Who cares in the slightest about Toynbee or Dawkins on questions of philosophy. These two don't know the first thing about the subject. It would be like asking a north american about evolution - utterly pointless!!!
This is bullshit. Sure pick on God, but leave Krishna and Budha out of it. Why is it suddenly alright to publicly denounce Christianity and not any other religion?
ok if i say that all Christians are going to go to a lake of fire, on a bus i'm gessing that you are not going to like that are you?but if i say that someone wih a different view as you, you wont care at all.
That is complete bullshit. I would care, seeing as I think that no one should be putting anything reflecting intolerance and prejudice of any kind on a bus, or elsewhere, especially where religion is concerned. I'm shocked that anything like it is happening in my country since we're supposed to be open and 'multicultural'.
it is not intolerance or prejudice, its just giving another opinion and the term god is suppose to encompass all figureheads of regligion. much like in god we trust does not mean the christian god in the USA. its ok for religions to going around enforcing their view on people why cant atheists do the same.
You have a very selfish view of "god". Are you too ignorant to realize that this includes any god and not just the christian god? It does not say "Yahweh probably doesn't exist", although he probably doesn't.
I have to admit there could be a celestial teapot orbiting the sun between the orbits of earth and mars as well, someone could have designed it and set it on its orbit.
Consequences for my life=0
There is probably no teapot orbiting the sun between earth and mars, now stop caring and spent time with people you love.
because the time, energy, money is a waste of resources. the wars fought for your teapot "god" will kill n descriminate multitrudes of generations. all in his name. you will indocinate, push an shove your beliefs on children, people of new foundlands and creep into education, politics and social activity. and never having to ever show proof. and claiming you know or feel is evidence enough.
"they have to take offence, it's the only weapon they've got."
Dead right. And as soon as all decent, rational people stop buying into that tawdry "don't tell me the truth because I'm offended by it "crap, the sooner all mankind will be free of the toxins religions generate.
Gee, I'd love to debate you all round the ring but it really wouldn't help you, and clealry you don't have anything of merit to say except to suggest that there's someone famous who's smart who you imagine agrees with what you believe. Makes a change to have a bull-nosed agnostic hurling insults rather than the usual chris-chin mob. But the errot in your argument is the same. Suggesting atheists are arrogant is just ye olde ad hominem fallacy.
All you have is abuse. You have no proposition to debate. And I'm sure if you did you'd only have your tawdry insults to reinforce it. You just aren't interesting enough to engage with.
maybe Dawkins could become a columnist in The Guardian? Can't imagine he and Polly would agree on everything, but I'm sure he'd be at home amongst the regular opinion/editorial writers. And since he's retired from Oxford surely he has some extra time to bang out a few hundred words each week.
Well. Nice to see there is so much interest in this video. Just over 7,000 views in three weeks! People just aren't interested. I've just visited a video posted a few days ago by a Northern Irish guy talking for 2 minutes about his attempts to speak Korean, and it has got 110,000 views already. This 'campaign' was a total waste of time and money. A typical 'intellectual' exercise in stupidity. Toynbee and Dawkins need to see a psychiatrist urgently.
If you watched the video at all, Richard Dawkins rightly points out that 'taking offence' is the only weapon religious people have got. And try revising your grammar before calling me an idiot...
I'm 18 years old so Im not sure how I can be a 'lonely paedophile' lol. How dare you suggest something like that about people you don't even know. Atheist or not, what does that have to do with being a paedophile?
You want to put atheists in 'jail' because we DON'T believe in a fictional sky hook, is that correct?
Let's see if u can reply intelligently without resorting to swear words this time...go on, challenge yourself.
Inteligency?!?! buwhahah you come from a fucking APE thats why all atheists are retards and losers ,people without life that should move their asses to work not to bark. fucking "ape" relatives
We ALL evolved from 'fucking apes' actually. What right do you have to brand all atheists 'retards' and 'losers'? Life is rather fullfiliing when you let go of fairy stories.
