Tax systems have become so complicated because of big-business-big-money-lobbyist that corrupt our democratic system. It's not the pure politicians themselves, it's special interest money that bribes politicians to get those difficult articles in tax laws that makes their tax deductions possible
@thetrueprometheus - I sure hope she is. That was more common sense in five minutes than what you typically see in a year's worth of congressional hearings.
@StateExempt Yeah, if you're a multimillionaire, everything she says absolutely stands to reason, let the leaders of the corporatocracy we live in do absolutely anything they like with no restraint nor accountability, but what about the other ninety nine per-fucking-cent of us?
When ninety nine percent of the population exist to service one percent, and you have a glorified hooker using her tits to successfully sell this economic nonsense as something laudable, we're a sorry lot indeed.
@thetrueprometheus - What does any of that have to do with the fact that the cost of IRS regulatory compliance is greater than that of the FBI and CIA?
@thetrueprometheus - I would think that collecting money would be less troublesome than spying on the world as a whole but I guess this makes me a "dim wit..."
@StateExempt The fact that you fail to grasp the fundamentals of where Government money comes from is evidence that you have room in your head for a three piece suite, yes.
@StateExempt - It's quite simple. Any Government money comes from the people in the form of tax revenue. Governments don't have money, the public infrastructure belongs to the people. If you want a military, a health service that provides universal coverage, a Federal Reserve to bail out your Financial Sector when it fucks up, a transport network, a Police Force et cetera, then you have to pay tax.
In order to process this tax, you need to have an Inland Revenue Service, and since that deals
with collection of tax money from three hundred million people, one would expect it to require a far larger bureaucracy than a single Government project like the FBI.
Now, let's analyze what balloon tits is saying here step by step.
The IRS is bad because people have to submit a tax return once a year. Boo fucking Hoo. Welcome to paradise. That happens to most people in every civilized nation on Earth.
The IRS has immense power to destroy people's lives? Hyperbole. A stupid argument from
emotion. You all expect a policeman to come running every time your in trouble, you all expect public infrastructure to be maintained, so where does balloon tits suggest the money for this come from if not the IRS? Oh, that's right, she doesn't. She rubbishes the IRS and offers no alternative.
I'm a college student, she says. She isn't even qualified yet. She then admits that filling in a tax return is too complicated for her. My three year old niece could handle it for fuck's sake.
Next piece of mendacity. Obama has not put the IRS in charge of running a Government healthcare system. The healthcare system in the USA is run by private firms. Balloon tits doesn't even have her basic facts right.
People who call up the IRS have to hold the line for twelve minutes? Oh diddums! Times are hard!
The IRS provides inaccurate information millions of times every year? What a vague, wooly, half baked statement. No proof, no citations to a statistical source. She's bloody
lucky I'm not marking her presentation. It's one of the poorest I've ever seen. No real information, just a blatant appeal to the general laziness of the populace.
The tax code is a "nightmare"? Is she for fucking real? Subjective opinions do not belong is this kind of presentation. This girl is on an intellectual par with Sarah Palin.
The compliance graph at 3:50 is another piece of lunacy. It stands to reason that large corporations are going to have to spend more money on compliance
than households. A large corporation is many orders of magnitude more complex to run than a household.
To sum up, she makes a lot of sweeping generalizations about how a flat tax would be great for the people, solve all of America's social ills and clean up the political system. She gives no explanation of how she arrives at this conclusion.
To sum up, she's very pretty, but she is incapable of structuring and critiquing an argument. This presentation gets an F.
@thetrueprometheus - She suggests that those things should be funded by a tax code much simpler than the one we have now that does not consist of thousands of pages that IRS agents themselves are not fully familiar with.
@StateExempt Well, in actual fact she barely addresses compliance in any meaningful way in the video. If she perhaps elaborated on why the cost of compliance was so eye wateringly high and how it could be streamlined and executed more efficiently, I might happen to agree with her, but the crux of her presentation seems to be that there should be a reduction in taxation, which is already lower than it has been since the depression. Lowering taxes comes with social costs that affect us all.
- The tax code we have now is thousands upon thousands of pages long and growing.
- Instead of one that takes so much of our time (google "Compliance Costs & Tax Complexity" to see just how much), why not reduce the complexity of the code so that we don't spend billions of hours and billions of dollars making sure we comply with each rule in our current code?
@StateExempt "While I think everything you mention could be provided by user fees only, you are still missing the point."
The problem with doing things that way is that you then have to pay unemployed people enough benefit money to pay all the end user fees for such things as medical treatments they need and public infrastructure they have to use. That would end up being more expensive.
Unless of course you want to be like Joe Stalin and let people left behind by the system die?
@thetrueprometheus - You still have yet to address her original point that you took issue with, namely that the cost of regulatory compliance with the IRS is more than the FBI and CIA.
Not that I think the things you listed are necessarily provided by regional sovereigns, but that is an unrelated issue.
@StateExempt I did address it. Nice things like public infrastructure and social inclusion cost money, ergo we need Inland revenue services to collect it. This service requires organization and that costs money.
All her suggestion of flat tax does is insure that the income of rich people will grow at a higher rate than it does now while that of ordinary people will not keep pace with inflation. That is in fact already happening since the onset of the GFC, and a flat tax will exacerbate it.
Her presentation demonstrates no understanding of basic economic principles. It appears to have completely escaped her notice that the USA is facing a budget deficit that is greater than the entire GDP of any of the developed nations except China and Japan. To drastically reduce the amount of income the Government have to tackle this would be utter madness.
@StateExempt We need a radical rethink. We need to open new sectors and start producing stuff again, employing our own people rather than propping up China and Malaysia's economies.
The current generation of politicians we have in power in the USA and Europe inspire me with no confidence that we can do this.
@thetrueprometheus - Once again, you ignore the main point of the vid which was NOT about paying taxes in general, but the cost of COMPLYING with the current code as is.
Raising revenue and complying with thousands of pages of tax code that requires a multi-hundred billion dollar industry (liberty tax, turbo tax, etc) to comply are two different things.
@StateExempt What is undesirable about that is that if you're a low waged worker it will take you below the poverty line. Even Adam Smith approved of progressive taxes. Even Milton Friedman of all people agreed with negative income tax for those on low wages.
It is not reasonable that someone who struggles to make ends meet should pay the same percentage of income in tax as someone who has much more than he or she needs.
@StateExempt So yeah, it's more than the FBI or the CIA.
I would expect it to cost more than them, and it should cost more than them as it requires a feat of far greater organization to achieve.
She says that the Inland Revenue costs more than the CIA and FBI as if that actually means something. A bottle of Jim Beam costs more than a tube of toothpaste. So fucking what?
@thetrueprometheus - "A bottle of Jim Beam costs more than a tube of toothpaste. So fucking what?"
What we have is a situation in which the toothpaste costs more than the Jim Beam, which is what she is criticizing in the first place.
