Federer has NOT proved that he is too good for kids like Nadal... heck, who won the last 2 GS finals between Roger and Rafa: in particular, on GRASS and HARDCOURT???
Roger Federer can beat Nadal! He did it and he can do it again! They are both great tennis players and we can't assume that Nadal is always going to beat Federer!
wow, its amazing how you remember all of nadals physical problems, while you do not allow federer that same concession when he had glandular fever. If you don't believe that affected him, then you don't deserve to watch either of them play.
Did you ever notice that through-out most of the year Fed had a massive spot on his cheek? It wasn't cos he was eating too much chocolate, it was a symptom of a dibilitating sporting illness.
Nike made those ads. McEnroe, Woods, Jordan, Williams all wanted to congratulate him. Netjets made the ad after the French Open stating "congrats on record tying 14th Grand Slam Titles" They changed it to 15 for wimby. The jacket in the interview could've been big printed 15 on it. He didn't bring it up the reporter did. He tried to be modest about it and shrug it off. Tennis players are superstitious and very rewarding to themselves. He's been having the titles on his shoes for yrs
now that federrer has surpassed petes record; I am still at odds whether federer was better than pete overall because in petes time their were dozens of nadals and it was very difficult/competitive for pete to win, but the only two stars who stand out I really see in tennis today is nadal and federrer. still Congratulations to federrer for winning his 15th grand slams he deserved the win and the title of most succesful tennis player in history
well, i don't really agree with you , i think there are a lot of special players too apart from nadal and federer, but federer is so good that he makes them look as they are not special...
If Federer had won the 1st set of 2009 Wimbledon final, then he wins the final against Andy Roddick a lot easier than he ended up doing - 16-14 in the fifth set. Federer murders sets he should have won - like 2008 Australian Open semi-final against Djokovic.
My prediction is that if the 2009 Wimbledon final goes 5 sets, Roger can't win because of his HEAD, not his game! Roddick will win his first Wimbledone today. Plus, Roddick's strategy is not to give Roger any pace (except serve) to work from. Roger is stagnant!
I wish Roger would win today, but I don't think he has the GUTS, the HEAD, the GUMPTION to win today.
Can't wait for tomorrow's final. Both Andy and Roger are amazing players but when you see points like this one you just can't believe that anyone but Federer deserves to be the Champion. He's a Genius, full stop. Thanks for uploading the video, I missed that match.
My prediction is that Andy Murry will win Wimbledon this year. He has an excellent record against Roddick and Federer, plus Murry will have the entire country routing for him. It's over, Roger, it's freakn over!
Congrats, Murry
Sorry, Federer
I love Roger, but have to face reality this year.
nickyrko, sorry, but Andy Murry has a 6-2 record against Roger, and Murry won Queens just before coming into Wimbledon which boosted his confidence, plus Murry will have the entire country backing him. Roger doesn't have a chance and will lose in 3 straights sets because of the pressure.
I love Roger and want him to win too, but let's face it...
Andy Murray is still young, he can improve his style. He has to be more aggressive, and not depend on his opponent's errors to score points. He can do away with the unclassy attitude as well, like rejoicing when his opponent makes mistakes. Also, he needs to be fitter, he looks like he's out of breath after a short rally and seems to spend energy at the start, instead of spending his energy wisely and upping his level at the right moments.
ok murray won queens but federers been to the final 6 straight times, hes on a 15+ winning streak, including beating rafa on clay in madrid final and winning at RG so rogers confidence is sky high also. as for giving in to pressure , hes won 14 slam titles, not to mention beating agassi in US open final infront of 22,000 americans.
That's an awesome point-ending shot from backhand side far off the court down the line by Federer. Amazing ability to anticipate and cover the court. He'll go down the history as the best tennis player ever..... more versatile than Pete Sampres (Hispanic); hit the ball harder than Andrei Aggassi (Iranian); better footwork than Bjorn Borg (Sweden).
