermite grenades in WW2. They were used to melt through steel targets such as artillery batteries and hard metal equipment. So your argument about thermite being too hard to detonate is baseless and embarrassing to yourself. In fact the technology you speak of has been perfected for over half a century you dumb, arrogant, cowardly fuck!!! dont try to act smart
AntBanks2626 2 months ago
@AntBanks2626 You really have no idea what you are talking about, keep your insults to yourself. If you dont have the intelligence to refrain from obscene language I dont have any intention of conversing with you.
K9explo459 2 months ago
@K9explo459 haha thats all you can say!!! You have nothing to say because you keep thinking that thermite grenades didnt exist when in fact they have been used by our own military for almost a century. Your the idiot on You Tube telling people they dont know what they are talking about when you dont know shit! So my advice to you is Shut the Fuck up! Go learn something about the material before you speak out loud. I know what im talking about its clear that you dont and I think its funny!
AntBanks2626 2 months ago
@AntBanks2626 I am fully aware that themite was used in grenades to destroy primarily ammunition during the last war, what the hell has that got to do with 'thermite paint? I assume you know the difference in the explosive capabilities? I have been involved using explosives within the military for 20 years, you still have no idea what you are talking about, just a big and foul mouth and no intelligence. Go away little boy. Bye bye
K9explo459 2 months ago
@AntBanks2626 I think everyone is getting the "thermite" wrong. It was invented for smelting origanally. The explosive version came later with introducing more chemicals. The reaction rate can be also tuned with particle sizes; coarser particles burn slower than finer particles. The effect is more pronounced with the particles requiring being heated to higher temperature to start reacting. This effect is pushed to the extreme with nano-thermites, thermates burn with evolution of flame and gases.
Fred420ist 4 weeks ago
Molten Aluminum DOES NOT GLOW
fixationstudios 4 months ago
The buildings turn to dust explain that.
MrKenneth0909 4 months ago
this video is a waste of time...
cashox3 4 months ago 2
Who would say this is fake?Do they not know how this event affected America?
My brother joined the military because of this event,when my mom first heard that she couldn't stop crying.
dasdew2 4 months ago
Here is a good question, i wonder if the terrorists had any idea that crashing 2 planes would bring down three buildings.
FutureLaugh 4 months ago 14
@FutureLaugh Well, there were four planes, and four buildings were either hit or destroyed. The reason there is no debris from a plane in Shanksville is that was the location of a secret terrorist space/time wormhole that transported that plane into WTC 7 to bring it down. Four planes, four buildings. That tallies. And if one cruise missile/plane malfunctions you still gotta blow the charges in WTC 7 as planned.
cryosun 4 months ago
Respond to this video... I used to pour aluminium at a foundry. The AL we used to heat to cherry red before pouring, to be sure it was fluid enough to fill the mold before freezing. It took about 40 minutes in a forced air BLAST FURNACE to get it hot enough. When we poured it turned silvery the instant is splashed against anything. The metal in your vid is steel, the way it sparks as it splashes, the way it keeps glowing through the cool air as it burns in oxygen. Clearly steel.
cryosun 4 months ago
Oh, yes, and when I weld aluminium and its sparks fly through the air, they burn a brilliant white color, not the yellow of steel being welded or cut by a torch or plasma cutter. Aluminium is used for white stars in fireworks (magnesium is too unreliable). So if your AL droplets are hot enough to glow enough to be seen in daylight, they would burn bright white. Yellow is just impossible for AL. Bright yellow spatter with forking sparks is steel for anyone who has ever worked with the stuff.
cryosun 4 months ago
@cryosun This is a bright piece of intel- i think somebody should note this and perform an experiment
FutureLaugh 4 months ago
@cryosun no doubt you are right about what happens in a foundry to pure aluminium under controlled conditions. You are ignoring the fact that whatever came out of the buildings would have been contaminated by a myriad of different things.
K9explo459 3 months ago
@FutureLaugh in the supposed confession video starring osama bin laden, he said that he did not expect them to fall down.
NY10909 4 months ago
@NY10909 well then holy shit could you imagine his face when 3 buildings fell instead? probably looked sort of like Larry Silverstien when he got that insurance plan- specifically in case terrorists crash planes into the towers?
FutureLaugh 4 months ago
@FutureLaugh yeah, he got "plane crashing into my building" insurance. right
flouride666 4 months ago
@FutureLaugh hah, no doubt, wtc 7 was just the cherry to top it all off. And i saw how Silverstien increased his insurance specifically in terrorism just prior to 9/11.. funny how blatantly obvious it all is... but the media and government just slaps the word terror on anything and the sheep eat it up.
