It's so funny, how people can be sooooo stupid. Do still think that Oswald killed Kennedy?Don't u see that was the only way to let them off the leas? After that they can move the forces to Afgan, Iraq, Libia. Don't u see, they do not serve any country, but money and power. Fcuk, people will understand only when it's too late.
@ChristianHolloway7 this video isnt intended to prove the video was fake. Videos are real, but the "planes" were not airline planes, were forged planes to look like airline planes.
Didn't you notice that the vortex happens ONLY BEHIND the plane, where the air is exhausted? ( take a look at all the examples in your own video...! )
--> So, on 911 the fire and the smoke were never behind the planes, that's why there is no vortex happening.
and then please delete this video, because those kind of mistakes only discredit the thruth mouvement.
Of course there were no planes used in the false flag attack on the U.S. by the criminals in the Military-Congressional Industrial Complex... but it is hard for most of the sheeple to comprehend this.... (if it was on tv, it must be real.... right?)
Hopefully one day soon the truth will finally come out... :)
For those people who still think about the conspiracy is just a stupid theory; look for illuminati card game released in 1982 and the second version 1990s
Whoever made this video is confused. You are both absolutely correct and absolutely wrong. The VORTICES AREN'T COMING FROM ENGINES BUT WING-TIPS. Second, you are correct to say that vortices should be present in these videos but aren't.
Very simple vortex is created by the aircraft flying through the air and dragging the air behind it. Hitting a stationary object will not create a vortex because the plane has stopped moving, then the smoke and debris explodes from the building after the aircraft comes to a halt, hence no vortex!! Did your brain stop functioning during your hysteria?
Vortices occur IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE WINGS... i will not resort to the cursing and baby antics of plane huggers but i will say this... THE '540mph plane' HAS NO VORTEX BEHIND IT BECAUSE IT'S A CARTOON OF A PLANE HITTING A BUILDING. I kind of feel sorry for most of the people living in my country... i don't think more then a few percent will ever have the maturity or dedication to the truth to ever be able to admit to themselves they were duped for so long... God help us.
And in this video, supposedly showing Flight 11 hitting WTC 1, had Flight 11 been a real airliner, loaded with fuel for a cross country trip,, the explosion would have been BLACK because of the burning fuel, NOT brown and grey as the video shows.
You couldn't be more wrong Skippy. No commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
FACT: A 767 cannot fly 500mph at 800ft because of air density and structural integrity.
FACT: Had UA 175 been a real airliner, loaded with fuel for a cross country trip, upon IMPACTING WTC 2, there would have been a CRASH & EXPLOSION on the OUTSIDE of the tower.
FACT: Planes CRASH into buildings, they don't fly THROUGH them.
1: a 767 can fly a 500 mph at 800 feet, though it is extremely dangerous due to the high speed ready to break up the plane at any point.
2:Planes do go into buildings. These aircraft worked like a type of missile, entering the target before exploding. But even before 9/11, a B-25 crashed into the Empire State Building and eyewitnesses reported seeing it enter part of the building before it exploded, and if they don't check out, look at the hole.
No, a 767 cannot fly 500mph at 800ft. Air density and aircraft structure prevent those speeds at controlled flight.
A commercial airliner is a hollow, aluminum tube, which isn't like a missile at all, which proves to me you've never worked on aircraft.
The B-25 did crash into the Empire State building and the entire tail section was hanging out the side of the building with a great deal of plane debris in the street below.
@lmfecher Okay, the B-25 was a bad example because of its low speed flight, BUT a commercial airliner isn't hollow. They are filled with seats, luggage and people, along with all the electronics and galley stuff. Also, 767s can go pretty damn fast, one almost made 450 before the engine was at full throtle. AND! a terrorist isn't trying to control the flight, so if that thing about 450 isn't true like I thought, then look at the facts. Terrorists cause TERROR. It's in their names.
A commercial airliner IS hollow, Skippy. It is a hollow, aluminum tube that happens to have seats, electronics, bathrooms, galley areas etc.
And commercial airliners are designed to take off from point A, reach cruising altitude and then land at point B. They are NOT designed for low altitude high speed or high G maneuvers. Even a bird strike can be disasterous.
If UA 175 was a real airliner, what happened to all those seats, the luggage, and galley stuff?
A 767 cannot fly 500mph at 800ft because of air density and structural integrity. Had UA 175 been a real airliner, loaded with fuel for a cross country trip, there would have been a crash and subsequent explosion the moment it IMPACTED the outer steel framed wall of WTC 2. Instead, the videos all show UA 175 flying THROUGH tower 2 without CRASHING INTO IT FIRST.
Show me ONE video of UA 175 crashing into and exploding on the OUTSIDE wall of WTC 2.
@lmfecher Actually jet fuel is NOT explosive unless compressed and vaporized. If an airliner had struck the towers we would have seen a river of flaming liquid pouring down. The release of energy from the 'impact explosions' was far too rapid to be jet fuel.
@lmfecher - good comments - but from analysis of the film footage available flight 175 hits the tower at approx. 625mph - impossible x 2...perhaps you could undertake the same calculations I did to verify that because the 500mph claim (although damming in itself) is damage limitation propoganda. I have to say, the evidence suggests 757's and 767's did not hit the towers on 9/11 which is very perplexing indeed.
The video evidence of UA 175 clearly shows the ENTIRE airliner passing through the outer steel framed wall of WTC 2 without first CRASHING AGAINST it. A REAL 767 loaded with fuel would have crashed and EXPLODED upon IMPACT. But in ALL of the videos of UA 175, the explosion does not occur until the ENTIRE airliner is INSIDE WTC 2.
This defies Newtonian mechanics and basic crash physics. Therefore, I conclude that NO planes hit the towers.
@lmfecher My name is not Skippy. That aside, it is irrelevant if there even exist a video of UA175. You claim that of which videos do exist the contents defies physics. I merely ask if you have verified this extraordinary claim ... well ... at an actual physics department.
Well, have you? If not, why not?
Until confirmation you are just announcing your private opinion. noted. It means nothing to me until your private opinion is actually confirmed by an accredited physics department.
Irrelevant? heheheh, ok!! If the story of hijacked planes flying into buildings is true, then you should have no problem showing me ONE video of UA 175 crashing AGAINST the outer steel framed wall of WTC 2.
I merely ask if you have verified your extraordinary claim at an actual physics department.
If not, why not?
Until confirmation of your claim you are only announcing your private opinion. noted. It means nothing to me until your private opinion is actually confirmed by an accredited physics department.
Newtonian mechanics and basic crash physics were ignored on 9/11. I'm still waiting for you to show me one video, JUST ONE, of UA 175 crashing AGAINST the outer steel framed wall of WTC 2.
@lmfecher Changing the subject? Sorry, I don't fall for that. You claimed that a video showed that no airplane could have caused the effects you saw. Now you ask me for a completely different video. Sorry, won't do. So here we go again:
have you verified your extraordinary claim at an actual physics department?
If not, why not?
Your private opinion means nothing to me until your private opinion is actually confirmed by an accredited physics department. Please do so!
@lmfecher Wow! Really? And this is of course confirmed by Boeing or any other accredited subject matter knowledgeable scientific institution or organization. O, wait, it is not! It is jusst your personal unsubstantiated opinion. Oh, well, moving on...
I took the time to get the "victims" names from the 9/11 passenger lists. I then checked those names against the Social Security Death Index and guess what Skippy, MOST of the "victims" names DO NOT show up as dying on 9/11. We were told that 3,000 people died that day, but I've only found about 300 actual deaths. Why do you suppose that is?
In order for the NO PLANE theory to have any validity there must exist EVIDENCE such as a video that shows an explosion WITHOUT a plane hitting it. Have you ever seen such EVIDENCE? Does it even EXIST? NO. NO. NO. The entire NO PLANE theory is unsubstantiated and was created to ridicule and divide the truth movement. PLANES HIT the towers, but not the passengers airlines, instead remote controlled replacements that were specially prepared to penetrate hit the towers.
@felicity5155 I was reading your comment and I almost thought you were sane. The last sentence royally fucked that up though. Keep taking your medication.
