Fort Hood Shootings: Army Officer to Jihadist Killer

[Valladega]

Isn't it hard when good white christian americans have happen to the them the types of things that happen to people all over the world, every day?

[billyshearsnot]

Not all muslims are terrorists; a few of them are rug merchants.

[simsek03]

Those comments were pretty fucking great

[dlsofsetx]

Religion of peace.

[LiberalHuntingSeason]

Isn't DIEversity wonderful?

[rodlares03]

we cannot trust muslims. they are traitor they think they are the best but in reality they are the most backward people on earth. and they love to fuck even men in their anus and that is their culture.

[MultiRippleeffect]

@rodlares03 was wondering after two years you still retarded

[LiquidCloth]

This guy KNEW & PLANNED it. He was NOT crazy, he's a Muslim jihadist doing what millions of Muslims do world over...and doing it for AND in the name of his so-called ''god'' allah. What a wonderful ''KILLology'' to live AND die by.

[valmont2044]

Right. He had to know that he might fight muslims. He chose to join the Army, to become an officer, a psychiatrist(!) he chose not to resign or even face military trial. He chose to follow the Quran, he chose to kill. This has nothing to do with ethics, it is sheer murder. It is islam at its best!

[rodlares03]

hassan when you meet your allah he will let you fuck his ass. that will be your prize from allah.

[wyecee]

See what happens if you put Humpty Dumpty back together? Claimed 13 hostages. This sniper gets lethal injection. He won't fall and break himself in half again.

[plaidnum]

Remove all Muslims from the US military immediately. Dont make your men & women "wonder" if the person who has their back is going to stab it some day.

[littleismail]

People in the Army stab each other in the back, regardless

[plaidnum]

...still

[merceratus36]

@littleismail=Faggot

[wideawake123]

Let's all remember what's important here...no Qurans were injured in this incident.

[drumier]

torture this monkey on live tv

[NoDhimmiJimmi]

Being "born a Muslim" is the false claim for all mankind's obligation to allah and Islam. Rejecting the obligation makes all "infidels" enemies of allah, muhammed, Islam, etc. How ludicrous this is. That had to come from the mind of a madman.

[BurningKoran]

No one is born a muslim, thats just bullshit. Its just as true to say that everyone is born a jew or christian.

Religons are not part of our genetics, only muslims cant seem to understand that.

Thats why they call anyone who dislikes islam a racist.

[freespeech]

Americans are awake. The problem is over 50% of the people in this country elected Barack HUSSEIN Obama. Not one of them is a American. The people who voted for Barack HUSSEIN Obama are the ones who want to CHANGE America.

[Mobee211]

I couldn't have said it better myself! B HUSSEIN Obama is not himself an American.  I was an Independant voter but I am now FUMING mad and you know what? So are lots of other people. Americans are not going to stand for what this idiot with his meaningless rhetoric is doing to our Country!

[freespeech]

Now that Fort Hood shooter Nidal Malik Hasan is alive do you think Obama will invite him to the White House for a beer with his victims?

[XXXxThemessiahxXXX]

Death to Islam! It is time we all kill Islam and its barbaric satanic death cult. We don't need more wars in the world and in the middle east. Al-Qaida, Hamas, Hezbollah and all the terrorism world wide are done by muslims why is that? The atheists are right about Islam as a death cult and so are ex-muslims. Please people listen to Geert Wilders what he says on Fitna. Reject Islam vigorously for it is a barbaric violent totalitarian fascist radical ideology.

[savage7477]

any fucking religion that thinks god is great when there is a killing is a fucking retard and i hope they hang that fuck head

[meggy8868]

If you are serious about Islam (it might be possible to be a Muslim with a dusty Quran) but at the very core of Islam is death: to the Kuffar (anyone not a muslim), to Israel, to America, with the goal of dominating the World. The Koran, the Hadith and the Sunah of Mohammad all demand the same. Americans are singulariy ignorant about Islam. England is catching on.

[aartyo]

and jet al those muslims say...... Islam is a religion of peace... wel you know what ,,, relegion of peace MY ASS..

[capone70]

More Mohammedan madness. Mohammedans are like ferral cats; you can feed them, even allow them in your house, but they will still scratch or bite you and urinate everywhere. And whereas a ferral cat will at least rid your home of mice, I am at a loss as to why we need Mohammedans in this country.

[CRAPCANNONS]

Hasan is not a convert.

He was born a Muslim.

Shepard Smith is wrong.

