Have you guys heard that NASA have declared The so-called Apollo landing sites, for no fly zone ? man you got to be kidding, you Moon landers are laughable, totally pathetic.
No it doesn't. David Percy is a proven liar, and if you're going to endorse his claims you're a liar too. The "jump salute" video that he shows wasn't sped up enough. Jarrah White then made the same "mistake" as Percy, i.e. playing the footage at 150% speed to get it to double the original speed. Of course, landing believers aren't retards like the liars Percy and JW, so the mistake was quickly spotted and JW was ridiculed for it long afterwards.
@Aeronauticalexplorer no its not a lie, with almost any high powered space telescope you can see the landing spot, look for hobble and moon landing spot photos, just because people think its not true doesn't mean its not true
@krisdevalle Do you see any drawbacks in the Mythbusters demonstration Kris? I would just like to see the flip side of this coin. You mention over and over again how Jarrah White used his bedroom to show how lunar simulant collapses in on itself whenever he takes a step into the soil, but what do you think about the Mythbusters' demonstration? Are there any flaws there?
@krisdevalle It is supposed to simulate the Moon sand, genius. NASA sells it. Why don't they sell the real shit if they really shoveled 800lbs of it in their "space ship"? Where the fuck is it all?
@krisdevalle Yes it does. Jarrah White wasted 300$ on fake moon sand and Mythbusters conducted their experiment in falsehood with a predetermined outcome. Both in Earth's gravity. So what do they prove? Nothing. But what is notable is that there are such vivid footprints in the NASA photos but in the videos they collapse just like Jarrah White's did. More over, they were able to make footprints but nothing from the exahust gas blowing gas onto the loose moon sand. That just does not add up.
@krisdevalle You obviously don't understand my comment. I said the Mythbusters experiment was a predetermined outcome and Jarrah White wasted $300 on the fake moon sand sold to him by NASA and that both experiments prove Nothing. So you are not making any sense. A usual occurrence.
I guess we should simply use the rest of the evidence that supports the lunar landings. You know, photos, film, Soviet deep space tracking, pro and amateer astronomer photos and witnessing, eyewitnesss viewing the Saturn launches, interception of radio communications, geologists worldwide confirming moonrock, LRO pix, Kaguya images, et cetera.
@krisdevalle But we went over all of that already recently. You act like we never did. Soviet deep space tracking is a lie. They could't even track their own craft. They relied on a NASA network etc. There is no evidence whatsoever to support the NASA moonlandigs claim.
@krisdevalle They relied on Jodrell Bank which is a NASA and British network to track their craft because they had not the capabilities. This is well known outside of the moonlandings argument. So to say that the USSR Soviets Russians tracked Apollo to the Moon is a Bald Face LIE!
Jodrell tracked a few of the Soviet probes, sure. But not FOR the USSR.
I was just googling for the information, and you're just confused.
Good try though. However, as I maintain, if you wish to prove that Jodrell Bank tracked the Soviet probes because there was no Soviet deep space tracking, then supply a link.
Can't be that hard? I mean, if you're so right! Unless... unless... you're wrong?
@krisdevalle Okay Kris, let's talk about the JSC-1? It was manufactured in 94 to approximate the chemical, mechanical, and engineering properties of lunar dust. It is a basaltic ash with a high glass content. What does this prove? That NASA had to have gone all the way to the moon to replicate lunar soil here on earth? That's probably what they want people to think after manufacturing this product. The MLS-1 was an earlier lunar soil made from basaltic rock.
In a letter to Dryden dated 23 July 1963, Lovell described his visit: During this time I was taken to the major Soviet optical and radio observatories and to the deep space tracking network, a station which has not so far been seen by Western eyes
@krisdevalle Either way, both simulants were manufactured differently. This leads me to believe that we don’t know what real lunar soil is because we don’t have any here on earth because no human ever went to the moon to get any. Simple stuff Kris!
@krisdevalle In any case, Jarrah White used the JSC-1 to do an experiment where he took one giant leap for mankind into the soil and very sadly could not replicate the footprint that the famous Buzzy Aldrin had made way, way back in the days of yore. I am convinced that the moon landing did not happen Kris. No one wants to believe it's fake, but it is and the truth will unfold in the future. Certainly not any time soon Kris because we are not ready to explore the moon surface yet.
@krisdevalle Consider these two possibilities Kris. First, NASA never went to the moon and therefore the lunar stimulant has no relevance to real lunar soil in terms of its chemical and mineral properties. Second, NASA sends Jarrah White what they call a "JSC-1 simulant" which in any case could not replicate the Buzz Aldrin footprint because the dust collapses in on itself. Both events conclude no moon landing Kris. Not hard to figure out?
Heh, nameofthepenis also doesn't. You'll have to get used to the idea that he does. And he makes money off of tards like you that buy into his bullshit. Those $300 he just earned selling lies around, like all the other propagandists, like Percy, Sibrel, Jack white, the late Kaysing and Rene and so on and so forth. Open your eyes.
@GeneralSamov Well, I am sure you're not bad yourself either Sunshine! :) I am sure you're not as handsome as Kris though! He's hard to beat I'm afraid especially with that cute little hat!
And let's not even lose time on the "wire reflections" Percy seems so sure he's seeing. Probably as much as CornFlakes believes he's seeing frogs (that is not at all, in case you're wondering). The first reflection is obviously lens flare, as otherwise the "wire" would be going upwards diagonally, as opposed to how wire support should go, straight up vertically. The second one is even more laughable, as it's obviously damaged film (irregular shape).
What is clear is you're a retarded liar. take a screenshot an draw a line from the astronaut's back of the head and through the reflection. It's inclined at least 10 degrees clockwise. I took a screenshot myself and drew the lines, and I still got it on my computer. I might even host it on tinypic or something, but then again, what's the use. Thick skulls don't go hand in hand with clarity of vision, objectivity and impartiality.
