The difference between "atheistic science and creation science is that the former is based on real, actual scientific fact and the latter upon an old book written by ignorant desert savages who thought the world was flat.
It just makes me rage how he uses the term "evolution" in contexts not related to biology and yet he there are still people thinking he knows what he is talking about.
We wouldn' have that problem if the christian right in this coutry would get their act together and stop being assholes. Not all christians (and in turn religious people) are creaionists but all creationists are religious. And fundamentalist religion is dangerous, it's what the US constitution was made to prevent while ensuring people cans till be religious if they choose (so long as they don't infringe on others' rights) but what do we see instead?
@GargantuanLifeform99 And about ridiculing creationists... well, they do the same AND worst since they have to lie and distort the facts to try to fool others into believing the ridiculous non-sense they do.
So ridiculing religious fools is not enough, we have simply to stop them as we all know how dangerous it is to let religion run free as we have the dark ages to remind us that we should be 300 years ahead and have already found the cure for cancer, AIDS, hunger etc if we were religion free
@GargantuanLifeform99 "contemporary physicists conjectures upon the Nature of Reality sound Theological! e.g;the Multiverse.." it does to people with very little or none at all understanding of quantum physics or the scientific method...like yourself. You have no idea, by what you just wrote, what "the scientific method" and I amo not here to hold your hand and help you cross the street but I tell you right now, science doesn't work with beliefs but facts...
@GargantuanLifeform99 (continues) either irrefutably disproved (earth being flat and/or the center of the universe, the earth/universe being only 6 thousands yo. etc.) or it is nothing more than speculation/made up stories of all-powerful yet ridiculously shallow-minded and jealous divine entities (the god from the bible acts worse than a spoiled teen-girl that wants to be the center of attention all the time).
So, one thing is certain, religion has nothing concrete to say about our place here!
@GargantuanLifeform99 "Understanding our place in the Universe is not the job of Scientists!"
Says who? You? based on what? Your faith in stone-age old fairy tales?
Sorry to burst the bubble you live in but saying scientific/empirical knowledge cannot answer philosophical questions is merely theological propaganda that you obviously bought into.
For starters, everything religious scriptures or leaders have said about the natural world and it's origin has been either irrefutably (continues)
"...and so evolutionary theories say that Mercury cannot have a magnetic core."
"Excuse me, sir? Can you please state what the theory of evolution is for me?"
"Absolutely. Evolutionary theory claims the universe came from nothing in six parts, Cosmic, Chemical, Stellar..."
"Right, I'm going to hand you a high school biology textbook now. Could you read sentence one in paragraph one on page one in chapter one please, starting with 'Evolution is...'"
Ah I thought this was actually going into the details of his speech instead of just being a big generalization. Guess no one can debunk his actual specific claims apparently. Like Mercury having a Magnetic Field. Science of the Gaps it is then.
The difference between science and engineering is that in engineering, you aren't taught to not value your intelligence in favor of hard evidence. - personal reflection on why so many of these so called "scientific" creationists are from engineering backgrounds.
How stupid are these guys, though evolutionist say, this and that about all these topics that have nothing to do with evolution. Ehhh no theologist, say a whole lot of crap based on the bible that honestly says little to nothing on any field of science.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Why do atheists tend to use people with british or australian accents to narrate their videos. It's still complete bunk no matter who's reading the script.
@AndromedasWake Hmm, maybe it isnt being narrorated by an outside person. Perhaps that is the real accent of the person who made this phenominal video. This is coming from a Canadian, not a British or Australian person, so there is no bias. They just happen to be smart, informed people who made the videos.
@theabiotictheory yes damn them atheist with their facts and evidence it's really the British/Australian foreigners with their suave accent that convince people that there is no god!!1! not like it's possible to believe in a god without the earth being 6000 years old! damn you atheists!
@heavenlyheathen Why don't atheists ever accurately portray the 6 thousand year \ 14 billion year argument? They frame it as if a christian chooses the biblical date, then he's willfully ignorant of the science. I've reviewed the science and it is absolutely preposterous. It's basically a 14 billion year long thread of one highly improbable event followed by a succession of increasingly more highly improbable events. Who says you don't need faith to be an atheist.
@heavenlyheathen How did the moon form. A large Mars sized object floating through space one day collided with earth and hung around to become our moon. The massive impact also gave us our 24 hour day and the seasons. It seems atheist science uses these cosmic collisions as sort of a magic wand to explain away any problem that conflicts with their precious models. Instead of becoming creationists, they simply become more creative.
@theabiotictheory Except, you know, the whole part where there's real evidence supporting all of those collisions. I'm sorry that it's hard for you to accept that the early solar system was replete with cosmic collisions or that those collisions played a part in solar formation. Your entire argument is essentially how you don't like it; science doesn't care about personal preference. It relies on evidence. Cosmic bodies slamming into each other is a fairly common occurrence.
@theabiotictheory What's your alternative? A magical sky daddy? Does that explanation fit the evidence? If we have the Chicxulub Crater, over twenty years worth of detailed information in various fields including sedimentology, paleontology, geophysics, geochemistry, and climate modelling by dozens of experts from a wealth of institutions concluding that the impact was responsible for the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction, you say it's untrue because it involved a bolide impact. Evidence be damned.
@AletheianAeon How do you explain the Giant Impact Hypothesis, if the moon has such a tremendous amount of water in its mantle? How did it all accumulate there? Brown University has a video on YT asking the same question and they came to the conclusion that, that theory is falsified as well.
@AletheianAeon The only reason astronomers use these collisions as an explanation for the development of the early solar system, is because if they didn't happen, then it would disprove their theory of early planet formation. Circular reasoning. This actually is a moot point because NASA has all but falsified the Nebular Hypothesis anyway.
@heavenlyheathen How come the martian atmosphere is so thin? It became forever changed after an encounter with an asteroid. Why does Uranus have that unusual tilt? An asteroid smashed into it and knocked it over. According to planetary spacing guidelines, there theoretically should be a planet between Mars and Jupiter because of the usually large distance between the two. There was but an asteroid impact knocked it off its orbit and propelled it towards the sun where it incinerated.
@heavenlyheathen This video with its mention of an object smashing into Mercury and reducing its size is a familiar explanation from atheist science. Why does the rotation of Venus contradict current atheist science models? An asteroid collided with it causing it to turn in the wrong direction. Why caused the sudden extinction of the dinosaurs? An asteroid crashed into Mexico 65 million years ago causing catastrophic climate change and choking them all off.
@theabiotictheory Idiot, maybe it's because they're smarter than you Americans? And you call it bunk, but you obviously don't listen to what they say, you just come here, troll, and go read the bible...
I'm currently having an argument with a creationist but we can't get to the good stuff because we are stuck on his mixing of sciences. He says stuff like "evolution has trouble with mercury blah blah blah". I'm trying to tell him that the explanation of biodiversity and common decent doesn't comment on bloody mercury. I say that's astronomy and he looks at me like I'm just not getting it. It's difficult to destroy years of hovindist brainwashing in one argument.
there may be some things that evolution has not explained (there are some things) but certainly, there is NO evidence against common ancestory, the details still need working out but common ancestory is an undeniable fact
TY AndromedasWake, for debunking Spike Psarris finally. That smug gave us engineers a bad name for claiming creation has any fulfilling explanation against cosmology.
