Added: 3 years ago
From: LightEssence37
Views: 10,679
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (110)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Going to elsewhere's of thought, getting out the routine,out of the box , first in thought, then in reality, is the most amazing experience one can have. Yes we are addicted to our patterns because there is a chemical identity to each feeling, and our brains creates receptors for each emotions and they are going to need their fix everyday. Hence the repetition of our daily crap. Take your mind and think of something outrageous everyday, something crazy & look for a miracle, Amazing video.

  • this is total bullshit folks, don`t fall for any of it...observe those getting interviewed; they`re all barking mad gay lesbian brainwashed illuminatti puppets...balls to this shit

  • Pity does nothing for oneself nor for anyone else. Mother teresa was a poor excuse for a human being- all she could do was cry with others & feel sorry. no one who was poor did not stay poor because of her- all she did was waste her time, energy & resources. if she had been any bit rational, had even the slightest inkling for being truly selfish, she would have sought to open a good important buisiness, & maybe give a job to those who are worthy of a job.

  • u are either an irrational parasite or a rational, free & strong man

  • By taking from the strong, able, smart & brilliant, & GIVING (not even trading) to the undeserving poor, the unseen & the stupid, socialistic & altruistic systems promote mediocrity & punish the outstanding. this is why so many of the brilliant minds left communist russia or died

    Nothing ought be free except the air u breathe. But it is up to u whether u wish to breathe or not. it is up to u if u wish to work or not- no one can force u & u cant force anyone.

  • But altruists, collectivists & the like, all spout virtually the same bullshit nonsense, "the individual owes a non-existant obligation to the non-existant collective for a non-existant benefit of the non-existant whole"

    See why dictators just LOVE such naive stupid sheeple? those who hold such notions have forfeited their rights since a collective does not have any rights

  • It is the individual who lives- it is the individual who dies. it is the individual who eats, who sleeps, who works, & who breathes. it is the individual who holds individual rights & it is the responsibility of the individual to maintain those rights else he lose it- remember happiness is only a right, not a guarantee

  • There are so many countless holes in socialistic agendas. especially those which utilize brute force- which the govt essentially is. The govt operates at the barrel of a gun. And is it ever right to take from john to give to joe- at the barrel of a gun? no

    socialists, altruists & collectivists dont care for rights- they cant care since rights do not exist in a collective. A collective does not breathe, a collective does not think, does not eat, does not sleep- it neither lives nor dies

  • so when u just randomly hand out EVERYONE's money, as in social security, most people on the receiving end hold no relation to those on the giving end. i mean who really does? unless u love everybody & everybody loves u, such an act is wrong to its core. And loving everybody is a truly meaningless statement as rand has argued. Its only economically logical since theres too many people, love is scarce(& hence valuble) & resources & time are too few and very limited.

  • Remember, it is essentially evil to trade a higher value/virtue for a lesser one. ayn rand had also argued this point- like i said, go read her works

    Hence u dont arbitrarily give presents or receive presents from random people. if u dont value the other person's virtues or achievements, u ought neither give to nor recieve gifts from them- dont trade a higher value for garbage! u only give presents to those whom u value dearly- that is what makes gifts valuable & thats what makes love sacred

  • No guarantee is made on ur rights, not on ur life nor on ur property- it is up to u to guarantee them. "You have a right to happiness; it is up to you to chase after it"

    Somehow u think that happiness & love ought be guaranteed to everyone. But from whom does such happiness & love come from? It infringes on the REAL rights of others to love & seek happiness.

  • 'help the old'- well first off, any rational person does not just SACRIFICE himself, his belongings, time, energy, liberty & life for others- that is key. u do not give up a higher value for a lower one. If u did, ur not only foolish, but most likely u are short lived and without any freedom or rights at all. It should be noted that NONE of the rights are entitlements but rather they are only rights TO actions.

  • The supporters who pushed for such a scam used the exact rhetoric of an altruist society- out of pity, out of guilt, out of a "social obligation to others". hell, even the supposed "benefit" claimed by its supporters were irrational, not well thought out, & were obviously illegitimate to begin with.