The cost of filing out paperwork should not exceed two intelligence agencies combined, and for the third time, that is not the same thing as actually raising revenue in general.
Running intelligence services requires far less man power and organization than collecting three hundred million people's taxes.
It's a stupid comparison. It's like comparing spark plugs with mp3 players. It sounds dramatic, but on any kind of examination of what it actually tells you, it's irrelevant. It tells you nothing.
@thetrueprometheus - It shouldn't. Not if all you are doing is collecting a "fee."
We spend in excess of $300,000,000,000 per year (to companies like Liberty Tax and what have you) making sure our payment complies with the massive tax code we have now. That averages out to roughly a thousand dollars per person per year to pay a "fee."
Do you think we could do better than the nearly 75,000 page long tax code we have now?
@StateExempt I don't think there would be any harm in simplifying the tax system, but thinking that a flat tax is going to solve America's social problems is, to put it mildly, stupid.
I would also like to see some proof, a link to statistical sources, that further explains this asserted figure of three hundred billion.
@thetrueprometheus - To be honest, I am a little mixed in opinion myself about what type of tax system we ought to move to even though I think there is massive room for improvement from the one we have.
The $300,000,000,000 figure comes from the cumulative revenue in the tax assistance industry. It is money spent by groups and individuals to firms like Liberty Tax to make sure they have complied with the nearly 75,000 page tax code.
I am betting most of those rules are cronyism by design.
@StateExempt Franky, I don't disagree with you on that. Not at all... If The systemic problems in the USA are anything like the EU, and I know damned well that they are, you'll be living under a bloated, self serving bureaucracy that is rife with corruption and cronyism.
When people like this girl in the video talk about small Government though, they aren't talking about eliminating inefficiency, they're talking about having a state that doesn't tax and doesn't do anything for anyone.
@thetrueprometheus The thing with the three hundred billion figure, I don't think it was all that clear on phase. Is it over a year? Ten years?
If over a year, that means it costs a thousand dollars per person in the USA to do a tax return. I find that very hard to believe. Even in the UK our system is nowhere near that risibly ineffective. If it really is that bad, it's not a flat tax you need, it's jail sentences for the people in charge of the fiasco.
@thetrueprometheus - The girl specifically is not talking about a totally tax-free society per se, but you are right to say she wants government to be smaller than it is now.
I think we agree enough already on cronyism in the code itself though. If 75,000 pages are needed to explain collecting revenue, I sense corruption. There is a documentary called "An Inconvenient Tax" that has people from Noam Chomsky to Ron Paul all giving their critiques of the current system but I have yet to see it.
@StateExempt - Agreed. That is definitely a common trick used in political whitewashes. If there is a detail that certain people would like to keep hidden, they embed it in a single paragraph of a two hundred page report, most of which is dry waffle that puts the reader to sleep.
I believe in a large Government that takes care of it's people's needs. If the Government can't do that, we'd be as well not having one at all. I guess this is a debate that we'll always be on opposite sides of.
@thetrueprometheus I think the idea that government, large,or small, exists to take care of it's peoples needs is antithetical to the American system. My general understanding of our constitutions purpose is that it was written in order to protect the individual rights of the citizenry that they may pursue their lives...
@59arkady Your ignorance of who was running the country when the Government abrogated responsiblilty for acting as a regulator of market forces is not my concern.
Surely you must know what Reaganomics is? If not, and you want a political history lesson, I suggest you consult google. That is what the Web is for.
@thetrueprometheus - Yes or no: Do we really need a tax code that requires an industry costing us hundreds of billions of dollars to make sure we fill the forms out right or should we stick with a simpler code that does not require that additional cost?
@StateExempt "Yes or no: Do we really need a tax code that requires an industry costing us hundreds of billions of dollars to make sure we fill the forms out right or should we stick with a simpler code that does not require that additional cost?"
At the moment, yes, we do need it.
If you have a plan that can provide a safety net for those left behind by market forces then let me in on it and I'll revise my answer to no.
why do all the chicks in these CFP videos try to make their voices deeper when they talk? their voices make that croaking, creaking sound, particularly when they say words with the letter "O" in them, like when she says "internal revenue code" at the beginning of the video.
The Fair tax would eliminate EVERY other tax - and there are hundreds. It is the most simplistic and easy to implement of any othe taxing idea out there. It would not hurt the poor - it would tax the rich more. It would save this country hundreds of billions in tax enforcement alone.The collection methods are already in place and being used by the majority of states. It is just so SIMPLE and FAIR - really fair
Every time the tax code gets more complicated, the government creates more jobs. Accountants and tax professionals are a waste of resources. No tax code, no tax accountants, lawyers, collectors, etc... That's why the government will never abolish the income tax. The fact that our tax system is so terrible is what's keeping all those guys at HRBlock employed.
There is no incentive for politicians to abolish the IRS. We actually own nothing and they know this. If you do not comply they may do whatever is necessary to get their money without any due process. Inherit a family farm & you must pay a tax, but if you can't they take the farm. How special. My family owned a farm in NY and lost it during the depression to the IRS. Do you think they cared that no one had a job? Dupont now has a corporate headquarters there.
@aruba91961 You are so right about what you say. Despite what some believe that we do not need a government - we will always need a form of government. We would not last long in the world without one. But all these wars and all these taxes are not making any of us rich. Only the super rich get richer. The Fair Tax eliminates the inheritance Tax and the Property tax.....and all other taxes. Once again we would actually own the property that we paid for and could never lose it because of taxes.
The Fed & IRS corrupts crony politicians with power to borrow, debase & spend to buy “support” from Special Interest Groups, Unions, “Too Big to Fail” Corporations, the Military-Industrial Complex & Wall Street cartel.
Central Banking w/Fiat Debt-Currency & Fractional Reserve Banking gave birth to histories most evil political trends via central economic planning despotism.
Watch: “Money As Debt Full HQ Video” here on YouTube
Excellent. She spoke my mind! Its so complex that I have to hire an accountant to do it and IRS on top have their own who find errors! (remove those jobs!) Theres tons of paperwork, forms. I want to pay and pay on time, just dont make it difficult for me to pay, make it easy.
There is no Government of the People its all about Corporations & Zionist Banks Gangster Gov. America is the NWO the UN declaring war without a Congressional Approval under the constitution. Obama broke this Law & nothing said not a word. But don't you run them Camera lights at intersections. Folks its a War on You
@geo6892000 There's no fair way to tax someone. Taxation is always going to be the act of one class stealing wealth from another. It's never going to be 'fair'.
@Hostile Taxation is a necessary evil if we want any government at all - and we do. Look up the Fair Tax and what it means - you will change your mind about it - it really is the only fair way to do it
@geo6892000 Google "the fair tax fraud" for the free market response. The problem isn't that taxation isn't fair, it's that taxation is theft. I work hard for my money and it belongs to ME. Anyone who tries to take it by force is a thief, whether they work for the government or the mafia.
YOU want government, but at the expense of the people who would be it's victims. If government is so great, make taxes voluntary. Then we'll see who really wants it.
