I like your videos, except some of these about socialism and american politics.
The Japanese government has a LOT of socialist legislation. Look at their healthcare system, taxing system, etc. However, I really love living in Japan and I think what they are doing here is amazing. Why not have a system for healthcare close to Japan's system in the USA? Would that be socialism? Honestly, I can't believe how well it works here. It is extremely cheap and I have great access to healthcare.
Is the healthcare run and operated by the government? Are fees set by the government or the market place. I bet they do not have lawyers ready to sue at every turn. How owns the insurance companies?
Also what works good for one nation does not always work good for another.
The Japanese government does not operate the healthcare system. They set all fees in a bi-yearly book that says exactly what can be charged for every procedure. There is a national insurnance company which is compulsary. However, there are hundreds of private companies, and most Japanese carry insurance for dental and other things the government doesn't cover. It is true, they do not have lawyers ready to sue at every turn, which makes a MAJOR difference.
Sorry, ran out of room! One more important factor is that almost ALL of the healthcare industry is owned privately. 85% of all hospitals in Japan are owned and operated privately. They are also non-for-profit. The government controls the sallary cap and awards bonuses based on patient reviews of their happiness with the service. So, if patients are happy docs make more money.
Very interesting. Thanks for the explaination. Unfortunately due to the lobbyist and lawyers in the USA, what is working in Japan will never work in the USA. Congress has legalized corruption and bribes via the lobbyist system. The lawyers continue to hold the Democrats hostage by being the number one contributor to the Democrats. Washington reeks with corruption worse than any third world thin pot despot control shame of a republic.
Since when is mandatory civic service by youth considered a step towards facism or even communism for that matter?
In Canada, every Ontario high school student must complete 40 hours of community service in order to receive a diploma. Where the service is carried out is optional, and students are not bound to any one location.
That does not further your point in any way. I have graduated and I don't walk around doing the jack booted goose step. I'm no far-left nutjob, but your ultra conservative "red scare" crap is too much. Can you say "McCarthy?"
If that's how you feel, then lock me up because I'm a communist.
You seem to forget that your country was founded on the progressive ideals of a time called "the Enlightenment." Your current ability to speak your political opinion did not spring up out of the archaic monarchical ways. The first ever democracy required drastic change and must continue to evolve to survive.
Imagine that...
So if you're afraid of a little more liberalism, I suggest you find somewhere else to live. North Korea?
Modern liberalism is in no way related to the founding fathers' vision of limited government and personal liberty. It is more closely related to Kim Jong Il and the tyranny of North Korea. Pol Pot Pelosi and Papa Doc Obama have no concern for liberty.
I was trying to make a point. I'm not leaning far left on the political spectrum. I just don't agree with and ultra-conservative approach to anything. Bush fucked your country, now it's Obama's job to fix it. Quite the task if you ask me..
I hear you about Bush but Obama's rehashed radical leftism isn't going to fix anything. He'll make the country worse. The answer is more LIBERTY not more statism. Unfortunately, Bush was no libertarian, either.
USA is gone to communist shit! Even we can see that , and it seems like we see alot better than you all. Why are americans oblivious to what is unfolding right in front of them. You all can just ignore it and fall, because with moron in office that is exactly what is happening, just keep that damn border up and dont bring your asses or that communist bullshit up here!
Giving loans to people who' deserve' them is what has caused the global meltdown in the banking system and it was Obama and his leftist friends who engineered that one. Now he has his hands on all the power he can really fuck things up. The credit crunch is a walk in the park compared to what he can do now. Still, when he's finished he can no doubt go and bow to Sheik yer Money or whoever it was who paid for his rise to power.
We are slowly becoming slaves of the new socialist state headed by Czar g. soros, and his puppet , comrade obama. We are doomed unless Republicans can make a comeback in 2012 and reverse the hell that bobo is creating.
I have to disagree with you. I disagree with you writing "slowly" when it seems rather evident it is a "rapid" decline as they must complete the takeover before the 2010 Congressional elections.
I see you & USAGymnast are having fun as I knew you two would.
Well, lets pick apart your obvious bias in interpreting those facts. You stated that Regan, Eisenhower, & Nixon taxed at 50%, 91%, & 77% respectively. For now, I only need to discredit one point to bring down your house of cards.
...hmmm....ummm....yes, I'll start with President Reagan.
You are factually correct that the highest tax rate was 50% under Regan. What you failed to do is put the fact in context, which if you had, you would of presented relevant information. Instead, you just spat out data to push your views.
Regan REDUCED the tax rate from 70% to 50% in 1982. He also REDUCED to marginal tax amount on the highest rate from $212k to $106k. This is called information.
Whoa, hold on there lil buddy. My point was your data was useless data to push your warped view. Lets keep it simple and not go off tangent like some people are known for.
You purposely left out relevant information to push your propaganda. Period.
My ONLY point was that ALL 3 were Republicans and all 3 taxed the rich at a higher rate than Obama plans to. That's it. It's THAT simple. No "tangent". I supplied the link many times.
It's obvious now you don't understand the higher level of debates. You tend, or should I say, are accustomed to school yard discussion with little or no regard to logic, logical procedural or argument, relevant facts, information (not data) within context of debate and so forth.
You ARE retarded. If it is at 91% in the 50s, and then at 77% under Nixon, and then at 50% under Reagan, then any third grader can see that numbers are going downward.
OF COURSE Republicans are going to lower taxes on the wealthy! We ALL know THAT.
But Obama's tax on the wealthy will STILL be lower than all 3 of those Republican Presidents.
You cherry pick 3 presidents out of 17 to state the tax rate is going down so Prez Regan wasn't all that. I've got news for you, like your double digit IQ level, the tax rates went up and down depending who was in the office.
I picked 3 famous REPUBLICANS dumbshit because that was my fucking POINT.
Comparing past tax rates on the wealthy under former REPUBLICAN Presidents to those proposed by Obama in order to debunk these teabagger "socialism" morons. Reagan still taxed the rich at 10% MORE than Obama plans to. and Eisenhower taxed them at 91% during the booming fifties.
Hey idiot, like I said before, put it in context. When you compareNixon, Eisenhower, & Regan to Obama's current tax rate, you must compare the preceding year's tax rate for all the respective Presidents. Does that make sense ya monkey? Does it?
No, I'd wager it's going over ur head. How is this moron going to compare 2008's tax rate of 35% to lets say 1981's rate of 70% and say Obama isn't going anywhere near that rate. What a fuck job
Put it in context you one eyed monkey before I teabag u
My view is that Obama is not socialist... But he's slowly falling the slippery steps to socialism, he has no hate for communism. Which is shown in his peace seeks with socialist countries such as Cuba, russia and china. Not that war with these counties are good mind you.
My point was not that "the tax rate is going down". My point is that all 3 of those Republican Presidents taxed the wealthy at a higher rate than Obama proposes.
You are arguing a strawman "point" that I never made asshole.
One of your point in your argument was that the tax rate is naturally going down hence Regan was just doing what was natural. I clearly refuted that point. Now, you're backtracking by saying that wasn't my point.
You said you were done and off to bed. Logic has a way of eating you up. Couldn't go to sleep because of me, right? LOL
Ok, lets dance again.
You don't need to repeat it 10 times, cuz I didn't dispute it 10 times. Read what I write. Your ulcer will go away, I promise. Your argument is falling apart, & now, your facts aren't the argument ya moron.
