Fantastic to see a 950 running again - ah that motor sound – it brings it all back - hope it’s still going. I had one for a few years – cost me £749.99 and was one of the last ever batch. I understand their a bitch to work on and needed very careful setting up. The C9 wasn’t as sexy and the sound was very poor (being stereo but LOW FI) but I felt had a better picture – had my re-headed twice but gave it away with about 300 beta tapes to a friend (who was a big Beta fan) many years ago
in the uk at the time no one bought video recorders we rented them and VHS was cheaper but the more techy types saw BETA as it was,a better quality system.
please note that BETA as a pro format is still used the betacam tape also digital are used with hdd storage.
funny how people picked more storage over better picture quality with betamax and vhs, similar thing with bluray and hd dvd, same performance just one had double storage for double the price
Still own many different Beta decks. Early on, the industrail Beta I had a lot of drop out issues. As a matter course, we would never record on the first few minutes of tape even after the format matured. We have hundreds of Beta I tapes in our archives and most of them still look great. I always loved skip scan and had a Beta Hifi deck when they were first released. The technology was always better than VHS.
Que tal Macolest, como te va!!!, conseguí un beta, es un sony sl - f60 me lo regaló un vecino, y funciona bien!!, pena que solo tenía una cinta, hace años tiró unas 20 a la basura!!!!, ahora ando buscando cintas por rastrillos, y tiendas de 2ª mano xd!!, esta jodida la cosa!!!!
Super Beta was a bit sharper than Regular Beta. Definately better than VHS, but NOT SuperVHS. When combined with a Ultra high quality tape and the highest speed possible, these looked amazing, for the time. This was obvioulsy not Betacam, but rather B-II. For the record, Hi-8 tapes looked a lot better than this. Cr@p! Even Video-8 tapes looked better than this, when using a high quality tape.
Si, y ese con todos los leds funcionando! y como suena!
Que lástima que muriera tu V2000, las paginas que me dices si las habia visto tambien varios videos en youtbe, me referia que no he visto en real un V2000.
El mio era de mi tio, y siempre quise uno desde que lo vi con 7 años o asi, finalmente en 2007 conseguí que me lo diera :D!!!
@macolest Puedes verlos en la pag. PHILIPS VIDEO 2000, y también en esta otra The V2000 Gallery, el mío es el vr 2334, me falló el arrastre, y me ralló 3 cintas, lo lleve al técnico y no tuvo arreglo lo guarde en una caja, con sus cintas y todo, y el sabado al sacarlo para limpiarle el polvo, lo enchufe y no enciende, se murió, pero no lo pieso tirar, para mí es parte de mi pasado lo compraron mis padres en 1984, cuando yo tenía 7 años, costo 145.000 ptas de las de entonces
yeah man you make the right thing, betacam tape is the best option in a super beta video recorder like the video tape super vhs and a sony broadcast video tape for super vhs, the last tape the picture quality is superior in all the senses
@lieckenske Its not that simple, both VHS and Beta had their advantages and disadvantages, Beta was developed from professional grade tapes, hence its better image quality... It didn't become so famous because Sony was quite greedy and held the format rights for themeselves and only a handful of brands, while JVC gave their VHS to more manufacurers, hence its greater popularity
Judging by the fact that mine was a lower-end machine and it survived, yours probably survive a nuclear bomb lol! Great VCR! 5 stars for a magnifico beta!
ah yes that was it natsir88....i remeber something about the incompatibility when i worked with Betacam SP all those years ago....i remember also someone telling me you could work round it by using a SP shell and putting 1/2" tape in it...providing you splice foil leader instead of VHS clear leader...or something like that.
Not strictly correct. When Betacam was developed by Sony, the tapes were oxide and able to be used in consumer Betamax machines. When Betacam SP (superior performance) was released in the late 80s, the SP tape formulations being metal particle were too harsh to be used in consumer Betamax machines.
The wide aspect ratio is not found in analog cassettes, that I know of (Anamophic lenses left the image squeezed to the center and looking awful as a result) I record in the B-I speed on the highest end decks I could purchase. Most are still in demand for a price because they offer the most editing features from Beta. The HF1000 is thought to be the best. Sony even has their best EV-S7000 Hi8 deck selling around $700 used!