  • It is probably the only consistent philosophy with individual freedom

    Altruism, collectivism & mysticism are incompatible with personal liberty, personal property & the lives of individuals. But altruism, collectivism & such are only the mere consequences of the irrational

    for example, Any human with a brain already knows social security to be a fraud- its one of the largest ponzi schemes ever made. hell most of the largest ponzi schemes are only made possible through govt's brute force

  • If the happiness of others were a primary virtue, then no SELVES would have any meaning of life- that means no one has any liberty, no personal property no personal life. And like they say, if u dont got ur personal life, u dont got a life at all- hahahhaa

    well just read ayn rand & dont jump on the wagon for altruism, collectivism or mysticism.

  • because i value ur virtues & achievements & u contribute to my happiness, i will then contribute to urs respectively. This is love broken down into its most basic sense- love can only be achieved by a standard or measure of value & virtue. The unworthy dont get any, and only the worthy may get some. But remember it is only secondary.

  • The rational man would only help himself; secondarily ONLY IF when able, he will help those whom he loves, and only love those whom he values. He only gives gifts to those he loves & accepts gifts from those he loves. To give a gift to some stranger is to throw away that gift & destroy the sanctity of love. Giving gifts is not an obligation, i have no obligation to give my wife or children a gift. Only when i feel like will i do so. love is a buisiness deal- a very selfish one- which is good

  • if u dont even want to resist, then dont resist & just die- how can u protect anyone unwilling to protect themselves? who would? that is just suicide, that is literally called throwing money down the drain

  • when u unwilling to protect urself, no duh- tyrants, who are irrational and not selfish by nature, will abuse u. They abuse precisely cuz u let them- this is the case 99% of the time. u forfeited some right to them for them to abuse-

    so when u talk about "pity for the jews", i ask u are they even worth pity? did they even have the measly inkling of a will to protect themselves? if so, where was the fight? wheres the resistance?

  • no one is entitled to any god damn thing. they must fight for it if they so want it. (topic of love & gifts are discussed by rand in her works- go read them- google is your friend)

    And really any entitlement system or "social obligation" as the altruists may call it- is really unfeasible as it is impossible to really sustain. again the argument continues in full detail in her works- so go read ayn rand if u want to see why

  • @swu880

    btw selfishness is never really evil. if u had read ayn rand works like i had linked & told u to read, u would know why selfishness is not evil. Real selfishness holds no real method for being evil- its the caring for one's self. Remember- it is the role of slaves & sacrificial animals to practice their "selfless servitude" for the benefit & happiness of others.

  • @swu880

    Thus should one choose to become a slave, firstly they are fools (then again most people are emotional fools), then as slaves they hold no rights. Slaves & sacrificial animals disregard themselves for whatever motive. And b/c they disregard themselves, they dont care about their rights, life or property- not caring means the same thing as losing. Thus if u dont care about ur rights to life, why the hell should u be surprised to die?

  • the real american heroes are howard roark & john galt- those who think otherwise really arent american one bit other than in name.

  • Ayn rand has commented quite explicitly on this & denounced the evil of altruism

  • Altruism seeks to denounce the individual, his rights & his liberty & property- not out of compassion but out of hatred. True hatred for the successful, the smart, the intelligent, the able

    Just cuz another has food & u are hungry, u are not entitled to that food in any way shape or form. Now should they either not care for their own property, rights & life then u may take that food since who will care for no one's food?

  • pity is overrated & evil. stop the pity & crying or fuckin die already. u want love, earn it. get a job instead of begging & crying. And if u want to help others, give them a job

  • When ur skills increase, so does your market value, as market value increase so does ur paycheck. And if u got a paycheck, u can spend it however u like, u can invest it or squander i dont give a fuck- its ur own money ur own life. i aint dictatin how other people should spend or waste their money. nor should anyone dictate to me how to spend mine

  • A job is worth a million times more than a fuckin loaf of bread- a job is self esteem, its self support, its self reliant, its self love & self respect. Forget a fuckin loaf of bread- if u got a job, really any job, u can eventually buy a bakery

  • all altruism does is turn all the people into either beggars or slaves- just look @ communist russia. hell who has helped more people? mother teresa or warren buffet? all mother teresa did was go on a pity streak. sure she "shared people's pain"- but what does "sharing pain & pity" do for humanity? what does making people into beggars do for anybody? Warren buffet at least got people some damn jobs!