The cost of the IRS is criminal, not to mention the grief it causes each citizen. Also the mistakes and waste they are responsible for is criminal but nothing seems to happen over it. They have literally raped us this year. Our country needs a major overhaul from all the corruption that has seeped in since 1913. Why the progressives do not get it is driving the rest of us crazy, because due to this lack of understanding, they will take all of us down with their world view.
Nice presentation. I truly hope that the majority of American's will begin to understand the things you've talked about here so we can abolish the IRS and restore the freedom to own property (income) without having it confiscated at gunpoint as we do now. Hopefully this video will go viral, even if some are just watching because you look good. There is something very attractive about a beautiful, intelligent woman. At least they will hear the message. lol
OK, all the people being like "you're so hot, I'm not even listening to what you're talking about!" are dumbasses. The value of a female isn't determined by her physical appearance, so stop being such chauvinistic assholes, and either 1) learn about how the IRS sucks, or 2) go somewhere else to stare at girls; there are no shortage of them on the internet.
You're still making the argument from slavery. The answer isn't to reform the tax code. The answer is to abolish it. Only slaves debate and extrapolate new more effective, efficient ways to have their money taken from them (at gunpoint) and spent in ways, on things, to which they don't consent. If you're not a slave, you don't change the way your money is stolen from you. You stop your money being stolen from you. That's freedom. That's dignity.
@CFPEcon101 I am a fan of this series. I hold an economics degree and consider myself from the Austrian school of thought. One thing that should have been up front on your board was the fact that the income tax is NOT apportioned by congress. Therefore it is unconstitutional. AND> that there is not one single law on the books that require you to file. AND> that every last dime collected in income taxes goes directly to the Federal Reserve to pay the interest on the debt. No allocation to Gov.
@ElDukerino1 You are essentially right. But while both a flat or marginal tax rate would be extremely less complex than our current system it should be noted when comparing the two a flat tax is less complicated than a marginal one as a flat tax only deals with 1 percentage, whereas a marginal tax rate has more than one. Whether this is good is debatable. But whether there is difference in the level of complexity is clear. A flat tax requires fewer bits of information to characterize it.
The complexity difference for this is meaningless...anyone who pushes for a flat tax rate (which is exactly what is being done here) under the rubric of "the onerous compliance cost of the internal revenue code" is uncredible & disgraceful to say the least.
You're right that the flat vs marginal rate is debatable whether or not it is good.
@ElDukerino1 Indeed it is good that the difference in complexity between a flat tax and simple marginal tax is so small. Everyone capable of speaking will be capable of understanding either. We will see with time were society heads.
In Sweden you file your taxes using a four page document that is already filled in automatically. Most people can file their tax return just by sending a text message to the Swedish IRS.
@gnuochtapir One of the issues is that the tax code is used as a tool to influence behavior rather than just collect revenues. For example, if the government wants more people to play sports they will add a tax credit to the code to encourage people to do that. This can, over time, make the code very complicated.
The only point i can agree with her on is we need to trim the tax code done. Flat taxes help the rich and hurt the poor(or at least the not very rich), as if we say X dollars a year if you make y amount money will likely be a lot of money to those who make Y, but nothing to those who make 2Y...Or even less to those who make 3Y, or 4Y....
This is so informative. And the speaker is so intelligent!! Isn't she intelligent, everybody? So smart... and talented, too! I would love to learn more from such a brilliant young lady.
Can someone please tell me her name? I want to translate and subtitle this video and I need to be able to put something accurate when she says her name :) I've replayed it a million times and still can't get it!
divided amoral "americans" are being conquered on a daily basis. slaughtered, unfree american chickens. CNN controled, unable to unite-get together-form up- close ranks- agree on anything, weak amoral americans. jerry springer loving nutcase white americans divided, helpless, weak.
The purpose of the IRS has never been to raise money to run our Federal Government. That must first be fully understood, before this situation can ever be corrected. The IRS is a TOTAL LIE. Look at the "big picture." Tax money only pays interest to the Federal Reserve Bunko, Incorporated (which is totally unnecessary, and actually un-Constitutional). PLUS, the information provided by small businesses is used to guide giant corporations into new profitable ventures, and tax the originals.
@BeKoolFool you keep the illegal IRS legal by being a coward and not standing up.... you and MILLIONS of other coward amoral american chickenshits who literaly cant stand up. dont have the guts .arent able. too busy wont do it. not today. my 80 yo mommy is sick, Im too scared,.....chickenshit coward americans IRS LOVES you.
whoami1177, Do the hot women in your trailer park not discuss economics? What she is saying is the college educated answer to what your baby mamma asks when she wonders why she doesn't have enough money for a case of beer after she buys her cigarettes and chewing tobacco. This lady that you are seeing, is what you might have achieved if you would have read books instead of coloring in them.
A fair tax or flat tax is not the answer. All a flat tax will do is increase the cost of goods and decrease the productivity. First cut spending, I mean big time. Second we need to end the Federal Reserve and Central Banking system. We could do without an icome tax and a flat tax if we keep government to its limited and proper role!
Good video until you started promoting the flat tax, I knew it was coming, either that or a fair tax promo. The flat tax is not flat and the fair tax is not fair. How about abolish the income tax along with the IRS and replace it with nothing. Also, massively reduce govt spending on the warfare/welfare state.
This is exactly why so many Americans now want to scrap the IRS and the current tax systems and replace it all with the Fair Tax Check it out and get the book at fairtax dotorg Its fantastic and will put an end to the Polititians in Washington pitting Americans against each other with Class Warfare
You are worried about a government run health care system (not that that's what we got from Obama, actually far from it) because of the irs having a 12 min wait time to talk...have you ever tried to talk to a private cable company, private insurance, credit card company or any privately run utility co. for that matter? 12 min...I wish.
Amen! Amen! Amen! I own a few humble rental units. Dealing with IRS is my toughest management task, taking up most of Feb thru April plus $500 to the preparer. People with divorces or relocations spanning more than one year face exceptional complications There should be a web site for gathering and posting similar costs and complaints from the population at large.
You have no clue. The health care system isn't government run; that would have been only if the government owned the hospitals and insurance industry neither of which was in the bill. Regulating an industry does not equal government run. If it did then everything in the U.S. could be considered government run. You're hot, that's the only reason they had you do this video.
@sdspecto How is the government not running the system when they can set any arbitrary rule they deem necessary? It doesn't matter if a government employee is directly running the company, they can use regulation to bend that company to their will. The government does have the ability to run everything in the US through regulation if they so chose, the fact that they only implement regulation in some areas and not in others is irrelevant when they can do so arbitrarily.
@VeryGreatMan They can't do so arbitrarily. That's why we have laws in this country. We can't control executive pay for companies who didn't take bailout money. Currently we can't even make derivatives transparent... until we pass a law. Some laws may be silly but that doesn't mean all of them are.
