I am 58 y/o and I am a fan of Pink Floyd, Led Zeppelin, Tangerine Dream and Jean-Michel jarre and, still, I enjoy this soooo much! The maestria, the communication between the conductor and the orchestra and the wonderfull pianist, all that is flabbergasting and highlighting! I luv it!!! That woman is lovely and her playing is wonderful. Her dedication is plain to see and that makes me shiver!
When she first walked on I was like whos the broad. Wikipedia'd her, guess she one of the best, all those awards! And the proof is here too haha. Didn't even hear of her before
To me, Martha is second only to Horowitz in interpretive abilities. I believe I read somewhere that when Rachmaninov heard Horowitz play his third, he himself said he never wanted to play it again.
Martha is more superb at developing synergy with her orchestra.
6 years ago I couldn't listen to her and like it.... now I have changed and ( I do listen to tho piece about once a week) I feel older, I suddenly am enchanted with this rendition. This is so beautiful and reminds me of Anna Karenina if I had to give it a literary name.
This most elaborated Rachmaninoff's Concerto No. 3 seems that was waiting the hands of this virtuous unparalleled Argentina artist, to be interpreted in this incredible way.
Whoever made this video was a moron. Must have been more interested in her hair than her piano abilities. The only people watching this are interested in her ability at the piano. All we see at the really interesting parts is her well-coiffed hair.
YES BUT SHE IS NOTHING WITH OUT THE ORCHESTRA, LIKE i SAY, YOU COULD MAKE EXCELLNT BOW STRINGS FROM HER HAIR,THIS IS NOT AN INSULT, BUT A COMPLEMENT, SHE IS MAGNIFICENT
La trovo perfetta (oltre che tecnicamente impeccabile) nel suo racconto d'amore e passione col piano. E' la pagina musicale che più mi coinvolge e emoziona. Magnifica interprete che con il suo tocco inimitabile rende immortale un Concerto bellssimo .Ciò ch me la fa amare è la "riconoscibilità", ha un tratto, come un pittore, elegante e intenso, che la rende unica.
The secret of the lasting success of this recording? Awesome music, an immensely talented and beautiful soloist, and lots of adrenaline and fireworks.
quanta fatica,quanto studio e quanta umile abnegazione, quanta serenità d'animo in una buona esecuzione e quanta collaborazione tra pianista e direttore
è forse la giusta strada capire che uomini e donne sono uguali e che si deve lavorare insieme col sorriso oltrechè col sudore,per ottenere qualcosa di grande
ES UNO DE LOS MEJORES MOVIMIENTOS MUSICALES QUE EL SUSCRITO HA ESCUCHADO. .PERO ESTE CONCIERTO DE RACHMANINOFF -O RACHMANININOV COMO OTROS ESCRIBEN- ES REALMENTE ESPECTACULAR, MARTHA ARGERICH ES UNA DE LA MEJORES INTÉRPRETES DE RACHMANINOFF.
ES UNO DE LOS MEJORES MOVIMIENTOS MUSICALES QUE EL SUSCRITO HA ESCUCHADO. .PERO ESTE CONCIERTO DE RACHMANINOFF -O RACHMANININOV COMO OTROS ESCRIBEN- ES REALMENTE ESPECTACULAR,
...what I really like are the lewd smirks on Chailly's face...I guess the correct Catholic term is concupiscence...anyway nice to think even in the middle of a concerto like this he can't put the dirt out of his mind...
Incredible performance by Martha, one of our greatest pianists of all time. Everyone has their personal favorites for Rachmaninoff, and mine is Vladamir Ashkenazy (for Chopin, as well). But this perfomance is a tour-de-force...and one for the ages
Some jealous french pianist I won't name out right here once said she was unable to renew her repertoire ...Sorry Moron...her abilities are extending far beyond Schumann's concerto....LOL
No...I'm talking about a dude named François René Duchable..I once heard him on the radio talking kind of mean about Martha Argerich...Maybe he was envying her being successfull ...Who knows...
