Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (196)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • we must watch out for these kafirs , they work for iblis, see how they deceive ppl. trying to take the true believers to jahannam with them.

  • xtians tell you to risk going to hell forever based on the bible. so in return they shud atleast drink poison like the bible says. cant they risk that , after all you risk ur soul and they wont risk just ther lives. cos they know theyll die. seen the excuse . no1 is testing god. we are testing THE XTIAN BELIEVER as the bible says.god wunt bother saying that verse , if it wasnt for testing right. so you see how the xtians are evil deceivers,,,, they will take u to hell 4ever.......

  • xtians have legalised SATAN worshippers , ans witches of satan in america . but they dont say owt about satan lovers. cos they are also controlled by satan. they ignore all the things banned by god, like alcohol, pig meat, gays, gambling ect they directly do the opposite of the commandments, they have sex with animals for money, have sex in streets with strangers live like swine , and then they say we deserve heaven. for wot living like swine

  • bible says earth is flat , atleast twice, it says earth is 6000yrs old has 4CORNERS, and get this light called DAY was created 2days before the SUN and stars. bible says DONT PRAY TO GOD, dont do good deeds theyre worthless. insults god loads of times like in judges 1;19 god and judah ran away cos they wer DEFEATED by men in iron chariots, god will shave ppl legs with a razor. god has women killed and raped. babies smashed on rocks, unborn killed , ect ect satan talks like this.........

  • Google Translate is not perfect!

  • Most of these posts have very bad English, punctuation and spelling. Why not use Microsoft Word and then paste it into your Web Browser, then at least the children won’t be learning bad English as well..

  • CONTRADICTIONS in quran-Is allah

    merciful ? YES-1,1:3/1,36/2,37/2,54/2,128­/2,143/2,160/2,173/2,182/2,192­/2,218 vs

    NO-2,7/2,17/4,56/4,168:9/5,33/­7,50 Does allah make distinctions between his messengers ? YES-2,253

    vs NO-2,285 Who was the first muslim ? ABRAHAM/JACOB-2,132 vs MOSES-7,143 vs MUHAMMED-39,12 Did one

    noahs sons die in flood ? YES-11,42-43 vs NO-21,76/37,75;77 Does all obey allah ? YES-30,26 vs

    NO-2,34 Could allah have a son ? YES-39,4 vs NO-6,100;1

  • @mRwhite298 wat r u saying i can't get it..

    u haven't read the quran or the wrong translation or just pick out the book/google search criticizing islam with random verses without context.

    everyone can make any book criticizing any holy scripture.

    i recommend you to read abdullah yusuf ali translation.

    searching google can't help you. u'll got more results criticising.

    it's a conspiracy so that no one can read quran and go to wrong direction.

    atleast read quran yourself b4 asking.

  • CONTRADICTIONS in quran-Can person free to belive in enything ? YES-2,256/18,29/109,6 vs

    NO-3,32/30,45/18,29/3,85/3,28/­4,89/4,144/5,51/60,1 DISBELIVERS ARE TARGET FOR

    YOU-4,101/9,12:14/,9,29/9,123 KILL DISBELIVERS-9,5/4,89 How Long did it take to create the Heavens

    and the Earth ? 6DAYS-7,54/10,3/11,7/57,38/57,­4 vs 8DAYS-41,9-12 What was man created from ?

    WATER-25,54 vs A CLOT- 96,1:2 vs CLAY/MUD-15,26/32,7/38,71 vs DUST-30,20/35,11

  • @mRwhite298 it seems you havent read quran u quoted ch39v4

    claiming allah have a son.

    but it says ch39v4: He created the heavens and the

    earth to manifest the Truth. He causes the night to succeed the day and the day to

    overtake the night. He has subjected the sun and the moon to His law, each one

    following a course for an appointed term. Is He not the All-Mighty, the All-

    Forgiving?

    no where is written He had a son.

    ur claims r false.

  • CONTRADICTIONS in quran- Did muhammed ask for fee ?

    YES-2,195/8,141/9,103/9,111/47­,38/57,10 vs NO-12,104/36,21/42,23/52,40/68­,46 How should Jews and

    Christians be treated ? WITH KINDNESS AND PATIENCE-2,109 vs BY FIGHTNING AGAINST-9,29 Which came

    first Heaven or Earth ? HEAVEN-79,27:30 vs EARTH-2,29/41,9:12 Will allah forgive enything ?

    YES-4,110/39,153 vs NO-4,48/4,116/4,137/4,168/9,80­/47,34/63,3:6 How many angels fought muhammed ?

    3000-3,124-126 vs 1000-8,9:10

  • CONTRADICTIONS in quran Have some passages in quran been abrogated/changed ? YES-2,106/16,101 vs

    NO-6,34/6,115/10,64/18,27 How many Angels spoke to Mary ONLY ONE-19,16-19 vs MORE THAT

    ONE-3,42/3,45 How long is allah day 1000Y-22,47/32,5 vs 50000Y-70,4 Who choose devil to be friend

    with unbelivers ALLAH-7,27 vs DISBELIVERS-7,30  Was Pharoahs SAVED-10,90:92 vs DROWNED-17,102-3

    Will all Jews & Christian go to hell YES-3,85/5,72 vs NO-2,62/5,69

  • oh people read qur'an and dont think that islam is bad

  • Islam is certainly not "the true religion" but organized Christianiity has pretty much bottomed out over the last couple decades and has worn out it's welcome. Jesus warned that true christians should be no part of the world and it's affairs and should "beat their swords into plowshares". He also stated that soon after his death religion would revert to their corrupt ways til the end... Islam and the church are both headed for the scrap yard according to revelation.. The bible however remains.