No, the word I used was 'Intellligently'. If you can't read as well as write, please think before labelling me the retard.
By all means carry on. You're only demonstrating Richard's point :)
And, of course, Ms Sherine (who??), who in light of the failure of this campaign to generate any interest is now unlikely to secure the invitation to a spot in the next Celebrity Big Brother.
The most visits any site discussing this issue have received, as far as I can see, is the discussion of the Fox News coverage in the US, which to date has received about 11,000, and of course that is directed at US interests and their perspective. This 'campaign' has been a waste of money on an issue nobody cares about other than Richard Dawkins and his Oxford chums who have a direct interest (book sales) in keeping it going. He needs to get back to biology.
I think the point and importance of this campaign is perhaps best demonstrated by the total lack of interest people have in visiting this post. To date, since 6th January, it has failed to register even 2,500 visits. Last night I noticed a site by someone discussing the decision of Waltham Forest Council to move a chip shop 100 metres down the High Street to discourage youngsters from visiting it at lunchtime has received nearly 80,000 since 9th January. People are not interested.
Oh, and I am now waiting for all those same people to show their incredible humour (!!) by a barrage of comments using the word. I had better get my corset ready, just to make sure my sides don't split!!
This campaign began apparently because atheists 'took offence' at an advertisement placed by people atheists believe to be fantasists and referring to a hell they do not believe to exist. I find it incredibly difficult to understand why? The world simply cannot function without tolerance, on ALL sides; nature does not and neither can we. I would also wonder whether, logically kazi, 'taking offence' is an argument; it seems to me to be a 'reaction'.
I'm an atheist, and I look at the world without religion. Religions biased the mind, and enslaves the people to modern reality. However though, I do think that their may have well have been a creator, who's mind is so advanced, that it is able to predict every output and input, that let up to human's, intelligent life. It may have influenced the evolution of human beings.
Just keep your mind open. Unless your religious, then you I guess you can't.
You make an interesting point, tomme. Apparently this campaign was a response to a 'Christian' advertisement/poster which offended a number of atheists. It does seem to me that tolerance and respect, on all sides, is rapidly being swept away. Surely there must come a time when reasonable, tolerant and decent people, whatever their worldview, be it Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs, Muslims, Christians, Atheists, or any other, stand up and say that we just want a tolerant society.
I don't disagree, Chare. The problem is, there are also plenty of 'Christians' ready to inflame people too. Fundamentalism of ANY kind, religious or atheist, seems to me to be an unhelpful approach. We should actually be looking for those things that unite us, rather than polarising on the basis that we don't agree with another's worldview. If you are a decent person, work hard, obey the laws of the land and tolerant, does it matter what worldview you have?
Most religious people are 100% pussies. The don't make decisons based on their own morals, they make decisions based on other peoples morals, who took the time to put the religion that they believe in together. Go ahead, burn down all the trees, kill all animals until they go instict. Becauses that's not a sin. Religous people would be the pussies, because their not strong enough, to make their own decisions, and make decisions based on their true morals. They need a book to tell them what to do
Don't you think morality is an instinctive thing, Alex? You don't necessarily need a religious faith, or indeed supporting religious texts, to tell you that murder is wrong, that stealing is wrong, that telling lies is wrong. These are self-evident to any decent human being, as natural as breathing, eating and sleeping. Many people of religious faith believe that all their scripture does is confirm what the human condition already makes obvious.
0292 etc: You are quite right in some ways. I guess if you go to buy a pint of milk, get to the supermarket and the carton says on it 'This carton PROBABLY contains milk' you might think twice about buying it. Or perhaps you want to visit the Eiffel Tower, get on the plane in London and the captain says over the intercom 'This plane is probably going to Paris'. I'd 'probably' get off. My main concern is EVERYONE, Christians, non-Christians, Muslims, need more tolerance. Society is failing.