@oitotheworld23 Whenever someone leaves a comment to simply negate someone else's opinion of a piece of art/performance/person, you can be assured, undoubtedly, that they are small-minded.
@oitotheworld23 "and was clearly wrong" Yes, you clearly have a superior sense of taste, and can therefore designate the "right" from "wrong" opinions, right?
Also, it's absurd to expect every opinion to start with "in my opinion" or "i think". So, for future reference, when people say "Rachmaninoff is the best" they don't actually mean that as a general fact.
@th3wing3dpaint3r the central point stands: whenever someone says one is the greatest at something related to art, you can be assured they are wrong. i agree with arthur rubinstein on this point. now whether or not argerich does it for yourself personally is your own thing. there's no need to get your panties in a bundle over this. but we could beat this horse to death if you'd like. you said she's undoubtedly the best, which is obviously incorrect. let's just say it's your opinion that she's...
@oitotheworld23 Your problem is that you actually think there's a universally accepted standard for who "the best" is. "The best", at the end of the day, is whoever you enjoy listening to the most. And nothing is "obvious" about the statement being incorrect. Would the evidence be your personal preference? What the majority think?
The issue is not you liking or hating any pianist, it's the fact that you actually think your opinions are superior :s
@th3wing3dpaint3r did i insult your mom or something? you really need to get over this. just take a deep breath and relaaaax. you were wrong, nbd. get over it.
correct me if i am wrong but didn´t even horowitz say once that she play some great parts like rachmaninoffs third better than he could? I have read this quote once in a book but can´t find it anymore...
I've heard better at 2011 6th festival of world symphonic orchestra in Moscow. they were performed by Russian National Philharmonic Orchestra. yep. slightly better.
This is an truly outstanding version, one of the very best. However I think that the definitive version of this piece is Horowitz's. It seems as if it were composed especially for him. On the other hand the orchestra here is very good too, probably marginally better than Mehta or Reiner (poor sound recording from 1951).
Apart from that, the beginning of the 2nd movement, between parts 2 and 3, is missing here,
@tjtheplay Yes, very hard to decide. One brings to it something the other doesn't. Argerich has a canonically classical approach. This is why I prefer her for Prokofiev. But Horowitz has got the Russian story down. Much more storytelling going on with Horowitz. The clarity of Argerich, though, is phenomenal.
I like the clarity of some phrases, for example from 1:25 to 2:40 she is perfect, but in other moments, for example the end of the first period at 2:50 - 3:03 it is too rushed, typical characteristic of this great interpreter.
I have read some comments about the fact that this piece is better played by mens for the power of the sound : this is totally wrong with Argerich, in fact her problem is exactly the opposite, she never found a way to control her aggressivity.
@3BoMc I love watching the expression on Chailly's face at 2:45, where he starts rolling his eyes... and it breaks out in a smirk at 2:52. It says it all.
Probably the greatest ever recorded performance of Rachmaninoff's 3rd Concerto. Its aliveness and vitality is very uplifting. Even better than the sublime Vladimir Ashkenazy recordings which I love.
@pianoandvideogames I was browsing the southbank website (a venue in London, where I live) randomly and saw that she's coming!! Was so excited bought the ticket there n then!
Does anyone know the date of this performance? I know it was between 1982 and 1989 since that was the time frame in which Riccardo Chailly was the principal conductor of the Deutsches Symphonie-Orchester Berlin (according to Wikipedia).
@LordCalvinHastings Shut the fucking up yourself. It was a fucking stupid question. If you dont know anymore, go fuck yourself away and suck your mother dick . Oh sorry , is your father dick. You have no mother .
I wish I could somehow convince Martha to play Chopin solo pieces again. Now that she is at the peak of her career musically, it would be amazing to hear her play the old pieces again.
@LordCalvinHastings I absolutely agree... The only 'old pieces' she plays are Chopin, Schumann and Beethoven concertos, and she totally ended with solo pieces. I do understand that she doesn't like the feeling of playin' alone, but for us, listeners, it's such a pity, to be disabled to hear it again...