  • mr. tigerclaw1000

    the word dahaha has both of the meanings ....

    spreaded flatly rounded structure... (like ostrich shaped)..

    if its not to only flat.. than how can you walk within.. you fuckin retarded asshole.. lol

  • shame full, he did even admired that people knew the light of the moon was reflected light long before mohamed.

    No to mention how he just picks the meaning of the words as he please,

    Whole dictionaries have been rewritten to fit the Muslim apologist propaganda.

    Just compare the classical arabic dictionaries to the new ones. Word "dahaha" had only the meanings of some thing flat in classical dic. now the word can mean flat and round(ostrich egg shaped) :D according to the modern dic.

  • Unicorn in the bible, probably it shoots rainbows out it's ass too. lol

  • @3:01:44 Bush is watching..  ಠ_ಠ...

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Dr. Zakir Naik FTW! look at campbell laughable lol

  • To say that only recently it was discovered that the moon light is reflect light is just ignorance and stupidity on Zakir naik's part, A fracking 2 min Wikipedia search will show you that Greeks,Chinese,Indian and others knew that the moons light is reflected 1000 before Mohamed!!!

    This shows what type of research Dr. Naik dose.... a selective research!

    And Dr. LOL

  • @tigerclaw1000

    moon light is reflected was not known even a 1000 years earlier..

    there wasnt even the scientists at that time .if it is proved be4 then show the evidences baby,science and logic believe only in evidences, atleast show the authentic proofs of that scientists .don't look at wikipedia duffer.it contains many stories without evidences.what your ancients had done is they rehashed books of the arabs(scholars of quran)with fake writers like pythagoras etc with fake dates like 500bc.

  • Naik is either lying or stupid, egg shaped earth < Bull shit, Reflected light only in the qur'an < BS, Big bang in the Qur'an < BS, Embryology in qur'an < BS,

    ALL of his arguments are refuted all over the internet. Only on here on yt there are hundreds of refutations, all any has to do is look.

    None of his arguments withstand close scrutiny!

    They are sound only at first glance.

  • @tigerclaw1000

    hey you dumbass.. even i dont believe in it earlier but the question is,, if it was discovered 1400 years earlier then why it was'nt in your science books at that time. your reasoning is very poor , it is totally false.. you dont have brain you stupid, why it was not in your book even 400 or 500 years ago. bcoz that was not the age of science.

    your brain is closed, you dont have logic, stupid shithead.

  • @dnishkhn 1st wikipedia has refrences form where the author takes his information.

    2nd dahaha means only to flaten, check the clasical dictionaries, and even if dose mean ostrich egg its at best in accurate discription, earth is an oblate spheroid(flat tops) ostrich egg is the oposite(streched tops) its not a spear.

    3rd You want scientific prof, some one demonstrating moons light is reflected? but you accept that the qur'an show this fact WITHOUT scientific evidence?!

    1/2

  • @tigerclaw1000 you say zakirs linguistically gymnastics.. even i dont believe in zakir also, i myself have read the quran.your wikipedia has many fake information.. even your news channels also shows 90% fake news.dahaha comes from root words daha and dhuya means expanded and egg shaped.earth is exactly like ostrich egg shaped.

    ya i want proofs. but someone shows me a book written 1400 years earlier 100% scientific and logical abt origin of earth i'll believe it 2 b God's word.

  • @dnishkhn "ya i want proofs. but someone shows me a book written 1400 years earlier 100% scientific and logical abt origin of earth i'll believe it 2 b God's word."

    That in its lesf is ilogical, its a logical fallacy of argument from ignorance,

    I do not know who wrote that scientific knowladge in the qur'an, there fore it must be god.

    No we do not know even who wrote the qur'an for shore, or that any of its stories are true, they are all at best hear say of hear say of eye witness. 1/2

  • @dnishkhn 2/2 how can you even say it logical?

    here say(anecdotal) evidence s not accepted even in traffic court, which rules on parking tickets! let alone the question of GOD.

    You have an old book that after linguistically gymnastics that wire as Nadir admits fitted to modern science.

    Even if in the qur'an there was E=mc2, docent mean god put it there, for all we know it was aliens or just a coincidence or even a time traveler, the point is we do not know who wrote put it there.

  • @tigerclaw1000

    Q: who have discovered that 1400 yrs b4?

    u say moonlight discovered,mr. u know even moon nd sun considered as Gods that time.why it was not in your science book bcoz no1 had discovered it b4,it was just written in qur'an i.e. God's word.He doesn't need 2prove aything,He just says nd it's ur duty 2 believe Him or not.

    if some early scientist then show me evidence i'll believe u.

    if some alien then y ur alien don't come today nd tell something abt ur future.

  • @dnishkhn like i said, just because there is knowledge in a old book that was unknown at that time, docent mean it was put there by what or who ever that book says put it there.

    Its a classical logical fallacy: i do not know who put this knowledge here, this book tells me its this supernatural being(Allah) i do not have other explanations for that so it must be him.

    Argumentum at ignorantiam < google it.a

    not that there is any of that which you list.

    continues.

  • @dnishkhn Wikipedia uses references, if there is something fake in it, you can report it and provide proof, news media yea ofcource all of theme, i dount listen to theme, only to demonstrable facts.

    qur'an says dahaha not dhuya you cant just pic words that you like.

    You cant use the root words meaning over the actual words that is just so so wrong!

    "earth is exactly like ostrich egg shaped" no earth is exactly an oblate spheroid(little flat tops)

    ostrich egg has little stretched tops.