Name one country? How about the USA in the booming 50s? Eisenhower taxed the wealthy at 91%. It's very well documented. But I guess you think Republican Eisenhower was a socialist too?
I'm sorry if reality conflicts with your fantasy, but these are FACTS. It seems i can't post a link here, but I already sent it to you personally. truthandpolitics has the info.
My right wing friend, will you help me with misterobvious' obvious left wing propaganda? He states under Reagan, Nixon, & Eisenhower the tax rate were at 50%, 77%, & 91% respectively. I thought people like him were your specialty.
Or, you can just remain silent for about a day & I'll try to handle him with my humble knowledge, wisdom, & intelligence.
I'm off to my local tea party demonstration. Two of my close friends are insisting I come. I'm also curious so off I go.
"It's guys like this (Skippy) that gives americans a bad name..."
Like your countrymen from Sweden stood by the side lines during the greatest war ever fought (WWII), us Americans would appreciate if you remained on the side lines & keep your mouth shut concerning anything American.
Keep on name calling. It just proves we're all in a fucked world and we're all fucked up people who can't treat each other well.
Now, if you want to talk calmly and respectfully, I'm open. I hold no judgement, since I'm usually a judgemental bastard myself and I can understand the desire to do so... and I do hope you find a way to be happy in this fucked up world.
Personal property means you literally cannot be in two places at once. You choose the piece of land you love the best and stick with it. The point is that you're not claiming to "own" the land, since that's a joke.. We're a race of animals who've existed for 200,000 years or so. We don't own shit.
As for socialism and anarchism... you're talking about stereotypes. If you like, I can give you some links to more developed theories for the two.
You right-wingnut sheeple who think that Obama is a "socialist" because he wants to raise the tax on millionaires from 35% to 39%...
Are you aware that during the 50s that REPUBLICAN WAR HERO President Eisenhower taxed the rich at 90%? Yes, 90%!
So....was Republican military war hero Eisenhower a "socialist" too?
Have you found a new ridiculous "ism" to throw at Obama this week? You people don't have a CLUE what you're talking about. Which is why you LOST, and why you are so DESPERATE now!
Ok, I think you're confusing me with USAGymnast or Skippy (PB). I'm RoyoirRaw and I don't make up stories. I'm not a political drone enslaved by one or any other party.
Having said that, do you believe in Obama?
Btw, I'll answer your question after I stuff my face w/ some beef briskets.
Now that was an excellent dinner. Anyways, with Obama's 3 trillion $ budget proposal, including the nearly 10 trillion short term debt & 50-70 trillion $ long term liability, how is he not going to raise taxes above 39%?
You do realize those numbers are unsustainable. I simply was using logic and not "making up stories".
Obama is an empty suit. I'm sorry again if the truth offends you.
It's nice that you have a crystal ball to see into the future, but you're SPECULATING. Truth is, NO tax changes take effect until 2011! when taxes on the wealthy return to 39% rate we had under Clinton.
Middle class taxes will LOWER.
Reagan taxed rich at 50% , Nixon at 77% and Eisenhower at 91%!
Social Security, Medicare, Public Schools, Fire Dpt, Public Library are "socialist" programs. Did any GOP Prez., Senator, or Rep. try to get rid of those?
I'm not speculating. Wrong use of the word. Go look up the definition & try to apply what I said.
Unsustainable deficit numbers, not enough gov revenue, hence the need to increase taxes. I'm keeping this simple so you'll understand.
The use of logic is not speculating. It's anything but. Mathematics is the purest form of logic. Therefore let me ask you again, how can Obama not raise taxes?
This thread is too cluttered. I've posted more comments at the bottom of this page
No, you're SPECULATING. You have no idea what he will or will not do. YOU ARE SPECULATING (ie...GUESSING). Look it up asshole.
Obama WILL raise taxes - on the wealthy. In conjunction with large cuts in the defense department fantasy projects and other places, this will make up a large portion of funds needed. It's unlikely that he'll be able to completely balance the budget by the end of his 2nd term(!) but these things have to happen to rectify the Republican DISASTER of the last 8 years
No need to work yourself up like a child. Look, it's called math. Money coming in, money coming out. That must equal, if not you're either in a surplus or a deficit. If the later, interest payments until it gets so big you either have to reduce spending, increase revenue or both. With our deficit we must do both hence a tax increase. Simple logic not speculation which is based on conjectures.
You have no idea what he will or will not do years from now. It's all just speculation by you. You don't have a crystal ball. I refuse to argue about something that has not even happened, except in your head.
But we DO know this much. If you make less than 250k/year you WILL get a tax cut. He HAS said that.
So let's talk about reality not your fantasy world.
Money can come from cutting ridiculous Defense Dept. programs that cost billions.
Your ill-informed misguided idiocy knows no bounds.
Stop listening to Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck and Fox News you moron.
The first no-strings Wall St. bailout went through under BUSH. The massive deficit and economic meltdown happened under the GOP.
The employee free choice act does NOT do away with the secret ballot. REPEAT: does NOT. It gives the option to do it either way - as in BOTH ways, hence the CHOICE.
Pull your head out your ass and move out of your parent's house.
The entire purpose of anarchist or socialist society is that it's ENTIRELY up to you if you want to be a part of it. The main draw to such a society is that each individual is truly equal with his or her peers.
Collectivism is just one aspect, though. Some anarchists and socialists believe in keeping what they grew/made/etc with their own abilities. I refer to personal property, not private property. Keep what you can manage and no more, as opposed to owning land across the country.
Then you have not read Marx. Marx sees a world free of exploitation of labor, and a place of equal rights and living standards that astound the world to this day.
Communism is split up into many philosophies. The form of communism you refer to is "statist communism", such as what the USSR experienced. Many forms of communism/socialism is entirely based on individuals choosing to be a part of such a government. The same goal is part of the anarchist movement. Head over to wikipedia and type in Spanish Revolution for an example.
"Or perhaps 13 year old girls shouldn't be having sex in the first place. "
I never said that but thanks for analyzing my arguments in the worst way possible.
Obviously I would have a problem with things like Muslim societies that stone women for being raped but I don't call them racial slurs like you probably do. Also there you go again with the "liberals are the real racist bigots" argument way to project your faults on too other people.
You don't need to worry about providing the basic necessities of life, only the luxuries. A far more humane system then the ones we pay now. Wage slavery may be an oxymoron, but it exists, then again i can assume you never read Marx's "Wage labor and capital"
Liberty do exploit your fellow man by wage slavery? The Liberty to control the peoples resources and extort payment for the privilege of using that resource? Be specific what kind of capitalist "liberty" you mean.
Why would a Marxist government of the people, take away works of that government? But in YOUR upside down world, yes. However, there does not exist a socialist second republic yet. Force is not ready yet, infiltration is.
There is a higher authority to answer to then "your own money.." The authority of the masses to abolish the wage slave system, and take control of government for all and by all.