[italianchappy]

I've just read on an italian newspaper he was a palestinian. The last thing media like to notice. He will become a pacifist shrink stressed by the sad stories of soldiers back from irak wanting to alleviate their sorrors by shooting them dead.

[RationalConclusion]

Nobody is born a muslim.

[CRAPCANNONS]

What a stunningly twatish bit of nothing your statement is.

1st, it rivals Obama's by granting inappropriate priority to unimportant details.

2nd, it passive-aggressively seeks to dissimulate that there is a distinction between a. recent converts, and b. those born into a religion by geography and/or culture.

Your petty hairsplitting on the word `born' to make a point that genes and memes are not 'linked' is a sad excuse to simply grant yourself authority that you don't have and never will.

[RationalConclusion]

First of all learn some manners and respect.

Secondly, you said that Hasan was born a muslim. He was not. Nobody is born a with a religious faith or belief. If you didn't mean it literally then you didn't mean it literally. The thing is that many people do believe that children are literally born muslim, christian etc and the comment that you made gave that impression also.

Passive-aggressive? Grant myself authority? I have no idea what you're talking about.

[CRAPCANNONS]

RationalConclusion - 1

First of all learn some manners and respect

Pfff. Er... really? On what authority? Thank goodness you dont have to say that to me in person, right?

I owe you nothing, least of all respect. You haven't earned it, even with the fancy name. You're just another pseudo-Thunderfoot twat mistaking their recent hard-on for atheism as wisdom. You're a sad, boring one-issue drone.

[RationalConclusion]

Grow up.

[CRAPCANNONS]

RationalConclusion response "Grow up" = pure FAIL

[RationalConclusion]

If you have something constructive to say I am all ears.

[CRAPCANNONS]

RationalConclusion - 2

"Nobody is born a with a religious faith"

Gosh, really? Wow. Are you sure? Did you see that on Nat Geo or something? Do you enjoy saying inanely obvious things to yourself in the mirror? Does it make you feel shmart, darling?

"the comment that you made gave that impression..." Mhm. And we should care about your lazy `impressions because...?

[RationalConclusion]

I repeat some people do literally believe that children are born muslim, christian, jew etc etc so it is in fact not obvious.

You obviously prefer to talk in a childlike manner rather than have a mature conversation.

I urge you to grow up.

[CRAPCANNONS]

RationalConclusion - 3

"Grant myself authority?"

You call yourself `RationalConclusion. You are clearly so out of touch with the impression you make, so high off your own flatulence that you dont realize how laughable you are. You are not Wittgenstein. Nor Chomsky. And you never will be.

Now as fun as it was to bitchslap around a drooly twat like you with their own nerf bat, you have managed to bore me. Good luck selling your whole `RationalConclusion fraud.

Twat.

[RationalConclusion]

I notice you avoided explaining what you meant by the comment that you made and why you made it.

You obviously don't know yourself!

[CRAPCANNONS]

RationalDelusion

"I notice you avoided explaining what you meant by the comment that you made and why you made it."

Reread the first response to you, genius. You are intellectually soft and lack important capacities of analysis. Not to mention a terrible debater.

Truth is you KNEW I meant conversion vs cultural. You were merely looking for an in to grant yourself the authority to police `logical/linguistic fallacies'. To make yourself feel shmart, right?

Change your name. At least be honest.

[RationalConclusion]

I said that nobody is born a muslim (which is true) and from those few words you somehow "deduced" that I was being "passive-aggressive" and "granting myself authority". I have no idea how you jumped to those conclusions.

For the second time CRAPCANNONS I accept that you did not mean it literally however you comment certainly did not give that impression. Some people do believe that children are literally born muslim and I thought that you were one of them. Understand?

[CRAPCANNONS]

RationalDelusion

"I said that nobody is born a muslim (which is true)" - I'm sure you were desperately hoping to get into a debate with the cliched buck-toothed cross-eyed racist redneck where, from on high, you could impart your great wisdom to. Clearly you brought a nerf bat to a gun fight.

"I accept that you did not mean it literally" - You do NOW only because proof forced you to retract your false 'you avoided explaining what you meant' remark, either an oversight on your part or a lie.

[RationalConclusion]

"I'm sure you were desperately hoping to get into a debate with the cliched buck-toothed cross-eyed racist redneck where, from on high, you could impart your great wisdom to. Clearly you brought a nerf bat to a gun fight."

I was hoping to get a mature response. Unfortunately I didn't get one.

[RationalConclusion]

"You do NOW only because proof forced you to retract your false 'you avoided explaining what you meant' remark, either an oversight on your part or a lie."