@moomoo1337 - Well dumb fuck, the world knows already that you zionists and zionist loyalists were behind 9/11. The only people who don't know are the ignorant sheep and they don't want to know. So go ahead and preach to the sheep and keep them culled. You are wasting your time. The smart people have already left the sinking ship and don't care what happens next. Study Stalin and what he did with his own loyalists. After they are done with you low level shills they will piss you away.
@felicity5155 I am not a Zionist, I have no opinion either way about the Jewish people. You are just trying to put words into other people's mouths because you have nothing interesting to say. Stop being such an asshole and try not to believe everything that you see on the internet. Stop being such a racist as well, might make it easier for people to believe you in future.
@felicity5155 - Wow! - did you see the guy working the remote?...look, no vortex is pretty good evidence - if something is missing that should certainly be there then thats fairy good proof isn't it? - if you tell people you lost an eye in an almost fantastical accident, you better be sure you don't have two perfectly good eyes, cos they ain't going to believe one word of it! - when someone is murdered by a knife, you bet the detectives need that knife! - missing evidence is evidence!
Show me 1 video either amateur or professional that shows an explosion and cartoon cutout of a plane magically appearing WITHOUT a plane hitting it. Many cameras were focused on the towers after the first strike. Certainly there would be at least 1 video out there that proves no planes hit the towers... BUT NO VIDEO EXISTS. Use your heads people. No planers are govt DIS-INFO PSYOP.
if the planes they said hit the towers were real, show us a picture, not any, a clear one, all the people watching in NYC with cameras and videos and not one, including tv cameras too.
I think anyone with half a brain knows better than to think that these stupid "no plane" videos speak for the 9/11 Truth Movement. Nobody actually believes that. It's an argument that was made up to discredit the movement.
@Adarascarlet you are so full of shit dumb ass,,,,,,the plane hoax is the most important ,,,,,,,,,because it was the first lie,,,,,,,,in a massive web of lies that we were force fed that day,,,,,,,,who do you work for,,,,,,,,because you seem like a schill to me!
@bigbopper993 I stand corrected. I guess some people really do believe there were no planes. Well, let me be the first to tell you that this is a load of crap, and if you believe it, you're just helping the government. The Pentagon wasn't hit by a plane, and the buildings sure as Hell didn't collapse from fire, but they were hit by planes.
@Adarascarlet hey moron,,,everything that day was a lie,,,and the first most important lie of all was the plane fraud,,,aluminum contacting steel,,with no dispersion of energy,,,no crumpling,,,no breaking,,no instantaneous explosions from fragile wings filled with jet fuel,,,the wing would break,,leak fuel,,,aluminum plus steel creates a spark,,,and kaboom instantly,,,in the south tower i watch a plane slide right through and no firey explosion right away? only uneducated can think it's real!
@Adarascarlet how could you possibly believe any of the story when you know that the pentagon was not hit by a plane!,,,,,and the buildings were demolished,,,,,and there was no plane in shanksville,,,why are you holding onto the planes in new york,,,,a real 767 would never slide right through a steel tower like that,,,it's not possible,steel will win a fight against aluminum no matter how fast the aluminum is travelling,,no dispersion of energy along the vertical columns means no real crash!
@bigbopper993 You're missing a really key point here: We're on the same side. 9/11 was an inside job. Our government needs to be held accountable. The buildings were demolished. We both know this. If this is how you talk to people on your own side, I'd hate to see how you talk to people who believe the official story. Didn't you ever take a debate class in college? Nobody is going to listen to what you say if you insult them first. You lost me at "hey moron."
@Adarascarlet excuse me kind sir,,,,,i am sorry to have hurt your precious little feelings,,,,,but i don't have the time for sensitivity training here,,,i'm not going to get on my knees and beg and pray for people not to be morons,,,,and to get things straight,,,anyone,,,you,,,or,,anyone else who can possibly watch those supposed airliners slide right through a steel mesh wall,,and not break,, slow down,, and explode immediately,,anyone who can watch that and believe it is legit are MORONS!
@bigbopper993 You dick head... Left school early did we....
I'll dumb it down for you.... Snow is frozen water right?? so if you throw snow balls at a house all day will it break down the wall ?? No. Yet an avalanche of snow can flatten a whole village... Its known as energy equals mass you fuckwit. Same as a soft lead bullet passing thru almost anything as it velocity gives it a higher mass.. God i love it when i find dumb cunts like you who think they are clever yet have not a fucking clue.
@Adirtybird that shows how fucking dumb you are ,,,,,,,,,you go from a snow ball to an avalanche??,,,hey fuck head,,,,,if you wanna compare it to 9/11 you go from throwing a snowball to firing it at 500 mph,,,,either way the snowball will not seemlessly pass through steel and neither will aluminum,,,,,your analogy would be like going from one plane to 100 000 planes hitting the tower,,,,,and even 100 000 planes will still leave more than have of their debris on the impact wall,,,u know this!
@Adirtybird ok you teach me then fuckstick,,,,,,,,teach how all the laws of physics were suspended that morning moron!,,,,,,,,,teach me,,,,,,,i'm listening,,,,,,,,teach me how cool kerosene fires can weaken steel,,,,,,,teach me why there was no resistance during the collapse,,,,,,teach me how steel gets obliterated by aluminum,,,,,,,teach me moron,,,,,speak into my good ear,,,,,,,were newtons laws never ever valid,,,,,,,,or just not valid on that day??
@bigbopper993 Im not denying that it was an inside job, ie controlled demo fire not hot enough and so on. But to say no planes or that they could not pass thru the sides of the buildings is plain stupid when they clearly did. Any further discussion of those 2 points makes you look like an idiot. And if you're claim had any weight A&E for 911 would be all over it. Being that they are engineers i think they know a bit more about than you..
@Adirtybird IF YOU HAD FAMILY MURDERED BY THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX THAT DAY,,,,,,,,,YOU WOULD SING A DIFFERENT TUNE AND BE ASKING A FEW MORE QUESTIONS ABOUT HOW TRUTHFUL THE GOVERNMENT WAS THAAT DAY,,,,,,,YOU ARE DISGRACEFUL TO BYE INTO THE OFFICIAL LIES!!
the air swirled because the plane was leaving the explosions in your clips however dumbass the 911 planes did not fly off did they they stuck in the wtc hence no swirled fumes . END OF
@thatsshit so the vortex is there, but u say it disapears when the plane hits the building. so first the volume of airs is rotating around 300 cyles a min and then comes to a complete stop and disapears? objects in motion will remain in motion untill a equal force is aplied. so the plane hitting the building made the plane stop. but not the enviromental air. the colum of air rotating behind the plane should catch up and create the vortex . theres your answer
@thatsshit Woa your right, But.. Don't the wings have to actually be there to make the vertices? well i mean, Those winds are stong.. But there's a building in the way
@thatsshit You don't need a physics degree to see that this video is total bullshit. The explosion & fire occurs after the plane is already gone. Therefore, there is no plane flying through the smoke & fire to create the vortex effect created when a jet engine flies through or above smoke.
Unbeilavable, the eloquence that can be found here. It's as if spouting irrelevant profanities will ease the little guinea's fear of the truth. It's as though the official story is a holy mantra to him, and every thing is fine, as long as he has plenty of perfume to hide the smells that issue from the gutters of his soul...G:
first of all you fucking piece of shit. I have seen the real video that you are posting and the plane was 10000 percent visible. This came from the fukin TV special with the brother film makers. I wish i could take everyone who posts this fukin dumb shit and punch them right in the fuckin mouth.
@Guinea54 you are pretty fuckin ignorant dummy,,,,,,aluminum cannot seemlessly slide through steel,,,,,,and if these were real planes,,,,,,,both towers explosions would be nearly identicle,,,,,,watch the first hit,,,,,,massive dust with fireball emerging three seconds later,,,,,,,,then watch the second hit,,,,,,no initial dust!!,,,,,fireball emerging right off the bat,,,,,,this means there were different weapons used on each tower,,,,,wake up idiot,,,,,,they lied to you moron!
@bigbopper993 I live in NYC, I have friends and co workers who have seen the fucking planes with their own eyes, u are so stupid that I iwsh i could punch you right in the fucking face.