  • Hell if u even speak english & can read the words, "selfless servitude", u will already see why its so evil- its anti-self. You yourself have made urself into a SLAVE, thrown away your own rights, liberty, property & sanctity of life. Selfless servitude is a slave's role. Sacrificing oneself for another's happiness is the sacrificial animal's role. And neither the sacrificial animal nor the slave have ever contributed anything meaningful to society-

  • Only those whom i deem worthy of love i will give them love- only those whose virtues & achievement of values i deem valuble will i be able to respect & love. That is what respect & love is- its SCARCE & SACRED. NO one is entitled to any love at all- face it. And loving another is not the highest virtue or purpose of life- nor is selfless servitude. Selfless servitude is the worst crime -its evil at its core.

  • He married a seamstress- an ugly horrible seamstress whom he didnt even "love". He married her not for his own sake, not for himself, but for her's. Guess what- she ended up killing herself- suicide. To love another whom deserve no love is to violate the sanctity, scarcity & virtue of love itself. yet love is of no virtue when it neglects the self.

    Hence why its so insulting to say, "i'll marry you not cuz i love u but for ur sake". That is degrading & insulting- u call that compassion?

  • Pity- there is no worse concept than pity & guilt. It is the very core of altruism that pity & guilt thrive- For there is nothing wrong with loving oneself. But to sacrifice oneself for the happiness of others more than oneself merely out of the whims of emotions like pity is IRRATIONAL & detrimental to one's own life, liberty & poverty. Take for example the russian author who tried to practice such "love". Having no standard of value or virtue by which to judge, he sought to love another

  • If u dont live ur own life, should u be surprised when u lose it? if u dont cherish & exercise ur own rights, should u be surprised when u can no longer practice them? What is yours is yours so long as u keep it yours- cherish it but moreover love yourself first or else lose it

  • You can only be responsible for yourself- the highest value is your own life. And your own happiness is your own highest virtue. I cant be responsible for urs. Whats urs is urs so long as u keep it urs. Whats mine is mine & i dont take what is not mine. If u urself do not guarantee ur own liberty, do not protect ur own property, do not live ur own life, do not think with your own mind, who the hell will? If u do not defend ur own property, should u be surprised when others take it?

  • -Bone Marrow (STEM CELLS), Spine, Ribs, Liver, Brain, are locations containing the highest amount of Cannabinoid receptors (CB1 & CB2)

    -What do Endocannabinoids Do?

    "Relax, eat, sleep, forget & protect"

    Dr. Di Marzo

    -Physiological Systems & Conditions Affected by Endocannabinoids

    Appetite/feeding, Blood pressure, Cerebral blood flow, Digestive system, Emesis & nausea, Immune system, Inflammation, Memory, Mood, Movement, Neuroprotection, Pain, Reproduction & Stress

    Dr. Mechoulam

  • hahaha i laughed so hard at the dysfunctional woman @ 1:30

  • how many of you folks that have commented on this particular episode, know ANYTHING AT ALL about heroin addiction???? She is corect in saying that we have opiates naturally produced in our bodies from before day one, and flooding the receptors does nothing but shut off our natural ability to produce natural opiates, as far as most of the comments i see here, you al no NOTHING ABOUT IT!!!!!

  • atheistic propaganda bullshit is the real name for this crap

  • @BlessedShreder911 Remember it was not too long ago people with "religious beliefs" were torturing and burning people alive and practicing genocide in the name of Yahweh or Jesus or Allah or whatever. If I have to decide between that sort of thinking and the New Age- I must respectfully choose the beliefs in this video, at least it is positive.

  • @BlessedShreder911 Atheism comes from the greec word atheos witch means, "without God" or "Godless". This film presents a new way to see the concept of God. It takes God out from the skies and puts God "inside you and me". So this is not Godless. It gives YOU responsibilities instead of a condemning God witch is seperated from you. So if YOU condemn, you are actualy condemning YOURSELF. This makes you frustraded cause you are not used to this perspective therefore your aggressive comment.

  • @fremmed1 yeah i am aggressive to this new age crap cuz i know whre it will lead us.evolution is impossible scientificaly,what is the other option -we were created not by alien but by God/

  • @BlessedShreder911 This is not new age or old age for that matter. Wherever it will leads us is up to you and me. So where do you lead yourself? You got free will don`t you? If we are created by God, then what is God? And is God "possible" scientificly? And what about love?

  • @fremmed1 this is absolutely pseudo scientific new age junk,you have free will,God is the reason why we have science ,causality,so the first casue of love must be loving,first cause of care must be caring,first cause of limitate space must be spaceles,first cause of spirituality must be spirit(non material thus can't be judged by your human standards to wheter he exist or not) thus you have atributes Of God.

