F1 is boring these days, with DRS and KERS it isn't made any more exciting either. It's all about technology, who's got the fastest car and who can come up with the best pit stop strategy. Take a look at Vettel, he makes the whole thing boring since his car is faster than anyone else and their team probably has the fastest pit stops. He gets there, the car helps him smash everyone to get to the front of the grid, then races infront of everyone the whole race, which takes hardly any skill at all.
@niteterror2k7 Despite the fact that he set his car on pole position at Hungary and Suzuka despite the McLaren being the quicker car.
F1 has always been about the cars. Look at '92. Mansell's williams were over a second a lap quicker then the rest for the whole season. Same story with Ayrton Senna's McLaren in '88. The gaps were much larger back then. Today the gap between the cars are only a few tenths.
@5K4L4 Well you don't know if Alonso was either, do you? After the race Whitmarsh said the reason why Hamilton had to slow down at the end was because he was going faster than expected at the start when this action took place.
F1 has become a farce! If you suck at overtaking others, all you have to do is wait for the DRS zone, where the driver in front becomes a sitting duck! FIA clearly wanted to level things between real racers and average drivers who now come across as fantastic overtakers. What a farce! Compare these overtakes with the ones Hamilton and Montoya used to do before this cheating device was introduced. Look back at what Lewis did in China and Germany. Overtakes without DRS! That was real racing!!
@CO0L90 Yeah, you're right. But even having been better this year, I think that HAM is better than BUT, anyway every person can think a different thing because both of them are a good drivers
@CO0L90 Button is not even in the same league as Hamilton and Alonso, let alone being better. Yes, he´s had his best season ever in contrast with Lewis´worst season ever, but that doesn´t mean Button is better. Massa beat Raikkonen for two seasons in a row, does that mean that he´s better than Raikkonen??
@terkmadugga Well, Massa was way ahead of Raikkonen in the drivers Championship before the accident, there´s no doubt he would have finished the season with more points then Raikkonen if it wasn´t for the accident. That´s why Ferrari chose to keep Massa instead of Raikkonen.
@Euclides287 Well first off you should have clarified. You can't just take half a season to be a representation of a whole season. Just because someone starts a season strongly or badly, doesn't ever mean that they will carry on that trend throughout the whole season. Schumacher started his season terribly in 2006, but in the second half was undoubtedly the fastest. And to say Raikkonen left because of that was incorrect. HE wanted to leave.
@terkmadugga - Schumacher started the 2006 season terribly? In the first half of 2006 he finished on the podium in all but 2 races. How is that "terrible'? And Raikkonen was sacked because he wasn't good enough, Massa beat him on wins, poles, and points in their time together at ferrari even though Massa's salary was 5 times less than what Kimi was getting paid. That's frankly embarrassing. Kimi didn't choose to leave, he was paid so he could leave(i.e fired).
@Anime998877 Ok, bad example. All I'm saying is Massa didn't ever beat Raikkonen 2 seasons in a row. You can't count half a season as a full representation of a driver's entire season.
@terkmadugga And following from that, sorry for saying Schumacher had a bad first half of '06. But what I meant to say was that if he had carried on the whole season like he did the first half, he wouldn't have been anywhere near the championship as he was when he upped his game in the second half. Just trying to say you can't look at one half of a season and know for sure who's going to win the WDC.
@terkmadugga - Schumacher didn't up his game in the 2nd half of 2006, the car did. When the car finally became up to par Schumacher was able to win more than half the races in the 2nd half of the year but in the first half renault were way too quick to do anything about it.
@Anime998877 Raikkonen was ignored by Ferrari after Todt left, Not Kimi's fault that italians are assholes, Look at what happened after Massa was hurt, They had no choice but to listen to him, and look what happened, regular podiums and even a race win. In a F60, hell even the enginers couldn't beleive what Kimi got out of that pice of tin
@8911145533 - Even in 2007 when Todt was still in the team, Massa was consistently a match for Raikkonen and led Raikkonen in the championship for most of the year despite having to drive 3 races from the back of the grid and being dsq in canada until his mechanical failure at monza, which put him virtually out of the championship and ferrari favoured kimi from then on. Raikkonen clearly wasn't good enough, Alonso has come to ferrari and made massa his puppet, raikkonen could never do that.