See, the point of a discussion, where one side is science and the other is creationists, is that ideas are exchanged and eventually one sides' ideas will prevail with rational, respectful arguments that stand on their own.
So far, I have yet to see 1 creationist fully acknowledge 1 countering scientific idea.
I'm really starting to think getting a degree in chemistry will be a piece of cake, regarding grades, because these creationists with degrees don't seem to be very smart or either telling lies to sell books. I'm hoping it's selling lies, they can't be that stupid. I can understand scientists in the past, a lot wasn't know but the lay can understand the basics of what's now discovered. The people listening are even worse. Did they take a high school Biology class?
@mrhnm Meaning that these things formed due to natural (and observable) processes, as opposed to "Magic Man dunnit." Planet and star formation are not related to life, so them being lumped under evolution is just stupid.
In response to the video, this quote is just too perfect. "Science knows it doesn't know everything, otherwise it'd stop." - Dara O'Briain
First of all, I wouldn't DREAM of understanding an infinitesimal part of the theories being presented. My doubt rests in the fact that creationist and theists DEMAND that science proves EVERY DETAIL OF EVERY THEORY EVER PRESENTED, while (conveniently) not offering a sliver of proof to ANY of their theories.
When they say God created... they do not offer ANY SHRED OF A HINT OF PROOF.
I was born into a creationist family and I believe it really stifled me. I was installed a sort of subtle paranoia about science, but three years ago when I was 17, I really began studying science. I had the original intention of proving myself right, but with the greatest humility I found I was so very wrong and brainwashed with fear of hell. I became a brand-new person, "born again" you may say (pun intended). I'd like to thank the internet and people like you for sharing science. Logic rules.
@VanKlaunch that's awesome man, i myself have been atheist since i was very young (currently 19) but many of my friends have over the past few years gone through similar experiences to yours. it's always nice to see people figuring things out for themselves and not accepting the crap they are fed on a spoon! peace.
@0ngus I grew up in the Bible-Belt and still live there, and being an atheist here is seen with fear and misunderstanding, just like how most people here view homosexuals and minorities. I have and wear a shirt that says: "Atheism: A non-prophet organization". Instead of laughs and smiles for the wittiness of said shirt, I usually just get awkward, disturbed looks. Most of the people are good, nice people, but when it comes to certain subjects, they are just completely off their rockers.
"Evolutionary theories say that Mercury cannot have a magnetic field. But it does!"
WOAH!! WTF does magnetic fields have to do with evolution?? O.o
Where do you find these guys?? This incredible stupidity and/or dishonsty is just so through the roof that I think my socks just spontaneously burst into fire!
Thanks for posting this. I have almost always loved astronomy. The only time I disliked the subject was when I was a young man on lookout duty on a Cdn warship sailing the Pacific. On the first clear night since we sailed on the way to Hawaii, I reported an aircraft... It was Mars. In my defence, I'm a city kid. The best place to look at the sky is not on land, it's in the middle of an ocean, too bad that's not practical for an observatory...
Wow, apart from everything else - which you adressed nicely - I just can't believe he keeps talking about "Evolution" not being able to explain Mercury.
You speech is a little fast. But the information and the process of how you arrived at it was brilliant. I personally am interested in the origin of Mars's moons. It's an oddity for me how they got there? I don't think they formed with Mars; My best guess would be there are bits of Mars that got chiseled of from an Asteroid impact. Keep up the good work.
Evolution is based on careful, repeated observations and predictions about the natural world and Creationism is based on some moron saying "No you're wrong!" without any evidence to back them up!
religious fundamentalism eating this planet !! glad some like andromedaswake exist to open the eyes of the people science is like freedom ,open the doors of the true with dignity !!! :)
I love watching these videos, but on the other hand I kind of die inside when I see how stupid these creationists can be. Keep up the good work; your videos are top-notch.
its good that you stay in your field of study, I don;t like it when people who pretend to be experts and talk about every topic... I still don't understand how that one creationist is an astrophysicist and still doesn't believe the universe is old lol makes no sense...
IHe can't do much harm scientifically, anything he writes must be peer reviewed. Basically due to the system, he can either do nothing or improve our knowlage. So diversity in ideas is a good thing from a scientific viewpoint :). You can almost look at the scientific system as an evolutionary system. The more variation, the better the outcome I guess :)
wtf are you babbling about? A bachelors degree in electronic engineering=dont know shit about mercury. Do you also believe the guy who cleans the shitters for the astronauts is an expert on mercury too? He does work for nasa you know.
@adam9920042004 The fundie speaker is NOT a PhD in astrophysics. What makes you think he has some unique insights that that literally THOUSANDS OF BRILLIANT scientists who ARE PhDs. In this video...he makes DUMB statements that confound physics and biology...he is bogus no matter where he worked...given the gross scientific errors he makes in just these few minutes he could have just as easily been the Janitor at NASA!
Thank you Andromedaswake for your work and efforts to help us, humans, get rid of faith based lies that have been holding us back from understanding our place in the universe.
Theory in general isn`t an all out explanation; it`s a hypothesis that acts as model. If Additional data is found to disprove a previous theory, then it is thrown out and a new theory fitting the evidence is adopted. This is the scientific method. Like you said in the video; gaps aren`t proof of a god, it`s just the standard scientific method.
Wanting to know more about the universe seems obvious. I pity creationalists who are content with ignorance .
Spike Psarris is just like Kirk Cameron and other creationists that claim to have been athiests. They were non religious. There is a huge difference.
Non religious-doesn't follow a religion. Makes no claim about the existence of Gods
Atheism-doesn't follow a religion. Claims (hopefully backed by scientific study, reason and logic) that there are no Gods, or the existence of Gods is unlikely
The exact difference lies in the gnosticism of the beliefs ; A non-religious person is mostly unaware of religious ideas and concepts and thus ignores religious beliefs based on a lack of knowledge of it - an atheist knows of religious ideas, of concepts, and choses not to believe in them for various reasons - in other words, an atheist is a knowledgable disbeliever, whilst a non-religious person is unknowledgable as a disbeliever.
Nasa photo`s of Mercury & our moon are to simular to dismiss.
Nasa`s photo`s of the outer gas planets also seem to have a distubing relationship to our inter planet with the prespective of a astroid belt seperating the inter and outer groups..
I can`t find a logical evolution pattern to the structure of our solar system as produced by Nasa photo`s.
Unless we have has some type of a planet impacted colision that started it all.
Is Nasa`s photo`s all a fraud and everything is wrong?
Mercury is frozen ON THE NIGHT SIDE because the solar wind has blown away its atmosphere. It's SCORCHING on the day side. This is because, sans atmosphere, heat can't convect to the other side. Venus is much farther out, so the the solar wind has much less effect on the atmosphere and is further reduced by the EM field (if it still has one, but it does spin rather slowly to maintain it). The atmosphere is also held in by Venus' gravity and produces a greenhouse effect, heating the planet.