If anyone would like to get involved in this 'Campaign for Tolerance', I would be happy to hear from them; atheists, those of whatever religious belief, those who simply want to see a more tolerant society, which MUST surely be the basis for the kind of society most of us would like to live in. As I say, I would be happy to hear from anyone who is interested in 'getting on board' (a 'Tolerance Bus'?).
My point, rudy, was simply that we need a new way of thinking, and it has to start somewhere. Respect and tolerance, however you look at it, are disappearing fast, and it an issue that we ALL have to address. I am not sure 'tit for tat' (witness the Gaza situation) ever solves anything; it just polarises people. People should be bigger than that, and responsibility begins with us as individuals.
yes good luck with that. You didn't invent Respect and Tolerance mate, it's just that some people (quite often religious/mystic nutjobs) take advantage of this e.g. Gaza, where Israelis have had to tolerate, amongst other violence, endless rocket attacks and the enduring antisemitism of the world.
The Athiest bus campaign is a great little initiative to remind the part of the world which gave us the beauty of the Enlightenment that there is no need to turn the clock back and do it again.
Thanks, thudds. I know I didn't invent Respect and Tolerance. Ariane Sherine has not invented atheism either. Nor did 'religious nutjobs' invent Auschwitz or the gulags in Soviet Russia. Atheist fundamentalism poses as many worrying issues as religious fundamentalism, it may be argued. My concern is the growth of intolerance in an increasingly insecure world, and I do not necessarily see this as purely a religious issue. If atheists need 'reminding', maybe the world needs to remember respect.
In the next few weeks, I am going to work on the nuts and bolts of a 'tolerance' campaign. I actually believe that most people ARE tolerant, caring, understanding and have a good heart. The problem is the silent majority are being rather overwhelmed by the extremities. Perhaps it is time for those who are tolerant to be encouraged to express and promote that sensitively and with some degree of pride in themselves.
What needs to be promoted is both tolerance and respect. I have wondered, in the light of this campaign, whether those of us who actually believe tolerance and respect for others' beliefs is something worth building on could not begin our own campaign and promote it in this kind of way. We all know that Richard and Polly find those with religious faith 'infantile' (I quote Polly from an article she wrote in the Guardian just before Christmas), but we need to be bigger than that.
I believe that the biggest issue here is one of intolerance; we are rapidly becoming a society where we people simply cannot tolerate that someone else has a different world view. I say this equally of SOME of those who have religious belief, and SOME atheists. Surely, surely, surely, we can ALL respect that someone else has a different worldview, whatever that may be, and learn to live alongside each other without the need for this kind of approach.
Wow! Well, thanks, now my thoughts are straying. Of course, we could use this to our advantage, "Hey theists, look who we've got on OUR side!" and then show them Ariane.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
It seeems Ariane is wasting herself. Reading these comments I'm certain that she would be able to convert many atheists even to Islam if she wanted ;)
I saw her first! And besides I already purchased my tickets to London.
Once I've found her I will sing her songs of my undying love for her unimaginable beauty until she can no longer resist and falls madly in love with me.
Id love to meet Richard Dawkins in person. I am not one that feels the need to get peoples autographs, but i would definitely like to get a signed copy of The God Delusion.
I give the young lady a thumbs up for this also, good idea, turn it around on em'.
Wait! Did he just say there's no Father Christmas? No way! I want proof!
brandstifter68 2 years ago
Great campaign. Don't let Christians put you off - they're just terrified of the truth and too deeply and almost incurably indoctrinated.
brandstifter68 2 years ago
Who cares in the slightest about Toynbee or Dawkins on questions of philosophy. These two don't know the first thing about the subject. It would be like asking a north american about evolution - utterly pointless!!!
dooyeweerd 2 years ago
When parents tell their children santa does not exists they should say "santa probably does not exist". ;)
DoomNoMore 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
THERE IS ONLY ONE GOD FOR FUCK SAKE
tominybikes 2 years ago
and that one god is ME 8)
chip279 2 years ago 2
isnt atheism the belief in god and not the belief in religion ??
tominybikes 2 years ago
@tominybikes I think you're thinking of deism.