  • @BlessedShreder911 first cause of energy must be powerful,and so on...

    sicence points to supernatural origin of the universe and the earth about 6 to 10 thousand years ago..we have irrefutable evidence of the young earth(c14 in diamonds ,c14 in coal,pelochroic halos,helium difusion rate and so on) thus we are left with supernatural origin of plants and animals thus evolution is impossible (it's impossble anyway) and you are left with supernatural personal cause of this vast uvinderse.your choice

  • @BlessedShreder911 And i say because i have gathered experience and transfered it into visdom: When everything comes down to de deepest core there`s only two choises. The choises witch comes from either love or fear. The important question is: What do YOU choose to be in relation to the things you observe.

    This makes you into an active observator instead of a passive. It`s passive to think God is "up in the sky" taking care of you by condemn you if you do or do not follow spesific rules.

  • @BlessedShreder911 It`s one oppinion against another! If there is a condemning God witch creates everything it do not leave you witch to much choise does it? We should all be humble enough to admit that we can believe what we want, but that do not mean your choise defines the reason why you got the right to judge other persons outlooks by calling it bullshit, crap etc.

    That is not very tolerant. The "meaning" of life is to experience and to live in wisdom cause of it. So why judge anyone?

  • @fremmed1 1 John 4:7,8

    Dear friends, let us love one another, for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God. Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love.

  • @BlessedShreder911 Love is impossible to localise. So is God. In witch form would God reveal the true shape? How do you measure your feelings, your soul?

    Traditional science can never conclude of what Love/God "is" an neither can traditional religion. We can choose a new realm witch do not seperate, judge or use clockwork agendas.

    God is our souls expressing itself through us, as us.

    You don`t need to agree. And you dont need to call this shit. This is a choise.

    I love you anyway:)

  • @fremmed1 God is impossible to localise in the universe beacaue he is creator of it and it's not bound by laws of the universe he is above and beyond.but you see 2000 years ago God was impossible to localise,he became a man and died for our sins,that is God of Christianity you want to reject this and overwhelming scientfiic evidence and believe in this psedoscientific garbage,,and i used stronger leanguage becasue thats a big part of the end time deception next they will tell you that et is god

  • @BlessedShreder911 I don`t reject God. I reject the condemning God. Instead of describe this film as garbage, i choose to see the potential information in everything i observe and then i "digest" the information through my own intelect. I feed my intelect to make it stronger and this will make me less arrogant. The main message in this film is: We are all ONE and you are the "God" in the making. This is not scary or bullshit before someone accept it this way refering to fundamental rules.

  • @BlessedShreder911 And God is impossible to localise cause God "is" the universe? Well, you can localise the universe... What about fossils witch is older than 2000 years. You believe the scientists are confused? What about the pyramids and the mummys inside of them. This is humans living in an sophisticated community thousands of years before Jesus happened.

    Jesus tried to tell us about unity, not seperatism. You know that dont you?

  • @fremmed1 i have no idea what are you talking about we seting up a strawman here.who said god is the universe well i assume you think so.but i did not say such thing.could you be more clear?

  • @BlessedShreder911 You wrote: God is impossible to localise cause he ("he" sounds like an describing of a human bein) did create it. God is abowe laws of the universe. If God created the universe and is abowe the "laws of it" and cause of that impossible to localise, then why are we saying God is up in the skies and not paret of you and me? Jesus quoted: The kingdom of God is everywhere.

    Why do you think he said that if Jesus where the localised version of God, God in human form?

  • Absolutely amazing.

  • I love you!

  • The Secret..

  • I'd say "yes and no" or that "The Secret is 100% right 50% of the way".

    The notion that we ourselves create our own reality, I think, is an acceptable one. That's where Rhondy Byrne is right. However, she never takes into account that the outside world has an effect on us. That it goes both ways. Sometimes the world can be a crushing place. Imagine you're a conzentration camp victim. How could anyone in their right minds suggest this was freely created?!

  • The absurdity of that notion is only matched by its ruthfulness. The conzentration camp victim just oughtta think differently?! Be appreciative?! Come on!!!

    Our interplay with our surroundings AND our interplay with our own consciousness and their mutual interplay is the only constant factor. Change. Both from within and without.

