Added: 2 years ago
From: danceonfilm
Views: 95,283
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (61)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This brings back so many happy thoughts, being in dance school watching this for the first time.

  • I just love how the 4 women are "a group" but they're also individualized. The way it plays in and out of this is so marvelous.

  • This is one of the most beautifully photographed of all dance films. The wonderful Noguchi set, so beautifully lit.... the editing and camera angles so meaningfully conceived, fully understanding the choreography, yet not just a static "fishbowl" view as is so often done for archival purposes. And the original 13-instrument version of the music IS so much more in character with the simple modest character of the piece. Wonderful all around.

  • This literally brought a tear to my eye.

  • Fantastic and amazing. The set is identical to the version filmed in 1944. But complete and clear. According to the IMDB, Martha Graham was born in 1894, which would have made her 64 at the time of this performance. Portraying a woman in her late teens or early twenties. Superb. An American ballet if there ever was.

  • Thank you! Speechless!

  • It is so wonderful that we can see Martha dance her own choreography -- to actually see her vision, not someone elses' interpretation more than 50 years after she performed it. Thank you, thank you, thank you for bringing us this gift.

  • I saw this once many years ago and I thought it was just great. Today I found it here and was just blown away with it. True, I admit I'm not cultured enough to understand everyrthing in the dance but, I just loved the misic, the movements and the dancers themselves. This, in my mind, is an absolutely brilliant piece of work and i will enjoy it over and over again for some time to come. The preacher did a great job and was my favorite.

    Thank you for bringing this to me!

  • thumbs up if google DIDN'T bring you here...copland and graham are visionarys

  • I believe both Kate Bush and David Bowie studied dance with Martha Graham(I think so anyway). When I watch "Running up that Hill", I can see Martha's style in Kate's movement.

  • brilliant

  • I don't get it, probably for lack of culture, but I don't understand this art form. All I see is people twirling and hopping about. I'm not trying to insult the piece, on the contrary I would be very grateful if somebody enlightened me.

  • @SuzyCheeseSteak You don't have to 'get' anything if you don't want to. If you just find the music, movement or story beautiful that's fine enough...or, even if you don't think it's beautiful, as long as it makes you 'feel' something, it's accomplished its goal. That's the great thing about it. :-)

    Most people appreciate Martha's work because of the context - she is to dance what Picasso was to painting or sculpture. She broke many, many 'rules' and re-defined what people think of as movement.

  • @SuzyCheeseSteak Congratulations on your bold wondering! josjuajeffery above gives a good answer. About the only thing you need to start to appreciate it is have a sense of, "This is cool, I want to get it!"... Ask yourself the question, if I wanted to show feelings, joy, trepidation, etc., about marriage and relationship but all I could do is have people move around on a stage, how would I have them move to convey those feelings and meanings to the audience...Ms. Graham gives one answer...

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • i performed this piece in china =) it's really pretty and its really gratifying and mesmerizing to perform it

  • Those poor girls are sitting against that wall!!

  • Yes! Google brought me here. I was reminiscing when I took a master class with Takako Asakawa at the New York studio, and saw an 80 something Martha Graham emerge from her office. Dignified, unsmiling, but very attentive watching us. Will never forget that. An incredible woman and American icon.

  • but she doesn't dance too much...

  • One of the reasons I love Aaron Copland...plus Martha is beyond amazing.

  • I love @6:17 she just stops right on time.

  • Thumbs up if google brought you here... :)

  • Her work is so beautiful...so passionately expressive; what an artist! Kudos to her entire company as it continues to perform today. Google did bring me here. Thank you for posting; I'll make sure to share this!

  • @yusefendure Bless you friend, with all my heart I mean that... much love to you and all of those that you know, friends, family, enemies and strangers you meet, may your light shine bright as you walk in love, always and .. forever.

  • wonderful´and stunning...

  • i get chills every time i watch this Martha Graham is a genius

  • Commonwealth of the arts

  • Commonwealth of the ARTS!

  • Copland = amazing composer, one of his best pieces.

    Graham = Amazing dancer, equally a good work.

    The two together = legendary

  • Thanks for the fascinating video....

    Nice work!

  • this is a work of enduring beauty and depth, with such control and quiet energy... what a find!

  • I think that this would be even more remarkable if it was filmed in color in an outside location

  • @xavtron I couldn't disagree more (although I'm really not trying to put you down for your comment). I love the simplicity of the piece which mirrors the Shaker theme throughout. Technicolor was around during the time this was filmed, so I can only imagine that it was down in black and white deliberately. The cinematography is excellent, with vivid contrast and a beautiful starkness.

  • @karinablacktie Actually, it's in black and white because this was originally shown on television in 1958 - at a time when very few people had color television sets. (Color televisions weren't really in wide use until the mid-late 60s.)

  • @rebecca8273 Point taken. I still like it in black and white, but I tend to like black and white photography also, especially when it's done with good contrast like this production. I hadn't realized this was shown on tv in 1958. Serves me right for not looking at more of the description.

  • Martha Graham one of a kind. She will live forever.

  • Martha lives on 4 ever... she loved me!

  • Spare and elegant.

  • Graham was just 50 when the ballet premiered.

  • The beauty of the music and the dance. It's pure joy 

  • Maravilloso

  • I hate life, but when I watch this I feel good again

  • @woof3x My God why don't you leave this guy alone. You are obviously quite disturbed, All he said was he felt good after watching this video. If you'll check 4 other people gave him thumbs up for his comment. I don't want to hurt your feelings but he may be right by suggesting to go fuck yourself.

  • One of America's greatest choreographers and one of America's greatest composers. How wonderful that they often worked together.

  • How wonderful to see the whole of it with Graham herself who must have been 60 at least. A monumental work of american art. thankyou

  • @Khymy she wasn't 60 in 1944. she was much younger.

  • @19arcadia This isn't the 1944 premiere, It's a 1959 performance. Graham was born in 1894. Do the math :-) It's more inspiring to watch, knowing she's in her mid-sixties.

  • @Khymy I looked it up and she was apparently 65!!

  • The action is too much often broken.

  • @tommyrall3

    Fascinating observation. Many people disliked Graham (and still do) for the jerkiness of her choreography--but if you watch this all, you can see that there is still so much ballet in what she does.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more