This video sums up the contrasting eras: The 1960's sleek E-Body Cuda design classic vs. the clumsy, lumpy looking 'Charger' -designed by corporate metrosexuals.
looks like both cars are stock, not really set up for the drags, so the times are slower than a track mostly or only car, the challenger spins badly or would no doubt be mid thirteens with a 4k launch that would stick, and the 5.7 turns an average time for a stock engine and dont know the altitude, the challenger was moving on the big end!!!!!
30 YEARS AND THIS IS WHAT U CALL AN IMPROVEMENT IF U GAVE THE GERMANS OR JAPANESE THEY WOULD MAKE A FUCKIN FLYING BENZ OR NISSAN BUT AMERICANS GET 30 YEARS TO IMPROVE BUT INSTEAD THEY GO BACKWARDS
If you want information, the Cuda has a 340 with + - 450 hp, a 6-speed Viper tranny and Charger stock tranny, k / n intake, slp headers and exhaust and Diablo Sport programmer.
I would be ashamed to even post a video of a car pulling 14.00 with a big block on the web like that. I don't run a civic, but I run a 11.42 car (with a bad tranny) I just though that Hemi Cuda's had more guts than that.
@pfk182 yeah I'd be ashamed to have a 'cuda that is that slow AND still take it to the track. Come on spend a little more time in the garage than you do on the strip
Very good, high quality drag video. I bet that dude in the Charger was like "F*** yeah I'm beating this guy!" Then the 'Cuda starts passing him and he's all "well S***"
@BMV4life420 Not in this state. There are plenty of 8 second civics out there. Whether or not you like them doesn't mean they are automatically slow, or stupid or anything else. Like you I enjoy muscle cars more than anything else, but that doesn't mean everyone agrees and that also doesn't make this 'Cudas run any less pathetic. Anything with a Hemi in it that still does 14.05 is shameful. I've seen 318's do better.
No problem mate. I might go back to Sanair tomorow night maybe there will be more muscle cars (too much civic). Ill upload some more if i have more good videos. Thx for the comment ! :D
@DestroyeR7904 that wasant a hemi either a 340 or 440 and the suspension obviously looked stock, on the cuda. also not to mention the plastic piece of shit has a bunch of computers, and traction control yet still looses... hmm i find it hilarious that 40+ years and we still haven't improved much.
@Dimmuborgir6969 Probably, they should of both run better IMO. I've run just as fast as the cuda in my 4dr 68 chevelle with a 396. So either that is not a 426 hemi or he got a really bad run.
The green car lose !
MrAngry911 3 weeks ago
wud it have been crazy if the dad ownd the charger and the son ownd the cuda? o.O
klridener 4 months ago
that guy in the charger cant drive :/ 15.4??? thats unheard of!
TheNXGvideos 5 months ago
Comment removed
wiih8ps3 5 months ago
As they say Go catch a cuda , if you can !
cudaneil1 6 months ago
How did that new Charger only muster a 15+ second 1/4 mile? They run 13's stock. And you can't blame shifting, they're autos.
ripptyde27 6 months ago
@ripptyde27
Its the driver mod. Too much preload and the computer pulls timing, no preload and yeah, launching a 4000lb car without preloading....youch.
DavitzHelsing 4 months ago
AWESOME QUALITY
STGPup 6 months ago
This video sums up the contrasting eras: The 1960's sleek E-Body Cuda design classic vs. the clumsy, lumpy looking 'Charger' -designed by corporate metrosexuals.
guthywoodry 7 months ago
looks like both cars are stock, not really set up for the drags, so the times are slower than a track mostly or only car, the challenger spins badly or would no doubt be mid thirteens with a 4k launch that would stick, and the 5.7 turns an average time for a stock engine and dont know the altitude, the challenger was moving on the big end!!!!!
curtknows101 7 months ago
@curtknows101 what challenger?lol
SpankDeath 6 months ago
@SpankDeath Yea you got me on that one lol, my buddy has a challenger the same color so it thru me off, Hemi Cuda, my bad!!!!! :-D
curtknows101 6 months ago
@fuglymen1423 id go for the older one. as much as i like the newer charger they really dont make them like they used to
PD19954 7 months ago
The new Chargers are pieces of shit.
OldboySaint 7 months ago
thats why ppl reay need to learn that new cars are crap now
BGKO1992 9 months ago
Charger so slow? :D
Awesome Cuda power....
Sssagaman 9 months ago
that charger had way to much bulk . . . put a 69 dodge charger vs a plymoth hemi cuda and settle the score either way im a happy camper
kingbeefy69 9 months ago
hell yea man
ITRIEDEL 9 months ago
I love seeing the good old cars still doing great. But of course this cuda never was racing against an actual dodge charger...
BikerRussell 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
my heart belongs to that cuda at first ur like this chargers goona cream him but once u hear the sound of that car literaly shit
wegetstoopidincars 9 months ago
my heart belongs to that cuda at first ur like this chargers goona cream him but once u hear the sound of that car literaly shit
wegetstoopidincars 9 months ago
damm hemi cuda all the way
EseS1xx3r 9 months ago
Aaaand... it's gone.
