@billjesusgates how do you know? so many scientists say that there is a divine creator and mathemeticians have done equations and proved that the balance in the universe is too delicate to be random
When you say "scientists", do you mean people like Kent Hovind etc?
You can't prove the existens of God with science!
Gods and divinity is something man created, because we didn't know any better! When you don't understand something you want to explains things with divine beings. That is why we have religion today.
@doriamedina tbh I think that the idea that this whole universe is a random occurance is rediculous, something cannot be created from nothing, that is basic physics, so in a way physics taught to 10 year olds dismisses athiesm
@doriamedina then how come only 2.3% of the world describes itself as athiest? are you saying that only 2.3% of 6 billion people have a brain? truth it, albert einstien beleived in God, stepehen hawking says there is a bigger chance of there being a god than not, are you going to dispute with them? oh and stalin and hitler were athiests just so you know
People need something spiritual in their lives, that is why we have religion!
This is what Einstein wrote in a letter about God before his death:
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still purely primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this."
By the way Hitler was a Roman Catholic not atheist!
@doriamedina no he didnt, and hitler was athiest, just live and let live please, I hate dogmatic athiests, if you were one of those athiests that was like "I personally dont believe in God, but I wont look down on those who do because its their opinion and nobody knows who is right or wrong" then I would have no problem with you
@IndianaJoel93 Hitler would have been an odd Atheist, to have "Gott Mit Uns" (God With Us) inscribed on every Nazi belt-buckle! You are telling stories against Atheists NOT because they are true, but because these are the bars to your religious prison, keeping you from realizing the prison-door is unlocked, that religion is all in your mind, and you can just push back the door and walk out any time.
@Dracopol he still tried to exterminate religion, and I am not in a religious prison, if anything believing in God makes me free, because if I was an athiest I would feel trapped in a meaningless existance, believing that a divine entity/cosmological singularity/God is watching over me makes me feel free to enjoy sport, music, movies, TV and gives me a purpose in life to do well in school, get a good job, a hot wife and kids.
@IndianaJoel93 Again you are caught in a prison of demeaning beliefs against Atheism, even though more devout religious people than you have quit and can lead by example. Beware of witch-doctors giving you a false sense of purpose, because they manipulate you for THEIR purposes. The answer to such puerile arguments against freedom from religion have been amply defeated on atheism(dot)about(dot)com and fool no one.
@Dracopol witch doctors? oh shut up man, I could say you were in a prison of demeaning beliefs against Religion, btw I read that website and I think it is retarded and it doesnt convince me one tiny bit.
@IndianaJoel93 Religion is something unnecessary and dangerous in our society, it only leads to flying planes into buildings or drinking the cyanide Kool-Aid. We know about these things now, there are no leaders able to stifle news and information against religion.
@IndianaJoel93 you might take in account that not everyone who isn't atheist necessarily obbeys a religion. there are people who believe in destiny, power of trees and similar stuff, because people have to have something to believe in. also, to join in the science/religion thing, both are ways to make us understand how space, eart, and life originated, and to tell us what's behind earthquakes, heavy rains, strong winds and storms, hurricanes, sandstorms, tsunami, vulcanic activity and what ever
@stuchly1 else. but there is one big difference between the two. religion is fixed, based on unchangable (and in so many points false) statements and gives no option that it could not be true. the only good thing about religion is that it was the thing that made the people follow some laws and made them scared of doimg immoral things. science is the other side of the same coin. it changes with the invention of new technologies, and science is aware of the possibility of being now, but there is
@stuchly1 still a chance to find out a more accurate answer and further refine it in the future. i completely agree that man created science, as well as religion, but man did not create evolution. on the other side, religion is completely man-made, including the miraculous creation. wouldn't that be cool if there was a half transparent bearded guy who was lazying around in the middle of big nothing and one day said, holy sh... that's boring, let's create space, sun, moon and earth! and let's...