No. I accept the fact that you didn't literally mean that children are born muslim because you've explained that you didn't however the comments that you made in your original response to me in relation to being "passive-aggressive" and granting myself authority I do not accept and I still do not know how you came to that conclusion.

[CRAPCANNONS]

RationalDelusion

"Some people do believe that children are literally born muslim and I thought that you were one of them."

This discussion is tiresome. Your position is built on a straw man. So who are you debating exactly? Who are these people who don't know genes from memes?

If this were a funeral i'd have you thrown out. Like your 'president', you're less interested in honoring this tragedy than scoring petty debate points, and even THAT you failed at.

Now go back to Amazing Atheist.

[RationalConclusion]

For the third time. I'm going to put this as simple as I can for you.

1 You said that children were born muslim.

2 When reading your comment I thought that you meant it literally.

3 I responded by saying that no child is born muslim.

3 You responded and cleared up the fact that you don't believe that children are literally born muslim but are rather born into muslim families.

5 I accept your response with regard to this.

Now. Do you understand?

[CRAPCANNONS]

RationalDelusion

You poor thing. This is so difficult for you isn't it?

I understood your above bullet points from the very instant i read your first stunningly twattish bit of nothing statement. What followed was just for the pleasure of reaming your floundering carcass with your own blinkered obtuse logic.

What we did in fact succeed in establishing was that the misunderstanding was all YOURS. Despite your attempts at a Rational Conclusion you are want of finding one without assistance.

[RationalConclusion]

Yet more childish insults.

You sound incredibly upset. You must be extremely sensitive.

Firsltly what "blinkered obtuse logic"? How exactly have I been obtuse or illogical?

Secondly my misunderstanding was down to your misleading comment.

[CRAPCANNONS]

RationalDelusion

Lastly, you failed to provide one iota of tangible credible evidence that there are in fact those who believe people are born with `religious genes'.

Until you provide this evidence, upon which your entire argument is based, you will have in fact proved that your were making a straw man argument.

You would then have to prove why you rushed to the conclusion that i was one of these people when you in fact refused to consider the a and b choices that were evidently at issue.

[RationalConclusion]

There are some people who do believe that for instance a child of muslim parents is born a muslim child. That the child is innately muslim.

I was debating a young man not so long ago via email who thought exactly that.

Even if there wern't any it doesn't change the fact that you said "he was born muslim".

[CRAPCANNONS]

RationalDelusion

Mhm. So you talked to a guy once somewhere on the internets. Well sounds like a mountain of evidence to me. Case closed i guess...

There's clearly something wrong with you. Unprepared to conduct any kind of debate (aside from imaginary retarded adolescents who don't understand genetics), you also have some kind of blind spot, an autistic fixation with words without allowing for any of the rules of language and communication to apply. Debates are between people, not words.

[RationalConclusion]

I spoke to a young man who believed that he was born a muslim. I debated with him via email.

Here's another example. Look for the video "I am a Muslim Yusuf İslam"Everybaby is born as a Muslim."

Even if I hadn't have previously heard of anyone who believes that children are born muslim it does not change your original comment so it is beside the point.

I am all for a mature debate. Unfortunately your repetetive immature and asinine comments are inhibiting one from going ahead.

[RationalConclusion]

Here's another example. Search for the video entitled "Everybody is born a muslim". Proof positive that there are people who believe that children are born muslim.

[CRAPCANNONS]

RationalDelusion - A

You may have noticed that i have been calling you names like obtuse, flatulent, twattish, etc. These insults are based on previous experiences with others like you. I am therefore also using them as evidence to support MY argument that you are the same. Is that ok?

No. Using as evidence some imbeciles who barely speak English does not strengthen your argument but in fact weakens it.

Example...

[RationalConclusion]

No that is not okay.

The reason why I thought that you believed that children are born muslim was not just based on previous experiences with others. It was primarily based on your original comment "He was born muslim". This combined with the fact that I have previously spoken to people who believe this is what made your comment appear literal.

I've now given you two videos proving that there are people who believe that children are born muslim. How exactly does this weaken my argument?

[CRAPCANNONS]

RationalDelusion - B

ME: "The sun's going down"

YOU: "That's an optical illusion of perspective. The sun isn't going anywhere.

ME: "Yeah no shit Sherlock. Everyone i spoke to knows exactly what i mean."

YOU: "Well i spoke to a moron last week on the internets who thinks the sun orbits the earth; ergo, you must be the same type of person"

ME: "wow you're a twat..."

ETCETERA...

Also, you are still lying by omission by not acknowledging the true dichotomy created by my first statement.