Venus sound like a early earth after the collision...and Mercury sound like the moon object that just hit a planet. that killed off the dinasours...LOL
the creationist literally can't have his way with a rational person cause even IF (and they haven't been able on any level so far) they succeed to disprove anything that is not in any way evidence for their point - not in any - even if they somehow prove that ALL science is wrong that doesn't make them right ....
you can view it that way but u have to take in account that scientific dogma isn't literally dogma - it's changeable - whereas religious dogma is not only unchangeable but unquestionable - so i don't find it even similar...
well to each his own, as long as it doesn't encroach on my crap... :)
Well... WE must be touchie? You where most likely one of those guy in your past life that screamed; She a witch, She a witch, burn the witch..
You`ll really have to watch the Monty Python video skit. When ask why she was a witch the crowd had no good answer ..But gave a rather stupid answer. LIKE
WELL SHE LOOK LIKE A WITCH The judge ask what does a witch look like?
That`s when it get really fun. Watch the skit some time and ask yourself if that`s the way you to people at time.
No such things as past lives retard an no I'm not touchy,put up or shut up is a common expression.
It means state your case or shut up and don't waste my time,and you didn't answer me(surprise.....not!)so fuck off and go learn some basic physics and stop wasting my time.
She doesn't look like a witch but you just look like shit,retard
Your are welcome to delude yourself but you havent even made a point.
Trying to debate with a fundie is like playing chess with a pigeon who knocks the pieces over and takes a crap on the board and then claims victory,just like you have just done.
Only thing I don't enjoy about this series is that I can't read and listen at the same time. If I'm reading I miss the audio. If I'm listening I miss the written words. Damn my simple mind. Kudos otherwise!
um in your quantum box.....maybe lmfao cats always know best i like how during the black plague it was made worse cause they killed off evil witch cats that ate all the plague rats score one for religion again
i agree spike doesnt know what he is talking about. but he like some creation scientists and some evolution/ "professional"scientists are not speaking on behalf of science but merely to combat each others own beliefs/religions.
Nice vid! I really don't get the link between Mercury and evolution that is posed by this Spike figure. The main problem is ignorance, not because people have a religion, but because they fail to understand the subjects they're trying to disprove.
I'm a real creationist and you are doing a good job getting the CRAP exposed, these guys drive me nuts... You have got these creationist who are not so brilliant scrutinizing your theories and in responce you scrutinize there scrutiny (and insult them). If your theories are true then proving them is the best way to debunk creationism..
If you understood science, you'd know that theories can never be proven or verified absolutely. The scientific method can only partially verify, or falsify scientific theores. Creationism is not a scientific theory; not even a scientific hypothesis. I only need to falsify the statements of the creationist, as the burden of proof lies with him/her.
your haughty jibes denote frustration. it's not incumbent upon me to understand science (that's what scientists are for); no more than it is for you to know how to remove a brain tumor (that's what surgeons are for). in my world, science and God can coexist because i'm not a fundamentalist crackpot like the targets in your videos. i will keep my belief and never impose it on those who wish to believe otherwise. simply put, this means that it is up to you to PROVE me wrong. good debunking to you.
Obviously if someone is vastly more intelligent than you they're opinions are worth more than that of an uninformed or ignorant person. You've just admitted your inherent ignorance, which autamatically devalues any opinions you might have. In other words, "your world" is extremely negligible. In most cases you can't prove a negative, so the statement continues to devalue your opinion.
Sorry if I came off like a wanker, but I hate fallacies. See ya, m8.
did a pinhead just say something to me? looking to curry favour with someone are we? i can just imagine you in the workplace... pain in the ass. i can't stand sycophants. do you get beat up a lot? oh... God bless, noodoo19.
-And let the childish insults commence. Just proves you haven't got anything smart to say. Fuck Andromeda, fuck him up his Nebula. I just had something I wanted to say.
i've gotta tell ya that i find this ongoing arguement between the creationists and non to be childish and petty. what if you were to replace the creationists' (some, not all) strict adherence to the Bible's timelines with the belief that the origin of the universe is as modern cosmology states it is, but that God set all of THAT in motion? would there still be an arguement, or just a difference of opinion? how could/would science empirically refute that? arrogance = bad, on any side.
Science doesn't refute gods or magic. It merely has a track record for exposing anything that was ever attributed to a god as having a natural cause. Putting god as merely the prime mover is simply a god of the gaps argument. It's naive to think there can't be natural "causes" for our universe. Since science has systematically improved our knowledge, and god continuously been pushed back, I think it's perfectly fair to assume one method is better than the other.
for the record, i am a believer in science and appreciate where it has taken humanity (the obvious misuses aside). at the same time however, i like the idea of God; not this malevolent entity who threatens with horrific punishment, but one who set up this truly sublime universe for us to discover; created it to follow the rules we continue to uncover and then got out of the way and allowed us free will.
(1/2) You might like the idea of a deity, but what use is that in understanding the Universe? If your idea can't be falsified, it's meaningless in understanding the natural world. But that's not the real issue. If you are willing to postulate supernatural creation, you've violated the philosophy of naturalism, and have no good reason not to simply say that YEC is true, and that the Universe was supernaturally created to look old. Your only reason for believing otherwise is because you *like* the
(2/2) idea of a deity who isn't malevolent, but kind. You haven't infered anything about said deity, but rather just applied that characteristic to it yourself. Why? Because you *like* it. This method for understanding things (ie. making untestible things up and applying characteristics to them) is very inferior to the scientific method. Saying "Perhaps he did it this way.." is just mindless, unfalsifiable speculation. No better than Russel's teapot. This mysticism is always trumped by science.
That is amazing how you can infer my entire view of the universe from a comment i made on your video. that is mystic. Sorry If you don't like my choice of wording. You can replace "prove" with "Further validate to the point that there is no evidence against it." Your rignt it's not fair that the burden of prof is with science and not creationism. Like you said creationism isn't a science. If god created the universe don't you think it mignt be the only way to understand the universe
When a theory is proven (yes, none have) they become scientific fact. philoshophically thinking: if it is true it can't be proven wrong. Right! Accept creationist theories as a means of futher validating your own theories by debunking them. thats what im saying. Don't be a butt hurt bitch about it.
You haved debunked what I had thought were good creationist argument in astronomy. good job! Please keep making videos.
Sorry this vid failed horribly, nothing can't create something. FAIL!
SuperKvance 1 month ago
@SuperKvance "Nothing can't create something."
Oh look, a straw-man fallacy!
heavymetaldeath4life 1 week ago in playlist Favorite videos
Dear AndromedasWake , is there any specific topology for your videos or is it ok to simply watch them in no particular order?
Astro-physics is my weaker side, it's good to have you around :)
PRJking 1 month ago
The difference between "atheistic science and creation science is that the former is based on real, actual scientific fact and the latter upon an old book written by ignorant desert savages who thought the world was flat.
8698gil 1 month ago
It just makes me rage how he uses the term "evolution" in contexts not related to biology and yet he there are still people thinking he knows what he is talking about.