@GeneralSamov 10 degrees is not much. Wire rigs can go way more than that. There is tension on the wire cables. I have used rigs similar to what NASA used. They don't have to be perfectly vertical at all times. When they are pulled in one direction they will go diagonal until it slides on the track to catch up. You are not mechanically inclined.. so whats the use. You are also too dumb to understand anything that requires a tiny bit of intelligence.
@Aeronauticalexplorer Good answer! It's not as if any of your chaps have ever demonstrated a wit sharp enough to cut butter, or to have me run to a dictionary.
Often, I feel as if I am on the viewing platform for the primate house in the zoo. Amusing watching them strive to be human.
You need to improve your vocabulary. It takes a small mind to address people in the manner you have . Of course I wouldn't expect anything more from a gov't believer. Bet you think 19 Arabs hi-jacked those 911 planes huh? Anyone with a 1st grade education could see through all these lies, maybe you'll get there someday but I doubt it. Keep believing the gov't conspiracy and the 3 bears. Later hasapah.
@Rubidious03 Were they paranoid when they didn't believe the Gulf of Tonkin incident was a lie? It was declassified that the government lied. So that is an admission of guilt. But people like you don't even care or too dumb to even know about it.
Back in the 70's I had a cabin up at Cold Creek NV. We would go to Indian Springs for supplies at times. Just past the CC turn off was a military installation on the Nevada Test Site. In the enclosure you could see replicas of the moon vehicles. Puts a question mark on that phase of the moon landings.
@Aeronauticalexplorer or on a beach to make footprints with so much definition. You would definitely need a lot of moisture to make the famous Buzzy Aldrin footprints.
(sigh) Still educating folks in English; a never-ending task, apparently.
Scare quotes are quotation marks placed around a word or phrase to indicate that it does not signify its literal or conventional meaning. - Wiki, Scare Quotes
Quotation marks can also be used to indicate a different meaning of a word or phrase than the one typically associated with it and are often used to express irony. - Wiki, Quotation Mark
@krisdevalle Either way, the product was manufactured from NASA themselves and they sent it to Jarrah to do a demonstration. Jarrah proved that no footprint could have been created using that product and therefore, NASA never went to the moon. Simple stuff Kris!
Hmm... indeed! Flawless logic. Kind of like when you need to go to the nearby village you will obviously choose to go by plane. Apart from the fact you'll first need to travel to the airport (which is probably farther away than the village), then fly to another airport (God only knows where that one is), and then get from the second airport to the village you set out to go to. Indeed, the logic behind is impeccable. Impeccable as in retarded.
Hey lander fucktards. The moon mission's were giant failures.. Suck it up like at least a one nut man would do.. But the good news is that you get another chance by voting for Newt!!! He's going to get a city going on up there. Shit hot damn!!!!!
I always wanted to believe that NASA went to the moon, but they didn't and that's too bad! Why wouldn't anyone really want to believe that NASA went the moon? That's not what this forum is about and that's what I try to address. Why not question its reality? These shills get so worked up when anyone shows any disbelief or when an experiment shows any little bit of proof toward a hoax, the shills get so personal like they have something to hide?
@nameofthepen What makes it rather amusing is that you feel that he used accurate lunar simulant to prove NASA never went to the moon, thus rendering the lunar simulant inaccurate.
So if they never went, what is the simulant simulating?
None of you turkeys seem to be able to answer that simple question.
You're now posing questions to yourself and answering your own questions on the air? Are you absolutely certain you're not starting to develop schizophrenia?
It's too predictable of a video from my point of view. If these men really travelled all the way to the moon, you would certainly think they would be worried or would show some uncertainty in their voices. They didn't because they had nothing to worry about. Wink Wink! :)
So they spent billions of dollars (and even if you believe its fake they spent billions of dollars making the saturn V's etc) but because the people behind the "Hoax" neglected to tell these actors to sound worried, that's proof that it's faked.
I've never noticed any astronaut's sounding worried as it happens... I suppose the international space station is also fake because the astronauts on it don't sound worried either....
@paulosio Watch the Jarrah White video that shows how Aldrin's footprints were not possible to make! That's not too hard to watch even for you. If you can't understand it, I can explain it to you and to Kris. You both seem a little slow!
@mrwonderfulman2011 "Watch the Jarrah White video that shows how Aldrin's footprints were not possible to make"
It is interesting that nobody seems to ask about the effects of 1/6th G on footprints. On earth, the angle of repose of a hill is determined in part by 1G. On the moon, that angle would be a lot steeper. The only way to really put the footprints to the test would be to do the "vomit comet" thing with an aircraft.
@knowledgemonger Thats a good argument. First one I ever seen from a stupid NASA backer like you. Maybe it collapses because it is heavier.
Problem I have with the foot prints is that they are in the pictures but nothing from the rocket engine exhaust. How can there be foot prints and nothing from the exhaust hitting the ground? Not even a tiny mark from it. pfffftt!
@Aeronauticalexplorer You mean, apart from all the "sweeping marks" in the lunar dust? Yeah, apart from that, not much. But seriously, haven't we gone through all of this already?
@GeneralSamov If it wasn't for repeating things that already have been debunked, the "we never went to the moon" folks wouldn't have anything to say. They bang on about stars that should not have been seen and the "shadows at angles" effect and wild made up nonsense about radiation and physics that only works in SiFi movies because that is all they have.
@knowledgemonger You forgot about the astroNots falling at a lower rate of speed than objects not hooked up to wire supports. That ruins the whole moonlandings claim. Exposes the NASA bull shit lie.
@paulosio You have no brain. If you did you would know buy now that the International Space Station is only 150 miles off the ground. The Moon is way out 230,000 Miles AWAY!!! lol Do you have any understanding of the difference?
@paulosio Yes. I have heard recordings of test pilots saying that they had a problem and were punching out. They don't sound worried. They report the situation quickly and clearly. It is the result of having to talk a lot while being worried about the aircraft holding together. The Apollo crews were test pilots. When things went wrong on Apollo 13 they reported it just like any test pilot will. There was a lot of heart warming stuff from Russia at that time.
If you just forget the whole space race and all this hoax nonsense and just see it as a couple human beings on the moon, it sends shivers down my spine to think they were the only people on it at that time and now it has been left empty for years and years. I wish I could go there one day..
