Added: 4 years ago
From: seastarwatcher
Views: 13,516
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • He is very fragile and insignificant as an individual, if not for his talks. no one would pay attention to him otherwise. it's interesting, and he knows it. i am just pointing out.

  • He is me . All of you are myself. We are one Being , one light- awareness. I AM ... DJUST SAY I AM. DONT SAY I´M GOD, I´M THIS OR THAT. DJUST I AM AND SEE YOUR BODY AS LIGHT.

  • vinrama1974 and tahimsa, wow go into it without prejudgements as he said, he is only the speaker. He asks no one to follow, he wished for no followers. He simply reached out for understanding and himself gives this long after his time of form has ended. To say; i don't know something is the most empowering statement on this planet. When married to; I now commit my total being to finding out, there you go and human revolution, mutating the total intelligence of who we truly are.  Mauri Ora!

  • i have no prejudgement.....i do see irony however in a man that rejected gurus to be followed as if one by so many. my guess is that he must have been at odds with his position. I constantly say "i don't know" but one thing i do know is that another person's understanding cannot be my simply by accepting......I must question what i hear and see from anyone (JK included). My guess is that he would agree as well.

    peace

  • @mereanataki where are you on this journey now? i am very intrigue with your declaration on this commitment. i wish to live life as he talks about too.

  • As K says "truth" can only be found by searching/questioning YOURself. So to sit here and listen to him is really ironic and a waste of time. you see you/we are listeing to a man that has told us (and I already knew this) that you need to listen to yourself, not some guru if you really wish to understand life,love, truth. His experiences are not mine, so he is not really sharing much of value to me. I like to listen to him, but I don't worry too much about understanding him. I must understand me

  • You missed the whole point. Watch again in silence.

  • I think he described it pretty eloquently

  • because we disagree does not mean that either one of us missed the point. we are one, but we are also two.

  • talking the pure knowledge is very very interesting ?!! as he said word is not the fact , but what to do good heart, my concusions are disturbing me.thanks for tis video

  • That's a good sign!

  • i thank u seastarwatcher for posting it.

  • hi seastarwatcher - your name is good do you really gaze the stars from the sea.What influence has JK brought to your life, it is very difficult to follow his teachings for simple people and i find him very rude and angry at times during the discourse, the vedios are a treasure though and appreciate for putting them online

  • Hi Vinrama1974,

    I like the name seastarwatcher because the sea and the stars are mysterious and beautiful. I went to see K in the early 80's and have always found his teachings to be direct and free of any distractions. I think his rudeness/anger at his last talks were a result of his age, health and frustration at not being understood. I will try to post more vids in near future.

    Regards, Andrew (seastarwatcher).

  • Vinrama, I dispute your claim that his claims are difficult to follow for simple people. Could you try to find some examples to prove what you're saying. Thanks. Also, please explain what anger is. Anger is related to rudeness so that will help me understand what you mean.

  • I think that he is not concerned about how he comes off, he is only being honest.

    The anger you see is the result of your own delusions, to put it bluntly.

    (I see what you are talking about too. But I am also flawed, like you)

  • also at about :14... its not like they were broadcasting on a loudspeaker...

    people starte to turn around to see k walking in to speak.

  • :17 what is he doing

  • it;s not important really but he speaks as if this is a continuation of the other talks you had said were 1985.

    thank u for sharing these.

  • the first talk was on 28th December 1985 and this is on 1st January 1986, so there are only 3 days in between. It really is a continuation.

  • :) ohhh. :)

  • it's funny i saw your channel today...and watched your subliminal ad video...

    but i cant remember how i came to your channel.

    funnhy.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more