Lets give some credit to the Chinese guy! His back was turned to the ball when he played it. It took a moment of genius from Federer to return that amazing shot from the Chinese guy.
I think Nadal has a better H2H because he has Federer number and many matches were played on clay , Nadal favourite surface.. At Grandslam level, Nadal ever beat Federer on grass, clay and hard while Federer just beat Nadal on grass. However, overall Federer is a better player because he is the most achieve tennis player and dominates more players , more tournaments than Nadal
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Nadal is better!!! How many times did Federer lost to Nadal? How many times did Nadal lost to Federer? Its simple mathematics! Federer will never in his live has a positiv record against NADAL. NEVER!!
With your same logic: Nalbandian is better because he has a better record against Nadal, therefore Nalbandian is the best tennis player in the world... WTF??? I think no one will agree with that, ain't it? So please give up with the crap and think about what are you gonna post before doing it.
his record speaks for itself... and every educated tennis fan knows that your ability to be the worlds best DOES NOT rest on your ability to beat one player, players have contrasting styles, styles which can cancel eachothers out, and nadals simply works well against federer BUT, true greatness is defined by how you beat everyone else over a prolonged period, for years federer has made professionals at every stage look like rookies, he has won 14 grandslams, 20 consecutive GS semi apps.
seriously, nadal can suck my dick, i mean, he can be good but hes spanish dude... therefore, hes gay.
But, being serious, i really think Federer is better, Nadal may beat him but he isnt better than Federer, i mean he MIGHT be at the future but its definitly not better now,
are you fucking retarded only because he is spanish he is gay are you stupid and they both have goods and bads but the problem with federer is that he tries to put the ball next to the line and most of the time he doesnt
dont get me wrong im a federer fan but he does fuck up
In a word NO. Nadal is not better. he has had to run himself into the ground to compete with Roger and displace him for a few months. Nadal is probably nearer the end of his time in the top 5 than Roger is and his head to head record V Roger is entirely dependent on most games playes on clay. Away from clay Nadal is not dominant V Roger.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
shut the fuck up talking shit. nadal has been beating federer on all surfaces recently and outplayed federer in the 07 wimbledon final and was unlucky to lose. since when was running yourself into the ground illegal. if federer was so great he would be able to find a way around nadals tactics more often but he isnt as good as everyone makes out. he has only won the amount of majors he has as there was no real competition for about the 1st 8-9 he won. he doesnt win them regularly anymore
whose fault is that that federer had no competition, he was levels above everyone else on tour, and just recently, some players are starting to catch up to his level. sure, hes got a losing record against nadal but where the hell is nadal right now??? federer is looking for his next grand slam where nadal is probably sitting at home crying. federer will most likely to sustain his level of play for a very long time to shut the fuck up!
not just that, federers greatness FORCED the rest of the tennis world to match HIS level, because HE was so damn good!!!!!!!... FEDERER alone is responsible for the level of play on the mens circuit, the rest of the players have been forced to up their games to sellar new heights if they wanted a chance of winning any slams. well said mate.... btw, love the name, safin rules.
oh and for the record.... the last 3 grand slams?!.... fed has won two.... and is about to win 3/4.... some dip in form, 'doesnt win them regularly anymore'.... catch a grip mate.
what made it even more amazing was that it was a conventional angled backhand rather than a backhand slice which would be easier to perform when reaching he ball wide of the court. Awesome shot
damn...omg...this is reason why he is best player ever..this is just god given talent..amazing...with full speed omg i m still amazed...love him and i will watch every wimbledon 2009 match hope he wins it all
ROGER FEDERER THE BEST
rrrooobbbeee6 1 year ago
rafa nadal el mejor
ilprimoragazzo8 1 year ago
Boomerang Snake XD
MisterDoctorr 2 years ago
fuck, and that was an awesome BH slam dunk by lu as well.