I now expect one of the tards to come up and say Neil's mistake was intentional, so that when the hoaxtards would eventually crawl out from under their rocks and claim it was faked NASA could say just what you did, "why did we not re-shoot it then?"
@GeneralSamov You're right - I was half expecting that reply. Of course, there's no convincing 'em. If you could fly them up there and show them the landing sites they would just say "well, obviously NASA put all this stuff up here recently". Then if you got them to look down a microscope and show that the amount of micrometeorite impacts on the equipment was consistent with 40+ years on the lunar surface they would say NASA somehow faked that too.
@TheBaldmeister What do you base you belief on that anyone would say that? You are just making shit up now. You got nothing. There is just no way around all the evidence that they never walked on the Moon. Its a fact of life.
@krisdevalle Every single Physicist on the planet agrees with me that objects fall at the same rate of speed regardless of weight. Especially if on the Moon where there is no air. The astroNots fall at a much slower rate of speed than any other object in all of the NASA videos proving they are on wire supports as an attempt to simulate the 1:6 G. A Failed attempt at that. They faked it. It is clear as day.
@Aeronauticalexplorer You constantly make the false claim that the sand falls faster. Anyone who cares to can view the video frame by frame and see that this is simply false. The sand merely goes upwards more slowly than the person, comes back down more slowly and thus spends less time in the air. It is just like a person jumped 1 foot high while another jumped two feet high. They will spend different time in the air. This is exactly what we see in the video.
@knowledgemonger Bull shit. If you go frame by frame you can see some sand is even higher than the astroNot and it falls and hits the floor while he is still up off the floor 12 inches. Total proof that you are an idiot liar and that they were on the wire supports. You FAIL
@TheBaldmeister You know something; I really question the moon landing for many reasons. I also wonder a lot about the preparation of the dialogue too. It's as if the astronauts had a script planned before they left the planet. I mean, there was nothing strange about their voices from the time they stepped on to the moon "One small step for man ..." from the time they departed "What a ride, what a ride." In my opinion, the script was planned well ahead. Drama at its best! :)
@mrwonderfulman2011 After questioning the validity of the NASA claim and researching and examining all the evidence against them, anyone with any common sense can see that they whole thing was Bull Shit.
@Aeronauticalexplorer If you watch that Jarrah White video about making footprints in the lunar soil, he completely deflates the Mythbusters demo and shows how they're a bunch of idiots that are in bed with NASA and manipulate an experiment to the point where they find the results they were hoping to find. They can't even do any experiment properly whereas White shows how moisture would be needed otherwise the dust collapses in on itself. The Buzz Aldrin little boy footprint is a complete joke!
@mrwonderfulman2011 I know. The Mythbusters always have a predetermind outcome with the NASA experiments. Did you see the one they did with the Wire support and slow motion video? They called it "Busted" but never did the slow motion with the wire support On. The did them seperate. So Jarrah White took the video of the Mythbuster Jamie on the wire and Slowed it down and PRESTO instant NASA video Astronot jump. Exactly the same as the NASA video. Slow Motion AND the wire support is what NASA used
@krisdevalle So your theory is that if don't see it, it is not there? You crack me up with your stupidity. You remind be of a dumb blonde headed bimbo. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@mrwonderfulman2011 "the script was planned well ahead. Drama at its best!" - Well, yes, obviously they did think ahead about what they would say at key moments. As I said, Neil Armstrong planned to say "One small step for A man" but missed out the "a".
Just knowing that we are little beings on a large ball floating in an unimaginably vast space makes me wonder why everything is the way it is. That is when I found a website called Truth Contest. You can search it in google and click on the top result. Then read "The Present" on the homepage.
Have you guys heard that NASA have declared The so-called Apollo landing sites, for no fly zone ? man you got to be kidding, you Moon landers are laughable, totally pathetic.
kennjohnsen 1 hour ago
how come in this video we can see through the astronaut?
nikzad92 5 hours ago
@nikzad92 - Because he's really just a figment of our imaginations. ;-)
nameofthepen 4 hours ago
@nikzad92
Because it's fake.
NASACrooks 3 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Lol, I just saw the Jarrah White "philwebb59 is stalking me, omg oh noes!!11" video. So pathetic it's hilarious. What a farce...
GeneralSamov 5 hours ago
Comment removed
GeneralSamov 5 hours ago
Anyone who says the Russians Tracked NASA all the way to the Moon is a LIAR.
Aeronauticalexplorer 6 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer Here's some more:
Soviet Deep-Space Communication Centers
In 1959, work began on a massive facility designed to communicate with spacecraft sent to Mars and Venus.
and the link:
ww w. mentallandscape. com/V_Telemetry. htm
krisdevalle 6 hours ago
Ha ha...the famous "Apollo Lens Flare Excuse". A classic.
Sometimes it looks like wires, and sometimes, it looks like frogs. :D
nameofthepen 9 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Aeronauticalexplorer
No it doesn't. David Percy is a proven liar, and if you're going to endorse his claims you're a liar too. The "jump salute" video that he shows wasn't sped up enough. Jarrah White then made the same "mistake" as Percy, i.e. playing the footage at 150% speed to get it to double the original speed. Of course, landing believers aren't retards like the liars Percy and JW, so the mistake was quickly spotted and JW was ridiculed for it long afterwards.
GeneralSamov 9 hours ago
moon landing? i dont belive this shit!
CLICk000000000000 10 hours ago
@CLICk000000000000 lol! Me neither.
Aeronauticalexplorer 9 hours ago
One lie from man, that a lot of people still believe
2thinkabout 10 hours ago
@2thinkabout The number of people whom still believe it is shrinking due to examination of the evidence.
Aeronauticalexplorer 10 hours ago
I was photographing the sorta corolla and I saw no stars.
NASACrooks 11 hours ago
@NASACrooks - but did you manage to get some real REGOLITH???
nameofthepen 11 hours ago
@nameofthepen
No regolith. I only got some cornercubes sporadically here and there .The rest was sorda corolla and jump saluting.