@sdspecto What control can laws have on those who make them? The government uses rules, regulations, and taxes to change the market in a way that benefits their own self-interest. While the participants of the free market may also look to benefit their own self interest, but no private company can legally come to your house, stick a gun in your face, and demand you buy their product. Government is a necessary evil and should itself be regulated and constrained to the fullest possible extent.
@VeryGreatMan We elect people in order to change things we don't agree with, that's how we control the government. Personally I want term limits to get rid of personal interests in politics. Sure, regulate government, but not at the expense of letting the free market take over our country.
people can you seriously stop? a beautiful woman can also be intelligent. shes good for more than sex, so when you comment "tits or gtfo" or similar, it is pretty offensive. its the equivalent of saying: "i dont give a shit about what youre saying, i just watched this video bcz i want to bone you." yeah thats really what this girl was looking for when she posted this video. she doesnt want to screw your tiny dick.
Tax systems have become so complicated because of big-business-big-money-lobbyist that corrupt our democratic system. It's not the pure politicians themselves, it's special interest money that bribes politicians to get those difficult articles in tax laws that makes their tax deductions possible
schlecksi69 1 week ago
amazingly hot & smart...wow!
suitabledude 2 weeks ago
AWESOME outstanding!!!!
bootiack 2 weeks ago
dude... i think she's a stripper. not joking, i think i gave her a dollar.
EastBishopEye 1 month ago
I'll smash that babe.
knowthetruth1492 1 month ago
how u doin ;)
MrJohny360 2 months ago
Asking the government to fix this mess is like asking the burglar to protect a house....when the fuck will we wake up and do something.
DeviantFormula 2 months ago 3
Thanks for using a cute girl. So that important videos get 4 times as many views as they normally would
scrhamblin 3 months ago 5
@scrhamblin Im learning so much economics, I love these cute girls
thirdeyeblind3 1 month ago
RON PAUL OR BUST. 2012.
DramaBlock 4 months ago
If this woman is the future of the American economic academia, then God help you all.
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
@thetrueprometheus - I sure hope she is. That was more common sense in five minutes than what you typically see in a year's worth of congressional hearings.
StateExempt 4 months ago
@StateExempt Yeah, if you're a multimillionaire, everything she says absolutely stands to reason, let the leaders of the corporatocracy we live in do absolutely anything they like with no restraint nor accountability, but what about the other ninety nine per-fucking-cent of us?
When ninety nine percent of the population exist to service one percent, and you have a glorified hooker using her tits to successfully sell this economic nonsense as something laudable, we're a sorry lot indeed.
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
@thetrueprometheus - What does any of that have to do with the fact that the cost of IRS regulatory compliance is greater than that of the FBI and CIA?
But since you brought up that one percent...
watch?v=tAn8qK6W6fs
StateExempt 4 months ago
It's ridiculous that the IRS costs more than the FBI and CIA combined?
Where the fuck do you think the money to pay for the FBI and CIA comes from you dim wit?
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
@thetrueprometheus - I would think that collecting money would be less troublesome than spying on the world as a whole but I guess this makes me a "dim wit..."
StateExempt 4 months ago
Comment removed
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
@StateExempt The fact that you fail to grasp the fundamentals of where Government money comes from is evidence that you have room in your head for a three piece suite, yes.
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
@thetrueprometheus - By all means, educate us as to what these fundamentals are as well if not better than the speaker in this vid.
StateExempt 4 months ago
@StateExempt - It's quite simple. Any Government money comes from the people in the form of tax revenue. Governments don't have money, the public infrastructure belongs to the people. If you want a military, a health service that provides universal coverage, a Federal Reserve to bail out your Financial Sector when it fucks up, a transport network, a Police Force et cetera, then you have to pay tax.
In order to process this tax, you need to have an Inland Revenue Service, and since that deals
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
with collection of tax money from three hundred million people, one would expect it to require a far larger bureaucracy than a single Government project like the FBI.
Now, let's analyze what balloon tits is saying here step by step.
The IRS is bad because people have to submit a tax return once a year. Boo fucking Hoo. Welcome to paradise. That happens to most people in every civilized nation on Earth.
The IRS has immense power to destroy people's lives? Hyperbole. A stupid argument from
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
emotion. You all expect a policeman to come running every time your in trouble, you all expect public infrastructure to be maintained, so where does balloon tits suggest the money for this come from if not the IRS? Oh, that's right, she doesn't. She rubbishes the IRS and offers no alternative.
I'm a college student, she says. She isn't even qualified yet. She then admits that filling in a tax return is too complicated for her. My three year old niece could handle it for fuck's sake.
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
Next piece of mendacity. Obama has not put the IRS in charge of running a Government healthcare system. The healthcare system in the USA is run by private firms. Balloon tits doesn't even have her basic facts right.
People who call up the IRS have to hold the line for twelve minutes? Oh diddums! Times are hard!
The IRS provides inaccurate information millions of times every year? What a vague, wooly, half baked statement. No proof, no citations to a statistical source. She's bloody
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
lucky I'm not marking her presentation. It's one of the poorest I've ever seen. No real information, just a blatant appeal to the general laziness of the populace.
The tax code is a "nightmare"? Is she for fucking real? Subjective opinions do not belong is this kind of presentation. This girl is on an intellectual par with Sarah Palin.
The compliance graph at 3:50 is another piece of lunacy. It stands to reason that large corporations are going to have to spend more money on compliance
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
than households. A large corporation is many orders of magnitude more complex to run than a household.
To sum up, she makes a lot of sweeping generalizations about how a flat tax would be great for the people, solve all of America's social ills and clean up the political system. She gives no explanation of how she arrives at this conclusion.
To sum up, she's very pretty, but she is incapable of structuring and critiquing an argument. This presentation gets an F.
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
@thetrueprometheus - She suggests that those things should be funded by a tax code much simpler than the one we have now that does not consist of thousands of pages that IRS agents themselves are not fully familiar with.
Once again, is our tax code too complex or not?
StateExempt 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@StateExempt "Once again, is our tax code too complex or not?"
Probably not. I'm sure out of all the thousands of pages she talks about, there will be very few that apply to the average person's tax return.
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
@thetrueprometheus - While I think everything you mention could be provided by user fees only, you are still missing the point.
Should we have a multi-billion dollar cost of compliance on top of the cost of paying the actual taxes themselves?
StateExempt 4 months ago
@StateExempt Well, in actual fact she barely addresses compliance in any meaningful way in the video. If she perhaps elaborated on why the cost of compliance was so eye wateringly high and how it could be streamlined and executed more efficiently, I might happen to agree with her, but the crux of her presentation seems to be that there should be a reduction in taxation, which is already lower than it has been since the depression. Lowering taxes comes with social costs that affect us all.
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
@thetrueprometheus - Let me give you a hint:
- The tax code we have now is thousands upon thousands of pages long and growing.
- Instead of one that takes so much of our time (google "Compliance Costs & Tax Complexity" to see just how much), why not reduce the complexity of the code so that we don't spend billions of hours and billions of dollars making sure we comply with each rule in our current code?