  • @tigerclaw1000 ok leave moonlight.

    time is a variable factor (ch32,v5)

    planets rotation (ch21,v33)

    water cycle (ch21,v29:ch30,v48:ch15,v22:ch­23,v13:ch24,v43:ch5,v57)

    plants have sexes (ch13,v3:ch40,v53)

    big bang (ch50,v47)

    water barrier (ch55,v19:ch20,v53)

    even fingerprinting methods is also there later discovered by francis galton in 1880.

    ques:who could have discovered it b4 1400 yrs?

    if you say some earlier scientist.i'll be not believing.atleast show me evidence.

  • @tigerclaw1000 ok leave moonlight.

    time is a variable factor (ch32,v5)

    planets rotation (ch21,v33)

    water cycle (ch21,v29:ch30,v48:ch15,v22:ch­23,v13:ch24,v43:ch5,v57)

    plants have sexes (ch13,v3:ch40,v53)

    big bang (ch50,v47)

    water barrier (ch55,v19:ch20,v53)

    even fingerprinting methods is also there later discovered by francis galton in 1880.

    ques:who could have discovered it b4 1400 yrs?

    if you say some earlier scientist.i'll be not believing.atleast show me evidence.

  • @tigerclaw1000 ok leave moonlight.

    time is a variable factor (ch32,v5)

    planets rotation (ch21,v33)

    water cycle (ch21,v29:ch30,v48:ch15,v22:ch­23,v13:ch24,v43:ch5,v57)

    plants have sexes (ch13,v3:ch40,v53)

    big bang (ch50,v47)

    water barrier (ch55,v19:ch20,v53)

    even fingerprinting methods is also there later discovered by francis galton in 1880.

    ques:who could have discovered it b4 1400 yrs?

    if you say some earlier scientist.i'll be not believing.atleast show me evidence.

  • @dnishkhn Just Google all of thous scientific miracles, you will find dozens of refutations on each of theme. Or search YT there are many videos to.

  • i dont want dozens of refutations what i want is only one but 100% authentic.if someone say after reading qur'an that was proved earlier by some scientist or assumed by some1 and gives the reference(fake). i'll not believe.

    assumption carry weight if based on logic.i know ancient greeks believe Gods like zues,hades,thor etc

    m true believer i know all these r conspiracies against islam.

    if some1 will show with evidence then i'll believe but till then i m a muslim.

    .ALLAHUAKBAR.

  • @dnishkhn LOL you want 100% demonstrable proof to disprove anecdotal claims?

    Like i said before you have a double standard of evidence. You accept that the qur'an really was written by god, the qur'an it self is anecdotal evidence, not to mention Nadirs mental gymnastics that he applies, as he him self admitted to fit the qur'an to science! But to disprove this you ask for 100% demonstrable proof by something that didn't even exist then, that is Scientists?!

    That is ridiculous!!

  • r u an athiest?

    which religion do you believe?

    mr. what u can say can't proove you keep on arguing with rubbish claims.

    u cant prove contradictions in qur'an.

    even no one had proven since 1400yrs nor anyone will prove till the end of the earth.

    many scientific verses are not discovered yet but will be discovered later as far the science will become advanced. this is my belief. nd person like u will claim 2 b discoverd earlier with rubbish claims.

    u havent ans even 1 of my question

  • @dnishkhn

    LOL you do not grasp the concept of fitting interpretations to facts of science dount you :D.

    You can make Manny books Fit modern scientific facts, not even applying the same method of mental gymnastics zakir uses, only by reading what is there!

    Google: "Holy Moby Dick"

    And atheist dont have a religion, that is the whole point of atheism :).

  • ya ur right.we cant make books fit to modern science.it'll be proved wrong. that's y we follow the glorious qur'an.the true book.

    i know atheism dont hav religion.even i was an atheism 3 yr earlier.you know little knowledge of science makes u n atheist nd more knowlege makes u a true believer.

    Quran is not book of science but a book of signs which guides human beings to the right way,the way which the greatest philosophers are unable to decline it.

    albert einstein(an atheist) said

  • @dnishkhn Nope, statistic all over the world show: the more educated, intelligent the person is the more likely he is to become an atheist.

    "Quran is not book of science but a book of signs which guides human beings to the right way"

    You can say that about any book to. "oh its a book from the prophet of my new religion, Prophet Herman Melville, it must be a book of signs for us"

    And like i said, all of the scientific miracle claims have been refuted(means they are BS) many times

  • m not a believer of statistics m a believer of logic.what ur statistics says i dont believe coz they are ordinary nd i m extra with God's grace.even u cant challege me.even ur atheism supporting countries like USA believe in God today(check 1 dollar note) and i also know their intentions in the future regarding dajjal and illuminati proccess, which is already mention in qur'an and sahi hadith mashallah.you don't know the internal affairs coz u liv in virtual world created by jews.

  • @dnishkhn illuminati? LOL,

    USA supporting Atheist???? ROFL US is almost 75% Christian, you dount get in to government before you pledge to GOD! US is One of the most religious countries there are.

    Atheist countries: Denmark, Japan, Sweden.

    "u lie in virtual world created by Jews."

    LOL wake up, dount listen to every thing AL-jazira or your imam tells you.

    Jews are not the rulers of the world :D. There is no Zionist conspiracies. By any chance, are you Palestinian?

  • u know nothing.. your knowledge is poor usa is christian country but the officers ruling the nation are jews. usa is a slave of jews. if there is no conspiracies of jews then give me reason behind 4 US presidents assassinations, why federal govt. rule US.

    manachem begin who did bomb blast in king david hotel in 1946 in uk. declared as terrorist no. 1 by british govt. becomes president of israel and get noble prize for peace.

    can u tell why?

    ya i've waken up b4 u.

    i m india nd u??

  • @dnishkhn No you have to prove your asertion, you have to prove that Jews rule the world or US

    You said you know logic, then you should know that.

    I am Russian but live in Czech rep.