BrotherTree1 2 years ago
round the post
angryboiy 2 years ago
let us not talk about who WILL...fact of the matter is Federrer has prooved that he is too good for kids like Nadal..
@fedthebest1...he is not your fan, you are his fan...he he
adityath 2 years ago 2
Federer has NOT proved that he is too good for kids like Nadal... heck, who won the last 2 GS finals between Roger and Rafa: in particular, on GRASS and HARDCOURT???
therobz98 2 years ago
Federer's every victory makes me so happy. He is my best fan ever. And I am so glad to live in an era to witness the brilliance of this man !
fedthebest1 2 years ago 5
@fedthebest1 me too :) :) :)
lbetweenthebars 1 year ago
simply the best!
maripont 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Rafa reached #1 beating Roger time after time in big finals and he will do it again.
Fed returned to the top while Nadal was gone.
NOT THE SAME
miguelucho20008 2 years ago
Roger Federer can beat Nadal! He did it and he can do it again! They are both great tennis players and we can't assume that Nadal is always going to beat Federer!
Peyton974 2 years ago 12
wow, its amazing how you remember all of nadals physical problems, while you do not allow federer that same concession when he had glandular fever. If you don't believe that affected him, then you don't deserve to watch either of them play.
Did you ever notice that through-out most of the year Fed had a massive spot on his cheek? It wasn't cos he was eating too much chocolate, it was a symptom of a dibilitating sporting illness.
You don't have to be so ignorant
Jamus182 2 years ago 3
I heard that was a bee sting...
CounttomS 2 years ago
I was just repeating what I herd from a few different sources.
You could be right, its just that the first time i saw the spot was when he played in estoril, and it was still there past the french open.
Jamus182 2 years ago
lucky ballboy, i think he was a bit in danger at that amazing shot :-)
r2d2x2b2 2 years ago 2
amazing point
Bandermath 2 years ago 4
Solo Roger hace ver estos golpes espectaculares, puro talento.
queneliz2 2 years ago 3
man they should play wimbledon on the outside courts and then play the final on centre court when the grass is like this
pdiddymob 2 years ago 10
he exactly count the steps to the ball, and it was perfect...
8Julieth8 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
congrats Fed. But I hate his NIKE comercials after match point. That is respectless as well as his coat with a golden 15 stitched on.
ulizinho 2 years ago
Nike made those ads. McEnroe, Woods, Jordan, Williams all wanted to congratulate him. Netjets made the ad after the French Open stating "congrats on record tying 14th Grand Slam Titles" They changed it to 15 for wimby. The jacket in the interview could've been big printed 15 on it. He didn't bring it up the reporter did. He tried to be modest about it and shrug it off. Tennis players are superstitious and very rewarding to themselves. He's been having the titles on his shoes for yrs
biggabenne 2 years ago 12
This has been flagged as spam show
now that federrer has surpassed petes record; I am still at odds whether federer was better than pete overall because in petes time their were dozens of nadals and it was very difficult/competitive for pete to win, but the only two stars who stand out I really see in tennis today is nadal and federrer. still Congratulations to federrer for winning his 15th grand slams he deserved the win and the title of most succesful tennis player in history
mechysonu1 2 years ago
well, i don't really agree with you , i think there are a lot of special players too apart from nadal and federer, but federer is so good that he makes them look as they are not special...
fedmar77 2 years ago 6
federer won, but Roddick is a winner today too
Anamita23 2 years ago 10
If Federer had won the 1st set of 2009 Wimbledon final, then he wins the final against Andy Roddick a lot easier than he ended up doing - 16-14 in the fifth set. Federer murders sets he should have won - like 2008 Australian Open semi-final against Djokovic.
Richardhedditch261 2 years ago
In the end he still won... whats up with you people? he's the best ever, face it
Salmayka 2 years ago 7
Grande Roger! The number one!!!
crazyclip71 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
My prediction is that if the 2009 Wimbledon final goes 5 sets, Roger can't win because of his HEAD, not his game! Roddick will win his first Wimbledone today. Plus, Roddick's strategy is not to give Roger any pace (except serve) to work from. Roger is stagnant!