UndyingSimmons 10 months ago
The green car won.
abitibiqc 10 months ago 22
15.4 seems kinda slow for a hemi charger
GuitarnScythes 10 months ago
@GuitarnScythes both cars seemed slo n they both had passengers so that would slo em down a bit..idk
johnpagecontraband 10 months ago
30 YEARS AND THIS IS WHAT U CALL AN IMPROVEMENT IF U GAVE THE GERMANS OR JAPANESE THEY WOULD MAKE A FUCKIN FLYING BENZ OR NISSAN BUT AMERICANS GET 30 YEARS TO IMPROVE BUT INSTEAD THEY GO BACKWARDS
uberjorge5737 10 months ago
@uberjorge5737 we aint allowed 2 build "cool" shit no more..crazy laws, now everything has gota b designed 4saftey
johnpagecontraband 10 months ago 3
old beats new, yet again!
andrew130794 11 months ago
funny) very funny) i like these cars)
ALFAzairin 1 year ago
@ALFAzairin What's funny?
spidereon2 11 months ago
eated
medjaiii 1 year ago
the new Dodge Charger is not like the 1970 Dodge Charger in any way
i dont it seems like the same level as some japaneas cars like toyota avalon and honda accord
i think some people ill agree with me
PEPE20barca 1 year ago
both slower than stock ... umm bad drivers? ha
moparsarebeast 1 year ago
this is the first pass of the evening ... the cuda do 12.90 one hour later
TheCrazyCharger 1 year ago
If you want information, the Cuda has a 340 with + - 450 hp, a 6-speed Viper tranny and Charger stock tranny, k / n intake, slp headers and exhaust and Diablo Sport programmer.
TheCrazyCharger 1 year ago
@TheCrazyCharger Then how in the hell does it only do mid 14's?
MakeGlovesNotWars 1 year ago
@TheCrazyCharger Then it's not a hemi 'cuda like the title says
farmerallis 1 year ago
I would be ashamed to even post a video of a car pulling 14.00 with a big block on the web like that. I don't run a civic, but I run a 11.42 car (with a bad tranny) I just though that Hemi Cuda's had more guts than that.
pfk182 1 year ago
@pfk182 yeah I'd be ashamed to have a 'cuda that is that slow AND still take it to the track. Come on spend a little more time in the garage than you do on the strip
espChris93 1 year ago
Very good, high quality drag video. I bet that dude in the Charger was like "F*** yeah I'm beating this guy!" Then the 'Cuda starts passing him and he's all "well S***"
Amras0407 1 year ago
FREAKIN BEAUTY CARSS!!
joey187 1 year ago
Man that cuda just left him in 2nd
chill540 1 year ago
72 would of gotten better eta with some fatties 14:05. Hole shot time could of been better though.
sprydo7 1 year ago
@sprydo7 your a fuckin tard 72 was the downfall of America
jeremiahskates 10 months ago
Hemi Cuda's are freaking slow. Chargers are worse.
Fugly, sell you civic and ask your dad to buy you one.
pfk182 1 year ago
@pfk182 that hemi cuda will rip yer car to shreds kid
BMV4life420 1 year ago
@BMV4life420 Not in this state. There are plenty of 8 second civics out there. Whether or not you like them doesn't mean they are automatically slow, or stupid or anything else. Like you I enjoy muscle cars more than anything else, but that doesn't mean everyone agrees and that also doesn't make this 'Cudas run any less pathetic. Anything with a Hemi in it that still does 14.05 is shameful. I've seen 318's do better.
espChris93 1 year ago
@pfk182 u r the most retarded kid i have came across......ur p.o.s civic 4 cylinder would die
LenoirPanther11 1 year ago
thats not even a srt8 thats a daytona charger
racingchamp101 1 year ago
Nice !
Viperkiller97 1 year ago
You can't have old vs new because the new muscule cars are crap comparid to the old muscule cars
jouneytotheoutdoors 1 year ago
Well said !
TheGamer85Play 2 years ago
Hemi cuda's are awesome
psychoclown420 2 years ago
Damn Right!
mrstiches15 2 years ago
I enjoy watching a high quality video of a HEMI CUDA ® beating a brand new 5.7 HEMI CHARGER
thanks for uploading this vid ;)
HEMIH3AD 2 years ago 9
No problem mate. I might go back to Sanair tomorow night maybe there will be more muscle cars (too much civic). Ill upload some more if i have more good videos. Thx for the comment ! :D
TheGamer85Play 2 years ago
@HEMIH3AD
Because 5.7 Hemi is nothing to a 7.0 Street Hemi,not mentioning the aluminum Race Hemi.
DestroyeR7904 11 months ago
@DestroyeR7904 that wasant a hemi either a 340 or 440 and the suspension obviously looked stock, on the cuda. also not to mention the plastic piece of shit has a bunch of computers, and traction control yet still looses... hmm i find it hilarious that 40+ years and we still haven't improved much.
jeremiahskates 10 months ago
@HEMIH3AD displacement on cuda is what 7.0? ;p
Dimmuborgir6969 4 months ago
@Dimmuborgir6969 Probably, they should of both run better IMO. I've run just as fast as the cuda in my 4dr 68 chevelle with a 396. So either that is not a 426 hemi or he got a really bad run.
CyborgbobaFett 2 months ago