NY10909 4 months ago
@NY10909 google silverstien "on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building" It was a fox news hit piece against jesse ventura and they admitted that piece of information... only incriminating him more!
FutureLaugh 4 months ago
@FutureLaugh i havent heard about the on the phone thing, but i did see a interview of silverstein where he admits he gave the go ahead to "pull it" which in demolition terms means to bring down a building.. What i cant figure out is why the sprinkler systems in the building we're unable to contain fires cause by nothing more than falling debris.
NY10909 4 months ago
@NY10909 I dont understand how the insurance company can fork over all that money when they werent allowed to investigate themselves? You dont hand over 500 million to a guy who was asking you if he can blow the building up- and then turn around and say "oh never mind, it just fell over anyway- you know all those fires and all"
FutureLaugh 4 months ago
@FutureLaugh that isn't a question
flouride666 4 months ago
@FutureLaugh Lol my friend no comment on that one ;D
sheyon1000 4 months ago
I don't know where you got that chart, but poured molten aluminum absolutely does look completely silver at 1800º f. I have seen it myself. Your video is BS.
AntiAlGore001 4 months ago 13
@AntiAlGore001 You are assuming it is not mixed with other materials. Aluminum in a controlled environment like a foundry would be a silvery color, but this is not a controlled environment. It would have mixed with other metal objects that may have melted and would also likely have other debris mixed in with it. This would have altered the color. Ever seen an aluminum can melt? I have. The can melts and stays silvery but the color coating on the outside glows red as it burns away.
MrAwsome514 3 months ago
@AntiAlGore001 drjudywood com/articles/aluminum/Aluminum_Glows. that is where the chart is and an article. u tube wouldnt let me post the full address for some reason hopefully there is enough of it left for you to find the article
K9explo459 3 months ago
@AntiAlGore001 Yes, this is not a color chart for aluminum but perhaps for steel. I wish I could eliminate the idea of the metal having been lead or copper. One of the impacted floors comprised batteries for an electrical back up power supply for the tenant above, so many that the floor had to be strengthened for the tenant's purpose. These would have produced a lot of lead (the plates) and copper (the connecting harnesses).
FirstUsedBooks 3 months ago
Except ur forgetting they found thermite residue in the debris and 5 ft thick steel beams bent into u shaped pieces without cracking or breaking at all u moron. That takes alot of heat!! Explosions before the planes even hit also.
MiellDuBz 4 months ago
This it how a steel frame building burns in reality and this burned for days not 1.5 hrs youtube.com/watch?v=9E4kCS-LsFI
galaxything 4 months ago
It's thermite, and it was not set off prematurly, it was doing exactly as was intended . And NO the floors above did not crush floors below as seen here the building is destroyed from the top down with NOTHING above the point of destruction youtube.com/watch?v=EgN080yySe0
galaxything 4 months ago
Thank you for your reply, but the fires weren't hot enough - and the impact, whilst it may have weakened key steel girders could never account for this being one the three only EVER buildings achieving free fall speed collapses without assistance! Thermite was used look at some of the standing ground based girders and the angle and perfectness of the theirs slicing -perfect to create sheer and the drop at the base to guarantee to perfect 100% free fall collapse. Sorry but your are so so wrong.
dazzer01 4 months ago
Dimitri Khalezov explains 911.
Massaricossudo 4 months ago
/watch?v=hVaGht6eHoQ
/watch?v=KhdppHwUJ9k
/watch?v=iGqjzFQvfdI
/watch?v=WxqoChniKVU
/watch?v=9QWvkAgyIY4
/watch?v=qFpbZ-aLDLY
/watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE
/watch?v=HSjDCwN2i3w
/watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ
/watch?v=zhnNy5EsebA
megamogx 4 months ago
It's true to say Aluminium burns at a much lower temperature (ref: the Falklands war and UK warships made of Aluminium (never again I hope)) But it's sort of irrelevant you are using this to prove a point which states these three buildings (inc Building 7) were taken down by Aluminium fires - just impossible. Poor research and poor argument. Sorry for you. Shame
dazzer01 4 months ago 2
@dazzer01 The aluminum fires account for the red molten liquid coming out of the windows and eliminate the possibility of thermite.... what actually took down the buildings was having some support columns that were completely wiped out by the plane's impact and the rest being weakened by the fires.
residentevilfan374 4 months ago
iluminatie paid everybody off to lie . O well , there all up with God or down stairs with iluminaties. Any Jews die in this ? No, not one .