@Guinea54 wrong again,,,,,,maybe they say something,,,,,,,,for a split second between skyscrapers,,,,,,,and just assumed t it was a plane,,,,,,,,or they saw the other plane that was in the sky and never touched the towers ,,,,,,but I assure you moron,,,,,,there were no real planes that hit the towers,,,,,there is more then enough evidence,,,,,,,like the total lack of crash physics,,,,,,did newtons laws suspend themselves that morning,,,,,,i think not,,,,the impacts look fake because they are!
@bigbopper993 lol I don't even know if you are serious. I pray not. For the idiots who believe this, you can't just be an idiot, U would have to be a very very special type of idiot. See this video you are posting on? It is a fraud. I fucking have this video recorded. IT IS CLEAR AS FUCKING DAY. The people who posted this video edited it to make it look blurry and suspicious.
Look at the 911 television archives and see that most first responders witnessed a small plane or a missile, with the exception of Shawn Murtagh, who says he saw a large airliner. I think that the fact that he was the vice president of finance for CNN should obviously disqualify him.
Hmm, no vortices at WTC 1 either. There isn't really much more to discuss, as the accumulated evidence shows, beyond a doubt, that the official story was fabricated. Investigation anyone?
So all the people on board those planes, including flight attendant betty ong who phoned flight control and described what happened onboard, they were all make believe?
I really do seek the truth in all things, I don't exist to be "right", my little buzzer went off just now saying "Youre getting a little ahead of yourself, make sure you are 100% sure before you start expecting others to be convinced", so I apologize bro, that was my bad.
That can't happen, even if for some reason blowback affected the vortices which we've seen that it doesn't, even with a heavy viscous liquid napalm base, there would be at least some turbulence interacting with the fireball. Look, I'm not betting the farm on this one, it's sonething I saw, it seems to make sense, there's really no point in me arguing it I guess I'm just trying to relay the way it seems to me, I'd like to see some replications of this effect.
The velocity of the churning air that wasn't affected would still have 100% power to create vortices in the immediate area, just feet from the building, even inches, then as it encountered the side of the building it would disperse accordingly. But look, all of the air that was churning at thousands of RPMs a couple seconds before the crash that is outside the building just stops and disappears?
I know what you're saying and it would seem to make sense, so much of this crap on 9/11 is on this weird border of looking like it makes perfect sense and seeming like it makes sense, but in reality it doesn't hold up. It's like they got perfectly lucky with almost everything. Take a standing fan, blow it at s wall 8 feet away, burn incense behind it, the smoke will go all the way to the wall and spread out but the air that hasn't reached the wall yet isn't affected....
More total nonsense. Two planes were hijacked by muslim extremists who flew them into the twin towers and KILLED thousands of innocent people. Two more were hijacked and killed all of those aboard as well crashing into the pentagon and the last one taken back over by those brave and selfless people who knew they were going to die, but tried to save others. So disrespectful for all those who lost their loved ones that day.
@stoneangelgirl r u sure those hijack was muslim? u was in the plane is it? even the whitehouse dosent have the answer... start thinking other people.. i dont think only iraq hate US... 80% country in the world anty US... so, think twice.. last time, the investigator got mension about russian spy~
so you are saying that the thousands of people who saw a plane hit the tower didnt actually see it hit they saw a plane get really close then magically cloak itself and fly away making everyone think that it hit the tower?
Once again all physics must stop for 9/11, how fucking hard is it to understand that even though they blew up, they had gone through that airspace seconds before?? They just jump from question to question, well how bout this, how bout that? How about dealing with what the video is presenting? Assholes
Lol, watching the pinheads argue over the stupidest shit. I get what you're saying, because the plane flew through the airspace where the smoke and fire were just seconds before, it doesn't matter that the engines stopped once they exploded, what matters is that air had to have been spun around at those high speeds. My god these debunkers are StOOpid.
Just because you cant see it with the naked eye that does not mean it isnt there. You can see the vortex in the comparison videos BECAUSE THERE IS FUCKING SMOKE. At the very least you need a shit load of humidity , there was a vortex you just couldnt see it. Can you see the wind if it doesnt pick up rain or dust or debri or smoke, no you cant but that doesnt mean it isnt there. The people who make these videos to sell tshirt , get donations and get their faces on tv are the scum of the earth!!
These are jet engines, not a propeller on a model plane. There should be tremendous chaos in the smoke, and there isn't. It behaves like the air completely non-turbulent up there.
@forestloves Ya it was a calm morning, just what is the point of your jibberish, Watch wtc 7 collapse, and tell me why there are no explosions or glass blowing out of the building when it falls
@ryn88220 My point is that there should be tremendous tumult in the air, causing very visible vortexes :D:D Otherwise, there could have been no jet engines!
@forestloves This video is claiming you should see it after the plane crashes! fuckin dumb! The plane has to fly through smoke and debri in the air to see it either that or there has to be a tremendous amount of humidity. Whatch "frys 747 low flyover" and tell me what do you see behind the jet engines?
listen all you dirtbags i was one of the fire men that was there there were plane parts all over the place before the second plane hit.. so i think i would freaking know it was a sad day for the whole country.....
ever thought that maybe they tunrd the jets off and glided into the building? aiming for a building when going full speed on jets is alittle hard. and so if it "wasnt a plane" what was it? a hologram? you dipshit. and what did the thousands of bistanders and LIVE newcameras see!? you are the fucking cunt of society. go jump into a cave
Oh and why no vortex...hey fuckstick...the plane slammed into a building at 300mph making the engines stop instantly...they DIDN'T fly by like in your examples you fuckin retard...actually retard is to nice, they even know the truth...idiot.
engines are made out of material that can't be destroyed but only in an metdown plant bro so no the didn't stop until the rest of the plane was destroyed.again airliner's engine's are made from the strongest metal in the world making them damn near undestroyable mate.but yes they would have stop once the fuel stoped flowing and even if they didn't,they would have shoot though the building out the otherside which is clearly not the case.but line charges were used on the buildings support system.
For those who think there were NO PLANES, its pretty simply to see you got NO BRAINS! Please kill yourselves as stupidity at this level really means your fuckin worthles...lol...no planes, bunch of fuckin jerkoffs
First. jet engines dont create vortices. It's caused by the differential pressure above and below the wings, and they are emitted from the wingtips.
Second. This is just my opinion, but I would imagine the blast from the building could have disrupted the vortice's and was simply too powerful to see them
explain how Mr.Jennings died a person who witnessed there being dead bodies and explosions? You are right it wasn't Conspiracy but it was a plan demo of the buildings to collect lots of money!
listing the names and opinions of the "demo experts", scientists, and engineers would not matter to you, no matter how much more qualified they are than you, you have your mind made up, no need to waste any time on that. i most certainly did not post that comment to you in order to start a debate with you or anyone else. that would be about as productive as arguing with a rock.
you and your friend
HaywuudJablomie must be twins...
anyways, you guys are hateful. you should try to fix that.
anyone who thinks "terrorist" attacked those towers is a fool. false flag operations read into it weve been doing it forever, not to mention other countries hitler WW2 false flag he burned the parlametn down said it was the Jews and invaded them with the support of the German people because they where lied to just like all you Americans!
He didn't say that -- he said Hitler didn't blame it on the Jews ... because he DIDN'T.
He blamed it on the Communists. Not a single Jew in the whole "plot."
If you did two minutes of actual research you'd know that the Nazis didn't set the fire -- it was one crazy Dutch commie. The Nazis just bullshitted the fire into being some phony Communist plot.
Even a Nazi court couldn't convict anyone except Van der Lubbe.
@FarmGirlJB - Two thumbs down just because you were trying to help educate a dipshit twoofer...
Don't you love how they have no problem ignoring the truth? It's always some convoluted garbage that you can tell they heard somewhere and are repeating without understanding in the first place.
My favorite are the no planer physics experts that work as fry cooks during the day.
actually im a cw4 (chief warrant officer 4 , for u civilians) an yes these planes can handle 500 mph its extending the recomended limits but its just like an elevator that says it only can handle 500 lbs , if u put 600 in it, is it really goin to break the answer is no because they're just operating guidlines, second these vortices are true but what isnt true is the fact that the actual plane blew up its not flying over a fire lol, it flew straight in the building stopping the plane
the reason i no this is because im a c130 pilot wich is a plane not a jet ,an in a dive it can exceed 500 mph im sure if a c130 can do it a jet can do it under full power but what do i no im just a chief warrant officer 4 meaning i am an expert in aircraft an piloting them , physics, we defy the laws of physics every day man. hell the trade centers were supposed to be able to with stand that but i guess they defyd physics when they fell down, am i rite?.