NASACrooks 10 hours ago
@NASACrooks - Well, fail! We'll have to send you back again.
But, don't worry - we've *almost* got it down pat by now.
nameofthepen 9 hours ago
They never walked on the Moon. Just videos recorded on Earth and a lie.
Aeronauticalexplorer 14 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer no its not a lie, with almost any high powered space telescope you can see the landing spot, look for hobble and moon landing spot photos, just because people think its not true doesn't mean its not true
cooljwj 13 hours ago
@cooljwj - And, just because people think it's true doesn't mean it's true.
nameofthepen 12 hours ago
@nameofthepen No, but the amount of evidence to support the reality of the moonlandings is.
Plus there is that odd consistency that people who believe in the hoax do not come from a scientific, engineering or academic background.
krisdevalle 12 hours ago
@krisdevalle Do you see any drawbacks in the Mythbusters demonstration Kris? I would just like to see the flip side of this coin. You mention over and over again how Jarrah White used his bedroom to show how lunar simulant collapses in on itself whenever he takes a step into the soil, but what do you think about the Mythbusters' demonstration? Are there any flaws there?
mrwonderfulman2011 12 hours ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 - You'll probably just be accused of being genetically unfit to receive an answer to this question.
That seems to be the week-end, skeleton-crew tactic.
nameofthepen 12 hours ago
@mrdreadfultard2011
And, just because tards think it's not true doesn't mean it's not true.
GeneralSamov 12 hours ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 You never answered my question sufficiently, or at all, really.
This is the one very, very important fact that none of your seem to want to, or be able to answer.
If NASA never went to the moon, then what is the lunar simulant simulating?
If you can answer this, then perhaps we can progress.
krisdevalle 11 hours ago
@krisdevalle It is supposed to simulate the Moon sand, genius. NASA sells it. Why don't they sell the real shit if they really shoveled 800lbs of it in their "space ship"? Where the fuck is it all?
Aeronauticalexplorer 10 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer How do they simulate the 'moon sand' if they never went there, as you say?
None of you seem to be able to get across that one. It's pretty funny.
krisdevalle 10 hours ago
@krisdevalle You need to look up the word -supposed- you illiterate fuck. LOL and you are an Aussie. English is your language so don't even try it.
I said its supposed to simulate the Moon sand. I didn't say it does idiot. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Aeronauticalexplorer 9 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer Oh. So I guess that makes the experiment worthless.
krisdevalle 9 hours ago
@krisdevalle Yes it does. Jarrah White wasted 300$ on fake moon sand and Mythbusters conducted their experiment in falsehood with a predetermined outcome. Both in Earth's gravity. So what do they prove? Nothing. But what is notable is that there are such vivid footprints in the NASA photos but in the videos they collapse just like Jarrah White's did. More over, they were able to make footprints but nothing from the exahust gas blowing gas onto the loose moon sand. That just does not add up.
Aeronauticalexplorer 8 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer You said 'I said its supposed to simulate the Moon sand. I didn't say it does'
So how would this experiment prove anything then?
Of course I am more inclined to believe comprehensive soil mechanic results from Surveyor:
ntrs. nasa. gov/archive/nasa/casi. ntrs. nasa. gov/19690027073_1969027073. pdf
Than you, fapping on about crap you don't understand.
krisdevalle 8 hours ago
@krisdevalle You obviously don't understand my comment. I said the Mythbusters experiment was a predetermined outcome and Jarrah White wasted $300 on the fake moon sand sold to him by NASA and that both experiments prove Nothing. So you are not making any sense. A usual occurrence.
Aeronauticalexplorer 8 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer Both experiments prove nothing?
Ok then.
I guess we should simply use the rest of the evidence that supports the lunar landings. You know, photos, film, Soviet deep space tracking, pro and amateer astronomer photos and witnessing, eyewitnesss viewing the Saturn launches, interception of radio communications, geologists worldwide confirming moonrock, LRO pix, Kaguya images, et cetera.
Whaddya got? Something something dust?
krisdevalle 8 hours ago
@krisdevalle But we went over all of that already recently. You act like we never did. Soviet deep space tracking is a lie. They could't even track their own craft. They relied on a NASA network etc. There is no evidence whatsoever to support the NASA moonlandigs claim.
Aeronauticalexplorer 8 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer Lying about things is not going to help.
As can be seen here:
ww w. russianspaceweb. com/kik. html
Deep space tracking was in place by 1962 to support their lunar exploration program.
Seriously - why should I take your word for it? It is clearly in error.
krisdevalle 8 hours ago
@krisdevalle Why should I believe your bias link? I go by facts not any bullshit website. Especially one from you. LOL
Aeronauticalexplorer 8 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer What facts?
You just made up some guff about the USSR relying on the NASA network.
what's your source?
krisdevalle 8 hours ago
@krisdevalle They relied on Jodrell Bank which is a NASA and British network to track their craft because they had not the capabilities. This is well known outside of the moonlandings argument. So to say that the USSR Soviets Russians tracked Apollo to the Moon is a Bald Face LIE!
Aeronauticalexplorer 6 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer What are your sources?
List them here.
To show you are not lying.
Because I know you are.
krisdevalle 6 hours ago
@krisdevalle Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics is my source. You are a LIAR
Aeronauticalexplorer 6 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer Oh I see, you have gotten mixed up.
Jodrell tracked a few of the Soviet probes, sure. But not FOR the USSR.
I was just googling for the information, and you're just confused.
Good try though. However, as I maintain, if you wish to prove that Jodrell Bank tracked the Soviet probes because there was no Soviet deep space tracking, then supply a link.