    According to Rhondy Byrne, as I read her, we should not care the least about conzentration camp victims since this would only reaffirm their "victim convictions".

  • I think we should care for those people! Give them unconditional love. Help them.

    That will assume that we accept the notion that we can help others. And that others may help us. Which, by the way, I think that sounds pretty obvious!

    But it means that when we think of ourselves we also have to think about everyone else. We are all one.

    And The Secret to my mind never teaches that. Just egocentricity and the materialist world view.

  • @skeletonmansion

    well you must admit that half the so called 'concentration camp victims' were self afflicted. its sad but true in the most objective analytical sense.

    The nazis did not just sieze control of parliament over night & then start torturin people the next day through brute force. It was all if not mostly through voluntary stupidity- idiots would just sign away their rights through legislation

  • @swu880

    First u must understand- the power was not really "taken away" but rather it was "given away". I suggest u first watch the film "Innocents Betrayed" which describes my next point fairly clearly. When nazi germany instituted 'gun control' laws on the jews & citizens, no one really questioned the laws or actions of the officials. And they like all silently obeyed & HANDED OVER THEIR ARMS. That in itself is the giving away of power

  • @swu880

    Bullies, tyrants & criminals do not prey on people because they are strong, intelligent & well armed. they prey on those that are weak, stupid, ignorant & foolish. Wolves love to attack sheep. Thus when the jews totally forfeited their Strength of Arms, they in essence forfeited their lives. And when the night of glass- or krystalnacht came, they did virtually nothing other than quiver in fear. There was no riot, no resistance as all the jewish shops were broken & jews were humiliated

  • @swu880

    There was NO resistance when they were segregated. There was NO resistance when they were rounded up & herded into trains. And then u want to say they were merely victims? no! they victimized themselves.

    it is one thing to want to do something but not be able to. And it is a whole nother to choose not to do anything at all. When the jews chose to forfeit their arms they may as well have painted a large target on themselves that said "RAPE ME"

  • @swu880

    I pity only those who are involuntarily harmed by tyrants & criminals after having fought the fight. I feel no pity for those who foolishly willingly hand themselves over to tyrants & criminals without even fighting a fight. Instead i will just sit back, have a cup of coffee & enjoy the site as they get their asses raped

  • @swu880

    It is one thing to be weak. It is another to choose to be weak

  • @swu880 shut the fuck up prick.

  • @swu880 The apprentice search for his master. He had nothing to drink on the long journey. Then he saw this little old man infront of him. He handed him a cup of water and he drank it all. He asks: "Have you seen my master, he supposed to be a great warrior". The little old man looked at him and said: "War do not make anyone great". Then he raised his arm an showed the scar from the battle.... "Are you my master", he asked. "Well, i just knew you where thirsty", the little old man answered.

  • @swu880 If someone wears a t-shirt with the letter: "RAPE ME" do not mean that i need to create inside my mind a reason to DO IT cause i know better than exploite someone elses lack of defence.

    The only true reason why anyone could harm another is cause you seperate yourself from the "victim". If you saw yourself in another you would not harm that person cause if you did you would also harm yourself. But if you do not care about yourself, well then you would probably not develop compassion.

  • @fremmed1

    i suggest u first study a bit of objectivism & rationality. It is pointless to expect the irrational tyrants to be any bit rational. And it is even more silly to throw away one's own rationality for the sake of another. If someone wants to not train themselves physically, mentally,etc, then they themselves face the consequences of not training themselves- they choose to be weak

    in a free society- u reap what u sow & u get nothing more nothing less

  • @swu880

    If they choose to defend themselves then they can defend themselves. I dont infringe on others' rights & in reverse, others can not infringe on my rights else i will violently resist such a violation.

  • @swu880

    I do not entitle others to one second of my time or one ounce of my energy. Nor do i necessarily entitle myself to one second of other's time or one ounce of their energy. i am a trader- i trade my goods, services & values for other's goods, services & values that i deem valuable

  • @swu880

    hence no man should expect another man to protect or feed him- he must do so himself. And no man can expect to just be given anything- he must earn it himself. Nothing is free - neither in love nor in life

  • @swu880 Objectivism do not describe all human qualities. It only define us in a clockwork way. The subjectical side defines different versions of personality. You got one don`t you. What about a mind. You got one don`t you? You use your mind when you observe the world and others who live in it.

