@BadBoriBoy Set is used when someone has pocket pairs and hit the board, only ONE individual can hit a Set.
Trips is used when TWO person holds the same card and the board has two of the same card. Thus, both players made a TRIP. In poker terms that is how it is categorized to avoid confusion.
@HBRevive Trips are when its a paired board and you hit one of the paired cards... it doesnt matter if both players hit the paired board or not. Statement about sets is correct
How do you figure out the percentage in your head like that? How can you calculate 14% in your head there. So there there was 6 outs for Antonius so...
@niknik80fig Or multiply your outs x 4 after the flop or x2 after the turn. So 6 outs x2 means an approximate 12% chance of Antonius hitting his outs on the river.
Hello guys, well im here to tell you guys that im throwing out a challenge out there for anyone who likes to make videos. The challenge is to see who can make the best gambler music video, please, please check out my channel and watch the video called The Ultimate Gambler Music Video. TAKE THE CHALLENGE!!. Watch the video for deatil, and after you have made the video contact me, thanks. Are you up for the challenge?
Hey was up guys, I just made a video dedicated to Patrik Antonius, go check it out, subscribe, and rate...the video still needs some work but i'll be coming out with new projects in the near future, thank you. Just click on my name, go to my page and check out the video i made called Patrik Antonius The God...check it out
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I find Laak to be more of an asshole every time I see him. FFS don't touch PA during a hand like a knucklehead. Saying stuff like "this is what 14% feels like" give me a break. Glad the river was a king.
i think jennifer liked the flop. the river - not so much. the hand that akdons3 is talking about can be found on youtube. ivey's reaction is hilarious
do you mean pre-flop or post-flop? I strongly diasagree that all in pre flop can't be a bad beat. If you are about a 50 percent favourite (ex: AA vs. JJ) andd JJ beats you after both players go all in pre-flop, than this is definitely a bad beat.
I didn't mean 50/50, I meant about 50-60 more percent-points than your opponent (the AA vs JJ situation for example. AND you can have your opinion, but I strongly believe that if you are a 81% to 19% favourite at any point in the hand, then it's a bad beat if you don't win. There are degrees of bad beats you know, maybe it's not a massive bad beat but it still is a bad beat.
Based on the definition of a bad beat, I would say yes it is. Anytime you're a monster favourite at any point in the hand, and you are drawn-out on, it's a bad beat. Even if you're beat by a hand that was the best hand pre-flop.
jennifer tilly is a dumb fuck. Remember the hand where she checked it the whole way through with Patrick antonius when she flopped a set of jacks and rivered a full house and thought patrick had POCKET KINGS LMAO. phil iveys face was priceless
OMG that Poker after dark moment was CLASSIC. You could see her breasts bounce up and down cause she was so nervous. If he does have pocket K's, you have to pay him off and just accept the horrible beat (you can't get scared to bet in that situation). That's just weak poker.
@laffizzle that because he isnt a cocky american.. europeans are either cool tempered or they will very aggresive.. luckily antonius is a cool tempered guy
I don't know if you mean you think it's to hi or to low. Rule of thumb to find percentage. Multiply how many outs you have on the turn by 2 or on the flop by 4 to determine your chances of winnings. He had 6 outs 6x2=12. That's why Laak said 12 Percent.
It's better to do number of outs in comparison to the remaining cards: So 6 of 45 which is exactly 7.5 to one. The reason this is better is that you can compare it directly to the pot odds. Tip time for everyone who watches this vid.
why'd you wanna calculate your odds like that. it would only make sense if you knew what your opponents cards were. 4,3*outs for 2 cards to come and 2,1*outs when one cards is to come is the most accurate way. I mean if you have an exceptional read you could do 4,5 and 2,3 instead. anyway your method doesn't work. 17*4 -2 =66 4,5*17=76,5 this is assuming you have 17 outs and you KNOW what your opponents cards are. however you can do 4*outs + ½*outs.
I actually dislike Laak.... I think he´s behaviour isn´t natural, but more a show. I like Antonius, one of the best players erver!
ThomasDelPiero 2 days ago
i think gamikav was talking about when jen checked back a boat i cant remember who against but phil iveys face said it all
webo3000 1 month ago
if jen was playing that she would of insta folded obviously haha
silentsniper125 4 months ago
3:46 Jennifer Titty's face when she backed the wrong hunk.
showmeyourtonsils 6 months ago
myg0t!
ElectronicStuff4Free 6 months ago
fuck on your ass bitch first learn how to play with a full house hand
mustwo 7 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
OVER $1000 OF FREEROLLS A DAY ON HIGHPULSE POKER
JOIN TODAY USING CODE POKERCHIPS
~~~ NO DEPOSIT REQUIRED~~~
champions20000009 8 months ago
LOL that is tilly's favorite hand
gaminkalv 8 months ago 2
@gaminkalv you mean Phil's?