Tamizushi 2 months ago
@GargantuanLifeform99
We wouldn' have that problem if the christian right in this coutry would get their act together and stop being assholes. Not all christians (and in turn religious people) are creaionists but all creationists are religious. And fundamentalist religion is dangerous, it's what the US constitution was made to prevent while ensuring people cans till be religious if they choose (so long as they don't infringe on others' rights) but what do we see instead?
NUTCASE71733 3 months ago
@GargantuanLifeform99 And about ridiculing creationists... well, they do the same AND worst since they have to lie and distort the facts to try to fool others into believing the ridiculous non-sense they do.
So ridiculing religious fools is not enough, we have simply to stop them as we all know how dangerous it is to let religion run free as we have the dark ages to remind us that we should be 300 years ahead and have already found the cure for cancer, AIDS, hunger etc if we were religion free
tommytalks77 3 months ago
@GargantuanLifeform99 "contemporary physicists conjectures upon the Nature of Reality sound Theological! e.g;the Multiverse.." it does to people with very little or none at all understanding of quantum physics or the scientific method...like yourself. You have no idea, by what you just wrote, what "the scientific method" and I amo not here to hold your hand and help you cross the street but I tell you right now, science doesn't work with beliefs but facts...
tommytalks77 3 months ago
@GargantuanLifeform99 (continues) either irrefutably disproved (earth being flat and/or the center of the universe, the earth/universe being only 6 thousands yo. etc.) or it is nothing more than speculation/made up stories of all-powerful yet ridiculously shallow-minded and jealous divine entities (the god from the bible acts worse than a spoiled teen-girl that wants to be the center of attention all the time).
So, one thing is certain, religion has nothing concrete to say about our place here!
tommytalks77 3 months ago
@GargantuanLifeform99 "Understanding our place in the Universe is not the job of Scientists!"
Says who? You? based on what? Your faith in stone-age old fairy tales?
Sorry to burst the bubble you live in but saying scientific/empirical knowledge cannot answer philosophical questions is merely theological propaganda that you obviously bought into.
For starters, everything religious scriptures or leaders have said about the natural world and it's origin has been either irrefutably (continues)
tommytalks77 3 months ago
I like how the word "evolution" seems to kind of just mean "evil science" to creationists.
GuacamoleKun 4 months ago
"...and so evolutionary theories say that Mercury cannot have a magnetic core."
"Excuse me, sir? Can you please state what the theory of evolution is for me?"
"Absolutely. Evolutionary theory claims the universe came from nothing in six parts, Cosmic, Chemical, Stellar..."
"Right, I'm going to hand you a high school biology textbook now. Could you read sentence one in paragraph one on page one in chapter one please, starting with 'Evolution is...'"
"No."
"Why not?"
"I... can't read?"
"..."
"..."
rkyeun 4 months ago
Creationism: When being wrong is considered better than admitting you don't know s**t.
MunkyDrag0n 4 months ago
The music makes this an epic creation owning
dowshipwigga 5 months ago
OMG de-s your audio. Great vids by the way. x
ultimateinfinite 6 months ago
What other info is there on the "Core Cooling" theory?
israelfnp 7 months ago
Ah I thought this was actually going into the details of his speech instead of just being a big generalization. Guess no one can debunk his actual specific claims apparently. Like Mercury having a Magnetic Field. Science of the Gaps it is then.
israelfnp 7 months ago
@israelfnp
"Like Mercury having a Magnetic Field. "
Uh retard, AW said why that is so. And it's not retarded creationism.
Now go into the oven jew.
mecher3k 6 months ago
how am I supposed to think when I just wana DANCE! nice sound track
animeforte369 8 months ago
creationism = failed assumptions.
LordHines420 8 months ago 5
The difference between science and engineering is that in engineering, you aren't taught to not value your intelligence in favor of hard evidence. - personal reflection on why so many of these so called "scientific" creationists are from engineering backgrounds.
metareborn 9 months ago
How stupid are these guys, though evolutionist say, this and that about all these topics that have nothing to do with evolution. Ehhh no theologist, say a whole lot of crap based on the bible that honestly says little to nothing on any field of science.
ASexyChef 10 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why do atheists tend to use people with british or australian accents to narrate their videos. It's still complete bunk no matter who's reading the script.
theabiotictheory 11 months ago
@theabiotictheory ...?
AndromedasWake 11 months ago 39
@AndromedasWake Hmm, maybe it isnt being narrorated by an outside person. Perhaps that is the real accent of the person who made this phenominal video. This is coming from a Canadian, not a British or Australian person, so there is no bias. They just happen to be smart, informed people who made the videos.
ajf1060 10 months ago
@AndromedasWake I love how stupid theists continually prove themselves to be.
yourjunk420 6 months ago
@theabiotictheory yes damn them atheist with their facts and evidence it's really the British/Australian foreigners with their suave accent that convince people that there is no god!!1! not like it's possible to believe in a god without the earth being 6000 years old! damn you atheists!
heavenlyheathen 11 months ago
@heavenlyheathen Why don't atheists ever accurately portray the 6 thousand year \ 14 billion year argument? They frame it as if a christian chooses the biblical date, then he's willfully ignorant of the science. I've reviewed the science and it is absolutely preposterous. It's basically a 14 billion year long thread of one highly improbable event followed by a succession of increasingly more highly improbable events. Who says you don't need faith to be an atheist.
theabiotictheory 11 months ago
@heavenlyheathen How did the moon form. A large Mars sized object floating through space one day collided with earth and hung around to become our moon. The massive impact also gave us our 24 hour day and the seasons. It seems atheist science uses these cosmic collisions as sort of a magic wand to explain away any problem that conflicts with their precious models. Instead of becoming creationists, they simply become more creative.
theabiotictheory 11 months ago
@theabiotictheory Except, you know, the whole part where there's real evidence supporting all of those collisions. I'm sorry that it's hard for you to accept that the early solar system was replete with cosmic collisions or that those collisions played a part in solar formation. Your entire argument is essentially how you don't like it; science doesn't care about personal preference. It relies on evidence. Cosmic bodies slamming into each other is a fairly common occurrence.
AletheianAeon 5 months ago
@theabiotictheory What's your alternative? A magical sky daddy? Does that explanation fit the evidence? If we have the Chicxulub Crater, over twenty years worth of detailed information in various fields including sedimentology, paleontology, geophysics, geochemistry, and climate modelling by dozens of experts from a wealth of institutions concluding that the impact was responsible for the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction, you say it's untrue because it involved a bolide impact. Evidence be damned.