I wish Roger would win today, but I don't think he has the GUTS, the HEAD, the GUMPTION to win today.
TennisUSTA 2 years ago
Nice prediction...
tatunavalha 2 years ago 2
Might want to stuff a tennis ball in your mouth :)
chatelet55 2 years ago
Wrong :)
StevenCBlah 2 years ago
HE JUST PROVED YOU WRONG!!!
ullorbrolly 2 years ago
WOW
ihatebotsxxx 2 years ago
that was amazing
if you love roger comment me
tennisdude24 2 years ago 3
Roger is a living legend!!
bichoalder 2 years ago 3
what are you talking about?? why so bitter?
bichoalder 2 years ago
Can't wait for tomorrow's final. Both Andy and Roger are amazing players but when you see points like this one you just can't believe that anyone but Federer deserves to be the Champion. He's a Genius, full stop. Thanks for uploading the video, I missed that match.
drivel2 2 years ago
every other country in the world except for scottland, england and wales are fu*cking delighted that MURRAY WONT BE IN THE FINAL AND NEVER WILL
thedicebreen 2 years ago
hey hey hey im from britain and i love murrays out imk a roger fan and yes there are federer fans over here
alywen06 2 years ago
Murray is not even going into the Final ahahha,
Go Roddick
pgoody 2 years ago
My prediction is that Andy Murry will win Wimbledon this year. He has an excellent record against Roddick and Federer, plus Murry will have the entire country routing for him. It's over, Roger, it's freakn over!
Congrats, Murry
Sorry, Federer
I love Roger, but have to face reality this year.
FrenchLanguage 2 years ago
how u love roger if u dont belive in him then
bojack99 2 years ago
federer is simply the best of all time
cmon roger win wimbledon
nickyrko 2 years ago 3
nickyrko, sorry, but Andy Murry has a 6-2 record against Roger, and Murry won Queens just before coming into Wimbledon which boosted his confidence, plus Murry will have the entire country backing him. Roger doesn't have a chance and will lose in 3 straights sets because of the pressure.
I love Roger and want him to win too, but let's face it...
FrenchLanguage 2 years ago
murray is out... so my predictions were RIGHT.. roger will play roddick and will win easy xD... c'mon roger
nickyrko 2 years ago 2
Andy Murray is still young, he can improve his style. He has to be more aggressive, and not depend on his opponent's errors to score points. He can do away with the unclassy attitude as well, like rejoicing when his opponent makes mistakes. Also, he needs to be fitter, he looks like he's out of breath after a short rally and seems to spend energy at the start, instead of spending his energy wisely and upping his level at the right moments.
martiandoll 2 years ago
sume fan of roger you are murry is not going to be in the final
bojack99 2 years ago
you really dotn know tennis do you lol.
Head to head means crap all in a slam final and on grass which i must remind you roger rules on he has only lost a slam final to rafa your not a fan.
Yes i do watch some of rogers matchs and go oh crap what was that and then he wins deep down i know he will its just the nerves whilst watching it
alywen06 2 years ago
Yeah, let's face it.... ROGER WILL WIN ANOTHER WIMBLEDON. Your prediction is an Epic Fail.
v1m9s8m8 2 years ago
ok murray won queens but federers been to the final 6 straight times, hes on a 15+ winning streak, including beating rafa on clay in madrid final and winning at RG so rogers confidence is sky high also. as for giving in to pressure , hes won 14 slam titles, not to mention beating agassi in US open final infront of 22,000 americans.
forder07 2 years ago
And Murray is out of the tournament, so that will help. Worth Noting that Murray won queens..... without roger or rafa playing...
