Healthyaddict.I want to Thank you for speaking out.I also live in Texas and the wildfire of Christianity is overpowering but with others like you willing to voice out your opinions we can make a difference.Thank you.
I myself find the seven project constitutionally quesionable, that coming from someone who supported/was sorta part of it in his Christian days. In particular, I question them doing the assembly during the school day to coerce the students to come to the brain-washing (er, I mean evangelizing) event that takes place in the evening. Hell, I hate proselytizing all together, but if you're going to do so, do so not during school hours and keep church and state separate.
Hey, all of you atheistic evolutards. Do you know that Ron Wyatt discovered Noah's ark, the Red Sea crossing site, the real Mount Sinai, the remains of Sodom and Gomorrah and more? You really should check out the evidence and stop being such government indoctrinated sheep. It is time that you start standing up like men and stop being such cowardly sheep.
@thechessstick Actually no he didn't Ron Wyatt is a fraud, he documents a piece of wood he claims to be from the ark, what was found that the piece of wood is actually about 10 years old, it was dosed in house hold chemicals and then seared to make it look very old, but Radiocarbon dating doesn't lie.
There isn't any evidence for anything of what you're saying.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Wow, you believe everything you read that agrees with your worldview, don't you? You are a perfect government-indoctrinated dolt. Try acting like a real man for a change and do some independent research.
@thechessstick Actually no, all of the world views agree with me. Your logic is poor and your coherency is completely lacking as you seem to only read things that agree with you, You read Ryan Wyatt's account for his findings, but failed to recognize all the contradicting accounts that debunked his findings.
How can you believe someone when they blatantly lied.
It was debunked the ark was just a rock sticking out of the ground National geographic did a whole thing debunking it with over an hour footage at the site. Sodom and Gomorrah is no more evidence for the bible than New York is for Spider-man or L.A. is of Ironman
@thechessstick Actually no he didn't he was found to be a fraud when the "wood" of the ark was actually an old looking piece of wood that had been fired and stained, it wasn't anywhere near 10 years old let alone 4000.
Well, what I think is that even if they are not overtly avangelizing to the students, any orginisation, no matter what there belifes are, will present there belifes if they are acting honestly.
There actions, policies, atitude, even the languedge they use will speak to what they belive. So perhaps the government just shuouldn't get involved with religius groups at all.
it should be simple - if they mention God or the church in any way, it's then that they break the law - if they just give the message of how to treat people, then it should be OK...
You have to remember that whenever a church gets "attacked" by an Athiest, or someone who doesn't believe what they do, then their being bullied, but it's perfectly OK for them to attack other people's beliefs and tell them that they're going to hell :-P
You atheists have as your god evolution. Anyone who has simply accepted the misinformation that the government indoctrination centers shovel into the unsuspecting head of children cannot come to the correct conclusion when it comes to origins. I call this process "evolutardation" and it is rampant. Another part of this indoctrination is the "puffing-up" mechanism that is used. That is the brainwashing technique that works on a person's pride and fear that makes them smug elitists (T.E.N.C).
@thechessstick "You atheists have as your god evolution"
That doesn't even make sense.
Science should be taught in science class. Full Stop.
You want to believe in God - go ahead - but students need to be educated - that's what schools are for. Churches, mosques and synagogues can teach you about what the holy books say.
Science is about reading the Book of the world - observing the actual world around us.
If you want the USA to remain a first world nation into the future you need science.
@richo61 That is right "science should be taught in the classroom". That is why evolution should not be taught. Get over it. Evolution is just a philosophy... a religion. It is the religion of atheists.
Human chromosome 2, Matching endogenous retro-viral sequences between the grate apes and humans,
recessive genes, tail muscle in humans, Progressive patterns in comparative
genes, Junk DNA, Single strain DNA.+multiple dating methods that agree with each other with an extremely low % margin of error when used correctly proving the earth is old enough for the time needed for macro change and
@TheMrgoku1985 Junk DNA!! LOL. ERV's! LOL. Dating methods that agree! LOL. You are a typical indoctrinated evolutard as well. You all have your own little club of misfits, though.
@TheMrgoku1985 LOL. The fossil record is actually a great testament to the Genesis account. If Noah's flood happened what would you expect to find? Answer>>> billions of dead things buried in rock layers laid down by water all of the Earth. And what do we find? Answer>>> billions of dead things buried in rock layers laid down by water all over the earth. And guess what! They have been hydrologically sorted!
Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus anamensis, Australopithecus afarensis, Kenyanthropus platyops, Australopithecus africanus, Australopithecus garhi, Australopithecus sediba, Australopithecus aethiopicus, Australopithecus robustus , Australopithecus boisei, Homo habilis, Homo georgicus, Homo erectus, Homo ergaster, Homo antecessor, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis, Homo floresiensis, Homo sapiens
@TheMrgoku1985 Hey, all of you atheistic evolutards. Do you know that Ron Wyatt discovered Noah's ark, the Red Sea crossing site, the real Mount Sinai, the remains of Sodom and Gomorrah and more? You really should check out the evidence and stop being such government indoctrinated sheep. It is time that you start standing up like men and stop being such cowardly sheep. There is some data for you!
@thechessstick no they haven't they're sorted according to the era in which they died.
These layers of rock have been cooking for millions and millions of years, these dinosaur fossils aren't fossils formed 4000 years ago.
Radio metric dating proves that all of these fossils are millions of years old, and rock actually takes a very long time to make, something not going to happen in 4000 years
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Radio-metric dating only provides more evidence of old age, but fossil assemblages were known to be quite old before that. Most fossil's aren't dated using radio-metric dating as you can't date a fossil directly. Methods of relative dating and absolute dating combined give the ages of fossils.
Our numbers are growing by the day. People are wising-up. They are heeding the little boy's cry of "The Emperor has no clothes on"! Evolution is the emperor and his missing clothes is the missing evidence.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD There you go. You are a typical atheistic evolutard. The Pioneer Anomaly gives us direct evidence that the speed of light increases outside the affect of the solar system. Try to get over your brainwashing and think outside of your government imposed box for a change.
@thechessstick WOW you pointed out a subject that can be explained by two RELATED theories.
this anomaly, after just typing it into google, and wikipedia. explains how this anomaly FURTHERED our scientific understanding of gravitational physics.
it did say how COSMOLOGY was suggested as an explanation but was later DISPROVED by scientists
the product of the equation studied did HINT at the explanation you suggest, but didn't hold any ground.
@thechessstick IN FACT after reading the ENTIRE article.
Not one mention was made about this anomaly providing any direct or even indirect evidence that the speed of light was slower outside of the solar system.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Of course it was not mentioned that the speed of light INCREASES outside of the solar system. This would rock the evolutionary paradigm too much. By the way, it does. This is actually the cause of the Pioneer Anomaly.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD I am sorry. I did not know that English is not your first language. Anyway, the evidence given to us by the Pioneer spacecraft give us direct empirical evidence that the speed of light increases outside of the solar system. This evidence is so plain and contrary to the constant-speed-of-light paradigm and to modern cosmological theory that it is called an "anomaly". Do try to get over your government imposed brainwashing that gives you your biases.
@thechessstick It is very clear to me and to others that you read about the "pioneer anomaly" from a very shallow source such as wikipedia and now you think you know every single thing about it. Sorry to burst your bubble, but you don't know anything. So if you want to not look like a complete idiot, you should shut up now.
Here is a question for you atheist dolts. What energy did the first protoplasmic blobs of "pre-life" use and by what mechanism did they harness it? It is questions like this one that has caused even some of the most ardent evolutionists to admit that there had to be an initial creation and therefore a Creator. They then still deny the God of the Bible because they don't want to conform their lives to His will. Wake-up and stop being such simpletons.
@thechessstick your question is almost ambiguous I'll explain it all.
There does not need to be a creator, there isn't any evidence of creation, this "prelife" you speak of isn't a term I can address, you're refering to the material before there was actually life, these are amino acids, RNA, and proteins. This is a very basic explanation of Abiogenesis, This is NOT related to evolution and is not considered in the study of evolution, you are mixing two subjects.