"TV lines" (analog video) are commonly mistaken to be a "pixel" measurement in the digital sense, but actually refer the level of horizontal resolution in one line. Each individual line is a continuous signal, with the amount of detail limited by the available video bandwidth. The vertical resolution of any standard analog video system is always 480 or 576 lines. The analog signal off tape is digitally sampled by the plasma TV's display processor (likely at 720x576) and scaled-up for display.
That's exactly the common misconception I was trying to clear up. "250 lines" refers to the number of distinct vertical lines that can be resolved on a test chart (so it is something like a horizontal measurement) but the number of scanlines containing picture information is always around 480/576 (525/625 including the blanking interval and sync.) To look at it another way, the signal you get back from a VHS tape is "blurred" horizontally a bit compared to the original.
@kawaiifreak860 250 HORIZONTAL lines. That's TVL. The vertical lines are to the dimensions of 483, 241.5 per field, 50 fields per second. It can be down to 220TVL, but it's still 483i (or where I am (or was depending on when you read this) 576i).
483 lines would be insane resolution. 220 lines is 333x483i or 333x576i, and 420 lines (Hi8) is 560x483i or 560x576i.
Fantastico vcr ! que nostalgia !
philosoma9 3 months ago
Fantastic to see a 950 running again - ah that motor sound – it brings it all back - hope it’s still going. I had one for a few years – cost me £749.99 and was one of the last ever batch. I understand their a bitch to work on and needed very careful setting up. The C9 wasn’t as sexy and the sound was very poor (being stereo but LOW FI) but I felt had a better picture – had my re-headed twice but gave it away with about 300 beta tapes to a friend (who was a big Beta fan) many years ago
mikeismad61 7 months ago
in the uk at the time no one bought video recorders we rented them and VHS was cheaper but the more techy types saw BETA as it was,a better quality system.
please note that BETA as a pro format is still used the betacam tape also digital are used with hdd storage.
brybish 8 months ago
the best beta machine ever!
Crossfire44 1 year ago
funny how people picked more storage over better picture quality with betamax and vhs, similar thing with bluray and hd dvd, same performance just one had double storage for double the price
MustanGT2003 1 year ago
You were able to record a DVD to BetaMax?
Riddler95 1 year ago
@Riddler95 yes, with a RCA to BNC adaptor,. Connecting the video and audio outputs from the DVD player to the Beta inputs.
thanks for comment
macolest 1 year ago
whats the difference between betamax tapes and betacam ive a slf-30 made by sony and chearch tapes to running this old machine.
here in holland betamax didnt use since the rly 80 vhs won the race
but the picture quality from betamax is mutch better
dannyjaar 1 year ago
dude, that is so cool
bpmagruder 1 year ago
Still own many different Beta decks. Early on, the industrail Beta I had a lot of drop out issues. As a matter course, we would never record on the first few minutes of tape even after the format matured. We have hundreds of Beta I tapes in our archives and most of them still look great. I always loved skip scan and had a Beta Hifi deck when they were first released. The technology was always better than VHS.
newhampshirevideo 1 year ago
Que tal Macolest, como te va!!!, conseguí un beta, es un sony sl - f60 me lo regaló un vecino, y funciona bien!!, pena que solo tenía una cinta, hace años tiró unas 20 a la basura!!!!, ahora ando buscando cintas por rastrillos, y tiendas de 2ª mano xd!!, esta jodida la cosa!!!!
psbilo 1 year ago
I adore these outdated mechanical machineries. The more moving parts the better!
ftpaddict 1 year ago
Super Beta was a bit sharper than Regular Beta. Definately better than VHS, but NOT SuperVHS. When combined with a Ultra high quality tape and the highest speed possible, these looked amazing, for the time. This was obvioulsy not Betacam, but rather B-II. For the record, Hi-8 tapes looked a lot better than this. Cr@p! Even Video-8 tapes looked better than this, when using a high quality tape.
gznubouit 1 year ago
Has visto el video de 0raffie0, tambien tiene un SB!!!
psbilo 1 year ago
@psbilo
Si, y ese con todos los leds funcionando! y como suena!