Seamalicous 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
to check out full wimbledon videos without having to search go to my channel, check it out - you'll love it
ENJOY
SportPassTV
SportPassTV 2 years ago
this guys a beast. most ppl wouldve given up on that play. 14 grand slams and counting. he got this in da bag
100points1game 2 years ago
That's an awesome point-ending shot from backhand side far off the court down the line by Federer. Amazing ability to anticipate and cover the court. He'll go down the history as the best tennis player ever..... more versatile than Pete Sampres (Hispanic); hit the ball harder than Andrei Aggassi (Iranian); better footwork than Bjorn Borg (Sweden).
tyoungos 2 years ago
Sampras is Greek-American. Otherwise, I agree.
dipseatrail 2 years ago 5
Lets give some credit to the Chinese guy! His back was turned to the ball when he played it. It took a moment of genius from Federer to return that amazing shot from the Chinese guy.
plica06 2 years ago 6
lol its not hard to hit a ball with ur back turned
Ibanez3213 2 years ago
the guy's from taiwan, not china.
forreal22 2 years ago
I think Nadal has a better H2H because he has Federer number and many matches were played on clay , Nadal favourite surface.. At Grandslam level, Nadal ever beat Federer on grass, clay and hard while Federer just beat Nadal on grass. However, overall Federer is a better player because he is the most achieve tennis player and dominates more players , more tournaments than Nadal
nes4l 2 years ago 3
nadals play generally only works on federer. Federers play works just about on everyone
ck1793 2 years ago 3
@ck1793
yes that's the point hahaha xD
I guess nadal is gonna get tired soon and then federer is gonna be nr 1 again! xD
xSebfighterx 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nadal is better!!! How many times did Federer lost to Nadal? How many times did Nadal lost to Federer? Its simple mathematics! Federer will never in his live has a positiv record against NADAL. NEVER!!
bigarea51 2 years ago
With your same logic: Nalbandian is better because he has a better record against Nadal, therefore Nalbandian is the best tennis player in the world... WTF??? I think no one will agree with that, ain't it? So please give up with the crap and think about what are you gonna post before doing it.
v1m9s8m8 2 years ago 2
that's the most idiotic thing i've heard.
TheUkrainian1990 2 years ago
Possibly Fed will never have a winning H2H V Nadal......Nadal can't qualify for enough non grass finals. Off grass Fed is ahead.
tigerarmyrule 2 years ago
not exactly, on clay nadal is ahead, on grass it is very even, indoors it is very even, and on the outdoor hardcourts federer is better
rfcspankoufc 2 years ago
20 consecutive semifinal
19 GS final and won 14 of them.
peakogo 2 years ago
how can federer be the best ever when he has a huge losing record to nadal. nadal has proved time and time again he's better
LorcanDMeath 2 years ago
his record speaks for itself... and every educated tennis fan knows that your ability to be the worlds best DOES NOT rest on your ability to beat one player, players have contrasting styles, styles which can cancel eachothers out, and nadals simply works well against federer BUT, true greatness is defined by how you beat everyone else over a prolonged period, for years federer has made professionals at every stage look like rookies, he has won 14 grandslams, 20 consecutive GS semi apps.
BoM45 2 years ago
seriously, nadal can suck my dick, i mean, he can be good but hes spanish dude... therefore, hes gay.
But, being serious, i really think Federer is better, Nadal may beat him but he isnt better than Federer, i mean he MIGHT be at the future but its definitly not better now,
PosesivoOnline 2 years ago
you're right!!! nadal sucks!!
saicxs 2 years ago
are you fucking retarded only because he is spanish he is gay are you stupid and they both have goods and bads but the problem with federer is that he tries to put the ball next to the line and most of the time he doesnt
dont get me wrong im a federer fan but he does fuck up
anwarjaja 2 years ago
what a retarded comment lol
orelero 2 years ago
ITs Tough to call they both fantastic
SparkieBud 2 years ago
federer you will be the 1 forever
melendi666 2 years ago 3
i dont no much about tennis but isnt nadal better????