AletheianAeon 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AletheianAeon How do you explain the Giant Impact Hypothesis, if the moon has such a tremendous amount of water in its mantle? How did it all accumulate there? Brown University has a video on YT asking the same question and they came to the conclusion that, that theory is falsified as well.
theabiotictheory 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AletheianAeon The only reason astronomers use these collisions as an explanation for the development of the early solar system, is because if they didn't happen, then it would disprove their theory of early planet formation. Circular reasoning. This actually is a moot point because NASA has all but falsified the Nebular Hypothesis anyway.
theabiotictheory 5 months ago
@heavenlyheathen How come the martian atmosphere is so thin? It became forever changed after an encounter with an asteroid. Why does Uranus have that unusual tilt? An asteroid smashed into it and knocked it over. According to planetary spacing guidelines, there theoretically should be a planet between Mars and Jupiter because of the usually large distance between the two. There was but an asteroid impact knocked it off its orbit and propelled it towards the sun where it incinerated.
theabiotictheory 11 months ago
@heavenlyheathen This video with its mention of an object smashing into Mercury and reducing its size is a familiar explanation from atheist science. Why does the rotation of Venus contradict current atheist science models? An asteroid collided with it causing it to turn in the wrong direction. Why caused the sudden extinction of the dinosaurs? An asteroid crashed into Mexico 65 million years ago causing catastrophic climate change and choking them all off.
theabiotictheory 11 months ago
@theabiotictheory "res ipsa loquitur" in the absence of evidence to the contrary you are clearly a dickhead
vohshkab 10 months ago
@theabiotictheory ????????????????????
mignik01 11 months ago
@theabiotictheory
Brits and Australians are MORE INTELLIGENT than your creationist self. LOL
Primordialfan1 10 months ago
@theabiotictheory how so?
playadominical 9 months ago
@theabiotictheory
Just another day in AMERIKUH.
kissmygrittsyall 6 months ago
@theabiotictheory
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
dowshipwigga 5 months ago
@theabiotictheory What kind of babbling bullshit are you talking about? Would you like to point out one, just one, instance of 'bunk'?
uniteordie1 4 months ago
@theabiotictheory Idiot, maybe it's because they're smarter than you Americans? And you call it bunk, but you obviously don't listen to what they say, you just come here, troll, and go read the bible...
MagMag96 3 months ago
@theabiotictheory
Maybe because on the other side of the Atlantic people aren't idiots and wish to undermine education in the name of religion.
NUTCASE71733 3 months ago
I'm currently having an argument with a creationist but we can't get to the good stuff because we are stuck on his mixing of sciences. He says stuff like "evolution has trouble with mercury blah blah blah". I'm trying to tell him that the explanation of biodiversity and common decent doesn't comment on bloody mercury. I say that's astronomy and he looks at me like I'm just not getting it. It's difficult to destroy years of hovindist brainwashing in one argument.
ptango101 1 year ago
6:30
EGGS!
thissystemneeds 1 year ago
"I have a degree in Jesus" HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH
stefanhasausername 1 year ago
Thanks for your great videos, AndromedasWake. I'm a working scientist and there's a bunch of info I didn't know in here, not being an astrophysicist.
That's not to mention the LOLs and ROFLs at the expense of the poor creationists who you totally PWN, bud.
Subscribing, and telling my friends...
ChollieD 1 year ago
ohhh only 347 dislikes, one of the christian wackjobs got confused and dropped off by now.
mako7828 1 year ago
I take issue with your insinuation about electrical engineers. *thinking* "Fuck why didn't I just read phsyics?!"
huddl007 1 year ago
I wish I could thumbs up your entire channal...
ImperiousViking 1 year ago
Gordon Freeman is not a nuclear physicist, he's a theoretical physicist. COME ON!
Spherical3 1 year ago
I don't get just one thing; Why they call EVERYTHING(literally everything that they are countering with their pseudo-science) 'evolutionary theory'...
And why the hell always when they actually DO talk about evolution state that it explains the origin of life(as it apparently does not, nor can)?
I mean how you can even reason someone like that?
Can i learn someone to differ 50% blue from 50% red if that one is a daltonist...
Orthodoxcrusader 1 year ago
347 creationists watched this.
VagianTuerous 1 year ago
Thanks Andromeda'sWake for that. Neat clip -well done. :-)
Just one small nit with it - I think the sulphur you note at the 7 min. 25-30 second mark was found on volcanic Io and not water-ice Europa.
Otherwise, its awesome. :-)
Astrostevo 1 year ago
there may be some things that evolution has not explained (there are some things) but certainly, there is NO evidence against common ancestory, the details still need working out but common ancestory is an undeniable fact
blazereef 1 year ago
TY AndromedasWake, for debunking Spike Psarris finally. That smug gave us engineers a bad name for claiming creation has any fulfilling explanation against cosmology.
See, the point of a discussion, where one side is science and the other is creationists, is that ideas are exchanged and eventually one sides' ideas will prevail with rational, respectful arguments that stand on their own.
So far, I have yet to see 1 creationist fully acknowledge 1 countering scientific idea.
Stubborn fellas.
Ital21 1 year ago
you did not show any fact just boblboblblb
drshamast 1 year ago
@drshamast Some clarity and specifics would be nice when communicating opinions.
Ital21 1 year ago
I'm really starting to think getting a degree in chemistry will be a piece of cake, regarding grades, because these creationists with degrees don't seem to be very smart or either telling lies to sell books. I'm hoping it's selling lies, they can't be that stupid. I can understand scientists in the past, a lot wasn't know but the lay can understand the basics of what's now discovered. The people listening are even worse. Did they take a high school Biology class?
HybridD91 1 year ago
Lol at the morgan freeman and O RLY? YA RLY.
susideguy 1 year ago
What do you mean by "Natural Formation" since for something to be formed it has to be natural.
mrhnm 1 year ago
@mrhnm Meaning that these things formed due to natural (and observable) processes, as opposed to "Magic Man dunnit." Planet and star formation are not related to life, so them being lumped under evolution is just stupid.
In response to the video, this quote is just too perfect. "Science knows it doesn't know everything, otherwise it'd stop." - Dara O'Briain
whybag 1 year ago
@whybag Ok thanks for the clarifacation.
PS Awesome quote.
mrhnm 1 year ago
The frequency with which that guy used the word evolution in his “lecture” about the solar system is an embarrassment to all human kind.
Snipe4261 1 year ago
Can't believe I never thought to subscribe to your channel before now. Best dedicated series focused around cosmology yet.
TheNeognostic 1 year ago
First of all, I wouldn't DREAM of understanding an infinitesimal part of the theories being presented. My doubt rests in the fact that creationist and theists DEMAND that science proves EVERY DETAIL OF EVERY THEORY EVER PRESENTED, while (conveniently) not offering a sliver of proof to ANY of their theories.
When they say God created... they do not offer ANY SHRED OF A HINT OF PROOF.
Shouldn't we ask them for spark of proof?????
theo97279 1 year ago
An Eon is really not that long on the scale of a solar system anyway.
CoolFire666 1 year ago
I was born into a creationist family and I believe it really stifled me. I was installed a sort of subtle paranoia about science, but three years ago when I was 17, I really began studying science. I had the original intention of proving myself right, but with the greatest humility I found I was so very wrong and brainwashed with fear of hell. I became a brand-new person, "born again" you may say (pun intended). I'd like to thank the internet and people like you for sharing science. Logic rules.
VanKlaunch 1 year ago 3
@VanKlaunch that's awesome man, i myself have been atheist since i was very young (currently 19) but many of my friends have over the past few years gone through similar experiences to yours. it's always nice to see people figuring things out for themselves and not accepting the crap they are fed on a spoon! peace.