GalaticSpaceHero 4 months ago
@GalaticSpaceHero Have you, or your source for that "fact," gone through the entire list of 9/11 victims and verified that none of them are Jews?
residentevilfan374 4 months ago
@residentevilfan374 No , not one Jew . Madoff told them to stay out the building according my source.
GalaticSpaceHero 4 months ago
Max temperature for flame from jet fuel, 1800 degrees.. It takes over 2,000 or more to even bend/melt steel..
Reymius 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Reymius "Max temperature for flame from jet fuel, 1800 degrees." - The jet fuel was only the ignition source and was not responsible for the high temperatures.... Building fires however can reach 1000C...
markh1011 4 months ago
Wow - totally debunked. I'm now a believer that muslims did it. And that the govt didn't, had nothing to gain, and always is looking out for the publics best interest.
Thanks for this informative video ;-)
bradjacob 5 months ago 2
THERE IS PLENTY OF PROOF IT WAS MOLTEN IRON... JUST GO TO THE POLICE MUSEUM AND SEE FOR YOURSELF... ANYTIME THERE IS MOLTEN IRON AND CONCRETE INFUSED TOGETHER NATIONAL STANDARD IS TO TEST FOR EXPLOSIVES.. WHY DID THEY NOT TEST THEN!!!
bigjriddell1 5 months ago
first off molten iron appears bright yellow... ur wrong cause if thermite can cut through steel like it wasn't there, it could easily heat up to 4500 degrees within 45 seconds causing the steel rods in the center of the building to just horseshoe and collapse and melt for a minute or so before cooling down, this also explains the molten pile of metal under the debris 6 weeks after the buildings fell. This would also explain why it fell soon after this video. Soooo... your wrong patna ;)
yumsforlife 5 months ago
@yumsforlife "thermite can cut through steel like it wasn't there," - Yet no suspiciously cut columns were found by anyone...
"and melt for a minute or so before cooling down" - You claim it would burn quickly and then cool... and at the same time you claim it will remain hot for 6 weeks? You're contradicting yourself.
Thermate, thermite, superdooperthermite is a terrible explanation for molten metal weeks later as they burn quickly and very brightly... it would be so obvious.
markh1011 5 months ago
@markh1011
And "jet fuel" melting iron is an even more ridiculous theory, hahaha....
bradjacob 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bradjacob "And "jet fuel" melting iron " - Where is your evidence that happened?
markh1011 5 months ago
@markh1011 ok first off if u watch the smithsonian video of 9/11 u can see (if u look very closely) columns that are just cut in half, second when i said cool down i ment a couple hundread degrees, thermite is used for quick cutting through large columns, but in this situation it couldve been a simple,easy,quick and shady terrorist attack, oh wait it was,
yumsforlife 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@yumsforlife "columns that are just cut in half," - Where? What video and what time.
"thermite is used for quick cutting through large columns," - Not one person found any suspiciously cut columns. Not one. Thousands were involved in the clean up, including demo experts and engineers. Nothing. It would be so obvious that the very idea of it is ridiculous.
markh1011 4 months ago
@markh1011----------and thirdly there was too much smoke coming out of the building, too much sunlight beaming down, and too small of windows for you to have seen it burning in the outmost central parts of building so don't come at me because i expect you to understand things that go without saying :I
yumsforlife 4 months ago
@yumsforlife "nd thirdly there was too much smoke coming out of the building" - Too much smoke? What did you base this on?
"too much sunlight beaming down," - ?
"and too small of windows for you to have seen it burning in the outmost central parts of building so don't come at me because i expect you to understand things that go without saying :I" - Go without saying? Sorry but I don't understand what your point is here at all. Please re-phrase.
markh1011 4 months ago
Respond to this video... oh yeah and even though thermite is used to weld things like -columns and railroad pieces and stuff like that, this case is different, for one there is alot of pressure and weight on each individual column, two there was 2 FULL tanks of jet fuel burning at the same time that the columns were being cut by thermite(or could have been) there for weakening the entire structure at least 65% causing a shift in weight to the giant hole that in the building.
yumsforlife 4 months ago
@markh1011 this casued a the callapse because the twin towers were meant to be able to withstand these types of disasters. THAT is the best explination i have and if you see any holes in my theory tell me and ill fill it
yumsforlife 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@yumsforlife "this casued a the callapse because the twin towers were meant to be able to withstand these types of disasters" - One of the designers has said that they considered the collision of a 707 flying slowly potentially lost in fog.. and that they didn't consider the jet fuel.
markh1011 4 months ago
@yumsforlife
Watch Dimitri Khalezov's interview....
