nice video! Just to ask, were you mapping out the blindspot with the red hat pin? And is there really any difference between using white neurotip to map the fields and using your 'wagging' finger?
1. Yes. The red hat pin is looking for an enlarged blind spot. You might get that with optic neuritis for example. Or a high myope with a REALLY large amount of peripapillary atrophy.
2. A waggling finger is only a rough and ready way to map out fields (eg. for a busy A&E doctor etc). For MRCOphth and other membership examinations, it would best to be armed with a formal white and red hat pin.
Ask your friendly neighbourhood neurologist to demonstrate this.
8. Amsler grid.
Distortion would have been picked up on history. And a dilated fundal exam would have picked up macular pathology.
9. Paracentral scotomas. Can be picked up with white/red hat pins if you just logically extend the above techniques. You would have followed things up with a Humphrey 24:2 visual field anyway. Or 30:2 if you are feeling keen.
3. Rough kinetic screening with fingers. Could continue to midline if you were hunting for central/paracentral scotomas etc.
4. Kinetic screening with white hat pin. As above. Slightly finer.
5. Kinetic screening with red-hat pin. Check theoretical rough area of cone/macular function. And possibility of macular sparing theoretically in homonoymous hemianopias.
6. Blind spot mapping. With red hat pin. To look for enlarged blind spot (eg. optic neuritis).
For the record. Unfortunately I didn't quite have enough time to put in full explanations for everything I'm doing here. But it's a mixed-bag of screening techniques I'm demonstrating. Feel free to chop & change to create your own routine.
Techniques shown are:
1. Initial screening. For obvious homonymous hemianopia.
2. Static screening. Check visual acuity is at least counting fingers. And hunt for obvious quadrantanopias (eg. early pituitary lesions, pies in the sky/floor etc).
A bit confusing...
Allibaby78 3 months ago
"fantastic"
MPH272 4 months ago
@secretgeekyaccount Most commonly: Neurosurgeons, Neurologists, Neuro-ophthalmologists, and us Ophthalmologists.
trin0345 6 months ago
nice vid
mybabyandme08 7 months ago
there are some books state that the examiner must cover his eye opposite to patient closed eye?idonot know why we do this ?what for?
a7medmohamedbadawy89 9 months ago
@a7medmohamedbadawy89 You have 2 options:
1. Occlude your non-testing eye with your hand (as you describe).
2. Occlude your non-testing eye by closing your own eye with your own orbicularis muscle.
Either is fine. The reason is to test your monocular field against your patient's monocular field.
trin0345 6 months ago
@trin0345 hhhhhhhhhhh ithought u did it wrongly
in any event, great thanks dr
a7medmohamedbadawy89 6 months ago
FAN TAS TIC
cariad81 11 months ago
Lovely little nod at the end. Thanks, good video.
Verghinho 1 year ago
wtf
hush2088 1 year ago
Fantastic!
stugallimore 1 year ago
asomw
jeopardy59 1 year ago
Hi, What are you testing when you ask the patient when the Red hat pin is bright red?
hehmonkey 1 year ago
Macula function. Perception of the "red colour" of the red hat pin para-centrally is dependent on cones.
Whilst perception of the white hat pin in the extreme periphery is dependent on rods.
trin0345 1 year ago
"looking at me, How many hands do you see?" "2" How many hands do you have?!?1 ahah, that made me laugh.
Excellent though.
SuperMonkeyboy91 1 year ago
It's a basic screen for a homonymous hemianopia.
trin0345 1 year ago
Comment removed
3711mm 1 year ago
Comment removed
3711mm 1 year ago
fantastic
CasterTroy2 1 year ago
"FANTASTIC!"
lebleualto 1 year ago
Comment removed
lebleualto 1 year ago
Comment removed
lebleualto 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fantastic!
thegoldeye 1 year ago
nice video! Just to ask, were you mapping out the blindspot with the red hat pin? And is there really any difference between using white neurotip to map the fields and using your 'wagging' finger?
sliceadice 1 year ago
1. Yes. The red hat pin is looking for an enlarged blind spot. You might get that with optic neuritis for example. Or a high myope with a REALLY large amount of peripapillary atrophy.
2. A waggling finger is only a rough and ready way to map out fields (eg. for a busy A&E doctor etc). For MRCOphth and other membership examinations, it would best to be armed with a formal white and red hat pin.
trin0345 1 year ago
@trin0345 cheers, I can do this exam well now thanks to your video
sliceadice 1 year ago
@sliceadice
No problem. Glad to be of help.
trin0345 1 year ago
this was helpful :)
Moonlovefairy 1 year ago
Very helpful, have not seen that performed before!
angelivia2 2 years ago
Thank you!
trin0345 2 years ago
very helpful, but I have a question. Why were u testing the vision in the four quadrants?
sara0med 2 years ago
To look for the major neurological field defects (eg. quadrantanopias; hemianopias)
For example:
- bitemporal = pituitary
- "pie in the sky"; homonymous superior quadrantanopia = contralateral temporal lobe defect.
- "pie on the floor"; homonymous inferior quadrantanopia = contralateral parietal lobe defect.
hope that helps!
trin0345 2 years ago
Brilliant, really helpful and not a lot of these on the net. Cheers!
Shiney2808 2 years ago
fantastic
magiccatalyst 2 years ago
Fantastic!
kamikaz67 2 years ago 16
What cranial nerve is this testing?
cranbrook 3 years ago
Visual fields.
Thus part of 2nd cranial nerve (optic nerve).
trin0345 3 years ago
Ah, I see. Thanks dude.
Oh, is it also testing abducens and occulomotor nerves? Or are they tested separately?
cranbrook 3 years ago
No. 3rd and 6th do eye movements.
So that's a seperate test.
You can do either an H shape. Or an X/union jack shape for eye movements. Ask your friendly neighbourhood medic/ophthalmologist to show you that.
trin0345 3 years ago
I am the friendly medic next door...got a neuro exam in a few days and was a little confused!
Thanks for the help dude.
cranbrook 3 years ago
Techniques NOT shown:
7. Neglect.
Ask your friendly neighbourhood neurologist to demonstrate this.
8. Amsler grid.
Distortion would have been picked up on history. And a dilated fundal exam would have picked up macular pathology.
9. Paracentral scotomas. Can be picked up with white/red hat pins if you just logically extend the above techniques. You would have followed things up with a Humphrey 24:2 visual field anyway. Or 30:2 if you are feeling keen.
trin0345 3 years ago
3. Rough kinetic screening with fingers. Could continue to midline if you were hunting for central/paracentral scotomas etc.
4. Kinetic screening with white hat pin. As above. Slightly finer.
5. Kinetic screening with red-hat pin. Check theoretical rough area of cone/macular function. And possibility of macular sparing theoretically in homonoymous hemianopias.
6. Blind spot mapping. With red hat pin. To look for enlarged blind spot (eg. optic neuritis).
trin0345 3 years ago
Dear all,
For the record. Unfortunately I didn't quite have enough time to put in full explanations for everything I'm doing here. But it's a mixed-bag of screening techniques I'm demonstrating. Feel free to chop & change to create your own routine.
Techniques shown are:
1. Initial screening. For obvious homonymous hemianopia.
2. Static screening. Check visual acuity is at least counting fingers. And hunt for obvious quadrantanopias (eg. early pituitary lesions, pies in the sky/floor etc).
trin0345 3 years ago