Shawn is endorsing the use of versions that come from the UBS Greek NT text. This text is nothing but the Pope's Vatican manuscript with necessary edits (due to the corrupt condition of Vaticanus itself).'
Click on my user name and watch the entire "Why KJV Only?" series. I give you the quotes and sources so you can look it up for yourself.
Don't be fooled by these novices (like Shawn) who read a couple of books and try to teach.
The King James placed the "apocrypha" between the testaments as historical material is found in modern Bibles, today.
You LIE because you purposely leave out the FACT that those apocryphal books are stuck WITHIN the Old and New Testament of the Vatican MSS that all new versions come from.
So, why the lies, Shawn? What spirit possesses you to bear false witness against the word of God?
Read, "Forever Settled," by Jack Moorman for the FACTS that refute your lies.
C. Martini is a Roman Catholic apostate who rejected the Gospel.
K. Aland was a liberal apostate who rejected the apostolic authorship of all four Gospels and most New Testament books, while also rejecting the canonicity of several books.
The fact these men spent their lives pushing the acceptance of their Vaticanus-based Greek text is bad enough.
The fact they are unsaved apostates is even worse.
And the fact you support them speaks volumes about your own soul.
Your information about the King James is FALSE. The KJV translators had access to Vaticanus and Erasmus was given Vaticanus readings while producing his Greek NT text. BOTH rejected Vaticanus.
The fragments you mention contain Antioch text readings (from which the KJV was taken) that PRE-DATE your beloved 4th Century Alexandriam MSS.
Your whole spill about "textual criticism" is a whitewash. The only thing text critics have done is push the Pope's Vatican MSS onto the Christian world.
All watching this should not this FACT.
Shawn is endorsing the use of versions that come from the UBS Greek NT text. This text is nothing but the Pope's Vatican manuscript with necessary edits (due to the corrupt condition of Vaticanus itself).'
Click on my user name and watch the entire "Why KJV Only?" series. I give you the quotes and sources so you can look it up for yourself.
Don't be fooled by these novices (like Shawn) who read a couple of books and try to teach.
1 Timothy 3:6
bbbfohio 2 years ago
All watching this should NOTE this fact.
Youtube wouldn't allow me to delete and repost the edit....
bbbfohio 2 years ago
You LIE.
The King James placed the "apocrypha" between the testaments as historical material is found in modern Bibles, today.
You LIE because you purposely leave out the FACT that those apocryphal books are stuck WITHIN the Old and New Testament of the Vatican MSS that all new versions come from.
So, why the lies, Shawn? What spirit possesses you to bear false witness against the word of God?
Read, "Forever Settled," by Jack Moorman for the FACTS that refute your lies.
bbbfohio 2 years ago
At 2:30 in your video...
C. Martini is a Roman Catholic apostate who rejected the Gospel.
K. Aland was a liberal apostate who rejected the apostolic authorship of all four Gospels and most New Testament books, while also rejecting the canonicity of several books.
The fact these men spent their lives pushing the acceptance of their Vaticanus-based Greek text is bad enough.
The fact they are unsaved apostates is even worse.
And the fact you support them speaks volumes about your own soul.
bbbfohio 2 years ago
Your information about the King James is FALSE. The KJV translators had access to Vaticanus and Erasmus was given Vaticanus readings while producing his Greek NT text. BOTH rejected Vaticanus.
The fragments you mention contain Antioch text readings (from which the KJV was taken) that PRE-DATE your beloved 4th Century Alexandriam MSS.
Your whole spill about "textual criticism" is a whitewash. The only thing text critics have done is push the Pope's Vatican MSS onto the Christian world.
bbbfohio 2 years ago
Very few KJV only people claim that "God inspired the KJV translators."
So, right off the bat, you are building straw men to tear down and claim victory, but you've only succeeded in attacking dumb arguments with no basis.
It's comparable to my saying, "There are those who believe the NIV is the best translation and that the King James Bible is of the devil."
Of course, I could prove that statement is true but he problem is, very FEW actually make such a claim in the first place!
bbbfohio 2 years ago