I belived that the "Official" stories was true for about 3years after 11/09/01 (as did most) but recently ther just seems to be twice as much evidence to prove the "truthers" to be correct. After extensive viewing of video clips, and listening to scientists and fire experts and building experts I have decided tht.....No planes were involved on Septerber 11th in New york, pentigon, or shanksville.
can i ask where all these people went an how a pilot could make his plane dissapear into a building but there were no planes involved rite lol, i no there were planes involved im a pilot an u cant make up three fake flights an even if they did make up three flights they cant erase planes landing somewhere thats always logged its impossible to fake tht, now im not saying it wasnt planned by the govt i have no idea but i will assure u there were three planes
no planes fired missles lol, that is tha dumbest thing ive ever heard the wreckage is in tha damn buildin that clapsed man im a cw4 in the army an im a c130 pilot, but what do i no im just a pilot
It's so funny, how people can be sooooo stupid. Do still think that Oswald killed Kennedy?Don't u see that was the only way to let them off the leas? After that they can move the forces to Afgan, Iraq, Libia. Don't u see, they do not serve any country, but money and power. Fcuk, people will understand only when it's too late.
backbeatych 2 months ago 2
Yeah every video was faked. ha ha dumb asses.
ChristianHolloway7 2 months ago
@ChristianHolloway7 this video isnt intended to prove the video was fake. Videos are real, but the "planes" were not airline planes, were forged planes to look like airline planes.
bestplugins 1 month ago
The nose out shot puts any planes in doubt. There would be no reason to fake video of planes if there were planes.
A hologram done badly may still be possible with drones projecting from the plume. But faked video is most reliable.
StratusBlue 4 months ago
Didn't you notice that the vortex happens ONLY BEHIND the plane, where the air is exhausted? ( take a look at all the examples in your own video...! )
--> So, on 911 the fire and the smoke were never behind the planes, that's why there is no vortex happening.
and then please delete this video, because those kind of mistakes only discredit the thruth mouvement.
anothersoundmission 4 months ago
Mark Bingham.
tgt305 4 months ago
@tgt305 Mark Bingham what?
wimahlers 3 months ago
What was the fate of the people that boarded the jets in Boston? Were they taken elsewhere and killed?
rovingdesertfox 5 months ago
brilliant work! really really good stuff.
anthonyc31 5 months ago in playlist More videos from thatsshit
Нет завихрений от двигателя, потому что самолёт летел с выключенными двигателями (планировал).
gkbasil 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gkbasil,
.
"Нет завихрений от двигателя, потому что самолёт летел с выключенными двигателями (планировал)."
.
No. The vortex is created by the plane. Cut off engines would not matter (that much).
Besides, commercial airliners are difficult to control with cut off engines.
wimahlers 3 months ago
Of course there were no planes used in the false flag attack on the U.S. by the criminals in the Military-Congressional Industrial Complex... but it is hard for most of the sheeple to comprehend this.... (if it was on tv, it must be real.... right?)
Hopefully one day soon the truth will finally come out... :)
jordonrains 5 months ago
For those people who still think about the conspiracy is just a stupid theory; look for illuminati card game released in 1982 and the second version 1990s
TheChosenPR 9 months ago
Whoever made this video is confused. You are both absolutely correct and absolutely wrong. The VORTICES AREN'T COMING FROM ENGINES BUT WING-TIPS. Second, you are correct to say that vortices should be present in these videos but aren't.
CohibaSkeeza 9 months ago
Google "China Syndrome at the WTC"
WTCnucleardemolition 9 months ago
Very simple vortex is created by the aircraft flying through the air and dragging the air behind it. Hitting a stationary object will not create a vortex because the plane has stopped moving, then the smoke and debris explodes from the building after the aircraft comes to a halt, hence no vortex!! Did your brain stop functioning during your hysteria?
fluidjazz 9 months ago
Vortices occur IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE WINGS... i will not resort to the cursing and baby antics of plane huggers but i will say this... THE '540mph plane' HAS NO VORTEX BEHIND IT BECAUSE IT'S A CARTOON OF A PLANE HITTING A BUILDING. I kind of feel sorry for most of the people living in my country... i don't think more then a few percent will ever have the maturity or dedication to the truth to ever be able to admit to themselves they were duped for so long... God help us.
SlavesAreDisarmed 10 months ago
i believe 911 was a conspiracy but i think that there was planes.us government better expose themselves
nb45001 10 months ago
It doesn't help your cause when you start the video when the plane is already in the
WTC.
BOKnows1450 10 months ago
Nico seems to be the biggest shill there is. He must have a lot of sockpuppets, and seems to be all about disinfo.
nebnubs 11 months ago
hey you dumb fuck your clip starts after the plane hit.
Calamazu57 11 months ago
And in this video, supposedly showing Flight 11 hitting WTC 1, had Flight 11 been a real airliner, loaded with fuel for a cross country trip,, the explosion would have been BLACK because of the burning fuel, NOT brown and grey as the video shows.
lmfecher 1 year ago
The plane is inside the tower so it can't create vortex's. P.S. Why didn't you start this video at the point the planes shadow was on the building?
smurfboywv 1 year ago
@smurfboywv
"The plane is inside the tower"....
You couldn't be more wrong Skippy. No commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.
FACT: A 767 cannot fly 500mph at 800ft because of air density and structural integrity.
FACT: Had UA 175 been a real airliner, loaded with fuel for a cross country trip, upon IMPACTING WTC 2, there would have been a CRASH & EXPLOSION on the OUTSIDE of the tower.
FACT: Planes CRASH into buildings, they don't fly THROUGH them.
lmfecher 1 year ago 12
@lmfecher Things wrong eith your facts
1: a 767 can fly a 500 mph at 800 feet, though it is extremely dangerous due to the high speed ready to break up the plane at any point.
2:Planes do go into buildings. These aircraft worked like a type of missile, entering the target before exploding. But even before 9/11, a B-25 crashed into the Empire State Building and eyewitnesses reported seeing it enter part of the building before it exploded, and if they don't check out, look at the hole.
bestshowontheweb 9 months ago
@bestshowontheweb
No, a 767 cannot fly 500mph at 800ft. Air density and aircraft structure prevent those speeds at controlled flight.
A commercial airliner is a hollow, aluminum tube, which isn't like a missile at all, which proves to me you've never worked on aircraft.
The B-25 did crash into the Empire State building and the entire tail section was hanging out the side of the building with a great deal of plane debris in the street below.
Show me ONE video of UA 175 CRASHNG into WTC 2.
lmfecher 9 months ago
@lmfecher Okay, the B-25 was a bad example because of its low speed flight, BUT a commercial airliner isn't hollow. They are filled with seats, luggage and people, along with all the electronics and galley stuff. Also, 767s can go pretty damn fast, one almost made 450 before the engine was at full throtle. AND! a terrorist isn't trying to control the flight, so if that thing about 450 isn't true like I thought, then look at the facts. Terrorists cause TERROR. It's in their names.
bestshowontheweb 9 months ago
@bestshowontheweb
A commercial airliner IS hollow, Skippy. It is a hollow, aluminum tube that happens to have seats, electronics, bathrooms, galley areas etc.
And commercial airliners are designed to take off from point A, reach cruising altitude and then land at point B. They are NOT designed for low altitude high speed or high G maneuvers. Even a bird strike can be disasterous.
If UA 175 was a real airliner, what happened to all those seats, the luggage, and galley stuff?
lmfecher 9 months ago
@bestshowontheweb
A 767 cannot fly 500mph at 800ft because of air density and structural integrity. Had UA 175 been a real airliner, loaded with fuel for a cross country trip, there would have been a crash and subsequent explosion the moment it IMPACTED the outer steel framed wall of WTC 2. Instead, the videos all show UA 175 flying THROUGH tower 2 without CRASHING INTO IT FIRST.