I wonder... I wonder what she's muttering to herself while she plays this. And I wonder if she didn't get it on with Chailly. There's no particular reason to assume this, except that I'm always happy when a member of team beard gets to have sex with a goddess. However, if their plan was to get to know each other so he could make the orchestra keep up with her, it didn't work.
A superb treat, a transcendent collective performance! Such power. such beauty! Argerich is stunning, she belongs to the small elite of the greatest pianists. Each has his or her way. As musical theatre, this is a musical Adam and Eve —the story from the time of the Fall and heroic trek into our real world. More existential than we give Rachmaninoff credit for. Chailly pantomimes the emotions; the orchestra plays a wonderful chorus. Among the best ever.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Too fast, colourless and very confusing and weak octaves for my taste. Horowitz is untouchable playing this piece. As Rachmaninoff said, "...he (Horowitz) swallowed it whole." Rach 3 will always be Horowit'z property. Sorry... my opinion
1 - It's pathetic those people who think necessary do criticize Argerich in order to put their favourite pianist forward.
oodacoo, you find this too fast ? listen to Horowitz with barbirolli, he is as fast if not faster.
Colourless ? Argerich has always been famed for her wide range of tonal shading. Try to listen this on a good Hi-Fi system to appreciate her wonderful sound.
Weak octaves ? her octaves are known to be among the most formidable of all.
I didn't specified that I was talking about New York, 1978 with Zubin Mehta and not to the 1941 performance. I do have a pretty good Hi-Fi system where I listen to both and I still think Horowitz is better. Among the best is right... but not as good.... are you really saying that Argerich has better or stronger octaves than Horowitz? Really? Are you sure?
Oodacoo, yes I maintain that Argerich's octaves are among the best in term of speed, strength and accuracy, in the same league as Horowitz, and if there is a gap between both, without any doubt it is very very small.
I totally agree that Martha is one of the greatest pianist ever. But I have to say that I prefer the concerto played by a man cause of the weight needs. Its one of the best performances but is played too fast and she somewhere loses the sence of the feeling and the clearness of the melody. The best performance was by Horowith which was better than Rachmaninoff's and no one did reach it yet. When Rach heard Horowitz's performance he was so impressed that he never performed his concerto again!!!
You just don´t know what you are talking about, so shut up!! And by the way, among a series of great performances, I must say that no one compares to argerich´s one as far as deepness, clarity, interpretation and technical perfection. Amazing!!
look man...I did not said that to argue with someone or make a fight here. This is my opinion and how i respect someone else opinion even if i dont like it i expect from others to respect mine. You are not in the right position telling me to shut up and being rude. Add me as many (-) as you want but dont try pushing me to your opinion. YES MARTHA IS GREAT AND I DINT SAID THE OPPOSITE. But I prefer Horowitz.....its my opinion.
08:00 onwards is magical
nokiaman2002 21 hours ago
The person who made this video can bu sure that I wanted to see the violins and her face during the cadenza.
bfeyalcin 4 days ago
she plays so softly when needed and so angryly when needed. so amazing!
classic45612 1 week ago
8:26 - 9:02 BEST PART, OMG...
AlexPlautz1 2 weeks ago
I am 58 y/o and I am a fan of Pink Floyd, Led Zeppelin, Tangerine Dream and Jean-Michel jarre and, still, I enjoy this soooo much! The maestria, the communication between the conductor and the orchestra and the wonderfull pianist, all that is flabbergasting and highlighting! I luv it!!! That woman is lovely and her playing is wonderful. Her dedication is plain to see and that makes me shiver!