0ngus 1 year ago
@0ngus I grew up in the Bible-Belt and still live there, and being an atheist here is seen with fear and misunderstanding, just like how most people here view homosexuals and minorities. I have and wear a shirt that says: "Atheism: A non-prophet organization". Instead of laughs and smiles for the wittiness of said shirt, I usually just get awkward, disturbed looks. Most of the people are good, nice people, but when it comes to certain subjects, they are just completely off their rockers.
VanKlaunch 1 year ago
"Evolutionary theories say that Mercury cannot have a magnetic field. But it does!"
WOAH!! WTF does magnetic fields have to do with evolution?? O.o
Where do you find these guys?? This incredible stupidity and/or dishonsty is just so through the roof that I think my socks just spontaneously burst into fire!
... yes... indeed, they did :-o
balkan2k 1 year ago
7:19 Mofuggas gonna droppa the preshaaaaahh :D
Zryuken 1 year ago
"And I recommend it to both Creationists, and honest decent people alike"
BURN!
tipoomaster 1 year ago 4
@tipoomaster Bazinga!
shinigamiL0ki 1 year ago
Thanks for posting this. I have almost always loved astronomy. The only time I disliked the subject was when I was a young man on lookout duty on a Cdn warship sailing the Pacific. On the first clear night since we sailed on the way to Hawaii, I reported an aircraft... It was Mars. In my defence, I'm a city kid. The best place to look at the sky is not on land, it's in the middle of an ocean, too bad that's not practical for an observatory...
TheSaturnalia 1 year ago
Wow, apart from everything else - which you adressed nicely - I just can't believe he keeps talking about "Evolution" not being able to explain Mercury.
gagaplex 1 year ago
2:47 - Half-Life was a documentary
Anghellik9 1 year ago
@Anghellik9 Of course!
patq911 1 year ago
You speech is a little fast. But the information and the process of how you arrived at it was brilliant. I personally am interested in the origin of Mars's moons. It's an oddity for me how they got there? I don't think they formed with Mars; My best guess would be there are bits of Mars that got chiseled of from an Asteroid impact. Keep up the good work.
TheLostHibiki 1 year ago
Your videos are absolutely amazing.
GuBB3rGuN 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bisbas3232
"Evolution is based on faith more than Religion"
Evolution is based on careful, repeated observations and predictions about the natural world and Creationism is based on some moron saying "No you're wrong!" without any evidence to back them up!
bdobbsthepipe 1 year ago
religious fundamentalism eating this planet !! glad some like andromedaswake exist to open the eyes of the people science is like freedom ,open the doors of the true with dignity !!! :)
liteloven11 1 year ago
lol, Kent Hovind has a degree in Jesus
TheHomelessCripple 1 year ago
Brilliant stuff, Andromeda's wake!
Great music, clear narration, and strong visuals make for great vids.
FiverBeyond 2 years ago
The immunity of creationists to science no matter how basic can be summerised thusly:
NeoCon v Radical Islam = ruthless attempt to manifest ignorant slave pool to service hypocritical elite.
intermender 2 years ago
I love watching these videos, but on the other hand I kind of die inside when I see how stupid these creationists can be. Keep up the good work; your videos are top-notch.
giggletronics 2 years ago 4
I know the feeling.
Watching Thunderfoot's Why Do People Laugh At Creatonists certainly showed a whole new world of ignorance and denial I did not know existed
Korkzor 2 years ago 2
its good that you stay in your field of study, I don;t like it when people who pretend to be experts and talk about every topic... I still don't understand how that one creationist is an astrophysicist and still doesn't believe the universe is old lol makes no sense...
Eyesonme805 2 years ago
Let him though :)
IHe can't do much harm scientifically, anything he writes must be peer reviewed. Basically due to the system, he can either do nothing or improve our knowlage. So diversity in ideas is a good thing from a scientific viewpoint :). You can almost look at the scientific system as an evolutionary system. The more variation, the better the outcome I guess :)
TakesTwoToTango 2 years ago
"thanks to everyone that has sent in crap" rofl...
OskyATL 2 years ago
wtf is an electronic engineer doing talking about mercury? lots of circuit boards up there i guess.
executehelenkeller 2 years ago 4
so i am guessing that you know more about mercury than he does? He did work for Nasa a organization specializing in space.
adam9920042004 1 year ago
wtf are you babbling about? A bachelors degree in electronic engineering=dont know shit about mercury. Do you also believe the guy who cleans the shitters for the astronauts is an expert on mercury too? He does work for nasa you know.
executehelenkeller 1 year ago 38
@adam9920042004 The fundie speaker is NOT a PhD in astrophysics. What makes you think he has some unique insights that that literally THOUSANDS OF BRILLIANT scientists who ARE PhDs. In this video...he makes DUMB statements that confound physics and biology...he is bogus no matter where he worked...given the gross scientific errors he makes in just these few minutes he could have just as easily been the Janitor at NASA!
DonSSanders 1 year ago
Why oh why do people in this day and age still
need to jump to the 'god hypothesis' to explain
every damned thing we don't understand yet? Even
as the scientific answers are unfolding right
before our very eyes every day?!
paulusmagirl 2 years ago 3
Thank you Andromedaswake for your work and efforts to help us, humans, get rid of faith based lies that have been holding us back from understanding our place in the universe.
tommytalks77 2 years ago 63
superb video very interesting. one suggestion though, turn down the music a little it distracts from the actual content of the video
Mike12784 2 years ago 3
haha a degree in Jesus must be worth less than a degree in liberal arts!
madgamer23 2 years ago 3
nah. As long as you avoid getting busted for fraud or tax evasion you can make a killing.
Nohname1 1 year ago
I love these videos.
Theory in general isn`t an all out explanation; it`s a hypothesis that acts as model. If Additional data is found to disprove a previous theory, then it is thrown out and a new theory fitting the evidence is adopted. This is the scientific method. Like you said in the video; gaps aren`t proof of a god, it`s just the standard scientific method.
Wanting to know more about the universe seems obvious. I pity creationalists who are content with ignorance .
bboykumo 2 years ago 4
(raises eyebrow) Smack My Bitch Up, dearie? You got style.
-BJ
darastarscream 2 years ago
Spike Psarris is just like Kirk Cameron and other creationists that claim to have been athiests. They were non religious. There is a huge difference.
Non religious-doesn't follow a religion. Makes no claim about the existence of Gods
Atheism-doesn't follow a religion. Claims (hopefully backed by scientific study, reason and logic) that there are no Gods, or the existence of Gods is unlikely
skitchdrews 2 years ago 4
no. atheism is commonly referred to as a LACK of belief in a deity. not saying there isnt one.
crappybass19 2 years ago 2
sorry, but what's the difference exactly? if you lack a belief in a deity, you'll happily say there isn't one.
SatyaVenugopal 2 years ago
The exact difference lies in the gnosticism of the beliefs ; A non-religious person is mostly unaware of religious ideas and concepts and thus ignores religious beliefs based on a lack of knowledge of it - an atheist knows of religious ideas, of concepts, and choses not to believe in them for various reasons - in other words, an atheist is a knowledgable disbeliever, whilst a non-religious person is unknowledgable as a disbeliever.