@Anime998877 Because Massa isn't allowed to be faster than Alonso, None of the Ferraris Kimi drove where built to fit his driving style, way to much understeering. Something that Massa enjoys and Kimi hates. THere was no nr 1 driver when Kimi was at Ferrari either, besides Massa was outperformed regulay by Raikkonen in 2007, and despite his dissapointing season in 2008 Massa wasnt destroying him. Look what Kimi did to Montoya for example, a driver i rate higher than Massa.
@8911145533 - I find it hilarious that you say the ferraris from 2007-2008 didn't suit Kimi but conveniently ignore that the 2005 mclaren didn't suit Montoya. Raikkonen had no complaints about the 2007 ferrari, his only complaints were with the 2008 one. In 2007, kimi's first year at ferrari Massa and Raikkonen were evenly matched, and raikkonen ended up winning because after italy he was favoured. In 2010, alonso's first year at ferrari. Alonso scored double Massa's points. End of story.
@8911145533 - Because he complained all year about it. He had to add several different parts to attempt to make the car more understeery.
Look, I don't think Montoya's better than Kimi, he's not. Kimi was clearly the better driver at mclaren as the results show from 05-06. And at ferrari as the results show Massa had a slight edge on Raikkonen with more wins, poles, and points from the start of 2007 to Hungary 2009.
Here's the reasoning, Vettel is the fastest driver right now, Hamilton is a crash kid, and Alonso is at his best when he has a bad car and has to drag it around like 2011.
@nitroboost8765 Weren't you paying attention in the last race at Korea when 5 cars were nose to tail in the last few laps? Hamilton defended against a faster Webber which allowed Button, Alonso and Massa to catch up.
@AccordGTR I did, that's been about the only successful defensive drive all season by anybody, all the rest having been in Monaco...And nobody had a tyre advantage, like Alonso did here...A good overtake, but DRS had a huge role to play.
@nitroboost8765 Completely agree. The worst thing about it is that there are no big surprises anymore. All the DRS does is just filter the quick cars to the front. Means that no matter how good a performance from a driver in a Mercedes, Sauber, Force India etc they cannot defend themselves from a car with a significant performance advantage. With these Pirelli tyres it's DRS is completely uneccessary.
@GeoffLe0pard Yeah, it took a spirited drive from lewis Hamilton in Korea just to hold off the DRS powered cars behind, not to mention harvesting KERS for the entire lap just to use it on the straight.
@nitroboost8765 kinda ironic your user name is nitro boost lol, I feel like F1 is just one step away from some that stupid, but yeah I agree enough with this press x to pass bullshit
@fistacuff56 Yeah lol, don't let my user name fool you, I'm a motor racing purist...I disagree with the concept of DRS, KERS is acceptable considering both drivers can use it wherever he wishes to on the circuit.
I like this moving camera so damn much!
TheHidalgo99 2 weeks ago
he makes that overtake look very easy
GabrielArapiraca 3 weeks ago
DRS should be enabled only on boring tracks such as Abu Dhabi, Bahrein, Barcelona or Hungaroring !
raphaelchekroun 1 month ago
look at the differences in speed 0:15
344Marek 2 months ago
now we need to push...box the end of this lap..xD
DraganTanasic 2 months ago
Alonso is easily the best driver on the grid
SonOfTheRightHand29 2 months ago 2
the camera angles at silverstone were so sick
jazzykoenig 3 months ago
F1 is boring these days, with DRS and KERS it isn't made any more exciting either. It's all about technology, who's got the fastest car and who can come up with the best pit stop strategy. Take a look at Vettel, he makes the whole thing boring since his car is faster than anyone else and their team probably has the fastest pit stops. He gets there, the car helps him smash everyone to get to the front of the grid, then races infront of everyone the whole race, which takes hardly any skill at all.
niteterror2k7 3 months ago
@niteterror2k7 Despite the fact that he set his car on pole position at Hungary and Suzuka despite the McLaren being the quicker car.