Linstrumentiste 4 weeks ago
if only Rachmaninoff could hear his music being played, he would never write again again
quinterotonalayo 1 month ago
@2:50, man I love that conductor's smile..he's like "holy mama...she's good." LOL
Melliflute 1 month ago in playlist More videos from DC788 2
She's actually beautiful!
alexxshaw42 1 month ago
When she first walked on I was like whos the broad. Wikipedia'd her, guess she one of the best, all those awards! And the proof is here too haha. Didn't even hear of her before
IaxobusJames 1 month ago
She walked into the halls f greatness with that solo.
PattiKay63 2 months ago
The solo is engaging and explosive.
PattiKay63 2 months ago
utterly terrifying. Like the Nielsen for Clarinet.
PattiKay63 2 months ago
How frightening this concerto must be for a pianist
Valk72 2 months ago
how on earth has this only got 93,000 views????????
differentducks 2 months ago
Goodness...
TheSaministro 2 months ago
To me, Martha is second only to Horowitz in interpretive abilities. I believe I read somewhere that when Rachmaninov heard Horowitz play his third, he himself said he never wanted to play it again.
Martha is more superb at developing synergy with her orchestra.
refrmcetsryt 2 months ago in playlist Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto 2 2
6 years ago I couldn't listen to her and like it.... now I have changed and ( I do listen to tho piece about once a week) I feel older, I suddenly am enchanted with this rendition. This is so beautiful and reminds me of Anna Karenina if I had to give it a literary name.
callasfleming 2 months ago 7
やっぱり凄いんだ この人は!!ぜんぜん違う。パソコンの仕事をする傍らに聴こうとしてバックミュージックにならない。気持ちがこっちに来てしまう。凄い情熱と集中力。
princessyaegakihime 2 months ago in playlist YouTube Mix for Sergey Rachmaninov 2
Eight people quit piano lessons... 713 were inspired.
godbluffvdgg 2 months ago
Martha is a force of nature
glezzery62 2 months ago 2
This most elaborated Rachmaninoff's Concerto No. 3 seems that was waiting the hands of this virtuous unparalleled Argentina artist, to be interpreted in this incredible way.
jomerod 2 months ago in playlist Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto No. 3 - Martha Argerich
Jesus Christ, this is fucking incredible!
alexandertroymusic 3 months ago
8:30 He says : "I can't belive that this is possible..."
Eduardosw503 3 months ago 2
well I think her hair is great, like I said before you could make bow strings no problem
kopynd1 3 months ago
Whoever made this video was a moron. Must have been more interested in her hair than her piano abilities. The only people watching this are interested in her ability at the piano. All we see at the really interesting parts is her well-coiffed hair.
LeCaptiv1 3 months ago 13
@LeCaptiv1 actually rather than wathcing fingers ı prefer watching face and emotions of a master while playing such masterpiece:)
tamtamwest 3 weeks ago
@LeCaptiv1 hahah .. very true
treedeblue 2 weeks ago
Around 5:30 always gives me chills.
samtheman264 3 months ago
@samtheman264 Whole this concerto gives me chills :-D
davidmirth 3 months ago
@davidmirth Agreed.
samtheman264 3 months ago
Comment removed
samtheman264 3 months ago
YES BUT SHE IS NOTHING WITH OUT THE ORCHESTRA, LIKE i SAY, YOU COULD MAKE EXCELLNT BOW STRINGS FROM HER HAIR,THIS IS NOT AN INSULT, BUT A COMPLEMENT, SHE IS MAGNIFICENT
kopynd1 3 months ago
La trovo perfetta (oltre che tecnicamente impeccabile) nel suo racconto d'amore e passione col piano. E' la pagina musicale che più mi coinvolge e emoziona. Magnifica interprete che con il suo tocco inimitabile rende immortale un Concerto bellssimo .Ciò ch me la fa amare è la "riconoscibilità", ha un tratto, come un pittore, elegante e intenso, che la rende unica.
salstiha 4 months ago
Comment removed
salstiha 4 months ago
Martha Argerich is one of the best....... i love how she play's music <3
fonikos1 4 months ago
She Rached it pretty hard yall.
danielmrussell 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The secret of the lasting success of this recording? Awesome music, an immensely talented and beautiful soloist, and lots of adrenaline and fireworks.
simcha181818 4 months ago in playlist Martha Argerich
Memorable!!!
willtoni 4 months ago
08:02 MAGNIFICENT!
