Added: 1 year ago
From: TheRipperFiles1888
Views: 2,737
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Annie Chapman, "fifth and final"?? NO! She was the second victim of the canonical five.

  • @HuwGeeRection if she was just trying to sell her book,she wouldn't spend 6 million dollars of her own property to prove such thing.i believe you should read his story,and search for the letters sent to Scotland Yard,and compare it with Sickert's articles.Both were writen by the same person.Plus, the fact that he was a man that nobody would suspect of commiting such crimes does not mean that it was not the Ripper.

  • the writing is hard to read.

  • oh my god!!!!!mary ann nicholls was the first victim......gosh...walter sickert did it...READ PATRICIA'S CORNWELL BOOK,for god's sake......

  • @vainlullaby he was in france during the murders

  • @houseroof100 he was not only in France.As an actor,he used to go to many places,not to mention the fact that he himself travelled a lot.you see,then ,it was very easy to go from London to France.he was a man who spent a part of his life in the trains and when he was not travelling,he used to wonder around london.i believe he did it,but i agree that this is something controversial.each person who is interested in ripperology has a different opinion.otherwise,there wouldn't be so many suspects.

  • yup mary kelly was the final victim....most people know that!!

  • Get to the point!

  • MARY KELLY WAS THE LAST VICTIM

  • sorry mate i cant read that messed up writing

  • 3:18 found some mistakes! :)

    one woman-two women

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more