F1 has always been about the cars. Look at '92. Mansell's williams were over a second a lap quicker then the rest for the whole season. Same story with Ayrton Senna's McLaren in '88. The gaps were much larger back then. Today the gap between the cars are only a few tenths.
dude2106 2 months ago
How do they get these camera angles....sick!
sinister0083 3 months ago 2
@sinister0083 They use a camera on a wire system
Master1906 1 month ago
Comment removed
sinister0083 3 months ago
starting at 0.15 sec of the video great camera coverage !!!
maximusmku 3 months ago
U do know Lewis had to reduce engine map to save fuel?.
TheBlender3dJedi 3 months ago
@TheBlender3dJedi This was long before he had to save fuel.
supercas46 3 months ago
@supercas46 Martin Whitmarsh told you? Nobody from us (fans) know that.
5K4L4 3 months ago
@5K4L4 Well you don't know if Alonso was either, do you? After the race Whitmarsh said the reason why Hamilton had to slow down at the end was because he was going faster than expected at the start when this action took place.
supercas46 3 months ago
Grande Alonso
nerto1991 3 months ago
grande alonso!!!!
apostolhs1995 3 months ago
F1 has become a farce! If you suck at overtaking others, all you have to do is wait for the DRS zone, where the driver in front becomes a sitting duck! FIA clearly wanted to level things between real racers and average drivers who now come across as fantastic overtakers. What a farce! Compare these overtakes with the ones Hamilton and Montoya used to do before this cheating device was introduced. Look back at what Lewis did in China and Germany. Overtakes without DRS! That was real racing!!
Euclides287 3 months ago 2
Give them a Red Bull and we will see who's better!! Vettel, Hamilton or Alonso :)
Straatmaan 4 months ago 56
@Straatmaan Alonso of course!! To bad Kimi is no longer in F1!! Give him a red bull car and than u'll see :))
GORANJAMES2 4 months ago 2
@GORANJAMES2 I agree Hamilton is just a nervous jerk
Alberto19951995 3 months ago
@Straatmaan Kubica :)
ocebeziomek 4 months ago
@Straatmaan Alonso !!
guitarkayschi139 3 months ago
@Straatmaan Alonso ofc
TheV12ferrari 3 months ago
@Straatmaan Alonso, of course!!!!!
antreas1986i 3 months ago
@Straatmaan
1. alonso
2. hamilton
3. vettel
in a red bull
Naganiet200 3 months ago 8
@Straatmaan 1º ALO 2º HAM 3º VET
rOdRiIi69 2 months ago 5
@rOdRiIi69 button proved to be better than hamilton this year
CO0L90 2 months ago
@CO0L90 Yeah, you're right. But even having been better this year, I think that HAM is better than BUT, anyway every person can think a different thing because both of them are a good drivers
rOdRiIi69 2 months ago
@CO0L90 but hamilton beat him 2010 season and button beat him 2011 season so what is the fuss about.
4evaMclarenf1 2 months ago
@CO0L90 Button is not even in the same league as Hamilton and Alonso, let alone being better. Yes, he´s had his best season ever in contrast with Lewis´worst season ever, but that doesn´t mean Button is better. Massa beat Raikkonen for two seasons in a row, does that mean that he´s better than Raikkonen??
Euclides287 1 month ago
@Euclides287 When did Massa beat Raikkonen 2 seasons in a row?
terkmadugga 1 week ago
@terkmadugga Massa beat Raikkonen in 2008 and 2009.