GronTheMighty 2 years ago
Lol... nuclear physics => Gordon Freeman
Kargoneth 2 years ago 2
Go Gordon, bring on Ep 3, what's keeping it?
FreindlyRanger 2 years ago
Is AndromedasWake also "NonStampCollector?" Just wondering - they have very similar voices.
xx13moons 2 years ago
No, definitely different people.
jkt589 2 years ago
The 3rd flyby of mercury by Messenger is coming on the 29th of september. Looks like we are about to find out even more about Mercury. :)
Ikaroos 2 years ago
Love this series Andromeda. I would love to see more!
LexxKitty 2 years ago
Gordon Freeman!?!
Good stuff!
andeve3 2 years ago
Why even address a man who doesn't even know what the theory of evolution describes.
arseymcpherson 2 years ago
I love the visuals you provide. Some of it is quite stunning! kudos!
101distribution 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
As much as I like to down the creationist with you, you have a problem.
The problem is Mercury being almost frozen..and Venus being volcanic & hot
Unless the solar system model is wrong.
Then the big bang model would be wrong.
The idea of what a universe is would also be wrong.
Bad science & astronomy give way to creationist having there way.
Now start over with the big bang.
If you make our solar system a planet colision for the big bang event everything start to make sense.
clnmyjts 2 years ago
Nasa photo`s of Mercury & our moon are to simular to dismiss.
Nasa`s photo`s of the outer gas planets also seem to have a distubing relationship to our inter planet with the prespective of a astroid belt seperating the inter and outer groups..
I can`t find a logical evolution pattern to the structure of our solar system as produced by Nasa photo`s.
Unless we have has some type of a planet impacted colision that started it all.
Is Nasa`s photo`s all a fraud and everything is wrong?
clnmyjts 2 years ago
Mercury is frozen ON THE NIGHT SIDE because the solar wind has blown away its atmosphere. It's SCORCHING on the day side. This is because, sans atmosphere, heat can't convect to the other side. Venus is much farther out, so the the solar wind has much less effect on the atmosphere and is further reduced by the EM field (if it still has one, but it does spin rather slowly to maintain it). The atmosphere is also held in by Venus' gravity and produces a greenhouse effect, heating the planet.
Dentarthurdent54 2 years ago
Venus sound like a early earth after the collision...and Mercury sound like the moon object that just hit a planet. that killed off the dinasours...LOL
It must be great to look back in time...LOL
clnmyjts 2 years ago
the creationist literally can't have his way with a rational person cause even IF (and they haven't been able on any level so far) they succeed to disprove anything that is not in any way evidence for their point - not in any - even if they somehow prove that ALL science is wrong that doesn't make them right ....
so their whole assertion is meaningles
symelian 2 years ago
I Personally don`t have a opinion on creation or evolution..
Why bother, both of them have so many flaws..
Here what I know as fact
You don`t have to believe in a God to fall under a dogmatic belief system.
Science is stuck in a dogmatic rut..
Astologers have not taken that quantum leap in their astrological observations Thus they are still dogmatic as to their belief systems.
If quantum theory can be proven & black whole are real.
We will be on the threshold of a whole new beginning.
clnmyjts 2 years ago
you can view it that way but u have to take in account that scientific dogma isn't literally dogma - it's changeable - whereas religious dogma is not only unchangeable but unquestionable - so i don't find it even similar...
well to each his own, as long as it doesn't encroach on my crap... :)
symelian 2 years ago
I agree that why I am challenging science and astrologers..
I read it takes a generation to pass before science dogma is ready to move ahead to the next level of understanding..
Quantum theory is that next step.
Religion have gone threw several changes as well.
Most of the christian Dogma is either Egyptian and or Krishna teachings..
I`ll be glad when all religions goes away..
Religion hold us back on a personal level of growth..
It take a lot longer for a faith to change it`s idea`s
clnmyjts 2 years ago
agreed
symelian 2 years ago
why do you keep talking about astrologers. they have nothing to do with science.
stevendurr 2 years ago
...Have you ever heard about a book called micobiology meets cosmology..
Everything in earth science could have a cosmic connection..
If quantum mechanics theory is proven we will of found out where the partical go when they disapear for that fraction of a second.
I just love the last sceen in the movie men in black 2
clnmyjts 2 years ago
No,you are not "challenging science and astrologers" or even science and astronomers.
But you are making about as much sense as an astrologer.
Science is not dogmatic either,it wouldn't be science if it was.
Rockster969 2 years ago
Science is not dogmatic either,it wouldn't be science if it was.
OH yeah...LOL
What do you call a new science technology that main stream scientist just won`t except as a discovered new science fact..
Dogmatic? or just fucking greed.....LOL
clnmyjts 2 years ago
Oh yeah,what new science technology has science not accepted then?
If it's HHO gas production don't even bother to reply.
Rockster969 2 years ago
my friend you are stuck in the OLD science...I won`t even bother to show you the new science if you haven`t been keeping up...
clnmyjts 2 years ago
No,come on,enlighten us then? I've seen those stoopid free energy vids in your channel.
If thats what you are going on about I'll dare you to post info cos I'll tear you a new one with simple physics.
Just cos its on TV don't make it true.
Rockster969 2 years ago
my channel is just to wake people up..It`s not a science channel..
If you like science why don`t you google frozen light
clnmyjts 2 years ago
ok saw that,it's interesting research but not 'new science' that old science doesnt recognise like you stated so put up or shut up.
Rockster969 2 years ago
Shut UP?
Well... WE must be touchie? You where most likely one of those guy in your past life that screamed; She a witch, She a witch, burn the witch..
You`ll really have to watch the Monty Python video skit. When ask why she was a witch the crowd had no good answer ..But gave a rather stupid answer. LIKE
WELL SHE LOOK LIKE A WITCH The judge ask what does a witch look like?
That`s when it get really fun. Watch the skit some time and ask yourself if that`s the way you to people at time.
clnmyjts 2 years ago
No such things as past lives retard an no I'm not touchy,put up or shut up is a common expression.
It means state your case or shut up and don't waste my time,and you didn't answer me(surprise.....not!)so fuck off and go learn some basic physics and stop wasting my time.
She doesn't look like a witch but you just look like shit,retard
Rockster969 2 years ago
You do a good job of proving my point...LOL
clnmyjts 2 years ago
Your are welcome to delude yourself but you havent even made a point.
Trying to debate with a fundie is like playing chess with a pigeon who knocks the pieces over and takes a crap on the board and then claims victory,just like you have just done.
Rockster969 2 years ago
I will ask a question..
Are we at the end of all advancments of science technologies?
I am going to ask another question..
Do you want the world to alway be in subjection to a greed commercial elites system?
And my third question is..
Do you know what real freedom is?
clnmyjts 2 years ago
42 Forty two
Rockster969 2 years ago 2
Alright, you've got the Answer. Now, what's the Question?
Dentarthurdent54 2 years ago
Yeah right mr 'free energy' has spoken.........shit.
C'mon genius,tell us about the new science old science won't accept? Magnetic motors?