That's a fallacy, just because you are not able to understand doesn't mean people don't believe me. Then again, not many people that would believe me would even watch these videos, but I stand up for all of us.
socialist socialist war military abortions porkulus porkulus pork bacon communist teleprompter tax cuts tax cuts bootstraps john galt birth certificate Kenya communist socialist marxist last eight years did not happen small town values illegitimate presidency teleprompter last eight years an illusion america hating dummycrats france europe amero north america union nationalization last days of capitalism I have the worldview of a child militia revolt leftist media
wow raw i am getting my learning at school in political science, and as far as my stutter goes it is a cause of a medical out come when i was eight and had to re-learn to talk, i would hope that your not that hateful to make fun of others just based on a stutter, but then again i would not put it past you or any other person on pbs fan base, if you don't like my vids and what i have to say don't watch them and only watch the propaganda of your g.o.p party and not look into the other sides view.
"...i am getting my learning at school in political science,"
You're getting your learning at school? What 21 yr old college student speaks like that? Oh that's right, poli sci majors from San Francisco.
You stutter because you like it up the ass.
"I would hope that your not that hateful"
1st, it's "you're" not "your", ya moron. 2nd, being a homosexual activist pursuing equality, why would you insult over 1 billion Christians with your JESUSLOVESGAYSEX name?
I just got your personal message regarding my comment above. I rather you post your comments to me in public. I'll wait couple of days for you to do so.
My whole page is upside down and everything is written backwards>>>>>>>>>>> THE WHOLE PAGE. Strange I thought at first I had caught the confinger, conerigger, configure, concave, or what ever the hell.
Hey, 'Buster. We tried to warn people that Obama was a socialist, didn't we?!? (I know I did.)
And with Obama in control, I KNEW Pelosi (and the other Democrat morons) were gonna basically have free reign to do and say all kinds of things serving their own looney social-progressive values, and not in the spirit of the Constitution nor in the best interest of the nation.
"We tried to warn people that Obama was a socialist, didn't we?!? (I know I did.)"
You're a Great American my friend. I for one did more than that. I voted. I debated. I debated face to faceS with chumps & the intellects and not only did I hold my own, but was scorned which meant I did some serious damage.
I'm out of ammo? At least I'm not shooting blanks. You're a Native American? I've never came across one who's so into politics, let alone the Republican party as you.
But if you say so, then so be it. Can we be friends now?
--Again, your comedic comebacks have no flair or irony to make them funny.
"I've never came across
--I'm a native because I was born here. And you MUSt be a Liberal if you think people who are not WASPS couldn't possibly be Conservatives and patriots.
"But if you say so, then so be it. Can we be friends now?"
--Are you being friendly with me now because I made some valid points, or because you feel bad arguing against someone you thought was an Indian?
It did have flair & wit, but irony was not intended. Why do I have to be a liberal to have a realistic view on life? Why couldn't I be a conservative & have the same view? Is it because I don't fall in for Skippy's propagandas like a mindless political drone?
"I'm a native because I was born here:
I don't think Native Americans would agree. Who the hell refers themselves like that anymore? You're either an American or not. Period. That's the GOP talking in you, ya freakin sheep
--You're conversing with one here, and I do agree.
"That's the GOP talking in you, ya freakin sheep"
--HA! You ARE a Liberal. Why would you say that otherwise? Please tell me what other Republican you know of who's said that before. But no, automatically you toss out the ready-made-bomb against Conservatives when someone shows you how wrong you are. So lame.
That means you are a natural born American citizen of any ethnicity. If you had capitalized the letter "N" in "native", it would of meant the indigenous people of North America which we refer to as Native Americans. You can't even get that straight.
"...or because you feel bad arguing against someone you thought was an Indian?"
Now you're Indian? What an idiot...
And yes, I do have flair & wit. You just can't keep up.
--Ummm....I think it's obvious I did get it straight. How can you explain to me exactly what I meant, then tell me I got it wrong? You really ARE a Liberal, aren't you? Wow.
"Now you're Indian? What an idiot..."
--Yes, Indian, what "Native Americans" are also called.
"You just can't keep up"
--Yeah! Yelled from the guy in last place! Good one!
I know what u meant by what u wrote. Just reread my last comment and tell me exactly where I'm in the wrong.
The word "Indian" was incorrectly labeled to Native Americans. Indians are people from the sub continent of Asia in a country known as India.
Now Mr right wing, one sided political buffoon, if u continue w/ ur points while disregarding my accurate & insightful comments, why I say that's a liberal way of thinking.
Ur last comment was pathetic. Take a do over. I insist.
So what? It's wrong. According to you it's been wrong for 400+ years. You're spinning it like a liberal.
"When you do provide such a comment (accurate & insightful), please point it out to me."
What about your error in referring Native Americans as native Americans? Two entirely different things which I clearly explained to you & like a liberal you didn't adhere to simple logical argument.
Congratulations, you're guilty of liberal thinking.
PB it's in the constitution under the new ammendment Obama taped onto the the document it just says 2 things GOVERNMENT & SOCIALISM... or at least the amendment will be there soon.
They are taaking the consitution and twisting it so it is unrecognizable. We let them keep God out of our public life now they want it all. Oh yes they want our money, guns and freedom. This was just 90 days. Can we afford to keep him in there for 4 years?
"They are taaking the consitution and twisting it so it is unrecognizable."
No, they're ignoring the Constitution. Big difference. This way, if someone has the political guts, they can use the Constitution to kick some ass and take down names.
just wanted to say thank propagandabuster for letting me post my vids again, and that i agree with you on this topic...yeah i know this hard to think that but i do, and i posted a vid saying this and why i agree with you, you see even liberals like me can agree with a g.o.p some times.
Listen you moron, where do you think he gets his news? And if he were on TV, he get a lawsuit dropped on his lap for Elmer Fudd copyright infringement.
Listen faggot, you think he gets his news from tv???When did u ever listen fox or cnn calling america USSA or telling the truth for some stuff about Obama...Cunt
First you call me a faggot, then a cunt. You can't even get your name calling straight and you expect me to buy into your warped train of thought? To keep things clear, I'd rather you just stick calling people "arse" you dumb sheep.
I can't say that I agree with everything said. But freedom of speech often ensures that you'll hear something that you don't like.
I've seen worse and everyone practices propaganda in one form or fashion.
So get a grip folks.
Blessings,
David
sidiagung 1 year ago
that flag is wrong, just look up "ussa flag on images"
brettsworld99 1 year ago
Obama is a liar and needs to be stopped in his evil deeds - he wants communism and dictatorship in America!
crazydaysful 1 year ago
It's amazing that morons have access to equipment to spew their views...bloody shame....
PeterMayer 1 year ago
@PeterMayer ------ and leave comments.
PropagandaBuster 1 year ago
Keep up the GREAT work!
lerock1000 2 years ago
Tony-
I like your videos, except some of these about socialism and american politics.
The Japanese government has a LOT of socialist legislation. Look at their healthcare system, taxing system, etc. However, I really love living in Japan and I think what they are doing here is amazing. Why not have a system for healthcare close to Japan's system in the USA? Would that be socialism? Honestly, I can't believe how well it works here. It is extremely cheap and I have great access to healthcare.
harr7959 2 years ago
Is the healthcare run and operated by the government? Are fees set by the government or the market place. I bet they do not have lawyers ready to sue at every turn. How owns the insurance companies?
Also what works good for one nation does not always work good for another.