@thechessstick why is it that the first 5 papers I read have absolutely no affiliation to any outside approvals BUT the creationist website itself and other creationist constituents?
why is it that none of these have been accepted by anyone OUTSIDE of creationist constituents? such as oh say the scientific community?
And in fact, I did a little Ctrl F, and turns out less than 50 are actually about biology.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Sorry, I was just showing you some PhDs who are creationists. There are more and more every day, you know. And do you know what? If you are in Iran you won't find any papers written that are critical of Islam or Mohammud. Do you understand what I am saying. Islam controls the schools there and Satan controls the schools in the West.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD In the west if you let it be known that you are a creationist you lose your job at the University. I am hanging in there quite well, though!! Here I am a PhD at a major university and I am a young Earth creationist and they don't even know despite all of my students that I am persuading! LOL
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD LOL @ that. To even get a radiometric date you must first let those doing the dating know how old you think the specimen is. The whole method is total garbage. Do some research, really.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD LOL LOL LOL. Are you trying to be funny? I can give you example after example of radiometric dating being stupidly wrong. You really do need to watch a few Ron Wyatt videos. And also some A. E. Wilder-Smith ones.
@thechessstick Wow I read a website called wyattmuseum(dot)com/ron-wyatt.htm
It turns out Ron has NEVER been to turkey, and his discovery of Noaks ark is a complete fraud, the author shows how the wood of noahs ark was really just "He was a paid actor who had taken wood, soaked it in juice, and baked it in an oven to make it look old."
Wow you believe in some fraud? and you have a PhD in what exactly?
Now if you have a PhD, I should be able to find you in some PhD database? care to provide?
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD There are websites that say terrible things about Jesus, too. But you are an evolutionists. So, I am sure that you believe anything you hear that supports your bias without ever really checking out the facts. Wake-up and start being not only scientific but also noble.
@thechessstick Bias? I wrote an algorithm for evolution. I proved that evolution could be replicated using mathematical logic, I was not the first, loads of people did it before I did.
Also, there is NO evidence of jesus existing.
I observed a change in a rapidly changing bacteria.
scientists have observed Staph infection evolving into MRSA, being completely penicillin resistant.
they've also seen that an ape has 99.6% the same DNA as a human does.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Algorithms are mathematical in nature. They can be made to fit about anything. An ape has a very similar taxonomy to a human so of course its DNA would be very similar. Just like the blueprint for a Camaro is similar to a Z-28. That does not mean that there was any evolution just that they have a similar design. And, of course there is variation within a species, this is a design feature that allows creatures to adapt but there are limits. Keep studying.
@thechessstick Good one. Either you bearing false witness or maybe your Ph.D. is in Music. You clearly have no background or even a clue on anything science related.
I read the article “Does Distant Starlight Prove the Universe Is Old?” by Jason Lisle
he simply reads off the facts about the distant starlight from galaxies and then quotes a biblical verse that could be used as a metaphor relating to it from Psalm 19:1
he didn't do anything there, provides no counter evidence, and uses logical fallacies describing "assumptions" that are no longer assumptions and are in fact proven facts about light.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Do you know that no one know what the speed of light is outside of the Solar System? The speed of light in deep space may be infinite. One thing we do know is that it increases once outside of the Solar System.
the speed of light is CONSTANT, Nothing can exceed it, based on the equation mv/sqrt(c-v)
you cannot exceed this because in the denominator your v cannot be equal or greater than c, because you'd either be dividing by 0 or taking the square root of a negative number.
last sentence is not true, we do not know that, that is a lie, we know it is ALWAYS constant.
why do you think that NO particle has even exceeded or even met the speed of light?
remember those fancy neutrinos? they never did exceed it, it was an error that was not accounted for in the GPS satellite.
You obviously forget what a THEORY is, a theory is a set of explanation(s) that is supported by multiple counts of evidence and all fallible elements have been accounted for or disproved.
so please, you have a PHD and you don't even know what a theory is?
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD LOL. So now you have kept track of every particle that has ever existed and you know that not one of them has ever exceeded the speed of light. LOL
Hi, I hope your health is good. Do whatever you want,just don't hurt anyone.The Universe is yours , just take it. (Cain,my 999 plan is 50yrs. old). I am not trolling, it's
Superintendent was dishonest and evasive by her deliberate sidestepping of the religious agenda in this assembly. It's is not just about character building (what ever that means) but a fully acknowledged program of Christian evangelization (admittedly so). Would they be so eager to host a Muslim organization's character building program? I think not. Liars.
@rhabdoviridae Got that right. When Texas tried to secede, maybe we should've let them. Jesus.
Occasionally I see some Texan 'Tard with a "Don't Mess With Texas" shirt, and I think how much I want a shirt that says "Hey everyone! Let's fuck with Texas!"
@rhabdoviridae Haha thank you. I love my home - you know, Texas; the anus of the U.S. I do however truely dislike the small(slash)narrow mindedness I encounter...pretty much everywhere I go. -sigh- I love you Texas.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Actually, no on both counts. Try to get over the brainwashing that you received in the government indoctrination centers that you attended. Stand like a man for a change.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Wow, are you types deluded. The government absolutely promotes Darwinism/Evolutionism. You really need to read a few books by A. E. Wilder-Smith and try to get over that worldview that the government brainwashed you with.
@thechessstick I thought you were implying Atheism as in your first post, sorry for not clarifying that. And yes. The reason the (state) governments promote this is because it has loads of evidence for it, there has never been a discovery major or minor that demolishes or disproves evolution entirely. As far as all the papers I've read, there hasn't been any question that has been raised ever that makes evolution any less of a fact than it was yesterday.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Since Christianity is primarily the "problem" we face in North America, I think it's always appropriate to point out the sufficient evidence against their claim that the Earth is like 6,000 years old. I mean, come on. I don't see how this is paying respect to any higher power. it's like taking your logic and free-will and common sense and tossing it all out the window because of some words on a page. if some god exists, that would probably really piss him off.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD You are wrong on all counts. Ron Wyatt discovered Noah's ark. There is a visitor's center built at the site. Do try to get over the government brainwashing that you received in the government indoctrination centers that you attended. Try to stand like a man for a change. Don't be so effeminate.
@thechessstick are you just a troll? if you are being serious then i truly pity you. i hope for your sake you're just some kid trying to get a rise out of people, and not actually a guy in his 50's who is so clearly misled and unwilling to think for himself. you are accusing people of being brainwashed when you just spit out the same jargon again and again and again and again. "be a man for a change" you have said that 100 times at least, judging by the comments on your profile.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD LOL. Wow, no wonder you are an evolutarded government sheep. Of course there are going to be websites that war against Ron Wyatt! Check out his discoveries for yourself and stop being the easily manipulated sheep that you are. By the way, God brought the animals to the ark. He is able to do that because He is God. The animals then walked to their eventual homes. Don't you know that there were once kangaroos in other parts of the world? The Earth divided 120 after.
@thechessstick WOW GUESS WHAT GUYS? FORGET PHYSICS AND LAWS OF CONSERVATION I CAN JUST SAY GOD DID IT AND THAT JUST MAKES SENSE!
Seriously? you only believe this because a book says it? and you curb science to fit your agenda? and Actually no, he still didn't find it, it was all a hoax, I seriously went to the fifth page and all I found was were documentations of how it was a fraud and how he did it.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD LOL. God is God. He made the laws of physics. That means He is in control. If there are laws then there has to be a law-giver. Don't you even see that by your very statements that you prove the existence of God? Do try to start thinking outside of the government imposed box that you were forced into.
@thechessstick You obviously skew the word Law in "law of conservation" with Law as in Business Law.