Euclides287 1 week ago
@Euclides287 In 2009, Massa had his crash. Which obviously meant Raikkonen got more points. So, no, Massa didn't beat Raikkonen 2 seasons in a row.
terkmadugga 1 week ago
@terkmadugga Well, Massa was way ahead of Raikkonen in the drivers Championship before the accident, there´s no doubt he would have finished the season with more points then Raikkonen if it wasn´t for the accident. That´s why Ferrari chose to keep Massa instead of Raikkonen.
Euclides287 1 week ago
@Euclides287 Well first off you should have clarified. You can't just take half a season to be a representation of a whole season. Just because someone starts a season strongly or badly, doesn't ever mean that they will carry on that trend throughout the whole season. Schumacher started his season terribly in 2006, but in the second half was undoubtedly the fastest. And to say Raikkonen left because of that was incorrect. HE wanted to leave.
terkmadugga 1 week ago
@terkmadugga - Schumacher started the 2006 season terribly? In the first half of 2006 he finished on the podium in all but 2 races. How is that "terrible'? And Raikkonen was sacked because he wasn't good enough, Massa beat him on wins, poles, and points in their time together at ferrari even though Massa's salary was 5 times less than what Kimi was getting paid. That's frankly embarrassing. Kimi didn't choose to leave, he was paid so he could leave(i.e fired).
Anime998877 1 week ago
@Anime998877 Ok, bad example. All I'm saying is Massa didn't ever beat Raikkonen 2 seasons in a row. You can't count half a season as a full representation of a driver's entire season.
terkmadugga 1 week ago
@terkmadugga And following from that, sorry for saying Schumacher had a bad first half of '06. But what I meant to say was that if he had carried on the whole season like he did the first half, he wouldn't have been anywhere near the championship as he was when he upped his game in the second half. Just trying to say you can't look at one half of a season and know for sure who's going to win the WDC.
terkmadugga 1 week ago
@terkmadugga - Schumacher didn't up his game in the 2nd half of 2006, the car did. When the car finally became up to par Schumacher was able to win more than half the races in the 2nd half of the year but in the first half renault were way too quick to do anything about it.
Anime998877 1 week ago
@Anime998877 Raikkonen was ignored by Ferrari after Todt left, Not Kimi's fault that italians are assholes, Look at what happened after Massa was hurt, They had no choice but to listen to him, and look what happened, regular podiums and even a race win. In a F60, hell even the enginers couldn't beleive what Kimi got out of that pice of tin
8911145533 1 week ago
@8911145533 - Even in 2007 when Todt was still in the team, Massa was consistently a match for Raikkonen and led Raikkonen in the championship for most of the year despite having to drive 3 races from the back of the grid and being dsq in canada until his mechanical failure at monza, which put him virtually out of the championship and ferrari favoured kimi from then on. Raikkonen clearly wasn't good enough, Alonso has come to ferrari and made massa his puppet, raikkonen could never do that.
Anime998877 1 week ago
@Anime998877 Because Massa isn't allowed to be faster than Alonso, None of the Ferraris Kimi drove where built to fit his driving style, way to much understeering. Something that Massa enjoys and Kimi hates. THere was no nr 1 driver when Kimi was at Ferrari either, besides Massa was outperformed regulay by Raikkonen in 2007, and despite his dissapointing season in 2008 Massa wasnt destroying him. Look what Kimi did to Montoya for example, a driver i rate higher than Massa.
8911145533 1 week ago
@8911145533 - I find it hilarious that you say the ferraris from 2007-2008 didn't suit Kimi but conveniently ignore that the 2005 mclaren didn't suit Montoya. Raikkonen had no complaints about the 2007 ferrari, his only complaints were with the 2008 one. In 2007, kimi's first year at ferrari Massa and Raikkonen were evenly matched, and raikkonen ended up winning because after italy he was favoured. In 2010, alonso's first year at ferrari. Alonso scored double Massa's points. End of story.