Que lástima que muriera tu V2000, las paginas que me dices si las habia visto tambien varios videos en youtbe, me referia que no he visto en real un V2000.
El mio era de mi tio, y siempre quise uno desde que lo vi con 7 años o asi, finalmente en 2007 conseguí que me lo diera :D!!!
macolest 1 year ago
Cuidalo mucho tío, tienes una joya, yo tengo un V2000, EL VR 2334, pero no enciende, BETAMAX Y V2000 ERAN LOS MEJORES VCR,S
psbilo 1 year ago
@psbilo que lástima que no te funcione el V2000, nunca he visto uno.
Este betamax lo cuido y cuidaré como una joya!!
espero subir mas vídeos cuando tenga una camara hd para apreciar toda la calidad.
gracias por comentar.
macolest 1 year ago
@macolest Puedes verlos en la pag. PHILIPS VIDEO 2000, y también en esta otra The V2000 Gallery, el mío es el vr 2334, me falló el arrastre, y me ralló 3 cintas, lo lleve al técnico y no tuvo arreglo lo guarde en una caja, con sus cintas y todo, y el sabado al sacarlo para limpiarle el polvo, lo enchufe y no enciende, se murió, pero no lo pieso tirar, para mí es parte de mi pasado lo compraron mis padres en 1984, cuando yo tenía 7 años, costo 145.000 ptas de las de entonces
psbilo 1 year ago
@psbilo Beta y V2000.......Cuando se invente la maquina del tiempo volveremos !
philosoma9 3 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you know what works real good?..watching the dvd.
cloontrooper 2 years ago
the picture and sound quality remember of my JVC editing recorder CR850-U
guimbadriver 2 years ago
yeah man you make the right thing, betacam tape is the best option in a super beta video recorder like the video tape super vhs and a sony broadcast video tape for super vhs, the last tape the picture quality is superior in all the senses
guimbadriver 2 years ago
Dang...got lost in watching LOTR there that I totally forgot it was betamax lol.
Bender1001 2 years ago
Nice!
HDCAMAN 2 years ago
what a wonderful machine. it's a pity they don't make devices as good as this anymore. i wish i had one of those.
rajithaify 2 years ago
This is really much better than VHS, why didn't it become so famous?
lieckenske 2 years ago 5
@lieckenske Cost was higher I believe.
Dant2142 1 year ago
@Dant2142 That, and VHS tapes could always record more than Beta tapes.
vantageIIx 1 year ago
@lieckenske Because the electronics for the VHS format was cheaper.
yTubeBlowsBigBalls 1 year ago
@yTubeBlowsBigBalls a pity :)
lieckenske 1 year ago
@lieckenske Its not that simple, both VHS and Beta had their advantages and disadvantages, Beta was developed from professional grade tapes, hence its better image quality... It didn't become so famous because Sony was quite greedy and held the format rights for themeselves and only a handful of brands, while JVC gave their VHS to more manufacurers, hence its greater popularity
Huelva 6 months ago
My SL-HF400 Beta has been in my garage for 7 years and I pulled it out today and it still works XD!
MRLOL785 2 years ago
Post a video! plz
macolest 2 years ago
I don't have any movie making program like iMovie or Windows Movie Maker and I don't have any tape for the beta. I'll try though:)
MRLOL785 2 years ago
Judging by the fact that mine was a lower-end machine and it survived, yours probably survive a nuclear bomb lol! Great VCR! 5 stars for a magnifico beta!
MRLOL785 2 years ago
ah yes that was it natsir88....i remeber something about the incompatibility when i worked with Betacam SP all those years ago....i remember also someone telling me you could work round it by using a SP shell and putting 1/2" tape in it...providing you splice foil leader instead of VHS clear leader...or something like that.
davisneil 2 years ago
its highly unadvisable to use betacam broadcast tapes on a beta VCR. the oxide is much different and has been known to rip heads to shreds!
davisneil 2 years ago 5
thanks for the advice
macolest 2 years ago
I was certain the early Betacam tapes were the same material as Pro-X.
It was the Betacam SP tapes that changed the material of the tape itself.
hakemon 2 years ago
Doesn't matter, the early BetaCam tapes are interchangeable both ways.