    Would you harm another person if it gave you sexual or economical credit? I`m curios if you know the wideness of compassion. Is compassion a weakness to you? You seem a bit gnostic, you know...

  • @swu880 Where the jews weak and the Nazis the strong one? Is that what YOU mean? I want to know what YOU mean. Does resistance equal strenght? In physical terms, basicaly, yes. In human terms, well if we are just a carbon unite witch is here to be exploited or to exploite then maybe that attitude is the main reason why we suffer.

    There are no "right" and "wrong" cause judgementalism do not define human greatness.

    But: What do YOU choose to be in relation to what YOU observe?

  • Comment removed

  • @swu880

    There is nothing radical about objectivism- its more like "Personal responsibility = freedomism"

  • @swu880 You wrote about Nazis vs Jews. Are tyrants strong cause they exploite someones lack of resistance? What about their responsibilitie then? Are you only responsible for your own life? Doe`s it mean that you have no reason to feel compassion? Freedom = responsibility through an egosentric outlook and through the "united" way will create two wery different results. You got the freedom to do what you want. But would you harm one who did not resist if it gave you sexual or economical credit?

  • @fremmed1

    i never said tyrants are strong- but the jews definitely were not strong at all- they made themselves weak. hell they fuckin DISARMED THEMSELVES. if ur throwing away ur guns & handin them over to ur tyrants, why the fuck should I bother shooting a bullet for u since u urself are unwilling to shoot one for urself?

    i aint superman, santa claus aint real, theres no tooth fairy & there is no free entitlement system- neither in life nor love-

  • @swu880 If you treated me with a knife and i did not refuse, would you create a reason in your mind why you choose to stab me? You dont have an opinion? I would not harm anyone just cause i can, cause i choose not to be selfish and arrogant. We all have an opportunity to choose what we do based upon compassion or not compassion. What do you choose to represent in this world? If there`s not a unity in love then what is love to you? Greed is not love is it?

  • @fremmed1

    lol what is greed first of all? if u watched the vids i have linked above, watched those movies like the fountainhead, read atlas shrugged & the article i had linked, then u would know the virtue for caring for & loving oneself- the virtue of REAL selfishness & greed

  • @swu880

    if u want to be "responsible for another", then should they die, u are held solely responsible. cuz i aint responsible for anyone else but me. And thus when they die, u as their slave by ur own virtue & reasoning ought die for violating ur highest virtue- the selfless servitude of others.

  • @swu880

    Selflessness is evil to its core. if u are selfless, u have sacrificed urself. sacrificing urself, u have forfeited ur rights. And to whom have u forfeited ur rights & property & life? Some collective unknown?

    Altruism has nothing to do with compassion! self sacrifice is the RHETORIC used by dictators & tyrants. It was the frontline of hitler's speeches.

  • @swu880 Selfishness is only "evil" when we choose to accept it in our mind that it is evil. It is nothing outside yourself who decide this things. Selfishness is Love in its core cause you always need to start with YOU. You can not create love in your life before you love yourself! Tyrants are the product of YOU without love. Therefore you become a robot who needs to be told what to do, how to "get love" from the "promised one".

  • @fremmed1

    sigh- go read the book & watch the movies & vids i have mentioned & linked. u do not even know what rational selfishness means. If u do not even wish to go look up these vids, articles & movies, u dont even know of what u are speakin of & any further discussion is meaningless.

    Selfishness is a virtue- selflessness is evil itself (it was the rhetoric of selflessness & altruism which hitler & many dictators use to cause the multitude to submit)

  • @swu880

    If u actually use ur brain, does it matter whether ur 2 years old or 10 years old or 100 years old? no - cuz the virtue of the rational self interest persists so long as u give a damn about ur life, ur rights & property.

    love is secondary- ur own life comes first. And ur own happiness is its objective. ayn rand has already discussed quite thoroughly about these topics- like how love of others can not be more important than the love of self.

  • @swu880

    Unless u actually go read her works, & research, ur just another willfully ignorant fool who does not know the first meaning of rights. The US was founded not on some altruistic or socialistic agenda, not on any entitlement system but on individualism & the rights of individuals.

    dont comment back until u have thoroughly read through her works especially atlas shrugged & watched the fountainhead

  • @swu880 I know about the care for yourself mentality, ok. You are 21 years old. You have a lot to learn. Look at your mother.When you where borned she loved you more than life itself and would give her own life to protect you. Why dont you trie to convince her about this "only care about yourelf" mentality, hum? A love witch only care about YOU or only ME is not love, its selfishness witch came from FEAR. The fear of not controll what you include.