PropagandaBuster 2 years ago
The Japanese government does not operate the healthcare system. They set all fees in a bi-yearly book that says exactly what can be charged for every procedure. There is a national insurnance company which is compulsary. However, there are hundreds of private companies, and most Japanese carry insurance for dental and other things the government doesn't cover. It is true, they do not have lawyers ready to sue at every turn, which makes a MAJOR difference.
harr7959 2 years ago
Sorry, ran out of room! One more important factor is that almost ALL of the healthcare industry is owned privately. 85% of all hospitals in Japan are owned and operated privately. They are also non-for-profit. The government controls the sallary cap and awards bonuses based on patient reviews of their happiness with the service. So, if patients are happy docs make more money.
harr7959 2 years ago
Very interesting. Thanks for the explaination. Unfortunately due to the lobbyist and lawyers in the USA, what is working in Japan will never work in the USA. Congress has legalized corruption and bribes via the lobbyist system. The lawyers continue to hold the Democrats hostage by being the number one contributor to the Democrats. Washington reeks with corruption worse than any third world thin pot despot control shame of a republic.
PropagandaBuster 2 years ago
congratulations. you are a parody of yourself.
actionbrad 2 years ago
Thank you!
PropagandaBuster 2 years ago
Like the outfit!!!!
bulkfull 2 years ago
forcing us to purchase health insurance is the worst possible thing the government should do. forcing us to buy a product is tyrany.
josephdupont 2 years ago
Wonder if this guy murdered that FED worker over in KY? Teabaggers are now truly deranged people.
RickWarrenisjesus 2 years ago
sutunly lol this guy is retarted
isnt he a cartoon character?
poh98765432 2 years ago
Stewie Gilligan Griffin or Elmer Fudd?
PropagandaBuster 2 years ago
And now, here's Archie Bunker with the news...
spiderbaby1958 2 years ago
Since when is mandatory civic service by youth considered a step towards facism or even communism for that matter?
In Canada, every Ontario high school student must complete 40 hours of community service in order to receive a diploma. Where the service is carried out is optional, and students are not bound to any one location.
This Hitler youth stuff is bullshit.
001savagE 2 years ago
Thank you for illustrating and proving my point.
PropagandaBuster 2 years ago
That does not further your point in any way. I have graduated and I don't walk around doing the jack booted goose step. I'm no far-left nutjob, but your ultra conservative "red scare" crap is too much. Can you say "McCarthy?"
001savagE 2 years ago
See, you did it again. Anthoer "thanks" to you. Oh, about Senator McCarthy: we can use use another one today. Got any suggestions?
PropagandaBuster 2 years ago
If that's how you feel, then lock me up because I'm a communist.
You seem to forget that your country was founded on the progressive ideals of a time called "the Enlightenment." Your current ability to speak your political opinion did not spring up out of the archaic monarchical ways. The first ever democracy required drastic change and must continue to evolve to survive.
Imagine that...
So if you're afraid of a little more liberalism, I suggest you find somewhere else to live. North Korea?
001savagE 2 years ago
Modern liberalism is in no way related to the founding fathers' vision of limited government and personal liberty. It is more closely related to Kim Jong Il and the tyranny of North Korea. Pol Pot Pelosi and Papa Doc Obama have no concern for liberty.
zevon1964 2 years ago
I was trying to make a point. I'm not leaning far left on the political spectrum. I just don't agree with and ultra-conservative approach to anything. Bush fucked your country, now it's Obama's job to fix it. Quite the task if you ask me..
001savagE 2 years ago
I hear you about Bush but Obama's rehashed radical leftism isn't going to fix anything. He'll make the country worse. The answer is more LIBERTY not more statism. Unfortunately, Bush was no libertarian, either.
zevon1964 2 years ago
USA is gone to communist shit! Even we can see that , and it seems like we see alot better than you all. Why are americans oblivious to what is unfolding right in front of them. You all can just ignore it and fall, because with moron in office that is exactly what is happening, just keep that damn border up and dont bring your asses or that communist bullshit up here!
MattNOntario 2 years ago
Not THIS American! I see it VERY WELL and am outraged!!
Frank4268 2 years ago
You're correct. We more socialist than our northern neighbors and it's disgraceful.
zevon1964 2 years ago
Giving loans to people who' deserve' them is what has caused the global meltdown in the banking system and it was Obama and his leftist friends who engineered that one. Now he has his hands on all the power he can really fuck things up. The credit crunch is a walk in the park compared to what he can do now. Still, when he's finished he can no doubt go and bow to Sheik yer Money or whoever it was who paid for his rise to power.
Rundogz 2 years ago 2
hahahahahahahahaha
FunkyFranky99 2 years ago
We are slowly becoming slaves of the new socialist state headed by Czar g. soros, and his puppet , comrade obama. We are doomed unless Republicans can make a comeback in 2012 and reverse the hell that bobo is creating.
joeasmythe 2 years ago
I have to disagree with you. I disagree with you writing "slowly" when it seems rather evident it is a "rapid" decline as they must complete the takeover before the 2010 Congressional elections.
PropagandaBuster 2 years ago
Right, I used the wrong word. Keep up the dood work.
joeasmythe 2 years ago
I agree that we are slowly becoming doomed, but I don't think that a Republican comeback is the solution, (unless it's headed by Ron Paul).
mrbrunelle 2 years ago
Loooool Commie/Russian opera at the beginning. Hilarious lol
Teddyboydan 2 years ago
misterobvious
I see you & USAGymnast are having fun as I knew you two would.
Well, lets pick apart your obvious bias in interpreting those facts. You stated that Regan, Eisenhower, & Nixon taxed at 50%, 91%, & 77% respectively. For now, I only need to discredit one point to bring down your house of cards.
...hmmm....ummm....yes, I'll start with President Reagan.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
Alright asshole...
go to this site and READ the tax stats supplied by the IRS.
Dubya dubya dubya (dot) truthandpolitics (dot) org/top-rates (dot) php
and then please shut the fuck up.
misterobvious 2 years ago
misterobvious
Now I'm an asshole who needs to read up on your sources? Friend, it'll be a cold day in hell when I take lessons from the likes of you.
That should have been obvious to you already.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
I supplied you with CLEAR indisputable stats from the IRS and yet you still are trying some strawman argument about something that I never said.
Face itdude. YOU are WRONG.
I know it hurts. You'll get over it.
misterobvious 2 years ago
Misterobvious
Where have I disputed your facts? Btw, your numbers are off a bit but I'll let that slide.
Read my logical comments. They don't dispute your tax rates. You're confusing me with USAGymnast again, little man.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
You are obviously just upset because you've been proven wrong.
If I were "hiding" something why would i post that link FOUR TIMES?
Go teabag someone.
misterobvious 2 years ago
Misterobvious
You're wrong because you quoted facts out of context. Do you even know what that means? Oh boy...
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
The numbers are NOT "off" at all.
Go argue with reality if you want, but you'll lose.
Go tell the IRS that YOU know better. You're a joke.
misterobvious 2 years ago
misterobvious
You are factually correct that the highest tax rate was 50% under Regan. What you failed to do is put the fact in context, which if you had, you would of presented relevant information. Instead, you just spat out data to push your views.
Regan REDUCED the tax rate from 70% to 50% in 1982. He also REDUCED to marginal tax amount on the highest rate from $212k to $106k. This is called information.
"Regan taxed the wealthy at 50%"
Is called worthless propaganda data.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
DUDE,
OBVIOUSLY if Eisenhower was at 91% and Nixon at 77% the OF COURSE at some point it had to be reduced. DUH. talk about using LOGIC you stupid fuckwad.