In physics, the word Law is an unbreakable pact in nature, you CANNOT create or destroy matter or energy.
please before riticuling evolution, why don't you provide any evidence to anything you say.
simply saying "God did it" is an incredibly ignorant statement and completely anti-science, you disregard all other understandings of the universe to preserve your ignorance calling me a bigot
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Actually I have a great understanding of what a law is in science. I also know that these laws needed to be created. You really should read a few A. E. Wilder-Smith videos. A. E. Wilder-Smith terribly drubbed Dick Dawkins in origins debates. It is because of these drubbings that Dick Dawkins doesn't debate creationists anymore. You atheists are so simpleminded. It is quite sad, really.
@thechessstick actually no, laws do not need to be created, they are not vectors or scalar quantities.
and thanks for disregarding what the previous post was about, you totally didn't rebut anything except some how refuting some claim I didn't make about you not knowing anything about laws, which I didn't say
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Classic idiot creationist tactic, change subjects while making outrageous claims and insulting language. Most respond by trying to clear up those claims while lapsing out of the original argument, kudos for not falling for it.
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD You are right. I cannot create or destroy matter. But guess what... God can. He is the Creator. Where did the matter for your little "big bang" come from? And where did the energy come from? And where did space come from? Get over it. God is God.
@thechessstick I didn't say you could or couldn't create matter.
You should know that the net energy of the entire universe is 0, so if you add all the energy up, it will be zero.
Also you should know is that Energy is a scalar quantity and has no direction.
Basically there is no need for a creator because the energy is not created, it is conserved. You have no evidence for god and saying 'well if you can't explain it then God did it'
@thechessstick hrmmm, which "government" are we talking about? have you listened to any of the republican candidates speak? it's all about God. I think you are thinking more about the education system, in which case evolution should be taught since it's the same as teaching about dinosaurs and other planets: it's science. and religion should be left out because of its ability to alienate and oppress the mind, oh and because there are dozens of religions and only one primordial goo.
@thechessstick I'm really confused by your insulting nonsense. Are you accusing me of being brainwashed by the church or brainwashed by evolutionists? If you took the time to read and attempt to comprehend what I've written, you should quickly notice that i'm not religious and I was pointing out how many visible people in government support the notion of a christian God and many others support evolution. you are simply ignorant and arrogant, making accusations. and also fuck you.
@BanThisChannel The religion that is taught in the government indoctrination centers is secular humanism and its "god" is evolution. If you are an atheist then you are a believer. The difference between you and a Christian is that you are believing an unsupported lie. By the way, Ron Wyatt discovered Noah's ark. Do try to escape the misinformation that was jammed into your head.
@thechessstick You remind me of one of the fat, nasty, homely bitches that THINK they're the cutest thing on the street. You clearly have no introspective ability whatsoever and are in denial about your own lack of intelligence. Please, take your tiny mind back to the television before you miss your cartoons or (your god forbid) the 700 Club.
@thechessstick are you a Christian accusing non-Christians of being brainwashed? dude, splash some water on your face and take a good, long look in the mirror. you are the embodiment of the intellectual failure you are accusing us of. also, way to show off some good Christian morals. you are clearly doing God's work!
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Are you saying that a "PRIVATE" institution could not be working for Satan? I mean assuming that Satan does exist, and I know that he does. Do you see what is wrong with your thinking? You are clearly given over to the worldview that was crammed into your head.
Infuriates me that people want to conflate education and religion. Classrooms should be purer places where the subject under investigation is studied without being influenced/tainted by these bronze-age ideas. Leave all that shit to Sunday school.
@LAnonHubbard indeed. although there is a notable difference between studying something and teaching something. Religions are worthwhile to study, but teaching them should have no place in our education system. the 2nd and 3rd year philosophy of religion classes that i've taken only strengthened and solidified my agnosticism, so I don't think there is any danger in studying and analyzing them. But if we're talking about teaching this stuff to a bunch of kids, it is undoubtedly wrong.
Can't Texas just secede from the U.S. already? One of my friends who I've known since high school moved down there earlier this year and I still for the life of me cannot understand why. We were talking on the phone the other day and he's miserable there. He's fed up with the lack of brain activity, it's driving him nuts. What can I say, I told him so.
@Robertz1986 I get what you're saying, however, if Texas broke off and became it's own country, then they wouldn't be poisoning the rest of the U.S. with it's ignorant and nonsensical bullshit. Like Texas trying to rewrite the history books to fit their batshit-nuts conservative aganda, trying to re-criminalize sodomy and homosexuality, the vicious attacks on women's reproductive rights, and that's just the stuff I can remember off the top of my head. A state like that has no place in the U.S.
Godless Jezebel! It's only fitting that you hold your satanic convention in the city of sin. Just kidding! I just found your channel today and I think you're great. I'm agnostic and I think atheists are just as silly as theists, but I always like to debate the finer points of reality as we know it. If you read these comments, I'd love to hear why you choose atheism over agnosticism. As I said on your other video, I really think agnosticism is the only logical choice for a modern human being.
@BanThisChannel How is atheist just as silly? Do you see proof in God? I sure as hell don't. I'm not going to believe in God on a lack of evidence. That's called faith, and it's for the stupid.
@MetalxXxMayhem It's just as silly because, in a universe as vast and as unexplored as ours, with new discoveries every day even here on our planet, and with more mysteries than the human race will ever uncover before our sun burns out, atheists claim to know whether or not God or any sort of higher being exists. Demanding evidence is one thing, agnostics do that too, but asserting that there DEFINITELY is not a God is as silly as asserting that there DEFINITELY is one.
@rhabdoviridae no, it's as silly as asserting there is a god because both are factual claims on a subject we couldn't possibly understand. both are claims based on your own experience and your own BELIEF. asserting there are no leprechauns is easy because they are supposed to be little green-clad irishmen with magic powers and pots of gold. asserting there is no god, on the other hand, is more like asserting there are no aliens. it's simply illogical to make a definitive claim of "is" or "isn't"
@rhabdoviridae If, on the other hand, you are asserting that God isn't a bearded man on a throne in the sky, then maybe I can agree with you because there is absolutely no evidence to support that. the evidence to support a "higher" framework, a collective subconscious, and a power far beyond our understanding is much more substantial, so to rule out a higher power is, like i said, just plain stupid if you consider yourself thoughtful and observant. keeping an open mind limits you much less.
@BanThisChannel Do you mind me making an inquiry as to the specific supportive evidence for this "'higher' framework, a collective subconscious, and a power far beyond our understanding" you refer to? If there is sufficient empirical evidence to support the idea of a "higher power," then people will have reason to consider it valid, otherwise the idea can be ruled out pending sufficient evidence.
@Halestorm53 Of course! that's a very valid question, although it's easily answered. I'm not asserting that these things exist, the evidence i'm referring to is the simple and pure fact that they could exist. that's all that is required to make that statement. beyond that, however, there is empirical evidence to suggest unseen connectivity. by "higher framework" or "power" i'm not referring to some kind of deity, I'm making the claim that there is more going on than we understand.
@Halestorm53 Not only is agnosticism the most logical choice, it is also the "hardest" choice. Choosing what is real and what is true is very, very easy, whether you are asserting the positive or the negative. Remaining humble is always good, in a universe to vast and complex. when i say there is evidence to support a higher framework, connectivity, power beyond our understanding, i'm referring to intuition, to the unparalleled power of the human brain, and to the nature of the universe.
@Halestorm53 the empirical evidence that you rightly demand is all around you. all you need to know is that you don't know it all and probably never will. it's easy to take comfort in atheism, just as easy as (insert religion here), but that doesn't make it the most logical choice. logic demands that you remain humble in your perspective, as we are, without question, a tiny uneducated speck in a universe that we could literally never fully explore or understand.
@Halestorm53 sigh... feeling long-winded now, but finally: "ruling out" is asserting the negative. it means you have come to the conclusion that, based on lack of testable evidence you are 100% certain that ________. I know it's said again and again by theists clinging desperately to their beliefs, but you require evidence if you want to make a definitive claim like that. both atheists and theists require evidence, just as agnostics do, but agnostics don't make such definitive claims without it.