For the uninitiated, BetaCam FORMAT is not the same as BetaMax, but both use similar cassettes.
deepfreezevideo 2 years ago
Comment removed
natsirt88 2 years ago
Not strictly correct. When Betacam was developed by Sony, the tapes were oxide and able to be used in consumer Betamax machines. When Betacam SP (superior performance) was released in the late 80s, the SP tape formulations being metal particle were too harsh to be used in consumer Betamax machines.
natsirt88 2 years ago
All I can say is, I Want!!! I have a SL-F1UB kit (including the camera!!!) and it's great, but the one in this video is the bees knees!!! :D
twocvbloke 3 years ago
Did you record a DVD on to the tape?
TVperson1 3 years ago
Yes, this demo was recorded from a DVD
macolest 3 years ago
The wide aspect ratio is not found in analog cassettes, that I know of (Anamophic lenses left the image squeezed to the center and looking awful as a result) I record in the B-I speed on the highest end decks I could purchase. Most are still in demand for a price because they offer the most editing features from Beta. The HF1000 is thought to be the best. Sony even has their best EV-S7000 Hi8 deck selling around $700 used!
MetallicBill 3 years ago
Did you tape that film on B I speed? Most machines have B II and B III only. I do love your Betamax. It's a wonderful machine.
thx2468 3 years ago
This machine is a European PAL model, and hasn't B I, II or III modes, just SP speed (1.8cm/s - like 2cm/s BII mode).
Yeah! it's a brilliant and dreamy machine.
Thx for comment.
macolest 3 years ago
What is the model of the Panasonic plasma panel? And what is the diagonal size?
Vladislaw81 3 years ago
Panasonic model 37PX70,diagonal size 37".
thanks for view and coment.
macolest 3 years ago
Were any other scalers used, except that in the panel?
Vladislaw81 3 years ago
No scalers are used, Betamax is directly connected to Plasma TV via BNC to RCA video out
macolest 3 years ago
Well, I tell you, this is something... But how it could be? With only 280 lines.
Vladislaw81 3 years ago
"TV lines" (analog video) are commonly mistaken to be a "pixel" measurement in the digital sense, but actually refer the level of horizontal resolution in one line. Each individual line is a continuous signal, with the amount of detail limited by the available video bandwidth. The vertical resolution of any standard analog video system is always 480 or 576 lines. The analog signal off tape is digitally sampled by the plasma TV's display processor (likely at 720x576) and scaled-up for display.
pdmillar 3 years ago 2
not all analog sets use 480i lines
some of them are lower such as VHS wich is 250 lines.
kawaiifreak860 2 years ago
That's exactly the common misconception I was trying to clear up. "250 lines" refers to the number of distinct vertical lines that can be resolved on a test chart (so it is something like a horizontal measurement) but the number of scanlines containing picture information is always around 480/576 (525/625 including the blanking interval and sync.) To look at it another way, the signal you get back from a VHS tape is "blurred" horizontally a bit compared to the original.
pdmillar 2 years ago 2
@kawaiifreak860 VHS is 250 TVL. It is still 483i. So is S-VHS and Beta.
jjovereats 5 months ago
@jjovereats
>250TVL = 483i
NOPE
250 TVL = roughly 250 horizontal lines = less 250lines total thus NO it is not 483 lines.
kawaiifreak860 5 months ago
@kawaiifreak860 250 HORIZONTAL lines. That's TVL. The vertical lines are to the dimensions of 483, 241.5 per field, 50 fields per second. It can be down to 220TVL, but it's still 483i (or where I am (or was depending on when you read this) 576i).
483 lines would be insane resolution. 220 lines is 333x483i or 333x576i, and 420 lines (Hi8) is 560x483i or 560x576i.
So what you are saying is damningly wrong.
jjovereats 5 months ago
This is something!..
Roetheperfect, I could not reach your link, please, write it again carefully. It may be interesting.
Vladislaw81 3 years ago
Just dele the blankspaces in the link
macolest 2 years ago
El Beta max tiene la misma calidad de video y sonido del DVD
flickr. com/photos/9108397@N03/1008322676/
Roetheperfect 3 years ago