The POINT IS that all three were Republicans and ALL THREE still taxed the wealthy at higher rates than Obama plans to do.
WTF do you not understand about that?
misterobvious 2 years ago
misterobvious
Whoa, hold on there lil buddy. My point was your data was useless data to push your warped view. Lets keep it simple and not go off tangent like some people are known for.
You purposely left out relevant information to push your propaganda. Period.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
I left out NOTHING.
My ONLY point was that ALL 3 were Republicans and all 3 taxed the rich at a higher rate than Obama plans to. That's it. It's THAT simple. No "tangent". I supplied the link many times.
Are you retarded?
What the fuck is your problem understanding that?
misterobvious 2 years ago
misterobvious
It's obvious now you don't understand the higher level of debates. You tend, or should I say, are accustomed to school yard discussion with little or no regard to logic, logical procedural or argument, relevant facts, information (not data) within context of debate and so forth.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
You're not making any sense whatsoever,. You're just trying to disguise your ignorance with condescending bullshit.
The numbers don't lie. Read'em and weep asshole.
Goodnight, and good luck.
You'll need it.
misterobvious 2 years ago
For the third time, when did i dispute your tax figures? Man, you are one dumb monkey.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
You are arguing a point with YOURSELF that I never claimed.
Congratulations, you defeated a strawman argument with YOURSELF!
misterobvious 2 years ago
Why do you hate America?
misterobvious 2 years ago
misterobvious
"OBVIOUSLY if Eisenhower was at 91% and Nixon at 77% the OF COURSE at some point it had to be reduced."
There you go again, leaving out relevant information to push your propaganda.
You're a mental midget incapable of logical reasonable debate.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
WHAT the fuck is left out?
You ARE retarded. If it is at 91% in the 50s, and then at 77% under Nixon, and then at 50% under Reagan, then any third grader can see that numbers are going downward.
OF COURSE Republicans are going to lower taxes on the wealthy! We ALL know THAT.
But Obama's tax on the wealthy will STILL be lower than all 3 of those Republican Presidents.
Get it retard?
misterobvious 2 years ago
misterobvious
You cherry pick 3 presidents out of 17 to state the tax rate is going down so Prez Regan wasn't all that. I've got news for you, like your double digit IQ level, the tax rates went up and down depending who was in the office.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
I picked 3 famous REPUBLICANS dumbshit because that was my fucking POINT.
Comparing past tax rates on the wealthy under former REPUBLICAN Presidents to those proposed by Obama in order to debunk these teabagger "socialism" morons. Reagan still taxed the rich at 10% MORE than Obama plans to. and Eisenhower taxed them at 91% during the booming fifties.
WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?
Are all right wingers this fucking stupid?
misterobvious 2 years ago
Hey idiot, like I said before, put it in context. When you compareNixon, Eisenhower, & Regan to Obama's current tax rate, you must compare the preceding year's tax rate for all the respective Presidents. Does that make sense ya monkey? Does it?
No, I'd wager it's going over ur head. How is this moron going to compare 2008's tax rate of 35% to lets say 1981's rate of 70% and say Obama isn't going anywhere near that rate. What a fuck job
Put it in context you one eyed monkey before I teabag u
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
I am saying that many Republicans have taxed the rich more. That's ALLthat I said.
The IRS numbers prove that.
Everything you are talking about is irrelevant to my point because you are trying to skew my point.
If Obama is a "socialist" because of his tax rates on the rich, then those 3 Republicans must be BIGGER "socialists" because they taxed higher.
See how stupid that "logic" is?
misterobvious 2 years ago 2
My view is that Obama is not socialist... But he's slowly falling the slippery steps to socialism, he has no hate for communism. Which is shown in his peace seeks with socialist countries such as Cuba, russia and china. Not that war with these counties are good mind you.
Teddyboydan 2 years ago
My point was not that "the tax rate is going down". My point is that all 3 of those Republican Presidents taxed the wealthy at a higher rate than Obama proposes.
You are arguing a strawman "point" that I never made asshole.
misterobvious 2 years ago
One of your point in your argument was that the tax rate is naturally going down hence Regan was just doing what was natural. I clearly refuted that point. Now, you're backtracking by saying that wasn't my point.
LOL
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
DUDE,
that was NOT my point at all.
YOU brought that up, and i said yes that's very obvious that the numbers go down in sequence . So what?
But that was NOT my point.
Go back and READ what I said. It is CLEARLY spelled out so that even a small child can understand.
"Greater Than" vs. "Less Than"
Republican tax rates of those 3 were GREATER than what Obama proposes.
THAT'S IT. That's the whole entire point. Nothing else.
NOTHING ELSE. See, now wasn't that easy?
misterobvious 2 years ago
shadup already and go to sleep.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
YOU LOSE YOU LOSE YOU LOSE YOU LOSE!
misterobvious 2 years ago
misterobvious
Tell me again where I'm in the wrong without you bitching about teabags?
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
I've explained my point about 10 times now.
You're clearly just pulling my chain because nobody is that stupid.
Oh wait....right wingers are that stupid, I forgot.
I'll give you a pass. Look up "greater than" and "less than" in your second grade math book.
misterobvious 2 years ago
You said you were done and off to bed. Logic has a way of eating you up. Couldn't go to sleep because of me, right? LOL
Ok, lets dance again.
You don't need to repeat it 10 times, cuz I didn't dispute it 10 times. Read what I write. Your ulcer will go away, I promise. Your argument is falling apart, & now, your facts aren't the argument ya moron.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
Dubya dubya dubya (dot) truthandpolitics (dot) org/top-rates (dot) php
misterobvious 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dubya dubya dubya (dot) truthandpolitics (dot) org/top-rates (dot) php
misterobvious 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dubya dubya dubya (dot) truthandpolitics (dot) org/top-rates (dot) php
misterobvious 2 years ago
Dubya dubya dubya (dot) truthandpolitics (dot) org/top-rates (dot) php
misterobvious 2 years ago
I never said i wanted a 91% tax rate. I just pointed out a historical fact under Republican Eisenhower in the 50s.
If you earn over $250,000 you ARE "rich" in comparison to everyone else.
Why do you hate America and the middle class?
misterobvious 2 years ago
You just said that I "made them up", and then I got them from a "left wing site"? Make up your mind.
These stats are in the public record. Do some research.
Do you even CARE that you're wrong?
It's really a mental condition that you have. A refusal to accept any info that conflicts with your delusion.
Well, that's what why the GOP LOST and why they'll be out of power for at least a generation.
misterobvious 2 years ago
I'm so done with you now...
You obviously don't even care about truth or reality.
Which is why your side just got your ASS handed to you.
Now I've got a real life to attend to...you can go finish masturbating now.
misterobvious 2 years ago
oh my god. Prove it or shut the fuck up.
misterobvious 2 years ago
Adding the word "idiot" doesn't change history.
Reagan taxed the wealthy at 50%
Nixon at 77%
Eisenhower at 91%
Those are facts. Sorry if that hurts your brain. I'm done repeating myself.
Finish masturbating now you troll.
misterobvious 2 years ago
Do you drive on the interstate? have you used the post office? Did you go to public school?
misterobvious 2 years ago
Denying the truth doesn't make it disappear man. Sorry.
misterobvious 2 years ago
I already supplied the info to you several times which have chosen to ignore.