@Halestorm53 This is where the argument becomes moot and agnosticism becomes the clear logical choice. Atheists will never win the argument, because even if we opened up a big hatch at the end of the universe and found a giant gay dragon and his spaghetti monster husband, Christians or Muslims or whoever could still claim that their God is out there somewhere, and that the gay dragon was part of his divine plan. I like to think agnostics sit back, reflect on life a bit, and then laugh.
@MetalxXxMayhem also every argument for atheism i've come across is nearly identical to its corresponding theistic argument. atheism is the negative form of theism, so naturally it is guilty of some of the same mistakes. It is comforting to think we have the answer, and to be sure in our conviction, but that just doesn't add up in a universe so full of mystery. the logical thing to do is to accept that our bubble could be burst at any moment, and to be mentally and physically prepared for it.
Well... This is ridiculous I've lived in Fort Worth Texas my whole life and... I think it's time to move. I thought that the founders of this country made them self's abundantly clear when they said "separation of church and state" but I guess even that wasn't clear enough for these people.
@MyPhoneIsOnVibrate Are you sure you're even commenting to the right person? I've made one comment here, to a comment that the person subsequently deleted and apologized for, and for some reason that makes me clinically depressed?? And someone else says I'm cold & mean? Oh, wait, let me explain: I don't REALLY want to be taken out and shot, it's called hyperbole, most people would get that...
It is amazing there is no way to criticize them without being accused of persecution., They are the majority, and atheists are the minority. It is the equivalent of mandating minority kids attend a white power rally. Then complaining they are being bullied when someone speaks up about it.
You are such a bully! Seeing you talk made me flashback to times in high school when I was beaten up and made fun. You know, because the two are soooo similar. lol.
Reminds me of a student assembly I had to go to back in high school, the mother of one of the victims at the Columbine Shooting came in and started preaching and yelled things like "we are promised freedom of religion, not freedom from religion" and other anti-atheist slogans. Then they put up a large cross that students would sign stating their belief in god. Needless to say, I avoided school for a few days after.
The response of calling you a bully is typical and cliche. Christians have always touted that they are the majority in America, yet scream persecution and claim their "values" are under constant assault when ever it is convenient.
Healthyaddict.I want to Thank you for speaking out.I also live in Texas and the wildfire of Christianity is overpowering but with others like you willing to voice out your opinions we can make a difference.Thank you.
oemfx1965 1 month ago
neat. When does she take her clothes off.
LaxRatBra 2 months ago
BTW, the new hair color looks good and you are no bully, not as far as I'm concerned. :-)
RandomBS88 2 months ago 2
I myself find the seven project constitutionally quesionable, that coming from someone who supported/was sorta part of it in his Christian days. In particular, I question them doing the assembly during the school day to coerce the students to come to the brain-washing (er, I mean evangelizing) event that takes place in the evening. Hell, I hate proselytizing all together, but if you're going to do so, do so not during school hours and keep church and state separate.
RandomBS88 2 months ago in playlist More videos from healthyaddict
I can't click your face on my phone. I'm not surprised by the bully thing, but what excuse did they give?
XXBleedingrose 3 months ago
Looks like you're playing the piano, turn the volume off and watch.
Mglosk 3 months ago
Hey, all of you atheistic evolutards. Do you know that Ron Wyatt discovered Noah's ark, the Red Sea crossing site, the real Mount Sinai, the remains of Sodom and Gomorrah and more? You really should check out the evidence and stop being such government indoctrinated sheep. It is time that you start standing up like men and stop being such cowardly sheep.
thechessstick 3 months ago
@thechessstick Actually no he didn't Ron Wyatt is a fraud, he documents a piece of wood he claims to be from the ark, what was found that the piece of wood is actually about 10 years old, it was dosed in house hold chemicals and then seared to make it look very old, but Radiocarbon dating doesn't lie.
There isn't any evidence for anything of what you're saying.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 3 months ago 2
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Wow, you believe everything you read that agrees with your worldview, don't you? You are a perfect government-indoctrinated dolt. Try acting like a real man for a change and do some independent research.
thechessstick 3 months ago
@thechessstick Actually no, all of the world views agree with me. Your logic is poor and your coherency is completely lacking as you seem to only read things that agree with you, You read Ryan Wyatt's account for his findings, but failed to recognize all the contradicting accounts that debunked his findings.
How can you believe someone when they blatantly lied.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 3 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Because lying for Jesus is good.
MsPhoneMonkey 3 months ago
Comment removed
TheMrgoku1985 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thechessstick
It was debunked the ark was just a rock sticking out of the ground National geographic did a whole thing debunking it with over an hour footage at the site. Sodom and Gomorrah is no more evidence for the bible than New York is for Spider-man or L.A. is of Ironman
TheMrgoku1985 3 months ago
@thechessstick Actually no he didn't he was found to be a fraud when the "wood" of the ark was actually an old looking piece of wood that had been fired and stained, it wasn't anywhere near 10 years old let alone 4000.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 3 months ago
Well, what I think is that even if they are not overtly avangelizing to the students, any orginisation, no matter what there belifes are, will present there belifes if they are acting honestly.
There actions, policies, atitude, even the languedge they use will speak to what they belive. So perhaps the government just shuouldn't get involved with religius groups at all.
Disthron 4 months ago
it should be simple - if they mention God or the church in any way, it's then that they break the law - if they just give the message of how to treat people, then it should be OK...
You have to remember that whenever a church gets "attacked" by an Athiest, or someone who doesn't believe what they do, then their being bullied, but it's perfectly OK for them to attack other people's beliefs and tell them that they're going to hell :-P
THEMrFill 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@THEMrFill Right on, I hate their double standards and hypocrisy.
connerjd 4 months ago
@THEMrFill I think that if they mention evolution at all they should be put to death.
thechessstick 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thechessstick
I presume that's your idea of humor, because if not, you need to go and see a psychiatrist about your mental health issues...
THEMrFill 3 months ago
Go Ashley.. Bravo.. :-)
GlennRobert71 4 months ago
fair play point this out . i agree with your speech
Lordrevenge 4 months ago
watch?wOtEvArThEfUcKyOulIkE
twistedbass15 4 months ago
Comment removed
randomnicknameblah 4 months ago
You atheists have as your god evolution. Anyone who has simply accepted the misinformation that the government indoctrination centers shovel into the unsuspecting head of children cannot come to the correct conclusion when it comes to origins. I call this process "evolutardation" and it is rampant. Another part of this indoctrination is the "puffing-up" mechanism that is used. That is the brainwashing technique that works on a person's pride and fear that makes them smug elitists (T.E.N.C).
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick "You atheists have as your god evolution"
That doesn't even make sense.
Science should be taught in science class. Full Stop.
You want to believe in God - go ahead - but students need to be educated - that's what schools are for. Churches, mosques and synagogues can teach you about what the holy books say.
Science is about reading the Book of the world - observing the actual world around us.
If you want the USA to remain a first world nation into the future you need science.
richo61 4 months ago
@richo61 That is right "science should be taught in the classroom". That is why evolution should not be taught. Get over it. Evolution is just a philosophy... a religion. It is the religion of atheists.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick
watch?v=S9am3mfaE6U
Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus anamensis, Australopithecus afarensis, Kenyanthropus platyops, Australopithecus africanus, Australopithecus garhi, Australopithecus sediba, Australopithecus aethiopicus, Australopithecus robustus , Australopithecus boisei, Homo habilis, Homo georgicus, Homo erectus, Homo ergaster, Homo antecessor, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis, Homo floresiensis, Homo sapiens
TheMrgoku1985 3 months ago
@TheMrgoku1985 You actually believe all of those things that they teach in the indoctrination centers? You are a typical doltish evolutard.
thechessstick 3 months ago
@thechessstick
Human chromosome 2, Matching endogenous retro-viral sequences between the grate apes and humans,
recessive genes, tail muscle in humans, Progressive patterns in comparative
genes, Junk DNA, Single strain DNA.+multiple dating methods that agree with each other with an extremely low % margin of error when used correctly proving the earth is old enough for the time needed for macro change and
Ring species and nylon eating bacteria.