@stuchly1 create multiple plants and animals to live on the planet, and then human to be above them all. it's all because people wanted to believe that their are the best, the chosen ones and stuff?
religion is irational, while science is rational. science is based on what we know from real life, not on something that somebody created to make us believe in it. ;-) religion was created to make people believe in your thing. you know? you can create your own religion and you will maybe find a
@stuchly1 but i don't mind theists, it's amazing what kind of architectonic wonders people did for god, amazing buildings even now, when we have much better technology than back then. also, when religious people don't mind that i'm an atheist, why should i mind somebody religious? it depends on everyone, we have wonderful things like democracy and liberty... =)
@doriamedina what about the Cosmological Singularity? which most physisists believe is "God", a divine entity that has control over the laws of physics, it is only obsessive biologists that are athiests, and unfortunatly, being a religious person who loves animals and evolution, I cant really find anyone who has my level of knowledge and is not a dogmatic athiest, they are all like you.
@IndianaJoel93 Most physicist DO NOT accept the Cosmological singularity! That whole theory have so many fallacies which have already been debunked many times! For me to completely explain the flaws will take too much time and space on this comments page! But I can give you some good links, so you can read about it, if you are interested?
@IndianaJoel93 Most scientists?! How do you know that? Please do not make strawman claims, that is so typical for creationists and religious apologists! Personal beliefs are not evidence for the exitstence of "God"! If you claim that Gods existence can be proven by science, you must first be able to scientifically demonstrate to others that such a being exists before you can make such a claim. No one has yet done that throughout history!
@doriamedina it is a statistic that 75% of scientists believe in some sort of God, even Stephen Hawking said that the universe is so finely balenced and complicated that you cannot dismiss the theory of God
@IndianaJoel93 Sigh. Read SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN issue of January 2010. The laws of nature can be completely different things yet life will have a chance to form and develop, even in a universe of neutrons and sigma-minus particles.
@IndianaJoel93 Define "so many" scientists. You don't sound like you've had any education so you can't speak for scientists. There is no such thing as a "balance" of the universe, in fact SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN of January 2010 showed that if laws of nature were very different, we wouldn't even have neutrons and protons in a univese but neutrons and sigma-minus particles, yet life would still have a chance to form and evolve!
@3fatkid The British are more consistent with sounds even when the parts of speech of a word change. They would use the long "ee" sound for the beginning of "evolution" because that's how it's said in the word "evolve". They also say conTROversy ("traw") because it's the same sound as in "controversial".
В будущем мой член будет развиваться, чтобы стать вертикально, когда климат становится горячей и полной.
URProductions 1 year ago
evolution is just a part of Gods great plan, but what is the meaning behind this plan?
great series, I have it on DVD :) the Torotons and those spitfire birds were my favorites, those squibbons were cute though :)
IndianaJoel93 2 years ago
@IndianaJoel93 there is no god.
billjesusgates 2 years ago
@billjesusgates how do you know? so many scientists say that there is a divine creator and mathemeticians have done equations and proved that the balance in the universe is too delicate to be random
IndianaJoel93 2 years ago
When you say "scientists", do you mean people like Kent Hovind etc?
You can't prove the existens of God with science!
Gods and divinity is something man created, because we didn't know any better! When you don't understand something you want to explains things with divine beings. That is why we have religion today.
doriamedina 2 years ago
@doriamedina tbh I think that the idea that this whole universe is a random occurance is rediculous, something cannot be created from nothing, that is basic physics, so in a way physics taught to 10 year olds dismisses athiesm
IndianaJoel93 2 years ago
So who created God? "Something cannot be created from nothing" - you're own words!
Atheism is a non-belief in Gods. Today God is irrelevant, because we know better from science!
If you wish to believe in a God that is you're own business. But please do not explain the existens of God with science! You will only be laughed at!
doriamedina 2 years ago
@doriamedina who or what created science?
IndianaJoel93 2 years ago
Science is a label! We humans use our brain and go out in the world and find facts which are then critically examined by other humans who have brains.
We don't take our information from a fictional book and base it as evidence!
To answer your question simple - Science, like religion and Gods are made by man!
