West Memphis 3 finally got justice but did they really kill those cub scouts?

[weirdcitykid]

That means - the makers of P.L had a bias - this bias reflected in their film and won celebrity cause - which in turn led to the forming of the WM3 support group. My God, people are so gullible. You really should all try and think for yourselves more. I mean that genuinely why can you not see it - it's so obvious.

Study the case again - but ignore the P.L film and see what conclusion YOU draw. Don't just follow the heard.

[weirdcitykid]

The paradise Lost docu started the support (Fact). Now did you know - Paradise Lost isn't technically a documentry - it's a docusoap. A documentry documents reality - without manipulating the audience.

Oh I cannot be bothered with this - as I type I am listenning to you and I can tell - I am wasting my time.

Just go to callahan8k - check out exhibit 500 - also consider that the documentry makers are on record as clamining they had a "gut feeling" the boys were innocent - before they even began

[weirdcitykid]

Surely you can grasp that.

So with that in mind, and the prosecution aware that the boys may walk - to enter the Alford plea was strategically brilliant. It meant the killers would admit the crime to win their freedom - nullifying them ever claiming any form of compensation. Now the compensation they were due would have amounted to millions - yet they took the Alford plea and ran.

Anyone capable of more than basic logic can deduce a lot from this - not you though.

[weirdcitykid]

Why do you all think at such a basic level? Is it a geration thing? Serious question? I mean - your logic is so damned basic.

Example - you say the prosecution wouldn't even let them out if they were guilty.

How about the fact that trying to win a 16 year old crime (a second time) amidst a storm of misguided public opinion, and a totally different socail climate was going to be difficult. This doesn't mean they were innocent - it means retrail would be a gamble 16 years after. cont...