HHO gas power?
Any other crap you care to mention,we are listening(and sniggering)
Rockster969 2 years ago
Only thing I don't enjoy about this series is that I can't read and listen at the same time. If I'm reading I miss the audio. If I'm listening I miss the written words. Damn my simple mind. Kudos otherwise!
robmarcreed 2 years ago
I just wet myself at the 3:00ish mark.
"In your Quantum Box... maybe" XD I'm getting that poster :p
AnimaRaptor 2 years ago
um in your quantum box.....maybe lmfao cats always know best i like how during the black plague it was made worse cause they killed off evil witch cats that ate all the plague rats score one for religion again
orkasteez 2 years ago
i agree spike doesnt know what he is talking about. but he like some creation scientists and some evolution/ "professional"scientists are not speaking on behalf of science but merely to combat each others own beliefs/religions.
FXGuitar 2 years ago
Fuck, you need a De- S -er.
ultimateinfinite 2 years ago
argg now all I can here is the SSSSSSSSSS
GabrielGrewal 2 years ago
i can't get over how awsome your disclaimer is
XD
ThisisStickman 2 years ago
Hahahaha the song is by Prodigy- Smack My Bitch Up.
mfaulkner12 2 years ago
Does the bible even mention mercury at all...? I mean, explicitly? Let me guess, no, the fucking earth was at the center. Duh.
arsenelupin123 2 years ago 3
Holy f'in shit... How Mercury EVOLVED?
Creationists really don't have a clue at all, and whilst this is not a new fact, the depth of their ignorance never ceases to amaze.
Shavarnarak 2 years ago 4
0:29 evolutonary astronomy ?WTF!
SoulStealer124 2 years ago 2
2:46
"nuclear physics" lol
MentalSentinel 2 years ago
2:47
Resonance Cascade!!!
weedman753 2 years ago
Wow, how do you manage to watch these creationist videos, without your head imploding.
thep3t4rd 2 years ago 5
what does biological evolution have to do with the physics of planet formation?
Bockatadi 2 years ago 2
nothing at all. for the creationist evolution = science in general.
Sp33dee0hsix 2 years ago
Nice vid! I really don't get the link between Mercury and evolution that is posed by this Spike figure. The main problem is ignorance, not because people have a religion, but because they fail to understand the subjects they're trying to disprove.
Vorkbom 2 years ago
I'm a real creationist and you are doing a good job getting the CRAP exposed, these guys drive me nuts... You have got these creationist who are not so brilliant scrutinizing your theories and in responce you scrutinize there scrutiny (and insult them). If your theories are true then proving them is the best way to debunk creationism..
jrhudspeth821 2 years ago
If you understood science, you'd know that theories can never be proven or verified absolutely. The scientific method can only partially verify, or falsify scientific theores. Creationism is not a scientific theory; not even a scientific hypothesis. I only need to falsify the statements of the creationist, as the burden of proof lies with him/her.
AndromedasWake 2 years ago
your haughty jibes denote frustration. it's not incumbent upon me to understand science (that's what scientists are for); no more than it is for you to know how to remove a brain tumor (that's what surgeons are for). in my world, science and God can coexist because i'm not a fundamentalist crackpot like the targets in your videos. i will keep my belief and never impose it on those who wish to believe otherwise. simply put, this means that it is up to you to PROVE me wrong. good debunking to you.
noodoo19 2 years ago
Obviously if someone is vastly more intelligent than you they're opinions are worth more than that of an uninformed or ignorant person. You've just admitted your inherent ignorance, which autamatically devalues any opinions you might have. In other words, "your world" is extremely negligible. In most cases you can't prove a negative, so the statement continues to devalue your opinion.
Sorry if I came off like a wanker, but I hate fallacies. See ya, m8.
Sh0nin 2 years ago
did a pinhead just say something to me? looking to curry favour with someone are we? i can just imagine you in the workplace... pain in the ass. i can't stand sycophants. do you get beat up a lot? oh... God bless, noodoo19.
noodoo19 2 years ago
-And let the childish insults commence. Just proves you haven't got anything smart to say. Fuck Andromeda, fuck him up his Nebula. I just had something I wanted to say.
Sh0nin 2 years ago
Btw I wasn't talking about Andromedas specificly when I answered you, if that's what you were thinking.
Sh0nin 2 years ago
May I ask, why do you need god?
beafman1 2 years ago
i've gotta tell ya that i find this ongoing arguement between the creationists and non to be childish and petty. what if you were to replace the creationists' (some, not all) strict adherence to the Bible's timelines with the belief that the origin of the universe is as modern cosmology states it is, but that God set all of THAT in motion? would there still be an arguement, or just a difference of opinion? how could/would science empirically refute that? arrogance = bad, on any side.
noodoo19 2 years ago
Science doesn't refute gods or magic. It merely has a track record for exposing anything that was ever attributed to a god as having a natural cause. Putting god as merely the prime mover is simply a god of the gaps argument. It's naive to think there can't be natural "causes" for our universe. Since science has systematically improved our knowledge, and god continuously been pushed back, I think it's perfectly fair to assume one method is better than the other.
AndromedasWake 2 years ago
forgive the 3 part response...
for the record, i am a believer in science and appreciate where it has taken humanity (the obvious misuses aside). at the same time however, i like the idea of God; not this malevolent entity who threatens with horrific punishment, but one who set up this truly sublime universe for us to discover; created it to follow the rules we continue to uncover and then got out of the way and allowed us free will.
noodoo19 2 years ago
(1/2) You might like the idea of a deity, but what use is that in understanding the Universe? If your idea can't be falsified, it's meaningless in understanding the natural world. But that's not the real issue. If you are willing to postulate supernatural creation, you've violated the philosophy of naturalism, and have no good reason not to simply say that YEC is true, and that the Universe was supernaturally created to look old. Your only reason for believing otherwise is because you *like* the
AndromedasWake 2 years ago 2
(2/2) idea of a deity who isn't malevolent, but kind. You haven't infered anything about said deity, but rather just applied that characteristic to it yourself. Why? Because you *like* it. This method for understanding things (ie. making untestible things up and applying characteristics to them) is very inferior to the scientific method. Saying "Perhaps he did it this way.." is just mindless, unfalsifiable speculation. No better than Russel's teapot. This mysticism is always trumped by science.
AndromedasWake 2 years ago 3
That is amazing how you can infer my entire view of the universe from a comment i made on your video. that is mystic. Sorry If you don't like my choice of wording. You can replace "prove" with "Further validate to the point that there is no evidence against it." Your rignt it's not fair that the burden of prof is with science and not creationism. Like you said creationism isn't a science. If god created the universe don't you think it mignt be the only way to understand the universe
jrhudspeth821 2 years ago
When a theory is proven (yes, none have) they become scientific fact. philoshophically thinking: if it is true it can't be proven wrong. Right! Accept creationist theories as a means of futher validating your own theories by debunking them. thats what im saying. Don't be a butt hurt bitch about it.
You haved debunked what I had thought were good creationist argument in astronomy. good job! Please keep making videos.
jrhudspeth821 2 years ago