Can't be that hard? I mean, if you're so right! Unless... unless... you're wrong?
krisdevalle 6 hours ago
@krisdevalle Okay Kris, let's talk about the JSC-1? It was manufactured in 94 to approximate the chemical, mechanical, and engineering properties of lunar dust. It is a basaltic ash with a high glass content. What does this prove? That NASA had to have gone all the way to the moon to replicate lunar soil here on earth? That's probably what they want people to think after manufacturing this product. The MLS-1 was an earlier lunar soil made from basaltic rock.
mrwonderfulman2011 5 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer And another one:
In a letter to Dryden dated 23 July 1963, Lovell described his visit: During this time I was taken to the major Soviet optical and radio observatories and to the deep space tracking network, a station which has not so far been seen by Western eyes
the link:
/history. nasa. gov/SP-4209/ch2-4. htm
Still waiting on your proof.
krisdevalle 6 hours ago
@krisdevalle Either way, both simulants were manufactured differently. This leads me to believe that we don’t know what real lunar soil is because we don’t have any here on earth because no human ever went to the moon to get any. Simple stuff Kris!
mrwonderfulman2011 5 hours ago
@krisdevalle In any case, Jarrah White used the JSC-1 to do an experiment where he took one giant leap for mankind into the soil and very sadly could not replicate the footprint that the famous Buzzy Aldrin had made way, way back in the days of yore. I am convinced that the moon landing did not happen Kris. No one wants to believe it's fake, but it is and the truth will unfold in the future. Certainly not any time soon Kris because we are not ready to explore the moon surface yet.
mrwonderfulman2011 5 hours ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 So if the lunar simulant was not real lunar soil, how does this make the experiment accurate?
He used something unlike the lunar soil to prove you can't put a footprint in the lunar soil?
That simply does not make sense. Explain to me how that is a logical experiment?
krisdevalle 5 hours ago
@krisdevalle Consider these two possibilities Kris. First, NASA never went to the moon and therefore the lunar stimulant has no relevance to real lunar soil in terms of its chemical and mineral properties. Second, NASA sends Jarrah White what they call a "JSC-1 simulant" which in any case could not replicate the Buzz Aldrin footprint because the dust collapses in on itself. Both events conclude no moon landing Kris. Not hard to figure out?
mrwonderfulman2011 4 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer
He "wasted" 300 bucks? Think again. That was an expense. He clearly made more than enough in revenues from selling his merchandise. Economy 101.
GeneralSamov 6 hours ago
@GeneralSamov I didn't know Jarrah White sold merchandise. I still don't.lol
Aeronauticalexplorer 6 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer
Heh, nameofthepenis also doesn't. You'll have to get used to the idea that he does. And he makes money off of tards like you that buy into his bullshit. Those $300 he just earned selling lies around, like all the other propagandists, like Percy, Sibrel, Jack white, the late Kaysing and Rene and so on and so forth. Open your eyes.
GeneralSamov 5 hours ago
@GeneralSweetie - I don't think Jarrah sells merchandise.
Do you? (waggles eyebrows lasciviously)
nameofthepen 6 hours ago
@nameofthepenis
You're so cute. Pity you're also painfully wrong about 95% of the time. Like now.
GeneralSamov 5 hours ago
@GeneralSweetie - (waggle, waggle waggle) ;-)
nameofthepen 5 hours ago
@GeneralSamov Well, I am sure you're not bad yourself either Sunshine! :) I am sure you're not as handsome as Kris though! He's hard to beat I'm afraid especially with that cute little hat!
mrwonderfulman2011 4 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer
And let's not even lose time on the "wire reflections" Percy seems so sure he's seeing. Probably as much as CornFlakes believes he's seeing frogs (that is not at all, in case you're wondering). The first reflection is obviously lens flare, as otherwise the "wire" would be going upwards diagonally, as opposed to how wire support should go, straight up vertically. The second one is even more laughable, as it's obviously damaged film (irregular shape).
GeneralSamov 9 hours ago
@GeneralSamov So you are claiming it is diagonal when it is clearly vertical. Yawn zzzz
Aeronauticalexplorer 8 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer
What is clear is you're a retarded liar. take a screenshot an draw a line from the astronaut's back of the head and through the reflection. It's inclined at least 10 degrees clockwise. I took a screenshot myself and drew the lines, and I still got it on my computer. I might even host it on tinypic or something, but then again, what's the use. Thick skulls don't go hand in hand with clarity of vision, objectivity and impartiality.
GeneralSamov 6 hours ago
@GeneralSamov 10 degrees is not much. Wire rigs can go way more than that. There is tension on the wire cables. I have used rigs similar to what NASA used. They don't have to be perfectly vertical at all times. When they are pulled in one direction they will go diagonal until it slides on the track to catch up. You are not mechanically inclined.. so whats the use. You are also too dumb to understand anything that requires a tiny bit of intelligence.
Aeronauticalexplorer 6 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer - Ha haaaa....
Have you noticed a certain hatman here having a giant fail trying to play the same Cat-and-Mouse game which CNN911Fakes does so very, very well?
Oh, well...they say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. :D
nameofthepen 9 hours ago
@nameofthepen CNN destroys the hat boy every time.
Aeronauticalexplorer 8 hours ago
@nameofthepen Hey buddy, every time you talk about me, that's a win for me.
It means you're not dribbling shit about the moon landings and wasting your time on me.
Yay! Winning. Hey, say something about my hat. That's important!
krisdevalle 8 hours ago
@krisdevalle Um no kris. You are being made fun of you moron. lol!!
Aeronauticalexplorer 8 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer I'll let you know when something works.
krisdevalle 8 hours ago
@krisdevalle I won't hold my breath.
Aeronauticalexplorer 8 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer Good answer! It's not as if any of your chaps have ever demonstrated a wit sharp enough to cut butter, or to have me run to a dictionary.
Often, I feel as if I am on the viewing platform for the primate house in the zoo. Amusing watching them strive to be human.
krisdevalle 8 hours ago
@krisdevalle Thats a failed attempt at being funny. Keep your day job as a NASA shill.
Aeronauticalexplorer 8 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer sez "Keep your day job as a NASA shill." LMAO!!
nameofthepen 7 hours ago
@cooljwj I tried that. There is no proof of the Moonlandings whatsoever.
Aeronauticalexplorer 10 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer lmao youre joking right?
KelseyCordle143 11 hours ago
@KelseyCordle143 are you new? lol!!!!!!!!!