TheMrgoku1985 3 months ago
@TheMrgoku1985 Junk DNA!! LOL. ERV's! LOL. Dating methods that agree! LOL. You are a typical indoctrinated evolutard as well. You all have your own little club of misfits, though.
thechessstick 3 months ago
Comment removed
TheMrgoku1985 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thechessstick
Your Opinion vs falsified data.
Also to deny the fossil record watch?v=S9am3mfaE6U
(backed by zoologist and M.D's) is willful retardation.
Combine this with the genetic mapping and it is testable facts.
TheMrgoku1985 3 months ago
@TheMrgoku1985 LOL. The fossil record is actually a great testament to the Genesis account. If Noah's flood happened what would you expect to find? Answer>>> billions of dead things buried in rock layers laid down by water all of the Earth. And what do we find? Answer>>> billions of dead things buried in rock layers laid down by water all over the earth. And guess what! They have been hydrologically sorted!
thechessstick 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thechessstick
watch?v=S9am3mfaE6U
Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus anamensis, Australopithecus afarensis, Kenyanthropus platyops, Australopithecus africanus, Australopithecus garhi, Australopithecus sediba, Australopithecus aethiopicus, Australopithecus robustus , Australopithecus boisei, Homo habilis, Homo georgicus, Homo erectus, Homo ergaster, Homo antecessor, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis, Homo floresiensis, Homo sapiens
TheMrgoku1985 3 months ago
@thechessstick
watch?v=PYKJw8zc_uk
watch?v=D5o7VEvfAVM
Grate flood debunked
I want falsified data not opinion
TheMrgoku1985 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheMrgoku1985 Hey, all of you atheistic evolutards. Do you know that Ron Wyatt discovered Noah's ark, the Red Sea crossing site, the real Mount Sinai, the remains of Sodom and Gomorrah and more? You really should check out the evidence and stop being such government indoctrinated sheep. It is time that you start standing up like men and stop being such cowardly sheep. There is some data for you!
thechessstick 3 months ago
@thechessstick no they haven't they're sorted according to the era in which they died.
These layers of rock have been cooking for millions and millions of years, these dinosaur fossils aren't fossils formed 4000 years ago.
Radio metric dating proves that all of these fossils are millions of years old, and rock actually takes a very long time to make, something not going to happen in 4000 years
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 3 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Radio-metric dating only provides more evidence of old age, but fossil assemblages were known to be quite old before that. Most fossil's aren't dated using radio-metric dating as you can't date a fossil directly. Methods of relative dating and absolute dating combined give the ages of fossils.
gamileo 3 months ago
Still cute with a different hair color.
connerjd 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@connerjd Who are you talking about? You should check out theheathycabby!
thechessstick 3 months ago
First Debbie does Dallas. Now we have Healthy does Houston.
rockman1969 4 months ago
@rockman1969 Yes she is a *****.
thechessstick 4 months ago
Our numbers are growing by the day. People are wising-up. They are heeding the little boy's cry of "The Emperor has no clothes on"! Evolution is the emperor and his missing clothes is the missing evidence.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick what missing evidence? there is LOADS AND LOADS AND LOADS OF EVIDENCE for evolution
and none for creationism. There is no design, there is no evidence of creation.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Wow, you must be one of the really intelligent people who can see it!
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick if the speed of light was NOT constant, nothing in quantum nor physical mechanics would work.
there couldn't be a conservation of energy, there couldn't even be entropy.
you have no idea what you're talking about
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD There you go. You are a typical atheistic evolutard. The Pioneer Anomaly gives us direct evidence that the speed of light increases outside the affect of the solar system. Try to get over your brainwashing and think outside of your government imposed box for a change.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick WOW you pointed out a subject that can be explained by two RELATED theories.
this anomaly, after just typing it into google, and wikipedia. explains how this anomaly FURTHERED our scientific understanding of gravitational physics.
it did say how COSMOLOGY was suggested as an explanation but was later DISPROVED by scientists
the product of the equation studied did HINT at the explanation you suggest, but didn't hold any ground.
PLEASE GOOGLE STUFF BEFORE YOU POST IT.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@thechessstick IN FACT after reading the ENTIRE article.
Not one mention was made about this anomaly providing any direct or even indirect evidence that the speed of light was slower outside of the solar system.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Of course it was not mentioned that the speed of light INCREASES outside of the solar system. This would rock the evolutionary paradigm too much. By the way, it does. This is actually the cause of the Pioneer Anomaly.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick WOW, because in your previous posts you said it decreased.
and no there is NO suggestion that it speeds up, and there is NO suggestion that this is an explanation.
they disproved the cosmological hinting, and NO it is not the cause, it doesn't say anything about it.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD I am sorry. I did not know that English is not your first language. Anyway, the evidence given to us by the Pioneer spacecraft give us direct empirical evidence that the speed of light increases outside of the solar system. This evidence is so plain and contrary to the constant-speed-of-light paradigm and to modern cosmological theory that it is called an "anomaly". Do try to get over your government imposed brainwashing that gives you your biases.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick No it doesn't
IT DOESN'T SAY IT ANYWHERE
THE ONLY REASON IT IS CALLED AN ANOMALY IS BECAUSE SCIENTISTS CAN'T JUST GO LOOK AT THE CRAFT TO FIND OUT WHATS WRONG
they can only speculate on why it is happening.
WHAT BASIS AM I BEING BRAINWASHED? I JUST READ 4 PAPERS ON THE SUBJECT JUST FOR YOU AND NONE OF IT TALKS ABOUT THE SPEED OF LIGHT INCREASING!
and empirical evidence says that it can be observed multiple times! this has only been observed once via the sensors on the craft!
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@thechessstick the craft was built over 30 years ago, don't you think SOMETHING inside the craft could be giving these readings?
did you even at least read the wiki on it? it doesn't say anything about light going faster!
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@thechessstick Cite your source for this. Can't can you outside of made up Creationist bullshit.
jknengr796 4 months ago
@thechessstick It is very clear to me and to others that you read about the "pioneer anomaly" from a very shallow source such as wikipedia and now you think you know every single thing about it. Sorry to burst your bubble, but you don't know anything. So if you want to not look like a complete idiot, you should shut up now.
Gunner3210 4 months ago
w w w dot trueorigin dot or g /camplist.asp There ya go.
thechessstick 4 months ago
thank you
britbikeX 4 months ago
Here is a question for you atheist dolts. What energy did the first protoplasmic blobs of "pre-life" use and by what mechanism did they harness it? It is questions like this one that has caused even some of the most ardent evolutionists to admit that there had to be an initial creation and therefore a Creator. They then still deny the God of the Bible because they don't want to conform their lives to His will. Wake-up and stop being such simpletons.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick your question is almost ambiguous I'll explain it all.
There does not need to be a creator, there isn't any evidence of creation, this "prelife" you speak of isn't a term I can address, you're refering to the material before there was actually life, these are amino acids, RNA, and proteins. This is a very basic explanation of Abiogenesis, This is NOT related to evolution and is not considered in the study of evolution, you are mixing two subjects.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@thechessstick And please provide a SOURCE to the biologists and evolutionists that accept a creator.
also inb4:
Kent Hovind
Reliable source
pick one
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD w w w dot trueorigin dot or g /camplist.asp There ya go.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick why is it that the first 5 papers I read have absolutely no affiliation to any outside approvals BUT the creationist website itself and other creationist constituents?
why is it that none of these have been accepted by anyone OUTSIDE of creationist constituents? such as oh say the scientific community?