Drecon84 7 months ago
@gaminkalv laughed so hard
mzfckr993 5 months ago
3:37 Antonius shows his happy face for getting trip kings
MrMillsms 1 year ago 4
@MrMillsms set kings not trips
HBRevive 11 months ago
@HBRevive : A set of kings is trips. The technical term is 3 of a kind. They all mean the same thing.
BadBoriBoy 9 months ago
@BadBoriBoy Set is used when someone has pocket pairs and hit the board, only ONE individual can hit a Set.
Trips is used when TWO person holds the same card and the board has two of the same card. Thus, both players made a TRIP. In poker terms that is how it is categorized to avoid confusion.
HBRevive 9 months ago
@HBRevive : True, nice 1....but I have heard player use both terms when they have both.
BadBoriBoy 9 months ago
@HBRevive Trips are when its a paired board and you hit one of the paired cards... it doesnt matter if both players hit the paired board or not. Statement about sets is correct
420lefebvre 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if you play with real money on pokerstars go to onlinepokercrack . com
j753k 1 year ago
the ultimate pokerplayer definately must have the sportmanship of phil laak :)
MusclesfromB 1 year ago
" YES x100" Hahaha , yes on your ass!
txsholdem 1 year ago
How do you figure out the percentage in your head like that? How can you calculate 14% in your head there. So there there was 6 outs for Antonius so...
jedichris8 1 year ago
@jedichris8 u see how many outs u can win with, and divide by how many cards are left in the deck. 6/44 = 14%
niknik80fig 1 year ago
@niknik80fig Or multiply your outs x 4 after the flop or x2 after the turn. So 6 outs x2 means an approximate 12% chance of Antonius hitting his outs on the river.
nevmiles 9 months ago
"You backed the wrong hunk, sweetheart!"
JohnLeeMD 1 year ago
yes lon.... yes.
Larky215 1 year ago 2
Kathy Liebert is sooooo fucking hot.
bannedagainfromutube 1 year ago 7
@bannedagainfromutube lmao...i put thumbs up just for fun!!
marcosnl281 1 year ago
HAHAHA LAAKS GIRL!!
aikakausi 1 year ago
SICK
FILIPeeeK 1 year ago
Heh, gotta love the guy ^^
gogi1000 1 year ago
shut the fuck up tilly
spunkeecheese 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hello guys, well im here to tell you guys that im throwing out a challenge out there for anyone who likes to make videos. The challenge is to see who can make the best gambler music video, please, please check out my channel and watch the video called The Ultimate Gambler Music Video. TAKE THE CHALLENGE!!. Watch the video for deatil, and after you have made the video contact me, thanks. Are you up for the challenge?
iHannibal9216 1 year ago
i like how phil laak is always so proud that he can use the rule of thump 2x 6 outs = 12%
patatepowa 1 year ago
@patatepowa when did he say he was proud that he could use the rule of *thumb..i must have missed it
treezX 1 year ago
@patatepowa Ahahaha your so fail !!!!!!!!!!!!
yanick203 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey was up guys, I just made a video dedicated to Patrik Antonius, go check it out, subscribe, and rate...the video still needs some work but i'll be coming out with new projects in the near future, thank you. Just click on my name, go to my page and check out the video i made called Patrik Antonius The God...check it out
iHannibal9216 1 year ago
fuck off laak and the magician makes me yawn
tommy444able 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I find Laak to be more of an asshole every time I see him. FFS don't touch PA during a hand like a knucklehead. Saying stuff like "this is what 14% feels like" give me a break. Glad the river was a king.
MrGnomemeat 2 years ago
lmao yes lon yes
Mackattack2294 2 years ago
"You've lost more money with pocket JJ than any other hand Lon" jajaja
Cheshario 2 years ago
That Patrik Anter is pretty good!
CP3Hornetfan21 2 years ago
i think jennifer liked the flop. the river - not so much. the hand that akdons3 is talking about can be found on youtube. ivey's reaction is hilarious
spmrulez 2 years ago
patrik has a perfect tan.
Faygo069 2 years ago
phil lark is funniest of them all.
weert6666 2 years ago
haha first the jack on the flop, then a king on the river! that was awesome!
PlayaplayaAP 2 years ago 2
this is not a bad beat....
