Can christian accept the truth? It's your religion, study it by yourself. Moeslem help cristian to study the bible. What if moeslem did not ask about the bible? would christian dig the true of the bible? or just believe in faith?
Why are there so few views for this video section of the debate compared to the parts before and after it, did you recently reupload with a change to the video? Was there something taken out at 22:16 or so, because it looks like there's a jump in Shabir's rebuttal at that time? I really enjoy Shabir and Bill in this debate, both are top notch in their debates and very respectful of one another.
this retard Craig does not understand the meaning of crucified. he thinks who ever put on cross is crucified, regardless of if that person died on cross or not, so every Easter day Christines put a show for Jesus crucifixion n ppl who participate in it after the show overs come down n walk home smoking cigarettes, so according to him they had crucified n raisin from dead LMAO.... what an IDIOT!
Dr. Craig had an excellent point on the crucifixion in the quran , shabir theory is highly improbable , the quran said clearly '' they did not kill him , nor crucify him ''
but over all shabir did Good , except on that point
@JayEss2k Jesus' resurrected appearances to so-called eyewitnesses included Paul or Saul, a Jew scholar in Greek mytholgy who never saw nor met with Jesus in person BUT wrote most of the New Testament, ironically calling the resurrection as his gospel in 2 Timothy 2:8 to creating Pauline Christianity instead of the teaching of Jesus' prophethood.
TEN COMMANDMENTS: 1. You shall have no other gods before me. 2. You shall not make for yourselves an idol. 3. You shall not misuse the name of the Lord your God. 4. Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy. 5. Honor your father and your mother. 6. You shall not murder. 7. You shall not commit adultery. 8. You shall not steal. 9. You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor. 10. You shall not covet.
lol the christian scholar had nothing else to say .. he kept repeating himself over and over again ..wich shows he was clueless lol ..shabir ally wins !!
@b2bb55: You weren't watching the same debate as I was then objectively. Shabir Ally did not retort any of the historical claims that were made by Dr Craig, as well as the Theological objections. Shabir Ally is a smart man, but his Theology is flawed in respect to history.
@dimic nope its u my friend who werent watching objectively ,the so called "Historical Claims" by Dr.Craig are ALL from the Bible this is the only historical evidence u have and Mr.Shabir showed you that there was a development in ur bible threw time ,it has gone threw many editions alot of things were added to it ,and what ur doing is resorting to it as a historical fact ? the earliest copy u have of the bible is a copy of a copy of a copy..) each copy has its own mistakes and u call it a fact?
Why are there so few views for this video section of the debate compared to the parts before and after it, did you recently reupload with a change to the video? Was there something taken out at 22:16 or so, because it looks like there's a jump in Shabir's rebuttal at that time? I really enjoy Shabir and Bill in this debate, both are top notch in their debates and very respectful of one another.
Jesus wins!
ChristianRapMusic 7 months ago
Can christian accept the truth? It's your religion, study it by yourself. Moeslem help cristian to study the bible. What if moeslem did not ask about the bible? would christian dig the true of the bible? or just believe in faith?
DannyTheSeeker 9 months ago
@DannyTheSeeker you can't even spell your own religion... Moeslem?
ChristianRapMusic 7 months ago
@DannyTheSeeker You single out people of your religion who compels christians to study the bible?
wonderwall62 6 months ago
Why are there so few views for this video section of the debate compared to the parts before and after it, did you recently reupload with a change to the video? Was there something taken out at 22:16 or so, because it looks like there's a jump in Shabir's rebuttal at that time? I really enjoy Shabir and Bill in this debate, both are top notch in their debates and very respectful of one another.
kunzx037 1 year ago
this retard Craig does not understand the meaning of crucified. he thinks who ever put on cross is crucified, regardless of if that person died on cross or not, so every Easter day Christines put a show for Jesus crucifixion n ppl who participate in it after the show overs come down n walk home smoking cigarettes, so according to him they had crucified n raisin from dead LMAO.... what an IDIOT!
halakukhan 1 year ago
Dr. Craig had an excellent point on the crucifixion in the quran , shabir theory is highly improbable , the quran said clearly '' they did not kill him , nor crucify him ''
but over all shabir did Good , except on that point
ZeUndertaker15 1 year ago
Dr. William Lane Craig is simply stating the Facts
JayEss2k 1 year ago 2
@JayEss2k Jesus' resurrected appearances to so-called eyewitnesses included Paul or Saul, a Jew scholar in Greek mytholgy who never saw nor met with Jesus in person BUT wrote most of the New Testament, ironically calling the resurrection as his gospel in 2 Timothy 2:8 to creating Pauline Christianity instead of the teaching of Jesus' prophethood.
saidinmas 1 year ago
lilnewyork13 1 year ago 2
lol the christian scholar had nothing else to say .. he kept repeating himself over and over again ..wich shows he was clueless lol ..shabir ally wins !!
b2bb55 1 year ago
@b2bb55: You weren't watching the same debate as I was then objectively. Shabir Ally did not retort any of the historical claims that were made by Dr Craig, as well as the Theological objections. Shabir Ally is a smart man, but his Theology is flawed in respect to history.
dimic 1 year ago 2
@dimic nope its u my friend who werent watching objectively ,the so called "Historical Claims" by Dr.Craig are ALL from the Bible this is the only historical evidence u have and Mr.Shabir showed you that there was a development in ur bible threw time ,it has gone threw many editions alot of things were added to it ,and what ur doing is resorting to it as a historical fact ? the earliest copy u have of the bible is a copy of a copy of a copy..) each copy has its own mistakes and u call it a fact?
b2bb55 1 year ago
@dimic
WRONG. His theolgy is distorted due to his religion. He is a astute man non the less.
aaronstately 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why are there so few views for this video section of the debate compared to the parts before and after it, did you recently reupload with a change to the video? Was there something taken out at 22:16 or so, because it looks like there's a jump in Shabir's rebuttal at that time? I really enjoy Shabir and Bill in this debate, both are top notch in their debates and very respectful of one another.
kunzx037 1 year ago