And in fact, I did a little Ctrl F, and turns out less than 50 are actually about biology.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Sorry, I was just showing you some PhDs who are creationists. There are more and more every day, you know. And do you know what? If you are in Iran you won't find any papers written that are critical of Islam or Mohammud. Do you understand what I am saying. Islam controls the schools there and Satan controls the schools in the West.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick because you're killed in Iran under blasphemy, anyone who denies god is killed, because it is against the law.
did you know under the 2010 census that atheists are increasing and religion is decreasing?.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD
There is a God
God's anger is shown from heaven against all the evil and
wrong things people do,by their own evil lives they hide the
truth,God shows his anger because some knowledge of him has
been made clear to them,yes God has shown himself to them.
romans 1:18-19
I am the way the truth and the life,
and the only way to the father is through me john 14:6,
oceantalk1 4 months ago
@oceantalk1 Im not angry. Why do people keep saying that? I am a loving and mercyfull god.
romperstompist 4 months ago
Comment removed
oceantalk1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@romperstompist yes but God is also a God of justice and wrath and he will punish the wicked.
oceantalk1 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD
There are things about him that people can not see-his
eternal power and all the things that make him God,but since
the beginning of the world those things have been easy to
understand by what God has made,so people have no excuse for
the bad things they do romans 1:20-21
let God be true and every man a liar romans 3:4
the word of our God stands forever isaiah 40:8
oceantalk1 4 months ago
@oceantalk1 wow woopty do you named some biblical verses of which it's metaphors can be related to who knows how many different subjects.
Naming and reciting biblical verses doesn't prove he exist, you're just reading a book
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD In the west if you let it be known that you are a creationist you lose your job at the University. I am hanging in there quite well, though!! Here I am a PhD at a major university and I am a young Earth creationist and they don't even know despite all of my students that I am persuading! LOL
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick PhD, you must have written some well thought out papers on some subject about what ever you have a PhD in, care to share?
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@thechessstick and of course you're going to get fired, for believing in such a stupid idea that the earth or universe is only 6000 years old
There is SO much proof to show that the earth is NOT 6000 years old, more like 4.5 billion
why do you ignore the super accuracy of Radio-metric dating, which uses a logarithmic (proven mathematically) function to describe age?
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD LOL @ that. To even get a radiometric date you must first let those doing the dating know how old you think the specimen is. The whole method is total garbage. Do some research, really.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick No, that assumption isn't taken.
PLEASE LEARN TO LOGARITHMS, it is ALL logarithms, there isn't an assumption taken
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD LOL LOL LOL. Are you trying to be funny? I can give you example after example of radiometric dating being stupidly wrong. You really do need to watch a few Ron Wyatt videos. And also some A. E. Wilder-Smith ones.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick I think you messed that up, why should I provide an example of it being wrong when I'm supporting it?
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@thechessstick Wow I read a website called wyattmuseum(dot)com/ron-wyatt.htm
It turns out Ron has NEVER been to turkey, and his discovery of Noaks ark is a complete fraud, the author shows how the wood of noahs ark was really just "He was a paid actor who had taken wood, soaked it in juice, and baked it in an oven to make it look old."
Wow you believe in some fraud? and you have a PhD in what exactly?
Now if you have a PhD, I should be able to find you in some PhD database? care to provide?
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD There are websites that say terrible things about Jesus, too. But you are an evolutionists. So, I am sure that you believe anything you hear that supports your bias without ever really checking out the facts. Wake-up and start being not only scientific but also noble.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick Bias? I wrote an algorithm for evolution. I proved that evolution could be replicated using mathematical logic, I was not the first, loads of people did it before I did.
Also, there is NO evidence of jesus existing.
I observed a change in a rapidly changing bacteria.
scientists have observed Staph infection evolving into MRSA, being completely penicillin resistant.
they've also seen that an ape has 99.6% the same DNA as a human does.
so please cut the crap.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Algorithms are mathematical in nature. They can be made to fit about anything. An ape has a very similar taxonomy to a human so of course its DNA would be very similar. Just like the blueprint for a Camaro is similar to a Z-28. That does not mean that there was any evolution just that they have a similar design. And, of course there is variation within a species, this is a design feature that allows creatures to adapt but there are limits. Keep studying.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick
watch?v=tI-wuW84nZQ
TheMrgoku1985 4 months ago
@thechessstick
watch?v=J3yDOp8Dv8Y
TheMrgoku1985 4 months ago
@thechessstick Good one. Either you bearing false witness or maybe your Ph.D. is in Music. You clearly have no background or even a clue on anything science related.
jknengr796 4 months ago
@thechessstick and another thing
I read the article “Does Distant Starlight Prove the Universe Is Old?” by Jason Lisle
he simply reads off the facts about the distant starlight from galaxies and then quotes a biblical verse that could be used as a metaphor relating to it from Psalm 19:1
he didn't do anything there, provides no counter evidence, and uses logical fallacies describing "assumptions" that are no longer assumptions and are in fact proven facts about light.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Do you know that no one know what the speed of light is outside of the Solar System? The speed of light in deep space may be infinite. One thing we do know is that it increases once outside of the Solar System.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick NOT TRUE AT ALL
the speed of light is CONSTANT, Nothing can exceed it, based on the equation mv/sqrt(c-v)
you cannot exceed this because in the denominator your v cannot be equal or greater than c, because you'd either be dividing by 0 or taking the square root of a negative number.
last sentence is not true, we do not know that, that is a lie, we know it is ALWAYS constant.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD You do know that that equation is just a theoretical one don't you? LOL. Wake-up.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick Not true
why do you think that NO particle has even exceeded or even met the speed of light?
remember those fancy neutrinos? they never did exceed it, it was an error that was not accounted for in the GPS satellite.
You obviously forget what a THEORY is, a theory is a set of explanation(s) that is supported by multiple counts of evidence and all fallible elements have been accounted for or disproved.
so please, you have a PHD and you don't even know what a theory is?
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD LOL. So now you have kept track of every particle that has ever existed and you know that not one of them has ever exceeded the speed of light. LOL
thechessstick 3 months ago
@thechessstick we know that they can't go faster than the speed of light because in the equation where Mass = m/ sqrt(1-c^2/v^2)
where sqrt is the square root of that function 1- the speed of light divided by the velocity of the object.
if something were to be faster than the speed of light then, you could divide by zero, and you could take the square of a negative number
but you can't do either of those things. anything faster would caused you to take a square of a negative number. can't do
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 3 months ago
Hi, I hope your health is good. Do whatever you want,just don't hurt anyone.The Universe is yours , just take it. (Cain,my 999 plan is 50yrs. old). I am not trolling, it's
time to change the world. Awajuk999@yahoo.com
rickuj 4 months ago
it's freekin' Texas. What'd you expect? They never do anything without consulting their imaginary friend.
topher01 4 months ago
My brother is in charge of The Seven Project in our state.
vexgodglove 4 months ago
A rather gorgeous and most well-spoken bully, if anything.
Keep up the good work!
Fetusmilkshake 4 months ago
this is a typical example of an ignorant and foolish woman getting taken advantage of by ungodly men. Sad....
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick I of course meant what these ungodly men do to healthyaddict.
thechessstick 4 months ago
Superintendent was dishonest and evasive by her deliberate sidestepping of the religious agenda in this assembly. It's is not just about character building (what ever that means) but a fully acknowledged program of Christian evangelization (admittedly so). Would they be so eager to host a Muslim organization's character building program? I think not. Liars.
socksumi 4 months ago
Texas; the anus of the U.S.
rhabdoviridae 4 months ago
@rhabdoviridae Got that right. When Texas tried to secede, maybe we should've let them. Jesus.
Occasionally I see some Texan 'Tard with a "Don't Mess With Texas" shirt, and I think how much I want a shirt that says "Hey everyone! Let's fuck with Texas!"
LORDOFINIQUITY 4 months ago
@rhabdoviridae Haha thank you. I love my home - you know, Texas; the anus of the U.S. I do however truely dislike the small(slash)narrow mindedness I encounter...pretty much everywhere I go. -sigh- I love you Texas.