  • @swu880 And you did not answer my question. Would you stab me? And if, yes, for what reason?

  • @fremmed1

    ayn rand already made the argument for me- i need not repeat it here yet again. please go read her works

  • @swu880 I know the basics of Rands attitudes and outlooks. I saw the film clip, Fountainhead and it did not give me anything i did not already know about. It`s wery interesting, but there`s some essential views i think has been "forgotten" in all this.

    Ok, you refere to others instead of saying what YOU mean. One thing is how to explane how thing ARE based on different angles. But, then we can also discuss HOW we want things to be.

  • @fremmed1

    apparently u did not finish reading & fully understand the Rand's position. study up on where she is coming from. Look up her spectacular argument for capitalism & the objective rationality of man over the irrational socialistic altuistic systems we see today. Unlike altruism, mysticism, & bs christianity, objectivism covers an entire philosophy & incorporates the full faculty of the human mind. It does not rely on any emotional whims or the dictates of others.

  • @swu880 Rands books are among the bestsellers in USA together with Mr Hubbard (scientology church) in a period the american society and its values resolved and the people searched for new thinking. The main reason why she got attention and why shes not wery "pop" in the filosophic schoolos, is caused by her "easy to get"" versions. Witch means she explaned fx egoism, ethics, individual freedom etc in this wrong vs right- way and hated things like subjectism, mystisism, alturism etc.

  • @fremmed1 ts more of a personal strivation- you tell me- where is the resistance?

    all this wishy washy crap aint gonna do anything. if u want to live life, u gotta take it by the reigns, accept reality as is, A is A. if u cant accept A as A, then nothing else matters- life aint worth living.

    if u aint gonna stand up for urself, if u aint gonna live for urself, who is gonna live for u? i got my own life to live thank u very much- no time to live urs or hear any of ur bs excuses

  • @swu880 What do you mean strivation? Of course you got to stand up for yourself and A is A. Compassion do not reduce freedom. If you care about yourself and got enough self confidence and the most important of all, controll. Controll is not reduction of freedom it is the controll that makes us see the conection between every form of repercussions of our choises. If freedom create pain, exploiting, seperation etc, well responsibilitie then? What do responsibilitie buy without compassion?

  • @swu880 What define "strong"? Is it the width of your arm or the width of your mind?

    What define "intelligence"? Is it the amount of scars on your skin or the thoughts in your mind? What define weak then? In how many ways could you measure the reasons why you can see yourself in one way or another? What define humiliation? Is it what others do to you?

    No (!) It is how YOU react that define what YOU think about what happens.

    So who creates the "humiliated", hmm?

  • She said, "you're dat." Not "ducked."

  • I think she says "You Suck"

  • "dat", "fat" same difference, XD

  • And this my friends is the basis for the Secret ..

  • @Irina1718 sorry i had to use this reply as the only way to get a comment on here,,, the Irish guy saying that there is "no good or bad", really, has he ever met a child murderer, and then met a completely non violent person, i wonder if he did, if he would still say that "there is no good or bad", what a wanker, delluded to the point of incarceration in a phsyc. facility!!!

  • @boazandjiacinth I think if you went through what that child went through, you would become a murderer as well. Children don't know any better... they do what they are taught is right based on what they see around them.

  • @boazandjiacinth also my further comment is more contreversial but what makes murder 'wrong' ? we see it in wild life all the time.. animals do it to each other. We live in a world where in order to survive we have to murder either directly or indirectly... if you belive in God .. that is the world God created for us.

  • @Irina1718 Animals do not murder each other, a lion or shark has no choice in killing, however humans do not have to murder each other, its a choice or a lack of control or ignorance that makes humans murder each other.

  • @MPedroful Either way, we live in a world where we have to kill to survive, sad but true. Whether you killed that cow for your burger or somebody else did, nevertheless its still dead.

  • @Irina1718 I totally understand we have to kill to eat whether we pull an apple off a tree or kill a deer. I just have a problem with calling it murder. Murder is willful and not a part of survival or nutrition.

  • @MPedroful Sure, I understand. But what if you were to kill another human, and then eat it? Does that categorize it as nutrition and therefore make it okay?

  • your ducked!...I heet uu!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more