StateExempt 4 months ago
@StateExempt "While I think everything you mention could be provided by user fees only, you are still missing the point."
The problem with doing things that way is that you then have to pay unemployed people enough benefit money to pay all the end user fees for such things as medical treatments they need and public infrastructure they have to use. That would end up being more expensive.
Unless of course you want to be like Joe Stalin and let people left behind by the system die?
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
@thetrueprometheus - Forget Stalin, this is my basic worldview about how assistance to the poor is presently flawed: watch?v=PGMQZEIXBMs
StateExempt 4 months ago
@thetrueprometheus - You still have yet to address her original point that you took issue with, namely that the cost of regulatory compliance with the IRS is more than the FBI and CIA.
Not that I think the things you listed are necessarily provided by regional sovereigns, but that is an unrelated issue.
StateExempt 4 months ago
@StateExempt I did address it. Nice things like public infrastructure and social inclusion cost money, ergo we need Inland revenue services to collect it. This service requires organization and that costs money.
All her suggestion of flat tax does is insure that the income of rich people will grow at a higher rate than it does now while that of ordinary people will not keep pace with inflation. That is in fact already happening since the onset of the GFC, and a flat tax will exacerbate it.
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
Her presentation demonstrates no understanding of basic economic principles. It appears to have completely escaped her notice that the USA is facing a budget deficit that is greater than the entire GDP of any of the developed nations except China and Japan. To drastically reduce the amount of income the Government have to tackle this would be utter madness.
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
@thetrueprometheus - I can agree the current budget is far too large to even be paid for:
watch?v=661pi6K-8WQ
For this reason we should cut spending to solve that problem given that there is not even enough capital to extract to pay for the current budget.
StateExempt 4 months ago
@StateExempt We need a radical rethink. We need to open new sectors and start producing stuff again, employing our own people rather than propping up China and Malaysia's economies.
The current generation of politicians we have in power in the USA and Europe inspire me with no confidence that we can do this.
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
@thetrueprometheus - Once again, you ignore the main point of the vid which was NOT about paying taxes in general, but the cost of COMPLYING with the current code as is.
Raising revenue and complying with thousands of pages of tax code that requires a multi-hundred billion dollar industry (liberty tax, turbo tax, etc) to comply are two different things.
StateExempt 4 months ago
@thetrueprometheus - A flat tax ensures everyone pays the same percentage of their income to the IRS, what is so undesirable about that?
StateExempt 4 months ago
@StateExempt What is undesirable about that is that if you're a low waged worker it will take you below the poverty line. Even Adam Smith approved of progressive taxes. Even Milton Friedman of all people agreed with negative income tax for those on low wages.
It is not reasonable that someone who struggles to make ends meet should pay the same percentage of income in tax as someone who has much more than he or she needs.
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
@StateExempt So yeah, it's more than the FBI or the CIA.
I would expect it to cost more than them, and it should cost more than them as it requires a feat of far greater organization to achieve.
She says that the Inland Revenue costs more than the CIA and FBI as if that actually means something. A bottle of Jim Beam costs more than a tube of toothpaste. So fucking what?
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
@thetrueprometheus - "A bottle of Jim Beam costs more than a tube of toothpaste. So fucking what?"
What we have is a situation in which the toothpaste costs more than the Jim Beam, which is what she is criticizing in the first place.
The cost of filing out paperwork should not exceed two intelligence agencies combined, and for the third time, that is not the same thing as actually raising revenue in general.
StateExempt 4 months ago
@StateExempt Why not?
Running intelligence services requires far less man power and organization than collecting three hundred million people's taxes.
It's a stupid comparison. It's like comparing spark plugs with mp3 players. It sounds dramatic, but on any kind of examination of what it actually tells you, it's irrelevant. It tells you nothing.
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
@thetrueprometheus - It shouldn't. Not if all you are doing is collecting a "fee."
We spend in excess of $300,000,000,000 per year (to companies like Liberty Tax and what have you) making sure our payment complies with the massive tax code we have now. That averages out to roughly a thousand dollars per person per year to pay a "fee."
Do you think we could do better than the nearly 75,000 page long tax code we have now?
StateExempt 4 months ago
@StateExempt I don't think there would be any harm in simplifying the tax system, but thinking that a flat tax is going to solve America's social problems is, to put it mildly, stupid.
I would also like to see some proof, a link to statistical sources, that further explains this asserted figure of three hundred billion.
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
@thetrueprometheus - To be honest, I am a little mixed in opinion myself about what type of tax system we ought to move to even though I think there is massive room for improvement from the one we have.
The $300,000,000,000 figure comes from the cumulative revenue in the tax assistance industry. It is money spent by groups and individuals to firms like Liberty Tax to make sure they have complied with the nearly 75,000 page tax code.
I am betting most of those rules are cronyism by design.
StateExempt 4 months ago
@StateExempt Franky, I don't disagree with you on that. Not at all... If The systemic problems in the USA are anything like the EU, and I know damned well that they are, you'll be living under a bloated, self serving bureaucracy that is rife with corruption and cronyism.
When people like this girl in the video talk about small Government though, they aren't talking about eliminating inefficiency, they're talking about having a state that doesn't tax and doesn't do anything for anyone.
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
@thetrueprometheus The thing with the three hundred billion figure, I don't think it was all that clear on phase. Is it over a year? Ten years?
If over a year, that means it costs a thousand dollars per person in the USA to do a tax return. I find that very hard to believe. Even in the UK our system is nowhere near that risibly ineffective. If it really is that bad, it's not a flat tax you need, it's jail sentences for the people in charge of the fiasco.
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
@thetrueprometheus - The figure was for one year and it increases slightly with each passing year.
StateExempt 4 months ago
@thetrueprometheus - The girl specifically is not talking about a totally tax-free society per se, but you are right to say she wants government to be smaller than it is now.
I think we agree enough already on cronyism in the code itself though. If 75,000 pages are needed to explain collecting revenue, I sense corruption. There is a documentary called "An Inconvenient Tax" that has people from Noam Chomsky to Ron Paul all giving their critiques of the current system but I have yet to see it.
StateExempt 4 months ago
@StateExempt - Agreed. That is definitely a common trick used in political whitewashes. If there is a detail that certain people would like to keep hidden, they embed it in a single paragraph of a two hundred page report, most of which is dry waffle that puts the reader to sleep.
I believe in a large Government that takes care of it's people's needs. If the Government can't do that, we'd be as well not having one at all. I guess this is a debate that we'll always be on opposite sides of.
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
@thetrueprometheus I think the idea that government, large,or small, exists to take care of it's peoples needs is antithetical to the American system. My general understanding of our constitutions purpose is that it was written in order to protect the individual rights of the citizenry that they may pursue their lives...
59arkady 3 months ago
@59arkady The idea that government should have no duty to serve and represent the people who elected it only really came about with Reagan.