Xzyrius 2 years ago 3
all in pf is never a bad beat
res813 2 years ago
do you mean pre-flop or post-flop? I strongly diasagree that all in pre flop can't be a bad beat. If you are about a 50 percent favourite (ex: AA vs. JJ) andd JJ beats you after both players go all in pre-flop, than this is definitely a bad beat.
assmane999 2 years ago
Well, 50-50 favors no side. Aces (81%) versus Jacks (19%) is not a bad beat. Jacks win 1 out of 5 times
res813 2 years ago
I didn't mean 50/50, I meant about 50-60 more percent-points than your opponent (the AA vs JJ situation for example. AND you can have your opinion, but I strongly believe that if you are a 81% to 19% favourite at any point in the hand, then it's a bad beat if you don't win. There are degrees of bad beats you know, maybe it's not a massive bad beat but it still is a bad beat.
assmane999 2 years ago
Based on the definition of a bad beat, I would say yes it is. Anytime you're a monster favourite at any point in the hand, and you are drawn-out on, it's a bad beat. Even if you're beat by a hand that was the best hand pre-flop.
assmane999 2 years ago
yes yes yes, yo yes i said yes
selfis0007 2 years ago
Laak is a class act.
6969ok69 2 years ago
Much respect to Laak for taking this beat so well.
IIIIIIII 2 years ago 4
how is this a beat?
ml497 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
YEAAAAHHHHH!!!! Laak is a schizophrenic..unbearable man!!!! GO patrick!!! yeeeesssssss
patoschi280503 2 years ago
jennifer tilly is a dumb fuck. Remember the hand where she checked it the whole way through with Patrick antonius when she flopped a set of jacks and rivered a full house and thought patrick had POCKET KINGS LMAO. phil iveys face was priceless
akdons3 2 years ago 4
I LOVED that clip XDD
SuperChuck3 2 years ago
OMG that Poker after dark moment was CLASSIC. You could see her breasts bounce up and down cause she was so nervous. If he does have pocket K's, you have to pay him off and just accept the horrible beat (you can't get scared to bet in that situation). That's just weak poker.
assmane999 2 years ago
Phil Laak owns, he is so funny and a good player!
ideacomp 2 years ago
that how tilly sounds in bed?
krazyazn208 2 years ago 11
LOL when the K came up patrik just sat there and went "oh did i win, cool"....
reubenw59 2 years ago
Laak is like a little kid, must been raised in a smooth environment. It's nice to see IMO. A little fun in a stressful game.
yougotknockdown 2 years ago 7
I'm pretty sure he has ADHD. How else could you explain his behaviour?
assmane999 2 years ago
what is ADHD ???!!
yougotknockdown 2 years ago
Attention deficit Hyper Disorder
assmane999 2 years ago
Hi assmane999. Nice said man.
DJBouncey 2 years ago
phil laak has is hilarious most of the time hes like an emotional wreck at the table
andos8888 2 years ago 4
She looks live an evil gnome here...
sephizinho 2 years ago 3
Antonius is so cool tempered
laffizzle 2 years ago 46
@laffizzle that because he isnt a cocky american.. europeans are either cool tempered or they will very aggresive.. luckily antonius is a cool tempered guy
reubenw59 1 year ago
I'd like to make jennifer tilly scream YES YES YES in a different situation ¬_¬
ferios2 2 years ago 88
just hearing her scream it is ok
ZawEatsFish 2 years ago
@ferios2 thats exacly was I was saying to my brother while watching this video hahaha
fradet8 1 year ago
@ferios2 ohhh, sex...
tedwilli9 10 months ago
Comment removed
PlayaplayaAP 2 years ago
Comment removed
PlayaplayaAP 2 years ago
How is it 14%? His outs were KKQQQQ...
tjd07x 2 years ago
13.7% according to poker academy :)
emorom 2 years ago
I don't know if you mean you think it's to hi or to low. Rule of thumb to find percentage. Multiply how many outs you have on the turn by 2 or on the flop by 4 to determine your chances of winnings. He had 6 outs 6x2=12. That's why Laak said 12 Percent.
Gforcebond 2 years ago
youre an idiot, the video said his % was 14 but I also calculated 12 so thats why I was questioning it. Watch the vid before you talk please thanks.
tjd07x 2 years ago
I actually do it like this:
2 Cards to come: Outs x 4 - 2
1 Card to come: Outs x 2 + 2
This is about right.
But I'm changing the way I do it right now.
It's better to do number of outs in comparison to the remaining cards: So 6 of 45 which is exactly 7.5 to one. The reason this is better is that you can compare it directly to the pot odds. Tip time for everyone who watches this vid.
kungfuseadog 2 years ago
why'd you wanna calculate your odds like that. it would only make sense if you knew what your opponents cards were. 4,3*outs for 2 cards to come and 2,1*outs when one cards is to come is the most accurate way. I mean if you have an exceptional read you could do 4,5 and 2,3 instead. anyway your method doesn't work. 17*4 -2 =66 4,5*17=76,5 this is assuming you have 17 outs and you KNOW what your opponents cards are. however you can do 4*outs + ½*outs.
nejtilsvampe 2 years ago
actually 6 outs - with a possible 44 cards to come, so 6/44~ 14%
evertonian555 2 years ago