Maybe the sides and the rear are snake-like, but the front, the front! Personally, I absolutely abhor that car's face, because of one stupid styling blunder.
The Dodge Viper is how a 'snake' front would look like.
Had Mitsuoka restyled that fish-lip grille (and perhaps the four eyes), it would look stunning and definitely worthy of the name.
I guarantee you this guy lives in the US. Only in the states will you say stuff like that.
NEWSFLASH = a jet engine is not the only recipe for a supercar. Look at what the Americans can do with a 8.0L V10 -- (in the viper) ..they produce just 600 hp. The Japanese produce 500 from a 3.6 V6. That's proper engeering.
and make no torque doing so. There are several engineering reasons to use a larger displacement motor, but let's not get into that because frankly I think you won't care.
yes ofcourse they would be benefits of a huge displacement.. but what I meant to say was that using a absurdly large motor is the easy way to design a fast car. i'd rather have a car that has a smaller engine but can produce the same power. Smaller engines are lighter and more efficient. When American supercars such as the corvette have leafspring suspension systems, how much respect would one want to give them?
-sigh- again with the usual 'lol leafspring' argument. Yes, the corvette uses them, but not in lieu of coilovers, rather they are transverse from left to right as an additional stability and structural integrity system, a very good (and lightweight) method for increasing cornering ability. As far as engine weight, most 4 cylinder engines with a similar output to an LS1 are ironblock and turbocharged, and often weigh more than the all aluminum LS series.
lol if your really going to argue for leafsprings.. what more can I say to you. Ferrari and porsche and just about any other supercar manufacturer put a lot of money in research and development. Theres a reason why they dont use leafsprings. Why do american cars use leafspring? Because they are cheap and cost effective. It's the same story with every american car.. all of the parts are from companies whose contracts were awarded to the lowest bidder, with no regard to quality.
The ZR1 nurburgring times say all that need to be said about how effective leaf springs are. What you've essentially just said is 'I know there's a cheap and effective solution to going fast around corners, but damn it all, it's 'old' and not new and shiny and I want to spend more money to do it!'
Where did Ferrari (599) and Audi (R8) get their magnetic ride damping system from? Oh, that's right, GM and their leafsprung Corvette.
The only reason why Japanese and European car companies do not build large displacement motors like the americans is that in some cases they are taxed by displacement of a car (which makes no sense as it is in no way correlated to fuel efficiency.) Often times, a 300 horsepower 2L engine is far less efficient than a 300 horsepower 5.7L. As you said, it costs less to make, and can be just as efficient while still retaining a torque advantage- So what if it's the easy way out?
It's NOT supercar, it's Fashioncar.
hiroyukinisimura 1 month ago
i think this wud be the perfect supercar if the 3.3 litre V6 was replaced with a turbo 4.8 litre V8 XD....nd if the front grill was redesigned
shihab94 1 year ago
He is just like VAZ 2101 :DDD
sanv12 1 year ago
This has to be the ugliest piece of shit I have
ever seen in my life. Not thee 'ugliest', but the ugliest
'Super Car' easily. I'ts like a 'butta-face',
She's got a hot body, 'but her face [butta-face] '....
gpx44 1 year ago
which is its top speed?
subzero92MK 1 year ago
fucking ugly. not gonna kid. doesnt matter how crazy its internals are. i wouldn't drive it even if i had the money.
apatheticE5 2 years ago
what th FUCK is that?
chinchinga222 2 years ago
the back is good the side is ok but the front is terrible
Reparo96 2 years ago
how come they said looks like fish..? the name and the design already stated its a Snake.. (Orochi)
Urzu3 2 years ago
Urzu3:
because it looks damn more like a stupid fish than a snake, that's why.
nightvisiongoggles1 2 years ago
owh.. maybe its their perspective.. for me, it look like a snake...
Urzu3 2 years ago
@Urzu3
Maybe the sides and the rear are snake-like, but the front, the front! Personally, I absolutely abhor that car's face, because of one stupid styling blunder.
The Dodge Viper is how a 'snake' front would look like.
Had Mitsuoka restyled that fish-lip grille (and perhaps the four eyes), it would look stunning and definitely worthy of the name.
nightvisiongoggles1 2 years ago 2
never heard of a v6 supercar..
sprisneo 2 years ago
jag xj220 has v6
sanchezfedorov 2 years ago
have you heard of a gtr r35?
a lotus?
then you have...
poplockkorea 2 years ago
@sprisneo i think the GTR is a twinturbo v6, but i could be wrong.
apatheticE5 2 years ago
I guarantee you this guy lives in the US. Only in the states will you say stuff like that.
NEWSFLASH = a jet engine is not the only recipe for a supercar. Look at what the Americans can do with a 8.0L V10 -- (in the viper) ..they produce just 600 hp. The Japanese produce 500 from a 3.6 V6. That's proper engeering.
vinehanger 2 years ago
@vinehanger
and make no torque doing so. There are several engineering reasons to use a larger displacement motor, but let's not get into that because frankly I think you won't care.
Sephirius 1 year ago
@Sephirius
yes ofcourse they would be benefits of a huge displacement.. but what I meant to say was that using a absurdly large motor is the easy way to design a fast car. i'd rather have a car that has a smaller engine but can produce the same power. Smaller engines are lighter and more efficient. When American supercars such as the corvette have leafspring suspension systems, how much respect would one want to give them?
vinehanger 1 year ago
@vinehanger
-sigh- again with the usual 'lol leafspring' argument. Yes, the corvette uses them, but not in lieu of coilovers, rather they are transverse from left to right as an additional stability and structural integrity system, a very good (and lightweight) method for increasing cornering ability. As far as engine weight, most 4 cylinder engines with a similar output to an LS1 are ironblock and turbocharged, and often weigh more than the all aluminum LS series.
Sephirius 1 year ago
@Sephirius
lol if your really going to argue for leafsprings.. what more can I say to you. Ferrari and porsche and just about any other supercar manufacturer put a lot of money in research and development. Theres a reason why they dont use leafsprings. Why do american cars use leafspring? Because they are cheap and cost effective. It's the same story with every american car.. all of the parts are from companies whose contracts were awarded to the lowest bidder, with no regard to quality.
vinehanger 1 year ago
@vinehanger
The ZR1 nurburgring times say all that need to be said about how effective leaf springs are. What you've essentially just said is 'I know there's a cheap and effective solution to going fast around corners, but damn it all, it's 'old' and not new and shiny and I want to spend more money to do it!'
Where did Ferrari (599) and Audi (R8) get their magnetic ride damping system from? Oh, that's right, GM and their leafsprung Corvette.
Sephirius 1 year ago
@vinehanger
The only reason why Japanese and European car companies do not build large displacement motors like the americans is that in some cases they are taxed by displacement of a car (which makes no sense as it is in no way correlated to fuel efficiency.) Often times, a 300 horsepower 2L engine is far less efficient than a 300 horsepower 5.7L. As you said, it costs less to make, and can be just as efficient while still retaining a torque advantage- So what if it's the easy way out?
Sephirius 1 year ago
I'll take one in purple.
phoenixhielo 2 years ago
this is the only japanese car i like but it looks like it still has a way to go before it can catch up with american or european cars but idk
haloslayer78965 2 years ago