At least keep you discussion above kindergarten level, please!
doriamedina 2 years ago
@doriamedina then how come only 2.3% of the world describes itself as athiest? are you saying that only 2.3% of 6 billion people have a brain? truth it, albert einstien beleived in God, stepehen hawking says there is a bigger chance of there being a god than not, are you going to dispute with them? oh and stalin and hitler were athiests just so you know
IndianaJoel93 2 years ago
People need something spiritual in their lives, that is why we have religion!
This is what Einstein wrote in a letter about God before his death:
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still purely primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this."
By the way Hitler was a Roman Catholic not atheist!
doriamedina 2 years ago
@doriamedina no he didnt, and hitler was athiest, just live and let live please, I hate dogmatic athiests, if you were one of those athiests that was like "I personally dont believe in God, but I wont look down on those who do because its their opinion and nobody knows who is right or wrong" then I would have no problem with you
IndianaJoel93 2 years ago
Are you serious? Read the letter which he wrote on the link I sent you! And find out for yourself!
Hitler was a catholic! That is a fact wether you like it or not! Although that is completely irrelevant to this discussion!
All believers have one thing in common!
They don't care about facts! So this discussion is pretty much a non-discussion!
doriamedina 2 years ago
I respect peoples belief in whatever they want to believe! That is called tolerance, something believers have alot to learn about!
Just do not try and prove God with science! It's a futile attempt!
doriamedina 2 years ago
@IndianaJoel93 Hitler would have been an odd Atheist, to have "Gott Mit Uns" (God With Us) inscribed on every Nazi belt-buckle! You are telling stories against Atheists NOT because they are true, but because these are the bars to your religious prison, keeping you from realizing the prison-door is unlocked, that religion is all in your mind, and you can just push back the door and walk out any time.
Dracopol 1 year ago
@Dracopol he still tried to exterminate religion, and I am not in a religious prison, if anything believing in God makes me free, because if I was an athiest I would feel trapped in a meaningless existance, believing that a divine entity/cosmological singularity/God is watching over me makes me feel free to enjoy sport, music, movies, TV and gives me a purpose in life to do well in school, get a good job, a hot wife and kids.
IndianaJoel93 1 year ago
@IndianaJoel93 Again you are caught in a prison of demeaning beliefs against Atheism, even though more devout religious people than you have quit and can lead by example. Beware of witch-doctors giving you a false sense of purpose, because they manipulate you for THEIR purposes. The answer to such puerile arguments against freedom from religion have been amply defeated on atheism(dot)about(dot)com and fool no one.
Dracopol 1 year ago
@Dracopol witch doctors? oh shut up man, I could say you were in a prison of demeaning beliefs against Religion, btw I read that website and I think it is retarded and it doesnt convince me one tiny bit.
IndianaJoel93 1 year ago
@IndianaJoel93 Religion is something unnecessary and dangerous in our society, it only leads to flying planes into buildings or drinking the cyanide Kool-Aid. We know about these things now, there are no leaders able to stifle news and information against religion.
Dracopol 1 year ago
@IndianaJoel93 you might take in account that not everyone who isn't atheist necessarily obbeys a religion. there are people who believe in destiny, power of trees and similar stuff, because people have to have something to believe in. also, to join in the science/religion thing, both are ways to make us understand how space, eart, and life originated, and to tell us what's behind earthquakes, heavy rains, strong winds and storms, hurricanes, sandstorms, tsunami, vulcanic activity and what ever
stuchly1 1 year ago
@stuchly1 if only more athiests were like you, then we would all get along
IndianaJoel93 1 year ago
@stuchly1 else. but there is one big difference between the two. religion is fixed, based on unchangable (and in so many points false) statements and gives no option that it could not be true. the only good thing about religion is that it was the thing that made the people follow some laws and made them scared of doimg immoral things. science is the other side of the same coin. it changes with the invention of new technologies, and science is aware of the possibility of being now, but there is
stuchly1 1 year ago
@stuchly1 still a chance to find out a more accurate answer and further refine it in the future. i completely agree that man created science, as well as religion, but man did not create evolution. on the other side, religion is completely man-made, including the miraculous creation. wouldn't that be cool if there was a half transparent bearded guy who was lazying around in the middle of big nothing and one day said, holy sh... that's boring, let's create space, sun, moon and earth! and let's...
