Of the 19 guys one was dead and somehow managed resurrected himself to board the plans, and several are still alive today that must have somehow survived the impact and then managed to walk out of the buildings and go home.
This reporter is trying to make the news not report it. Science is the greatest way to proove something and it has shown time and time again we humans don't always see things correctly.
Why don't the respectable reporter ask the scientist about his science instead of asking him about what other people said or believed or immagined,...such a great reporting
Can the repoprter apply his logic in defending the allegations to the opposite theory ...he would have no reason to watch himself on a mirror and not spit
of cours is he has a bit of self respect or dignity
Man the ¨interviewer¨ is more like a interrogator, he should feel at home at Abu Griab or S 21. funny that the BBC made an excellent documentary back in april 2001 right before 911 about the attack on Pearl Harbor called : Sacrificed at Pearl Harbor. a must see. you can download it off the web. what a shame really. the BBC is now the Bullshit Broadcast Company.
@ho2cultcha I think he was deliberately being confrontational in attempting to undermine Dr Harrit's evidence and credibility, Michael Rudin is more a light of a Minorah rather than a candelabra
Mossad was all over 911 a fact!
lushfauna 1 month ago
Of the 19 guys one was dead and somehow managed resurrected himself to board the plans, and several are still alive today that must have somehow survived the impact and then managed to walk out of the buildings and go home.
h2opower 1 month ago
This reporter is trying to make the news not report it. Science is the greatest way to proove something and it has shown time and time again we humans don't always see things correctly.
h2opower 1 month ago
LOL!
Who ya gonna believe? Sir Isaac Newton or NIST?
NeoCynic1 1 month ago 2
Why don't the respectable reporter ask the scientist about his science instead of asking him about what other people said or believed or immagined,...such a great reporting
Tanblondalex 1 month ago
Can the repoprter apply his logic in defending the allegations to the opposite theory ...he would have no reason to watch himself on a mirror and not spit
of cours is he has a bit of self respect or dignity
Tanblondalex 1 month ago
The reporter is so, but so "objective" he can work as an atterny to defend the 9/11 theory
I wonder if he works for Silverstein directly
Tanblondalex 1 month ago
I couldn't have stood 2 hours with this idiot. I would have walked out on the interview.
HereticNews 1 month ago
Imagine having to put up with this idiot for two hours. I would have walked out on the interview.
HereticNews 1 month ago
Man the ¨interviewer¨ is more like a interrogator, he should feel at home at Abu Griab or S 21. funny that the BBC made an excellent documentary back in april 2001 right before 911 about the attack on Pearl Harbor called : Sacrificed at Pearl Harbor. a must see. you can download it off the web. what a shame really. the BBC is now the Bullshit Broadcast Company.
mac163 1 month ago
Niels Harrit wiped the floor with this so called bbc journalist. This is what passes for journalism these days. Fucking humans.
Seigu007 1 month ago
interviewer is not the brightest bulb in the candelabra, by a long shot.
ho2cultcha 1 month ago
@ho2cultcha I think he was deliberately being confrontational in attempting to undermine Dr Harrit's evidence and credibility, Michael Rudin is more a light of a Minorah rather than a candelabra
HISTROIKA 1 month ago