  • @tigerclaw1000

    even if i show u information regarding that. u'll keep on arguing and will not believe that's ur problem. first you should open your mind.

    even al jazeerah controlled by jews.nd i dont believe on imams.i hav researched on my own and found them right.

    they are turning atheist of all over the world over concept of alien coming to earth or contacting secretly.later on they'll say dajjal as alien or God.many will believe in it nd become follower of devil as the jews r.

  • @dnishkhn If you provide, sound logical reasons backed by evidence, i am forced to believe that.

    Logic is almost like math, if your logic checks out and your evidence is soficient to prove such claims, I have to believe it.

    I have never heard of any one converting Atheist to alienism :D or what not,

    If there is enough evidence for aliens i will believe that they exist to,

    and statisticaly speaking it IS IMPOSIBLE that there is no other life form(bacteria even) in the universe

  • think u r highly inspired by einstein even m also but dat doesnt means einstein is right in every perspective. universe is expanding proved by edwin hubble in 1929. earlier einstein had found universe expanding or contracting but unable to believe he

    introduced fuge facter(a constant) to avoid this problem. after Hubble's discovery, he said changing his equation was the biggest blunder of his life.

    i.e in quran.prophet said dont get satisfy by knowlege u get but go to the roots.

  • @tigerclaw1000

    my brother the reasons is u r searching against islam.

    if ur mind is against islam how can u get it.

    it seems that u r a reader. so plz atleast read quran with right english translation like abdullah yusuf ali translation..

    and i bet u'll be with it . it's a religion of peace.

  • ok.

    i m telling u a future.

    may be it can b wrong bcoz it is my logic.

    the UFO's will be seen more in da future.

    maybe forming a triangle in da sky.

    like bermuda triangle showing some relation to pyramid in egypt nd dey will say some alien had come to egypt nd dey made pyramid.

    atlast dajjal will come with powers.he will b a superman with a huge military

    and science.with high viruses and antidotes. he will travel with a speed of light he will travel whole world in 40 days.

  • Comment removed

  • @dnishkhn you accept it after Zakirs linguistically gymnastics that do not make sense,

    That just because the word might mean reflected light.

    Well known people said that the moons light is reflected light strait out, without Zakirs linguistically gymnastics 1000 years! before Mohamed, by the same reasoning Zakir thinks qur'an talks about moons reflected light he should accept all the other ancient works that say this.

    and LOL:

    "fake writers like Pythagoras"

    "fake dated like 500BC"

    LOL

  • @tigerclaw1000

    my brother.. atleast giv me proof of some1 discovered moonlight be4 ph. muhammad(pbuh).

    i dont want false belief. i've researched alot. atleast b logical.if u say prophet muhd.(who was illeterate) himself wrote the quran.then it's not true, he was not even the scientist nd dat was not the age of science either, that was the age of art and literature nd quran was the best book in that.many of its verses are later discovered by the scientific discoveries.

  • Quran is not book of science but a book of signs which guides human beings to the right way,the way which the greatest philosophers are unable to decline it.

    mr. hey mr. i m not saying that ur atheist Albert Einstein said that.

    you can say it to any book.

    ans: m not saying 2 any, m saying 2 Quran,ok if there's any bring it 2 me.i'll check.but atleast beleive in quran till then..dont die as a non believer and u can't find solution for death........ peace............

  • @dnishkhn i told you, look up: "Holy Moby Dick"

    And i am tiered of telling Muslims the same thing, about how 90% of nadirs claims are Lies or half truths to leave an impression on you that This was only in the qur'an and no one before it knew or even though if:

    moon light - Greek,Chinese, Indians

    big bang - is not in the qur'an, nadir just chose the meaning of the word that fitted the facts, 99% of scholars translated the word as wast not expanding.

    finger prints - Chinese

    Go search

  • @tigerclaw1000

    plz open realjewsnewsdotcom.

    i can't quote url

    search goodnewsaboutgod/studies/polit­ical/jews/jews_run_world

    u'll find history is changed from the beginning.

    search yvonne ridley in youtube, a bbc reporter who was captured by talibans in afghanistan. how they treat her like a guest?

    search 9/11 loose change.

    talibans haven't done 9/11 its a conspiracy.

    even al-qaeda havent existed said by the hilary clinton herself.

    the logical ques. is y they are hiding islam.

  • see my videos - Naik tellls a big fib about Frank Press - so what else does he make up?

  • @turnerchris1 you are a fake you stinking pile of horse crap your mother should have been slapped the day you were born jagoff

  • CAMPBELL KNOWLEDGE OF THE BIBLE 1/10

    NAIK KNOWLEDGE OF THE BIBLE 10/10

    CAMPBELL LOOK SO STUPID N WAS GIVEN A GOOD LESSON....

  • NAIK WIN N CAMPBELL FAIL.....

    I NEVER SAW NAIK FAIL n HE WILL NEVER BKOZ HE IS N THE TRUTH PART........

  • THis is a Brilliant Debate. One of the best I have seen as Christian.

  • @travismification so did u accept islam?

  • It's not full. Some parts are cut.

  • Wow amazing, you uploaded the whole thing...

  • Brothers and sisters from all faiths I hope you can listen to the complete debate and then do your own research as to the references provided... May Allah guide you all... I was shocked at the fact re women in the bible do I did my research and was even more shocked... The adultery test lol...

  • ahh there is no calibre of opponents worthy of Naik! but i guess it is easy for Naik as he supports something that is correct in all aspects. It's hard for campbell to prove something is right when it is clearly wrong.

  • Dr William Campbell completely got owned.

  • Prophet Mohammad said: "Allah created the earth on Saturday, the mountains on Sunday, trees on Monday, bad things on Tuesday and light on Wednesday, and the animals on Thursday. Adam was created on Friday."