SunZen 4 months ago
Atheists are just fools, plain and simple.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick not sure if you're stupid, or just plain stupid.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Actually, no on both counts. Try to get over the brainwashing that you received in the government indoctrination centers that you attended. Stand like a man for a change.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick What indoctrination? The government doesn't promote any, in fact this video is proof that the government is promoting the Gospel
I came to my conclusion as an atheist by myself, purely because the fact that there is no fact or reason for me to believe in god.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Wow, are you types deluded. The government absolutely promotes Darwinism/Evolutionism. You really need to read a few books by A. E. Wilder-Smith and try to get over that worldview that the government brainwashed you with.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick I thought you were implying Atheism as in your first post, sorry for not clarifying that. And yes. The reason the (state) governments promote this is because it has loads of evidence for it, there has never been a discovery major or minor that demolishes or disproves evolution entirely. As far as all the papers I've read, there hasn't been any question that has been raised ever that makes evolution any less of a fact than it was yesterday.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Since Christianity is primarily the "problem" we face in North America, I think it's always appropriate to point out the sufficient evidence against their claim that the Earth is like 6,000 years old. I mean, come on. I don't see how this is paying respect to any higher power. it's like taking your logic and free-will and common sense and tossing it all out the window because of some words on a page. if some god exists, that would probably really piss him off.
BanThisChannel 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD You are wrong on all counts. Ron Wyatt discovered Noah's ark. There is a visitor's center built at the site. Do try to get over the government brainwashing that you received in the government indoctrination centers that you attended. Try to stand like a man for a change. Don't be so effeminate.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick are you just a troll? if you are being serious then i truly pity you. i hope for your sake you're just some kid trying to get a rise out of people, and not actually a guy in his 50's who is so clearly misled and unwilling to think for himself. you are accusing people of being brainwashed when you just spit out the same jargon again and again and again and again. "be a man for a change" you have said that 100 times at least, judging by the comments on your profile.
BanThisChannel 4 months ago
@thechessstick No, no one found Noahs ark, after simply googling his name I found countless articles about how it was a SCAM, none of it was true.
you really think 4400 years ago, there was this massive flood that covered the earth to the highest mountain top? according to your bible it did.
And how did they rescue all those animals? even animals indiginous to specific parts of the world like in South America?
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD LOL. Wow, no wonder you are an evolutarded government sheep. Of course there are going to be websites that war against Ron Wyatt! Check out his discoveries for yourself and stop being the easily manipulated sheep that you are. By the way, God brought the animals to the ark. He is able to do that because He is God. The animals then walked to their eventual homes. Don't you know that there were once kangaroos in other parts of the world? The Earth divided 120 after.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick WOW GUESS WHAT GUYS? FORGET PHYSICS AND LAWS OF CONSERVATION I CAN JUST SAY GOD DID IT AND THAT JUST MAKES SENSE!
Seriously? you only believe this because a book says it? and you curb science to fit your agenda? and Actually no, he still didn't find it, it was all a hoax, I seriously went to the fifth page and all I found was were documentations of how it was a fraud and how he did it.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD LOL. God is God. He made the laws of physics. That means He is in control. If there are laws then there has to be a law-giver. Don't you even see that by your very statements that you prove the existence of God? Do try to start thinking outside of the government imposed box that you were forced into.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick You obviously skew the word Law in "law of conservation" with Law as in Business Law.
In physics, the word Law is an unbreakable pact in nature, you CANNOT create or destroy matter or energy.
please before riticuling evolution, why don't you provide any evidence to anything you say.
simply saying "God did it" is an incredibly ignorant statement and completely anti-science, you disregard all other understandings of the universe to preserve your ignorance calling me a bigot
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Actually I have a great understanding of what a law is in science. I also know that these laws needed to be created. You really should read a few A. E. Wilder-Smith videos. A. E. Wilder-Smith terribly drubbed Dick Dawkins in origins debates. It is because of these drubbings that Dick Dawkins doesn't debate creationists anymore. You atheists are so simpleminded. It is quite sad, really.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick actually no, laws do not need to be created, they are not vectors or scalar quantities.
and thanks for disregarding what the previous post was about, you totally didn't rebut anything except some how refuting some claim I didn't make about you not knowing anything about laws, which I didn't say
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Classic idiot creationist tactic, change subjects while making outrageous claims and insulting language. Most respond by trying to clear up those claims while lapsing out of the original argument, kudos for not falling for it.
whatscookingdoc 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD You are right. I cannot create or destroy matter. But guess what... God can. He is the Creator. Where did the matter for your little "big bang" come from? And where did the energy come from? And where did space come from? Get over it. God is God.
thechessstick 3 months ago
@thechessstick I didn't say you could or couldn't create matter.
You should know that the net energy of the entire universe is 0, so if you add all the energy up, it will be zero.
Also you should know is that Energy is a scalar quantity and has no direction.
Basically there is no need for a creator because the energy is not created, it is conserved. You have no evidence for god and saying 'well if you can't explain it then God did it'
space is emptiness, its just pure nothingness.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 3 months ago 2
@thechessstick hrmmm, which "government" are we talking about? have you listened to any of the republican candidates speak? it's all about God. I think you are thinking more about the education system, in which case evolution should be taught since it's the same as teaching about dinosaurs and other planets: it's science. and religion should be left out because of its ability to alienate and oppress the mind, oh and because there are dozens of religions and only one primordial goo.
BanThisChannel 4 months ago
@BanThisChannel Whichever government control's the schools you attended. That is who brainwashed you.
Try to think outside the government imposed box you have been brainwashed into. Be a man for a change.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick I'm really confused by your insulting nonsense. Are you accusing me of being brainwashed by the church or brainwashed by evolutionists? If you took the time to read and attempt to comprehend what I've written, you should quickly notice that i'm not religious and I was pointing out how many visible people in government support the notion of a christian God and many others support evolution. you are simply ignorant and arrogant, making accusations. and also fuck you.
BanThisChannel 4 months ago
@BanThisChannel The religion that is taught in the government indoctrination centers is secular humanism and its "god" is evolution. If you are an atheist then you are a believer. The difference between you and a Christian is that you are believing an unsupported lie. By the way, Ron Wyatt discovered Noah's ark. Do try to escape the misinformation that was jammed into your head.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick You remind me of one of the fat, nasty, homely bitches that THINK they're the cutest thing on the street. You clearly have no introspective ability whatsoever and are in denial about your own lack of intelligence. Please, take your tiny mind back to the television before you miss your cartoons or (your god forbid) the 700 Club.
topher01 4 months ago
@thechessstick are you a Christian accusing non-Christians of being brainwashed? dude, splash some water on your face and take a good, long look in the mirror. you are the embodiment of the intellectual failure you are accusing us of. also, way to show off some good Christian morals. you are clearly doing God's work!
BanThisChannel 4 months ago
@thechessstick think outside of the box? if I'm brainwashed then how come PRIVATE institutions also promote evolution?
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@KyuubiNaruto1337XD Are you saying that a "PRIVATE" institution could not be working for Satan? I mean assuming that Satan does exist, and I know that he does. Do you see what is wrong with your thinking? You are clearly given over to the worldview that was crammed into your head.
thechessstick 4 months ago
@thechessstick how do you know that he does? do you have any evidence?
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
@thechessstick also how is evolution satanic? it doesn't say anything about fairy tales
Whats that? it goes against your beliefs? therefore it must be satanic?
you implying other people are bigots when religion is the biggest boat of bigotry since the first crusades.
KyuubiNaruto1337XD 4 months ago
Infuriates me that people want to conflate education and religion. Classrooms should be purer places where the subject under investigation is studied without being influenced/tainted by these bronze-age ideas. Leave all that shit to Sunday school.
LAnonHubbard 4 months ago
@LAnonHubbard indeed. although there is a notable difference between studying something and teaching something. Religions are worthwhile to study, but teaching them should have no place in our education system. the 2nd and 3rd year philosophy of religion classes that i've taken only strengthened and solidified my agnosticism, so I don't think there is any danger in studying and analyzing them. But if we're talking about teaching this stuff to a bunch of kids, it is undoubtedly wrong.
BanThisChannel 4 months ago
Healthyaddict should be careful of Aron's Texas guitar.