MrStevenWO 1 year ago
The two of them seem to be so warmhearted...
Johnnyfortune82 2 years ago
This is bullshit. Sure pick on God, but leave Krishna and Budha out of it. Why is it suddenly alright to publicly denounce Christianity and not any other religion?
xNightshadex 2 years ago
Becuse faith haters are cowards?
CHARESTHEHAMER 2 years ago
Agreed.
xNightshadex 2 years ago
they say GOD that means all gods not just your god.
korn2600 2 years ago
That's not the first thing that comes to people's mind and they know it. Plus in this video she's talking predominately about Christianity.
xNightshadex 2 years ago
ok if i say that all Christians are going to go to a lake of fire, on a bus i'm gessing that you are not going to like that are you?but if i say that someone wih a different view as you, you wont care at all.
korn2600 2 years ago
That is complete bullshit. I would care, seeing as I think that no one should be putting anything reflecting intolerance and prejudice of any kind on a bus, or elsewhere, especially where religion is concerned. I'm shocked that anything like it is happening in my country since we're supposed to be open and 'multicultural'.
xNightshadex 2 years ago
"especially where religion is concerned" why is this? and the bus ads are in the U.K. not in the USA. are you in the U.K.?
korn2600 2 years ago
it is not intolerance or prejudice, its just giving another opinion and the term god is suppose to encompass all figureheads of regligion. much like in god we trust does not mean the christian god in the USA. its ok for religions to going around enforcing their view on people why cant atheists do the same.
piro6220 2 years ago 2
You have a very selfish view of "god". Are you too ignorant to realize that this includes any god and not just the christian god? It does not say "Yahweh probably doesn't exist", although he probably doesn't.
NitB92 2 years ago 5
which god are they picking on it doesn't say which it just says god it doesn't say yahweh they aren't picking on "christians"
yahyahtoopy 2 years ago
God is a term used to refer to all gods, not just the Christian god - look it up in the dictionary...
yukimushu 2 years ago 3
We need more of these buses..and then drive a few of them through churches and Christian camps etc.
dmustard11 3 years ago
Please do it's funny that the best you can come up with is probably.
CHARESTHEHAMER 3 years ago
Well I believe God definitely doesn't, but a campaign like the one above couldn't really say that - it would cause more controversey.
dmustard11 3 years ago
It's sad all that trash talking but the bottom line is even dawkins has to admit (much to his anger) that God could exist.
CHARESTHEHAMER 3 years ago
where was the anger?
I have to admit there could be a celestial teapot orbiting the sun between the orbits of earth and mars as well, someone could have designed it and set it on its orbit.
Consequences for my life=0
There is probably no teapot orbiting the sun between earth and mars, now stop caring and spent time with people you love.
RationalEmotive 3 years ago
what's so upseting about people believing in said teapot?
CHARESTHEHAMER 3 years ago
So why do you believe in God?
madboy003 3 years ago
The hamer is an agnostic.
CHARESTHEHAMER 3 years ago
lol did you just refer to youself in the third person
peenishead 3 years ago
lol
peenishead?
CHARESTHEHAMER 3 years ago
ya bro thats my name... like my real name
its fucked
peenishead 3 years ago
lol
I hate to hear your sisters name.
CHARESTHEHAMER 3 years ago
because the time, energy, money is a waste of resources. the wars fought for your teapot "god" will kill n descriminate multitrudes of generations. all in his name. you will indocinate, push an shove your beliefs on children, people of new foundlands and creep into education, politics and social activity. and never having to ever show proof. and claiming you know or feel is evidence enough.
slugworth28 2 years ago
The same way the invisible pink unicorn COULD exist.
RobertAndGiovanni 2 years ago
What's so frightening about an invisible pink unicorn?
CHARESTHEHAMER 2 years ago
yawn
DeJay14 2 years ago
"they have to take offence, it's the only weapon they've got."