Aeronauticalexplorer 10 hours ago
Where's the rock spiders?
TheGhostface979 14 hours ago
an inspiration .....
marcelxandrosofficia 14 hours ago
I'm not here right now so cry me a river, build yourself a bridge, and GET OVER IT!!!
norjop 14 hours ago
one step for man one giant step for mankind ...... americans can always say the write thing ....goddamn americans ahaah great
uaintshitnigga 14 hours ago
He's that useless he couldn't organise a piss up in a brewery.
norjop 14 hours ago
Who asked you?
41mikmac 15 hours ago
I distrust liars, are you one?
41mikmac 15 hours ago
@41mikmac
Nope, are you one?
GeneralSamov 14 hours ago
Jarrah White is as much use as a one legged man at an ass kicking competition.
norjop 15 hours ago
fake n gay!!
gumgl 15 hours ago
The Silence: "You should kill us all on sight."
LeetGamingTV 16 hours ago
@LeetGamingTV .
So now we know why some mammals eat their children...
.
norjop 15 hours ago
From what Neil the retard Armstrong says,it appears from the"moon"you can take good photographs of the sorta corolla .
NASACrooks 17 hours ago
@NASACrooks - check out the new face on the "wires" vid.
From Australia. I think it's Son of Hatman! ;-))
nameofthepen 16 hours ago
Comment removed
NASACrooks 17 hours ago
Must be yours. Anyone that believes a lying gov't agent is not using all their mental facilities.
41mikmac 18 hours ago
@41mikmac
Anyone who distrusts science is an ignorant simpleton. Are you one?
GeneralSamov 18 hours ago
@GeneralSweetie - Anyone who calls the moon hoax "science" is one, too.
nameofthepen 17 hours ago
@nameofthepenis
Agreed. One that calls the landings a hoax is one, too.
GeneralSamov 16 hours ago
You need to improve your vocabulary. It takes a small mind to address people in the manner you have . Of course I wouldn't expect anything more from a gov't believer. Bet you think 19 Arabs hi-jacked those 911 planes huh? Anyone with a 1st grade education could see through all these lies, maybe you'll get there someday but I doubt it. Keep believing the gov't conspiracy and the 3 bears. Later hasapah.
41mikmac 22 hours ago
@41mikmac 911 was a false flag
Aeronauticalexplorer 21 hours ago
@41mikmac I think someone's a little paranoid if you ask me..
Rubidious03 19 hours ago
@Rubidious03 Were they paranoid when they didn't believe the Gulf of Tonkin incident was a lie? It was declassified that the government lied. So that is an admission of guilt. But people like you don't even care or too dumb to even know about it.
Aeronauticalexplorer 19 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer
The govt. is capable of lying, so that must mean they lie about everything![/sarcasm]
piplupsingularity 17 hours ago
you should kill us all on sight
skillmyster666 22 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The pictures of the americans holding their flag on the moon are a big fake just like a fantasy-film.
First Fake Moon landing 1969 with proof looking this video
Check the Flag in Second 20 and 27... and find the Mistake in the Video.
news778 23 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The pictures of the americans holding their flag on the moon are a big fake just like a fantasy-film.
First Fake Moon landing 1969 with proof looking this video
Check the Flag in Second 20 and 27... and find the Mistake in the Video.
news778 23 hours ago
IS IT JUST ME ARE R THESE Niggass SEE TRUUUU
NiallVincentBrady 1 day ago
Back in the 70's I had a cabin up at Cold Creek NV. We would go to Indian Springs for supplies at times. Just past the CC turn off was a military installation on the Nevada Test Site. In the enclosure you could see replicas of the moon vehicles. Puts a question mark on that phase of the moon landings.
41mikmac 1 day ago
@41mikmac
Yeah they faked the moon landings just off road in plain view where idiots like you could drive by and see them that's genius thinking fuckface
Blahblobify 23 hours ago
"Buzz Aldrin - The Early Years" (or, "How I Learned to Love the Fake Regolith") /watch?v=IF4etaF6uN4
nameofthepen 1 day ago
They FAKED the Moonlandings. This video was recorded in a studio.
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 day ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer or on a beach to make footprints with so much definition. You would definitely need a lot of moisture to make the famous Buzzy Aldrin footprints.
mrwonderfulman2011 1 day ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer i agree
420ModernDayHippie 1 day ago
NASA gypped Jarah White by selling him stuff guaranteed to be something it wasn't.
NASA hoax. Ongoing for over 40 years now. NASAcrooks gypping all of us.
nameofthepen 1 day ago
@nameofthepen NASA is probably making a fortune of this fake lunar dust.
mrwonderfulman2011 1 day ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 - Ye$. Authentic as bottled (tap) water.
nameofthepen 1 day ago
(sigh) Still educating folks in English; a never-ending task, apparently.
Scare quotes are quotation marks placed around a word or phrase to indicate that it does not signify its literal or conventional meaning. - Wiki, Scare Quotes
Quotation marks can also be used to indicate a different meaning of a word or phrase than the one typically associated with it and are often used to express irony. - Wiki, Quotation Mark
nameofthepen 1 day ago
@nameofthepen Good. So Jarrah used soil that was unlike lunar soil to show that NASA never went to the moon?
Doesn't really make much sense either way.
krisdevalle 1 day ago
@krisdevalle Either way, the product was manufactured from NASA themselves and they sent it to Jarrah to do a demonstration. Jarrah proved that no footprint could have been created using that product and therefore, NASA never went to the moon. Simple stuff Kris!
mrwonderfulman2011 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mrdreadfultard2011
Hmm... indeed! Flawless logic. Kind of like when you need to go to the nearby village you will obviously choose to go by plane. Apart from the fact you'll first need to travel to the airport (which is probably farther away than the village), then fly to another airport (God only knows where that one is), and then get from the second airport to the village you set out to go to. Indeed, the logic behind is impeccable. Impeccable as in retarded.
GeneralSamov 1 day ago
@krisdevalle he bought the Regolith simulant right from NASA! Are you that dense?