ApostateOfTheDamned 4 months ago
I applaud you. I'll sure be glad when Texas succeeds and becomes the next Iran.
goosed1 4 months ago
Can't Texas just secede from the U.S. already? One of my friends who I've known since high school moved down there earlier this year and I still for the life of me cannot understand why. We were talking on the phone the other day and he's miserable there. He's fed up with the lack of brain activity, it's driving him nuts. What can I say, I told him so.
ChrisTheAspergerGuy 4 months ago
@ChrisTheAspergerGuy
No, you keep your friends close and your enemies closer... that's why America keeps the southerners within our borders.. easier to watch...
Robertz1986 4 months ago
@Robertz1986 I get what you're saying, however, if Texas broke off and became it's own country, then they wouldn't be poisoning the rest of the U.S. with it's ignorant and nonsensical bullshit. Like Texas trying to rewrite the history books to fit their batshit-nuts conservative aganda, trying to re-criminalize sodomy and homosexuality, the vicious attacks on women's reproductive rights, and that's just the stuff I can remember off the top of my head. A state like that has no place in the U.S.
ChrisTheAspergerGuy 4 months ago
@ChrisTheAspergerGuy They'd still be poisoning us with their foul air; the worst air quality in the U.S.
rhabdoviridae 4 months ago
@rhabdoviridae That's very true, actually.
ChrisTheAspergerGuy 4 months ago
Godless Jezebel! It's only fitting that you hold your satanic convention in the city of sin. Just kidding! I just found your channel today and I think you're great. I'm agnostic and I think atheists are just as silly as theists, but I always like to debate the finer points of reality as we know it. If you read these comments, I'd love to hear why you choose atheism over agnosticism. As I said on your other video, I really think agnosticism is the only logical choice for a modern human being.
BanThisChannel 4 months ago
@BanThisChannel How is atheist just as silly? Do you see proof in God? I sure as hell don't. I'm not going to believe in God on a lack of evidence. That's called faith, and it's for the stupid.
MetalxXxMayhem 4 months ago
@MetalxXxMayhem It's just as silly because, in a universe as vast and as unexplored as ours, with new discoveries every day even here on our planet, and with more mysteries than the human race will ever uncover before our sun burns out, atheists claim to know whether or not God or any sort of higher being exists. Demanding evidence is one thing, agnostics do that too, but asserting that there DEFINITELY is not a God is as silly as asserting that there DEFINITELY is one.
BanThisChannel 4 months ago
@BanThisChannel Asserting that there is no God is about as silly as asserting that there are no leprechauns.
rhabdoviridae 4 months ago
@rhabdoviridae no, it's as silly as asserting there is a god because both are factual claims on a subject we couldn't possibly understand. both are claims based on your own experience and your own BELIEF. asserting there are no leprechauns is easy because they are supposed to be little green-clad irishmen with magic powers and pots of gold. asserting there is no god, on the other hand, is more like asserting there are no aliens. it's simply illogical to make a definitive claim of "is" or "isn't"
BanThisChannel 4 months ago
@rhabdoviridae If, on the other hand, you are asserting that God isn't a bearded man on a throne in the sky, then maybe I can agree with you because there is absolutely no evidence to support that. the evidence to support a "higher" framework, a collective subconscious, and a power far beyond our understanding is much more substantial, so to rule out a higher power is, like i said, just plain stupid if you consider yourself thoughtful and observant. keeping an open mind limits you much less.
BanThisChannel 4 months ago
@BanThisChannel Do you mind me making an inquiry as to the specific supportive evidence for this "'higher' framework, a collective subconscious, and a power far beyond our understanding" you refer to? If there is sufficient empirical evidence to support the idea of a "higher power," then people will have reason to consider it valid, otherwise the idea can be ruled out pending sufficient evidence.
Halestorm53 4 months ago
@Halestorm53 Of course! that's a very valid question, although it's easily answered. I'm not asserting that these things exist, the evidence i'm referring to is the simple and pure fact that they could exist. that's all that is required to make that statement. beyond that, however, there is empirical evidence to suggest unseen connectivity. by "higher framework" or "power" i'm not referring to some kind of deity, I'm making the claim that there is more going on than we understand.
BanThisChannel 4 months ago
@Halestorm53 Not only is agnosticism the most logical choice, it is also the "hardest" choice. Choosing what is real and what is true is very, very easy, whether you are asserting the positive or the negative. Remaining humble is always good, in a universe to vast and complex. when i say there is evidence to support a higher framework, connectivity, power beyond our understanding, i'm referring to intuition, to the unparalleled power of the human brain, and to the nature of the universe.
BanThisChannel 4 months ago
@Halestorm53 the empirical evidence that you rightly demand is all around you. all you need to know is that you don't know it all and probably never will. it's easy to take comfort in atheism, just as easy as (insert religion here), but that doesn't make it the most logical choice. logic demands that you remain humble in your perspective, as we are, without question, a tiny uneducated speck in a universe that we could literally never fully explore or understand.
BanThisChannel 4 months ago
@Halestorm53 sigh... feeling long-winded now, but finally: "ruling out" is asserting the negative. it means you have come to the conclusion that, based on lack of testable evidence you are 100% certain that ________. I know it's said again and again by theists clinging desperately to their beliefs, but you require evidence if you want to make a definitive claim like that. both atheists and theists require evidence, just as agnostics do, but agnostics don't make such definitive claims without it.
BanThisChannel 4 months ago
@Halestorm53 This is where the argument becomes moot and agnosticism becomes the clear logical choice. Atheists will never win the argument, because even if we opened up a big hatch at the end of the universe and found a giant gay dragon and his spaghetti monster husband, Christians or Muslims or whoever could still claim that their God is out there somewhere, and that the gay dragon was part of his divine plan. I like to think agnostics sit back, reflect on life a bit, and then laugh.
BanThisChannel 4 months ago
@MetalxXxMayhem also every argument for atheism i've come across is nearly identical to its corresponding theistic argument. atheism is the negative form of theism, so naturally it is guilty of some of the same mistakes. It is comforting to think we have the answer, and to be sure in our conviction, but that just doesn't add up in a universe so full of mystery. the logical thing to do is to accept that our bubble could be burst at any moment, and to be mentally and physically prepared for it.
BanThisChannel 4 months ago
Well... This is ridiculous I've lived in Fort Worth Texas my whole life and... I think it's time to move. I thought that the founders of this country made them self's abundantly clear when they said "separation of church and state" but I guess even that wasn't clear enough for these people.
xxxrobert123xxx 4 months ago
@MyPhoneIsOnVibrate Are you sure you're even commenting to the right person? I've made one comment here, to a comment that the person subsequently deleted and apologized for, and for some reason that makes me clinically depressed?? And someone else says I'm cold & mean? Oh, wait, let me explain: I don't REALLY want to be taken out and shot, it's called hyperbole, most people would get that...
alaskafido 4 months ago
It is amazing there is no way to criticize them without being accused of persecution., They are the majority, and atheists are the minority. It is the equivalent of mandating minority kids attend a white power rally. Then complaining they are being bullied when someone speaks up about it.
LilandraX 4 months ago
This should explain who we're up against. encyclopediadramatica(dot)ch/White_Devils
CrazyCheeseMagee 4 months ago
To Whitey: The world is not going to end just because you own slightly less of it.
CrazyCheeseMagee 4 months ago
Texass is a big piece of blood soaked shit.
kurd55 4 months ago
You are such a bully! Seeing you talk made me flashback to times in high school when I was beaten up and made fun. You know, because the two are soooo similar. lol.
Ryansarcade9 4 months ago
Reminds me of a student assembly I had to go to back in high school, the mother of one of the victims at the Columbine Shooting came in and started preaching and yelled things like "we are promised freedom of religion, not freedom from religion" and other anti-atheist slogans. Then they put up a large cross that students would sign stating their belief in god. Needless to say, I avoided school for a few days after.
dirian 4 months ago
The response of calling you a bully is typical and cliche. Christians have always touted that they are the majority in America, yet scream persecution and claim their "values" are under constant assault when ever it is convenient.
MagellansUnderwear 4 months ago