Show me ONE video of UA 175 crashing into and exploding on the OUTSIDE wall of WTC 2.
lmfecher 9 months ago
@lmfecher Actually jet fuel is NOT explosive unless compressed and vaporized. If an airliner had struck the towers we would have seen a river of flaming liquid pouring down. The release of energy from the 'impact explosions' was far too rapid to be jet fuel.
izzysykopth 7 months ago
@lmfecher - good comments - but from analysis of the film footage available flight 175 hits the tower at approx. 625mph - impossible x 2...perhaps you could undertake the same calculations I did to verify that because the 500mph claim (although damming in itself) is damage limitation propoganda. I have to say, the evidence suggests 757's and 767's did not hit the towers on 9/11 which is very perplexing indeed.
TREACLE97 5 months ago
@TREACLE97
The video evidence of UA 175 clearly shows the ENTIRE airliner passing through the outer steel framed wall of WTC 2 without first CRASHING AGAINST it. A REAL 767 loaded with fuel would have crashed and EXPLODED upon IMPACT. But in ALL of the videos of UA 175, the explosion does not occur until the ENTIRE airliner is INSIDE WTC 2.
This defies Newtonian mechanics and basic crash physics. Therefore, I conclude that NO planes hit the towers.
I'm happy to see you're awake, too!
lmfecher 5 months ago
@lmfecher Two word: Inertia and momentum. I suggest you contact a physics department first before you discuss physics.
wimahlers 3 months ago
@wimahlers
Two words....impact and crash. Show me ONE video of UA 175 crashing or impacting AGAINST the outer steel framed wall of WTC 2.
Go back to sleep, Skippy.
lmfecher 3 months ago
@lmfecher My name is not Skippy. That aside, it is irrelevant if there even exist a video of UA175. You claim that of which videos do exist the contents defies physics. I merely ask if you have verified this extraordinary claim ... well ... at an actual physics department.
Well, have you? If not, why not?
Until confirmation you are just announcing your private opinion. noted. It means nothing to me until your private opinion is actually confirmed by an accredited physics department.
wimahlers 3 months ago
@wimahlers
Irrelevant? heheheh, ok!! If the story of hijacked planes flying into buildings is true, then you should have no problem showing me ONE video of UA 175 crashing AGAINST the outer steel framed wall of WTC 2.
Find me that video, Skippy.
lmfecher 3 months ago
@lmfecher Gain, and I repeat:
I merely ask if you have verified your extraordinary claim at an actual physics department.
If not, why not?
Until confirmation of your claim you are only announcing your private opinion. noted. It means nothing to me until your private opinion is actually confirmed by an accredited physics department.
wimahlers 3 months ago
@wimahlers
Newtonian mechanics and basic crash physics were ignored on 9/11. I'm still waiting for you to show me one video, JUST ONE, of UA 175 crashing AGAINST the outer steel framed wall of WTC 2.
lmfecher 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lmfecher Changing the subject? Sorry, I don't fall for that. You claimed that a video showed that no airplane could have caused the effects you saw. Now you ask me for a completely different video. Sorry, won't do. So here we go again:
have you verified your extraordinary claim at an actual physics department?
If not, why not?
Your private opinion means nothing to me until your private opinion is actually confirmed by an accredited physics department. Please do so!
wimahlers 3 months ago
@lmfecher Wow! Really? And this is of course confirmed by Boeing or any other accredited subject matter knowledgeable scientific institution or organization. O, wait, it is not! It is jusst your personal unsubstantiated opinion. Oh, well, moving on...
wimahlers 3 months ago
@lmfecher Yeah ok. So then did the government kill all the people missing from the planes that day? Take your meds
bluesscore 3 months ago
@bluesscore
"all the people"????
I took the time to get the "victims" names from the 9/11 passenger lists. I then checked those names against the Social Security Death Index and guess what Skippy, MOST of the "victims" names DO NOT show up as dying on 9/11. We were told that 3,000 people died that day, but I've only found about 300 actual deaths. Why do you suppose that is?
9/11 was a media scam, that's why!
lmfecher 3 months ago
i've thougth about it. i just wasted three minutes of my life looking at this dumb shit.
smoot0420 1 year ago
this is a spam video to make 911 secretly stuped
meenojo 1 year ago
Fucking anoying music!
Espmell 1 year ago
Q. How do you get two 9/11 truthers to speak in tune?
A. Shoot one of them
TheFACTSRUS 1 year ago
In order for the NO PLANE theory to have any validity there must exist EVIDENCE such as a video that shows an explosion WITHOUT a plane hitting it. Have you ever seen such EVIDENCE? Does it even EXIST? NO. NO. NO. The entire NO PLANE theory is unsubstantiated and was created to ridicule and divide the truth movement. PLANES HIT the towers, but not the passengers airlines, instead remote controlled replacements that were specially prepared to penetrate hit the towers.
felicity5155 1 year ago
@felicity5155 I was reading your comment and I almost thought you were sane. The last sentence royally fucked that up though. Keep taking your medication.
moomoo1337 1 year ago
@moomoo1337 - Well dumb fuck, the world knows already that you zionists and zionist loyalists were behind 9/11. The only people who don't know are the ignorant sheep and they don't want to know. So go ahead and preach to the sheep and keep them culled. You are wasting your time. The smart people have already left the sinking ship and don't care what happens next. Study Stalin and what he did with his own loyalists. After they are done with you low level shills they will piss you away.
felicity5155 1 year ago
@felicity5155 I am not a Zionist, I have no opinion either way about the Jewish people. You are just trying to put words into other people's mouths because you have nothing interesting to say. Stop being such an asshole and try not to believe everything that you see on the internet. Stop being such a racist as well, might make it easier for people to believe you in future.
moomoo1337 1 year ago
@felicity5155 - Wow! - did you see the guy working the remote?...look, no vortex is pretty good evidence - if something is missing that should certainly be there then thats fairy good proof isn't it? - if you tell people you lost an eye in an almost fantastical accident, you better be sure you don't have two perfectly good eyes, cos they ain't going to believe one word of it! - when someone is murdered by a knife, you bet the detectives need that knife! - missing evidence is evidence!
TREACLE97 1 year ago
Show me 1 video either amateur or professional that shows an explosion and cartoon cutout of a plane magically appearing WITHOUT a plane hitting it. Many cameras were focused on the towers after the first strike. Certainly there would be at least 1 video out there that proves no planes hit the towers... BUT NO VIDEO EXISTS. Use your heads people. No planers are govt DIS-INFO PSYOP.
felicity5155 1 year ago
The absence of vortex is disturbing...
But we all know that a controlled demolition destroyed all 3 towers.
Thus, plane or no plane?
Remotely controlled planes or very skilled occasional pilots?
Not a central point to me.
Zzozze 1 year ago
Let's stop feeding the trolls, everyone.
Adarascarlet 1 year ago
if the planes they said hit the towers were real, show us a picture, not any, a clear one, all the people watching in NYC with cameras and videos and not one, including tv cameras too.
joiganja 1 year ago
I think anyone with half a brain knows better than to think that these stupid "no plane" videos speak for the 9/11 Truth Movement. Nobody actually believes that. It's an argument that was made up to discredit the movement.
Adarascarlet 1 year ago
@Adarascarlet you are so full of shit dumb ass,,,,,,the plane hoax is the most important ,,,,,,,,,because it was the first lie,,,,,,,,in a massive web of lies that we were force fed that day,,,,,,,,who do you work for,,,,,,,,because you seem like a schill to me!
bigbopper993 1 year ago
@bigbopper993 I stand corrected. I guess some people really do believe there were no planes. Well, let me be the first to tell you that this is a load of crap, and if you believe it, you're just helping the government. The Pentagon wasn't hit by a plane, and the buildings sure as Hell didn't collapse from fire, but they were hit by planes.