[RationalConclusion]

Grow up. I've explained to you in detail exactly why I thought you were talking literally.

If you said "the sun is going down" I would not pick on your use of language because it is a well known figure of speech and is obvously not meant to be taken literally.

To say "He was born muslim" is not a well known figure of speech and is therefore not obvious as to whether it is meant to be literally.

How exactly am I "lying"?

[CRAPCANNONS]

RationalDelusion

"How exactly am I lying?"

By seeking to dissimulate that there is an clear difference between 1. recent converts, and 2. those `born into' a religion by geography/culture.

This 3rd, exotic interpretation that you seem fixated on, only appears to exist in your mind since your two examples are not credible/common enough to bear weight.

You know that, in the framed context of this video, there are only choices 1. and 2. yet actively CHOOSE to only conjure this unlikely 3rd one.

[RationalConclusion]

I haven't tried to dissimulate anything. Of course there's a difference between those who convert and those who are born into a religion. How exactly was I "lying"?

I have proved that there are people who believe that children are born muslim. You obviously just don't want to accept it. It looks to me as though you're one of those people who has a big problem with accepting that you were wrong.

[CRAPCANNONS]

RationalDelusion

You are lying by omission by not acknowledging the true dichotomy in my first statement

You dissimulate that there is a clear difference b/w

1 converts, vs

2 those `born into' religion by geography/culture

the 3rd exotic `meme-gene you fixate on appears to exist only in your mind since your two examples are not common enough to be credible

You KNOW, in the context of this video, that there are only those two choices yet actively try to only conjure this absurd 3rd one

[RationalConclusion]

Your arguments are totally flawed.

1 Firstly the commonality of the belief that children are born muslim is completely irrelevent. The point is that the belief exists. Even if I had never heard of this belief your "He was born muslim" comment alone was reason for me to think that that's what you believe.

2 The examples which I gave are proof that this belief is not some idea I dreamed up but is believed by others.

[CRAPCANNONS]

RationalDelusion

You have earned the Intellectual Laziness award of the year. Congrats.

1. you jumped, in this context, to a false conclusion

2. you backed off when evidence was presented

3. you defend your false conclusion with dubious, inconclusive, unconvincing hearsay examples, ergo NO PROOF

4. then, your argument having broken down, are reduced to the most childish schoolyard "you don't want to admit you're wrong"

You must be insufferable in real life. How can you stand yourself?

[RationalConclusion]

1 If I jumped to a false conclusion it was due to your false "He was born muslim" comment.

2 What evidence? How have I backed off? If anything it is you who has backed off when I supplied the evidence!

3 I've supplied two videos. I didn't need to anyway because as I said before your misleading comment alone was reason enough for me to conclude that that is what you believed.

4 You're calling me childish? If you cannot see the hypocrisy in that you must be either blind or stupid.

[CRAPCANNONS]

1 He WAS `born muslim', to the extent that he was not a convert but born into a muslim family. There exists no 3rd choice, other than your invention.

2 you retracted your initial position

3 your "evidence" of 2 videos simply isn't enough and would be thrown out of court. you are lazy and don't care.

4 i make no pretense of being an authority of any kind. But the humorless delusional arrogance to grandiloquently name oneself `Rational Conclusion' renders your childishness all the more ironic

[RationalConclusion]

1 I agree that he was born into a muslim family and I also agree that nobody is born muslim. The fact remains that you said "He was was born muslim". This belief is not "my invention" as I have proved with the videos.

2 The retract that I thought you thought children are born muslim? Yes I did. What's your point?

3 The commonality of this belief is irrelevant.

4 I'm the only one being rational here. You have been irrational, petit, immature and hyper sensetive from the off.

[polisharabianlover26]

WHAT would you rather them do ... pull us out and have the war come over here !?!?! no i dont think so ~!!~!!!

[justseanmusic]

the governement will do whatever makes them the most money, thats the simple harsh reality.

[seneca67]

Earlier today the news reported multiple shooters. later, two shooters with one dead and another in custody. now its just one shooter? what the hell is going on?

[pixelelement]

@seneca67

Exactly I am thinking how could 1 man with two hand guns do all that.

The standard .45 holds(standard military pistol) 7 rounds per clip with 43 people killed/wounded that's 6 full clips with 2 hand guns. I find that hard to believe 1 man could do that on a military base before anyone could get to him. The other two must have been part of this.

[webslinger67]

Proof positive.... if the muslim world cant help themselves to gain the respect of the world, then we need to just pull out and let them all fight amongst eachother.

HASAD IS NOT DEAD!!!!! OMFG