Massaricossudo 3 months ago
@yumsforlife your entire presumption is a hole. the towers were not built to withstand what happened to them. so it is not surprising at all that they collapsed
flouride666 3 months ago
aluminum melts to a silver liquid...
mrwizard319 5 months ago
this still doesn't explain why they found molten steel in the wreckage after the collapse of all 3 buildings. Experts have all said that the fires didn't burn hot enough to create the molten steel. whats dripping out of the building may well be aluminum but it still doesn't explain the molten steel in the rubble. Not to mention the fact that multiple independent experts did tests on the dust and debris from the towers and found Thermite evident.
sgelinas87 5 months ago
@experts also said that wall street couldnt collapse, dont believe everything you here alot of these "experts" use fake evidence to further their cause
d3ltadrive 5 months ago
@sgelinas87 "Experts have all said that the fires didn't burn hot enough to create the molten steel" - No one ever confirmed it was actually steel that was molten. There were other metals there with a much lower melting point that look the same...
"Not to mention the fact that multiple independent experts did tests" - Actually no. When experts like USGS and the R J Lee group did tests they didn't find anything suspicious.... only the kook scientists claim they did.
markh1011 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sgelinas87 "experts did tests on the dust and debris from the towers and found Thermite evident" .. and the report from Jones and Harrit actually confirmed that it WASN'T thermite.
markh1011 5 months ago
for those that do not believe it happened or it was just a Conspiracy you need to check out this web site!
popularmechanics - technology - military - news - 1227842
jwehr192 5 months ago
ok bush
mcmattyo10 5 months ago
What a crap video!
antivoterfraud 5 months ago
This video is the crowning work of a patriot !
No mention how the office fires in bldg. 7 . even though there was no aluminum from planes to drip molton lava , came down (in it's own footprint) and the "patriot" who stands by the official version of this event , proves that patriotism can cause blindness to truth and can provide a lasting hiding place for a fool who needs a safe place to stroke himself !
rolynstone48 5 months ago 2
well all i seem to be hearing for nearly the last 10 years is molten steel here molten metal there. but i havent heard but just a few rationally thinking people say did the steel in the towers need to be in "molten" stage to collaspes ? yes would be the answer. NOW wouldnt steel heated to the degree of merely "softening" cause a collapse ? i would think that also would be a BIG FUCKING YES ! and i have no doubts that between the impact damage and "softening" did those towers in
restlessbreed10 5 months ago
some of the neocon warmongers and the 9/11 inside job theory does not work with their warmongering ways...so they discount the facts and continue believing that the enemy is exactly as the televisions says it is. The warmongering neocons want their enemies lined up like ducks in a row...they cannot manage anything else...
se7ensnakes 5 months ago
The only thing debunked here is that the makers of the video are telling the truth. NO! This is all lies and cover-up. Aluminum, which I've melted and cast personally is silver when melted. It does not glow at all. INVESTIGATE. ACT.
beastshawnee 5 months ago
And I'm sure we were actually attacked at the gulf of Tonkins, and Iraq did have WMD. The government would never cover up any kind of foul play. Damn conspiracy theorist need to go back to there corner with there tin foil caps! HaHaHa!!!
Too many blind patriots! You need to wake up and listent to the experts, not the govt paid guys. I can't believe how blind some people can be.
ChinoV 5 months ago
The outer columns were obviously NOT the supporting steel beams. Aluminum does NOT burn & melt like that, you know nothing about metal works, period. And, you avoided the sure evidence of smaller explosions that occurred in consecutive-fashion from below the plane's impact zone which OBVIOUSLY led to the collapse of the building. You know nothing about structures & architectures.
KrazeDiamond 5 months ago
Nice try joe, or would it be Jacob?
I have long experience with different metals and aluminum does not catch fire like we see on those images, nor it turns orange.
Something is visibly burning, on fire, at very high temperatures.
Keep trying, but there is much more evidence on the contrary.
You cannot change the truth...
Zecamala1234 5 months ago
"This is a myth often put forth by conspiracy theorists." Bollocks. It is a fact put forward by expert witnesses.
microcephalec 5 months ago
BAD science dude! You CANNOT melt FORGED sheet aluminium with kerosene! PLUS the fires are burning BLACK, which shows they were starved for oxygen! no wear near optimal tempuerature to melt anything more than plastic and the hopes of ignorant people! EXPLORE the money trail of 9/11. THERE you will debunk yourself!
ricklicks42 5 months ago
You haven't thought this through. The outer structure is not what the perps would be aiming to affect.