Dead right. And as soon as all decent, rational people stop buying into that tawdry "don't tell me the truth because I'm offended by it "crap, the sooner all mankind will be free of the toxins religions generate.
Oceanus57 3 years ago
He forgets laughing at you arrogant twats.
CHARESTHEHAMER 3 years ago
Oh yeah, that's another of your tawdry god-botherer ripostes - "if you don't believe what I believe you must be arrogant."
Doesn't really work though, does it, you slimy, grovelling, god-bothering coward?
Oceanus57 3 years ago
The hamer is an agnostic dipshit.
CHARESTHEHAMER 3 years ago
Yeah, I already had you down as a "don't know".
Oh no, sorry, look, I put "clueless".
Same thing really.
Oceanus57 3 years ago
Yep me and warren buffett.
just a couple of clueless knobs compare to all knowing you.
CHARESTHEHAMER 3 years ago
Gee, I'd love to debate you all round the ring but it really wouldn't help you, and clealry you don't have anything of merit to say except to suggest that there's someone famous who's smart who you imagine agrees with what you believe. Makes a change to have a bull-nosed agnostic hurling insults rather than the usual chris-chin mob. But the errot in your argument is the same. Suggesting atheists are arrogant is just ye olde ad hominem fallacy.
If that's all you got, you got nowt, lad.
Oceanus57 3 years ago
That's right try to draw attention away from your accusing agnostics of being clueless.
CHARESTHEHAMER 3 years ago
Your tactic to start with the insults.
And it's pretty clear you're kind of arrogant yourself.
So that's the end of our little conversation.
Nice to see the don't knows having a bit of passion in support of their indifferent beliefs.
Have a nice day.
Oceanus57 3 years ago
Leaving already?
Yet another atheist bottom feeder who can't defend his own words.
CHARESTHEHAMER 3 years ago
All you have is abuse. You have no proposition to debate. And I'm sure if you did you'd only have your tawdry insults to reinforce it. You just aren't interesting enough to engage with.
Oceanus57 3 years ago
Still no attempt to defend your words?
lol
CHARESTHEHAMER 3 years ago
Is it like a game where the last one to post is the loser? Is that all you got?
Oceanus57 3 years ago
maybe Dawkins could become a columnist in The Guardian? Can't imagine he and Polly would agree on everything, but I'm sure he'd be at home amongst the regular opinion/editorial writers. And since he's retired from Oxford surely he has some extra time to bang out a few hundred words each week.
rubensni 3 years ago
Comment removed
fletzy44 3 years ago
Well. Nice to see there is so much interest in this video. Just over 7,000 views in three weeks! People just aren't interested. I've just visited a video posted a few days ago by a Northern Irish guy talking for 2 minutes about his attempts to speak Korean, and it has got 110,000 views already. This 'campaign' was a total waste of time and money. A typical 'intellectual' exercise in stupidity. Toynbee and Dawkins need to see a psychiatrist urgently.
fletzy44 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck atheist. i am not a religious person but i belive there is a God. anyway FUCK THESE STUPID WANKERS. ATHEISTS hahahah fucking retarded monkeys
FYR0MCO 3 years ago
proving what Dawkins just said...
gullzasd 3 years ago 2
using up your only weapon, eh FYR0MCO?
SparrowisSexy 3 years ago
what? go in jungle idiot
FYR0MCO 3 years ago
If you watched the video at all, Richard Dawkins rightly points out that 'taking offence' is the only weapon religious people have got. And try revising your grammar before calling me an idiot...
SparrowisSexy 3 years ago
He forgets laughing at you arrogant twats.
CHARESTHEHAMER 3 years ago
You are fucked in your head! No wonder all atheists are retards and lonely pedophiles. JAIL FOR ATHEISTS
hahahaha wankers
FYR0MCO 3 years ago
I'm 18 years old so Im not sure how I can be a 'lonely paedophile' lol. How dare you suggest something like that about people you don't even know. Atheist or not, what does that have to do with being a paedophile?