It's up to you to disprove at this point.
misterobvious 2 years ago
Taxes are not welfare.
Two different things. Stop talking you're embarrassing yourself.
misterobvious 2 years ago
DUDE. You're really really sad.
The facts are facts.
This is the problem with the right wing. Reality makes them angry and they "project".
misterobvious 2 years ago
Do a search for historical tax rates in the US,
you will find that from 1937 to about 1967 the maximum tax rate was as high as 94%.
A high maximum tax rate that high helps keep greed in check. Educate your self don't that this right wing shit at face value.
Rich1598 2 years ago
Name one country? How about the USA in the booming 50s? Eisenhower taxed the wealthy at 91%. It's very well documented. But I guess you think Republican Eisenhower was a socialist too?
misterobvious 2 years ago
You don't have a clue what you're talking about.
My "proof" is well-documented history.
I'm sorry if reality conflicts with your fantasy, but these are FACTS. It seems i can't post a link here, but I already sent it to you personally. truthandpolitics has the info.
Truth makes you angry doesn't it?
misterobvious 2 years ago
USAGymnast
My right wing friend, will you help me with misterobvious' obvious left wing propaganda? He states under Reagan, Nixon, & Eisenhower the tax rate were at 50%, 77%, & 91% respectively. I thought people like him were your specialty.
Or, you can just remain silent for about a day & I'll try to handle him with my humble knowledge, wisdom, & intelligence.
I'm off to my local tea party demonstration. Two of my close friends are insisting I come. I'm also curious so off I go.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
If we ever get back to where the top tax rate is 90%
which it historically been this country will recover.
Trickle down don't work lets try trickle up.
Rich1598 2 years ago
You too USAGym, check out my Obama video. I know you love him like a uncle.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
It's guys like this that gives americans a bad name...
lehnrik 2 years ago
lehnrik
"It's guys like this (Skippy) that gives americans a bad name..."
Like your countrymen from Sweden stood by the side lines during the greatest war ever fought (WWII), us Americans would appreciate if you remained on the side lines & keep your mouth shut concerning anything American.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
Keep on name calling. It just proves we're all in a fucked world and we're all fucked up people who can't treat each other well.
Now, if you want to talk calmly and respectfully, I'm open. I hold no judgement, since I'm usually a judgemental bastard myself and I can understand the desire to do so... and I do hope you find a way to be happy in this fucked up world.
Dispassionate1 2 years ago
you're a fucking stalker! and more people are finally trusting science now. you superstitious cthulhu freaks will go extinct
jungleman68 2 years ago
Personal property means you literally cannot be in two places at once. You choose the piece of land you love the best and stick with it. The point is that you're not claiming to "own" the land, since that's a joke.. We're a race of animals who've existed for 200,000 years or so. We don't own shit.
As for socialism and anarchism... you're talking about stereotypes. If you like, I can give you some links to more developed theories for the two.
Dispassionate1 2 years ago
"Reminder that Christians and capitalists vote mostly republican, retard. "
A drying breed... :eaglecrying:
Joe402 2 years ago
You right-wingnut sheeple who think that Obama is a "socialist" because he wants to raise the tax on millionaires from 35% to 39%...
Are you aware that during the 50s that REPUBLICAN WAR HERO President Eisenhower taxed the rich at 90%? Yes, 90%!
So....was Republican military war hero Eisenhower a "socialist" too?
Have you found a new ridiculous "ism" to throw at Obama this week? You people don't have a CLUE what you're talking about. Which is why you LOST, and why you are so DESPERATE now!
misterobvious 2 years ago
misterobvious
You do realize Obama isn't going to stop at 39%?
A socialist or not, Obama's an empty suit. I'm sorry if that offends you, but I call 'em as I see 'em.
Btw, check out my Obama vid.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
"Obama isn't going to stop at 39%"? WTF?
And you can read minds or something? Are you a psychic?
So what if he raised it to 50%... LIKE REAGAN?
Or 91%....LIKE EISENHOWER? BOTH REPUBLICAN "HEROES".
Why are MAKING UP these stories anyway?
Why do you care about 5% tax raise on millionaires?
P.S> I heard that Obama was space alien. I read it on the interwebs so it must be true!
misterobvious 2 years ago
misterobvious
"Why are MAKING UP these stories anyway?"
Ok, I think you're confusing me with USAGymnast or Skippy (PB). I'm RoyoirRaw and I don't make up stories. I'm not a political drone enslaved by one or any other party.
Having said that, do you believe in Obama?
Btw, I'll answer your question after I stuff my face w/ some beef briskets.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
misterobvious
Now that was an excellent dinner. Anyways, with Obama's 3 trillion $ budget proposal, including the nearly 10 trillion short term debt & 50-70 trillion $ long term liability, how is he not going to raise taxes above 39%?
You do realize those numbers are unsustainable. I simply was using logic and not "making up stories".
Obama is an empty suit. I'm sorry again if the truth offends you.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
It's nice that you have a crystal ball to see into the future, but you're SPECULATING. Truth is, NO tax changes take effect until 2011! when taxes on the wealthy return to 39% rate we had under Clinton.
Middle class taxes will LOWER.
Reagan taxed rich at 50% , Nixon at 77% and Eisenhower at 91%!
Social Security, Medicare, Public Schools, Fire Dpt, Public Library are "socialist" programs. Did any GOP Prez., Senator, or Rep. try to get rid of those?
Your comments are an "empty suit"!
misterobvious 2 years ago
misterobvious
"Your comment are an "empty suit"!"
Why you...now I'm upset. :)
I'll address your points but I want to see if USAGymnast will first. I do so much like to see him go off the handle.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
misterobvious
I'm not speculating. Wrong use of the word. Go look up the definition & try to apply what I said.
Unsustainable deficit numbers, not enough gov revenue, hence the need to increase taxes. I'm keeping this simple so you'll understand.
The use of logic is not speculating. It's anything but. Mathematics is the purest form of logic. Therefore let me ask you again, how can Obama not raise taxes?
This thread is too cluttered. I've posted more comments at the bottom of this page
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
No, you're SPECULATING. You have no idea what he will or will not do. YOU ARE SPECULATING (ie...GUESSING). Look it up asshole.
Obama WILL raise taxes - on the wealthy. In conjunction with large cuts in the defense department fantasy projects and other places, this will make up a large portion of funds needed. It's unlikely that he'll be able to completely balance the budget by the end of his 2nd term(!) but these things have to happen to rectify the Republican DISASTER of the last 8 years
misterobvious 2 years ago
misterobvious
No need to work yourself up like a child. Look, it's called math. Money coming in, money coming out. That must equal, if not you're either in a surplus or a deficit. If the later, interest payments until it gets so big you either have to reduce spending, increase revenue or both. With our deficit we must do both hence a tax increase. Simple logic not speculation which is based on conjectures.
You sure argue like USAGymnast.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
The point is this...
You have no idea what he will or will not do years from now. It's all just speculation by you. You don't have a crystal ball. I refuse to argue about something that has not even happened, except in your head.
But we DO know this much. If you make less than 250k/year you WILL get a tax cut. He HAS said that.
So let's talk about reality not your fantasy world.