    (Sahih Muslim, vol.2 book 53 nr. 1605)

    Mohammad also said that the earth was there before light.. unscientific

  • @DeejayPaquistanoO brother, this is Qur'an and Bible in the light of science not Qur'an Bible and Hadith in the light of science, but I did look it up and its not number 1605 its Hadith 6607, and its status is weak, which meanstheres a chance Mohammed peace be upon him wasn't his complete and full words.

  • @Derrickrose1212 brother, i just yesterday converted to islam after an imaam gave me a wonderful explanation about that perticular hadith and about the Qur'an.. i feel so bad that i thought islam was wrong.. I pray to Allah that HE forgives me

  • @DeejayPaquistanoO Mashallah, Allah Akbur, you have no idea how happy you just made me feel. Brother, if you want anything, want anyone, want any person to talk to, im always here. We share a common bond and i love you for the sake of Allah s.w.t. Don't worry about Allah forgiving you, there is no one like him, he is so merciful and so generous it is out of this world. You found the truth path and for that all your sins are washed away may allah guide everyone in search for the truth.

  • @DeejayPaquistanoO congratiulations may Allah keep you in this path and bless you with knowledge as HE is the Alknown afther praying good to ask these things to Allah .iman believe in Allah and good deads , righteanous also in your religion praires etc and afther you gain knowledge about islam it is nexessary to share the message of islam .step by step brother congratiulations may Allah reward you with good position in aftherlife

  • @DeejayPaquistanoO actually muhammad didnt say that,as the classical scholars pointed out,it wa actually a jew called kaab who became muslim and was explaining what the torah says

  • @DeejayPaquistanoO Following bronze/iron-age media is unscientific in general, they did not have the tools that we have today. There is alot of evidence to debunk Mohammeds theory. Stromatoliths in the archean era was the first complex biological organism found on earth. They produced the first free oxygen. So many factors play in that i dont blame anyone for believing Mohammed or other prophets in that era. But ignoring the obvious evidence is quite ignorant. PEACE

  • you see denial again . it tells you as he says if you drink poison , you wont die . so if its gods word which it isnt cos ive heard of many christians poisoned to death . they dint tempt the lord , they were poisoned . and then theres those that drank themselves. if xtians believed this was gods word they wud drink to prove it . ....

  • Helped me tell my history teacher wrong.

  • Comment removed

  • complete ownage by dr.zakir naik, dr.william campbell basically admitted that he couldnt answer and that he was defeated

  • mark 16;17 says drink poison and you wont die, if xtians think this is gods word why will no xtian drink and prove it, if you want people to risk there souls on your word then prove it too them since they risking soo much , and you wont risk so little.also bible says light was created on the 1st day and the sun was created on the 4th day .explain that theres also more bullshit in the 6day creation see urselves everything is out of order

  • @sajakram1

    Actually it says "IF" not to tempt God and drink any poison as you infer it says.

    Mark 16:18

    They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover.

    Ref, to taking up serpents is referring to this example.

    Acts 28:5

    And he shook off the beast into the fire, and felt no harm....

  • @sajakram1 Has anyone ever explained to you that Mark 16:17 was added in afterwards?. In my bible these scriptures are written as a footnote and aren't considered part of the original work. I don't put any stock in these scriptures for the same reason I don't put any stock in the Quran or the Book or Mormon. They are cheap knockoffs of the real thing. Also, you don't have a clue what you're talking about in Genesis.

  • @guistar26

    You are simply displaying your ignorance of what you dont' know. If Mark 16.17 was an afterthought, how do you explain the surefire effects that verse is producing among real christians all over the word today -not to mention the devastation it continues to wreck on the kingdom of darkness and its followers ?? The bible itself speak of people like you whom of whom it said satan, the god of this world has blinded their eyes and mind so that they won't believe and be saved.

  • @TexBrunoTC Not sure what you're talking about with "real christians" feeling the effects of those verses. Give me an example of a group of true christians who live by Jesus example.

  • It's great that Dr Campbell presented some of the many fullfilled Messianic prophecies by Jesus, but he should have known that muslims do not believe in prophecies of prophets, they believe in prophets who never prophecied anything. And they believe that God would allow the prophecies of his own prophets to be corrupted.

  • haha amazing how u muslims editted this.. u muslims are to dishonest to even have a debate with.. this zakir guy goes as far to lie to his own muslim audiance and since all the ignorant muslims believe him blindly they clap like mad man. The fact of the matter is that the scientific errors presented by Dr Campbell are proof that the quran is not from God. And this is why Zakir doesn't debate anymore he thought he could win from this old grandpa but he was wrong

  • Campbell shared what He knows and he knows the science and made clear that Quran is in serious error with science. If u r talking about muslims chanting everytime naik speaks, that does not mean he is right. U have to have sound mind and open ear to see who is right!

  • amazing, Dr. Campbell has really nailed the scientific errors of the quran. Great man! Respect!

  • @alimir84

     lol:P are you HIGH?? eh?? we can clearly see who got speechless:P

  • @crownby Yes it does, if you want to know pm me.

  • @crownby Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.

    Albert Einstein, "Science, Philosophy and Religion: a Symposium", 1941

    US (German-born) physicist (1879 - 1955)

  • Dr. Zakir is a braniac who help people to know about truth

    All by Blessings of Allah Pak nothing else

    Inshallah there are more Copies nd better Copies of Zakir Naik are on its way

    like Imran and sons of Zakir and alot other

    Mahsallah

  • WHO STILL DARE TO CHALLENGE ZAKIR NAIK?