You want to put atheists in 'jail' because we DON'T believe in a fictional sky hook, is that correct?
Let's see if u can reply intelligently without resorting to swear words this time...go on, challenge yourself.
SparrowisSexy 3 years ago
Inteligency?!?! buwhahah you come from a fucking APE thats why all atheists are retards and losers ,people without life that should move their asses to work not to bark. fucking "ape" relatives
FYR0MCO 3 years ago
We ALL evolved from 'fucking apes' actually. What right do you have to brand all atheists 'retards' and 'losers'? Life is rather fullfiliing when you let go of fairy stories.
No, the word I used was 'Intellligently'. If you can't read as well as write, please think before labelling me the retard.
By all means carry on. You're only demonstrating Richard's point :)
SparrowisSexy 3 years ago
Than again YOU have ape relatives too.
And you sure do a good job of showing it.
gilli39 3 years ago
you're very clever!
chars101 3 years ago
Dawkins...How I love thee ;)
SparrowisSexy 3 years ago
Yes. Pray to your God - while he's still here. :)
fletzy44 3 years ago
Is that a death threat? lol
SparrowisSexy 3 years ago
No, he's calling you a Dawkins fanatic.
Christfags don't understand that you can respect someone without sucking their dick.
Greywyn7 3 years ago
Hey, sparrow. We are ALL under a death threat! In fact, it isn't a threat; it's an inevitability! :)
fletzy44 3 years ago
And, of course, Ms Sherine (who??), who in light of the failure of this campaign to generate any interest is now unlikely to secure the invitation to a spot in the next Celebrity Big Brother.
fletzy44 3 years ago
The most visits any site discussing this issue have received, as far as I can see, is the discussion of the Fox News coverage in the US, which to date has received about 11,000, and of course that is directed at US interests and their perspective. This 'campaign' has been a waste of money on an issue nobody cares about other than Richard Dawkins and his Oxford chums who have a direct interest (book sales) in keeping it going. He needs to get back to biology.
fletzy44 3 years ago
I think the point and importance of this campaign is perhaps best demonstrated by the total lack of interest people have in visiting this post. To date, since 6th January, it has failed to register even 2,500 visits. Last night I noticed a site by someone discussing the decision of Waltham Forest Council to move a chip shop 100 metres down the High Street to discourage youngsters from visiting it at lunchtime has received nearly 80,000 since 9th January. People are not interested.
fletzy44 3 years ago
I <3 Richard Dawkins.
Shmebber 3 years ago
Oh, and I am now waiting for all those same people to show their incredible humour (!!) by a barrage of comments using the word. I had better get my corset ready, just to make sure my sides don't split!!
fletzy44 3 years ago
"religion has no arguments, taking offense is the only argument they've got"
Richard Dawkins is the man!
kaziqbal 3 years ago 2
This campaign began apparently because atheists 'took offence' at an advertisement placed by people atheists believe to be fantasists and referring to a hell they do not believe to exist. I find it incredibly difficult to understand why? The world simply cannot function without tolerance, on ALL sides; nature does not and neither can we. I would also wonder whether, logically kazi, 'taking offence' is an argument; it seems to me to be a 'reaction'.
fletzy44 3 years ago
I find this advertisemnt somewhat absurd.
I'm an atheist, and I look at the world without religion. Religions biased the mind, and enslaves the people to modern reality. However though, I do think that their may have well have been a creator, who's mind is so advanced, that it is able to predict every output and input, that let up to human's, intelligent life. It may have influenced the evolution of human beings.
Just keep your mind open. Unless your religious, then you I guess you can't.
xx1Alex1xx 3 years ago
Why isn't there an advert on the side of a bus stating "There is probably no Allah".