SUBIESAMURAI07 2 years ago
In a word NO. Nadal is not better. he has had to run himself into the ground to compete with Roger and displace him for a few months. Nadal is probably nearer the end of his time in the top 5 than Roger is and his head to head record V Roger is entirely dependent on most games playes on clay. Away from clay Nadal is not dominant V Roger.
tigerarmyrule 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
shut the fuck up talking shit. nadal has been beating federer on all surfaces recently and outplayed federer in the 07 wimbledon final and was unlucky to lose. since when was running yourself into the ground illegal. if federer was so great he would be able to find a way around nadals tactics more often but he isnt as good as everyone makes out. he has only won the amount of majors he has as there was no real competition for about the 1st 8-9 he won. he doesnt win them regularly anymore
LorcanDMeath 2 years ago
whose fault is that that federer had no competition, he was levels above everyone else on tour, and just recently, some players are starting to catch up to his level. sure, hes got a losing record against nadal but where the hell is nadal right now??? federer is looking for his next grand slam where nadal is probably sitting at home crying. federer will most likely to sustain his level of play for a very long time to shut the fuck up!
safinator101 2 years ago
not just that, federers greatness FORCED the rest of the tennis world to match HIS level, because HE was so damn good!!!!!!!... FEDERER alone is responsible for the level of play on the mens circuit, the rest of the players have been forced to up their games to sellar new heights if they wanted a chance of winning any slams. well said mate.... btw, love the name, safin rules.
BoM45 2 years ago
oh and for the record.... the last 3 grand slams?!.... fed has won two.... and is about to win 3/4.... some dip in form, 'doesnt win them regularly anymore'.... catch a grip mate.
BoM45 2 years ago 3
You're ridiculous mate...
schronzel 2 years ago
youre just stupid nadal is over i dont think he come back with that power that he has before
federer is the living legeng!
a7xflo 2 years ago 5
damn he still does some "Federer shots" even at 27, amazing
Mendelevium146 2 years ago 3
Simply the best
Simply perfection..... Roger, Nº 1 in tennis.
Nadal ass easy... LOL
guillemas18 2 years ago 5
Federer is still the best, you can see it, in this viedeo.*****
and
MegaAppleiphone, this is the wrong subject
thorbenets 2 years ago
that´s the reason why he is the best
Reggen1 2 years ago
C'est pas serieux!!!
Master and Commander!!!
Mailler93 2 years ago
what made it even more amazing was that it was a conventional angled backhand rather than a backhand slice which would be easier to perform when reaching he ball wide of the court. Awesome shot
dnur567 2 years ago
now that was a shot!
ValentaThrashUK 2 years ago
peRFection..
GO ROGER!
FEDERERTURKEYFAN 2 years ago
fed just rockd that azn
cocojumbo77 2 years ago
just sick...federer is so technique
dempty 2 years ago
Comment removed
dempty 2 years ago
damn...omg...this is reason why he is best player ever..this is just god given talent..amazing...with full speed omg i m still amazed...love him and i will watch every wimbledon 2009 match hope he wins it all
tuse1991 2 years ago
OHHHH.....Come on now!!!! That's just sick!!!
xman4un 2 years ago
only he can provide such a shot from the backhand side at full speed
TheDelija94 2 years ago
WOW!
dragovishtitza 2 years ago
WOW!
dragovishtitza 2 years ago
grand Federer
adrianeksm 2 years ago
Those are the knees of a champion :D Great shot, as always, from Roger :D
chloewhite 2 years ago
hahaha dont be mean to rafa dude GO RF
Fmoya93 2 years ago
Thats ridiculous, it was a kickass volley, anyone else clear winner! Go On Fed
Rapid09025 2 years ago 2
pure class
RMarsenal 2 years ago
COME ON
elpozeta 2 years ago
fucken awesome
stokedfish 2 years ago 3
Rogeeer :D
lubimaciel7 2 years ago