  • @OacidburnO LOL like every atheist, Just Google, you find hundreds of refutations, debunking Zakir naiks, and all of his claims and so called arguments 

  • Dr Zakir Naik is a legend witha a super computer brain

    he owned all other religions

  • Salaam on to Dr Zakir Naik

  • allahu akbar

  • Nope, nope, nope ... will NOT watch a debate FOUR HOURS LONG that has NOTHING in it that Jesus didnt say. When did Jesus ever say science is important? Jesus NEVER spoke as a baby nor did Jesus ever say the words: allah, muslim, quran, Islam, Muhammad or science!

    All have been [FABRICATED] in the quran 1,400 yrs ago.

    In fact, what makes Islam, quran, & allah so falsified is the fact NO MUSLIM CAN PROVE MUHAMMAD IS A PROPHET THRU THE BIBLE! Yet, Islam believes Muhammad is IN the bible! Go figure!

  • @jefeisdguard in islam we also don't need science to proof that Quran is gods world. but this idiot DR. william Campbell is trying to say that quran is false because of some science .. but of course dr Zakir Naik proofed that william is liar and his comments have no weight

  • @alpinam3

    Of course the quran is wrong! The science the quran brings is all generalized! There are NO human interest miracles in quran (like healings, exorcisms & bringing back from the dead miracles) & Islam says the earth is FLAT! I have seen videos(already removed; how convenient) where muslim clerics have restated the qurans position that the earth is flat! Simply put, Islam is false ONLY b/c Muhammad is NOT proved 2B a prophet biblically.

  • @jefeisdguard find me verse in quran where it says that earth is flat.. it says that earth is like in shape of egg.. ostrich egg.. its not like chicken egg. .but it's not also perfect round like a ball

  • Re: Q 79:30

    “dahaha” dozntt mean egg-shaped’ in Arabic

    its derived from “Duhiya” which refers (NOT mean)egg of ostrich

    1st, word “Duhiya” not a root, But a noun & derived from

    “da-ha-wa”, same root verb “dahaha” comes from.

    2nd, word “duhiya” doesNOT mean egg of an Ostrich

    A”Duhiya” actually means the PLACE IN THE SAND, where an Ostrich lays its eggs; doesn’t actually refer to the egg itself

    Its flat b/c Ostriches ‘spread out’ the earth w/feet to lay its eggs, Ostrich doznt have a nest.

    

  • @alpinam3

    Quran described the shape of earth using the following Arabic words:

    Madda, Madadnaha, Firasha, Mahdan, Farashnaha, Bisata, Mihada, Dahaha, Tahaha and Sutehat.

    Every one of them means FLAT. It is clear that Allah, according to the Quran wants to tell man that earth is flat, and he used all available Arabic vocabulary to get the message across. This is precisely what people understood from the Quran for 1400 years.

  • @alpinam3

    Q. 13:3 And He it is who hath outstretched the earth, and placed on it the firm mountains

    Madda

    Q. 15:19 And the earth have WE spread out

    Madadnaha

    Q. 20:53 [since he is the One] Who has laid out the earth as a carpet for you

    Mahdan`

    Q. 2:22 Who made the earth a bed for you, and the heaven a roof

    Firasha

  • @alpinam3

    Q. 43:10 (Yea, the same that) has made for you the earth (like a carpet) spread out

    Mahdan`

    Q. 50:6-7 What, have they not beheld heaven above them, how we have built it, and decked it out fair, and it has no cracks? And the earth -- We stretched it forth, and cast on it firm mountains, and we caused to grow therein of every joyous kind

    Madadnaha

  • @alpinam3

    Q. 79:27-30 What, are you stronger in constitution or the heaven He built? He lifted up its vault, and levelled it, and darkened its night, and brought forth its forenoon; and the earth - after that He spread it out...

    Dahaha

    Q. 88:20 Nor even how the earth has been flattened out?

    Sutehat

    Q. 91:5-6 By the heaven and that which built it and by the earth and That which extended it!

    Tahaha

  • @jefeisdguard ''And (remember) when 'Īsā (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), said: "O Children of Israel! I am the Messenger of Allâh unto you confirming the Taurât [(Torah) which came] before me, and giving glad tidings of a Messenger to come after me, whose name shall be Ahmed. But when he (Ahmed i.e. Muhammad SAW) came to them with clear proofs, they said: "This is plain magic." [Dr Mohsin translation Surah 61:6, from Quran explorer]... Ahmad translated means the praised one or Paraclete

  • @t6658

    My friend; 1st, how can Muhammad be anything if he is NOT a prophet or proved to be one, hmmm?

    2nd, why would mere men mouth words to Jesus in the quran; Jesus NEVER said? This is blasphemous b/c Jesus spoke the words of God(John 12:49) & never mentioned the words: “allah” or muslim!

    3rd, paraclete is a spirit; NOT FLESH! Dictionary(dot)com defines ‘paraclete’ as the comforter & HOLY SPIRIT! Luke 24:39 says a spirit has NO flesh; so why does Islam LIE about Muhammad?

  • @jefeisdguard So you tell me the Hebrew translation of he is altogether lovely.

  • @t6658 You wrote: -QUOTE- So you tell me the Hebrew translation of he is altogether lovely. -UNQUOTE- MUH'D, means praiseworthy, lovely one, beloved one & used in Song of Solomon 5:16 Muh'ds name in Hebrew equivalent is “MACHMUD” According to Strong’s #4261 & Hebrew tetragrammaton MACHMUD means lovely, beloved, praiseworthy Dalet = pathway, to enter Mem = overpowering chaos Chet = a wall or a fence … separation Mem = overpowering chaos MEANS: The pathway to overpowering chaos & separation
  • @jefeisdguard So.....You don't know what the Hebrew translation of, ''he is altogether lovely'', is?