stuchly1 1 year ago
@stuchly1 create multiple plants and animals to live on the planet, and then human to be above them all. it's all because people wanted to believe that their are the best, the chosen ones and stuff?
religion is irational, while science is rational. science is based on what we know from real life, not on something that somebody created to make us believe in it. ;-) religion was created to make people believe in your thing. you know? you can create your own religion and you will maybe find a
stuchly1 1 year ago
@stuchly1 bunch of followers and your religion won't be any worse than christianity or islam, but you can¨t create your own science ;-)
stuchly1 1 year ago
@stuchly1 but i don't mind theists, it's amazing what kind of architectonic wonders people did for god, amazing buildings even now, when we have much better technology than back then. also, when religious people don't mind that i'm an atheist, why should i mind somebody religious? it depends on everyone, we have wonderful things like democracy and liberty... =)
stuchly1 1 year ago
@doriamedina what about the Cosmological Singularity? which most physisists believe is "God", a divine entity that has control over the laws of physics, it is only obsessive biologists that are athiests, and unfortunatly, being a religious person who loves animals and evolution, I cant really find anyone who has my level of knowledge and is not a dogmatic athiest, they are all like you.
IndianaJoel93 1 year ago
@IndianaJoel93 Most physicist DO NOT accept the Cosmological singularity! That whole theory have so many fallacies which have already been debunked many times! For me to completely explain the flaws will take too much time and space on this comments page! But I can give you some good links, so you can read about it, if you are interested?
doriamedina 1 year ago
@doriamedina but they actually do, and by the way, the majority of scientists do believe in God
IndianaJoel93 1 year ago
@IndianaJoel93 Most scientists?! How do you know that? Please do not make strawman claims, that is so typical for creationists and religious apologists! Personal beliefs are not evidence for the exitstence of "God"! If you claim that Gods existence can be proven by science, you must first be able to scientifically demonstrate to others that such a being exists before you can make such a claim. No one has yet done that throughout history!
doriamedina 1 year ago
@doriamedina it is a statistic that 75% of scientists believe in some sort of God, even Stephen Hawking said that the universe is so finely balenced and complicated that you cannot dismiss the theory of God
IndianaJoel93 1 year ago
@IndianaJoel93 Sigh. Read SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN issue of January 2010. The laws of nature can be completely different things yet life will have a chance to form and develop, even in a universe of neutrons and sigma-minus particles.
Dracopol 1 year ago
@doriamedina and can you prove that?
stocktonmiller110 1 year ago
@stocktonmiller110
Prove what?
doriamedina 1 year ago
@doriamedina they're enoying christians, get over it.
BeamSurfer 1 year ago
@doriamedina people dont understand death so they came up with god
swastikaPOWER 1 year ago
@IndianaJoel93 Define "so many" scientists. You don't sound like you've had any education so you can't speak for scientists. There is no such thing as a "balance" of the universe, in fact SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN of January 2010 showed that if laws of nature were very different, we wouldn't even have neutrons and protons in a univese but neutrons and sigma-minus particles, yet life would still have a chance to form and evolve!
Dracopol 1 year ago
omg abraham lincoin is a alive
FreecapZ 2 years ago
personally i think reptiles will make a comeback due the hot climate :D
iadoremanga 2 years ago 5
@iadoremanga that won't be so exciting, i think they wanted to show that evolution can push organisms to extreme. ;-)
stuchly1 1 year ago
this series is cool. it's a 9,000 out of 10 on creativity
bestmand902 2 years ago 2
isn't this guy using the wrong E sound for evolution i mean i know it's a different dialect but still
3fatkid 3 years ago
@3fatkid The British are more consistent with sounds even when the parts of speech of a word change. They would use the long "ee" sound for the beginning of "evolution" because that's how it's said in the word "evolve". They also say conTROversy ("traw") because it's the same sound as in "controversial".
Dracopol 1 year ago
¡Noooooooooooo!
Why withdrew all the episodes in Spanish?
srqtihdp616 3 years ago
Not spanish
hotcurlyfriesondeck 3 years ago