ANYONE: If you see nor repies to some posters they know they are on ignore for past personal insults, name calling etc. I would like to dispel some of the disinfo and illogical thinking that I believe I see in their responses, but one can only have a true debate with those who are civil & objective.
"ANYONE: If you see nor repies to some posters they know they are on ignore for past personal insults, name calling etc"
Sorry but just ignore is not an appropriate answer! By the way, I tried to explain in the past with logical point what evolution is. You did not understand. Some elementary school lessons were, I supposed, clear enough to explain evolution. You did not take the remarks in account.
Scripture or irreducible complexicty are not valid argument! Once again!
@LoricaLady You know I can create a website and copy and paste all our email exchange and we will see what was the true debate. I can even go through all the videos comments we did and see who is right.
Clearly, regarding all your recent comments, you did not go further in your research than 3 years ago... You still repeat the same things and so far I have never seen one evidence to believe in creation.
Probably because I superimpose all together, not just one specific point.
@LoricaLady Looking at one comment about whale evolution. Did you have a look to mammals who actually live in water environement. I am not talking about dolphin or whale. But about Beavers.... Did you make the link between the tail position? Why fishes tails are in parallele with the symetry and aquatic mammals in perpendicular?? Because such as beaver, the come from terrestrial animal!
@MattleSystem I forgot to mention the sea lion, the walrus etc... Just look at the anatomy, you don't need to believe, it is already there and visible! open your eyes!
Ken Miller is the most gentle, polite, well-spoken, humorous and honest scientist I've ever heard speak. I emailed him once and he immediately responded with an answer. The only reason not to include him in this movie is that he would have ruined the dishonest message.
@busymartian Miller undermines basic logic & science. On the Colbert show he said that as a Roman Catholic he believes "Jesus Christ is the Creator of all that is seen and unseen." Then he has workshops on The Collapse of Intelligent Design! So he thinks the Creator he says he believes in is stupid? He wants to say he believes in Jesus but will go to court to fight anyone who believes the Creator could actually create plants & animals fully formed. Colbert mentioned the primal pond.Cont.
@busymartian Cont. That was a great "teachable moment." As a scientist Miller could have told Colbert & the audience that there isn't a shred of evidence for the primal pond & that, as the LAW of biogenesis says, all life comes from life. That's whatt has been observed historically. 100% of times. But he didn't say a word, just let Colbert's words go on by for people to believe in. Miller used a mangled mousetrap to supposedly destroy Michael Behe's example of irredicuible complexity. Cont.
@busymartian Cont. As usual with evolutionary arguments we are just asked to belieeeve,i.e. that the mangled trap would catch "really stupid mice" tho we are given 0 evidence for that - i.e. videos of dumb mice being caught. He even asks people to believe that the mousetrap could catch mice with nothing more than a piece of cheese and the coil - again with 0 evidence. And all those invisible mice would still be caught by something made with intelligent design. Come out of the matrix friend.
@LoricaLady Evolution does not ask to believe, but to understand. The mouse trap model is showing you that every component of your body for example in an association of several pieces. Each pieces can have a proper function but can do something different or more complex when associated.
The other point behind this model is that you are made from carbon, calcium, atom of oxygen and hydrogen etc... You are an association of individual elements without function (purpose), just chemical reaction
Evolution does not try to answer the question of how life began. Humanity simply does not know the answers and we may never know them. There is a reason that intelligent design is disregarded by the scientific community. There is absolutely no evidence of intelligent design. Intelligent Design was created without scientific process; in fact it was created using wild imaginations. Could life have been created by intelligent design? SURE! Do we have any evidence of this, what so ever? NO!!
ANYONE: If you see nor repies to some posters they know they are on ignore for past personal insults, name calling etc. I would like to dispel some of the disinfo and illogical thinking that I believe I see in their responses, but one can only have a true debate with those who are civil & objective.
LoricaLady 3 months ago
"ANYONE: If you see nor repies to some posters they know they are on ignore for past personal insults, name calling etc"
Sorry but just ignore is not an appropriate answer! By the way, I tried to explain in the past with logical point what evolution is. You did not understand. Some elementary school lessons were, I supposed, clear enough to explain evolution. You did not take the remarks in account.
Scripture or irreducible complexicty are not valid argument! Once again!
MattleSystem 3 months ago
@LoricaLady You know I can create a website and copy and paste all our email exchange and we will see what was the true debate. I can even go through all the videos comments we did and see who is right.