  • @t6658

    You wrote:

    -QUOTE-

    So.....You don't know what the Hebrew translation of, ''he is altogether lovely'', is?

    -UNQUOTE-

    Machmud.

    Since when does Islam rewrite the English language?

    How is an adjective a noun?

    How is an adjective prophetic & in reference to a person that hasn’t been born yet for a thousand years other than whom its being used for in a sentence?

  • @jefeisdguard Machmud's short definition is desire or desirable thing. Related terms includes ma·ḥă·mad·dîm. Some Bibles translates it as desirable, but the KJV translate it as ''yea, he [is] altogether lovely''. What the translators have done, is translate Muhammad. They had no right to translate a name. Muhamaddim is Muhammad, with respect....

  • @t6658

    Muhammad is NOT shown anywhere in the bible b/c Muhammad is NOT-A-PROPHET-ACCORDING-TO-THE­-BIBLE!

    Muhammad is NOT from the seed of Isaac in Genesis 21:12 God said to Abraham : "... for in Isaac shall thy (Abrahams) seed be called"

    Song of Solomon 5:16 seems to be such a desperate act by Islam in trying hard to legitimize Islam insidiously thu a guy NOT even a prophet!

    Do YOU or any muslim here even KNOW why Song of Solomon is in the bible?

    C'mon, challenge to all know-it-alls!

  • @jefeisdguard Okay, I understand your point. Your not denying Muhammad (PBUH) is mentioned in the Bible by name & with respect, but you just don't see how this is a prophecy, probably relating the name to a coincident. So I will take you to my other example of the Paraclete....

  • @jefeisdguard Prophet Jesus (pbuh) talked in Hebrew (Aramaic) not in Latin. Therefore the Bible was in Aramaic. Later it was translated into Greek and Latin. The most important distortions happened during these translations. As it did with the word Paraclete…

  • @jefeisdguard ...The meaning of Paraclete in Greek is “a comforter” and another meaning is “someone who is pleaded to”. With the later meaning the word “Paraclytos” cannot be used as a name to describe anyone. It is even unthinkable that such a name would exist in the world. There is another word in Greek, which is “Periclytos” meaning “Ahmad, the Praised One”....

  • @jefeisdguard ...While the translators were translating the Bible to Greek from the language that it was originally revealed in, Aramaic, they mistranslated the word Periclytos as Paraclytos. In this case, if there was not an “a” between the letters “p” and “r” and it was spelled as Periclytos, it would be the exact translation of “Ahmad” into Greek. If this mistake was not made, then Prophet Muhammad’s name would be directly mentioned in the Bible with the word “Periclytos”. ...

  • @jefeisdguard ....The Quran states that Prophet Muhammad’s name is mentioned as “Ahmad” in the Bible:

    “And when Jesus son of Mary said: O Children of Israel! Lo! I am the messenger of Allah (sent) unto you, confirming that which was (revealed) before me in the Torah, and bringing good tidings of a messenger who comes after me, whose name is the Praised One….” (Surah Saff: 6)...

  • @jefeisdguard ...If the word Periclytos had not been distorted in the Bible, this verse in the Quran would be clearly seen. And Christians would have to accept Prophet Muhammad.

    Regardless, both words foretell the coming of another Prophet and that is the last prophet, “Prophet Muhammad”. Because it is recorded in history that He (pbuh) is the only prophet who came after Jesus (PBUH)....

  • @jefeisdguard I can give you evidences on other words that have been mistranslated, with Christian evidence. Just ask. Peace :)

  • @t6658

    You wrote:

    -QUOTE-

    I can give you evidences on other words that have been mistranslated, with Christian evidence. Just ask. Peace :)

    -UNQUOTE-

    I am asking. Plz. LET ME HAVE IT!

  • @jefeisdguard The whole idea of the mistranslated words, is to show you, how easy it is to mistranslate the actual word Periclytos as Paraclytos, & that it has happened with other words....

  • @jefeisdguard ...Example 1,

    Isaiah 7:14 "Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel."

    Christians admit, virgin in this verse is a mistranslation of the Hebrew word "almah", which actually means "young woman".

    Back then, a young women was considered unmarried & therefore a virgin. Today a young woman is not necessarily a virgin. "Bethulah" would have been the correct word to use if the author meant virgin...

  • @jefeisdguard The author of Isaiah 7:14, had no right to change young women into virgin. He should have kept it, virgin.

    This is why I believe, the flat earth verses crept into the Bible; because the author mistranslated words to meet his agenda....

  • @t6658 You wrote: -QUOTE- I also proved to you, the Bible is dirty, x-rated material, & features misquotes. The word Virgin that you use, is not there in Isaiah 7:14. -UNQUOTE- Pick one of the topics below & I will prove to you how much PORN Islam has. The following must be sent via PM. All can ask & I will send. 1) Sex & Sexuality in Islam 2) Enjoying a Female Body in Islam 3) Coitus Interruptus in Islam 4) Child Sex in Islam 5) Sex with Captives in Islam 6) Sex & Masturbation in Islam
  • @jefeisdguard First, what is PM, then I will tell you my answer to which of the 6 to discuss. Thanks

  • @jefeisdguard Example 2,

    Song Of Solomon 7:2, ''Thy navel is like a round goblet, which wanteth not liquor: thy belly is like an heap of wheat set about with lilies.'' in short, the man is saying to the women, your belly button tastes like wine. This is found in Song Of Solomon Chapter 7, which many people have rated 'x'.....

  • @t6658

    You wrote:

    -QUOTE-

    The meaning of Paraclete in Greek is “a comforter” & another meaning is “someone who is pleaded to”. W/later meaning the word “Paraclytos” cannot be used as a name to describe anyone. It is even unthinkable that such a name would exist in the world. There is another word in Greek, which is “Periclytos” meaning “Ahmad, the Praised One”

    -UNQUOTE-

    Like algebra or thesaurus, words w/meanings R inserted ones discretion anywhere.

