my stang has hipo 289 heads closed chamber 11.1 compression with 2.02 chevy intake valves and 1.95 exaust valves it hits 7500 rpm, its just a 1969 302 block bored 30 over, balanced and blue printed with a fireball crane cam and flowtech headers and 650cfm carter carb, i estimate around 390hp and 370tq at the lowest, havent got to dyno it yet.
Yes well It is my dads car and I'm only 16. So that's why I don't have one. But in the next ten years I will be making 6 figures easily so fuck you. whats your car a fox shit-stang? poor piece of shit.
Umm... the fox chassis Mustang is the Best Mustang body made. I own three, all powerhouses and anyone thats a true Mustang fan knows that, those are the ONLY bodys Ford made that can hold a 460 with NO mods to the car, it just drops right in and can withstand 600 horse without twisting with just subframe and strut tower connectors. Ford did it just right when they came out with the Fox chassis.
Ok honestly the mustang died on about 1973 then was revived in 2005.. everything from 74 to 1994 were absolute shit! then 1995 to 2004 they were OK but the fox mustangs were fucking ugly... see, my dads 69' GT350 could own that piece of shit & you know it!!!!!!
Are you a moron? The Fox Body was the FASTEST stock mustang, the 5.0 had the lightest body and the smartest design, it is an American classic and DEFINITELY a true mustang.
Ok look biach. the fox body sucks. yes, its got great power and stats but what makes a great muscle car is power and looks jackass. these cars don't fit into the equation.
You're still a moron. These cars are GORGEOUS, the fox is a sexy mother fucking car. You just have poor taste in muscle, you like the new mustangs? They're fucking hideous. The 1994-2000 models were horrid, the 2000-2004 models were gorgeous and then the 2005-present are giant bulbous replica's of the 1967's but way uglier and with far less power. The new mustangs are shitty.
Erm. You might be the moron without money. The new mustangs deliver far more power and look as good as the old ones. The fox mustangs make a good drag car and that's it jackass. HAHA! that's why you don't see them at classic cars shows because they are SHIT and you people defend them because it seems to be the only thing you can afford, but don't bring your hatred on me.
lol, a 1993 FOX BODY mustang 5.0 in good condition casts around 11,000 or more depending on the body. You can get a 94-1999 mustang in great condition for much less. The new mustangs do NOT deliver more power. Not even kind of.
See whats funny that you probably don't know that the new mustangs run on the same block as the fox mustang did as well. Secondly An average mustang 05-10 GT produces roughly between 300-and 400 horse power stock. The new mustang have 5.3 litre powerplant with improved air intake. They are far faster. than the fox's ever were stock.
No what's funny is that you don't realize I know that, but the body of the fox's are way lighter, meaning more speed. The new mustangs are like tanks and need the extra power to make them anywhere near as capable as the fox.
Yes they might be lighter, but that doesn't allow more speed. Aerodynamics play the largest role in a cars speed. Of course you know that the fox mustang is shaped much like a box and carries an ASSLOAD of drag with it. The mustang has flowing curves, high profile hood( to deflect air resistance) & ventilation that begins in the front grille and exist via flow terminals under the rear rockers and bumper. why argue with me when you know that the battle is all lost?
wow you must be a complete fuckin moron , the weight has eveything to do with faster speed, have you ever heard of power to weight ratio, and aerodynamics dont mean shit unless you run 150 mph + you fucktard! just because you have a body kit and a wing dont mean your fast in all reality you make it slower by adding that junk shit because of weight induction.... learn about physics before you run your teenage mouth.
ok ok here we go buddy the 05-09 produce 300hp and 320tq stock the 2010 mustang produces 315 hp and 325tq stock..they both have the 4.6 and the cobra (gt500) have a 5.4 supercharged moter with 500hp 475tq also none of them have a 5.3 motor (doesnt even exist) in 2012 ford is gonna put a new 5.0 with 400hp and 400tq in the mustang
thats why fox body mustangs are so awesome.. They look so simple compared to other mustangs but they are also the lightest and can be made the fastest with the least amount of money compared to other models of mustangs.
u know i lik it n all but ford realy fucked up on the 80's with the design for the mustang its nuthin lik the 70's the 60's the present but i lik it still
thanks...i have since idled er down...this vid was a day after first getting the motor rebuilt... thanks and hopefully ull get another vid posted...id like to see what it looks like in the light and what she sounds like
my stang has hipo 289 heads closed chamber 11.1 compression with 2.02 chevy intake valves and 1.95 exaust valves it hits 7500 rpm, its just a 1969 302 block bored 30 over, balanced and blue printed with a fireball crane cam and flowtech headers and 650cfm carter carb, i estimate around 390hp and 370tq at the lowest, havent got to dyno it yet.
sedvillemo 2 years ago
x-pipe
killpeople20 2 years ago
2.02 chevrolet valves..cant be an e7 head what heads are they??351??
82hotrod 2 years ago
that sounds cool but it looks ugly
skater866ss 2 years ago
LoL that thing is sqaure, slow, & UGLY!
Sarcasticscum 2 years ago
I think Sarcasticscums comment when he says "see, my dads 69' GT350 could own that piece of shit & you know it!!!!!!" Sums her up completly!!!!
My Daddys Car!!!!! LMAO TWAT
emster73 2 years ago 2
Yes well It is my dads car and I'm only 16. So that's why I don't have one. But in the next ten years I will be making 6 figures easily so fuck you. whats your car a fox shit-stang? poor piece of shit.