Money can come from cutting ridiculous Defense Dept. programs that cost billions.
misterobvious 2 years ago
I'm keeping this simple so YOU will understand.
SPECULATION
▸ noun: a hypothesis that has been formed by speculating or conjecturing (usually with little hard evidence)
misterobvious 2 years ago
I just DID refute what he said you fucking stupid brain-dead, right-wing sheep.
misterobvious 2 years ago
you guys are the christians so you are retarded. your time is over. you guys tried and failed.
jungleman68 2 years ago
another conservative who doesn't know what he's talking about
jungleman68 2 years ago
Your ill-informed misguided idiocy knows no bounds.
Stop listening to Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck and Fox News you moron.
The first no-strings Wall St. bailout went through under BUSH. The massive deficit and economic meltdown happened under the GOP.
The employee free choice act does NOT do away with the secret ballot. REPEAT: does NOT. It gives the option to do it either way - as in BOTH ways, hence the CHOICE.
Pull your head out your ass and move out of your parent's house.
misterobvious 2 years ago
The entire purpose of anarchist or socialist society is that it's ENTIRELY up to you if you want to be a part of it. The main draw to such a society is that each individual is truly equal with his or her peers.
Collectivism is just one aspect, though. Some anarchists and socialists believe in keeping what they grew/made/etc with their own abilities. I refer to personal property, not private property. Keep what you can manage and no more, as opposed to owning land across the country.
Dispassionate1 2 years ago
"Liberals are bigots while trying to claim that they're tolerant and open minded. "
Reminder that minorities and gays vote mostly democratic.
Joe402 2 years ago
Then you have not read Marx. Marx sees a world free of exploitation of labor, and a place of equal rights and living standards that astound the world to this day.
amsterdam78 2 years ago
Karl Marx has a lot to teach you, if you can't understand him that's fine, neither does the poster of this video.
amsterdam78 2 years ago
what is the song at the end of this vvideo its buetifull
aljilwa 2 years ago
It is an American Civil War song, "The Battle Cry of Freedom."
PropagandaBuster 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out my new video.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
Communism is split up into many philosophies. The form of communism you refer to is "statist communism", such as what the USSR experienced. Many forms of communism/socialism is entirely based on individuals choosing to be a part of such a government. The same goal is part of the anarchist movement. Head over to wikipedia and type in Spanish Revolution for an example.
Dispassionate1 2 years ago
"Or perhaps 13 year old girls shouldn't be having sex in the first place. "
I never said that but thanks for analyzing my arguments in the worst way possible.
Obviously I would have a problem with things like Muslim societies that stone women for being raped but I don't call them racial slurs like you probably do. Also there you go again with the "liberals are the real racist bigots" argument way to project your faults on too other people.
Joe402 2 years ago
You don't need to worry about providing the basic necessities of life, only the luxuries. A far more humane system then the ones we pay now. Wage slavery may be an oxymoron, but it exists, then again i can assume you never read Marx's "Wage labor and capital"
amsterdam78 2 years ago
Liberty do exploit your fellow man by wage slavery? The Liberty to control the peoples resources and extort payment for the privilege of using that resource? Be specific what kind of capitalist "liberty" you mean.
amsterdam78 2 years ago
Why would a Marxist government of the people, take away works of that government? But in YOUR upside down world, yes. However, there does not exist a socialist second republic yet. Force is not ready yet, infiltration is.
amsterdam78 2 years ago
The dictatorship of the proletariat, yes; the dictatorship of one man, no.
amsterdam78 2 years ago
Mankind has every right to put that demand on you. No man is an island unto himself.
amsterdam78 2 years ago
There is a higher authority to answer to then "your own money.." The authority of the masses to abolish the wage slave system, and take control of government for all and by all.
amsterdam78 2 years ago
Im not a Liberal, but left wing people watch these people, because they are a danger to the future of mankind. As all capitalism is against mankind.
amsterdam78 2 years ago
That's a fallacy, just because you are not able to understand doesn't mean people don't believe me. Then again, not many people that would believe me would even watch these videos, but I stand up for all of us.
amsterdam78 2 years ago
Because we are educated enough to see the truth, and altruist's enough to spread what we have learned?
amsterdam78 2 years ago
Yes, being a teacher is not a real job. You people are pathetic, one thing i can say about America is they used to teach respect for academia.
amsterdam78 2 years ago
"I got pregnant at 13..."
Perhaps we should teach more sex education and not abstinence only education?
"Give me housing, give me food, give me a job, give me retirement, give me vacation."
Uhh...those are all reasonable requests? Who wouldn't want those? Wow you guys sure like voting against your own interests.
Also yes Christians are bigots against gay people glad you noticed.
Joe402 2 years ago
not much of a Propaganda Buster are you. you create more Propaganda with each video.
MicrosoftsourceCode 2 years ago
socialist socialist war military abortions porkulus porkulus pork bacon communist teleprompter tax cuts tax cuts bootstraps john galt birth certificate Kenya communist socialist marxist last eight years did not happen small town values illegitimate presidency teleprompter last eight years an illusion america hating dummycrats france europe amero north america union nationalization last days of capitalism I have the worldview of a child militia revolt leftist media
Am I a Republican yet?
Joe402 2 years ago
oops I forgot to include ACORN in there
Joe402 2 years ago
wow raw i am getting my learning at school in political science, and as far as my stutter goes it is a cause of a medical out come when i was eight and had to re-learn to talk, i would hope that your not that hateful to make fun of others just based on a stutter, but then again i would not put it past you or any other person on pbs fan base, if you don't like my vids and what i have to say don't watch them and only watch the propaganda of your g.o.p party and not look into the other sides view.
JESUSLOVESGAYSEX 2 years ago
JESUSLOVESGAYSEX
"...i am getting my learning at school in political science,"
You're getting your learning at school? What 21 yr old college student speaks like that? Oh that's right, poli sci majors from San Francisco.
You stutter because you like it up the ass.
"I would hope that your not that hateful"
1st, it's "you're" not "your", ya moron. 2nd, being a homosexual activist pursuing equality, why would you insult over 1 billion Christians with your JESUSLOVESGAYSEX name?
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
JESUSLOVESGAYSEX
I just got your personal message regarding my comment above. I rather you post your comments to me in public. I'll wait couple of days for you to do so.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
Where do you get all your Sources from?
tucker1677 2 years ago
The Drudge Report on the Internet. Also Google News, plus conservative talk radio.
PropagandaBuster 2 years ago
My whole page is upside down and everything is written backwards>>>>>>>>>>> THE WHOLE PAGE. Strange I thought at first I had caught the confinger, conerigger, configure, concave, or what ever the hell.
Tritonnl 2 years ago
Please send me a message if this buster guy dies, i need a new holiday.
amsterdam78 2 years ago
May I have your email address?
PropagandaBuster 2 years ago
spusaiww(at)gmail(dot)com
amsterdam78 2 years ago
Thank you. I hope to remember to email you just a few seconds before I die.
PropagandaBuster 2 years ago
amamsterdam78
"Please send me a message if this buster (Skippy) guy dies, I need a new holiday."
It's one thing to disagree and/or exchange insults with the guy, but to hungrily await someone's death & say it in public was uncalled for.
I almost feel bad for Skippy...
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
Hey, 'Buster. We tried to warn people that Obama was a socialist, didn't we?!? (I know I did.)