Adarascarlet 1 year ago
@Adarascarlet hey moron,,,everything that day was a lie,,,and the first most important lie of all was the plane fraud,,,aluminum contacting steel,,with no dispersion of energy,,,no crumpling,,,no breaking,,no instantaneous explosions from fragile wings filled with jet fuel,,,the wing would break,,leak fuel,,,aluminum plus steel creates a spark,,,and kaboom instantly,,,in the south tower i watch a plane slide right through and no firey explosion right away? only uneducated can think it's real!
bigbopper993 1 year ago
@Adarascarlet how could you possibly believe any of the story when you know that the pentagon was not hit by a plane!,,,,,and the buildings were demolished,,,,,and there was no plane in shanksville,,,why are you holding onto the planes in new york,,,,a real 767 would never slide right through a steel tower like that,,,it's not possible,steel will win a fight against aluminum no matter how fast the aluminum is travelling,,no dispersion of energy along the vertical columns means no real crash!
bigbopper993 1 year ago
@bigbopper993 You're missing a really key point here: We're on the same side. 9/11 was an inside job. Our government needs to be held accountable. The buildings were demolished. We both know this. If this is how you talk to people on your own side, I'd hate to see how you talk to people who believe the official story. Didn't you ever take a debate class in college? Nobody is going to listen to what you say if you insult them first. You lost me at "hey moron."
Adarascarlet 1 year ago
@Adarascarlet excuse me kind sir,,,,,i am sorry to have hurt your precious little feelings,,,,,but i don't have the time for sensitivity training here,,,i'm not going to get on my knees and beg and pray for people not to be morons,,,,and to get things straight,,,anyone,,,you,,,or,,anyone else who can possibly watch those supposed airliners slide right through a steel mesh wall,,and not break,, slow down,, and explode immediately,,anyone who can watch that and believe it is legit are MORONS!
bigbopper993 1 year ago
@bigbopper993 You dick head... Left school early did we....
I'll dumb it down for you.... Snow is frozen water right?? so if you throw snow balls at a house all day will it break down the wall ?? No. Yet an avalanche of snow can flatten a whole village... Its known as energy equals mass you fuckwit. Same as a soft lead bullet passing thru almost anything as it velocity gives it a higher mass.. God i love it when i find dumb cunts like you who think they are clever yet have not a fucking clue.
Adirtybird 1 year ago
@Adirtybird that shows how fucking dumb you are ,,,,,,,,,you go from a snow ball to an avalanche??,,,hey fuck head,,,,,if you wanna compare it to 9/11 you go from throwing a snowball to firing it at 500 mph,,,,either way the snowball will not seemlessly pass through steel and neither will aluminum,,,,,your analogy would be like going from one plane to 100 000 planes hitting the tower,,,,,and even 100 000 planes will still leave more than have of their debris on the impact wall,,,u know this!
bigbopper993 1 year ago
@bigbopper993 You're beyond stupid. You wont learn because you don't want to learn.
Adirtybird 1 year ago
@Adirtybird ok you teach me then fuckstick,,,,,,,,teach how all the laws of physics were suspended that morning moron!,,,,,,,,,teach me,,,,,,,i'm listening,,,,,,,,teach me how cool kerosene fires can weaken steel,,,,,,,teach me why there was no resistance during the collapse,,,,,,teach me how steel gets obliterated by aluminum,,,,,,,teach me moron,,,,,speak into my good ear,,,,,,,were newtons laws never ever valid,,,,,,,,or just not valid on that day??
bigbopper993 1 year ago
@bigbopper993 Im not denying that it was an inside job, ie controlled demo fire not hot enough and so on. But to say no planes or that they could not pass thru the sides of the buildings is plain stupid when they clearly did. Any further discussion of those 2 points makes you look like an idiot. And if you're claim had any weight A&E for 911 would be all over it. Being that they are engineers i think they know a bit more about than you..
Adirtybird 1 year ago
@Adirtybird IF YOU HAD FAMILY MURDERED BY THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX THAT DAY,,,,,,,,,YOU WOULD SING A DIFFERENT TUNE AND BE ASKING A FEW MORE QUESTIONS ABOUT HOW TRUTHFUL THE GOVERNMENT WAS THAAT DAY,,,,,,,YOU ARE DISGRACEFUL TO BYE INTO THE OFFICIAL LIES!!
bigbopper993 1 year ago
@Adirtybird a soft lead bullet isn't hollow as a plane is. it's just a remark.
Zzozze 1 year ago
the air swirled because the plane was leaving the explosions in your clips however dumbass the 911 planes did not fly off did they they stuck in the wtc hence no swirled fumes . END OF
Supernovaejh 1 year ago
@Supernovaejh
Wrong! The Vortices are Created on the Wingtip of a Plane. Therefor the Vortices
are created to the very point the Wings hit the Wall. If you think this wasnt the case, pls prove me wrong with Physics and not with your opinions!
greetings!
thatsshit 1 year ago 9
@thatsshit so the vortex is there, but u say it disapears when the plane hits the building. so first the volume of airs is rotating around 300 cyles a min and then comes to a complete stop and disapears? objects in motion will remain in motion untill a equal force is aplied. so the plane hitting the building made the plane stop. but not the enviromental air. the colum of air rotating behind the plane should catch up and create the vortex . theres your answer
dogsofwarclan 1 year ago
@thatsshit Woa your right, But.. Don't the wings have to actually be there to make the vertices? well i mean, Those winds are stong.. But there's a building in the way
wiggos666 1 year ago
@thatsshit Vorticies are created by the fans spinning in the engines, now who's the dumbass?
smurfboywv 1 year ago
@thatsshit You don't need a physics degree to see that this video is total bullshit. The explosion & fire occurs after the plane is already gone. Therefore, there is no plane flying through the smoke & fire to create the vortex effect created when a jet engine flies through or above smoke.
oooowwwwdddd 6 months ago
@oooowwwwdddd The vortexes last 10 minutes after a plane has passed. They don't vanish the instant a plane has gone by.
LucidDreamTricks 5 months ago
@LucidDreamTricks No you're wrong pee pee ca ca doo doo
oooowwwwdddd 5 months ago
Unbeilavable, the eloquence that can be found here. It's as if spouting irrelevant profanities will ease the little guinea's fear of the truth. It's as though the official story is a holy mantra to him, and every thing is fine, as long as he has plenty of perfume to hide the smells that issue from the gutters of his soul...G:
wordgeezer 1 year ago
first of all you fucking piece of shit. I have seen the real video that you are posting and the plane was 10000 percent visible. This came from the fukin TV special with the brother film makers. I wish i could take everyone who posts this fukin dumb shit and punch them right in the fuckin mouth.
Guinea54 1 year ago
@Guinea54 you are pretty fuckin ignorant dummy,,,,,,aluminum cannot seemlessly slide through steel,,,,,,and if these were real planes,,,,,,,both towers explosions would be nearly identicle,,,,,,watch the first hit,,,,,,massive dust with fireball emerging three seconds later,,,,,,,,then watch the second hit,,,,,,no initial dust!!,,,,,fireball emerging right off the bat,,,,,,this means there were different weapons used on each tower,,,,,wake up idiot,,,,,,they lied to you moron!
bigbopper993 1 year ago
@bigbopper993 I live in NYC, I have friends and co workers who have seen the fucking planes with their own eyes, u are so stupid that I iwsh i could punch you right in the fucking face.
Guinea54 1 year ago
@Guinea54 wrong again,,,,,,maybe they say something,,,,,,,,for a split second between skyscrapers,,,,,,,and just assumed t it was a plane,,,,,,,,or they saw the other plane that was in the sky and never touched the towers ,,,,,,but I assure you moron,,,,,,there were no real planes that hit the towers,,,,,there is more then enough evidence,,,,,,,like the total lack of crash physics,,,,,,did newtons laws suspend themselves that morning,,,,,,i think not,,,,the impacts look fake because they are!
bigbopper993 1 year ago
@bigbopper993 lol I don't even know if you are serious. I pray not. For the idiots who believe this, you can't just be an idiot, U would have to be a very very special type of idiot. See this video you are posting on? It is a fraud. I fucking have this video recorded. IT IS CLEAR AS FUCKING DAY. The people who posted this video edited it to make it look blurry and suspicious.
Guinea54 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This theory has no validity
eaglesforever18 1 year ago
@gregmorrow haha win
eaglesforever18 1 year ago
Look at the 911 television archives and see that most first responders witnessed a small plane or a missile, with the exception of Shawn Murtagh, who says he saw a large airliner. I think that the fact that he was the vice president of finance for CNN should obviously disqualify him.