In the post war era, it was taken as given that Government had a duty to serve and represent the people under it's jurisdiction.
thetrueprometheus 3 months ago
@thetrueprometheus Please substantiate.
59arkady 3 months ago
@59arkady Your ignorance of who was running the country when the Government abrogated responsiblilty for acting as a regulator of market forces is not my concern.
Surely you must know what Reaganomics is? If not, and you want a political history lesson, I suggest you consult google. That is what the Web is for.
thetrueprometheus 3 months ago
@thetrueprometheus - Yes or no: Do we really need a tax code that requires an industry costing us hundreds of billions of dollars to make sure we fill the forms out right or should we stick with a simpler code that does not require that additional cost?
StateExempt 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@StateExempt "Yes or no: Do we really need a tax code that requires an industry costing us hundreds of billions of dollars to make sure we fill the forms out right or should we stick with a simpler code that does not require that additional cost?"
At the moment, yes, we do need it.
If you have a plan that can provide a safety net for those left behind by market forces then let me in on it and I'll revise my answer to no.
thetrueprometheus 4 months ago
If you're an individual working as an employee in the US and paying tax on what you earn, you need to see this : /watch?v=lUpZhhbKUBo
Sy3m 4 months ago
these videos conform to three stereotypes of republican/conservative mindset
1. Big government is bad, regulations are bad
2. Fiscal responsibility is a good thing
3. You cannot explain the first two points without a hot chick who can give you a raging hard on
MrLoveallhatenone 4 months ago
why do all the chicks in these CFP videos try to make their voices deeper when they talk? their voices make that croaking, creaking sound, particularly when they say words with the letter "O" in them, like when she says "internal revenue code" at the beginning of the video.
also, improper use of "culminating" at the jump.
madbowler6 5 months ago
Garbage in, garbage out. Whoever is paying for this shill is making boatloads. Cute and t-shirt don't fool me.
piechart503 6 months ago
she is hot and knows her stuff, double bonus
partyhouse88 7 months ago
the only reason i watched this video was because of her, i have absolutely no idea what she said in those 5:11 minutes..
mvs13I2 8 months ago
The Fair tax would eliminate EVERY other tax - and there are hundreds. It is the most simplistic and easy to implement of any othe taxing idea out there. It would not hurt the poor - it would tax the rich more. It would save this country hundreds of billions in tax enforcement alone.The collection methods are already in place and being used by the majority of states. It is just so SIMPLE and FAIR - really fair
geo6892000 9 months ago
Every time the tax code gets more complicated, the government creates more jobs. Accountants and tax professionals are a waste of resources. No tax code, no tax accountants, lawyers, collectors, etc... That's why the government will never abolish the income tax. The fact that our tax system is so terrible is what's keeping all those guys at HRBlock employed.
longaugust 9 months ago
There is no incentive for politicians to abolish the IRS. We actually own nothing and they know this. If you do not comply they may do whatever is necessary to get their money without any due process. Inherit a family farm & you must pay a tax, but if you can't they take the farm. How special. My family owned a farm in NY and lost it during the depression to the IRS. Do you think they cared that no one had a job? Dupont now has a corporate headquarters there.
aruba91961 10 months ago
@aruba91961 You are so right about what you say. Despite what some believe that we do not need a government - we will always need a form of government. We would not last long in the world without one. But all these wars and all these taxes are not making any of us rich. Only the super rich get richer. The Fair Tax eliminates the inheritance Tax and the Property tax.....and all other taxes. Once again we would actually own the property that we paid for and could never lose it because of taxes.
geo6892000 9 months ago
Infernal Raping System
The Fed & IRS corrupts crony politicians with power to borrow, debase & spend to buy “support” from Special Interest Groups, Unions, “Too Big to Fail” Corporations, the Military-Industrial Complex & Wall Street cartel.
Central Banking w/Fiat Debt-Currency & Fractional Reserve Banking gave birth to histories most evil political trends via central economic planning despotism.
Watch: “Money As Debt Full HQ Video” here on YouTube
End The Fed!
yakyakyak69 10 months ago
Excellent. She spoke my mind! Its so complex that I have to hire an accountant to do it and IRS on top have their own who find errors! (remove those jobs!) Theres tons of paperwork, forms. I want to pay and pay on time, just dont make it difficult for me to pay, make it easy.
myfree77 10 months ago
We need to end this monstrosity known as the IRS, this evil institution has no place in a free society. Its an affront to the rights of man.
We need to abolish the IRS and institute the FairTax. Only then will we be truly free.
kurthanson2005 10 months ago
Americas Enemies:
1.THE IRS better known as Theirs.
2.Apac
3.Israel
4.The Federal Reserve Bank
5.All Federal Departments
6.DMV's
7.Government Employee Unions
And on & on
There is no Government of the People its all about Corporations & Zionist Banks Gangster Gov. America is the NWO the UN declaring war without a Congressional Approval under the constitution. Obama broke this Law & nothing said not a word. But don't you run them Camera lights at intersections. Folks its a War on You
WarDogLRS 10 months ago 5
@WarDogLRS
Apec? You mean Opec? And why is Israel on the list at all?
Illyrien 10 months ago
The answer is the 'Fair Tax' - not the 'flat tax'. There is a youtube video describing the 'Fair Tax'. It really is a fair way of doing things.
geo6892000 10 months ago
@geo6892000 There's no fair way to tax someone. Taxation is always going to be the act of one class stealing wealth from another. It's never going to be 'fair'.
Hostile 9 months ago
@Hostile Taxation is a necessary evil if we want any government at all - and we do. Look up the Fair Tax and what it means - you will change your mind about it - it really is the only fair way to do it
geo6892000 9 months ago
@geo6892000 Google "the fair tax fraud" for the free market response. The problem isn't that taxation isn't fair, it's that taxation is theft. I work hard for my money and it belongs to ME. Anyone who tries to take it by force is a thief, whether they work for the government or the mafia.
YOU want government, but at the expense of the people who would be it's victims. If government is so great, make taxes voluntary. Then we'll see who really wants it.
Evil is never "necessary", by the way.
Hostile 9 months ago
The cost of the IRS is criminal, not to mention the grief it causes each citizen. Also the mistakes and waste they are responsible for is criminal but nothing seems to happen over it. They have literally raped us this year. Our country needs a major overhaul from all the corruption that has seeped in since 1913. Why the progressives do not get it is driving the rest of us crazy, because due to this lack of understanding, they will take all of us down with their world view.
Nefertitidancer 10 months ago
@Nefertitidancer You were literally RAPED by the IRS this year!? Are you sure you don't mean the IMF? Cos I hear that happens.
Hostile 9 months ago
Excellent video! You've even appear to have gotten the attention of some politicians, the scumbags with the inappropriate comments!
meandean222 10 months ago
Nice presentation. I truly hope that the majority of American's will begin to understand the things you've talked about here so we can abolish the IRS and restore the freedom to own property (income) without having it confiscated at gunpoint as we do now. Hopefully this video will go viral, even if some are just watching because you look good. There is something very attractive about a beautiful, intelligent woman. At least they will hear the message. lol
majesticmalfeasance 10 months ago
Some of you dummies act as if you've never seem a girl before.