Anime998877 1 week ago
@Anime998877 And how do you know that that car didn't fit Montoya?
8911145533 6 days ago
@8911145533 - Because he complained all year about it. He had to add several different parts to attempt to make the car more understeery.
Look, I don't think Montoya's better than Kimi, he's not. Kimi was clearly the better driver at mclaren as the results show from 05-06. And at ferrari as the results show Massa had a slight edge on Raikkonen with more wins, poles, and points from the start of 2007 to Hungary 2009.
Anime998877 6 days ago
@Straatmaan
1. Alonso
2. Hamilton
3. Vettel
Naganiet200 1 month ago
@Straatmaan Vettel, Hamilton, Alonso.
Here's the reasoning, Vettel is the fastest driver right now, Hamilton is a crash kid, and Alonso is at his best when he has a bad car and has to drag it around like 2011.
xshx19 1 month ago
@Straatmaan give them a mclaren
RogerL94 1 month ago
@Straatmaan obviously hamilton
slmazadza 2 weeks ago
@Straatmaan Give Kimi that Red Bull and he will destroy all of them
8911145533 1 week ago
I loathe DRS, defending has been effectively thrown out of the window now.
nitroboost8765 4 months ago 29
@nitroboost8765 I totally agree with you. Its not racing anymore :(
LeFonzi 4 months ago in playlist Liked
@LeFonzi Yep, no denying it was a good drive by Alonso at Silverstone, but nobody can defend at all these days...
nitroboost8765 4 months ago
@nitroboost8765 Weren't you paying attention in the last race at Korea when 5 cars were nose to tail in the last few laps? Hamilton defended against a faster Webber which allowed Button, Alonso and Massa to catch up.
AccordGTR 4 months ago
@AccordGTR I did, that's been about the only successful defensive drive all season by anybody, all the rest having been in Monaco...And nobody had a tyre advantage, like Alonso did here...A good overtake, but DRS had a huge role to play.
nitroboost8765 4 months ago
@nitroboost8765 Completely agree. The worst thing about it is that there are no big surprises anymore. All the DRS does is just filter the quick cars to the front. Means that no matter how good a performance from a driver in a Mercedes, Sauber, Force India etc they cannot defend themselves from a car with a significant performance advantage. With these Pirelli tyres it's DRS is completely uneccessary.
GeoffLe0pard 4 months ago
@GeoffLe0pard Yeah, it took a spirited drive from lewis Hamilton in Korea just to hold off the DRS powered cars behind, not to mention harvesting KERS for the entire lap just to use it on the straight.
nitroboost8765 4 months ago
@nitroboost8765 Schumacher at Monza showed that you are not right : )
brzezio96 3 months ago
@brzezio96 That's because the Mercedes' has a very impressive straight line speed...And Schumacher is Schumacher.
nitroboost8765 3 months ago
@nitroboost8765 RBR also had very low speed in comparison with Ferrari but Vettel could ovetake Alonso ; ) and Button also could overtake Schumacher
brzezio96 3 months ago
@brzezio96 The RBR is a very, very aerodynamically efficient car, I think you probably know that...Anyway, your point is?
nitroboost8765 3 months ago
@nitroboost8765 Hmmm. I'm not sure xD
brzezio96 3 months ago
@brzezio96 Lol, thought as much...I was quite confused myself
nitroboost8765 3 months ago
@nitroboost8765 kinda ironic your user name is nitro boost lol, I feel like F1 is just one step away from some that stupid, but yeah I agree enough with this press x to pass bullshit
fistacuff56 2 months ago
@fistacuff56 Yeah lol, don't let my user name fool you, I'm a motor racing purist...I disagree with the concept of DRS, KERS is acceptable considering both drivers can use it wherever he wishes to on the circuit.
nitroboost8765 2 months ago
@nitroboost8765 That happened before then, with the swerving regulations. DRS is just a continuation.
Catchaontheflipsyde 2 weeks ago