Lemonsqueezerx 5 months ago
Conspiracy theorists wouldnt even know the meaning of thermite but they use it 2 prove 2 themselves theyre somekind of scientific geniuses when in reality theyre just numbnuts! haha They probably heard it somewhere so they thought yep that will do we run with that!! LOL
westnblu 5 months ago
@westnblu that's what 'wanna be debunkers' always do ;) they think they can debunk everything, by employing fallacious reasoning or ignoring data that contradicts their priori worldview.
Lietuvispartizan 5 months ago
you are blind patriot ;)
hugejoint 5 months ago
Is this the best the "debunkers" can do? Some stupid teenager on a laptop with sony vegas making claims backed up by nothing? Must be.
EvilIntentions01 5 months ago
youtube.com/watch?v=xbY5_qtz83M
JohnClaypool 6 months ago
zionist bitch
GalacticVacuum 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if this true how come it was found in building 7
nb45001 6 months ago
So, military grade thermite came from the plane??? I am sure it helps them to fly... LOL
olaolga 6 months ago
If its impossible, then why was traces of thermite found?
audiofiend80 6 months ago
@audiofiend80 thermite = Iron oxide + aluminium
Iron + oxygen(air) => iron oxide
Aluminium is used in construction
angel11811 6 months ago
The floors supported their own weight as well as live loads, providing lateral stability to the exterior walls and distributing wind loads among the exterior walls.[33] The floors consisted of 4 inches (10 cm) thick lightweight concrete slabs laid on a fluted steel deck. A grid of lightweight bridging trusses and main trusses supported the floors.[34] The trusses connected to the perimeter at alternate columns and were on 6 foot 8 inch (2.03 m) centers.
audiofiend80 6 months ago
The core of the towers housed the elevator and utility shafts, restrooms, three stairwells, and other support spaces. The core –a combined steel and concrete structure of each tower was a rectangular area 87 by 135 feet (27 by 41 m) and contained 47 steel columns running from the bedrock to the top of the tower. The large, column-free space between the perimeter and core was bridged by prefabricated floor trusses
audiofiend80 6 months ago
The only problem with this (same as all the 'debunking' videos I have seen) is that it debunks nothing but merely offers an alternative view, which is fine, but it doesn't stand up to scrutiny. It doesn't answer the near free fall, it doesn't answer Building 7, it doesn't answer the plethora of witnesses who saw molten steel months after the even (despite being under water), it doesn't answer the lies and distortions in the Commission, the foreknowledge, the stand downs. It just gives opinion.
md1807 6 months ago
@md1807 simple fact can demolish all conspiracy theories , 9/11 was alqaeda (call it CIA if you want...), 11M madrid's train bombing , also organized by alqaeda ,wich kicked out the conservative side off the power , because of confusion and misinformation. OBM made communicates reivindicating both . If this was an inside job , why would bush , organize another attack in spain , wich would led Aznar (Bush's ally)lose his power (on the elections), and lose an ally in iraq? and then repeat it in UK
angel11811 6 months ago
Nice globalization wall paper on your homepage.
TheOringinalBRad 7 months ago
Illuminati founded in 1776
TheOringinalBRad 7 months ago
You'd be more of a Patriot if you stand by your country and for the people who died ! Than by the lies of 911 done for $ / war / and select few !
Rohk1 7 months ago
What fucking horseshit lies. MAYBE, Probably, possibly,likely,ALL FUCKING MAYBE'S & CONJECTURE WITH ABSOLUTELY NO FACTS. SOUNDS LIKE
RKOASSHOLE has been here,ALL his videos are sheer lies,guesses,conjecture & STUPIDITY & OH YEAH conspiracy theory. LOL FUCKING LOSER-just like the douche that repasted this horseshit.
ed11561 7 months ago
@TheDeparted112570 YOUR THE IDIOT ! OVER 1000 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS AND PHYSICIST'S SAID TWIN TOWERS COULDNT HAVE ! pLUS THE 3RD BUILDING HAD AN OFFICE FIRE AND CAM DOWN THE SAME EXACT WAY LOL ! WAKE UP . NOT TO MENTION THERES NO PLANE PIECES AT EITHER OF OTHER 2 SITES ! DO SOME RESEARCH ON YOUR OWN ! IF YOUR NOT AN IDIOT YOU WILL SEE THERE IS NO WAY ANYTHING ON THAT DAY MAKES SENSE !
Rohk1 7 months ago
um didn't scientists actually find large amounts of thermite in the towers?
AhzekAhriman1 7 months ago