This type of 5th level stupidity is why we are in this mess.
sirhcskoorb 10 months ago
Wow! I imagined that the costs of maintaining such an ineffective organization were high, but not that high!
Good job presenting the information.
yooyanks 10 months ago 3
1913, the year the American dream died, and the freedom was destroyed.
Joe11Blue 11 months ago
OK, all the people being like "you're so hot, I'm not even listening to what you're talking about!" are dumbasses. The value of a female isn't determined by her physical appearance, so stop being such chauvinistic assholes, and either 1) learn about how the IRS sucks, or 2) go somewhere else to stare at girls; there are no shortage of them on the internet.
nabilhentabli 11 months ago 3
Mmm taxes... that's hot
Trimbler00 11 months ago
If you economists are as hot as the girls in these videos, then I'm here for the gangbang!
DanielJohnLeahy 11 months ago
I'm sorry, what's the topic about?
Doc418 11 months ago
You're still making the argument from slavery. The answer isn't to reform the tax code. The answer is to abolish it. Only slaves debate and extrapolate new more effective, efficient ways to have their money taken from them (at gunpoint) and spent in ways, on things, to which they don't consent. If you're not a slave, you don't change the way your money is stolen from you. You stop your money being stolen from you. That's freedom. That's dignity.
rfalfonse 1 year ago 18
@rfalfonse Wage slavery isn't freedom. Dancing for your sliver of the pie dignified.
leufious 7 months ago
So beautiful!
achalmers 1 year ago
@CFPEcon101 I am a fan of this series. I hold an economics degree and consider myself from the Austrian school of thought. One thing that should have been up front on your board was the fact that the income tax is NOT apportioned by congress. Therefore it is unconstitutional. AND> that there is not one single law on the books that require you to file. AND> that every last dime collected in income taxes goes directly to the Federal Reserve to pay the interest on the debt. No allocation to Gov.
SuperGuitarman69 1 year ago
Good video, until "so what's the answer" part.
FLAT vs. MARGINAL tax rates have ZERO to do with the complexity.
Nice try.
ElDukerino1 1 year ago
@ElDukerino1 You are essentially right. But while both a flat or marginal tax rate would be extremely less complex than our current system it should be noted when comparing the two a flat tax is less complicated than a marginal one as a flat tax only deals with 1 percentage, whereas a marginal tax rate has more than one. Whether this is good is debatable. But whether there is difference in the level of complexity is clear. A flat tax requires fewer bits of information to characterize it.
Brownyman 1 year ago
@Brownyman
The complexity difference for this is meaningless...anyone who pushes for a flat tax rate (which is exactly what is being done here) under the rubric of "the onerous compliance cost of the internal revenue code" is uncredible & disgraceful to say the least.
You're right that the flat vs marginal rate is debatable whether or not it is good.
ElDukerino1 1 year ago
@ElDukerino1 Indeed it is good that the difference in complexity between a flat tax and simple marginal tax is so small. Everyone capable of speaking will be capable of understanding either. We will see with time were society heads.
Brownyman 1 year ago
vote if you clicked because of her!!
ravercanada 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Real BBw wives online now naneedj.info
cheristessa 1 year ago
It is designed this way on purpose to control our lives and condemn us. Hell, al capone only conviction was tax evasion that landed him in prison!!
makun16 1 year ago
keep up the great work!
christianpainters 1 year ago 2
I think I was just staring instead of listening and only heard her voice.
flippyflappy1 1 year ago
To thing they are all gold digger is wrong,I would love to give my GF and her kids my tax dollar.
IRS = I(?) Rule Slaves(me)
SteveXnycperformance 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Be a part of Russian ladies community gettop5.info
makaylafrke 1 year ago
In Sweden you file your taxes using a four page document that is already filled in automatically. Most people can file their tax return just by sending a text message to the Swedish IRS.
The system in the US sounds mindboggingly stupid.
gnuochtapir 1 year ago 2
@gnuochtapir One of the issues is that the tax code is used as a tool to influence behavior rather than just collect revenues. For example, if the government wants more people to play sports they will add a tax credit to the code to encourage people to do that. This can, over time, make the code very complicated.
studentofsmith 1 year ago
Compliance Cost? Business entities?? WTH?????? THIS IS SOME BULL SHIT!!!
heartlessvietboy 1 year ago
If she wore some suitable clothes I'd actually listen to her. This is Hot For Words - Political Style.
UltraComboer 1 year ago
Im so scared because the tax code has so many words in it.
MihaiBorcan 1 year ago
She looked way hotter in the thumbnail. I thought she was Brazilian or something
PjPjPaul 1 year ago
The only point i can agree with her on is we need to trim the tax code done. Flat taxes help the rich and hurt the poor(or at least the not very rich), as if we say X dollars a year if you make y amount money will likely be a lot of money to those who make Y, but nothing to those who make 2Y...Or even less to those who make 3Y, or 4Y....
Kevashida 1 year ago
HIWA ALAGHEBANDIAN
jjmdirector 1 year ago
Her name is Hiwa Alaghebandian
charlienovak 1 year ago
Where do you guys find all these cute ladies to appear in your videos?
txgp17 1 year ago
phonetic pronunciation of her name "whowannacabandeein"
krossdriven1 1 year ago
This is so informative. And the speaker is so intelligent!! Isn't she intelligent, everybody? So smart... and talented, too! I would love to learn more from such a brilliant young lady.
CaptainCocaine 1 year ago
Can someone please tell me her name? I want to translate and subtitle this video and I need to be able to put something accurate when she says her name :) I've replayed it a million times and still can't get it!
LaissezFaireGR 1 year ago
@LaissezFaireGR : I don't know her name but it sounds like "Huanna Cabandian"
krossdriven1 1 year ago
There's an "L" somewhere in there... I'm sure I can hear it.
LaissezFaireGR 1 year ago
@LaissezFaireGR : Her first nae is "Hiwa" but I don't know what her last name is.
krossdriven1 1 year ago
The accountants are busy little beavers.
riverlioness 1 year ago
We vote for this shit.
ppaulst 1 year ago
that chick is hot , she can do my long form
FiatDollars 1 year ago
divided amoral "americans" are being conquered on a daily basis. slaughtered, unfree american chickens. CNN controled, unable to unite-get together-form up- close ranks- agree on anything, weak amoral americans. jerry springer loving nutcase white americans divided, helpless, weak.
MrHarry46 1 year ago
Would be a lot better if you were topless! :)
vtec350 1 year ago
All I have to say is that I did my part and voted Ron Paul in the primary..