Hmm, no vortices at WTC 1 either. There isn't really much more to discuss, as the accumulated evidence shows, beyond a doubt, that the official story was fabricated. Investigation anyone?
wordgeezer 1 year ago 4
@wordgeezer wow what a fukin moron
Guinea54 1 year ago
@wordgeezer Nobody saw anything and most said that the building just exploded cuz it did .
No airplanes , fake videos , anyone who denys it is ignorant or a shill . See John Lear and 911 video .
Those planes can't DO that but the CGI did not know it ....busted !
SAYYOURROSARY 1 year ago
So all the people on board those planes, including flight attendant betty ong who phoned flight control and described what happened onboard, they were all make believe?
The6thSimpson 1 year ago
@sfiorare
I really do seek the truth in all things, I don't exist to be "right", my little buzzer went off just now saying "Youre getting a little ahead of yourself, make sure you are 100% sure before you start expecting others to be convinced", so I apologize bro, that was my bad.
N1k1mon 1 year ago
@sfiorare
That can't happen, even if for some reason blowback affected the vortices which we've seen that it doesn't, even with a heavy viscous liquid napalm base, there would be at least some turbulence interacting with the fireball. Look, I'm not betting the farm on this one, it's sonething I saw, it seems to make sense, there's really no point in me arguing it I guess I'm just trying to relay the way it seems to me, I'd like to see some replications of this effect.
N1k1mon 1 year ago
@sfiorare
The velocity of the churning air that wasn't affected would still have 100% power to create vortices in the immediate area, just feet from the building, even inches, then as it encountered the side of the building it would disperse accordingly. But look, all of the air that was churning at thousands of RPMs a couple seconds before the crash that is outside the building just stops and disappears?
N1k1mon 1 year ago
@sfiorare
I know what you're saying and it would seem to make sense, so much of this crap on 9/11 is on this weird border of looking like it makes perfect sense and seeming like it makes sense, but in reality it doesn't hold up. It's like they got perfectly lucky with almost everything. Take a standing fan, blow it at s wall 8 feet away, burn incense behind it, the smoke will go all the way to the wall and spread out but the air that hasn't reached the wall yet isn't affected....
N1k1mon 1 year ago
More total nonsense. Two planes were hijacked by muslim extremists who flew them into the twin towers and KILLED thousands of innocent people. Two more were hijacked and killed all of those aboard as well crashing into the pentagon and the last one taken back over by those brave and selfless people who knew they were going to die, but tried to save others. So disrespectful for all those who lost their loved ones that day.
stoneangelgirl 1 year ago
@stoneangelgirl r u sure those hijack was muslim? u was in the plane is it? even the whitehouse dosent have the answer... start thinking other people.. i dont think only iraq hate US... 80% country in the world anty US... so, think twice.. last time, the investigator got mension about russian spy~
syamim98 1 year ago
so you are saying that the thousands of people who saw a plane hit the tower didnt actually see it hit they saw a plane get really close then magically cloak itself and fly away making everyone think that it hit the tower?
Recon801 1 year ago
@Recon801 dude it was harry potter and lee harvey oswald, they rode in on a dementor and shot a magic bullet.
lethaldeathgo 1 year ago
Once again all physics must stop for 9/11, how fucking hard is it to understand that even though they blew up, they had gone through that airspace seconds before?? They just jump from question to question, well how bout this, how bout that? How about dealing with what the video is presenting? Assholes
N1k1mon 1 year ago
Lol, watching the pinheads argue over the stupidest shit. I get what you're saying, because the plane flew through the airspace where the smoke and fire were just seconds before, it doesn't matter that the engines stopped once they exploded, what matters is that air had to have been spun around at those high speeds. My god these debunkers are StOOpid.
N1k1mon 1 year ago
@N1k1mon - the building stopped and broke up the bulk of the air movement that would have made a vortex
sfiorare 1 year ago
Just because you cant see it with the naked eye that does not mean it isnt there. You can see the vortex in the comparison videos BECAUSE THERE IS FUCKING SMOKE. At the very least you need a shit load of humidity , there was a vortex you just couldnt see it. Can you see the wind if it doesnt pick up rain or dust or debri or smoke, no you cant but that doesnt mean it isnt there. The people who make these videos to sell tshirt , get donations and get their faces on tv are the scum of the earth!!
ryn88220 1 year ago
@ryn88220 Keep living in that sweet denial :D
These are jet engines, not a propeller on a model plane. There should be tremendous chaos in the smoke, and there isn't. It behaves like the air completely non-turbulent up there.
Hard evidence, my friend.
forestloves 1 year ago
@forestloves Ya it was a calm morning, just what is the point of your jibberish, Watch wtc 7 collapse, and tell me why there are no explosions or glass blowing out of the building when it falls
ryn88220 1 year ago
@ryn88220 My point is that there should be tremendous tumult in the air, causing very visible vortexes :D:D Otherwise, there could have been no jet engines!
Peace ;D
forestloves 1 year ago
@forestloves This video is claiming you should see it after the plane crashes! fuckin dumb! The plane has to fly through smoke and debri in the air to see it either that or there has to be a tremendous amount of humidity. Whatch "frys 747 low flyover" and tell me what do you see behind the jet engines?
ryn88220 1 year ago
@ryn88220 you idiot. there is no smoke in that video. how are you gonna see invisible wake vortexs' without smoke?
superfuzz 1 year ago
@superfuzz Um that was my point you cant see it, thanks for answering my question homey.
ryn88220 1 year ago
How can u say their were no planes if alot of people saw the planes fly into the towers with there own eyes
Jonathanv14 1 year ago
Why would they not use real planes? Drone technology had been around since the 60's, or even earlier.
captainkiwasabi 1 year ago
wow- never even thought of that!
annebeck58 1 year ago
listen all you dirtbags i was one of the fire men that was there there were plane parts all over the place before the second plane hit.. so i think i would freaking know it was a sad day for the whole country.....
wbuttry 1 year ago
@wbuttry sure you were and every single one of us can say what ever the fuck we want
this is the internet
words don't mean shit
Slic3R1 1 year ago
@wbuttry
Yes, sad day, but that does not mean that we were told the truth about anything!
annebeck58 1 year ago
science wins again.
JPhish 1 year ago
another coincidence ... sure ...
molligemozes 1 year ago
ever thought that maybe they tunrd the jets off and glided into the building? aiming for a building when going full speed on jets is alittle hard. and so if it "wasnt a plane" what was it? a hologram? you dipshit. and what did the thousands of bistanders and LIVE newcameras see!? you are the fucking cunt of society. go jump into a cave
sxnoss40 1 year ago
@sxnoss40 exactly..
orison319 1 year ago
I've learned more from 9/11 videos than public school ever taught me
offyam 1 year ago
Hey there bud them plans didn't keep goin they stop instantay so there for it wouldn't have any air comin into the building
kountryable 1 year ago
@kountryable
watch
THEORY OF GHOSTPLANE
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
Oh and why no vortex...hey fuckstick...the plane slammed into a building at 300mph making the engines stop instantly...they DIDN'T fly by like in your examples you fuckin retard...actually retard is to nice, they even know the truth...idiot.
LetsGet2thePoint 1 year ago
engines are made out of material that can't be destroyed but only in an metdown plant bro so no the didn't stop until the rest of the plane was destroyed.again airliner's engine's are made from the strongest metal in the world making them damn near undestroyable mate.but yes they would have stop once the fuel stoped flowing and even if they didn't,they would have shoot though the building out the otherside which is clearly not the case.but line charges were used on the buildings support system.
bkeener86 1 year ago
For those who think there were NO PLANES, its pretty simply to see you got NO BRAINS! Please kill yourselves as stupidity at this level really means your fuckin worthles...lol...no planes, bunch of fuckin jerkoffs
LetsGet2thePoint 1 year ago
@LetsGet2thePoint i know. what is with these fucking conspericy theorists having a 1st grade education and denying live news footage
sxnoss40 1 year ago
thanks for this its a great point and just another hole missing for people who believe it was planes
scramkitten 2 years ago
this songs cool
pandadust1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
y not just slide down the buildings? people slide down ladders all the time?
pandadust1 2 years ago
First. jet engines dont create vortices. It's caused by the differential pressure above and below the wings, and they are emitted from the wingtips.