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 day ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer Sure bro. But if they never went to the moon, then what is the simulant simulating?
krisdevalle 1 day ago
@krisdevalle It simulates your brain as it collapses in when Jarrah White steps on it.
Aeronauticalexplorer 21 hours ago
Hey lander fucktards. The moon mission's were giant failures.. Suck it up like at least a one nut man would do.. But the good news is that you get another chance by voting for Newt!!! He's going to get a city going on up there. Shit hot damn!!!!!
drummerbadass1 1 day ago
I always wanted to believe that NASA went to the moon, but they didn't and that's too bad! Why wouldn't anyone really want to believe that NASA went the moon? That's not what this forum is about and that's what I try to address. Why not question its reality? These shills get so worked up when anyone shows any disbelief or when an experiment shows any little bit of proof toward a hoax, the shills get so personal like they have something to hide?
mrwonderfulman2011 1 day ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 You seem a little worked up.
krisdevalle 1 day ago
@krisdevalle So do you meathead! You have said nothing but attacks and insults toward anyone who questions the moon landing. Speak for yourself Kris!
mrwonderfulman2011 1 day ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 It seems like they trying to help perpetuate the NASA moonlanding myth.
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 day ago
Just because bedroom experiments may have turned out badly for some people doesn't mean that Jarrah's *scientific* one wasn't valid. Apollo hoax! ;-)
nameofthepen 1 day ago
@nameofthepen What makes it rather amusing is that you feel that he used accurate lunar simulant to prove NASA never went to the moon, thus rendering the lunar simulant inaccurate.
So if they never went, what is the simulant simulating?
None of you turkeys seem to be able to answer that simple question.
krisdevalle 1 day ago
@krisdevalle You replied to the wrong person genius
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 day ago
@nameofthepen I think Kris is need of a diaper change he's so full of shit!
mrwonderfulman2011 1 day ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 He is full of himself. Same thing. lol!!!!!!!!!!
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 day ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 - Jarrah bought his "simulated lunar soil" from NASA.
nameofthepen 1 day ago
@nameofthepen Do go on. How did NASA know what to simulate?
krisdevalle 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nameofthepenis/mrdreadfultard2011
You're now posing questions to yourself and answering your own questions on the air? Are you absolutely certain you're not starting to develop schizophrenia?
GeneralSamov 1 day ago
This video was recorded in a studio NOT on the Moon.They never really walked on the Moon.
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 day ago
neil armstrong
LaughaLot013 1 day ago
It's too predictable of a video from my point of view. If these men really travelled all the way to the moon, you would certainly think they would be worried or would show some uncertainty in their voices. They didn't because they had nothing to worry about. Wink Wink! :)
mrwonderfulman2011 1 day ago
@mrwonderfulman2011
So they spent billions of dollars (and even if you believe its fake they spent billions of dollars making the saturn V's etc) but because the people behind the "Hoax" neglected to tell these actors to sound worried, that's proof that it's faked.
I've never noticed any astronaut's sounding worried as it happens... I suppose the international space station is also fake because the astronauts on it don't sound worried either....
Seriously get a brain.
paulosio 1 day ago
@paulosio Watch the Jarrah White video that shows how Aldrin's footprints were not possible to make! That's not too hard to watch even for you. If you can't understand it, I can explain it to you and to Kris. You both seem a little slow!
mrwonderfulman2011 1 day ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 "Watch the Jarrah White video that shows how Aldrin's footprints were not possible to make"
It is interesting that nobody seems to ask about the effects of 1/6th G on footprints. On earth, the angle of repose of a hill is determined in part by 1G. On the moon, that angle would be a lot steeper. The only way to really put the footprints to the test would be to do the "vomit comet" thing with an aircraft.
knowledgemonger 20 hours ago
@knowledgemonger Thats a good argument. First one I ever seen from a stupid NASA backer like you. Maybe it collapses because it is heavier.
Problem I have with the foot prints is that they are in the pictures but nothing from the rocket engine exhaust. How can there be foot prints and nothing from the exhaust hitting the ground? Not even a tiny mark from it. pfffftt!
Aeronauticalexplorer 19 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer You mean, apart from all the "sweeping marks" in the lunar dust? Yeah, apart from that, not much. But seriously, haven't we gone through all of this already?
GeneralSamov 18 hours ago
@GeneralSamov If it wasn't for repeating things that already have been debunked, the "we never went to the moon" folks wouldn't have anything to say. They bang on about stars that should not have been seen and the "shadows at angles" effect and wild made up nonsense about radiation and physics that only works in SiFi movies because that is all they have.
knowledgemonger 15 hours ago
@knowledgemonger You forgot about the astroNots falling at a lower rate of speed than objects not hooked up to wire supports. That ruins the whole moonlandings claim. Exposes the NASA bull shit lie.
Aeronauticalexplorer 14 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer
Like you falling on your head repeatedly during early childhood? What do you base your claim on? Percy's fucked up "research"
GeneralSamov 13 hours ago
@GeneralSamov Physics proves they were on wire supports.
Aeronauticalexplorer 10 hours ago
Comment removed
GeneralSamov 9 hours ago
@paulosio You have no brain. If you did you would know buy now that the International Space Station is only 150 miles off the ground. The Moon is way out 230,000 Miles AWAY!!! lol Do you have any understanding of the difference?
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 day ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer by*
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Aeronauticalexplorer
You are not supposed to randomly bang on keyboards. Get back to your group and eat some bananas or something.
GeneralSamov 1 day ago
@paulosio Yes. I have heard recordings of test pilots saying that they had a problem and were punching out. They don't sound worried. They report the situation quickly and clearly. It is the result of having to talk a lot while being worried about the aircraft holding together. The Apollo crews were test pilots. When things went wrong on Apollo 13 they reported it just like any test pilot will. There was a lot of heart warming stuff from Russia at that time.
knowledgemonger 20 hours ago
this should definitely have the most views on youtube.
EhHolepro 1 day ago
If you just forget the whole space race and all this hoax nonsense and just see it as a couple human beings on the moon, it sends shivers down my spine to think they were the only people on it at that time and now it has been left empty for years and years. I wish I could go there one day..