Sarcasticscum 2 years ago
i hope your rich little family loses everything and are donated a fox mustang just to laugh at you
YungFeti 2 years ago
Ha, fat chance of that happening loser! xD
Sarcasticscum 2 years ago
Wow i cant believe people consider these models actually mustangs.... sad... -_-
Sarcasticscum 3 years ago
Umm... the fox chassis Mustang is the Best Mustang body made. I own three, all powerhouses and anyone thats a true Mustang fan knows that, those are the ONLY bodys Ford made that can hold a 460 with NO mods to the car, it just drops right in and can withstand 600 horse without twisting with just subframe and strut tower connectors. Ford did it just right when they came out with the Fox chassis.
Blackwolf460 3 years ago
Dude I was talking about the looks of the car.. damn I could care less about its performance specs..
Sarcasticscum 3 years ago
Who cares about LOOKS! If you have a car that is "nice" but no power what's the use...?
jaymullink 3 years ago
Ok honestly the mustang died on about 1973 then was revived in 2005.. everything from 74 to 1994 were absolute shit! then 1995 to 2004 they were OK but the fox mustangs were fucking ugly... see, my dads 69' GT350 could own that piece of shit & you know it!!!!!!
Sarcasticscum 3 years ago
Are you a moron? The Fox Body was the FASTEST stock mustang, the 5.0 had the lightest body and the smartest design, it is an American classic and DEFINITELY a true mustang.
You dumb CUNT
Can't be a mustang lover without loving the fox
williamhenkel 2 years ago
Ok look biach. the fox body sucks. yes, its got great power and stats but what makes a great muscle car is power and looks jackass. these cars don't fit into the equation.
Sarcasticscum 2 years ago
You're still a moron. These cars are GORGEOUS, the fox is a sexy mother fucking car. You just have poor taste in muscle, you like the new mustangs? They're fucking hideous. The 1994-2000 models were horrid, the 2000-2004 models were gorgeous and then the 2005-present are giant bulbous replica's of the 1967's but way uglier and with far less power. The new mustangs are shitty.
Best years for mustangs, 1965-1993 and 2001-2004
williamhenkel 2 years ago
Erm. You might be the moron without money. The new mustangs deliver far more power and look as good as the old ones. The fox mustangs make a good drag car and that's it jackass. HAHA! that's why you don't see them at classic cars shows because they are SHIT and you people defend them because it seems to be the only thing you can afford, but don't bring your hatred on me.
Sarcasticscum 2 years ago
lol, a 1993 FOX BODY mustang 5.0 in good condition casts around 11,000 or more depending on the body. You can get a 94-1999 mustang in great condition for much less. The new mustangs do NOT deliver more power. Not even kind of.
williamhenkel 2 years ago
See whats funny that you probably don't know that the new mustangs run on the same block as the fox mustang did as well. Secondly An average mustang 05-10 GT produces roughly between 300-and 400 horse power stock. The new mustang have 5.3 litre powerplant with improved air intake. They are far faster. than the fox's ever were stock.
Sarcasticscum 2 years ago
No what's funny is that you don't realize I know that, but the body of the fox's are way lighter, meaning more speed. The new mustangs are like tanks and need the extra power to make them anywhere near as capable as the fox.
williamhenkel 2 years ago
Yes they might be lighter, but that doesn't allow more speed. Aerodynamics play the largest role in a cars speed. Of course you know that the fox mustang is shaped much like a box and carries an ASSLOAD of drag with it. The mustang has flowing curves, high profile hood( to deflect air resistance) & ventilation that begins in the front grille and exist via flow terminals under the rear rockers and bumper. why argue with me when you know that the battle is all lost?
Sarcasticscum 2 years ago
wow you must be a complete fuckin moron , the weight has eveything to do with faster speed, have you ever heard of power to weight ratio, and aerodynamics dont mean shit unless you run 150 mph + you fucktard! just because you have a body kit and a wing dont mean your fast in all reality you make it slower by adding that junk shit because of weight induction.... learn about physics before you run your teenage mouth.
sedvillemo 2 years ago
ok ok here we go buddy the 05-09 produce 300hp and 320tq stock the 2010 mustang produces 315 hp and 325tq stock..they both have the 4.6 and the cobra (gt500) have a 5.4 supercharged moter with 500hp 475tq also none of them have a 5.3 motor (doesnt even exist) in 2012 ford is gonna put a new 5.0 with 400hp and 400tq in the mustang
badtothebone07stang 2 years ago
Ok.. you have just replied to a video I forgot I commeted on so whatever... lol
Sarcasticscum 2 years ago
so fuckin true dude ! 65- 93 was the best stangs ever , then the terminator came!
sedvillemo 2 years ago
thats why fox body mustangs are so awesome.. They look so simple compared to other mustangs but they are also the lightest and can be made the fastest with the least amount of money compared to other models of mustangs.
qwerty6801 2 years ago
Sounds like a hit miss motor. Either bad sound or ???
jsusisaliv 3 years ago
dude thats awesome i got an 80 too its a 4 banger but worked
sylusmk2 3 years ago
yea thanks... was orginally a four banger but i built the 308 u hear in it now
308mustang 3 years ago
what duration cam?
f0rdman 3 years ago
NOT A MUSTANG
jmanfake60 3 years ago
how so?
Pringle15 3 years ago
you dumb fuck
scarface7654 3 years ago
u know i lik it n all but ford realy fucked up on the 80's with the design for the mustang its nuthin lik the 70's the 60's the present but i lik it still
protocaldroid117 3 years ago
Idle her down and lets here that cam lope, great Car BTW!!
stangcrazy306 3 years ago
thanks...i have since idled er down...this vid was a day after first getting the motor rebuilt... thanks and hopefully ull get another vid posted...id like to see what it looks like in the light and what she sounds like
308mustang 3 years ago
Sweet ride!! I have "79" since new.
Bluesitup1967 4 years ago
thanks...have you done any mods to it or not
308mustang 4 years ago