Second. This is just my opinion, but I would imagine the blast from the building could have disrupted the vortice's and was simply too powerful to see them
flynmid 2 years ago
This is filled with nothing about 9/11. What a crock this is and what a dip the person must be that posted this....
coleyman1 2 years ago
a) the music is SO annoying!
b) what the hell is a vortice?
c) what's the point of this video?
LAtoOC 2 years ago
9/11 wasn't a conspiracy...get over it
1. look at each of this guys videos (RKOwens4)
2. do your own research ( not youtube or wikipedia) to see if these scientific and other facts are correct
thats what i did and i now know that it really wasn't a conspiracy
Darkviperamb 2 years ago
@Darkviperamb
explain how Mr.Jennings died a person who witnessed there being dead bodies and explosions? You are right it wasn't Conspiracy but it was a plan demo of the buildings to collect lots of money!
DaShadowInc 2 years ago
"explain how Mr.Jennings died"
The fat fuck had a heart attack. There was an autopsy. His family agreed. The obituary was in all the fucking newspapers.
Of course you ignorant conspiracy fucks can't read, so maybe you missed it.
HaywuudJablomie 2 years ago
no, conspiracy theorists can't read... they're just really good at guessing what you're writing to them.
use your brain for something other than making yourself look like a damn fool.
displaced36 2 years ago
"they're just really good at guessing what you're writing to them"
So why do those ignorant fucks FAIL to answer any questions, like:
Why are there NO demo experts in the entire world that say the towers were demo'd?
Why can't you clowns find even one photo of a demo cut on a steel beam? Hard to miss those ... but you have NOTHING so far.
Why are your phony-ass "scientists & engineers" unable to publish one single journal article ANYWHERE disputing the other published studies? Chicken?
FarmGirlJB 2 years ago
"explain how Mr.Jennings died a person who witnessed there being dead bodies"
According to the coroner, his family & the obituary in the New York Times, it was a heart attack.
The fat fuck was an alcoholic who smoked like a chimney. Big surprise.
Too bad you can't find one single demo expert in the world who says the towers were demo'd.
Maybe then you wouldn't look like a complete fool.
FarmGirlJB 2 years ago
listing the names and opinions of the "demo experts", scientists, and engineers would not matter to you, no matter how much more qualified they are than you, you have your mind made up, no need to waste any time on that. i most certainly did not post that comment to you in order to start a debate with you or anyone else. that would be about as productive as arguing with a rock.
you and your friend
HaywuudJablomie must be twins...
anyways, you guys are hateful. you should try to fix that.
displaced36 2 years ago
"listing the names and opinions of the "demo experts" ... would not matter"
In other words, you really don't have ANY demo experts.
You're just a pimply-faced little kid, spreading bullshit, and you run away like a little pussy when someone calls your bluff.
Still haven't read the article on the professional demo website, have you?
Have Mommy find it for you, and help with the big words.
FarmGirlJB 2 years ago
sad, take care.
displaced36 2 years ago
Rock breaks scissors, scissors cut paper,
paper covers rock and aluminum TRANSCENDS steel?
SH1N081 2 years ago 4
this stupidity is hard to fathom.
quite baseless and pathetic
LHOdidntdoit 2 years ago
anyone who thinks "terrorist" attacked those towers is a fool. false flag operations read into it weve been doing it forever, not to mention other countries hitler WW2 false flag he burned the parlametn down said it was the Jews and invaded them with the support of the German people because they where lied to just like all you Americans!
gibbertalkin14 2 years ago
"hitler WW2 false flag he burned the parlametn down said it was the Jews and invaded them"
Ignorant fuck.
Like most conspiracy idiots, you have zero knowledge of history and can't even get your basic facts right.
No wonder you swallow that conspiracy sperm.
HaywuudJablomie 2 years ago
so your saying hitler didnt burn the parlament down? I think you need to do some history research of WW2 good luck son
gibbertalkin14 2 years ago
"hitler didnt burn the parlament down?"
He didn't say that -- he said Hitler didn't blame it on the Jews ... because he DIDN'T.
He blamed it on the Communists. Not a single Jew in the whole "plot."
If you did two minutes of actual research you'd know that the Nazis didn't set the fire -- it was one crazy Dutch commie. The Nazis just bullshitted the fire into being some phony Communist plot.
Even a Nazi court couldn't convict anyone except Van der Lubbe.
Truther fucks never research shit.
FarmGirlJB 2 years ago
@FarmGirlJB - Two thumbs down just because you were trying to help educate a dipshit twoofer...
Don't you love how they have no problem ignoring the truth? It's always some convoluted garbage that you can tell they heard somewhere and are repeating without understanding in the first place.
My favorite are the no planer physics experts that work as fry cooks during the day.
nobraintheory 1 year ago
i think that the plane hit and the fuel exploded. duh
MASTURCHEEF001 2 years ago
To brandonch25
Just received a email from you.
Why?
anyways, 19 yrs. old and c130 pilot :)
you sure bout that..... (sir)
roqone 2 years ago
@roqone
Hey's 39 and right, my dad works on airplanes/jets and ther has been no vertices since the 70's
wazer95 2 years ago
positive
brandonch25 2 years ago
actually im a cw4 (chief warrant officer 4 , for u civilians) an yes these planes can handle 500 mph its extending the recomended limits but its just like an elevator that says it only can handle 500 lbs , if u put 600 in it, is it really goin to break the answer is no because they're just operating guidlines, second these vortices are true but what isnt true is the fact that the actual plane blew up its not flying over a fire lol, it flew straight in the building stopping the plane
brandonch25 2 years ago
see pilots for 9/11 truth.
See Egypt air flight 990.
see physics textbook.
bnsamaha 2 years ago
the reason i no this is because im a c130 pilot wich is a plane not a jet ,an in a dive it can exceed 500 mph im sure if a c130 can do it a jet can do it under full power but what do i no im just a chief warrant officer 4 meaning i am an expert in aircraft an piloting them , physics, we defy the laws of physics every day man. hell the trade centers were supposed to be able to with stand that but i guess they defyd physics when they fell down, am i rite?.
brandonch25 2 years ago
shut the fuck up already... yes, we all know that your claiming to be a cw4. you've said that like 27 times already. shut the fuck up.
supergenius18 2 years ago
YA THIS VIDEO WAS EDITED A PLANE DID HIT THE FIRST BUILDING NIGGER : o)
salvadorinopride86 2 years ago
This video confuses me. lol
VZGproductions 2 years ago
I belived for 5 years. I was a late bloomer. Thanks 9/11 truth for shaking me awake.
sallyos06460 2 years ago
I belived that the "Official" stories was true for about 3years after 11/09/01 (as did most) but recently ther just seems to be twice as much evidence to prove the "truthers" to be correct. After extensive viewing of video clips, and listening to scientists and fire experts and building experts I have decided tht.....No planes were involved on Septerber 11th in New york, pentigon, or shanksville.
Annamorganjones 2 years ago
can i ask where all these people went an how a pilot could make his plane dissapear into a building but there were no planes involved rite lol, i no there were planes involved im a pilot an u cant make up three fake flights an even if they did make up three flights they cant erase planes landing somewhere thats always logged its impossible to fake tht, now im not saying it wasnt planned by the govt i have no idea but i will assure u there were three planes
brandonch25 2 years ago
Pretty much wraps it up
NudeWorldOrder 2 years ago
uhm whats missing is the 1st 15 seconds of this video where it SHOWS THE PLANE COMING IN AND HITTING IT
just1ofthegirls 2 years ago
if the plane slammed to the tower then there will be no exhaust effect, not big deal , it will turn to a missile with no effect on air
xdeiri 2 years ago
If a plane didn't hit-Then where are all the people that were on planes?
First off-REAL PLANES DO REAL THINGS
In this situation- LEAVE Wreckage
Where is the wreckage?
You figure that out and you'll find where all the (SO-Called) passengers are.
Research it.
Don't be a follower-Be a leader
The only planes used, were the ones that fired missiles.
Peace
peace
roqone 2 years ago
no planes fired missles lol, that is tha dumbest thing ive ever heard the wreckage is in tha damn buildin that clapsed man im a cw4 in the army an im a c130 pilot, but what do i no im just a pilot
brandonch25 2 years ago
watch these vids which also prove that NO planes were used
911 Taboo
september clues
theory of ghostplane
ACEBAKER911 2 years ago