CapumOfOuttaSpace 1 year ago 3
omg wow if your name wasn't a bunch of random noises you'd be perfect!
wohs145 1 year ago 4
can u b my teacher
FATBOYAKA12 1 year ago
The purpose of the IRS has never been to raise money to run our Federal Government. That must first be fully understood, before this situation can ever be corrected. The IRS is a TOTAL LIE. Look at the "big picture." Tax money only pays interest to the Federal Reserve Bunko, Incorporated (which is totally unnecessary, and actually un-Constitutional). PLUS, the information provided by small businesses is used to guide giant corporations into new profitable ventures, and tax the originals.
1tuuber 1 year ago
Our Tax system now = over 67,000 pages, Fair Tax Bill = under 200 pages! f a i r T a x . o r g
flmcon 1 year ago
With young folk like this - there is Hope For America
smokeyjoe08 1 year ago 2
study the Tom Cryer case... IRS is illegal
BeKoolFool 1 year ago
@BeKoolFool you keep the illegal IRS legal by being a coward and not standing up.... you and MILLIONS of other coward amoral american chickenshits who literaly cant stand up. dont have the guts .arent able. too busy wont do it. not today. my 80 yo mommy is sick, Im too scared,.....chickenshit coward americans IRS LOVES you.
MrHarry46 1 year ago
whoami1177, Do the hot women in your trailer park not discuss economics? What she is saying is the college educated answer to what your baby mamma asks when she wonders why she doesn't have enough money for a case of beer after she buys her cigarettes and chewing tobacco. This lady that you are seeing, is what you might have achieved if you would have read books instead of coloring in them.
EastCoastMarc 1 year ago
A fair tax or flat tax is not the answer. All a flat tax will do is increase the cost of goods and decrease the productivity. First cut spending, I mean big time. Second we need to end the Federal Reserve and Central Banking system. We could do without an icome tax and a flat tax if we keep government to its limited and proper role!
LibertyUnleashedTV 1 year ago
Good video until you started promoting the flat tax, I knew it was coming, either that or a fair tax promo. The flat tax is not flat and the fair tax is not fair. How about abolish the income tax along with the IRS and replace it with nothing. Also, massively reduce govt spending on the warfare/welfare state.
iFreedom4ever 1 year ago
Excellent ... you go girl !
harleyguy1958 1 year ago
yes, we need more hot economists
eccentricity00 1 year ago
This is exactly why so many Americans now want to scrap the IRS and the current tax systems and replace it all with the Fair Tax Check it out and get the book at fairtax dotorg Its fantastic and will put an end to the Polititians in Washington pitting Americans against each other with Class Warfare
MAVsays 1 year ago
She is really hot, but the message is still really relevant.
JMMoosey 1 year ago
Doign this video in a halter deafens the message.
bajoverga 1 year ago
you don´t need to take your shirt off.......stay civilized...
a fully transparent silikon dress would do the job also... !
peeforapie 1 year ago
Wow, this is a great argument for a simple flat tax.
Line 1: total income in cash from al sources.
Line 2: Total value of income in products, benefits or services.
Line 3: Number of dependants not claimed by anybody else.
Line 4: Standard deduction for one person to live times number of people.
Line 5: (Line 1 + Line 2 - Line 4) x 15%
bsabruzzo 1 year ago 2
Wow! Great job!
brandonlasvegas 1 year ago
Complex tax code and high costs? Ah, no kidding! How is this new??
drnone88 1 year ago
I'm in love. btw--What was she talking about?
mjdntn 1 year ago 7
i love this
SexCyberGuideCom 1 year ago
fuck taxes your hot damn!!
whoami1177 1 year ago 25
You are worried about a government run health care system (not that that's what we got from Obama, actually far from it) because of the irs having a 12 min wait time to talk...have you ever tried to talk to a private cable company, private insurance, credit card company or any privately run utility co. for that matter? 12 min...I wish.
jackal507 1 year ago
uhh... what did she say?
whooshx2 1 year ago 2
I just muted it and watched her talk.
artsuk 1 year ago
omg so pritty
mooioom09 1 year ago 2
pornstar who? will you be starring in 'who's nailin paylin pt 2' ?
supremevero 1 year ago
Amen! Amen! Amen! I own a few humble rental units. Dealing with IRS is my toughest management task, taking up most of Feb thru April plus $500 to the preparer. People with divorces or relocations spanning more than one year face exceptional complications There should be a web site for gathering and posting similar costs and complaints from the population at large.
jframp 1 year ago
It's difficult to pay attention if I'm staring at your boobs the whole time.
banido 1 year ago 3
She look like my ex-girlfriend, but smarter :o)
Alexvideoclip 1 year ago
Who needs money? It's only worth something when you part with it and i dont see much of that going on, do you?
onvarocks 1 year ago
The problem is everybody wants something, nobody wants to pay for it.
iversonmatthew 1 year ago
I wanna "tax' this chicks ass!
b00too 1 year ago
nice video of her,,,
why she use too much a makeup chair
bestamerica 1 year ago
why do we blindly follow people with so many presumptions
Senorclipit 1 year ago
You have no clue. The health care system isn't government run; that would have been only if the government owned the hospitals and insurance industry neither of which was in the bill. Regulating an industry does not equal government run. If it did then everything in the U.S. could be considered government run. You're hot, that's the only reason they had you do this video.
sdspecto 1 year ago
@sdspecto How is the government not running the system when they can set any arbitrary rule they deem necessary? It doesn't matter if a government employee is directly running the company, they can use regulation to bend that company to their will. The government does have the ability to run everything in the US through regulation if they so chose, the fact that they only implement regulation in some areas and not in others is irrelevant when they can do so arbitrarily.
VeryGreatMan 1 year ago
@VeryGreatMan They can't do so arbitrarily. That's why we have laws in this country. We can't control executive pay for companies who didn't take bailout money. Currently we can't even make derivatives transparent... until we pass a law. Some laws may be silly but that doesn't mean all of them are.
sdspecto 1 year ago
@sdspecto What control can laws have on those who make them? The government uses rules, regulations, and taxes to change the market in a way that benefits their own self-interest. While the participants of the free market may also look to benefit their own self interest, but no private company can legally come to your house, stick a gun in your face, and demand you buy their product. Government is a necessary evil and should itself be regulated and constrained to the fullest possible extent.
VeryGreatMan 1 year ago
@VeryGreatMan We elect people in order to change things we don't agree with, that's how we control the government. Personally I want term limits to get rid of personal interests in politics. Sure, regulate government, but not at the expense of letting the free market take over our country.
sdspecto 1 year ago
people can you seriously stop? a beautiful woman can also be intelligent. shes good for more than sex, so when you comment "tits or gtfo" or similar, it is pretty offensive. its the equivalent of saying: "i dont give a shit about what youre saying, i just watched this video bcz i want to bone you." yeah thats really what this girl was looking for when she posted this video. she doesnt want to screw your tiny dick.
its demeaning retard. next time, stfu or gtfo.
gingerrmo 1 year ago 3
@gingerrmo They can't there programmed to think that way about women.
Instrumentally 1 year ago