    Ur taking it far 2 literally.

  • @t6658

    You wrote:

    -QUOTE-

    You obviously know it is a spelling error. By women, I meant woman. As I proved, Muhammad (PBUH) is mentioned in the Bible, by 2 different names, 1 of which predicts his coming as a Prophet.

    -UNQUOTE-

    Muhammad is NO WHERE IN THE BIBLE B/C HE IS NOT A PROPHET THRU GENESIS. Genesis is the ONLY place Muhammad can be proved to be a prophet!

  • @jefeisdguard ...Carole Fountain, a Professor of Biblical Studies in ''Andover-Newton Theological School'' in Massachusetts (the oldest graduate school of theology in the United States of America) says Song Of Solomon Chapter 7 Verse 2 Actually Says The Women's Vagina Tastes Like Wine.

    This is a Biblical scholar saying it, not some tom dick or harry, & nor is it a Muslim saying it. Peace :)

  • @t6658

    You wrote:

    -QUOTE-

    Regardless, both words foretell the coming of another Prophet and that is the last prophet, “Prophet Muhammad”. Because it is recorded in history that He (pbuh) is the only prophet who came after Jesus (PBUH)....

    -UNQUOTE-

    If Muhammad was to have come after jesus then Muhammad would have to be from the seed of Isaac in Genesis. Can YOU prove Muhammad is from the lineage of Isaac? If not, then all your dreams & wishes’ of Islams truth go down the toilet!

  • @t6658

    You wrote:

    -QUOTE-

    Isaiah 7:14 "Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel."

    Christians admit, virgin in this verse is a mistranslation of the Hebrew word "almah", which actually means "young woman".

    -UNQUOTE-

    What Christians? Google it. Lexicon says “virgin”. Strongs #5959 & Hebrews spells the word: “ha’al:mah”

  • @jefeisdguard Other evidence of mistranslations, can be proven by the simple fact, the Bible is not authentic or preserved, & has been corrupted. If you want evidence, I will give you Christian evidence. Just ask :) Peace

  • @t6658

    You wrote:

    -QUOTE-

    and it was spelled as Periclytos, it would be the exact translation of “Ahmad” into Greek.

    If this mistake was not made, then Prophet Muhammad’s name would be directly mentioned in the Bible with the word “Periclytos”

    -UNQUOTE-

    DICTIONARY(DOT)COM … defines ‘paraclete’ as a spirit = Holy Spirit = comforter. Jesus says in Luke 24:39 a spirit has NO flesh. What is it that YOU don’t understand btwn a fleshy type of guy & a spirit? Was Muhammad a ghost?

  • You wrote:

    -QUOTE-

    ....The Quran states that Prophet Muhammad’s name is mentioned as “Ahmad” in the Bible:

    “And when Jesus son of Mary said: O Children of Israel! Lo! I am the messenger of Allah ….” (Surah Saff: 6)...

    -UNQUOTE-

    The bible mentions MANY names in the bible! Even MINE! Neither one of us are prophets, right? THERE ARE NO PROPHETS BY THE NAME OF MUHAMMAD OR AHMAD TO DATE … IN THE BIBLE!

    Quran [FABRICATED] the words of Jesus in this verse. Jesus NEVER said them in the bible.

  • You wrote:

    -QUOTE-

    The whole idea of the mistranslated words, is to show you, how easy it is to mistranslate the actual word Periclytos as Paraclytos, & that it has happened with other words....

    -UNQUOTE-

    Are YOU implying dictionary(dot)com is wrong? It defines a paraclete as the Holy Spirit & comforter. How can U intelligently misconstrue that as a flesh & blood human man?

    That’s not a mistranslation but stupidity on Islams part. You have to lie for the LIE that began 1,400 yrs ago.

  • @t6658

    You wrote:

    -QUOTE-

    Song Of Solomon 7:2, ''Thy navel is like a round goblet, which wanteth not liquor: thy belly is like an heap of wheat set about with lilies.'' in short, the man is saying to the women, your belly button tastes like wine. This is found in Song Of Solomon Chapter 7, which many people have rated 'x'.....

    -UNQUOTE-

    Are U implying there is NO such thing in reference to porn about Muhammad?

    Want to make a bet?

  • @jefeisdguard Give me Quranic reference, where God himself, lets porn into the Quran

  • @jefeisdguard ...& as explicitly as vagina tasting like wine

  • @jefeisdguard Sorry, I wrote, ''The author of Isaiah 7:14, had no right to change young women into virgin. He should have kept it, VIRGIN.'' I meant, ''The author of Isaiah 7:14, had no right to change young women into virgin. He should have kept it, YOUNG WOMEN.''

  • @t6658

    My friend, why do you post the word "women" as in a plural ... in regards to Isaiah 7:14?

    This is a prophesy of Jesus who was transfigured from spirit to flesh & placed in the chosen surrogates womb (Matt 1:18 & 20) Jesus was also prophesied in Deut 18:18 & Jeremiah 31:31

    Muh'd is NOT a prophet thus NOT in the bible anywhere!

    Isaiah 7:14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.

  • @jefeisdguard You obviously know it is a spelling error. By women, I meant woman. As I proved, Muhammad (PBUH) is mentioned in the Bible, by 2 different names, 1 of which predicts his coming as a Prophet. I also proved to you, the Bible is dirty, x-rated material, & features misquotes. The word Virgin that you use, is not there in Isaiah 7:14. I have even given you Christian reference. You dare not ask for me to give you Christian reference for the Bible being corrupted...