Shurely this would be more appropriate in the more diverse areas of the Capital........
tomme1981 3 years ago
You make an interesting point, tomme. Apparently this campaign was a response to a 'Christian' advertisement/poster which offended a number of atheists. It does seem to me that tolerance and respect, on all sides, is rapidly being swept away. Surely there must come a time when reasonable, tolerant and decent people, whatever their worldview, be it Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs, Muslims, Christians, Atheists, or any other, stand up and say that we just want a tolerant society.
fletzy44 3 years ago
You'd think so but so long as people like Dawkins and Fred Phelps do what they can to enflame people there will be suffering.
CHARESTHEHAMER 3 years ago
I don't disagree, Chare. The problem is, there are also plenty of 'Christians' ready to inflame people too. Fundamentalism of ANY kind, religious or atheist, seems to me to be an unhelpful approach. We should actually be looking for those things that unite us, rather than polarising on the basis that we don't agree with another's worldview. If you are a decent person, work hard, obey the laws of the land and tolerant, does it matter what worldview you have?
fletzy44 3 years ago
Because most atheists are 100% pussies.
CHARESTHEHAMER 3 years ago
Most religious people are 100% pussies. The don't make decisons based on their own morals, they make decisions based on other peoples morals, who took the time to put the religion that they believe in together. Go ahead, burn down all the trees, kill all animals until they go instict. Becauses that's not a sin. Religous people would be the pussies, because their not strong enough, to make their own decisions, and make decisions based on their true morals. They need a book to tell them what to do
xx1Alex1xx 3 years ago
lol.
Most of the military is religious.
CHARESTHEHAMER 3 years ago
Chare: When you say that 'Most of the military is religious', what do you mean? Are there any statistics about it? I'm just interested to know.
fletzy44 3 years ago
Don't you think morality is an instinctive thing, Alex? You don't necessarily need a religious faith, or indeed supporting religious texts, to tell you that murder is wrong, that stealing is wrong, that telling lies is wrong. These are self-evident to any decent human being, as natural as breathing, eating and sleeping. Many people of religious faith believe that all their scripture does is confirm what the human condition already makes obvious.
fletzy44 3 years ago
Yes, but "probably" is used because making a definite statement would make them as bad as the Christians.
GeneralFatman27 3 years ago
Hahaha you all spent money on advertising a slogan that misrepresents your true opinion as atheists.
There is no proof that there is a god just as there is no proof that god doesn't exist. To firmly believe either way is folly.
I'm not an atheist but your slogan is more a representation of my view than it is of yours.
02920497497 3 years ago
0292 etc: You are quite right in some ways. I guess if you go to buy a pint of milk, get to the supermarket and the carton says on it 'This carton PROBABLY contains milk' you might think twice about buying it. Or perhaps you want to visit the Eiffel Tower, get on the plane in London and the captain says over the intercom 'This plane is probably going to Paris'. I'd 'probably' get off. My main concern is EVERYONE, Christians, non-Christians, Muslims, need more tolerance. Society is failing.
fletzy44 3 years ago
it's a joint campaign with the humanists, ya jack ass.
rubensni 3 years ago
If anyone would like to get involved in this 'Campaign for Tolerance', I would be happy to hear from them; atheists, those of whatever religious belief, those who simply want to see a more tolerant society, which MUST surely be the basis for the kind of society most of us would like to live in. As I say, I would be happy to hear from anyone who is interested in 'getting on board' (a 'Tolerance Bus'?).
fletzy44 3 years ago
People who believe that those who don't agree with them will burn for all eternity cannot be tolerated by any decent person.
rudyhenkel 3 years ago
My point, rudy, was simply that we need a new way of thinking, and it has to start somewhere. Respect and tolerance, however you look at it, are disappearing fast, and it an issue that we ALL have to address. I am not sure 'tit for tat' (witness the Gaza situation) ever solves anything; it just polarises people. People should be bigger than that, and responsibility begins with us as individuals.
fletzy44 3 years ago
yes good luck with that. You didn't invent Respect and Tolerance mate, it's just that some people (quite often religious/mystic nutjobs) take advantage of this e.g. Gaza, where Israelis have had to tolerate, amongst other violence, endless rocket attacks and the enduring antisemitism of the world.