GroockG 1 day ago
Please can one of the hoax people answer me this... We all know that Neil Armstrong said "One small step for man" when he meant to say "...for A man".
"for man" and "for mankind" actually mean the same thing (although it was obvious what he meant).
So if this was all just a "movie", he messed up the most important line of the most important scene. So why the hell didn't they re-shoot it???
TheBaldmeister 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheBaldmeister
I now expect one of the tards to come up and say Neil's mistake was intentional, so that when the hoaxtards would eventually crawl out from under their rocks and claim it was faked NASA could say just what you did, "why did we not re-shoot it then?"
GeneralSamov 1 day ago
@GeneralSamov You're right - I was half expecting that reply. Of course, there's no convincing 'em. If you could fly them up there and show them the landing sites they would just say "well, obviously NASA put all this stuff up here recently". Then if you got them to look down a microscope and show that the amount of micrometeorite impacts on the equipment was consistent with 40+ years on the lunar surface they would say NASA somehow faked that too.
TheBaldmeister 11 hours ago
@TheBaldmeister
Actually, I think they'd commit suicide in some way just to show that there is DEADLY RADIATION OH NOES!!11
GeneralSamov 11 hours ago
@TheBaldmeister What do you base you belief on that anyone would say that? You are just making shit up now. You got nothing. There is just no way around all the evidence that they never walked on the Moon. Its a fact of life.
Aeronauticalexplorer 10 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer You can't even seem to find a single physicist to agree with you.
krisdevalle 10 hours ago
@krisdevalle Every single Physicist on the planet agrees with me that objects fall at the same rate of speed regardless of weight. Especially if on the Moon where there is no air. The astroNots fall at a much slower rate of speed than any other object in all of the NASA videos proving they are on wire supports as an attempt to simulate the 1:6 G. A Failed attempt at that. They faked it. It is clear as day.
Aeronauticalexplorer 10 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer I guess you didn't quite understand.
Any physicist who thinks the videos are faked?
krisdevalle 10 hours ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer You constantly make the false claim that the sand falls faster. Anyone who cares to can view the video frame by frame and see that this is simply false. The sand merely goes upwards more slowly than the person, comes back down more slowly and thus spends less time in the air. It is just like a person jumped 1 foot high while another jumped two feet high. They will spend different time in the air. This is exactly what we see in the video.
knowledgemonger 9 hours ago
@knowledgemonger Bull shit. If you go frame by frame you can see some sand is even higher than the astroNot and it falls and hits the floor while he is still up off the floor 12 inches. Total proof that you are an idiot liar and that they were on the wire supports. You FAIL
Aeronauticalexplorer 9 hours ago
@TheBaldmeister You know something; I really question the moon landing for many reasons. I also wonder a lot about the preparation of the dialogue too. It's as if the astronauts had a script planned before they left the planet. I mean, there was nothing strange about their voices from the time they stepped on to the moon "One small step for man ..." from the time they departed "What a ride, what a ride." In my opinion, the script was planned well ahead. Drama at its best! :)
mrwonderfulman2011 1 day ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 After questioning the validity of the NASA claim and researching and examining all the evidence against them, anyone with any common sense can see that they whole thing was Bull Shit.
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 day ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer If you watch that Jarrah White video about making footprints in the lunar soil, he completely deflates the Mythbusters demo and shows how they're a bunch of idiots that are in bed with NASA and manipulate an experiment to the point where they find the results they were hoping to find. They can't even do any experiment properly whereas White shows how moisture would be needed otherwise the dust collapses in on itself. The Buzz Aldrin little boy footprint is a complete joke!
mrwonderfulman2011 1 day ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 I know. The Mythbusters always have a predetermind outcome with the NASA experiments. Did you see the one they did with the Wire support and slow motion video? They called it "Busted" but never did the slow motion with the wire support On. The did them seperate. So Jarrah White took the video of the Mythbuster Jamie on the wire and Slowed it down and PRESTO instant NASA video Astronot jump. Exactly the same as the NASA video. Slow Motion AND the wire support is what NASA used
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 day ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer Yeah but we could see the wire there.
krisdevalle 1 day ago
@krisdevalle So your theory is that if don't see it, it is not there? You crack me up with your stupidity. You remind be of a dumb blonde headed bimbo. LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Aeronauticalexplorer 1 day ago
@Aeronauticalexplorer Don't forget with a really bad hat!
mrwonderfulman2011 1 day ago
@mrwonderfulman2011 "the script was planned well ahead. Drama at its best!" - Well, yes, obviously they did think ahead about what they would say at key moments. As I said, Neil Armstrong planned to say "One small step for A man" but missed out the "a".
TheBaldmeister 11 hours ago
"One small step for man , One giant dick in Russias mouth"-the was most Americans see this event .
crysisidiol999 1 day ago
Just knowing that we are little beings on a large ball floating in an unimaginably vast space makes me wonder why everything is the way it is. That is when I found a website called Truth Contest. You can search it in google and click on the top result. Then read "The Present" on the homepage.
bedtheater 1 day ago
ooo they doing the moonwalk!!
Mr1cam43 1 day ago
See comments on my channel. The man, never on the moon! I'm author of estabilidadeorbital.webnode.pt
MegaLogaritmo 1 day ago
@MegaLogaritmo
Hey Ufologo !
COMMOGSE 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MegaLogaritmo
The man, never on the moon! Please visit goatse. info/ for more ... info. Thanks!
GeneralSamov 1 day ago
Just take a look at the Apollo 11 crew,and tell me again how these 3 retarded sons of whores could have possibly been to the moon.What a laugh!
NASACrooks 2 days ago
@NASACrooks : Not hard to believe when considering you were able to log on to your computer and find the correct keys while typing.
JDQuantum 1 day ago
@NASACrooks - maybe they were also driving the "space shuttle"?
Totally LMAO at this "space shuttle footage": /watch?v=fi17lrcvPi4
nameofthepen 1 day ago