And with Obama in control, I KNEW Pelosi (and the other Democrat morons) were gonna basically have free reign to do and say all kinds of things serving their own looney social-progressive values, and not in the spirit of the Constitution nor in the best interest of the nation.
clhoyt1003 2 years ago
clhoy
"We tried to warn people that Obama was a socialist, didn't we?!? (I know I did.)"
You're a Great American my friend. I for one did more than that. I voted. I debated. I debated face to faceS with chumps & the intellects and not only did I hold my own, but was scorned which meant I did some serious damage.
I'm a GREAT AMERICAN.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
Hey Tony (I mean, Comrade). I love the one about those in DC. HAAA!!! Lesson learned? I hope so, but no betting.
Pelosi doesn't realize our immigration laws were 100 times tougher for more than 100 years. We used to allow only the educated or skilled workers.
The Democraps think spending (on Socialist pet projects) in 2mos 6-7 times what GWB spent in 8yrs is "fixing the economy." ??? Or is it just me?
I need to go. Being fitted for my olive-drab work-suit, & scheduling my re-education.
NoGuff 2 years ago
NoGuff
"We used to allow only the educated or skilled workers."
So how did your parents get in...comrade?
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
"So how did your parents get in...comrade"
--Wow, you're really clever. Not. Is that the best you've got? It's clear you're out of ammo.
FYI: My parents were native Americans, as am I.
NoGuff 2 years ago
NoGuff
I'm out of ammo? At least I'm not shooting blanks. You're a Native American? I've never came across one who's so into politics, let alone the Republican party as you.
But if you say so, then so be it. Can we be friends now?
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
"At least I'm not shooting blanks"
--Again, your comedic comebacks have no flair or irony to make them funny.
"I've never came across
--I'm a native because I was born here. And you MUSt be a Liberal if you think people who are not WASPS couldn't possibly be Conservatives and patriots.
"But if you say so, then so be it. Can we be friends now?"
--Are you being friendly with me now because I made some valid points, or because you feel bad arguing against someone you thought was an Indian?
NoGuff 2 years ago
NoGuff
It did have flair & wit, but irony was not intended. Why do I have to be a liberal to have a realistic view on life? Why couldn't I be a conservative & have the same view? Is it because I don't fall in for Skippy's propagandas like a mindless political drone?
"I'm a native because I was born here:
I don't think Native Americans would agree. Who the hell refers themselves like that anymore? You're either an American or not. Period. That's the GOP talking in you, ya freakin sheep
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
"It did have flair & wit"
--Sorry, no. It was lame.
"I don't think Native Americans would agree"
--You're conversing with one here, and I do agree.
"That's the GOP talking in you, ya freakin sheep"
--HA! You ARE a Liberal. Why would you say that otherwise? Please tell me what other Republican you know of who's said that before. But no, automatically you toss out the ready-made-bomb against Conservatives when someone shows you how wrong you are. So lame.
NoGuff 2 years ago
NoGuff
"My parents were native Americans, as am I"
That means you are a natural born American citizen of any ethnicity. If you had capitalized the letter "N" in "native", it would of meant the indigenous people of North America which we refer to as Native Americans. You can't even get that straight.
"...or because you feel bad arguing against someone you thought was an Indian?"
Now you're Indian? What an idiot...
And yes, I do have flair & wit. You just can't keep up.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
"You can't even get that straight"
--Ummm....I think it's obvious I did get it straight. How can you explain to me exactly what I meant, then tell me I got it wrong? You really ARE a Liberal, aren't you? Wow.
"Now you're Indian? What an idiot..."
--Yes, Indian, what "Native Americans" are also called.
"You just can't keep up"
--Yeah! Yelled from the guy in last place! Good one!
NoGuff 2 years ago
I know what u meant by what u wrote. Just reread my last comment and tell me exactly where I'm in the wrong.
The word "Indian" was incorrectly labeled to Native Americans. Indians are people from the sub continent of Asia in a country known as India.
Now Mr right wing, one sided political buffoon, if u continue w/ ur points while disregarding my accurate & insightful comments, why I say that's a liberal way of thinking.
Ur last comment was pathetic. Take a do over. I insist.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
"The word "Indian" was incorrectly labeled to Native Americans"
--So what? It's a use of the word, and has been for 400+ years. I was just pointing out your hypocrisy.
"if u continue w/ ur points while disregarding my accurate & insightful comments"
--When you do provide such a comment, please point it out to me.
NoGuff 2 years ago
Comment removed
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So what? It's wrong. According to you it's been wrong for 400+ years. You're spinning it like a liberal.
"When you do provide such a comment (accurate & insightful), please point it out to me."
What about your error in referring Native Americans as native Americans? Two entirely different things which I clearly explained to you & like a liberal you didn't adhere to simple logical argument.
Congratulations, you're guilty of liberal thinking.
Btw, check out my vids & leave some comments.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
You mean, you'll keep this up until they finally shut you down and implement the Internet 2.
Until then, keep on shouting it out!
maggoli67 2 years ago
PB it's in the constitution under the new ammendment Obama taped onto the the document it just says 2 things GOVERNMENT & SOCIALISM... or at least the amendment will be there soon.
segmentum 2 years ago
I sense a radio talk show host!
Warchief1521 2 years ago
They are taaking the consitution and twisting it so it is unrecognizable. We let them keep God out of our public life now they want it all. Oh yes they want our money, guns and freedom. This was just 90 days. Can we afford to keep him in there for 4 years?
AJSensei 2 years ago
AJSensei
"They are taaking the consitution and twisting it so it is unrecognizable."
No, they're ignoring the Constitution. Big difference. This way, if someone has the political guts, they can use the Constitution to kick some ass and take down names.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
just wanted to say thank propagandabuster for letting me post my vids again, and that i agree with you on this topic...yeah i know this hard to think that but i do, and i posted a vid saying this and why i agree with you, you see even liberals like me can agree with a g.o.p some times.
JESUSLOVESGAYSEX 2 years ago
excellent video!
1stlist 2 years ago
Man PB should have his own show on tv! 5/5
fuUuckCCP 2 years ago
fuUuckCCP
"Man PB should have his own show on tv! 5/5"
Listen you moron, where do you think he gets his news? And if he were on TV, he get a lawsuit dropped on his lap for Elmer Fudd copyright infringement.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
Why have you resurfaced as another user?
Read your name from right to left, and what do you get?
Once a troll- always a troll [laugh]
ariaane 2 years ago
ariaane
"Read your name from right to left, and what do you get?"
You figured that out with Skippy's help? Does he also help you unzip your pants in the bathroom too?
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
ariaane
"Once a troll- always a troll [laugh] "
You ought to know.
WhyDidYouGoAndDoThat 2 years ago
Listen faggot, you think he gets his news from tv???When did u ever listen fox or cnn calling america USSA or telling the truth for some stuff about Obama...Cunt
fuUuckCCP 2 years ago
fuUuckCCP
First you call me a faggot, then a cunt. You can't even get your name calling straight and you expect me to buy into your warped train of thought? To keep things clear, I'd rather you just stick calling people "arse" you dumb sheep.
RoyoirRaw 2 years ago
lol i saw your profile and everybody hate you even PB, and u call me a sheep?ROFL you are supporting communism so u are the greatest sheep ever!
fuUuckCCP 2 years ago