The Athiest bus campaign is a great little initiative to remind the part of the world which gave us the beauty of the Enlightenment that there is no need to turn the clock back and do it again.
thudds 3 years ago
Thanks, thudds. I know I didn't invent Respect and Tolerance. Ariane Sherine has not invented atheism either. Nor did 'religious nutjobs' invent Auschwitz or the gulags in Soviet Russia. Atheist fundamentalism poses as many worrying issues as religious fundamentalism, it may be argued. My concern is the growth of intolerance in an increasingly insecure world, and I do not necessarily see this as purely a religious issue. If atheists need 'reminding', maybe the world needs to remember respect.
fletzy44 3 years ago
In the next few weeks, I am going to work on the nuts and bolts of a 'tolerance' campaign. I actually believe that most people ARE tolerant, caring, understanding and have a good heart. The problem is the silent majority are being rather overwhelmed by the extremities. Perhaps it is time for those who are tolerant to be encouraged to express and promote that sensitively and with some degree of pride in themselves.
fletzy44 3 years ago
What needs to be promoted is both tolerance and respect. I have wondered, in the light of this campaign, whether those of us who actually believe tolerance and respect for others' beliefs is something worth building on could not begin our own campaign and promote it in this kind of way. We all know that Richard and Polly find those with religious faith 'infantile' (I quote Polly from an article she wrote in the Guardian just before Christmas), but we need to be bigger than that.
fletzy44 3 years ago
I believe that the biggest issue here is one of intolerance; we are rapidly becoming a society where we people simply cannot tolerate that someone else has a different world view. I say this equally of SOME of those who have religious belief, and SOME atheists. Surely, surely, surely, we can ALL respect that someone else has a different worldview, whatever that may be, and learn to live alongside each other without the need for this kind of approach.
fletzy44 3 years ago
Excellent work Ariane, Richard & Polly but with all due respect you needed Mr Hitchens if only to supply the liquor ;-)
Onward Bus of Reason!
thudds 3 years ago 4
He's also the only man who can make Dawkins the 'good cop'.
TheAbsurdHero 3 years ago
lol true! Oh dear, Ariane you've got the looks and the voice "Forgive me Richard, I've had unclean thoughts ..."
thudds 3 years ago 2
Wow! Well, thanks, now my thoughts are straying. Of course, we could use this to our advantage, "Hey theists, look who we've got on OUR side!" and then show them Ariane.
TheAbsurdHero 3 years ago
Indeed, though I think she's showing us up
thudds 3 years ago
You said it Richard. He speaks the muhafuckin truf!
StraightGodless 3 years ago
Very funny.
waveoflight 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It seeems Ariane is wasting herself. Reading these comments I'm certain that she would be able to convert many atheists even to Islam if she wanted ;)
LikeAPossum 3 years ago
Everybody all aboard!
Craydon 3 years ago
"They have to take offense. They have no decent argument; it's the only weapon they've got"
Classic, eloquent Dawkins.
Fordi 3 years ago 8
Oh my God I am straight up in love.
Ariane Sherine, you've stolen my heart and now I must seek you out.
Checking on travel expenses to England......
ogjimkenobi 3 years ago 8
Get away, she's mine!!!
closedmouth 3 years ago 2
I saw her first! And besides I already purchased my tickets to London.
Once I've found her I will sing her songs of my undying love for her unimaginable beauty until she can no longer resist and falls madly in love with me.
It's a foolproof plan.
ogjimkenobi 3 years ago 3
Id love to meet Richard Dawkins in person. I am not one that feels the need to get peoples autographs, but i would definitely like to get a signed copy of The God Delusion.
I give the young lady a thumbs up for this also, good idea, turn it around on em'.
ONEamWALKAH 3 years ago 2
Great video, LOVE RICHARD DAWKINS!!!!
AsylumArtLivan 3 years ago 2