Clearly, regarding all your recent comments, you did not go further in your research than 3 years ago... You still repeat the same things and so far I have never seen one evidence to believe in creation.
Probably because I superimpose all together, not just one specific point.
MattleSystem 3 months ago
@LoricaLady Looking at one comment about whale evolution. Did you have a look to mammals who actually live in water environement. I am not talking about dolphin or whale. But about Beavers.... Did you make the link between the tail position? Why fishes tails are in parallele with the symetry and aquatic mammals in perpendicular?? Because such as beaver, the come from terrestrial animal!
MattleSystem 3 months ago
@MattleSystem I forgot to mention the sea lion, the walrus etc... Just look at the anatomy, you don't need to believe, it is already there and visible! open your eyes!
MattleSystem 3 months ago
Comment removed
LoricaLady 3 months ago
Another interesting tidbit: the Big Bang Theory was developed by a Catholic priest.
terminaldeity 2 years ago
I agree he's a dishonest scumbag, but sweet Christ are his old weather reports funny..
Questpeace 3 years ago
Different Mark Mathis.
Liface 2 years ago
amazing what lense caps can do these days.
smoker22343 3 years ago
Oddly enough, making artificially intelligent lenscaps is very easy, it's just extremely difficult to adapt that technology elsewhere.
devourerofbabies 3 years ago
Expelled will die a swift death. $500,000 the first weekend, then pulled from all but a handful of screens by the second week.
Richardgwm 3 years ago 4
Ken Miller is the most gentle, polite, well-spoken, humorous and honest scientist I've ever heard speak. I emailed him once and he immediately responded with an answer. The only reason not to include him in this movie is that he would have ruined the dishonest message.
busymartian 3 years ago 10
"The only reason not to include him in this movie is that he would have ruined the dishonest message."
That or they would have had to include the Dover trial, which utterly destroyed ID.
Amusing, isn't it?
ThatOneQ 3 years ago 6
He is a nice guy. I emailed him a couple of times and he does reply quickly. He is also very humble. It's a pity they didn't interview him.
questionsamson 2 years ago
Comment removed
LoricaLady 3 months ago
Comment removed
LoricaLady 3 months ago
@busymartian Miller undermines basic logic & science. On the Colbert show he said that as a Roman Catholic he believes "Jesus Christ is the Creator of all that is seen and unseen." Then he has workshops on The Collapse of Intelligent Design! So he thinks the Creator he says he believes in is stupid? He wants to say he believes in Jesus but will go to court to fight anyone who believes the Creator could actually create plants & animals fully formed. Colbert mentioned the primal pond.Cont.
LoricaLady 3 months ago
@busymartian Cont. That was a great "teachable moment." As a scientist Miller could have told Colbert & the audience that there isn't a shred of evidence for the primal pond & that, as the LAW of biogenesis says, all life comes from life. That's whatt has been observed historically. 100% of times. But he didn't say a word, just let Colbert's words go on by for people to believe in. Miller used a mangled mousetrap to supposedly destroy Michael Behe's example of irredicuible complexity. Cont.
LoricaLady 3 months ago
@busymartian Cont. As usual with evolutionary arguments we are just asked to belieeeve,i.e. that the mangled trap would catch "really stupid mice" tho we are given 0 evidence for that - i.e. videos of dumb mice being caught. He even asks people to believe that the mousetrap could catch mice with nothing more than a piece of cheese and the coil - again with 0 evidence. And all those invisible mice would still be caught by something made with intelligent design. Come out of the matrix friend.
LoricaLady 3 months ago
@LoricaLady Evolution does not ask to believe, but to understand. The mouse trap model is showing you that every component of your body for example in an association of several pieces. Each pieces can have a proper function but can do something different or more complex when associated.
The other point behind this model is that you are made from carbon, calcium, atom of oxygen and hydrogen etc... You are an association of individual elements without function (purpose), just chemical reaction
MattleSystem 3 months ago 3
Comment removed
LoricaLady 3 months ago
Evolution does not try to answer the question of how life began. Humanity simply does not know the answers and we may never know them. There is a reason that intelligent design is disregarded by the scientific community. There is absolutely no evidence of intelligent design. Intelligent Design was created without scientific process; in fact it was created using wild imaginations. Could life have been created by intelligent design? SURE! Do we have any evidence of this, what so ever? NO!!
rogersmithbigo 3 years ago 4
we don't want America confused in the wrong way its only our own confusion we want to impose on America.
jehovahgodofgaps 3 years ago 3