AbigailReggieLove 4 months ago
Wich year is this?
thebluewoods 4 months ago
@thebluewoods 1985 or something around, I'm not sure
davidmirth 4 months ago
Beautiful Music.....Beautiful Playing....and what a beautiful Lady....
mehulpanditful 4 months ago
Comment removed
simcha181818 4 months ago
Comment removed
simcha181818 4 months ago
Comment removed
simcha181818 4 months ago
awsome
dinkarrao1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
She is playing with only one eye. :D
olivleonardo 4 months ago
quanta fatica,quanto studio e quanta umile abnegazione, quanta serenità d'animo in una buona esecuzione e quanta collaborazione tra pianista e direttore
è forse la giusta strada capire che uomini e donne sono uguali e che si deve lavorare insieme col sorriso oltrechè col sudore,per ottenere qualcosa di grande
gesolreut1 5 months ago
Martha... marry me!
cosmicjazzer 5 months ago
Martha really "Shines"....
homerochoto 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SUSCRIBO LA APRECIACIÓN DEL AMIGO LoveRockYou QUE NOS DICE:
This is first time i watch and listen Martha`s play and i must say I am in love with her.Great pianist and unbelievable woman.
Thank God and Rachmaninoff for creating such womand and music.
moliverap 5 months ago
ES UNO DE LOS MEJORES MOVIMIENTOS MUSICALES QUE EL SUSCRITO HA ESCUCHADO. .PERO ESTE CONCIERTO DE RACHMANINOFF -O RACHMANININOV COMO OTROS ESCRIBEN- ES REALMENTE ESPECTACULAR, MARTHA ARGERICH ES UNA DE LA MEJORES INTÉRPRETES DE RACHMANINOFF.
.
moliverap 5 months ago
ES UNO DE LOS MEJORES MOVIMIENTOS MUSICALES QUE EL SUSCRITO HA ESCUCHADO. .PERO ESTE CONCIERTO DE RACHMANINOFF -O RACHMANININOV COMO OTROS ESCRIBEN- ES REALMENTE ESPECTACULAR,
.
moliverap 5 months ago
This is first time i watch and listen Martha`s play and i must say I am in love with her.Great pianist and unbelievable woman.
Thank God and Rachmaninoff for creating such womand and music.
LoveRockYou 5 months ago
good performance and a nice song!
specter290 6 months ago
I totally love this.
rrrullgardina 6 months ago
...what I really like are the lewd smirks on Chailly's face...I guess the correct Catholic term is concupiscence...anyway nice to think even in the middle of a concerto like this he can't put the dirt out of his mind...
fredericfranc 6 months ago
This is like an episode of who's the boss.
playpianolikewoah 6 months ago
Incredible performance by Martha, one of our greatest pianists of all time. Everyone has their personal favorites for Rachmaninoff, and mine is Vladamir Ashkenazy (for Chopin, as well). But this perfomance is a tour-de-force...and one for the ages
Deuterium2H 6 months ago 2
Some jealous french pianist I won't name out right here once said she was unable to renew her repertoire ...Sorry Moron...her abilities are extending far beyond Schumann's concerto....LOL
mokacode 6 months ago 11
@mokacode who???
wendy3212 1 month ago
@wendy3212 François-René Duchâble ...sorry for the fans...lol
mokacode 1 month ago
@mokacode Are you talking about Helene Grimaud?
andreea140794 1 month ago
@andreea140794
No...I'm talking about a dude named François René Duchable..I once heard him on the radio talking kind of mean about Martha Argerich...Maybe he was envying her being successfull ...Who knows...
mokacode 1 month ago
Ricardo Chailly is a master.
TheIdeaLNation 6 months ago
Undoubtedly the greatest pianist of modern times, the coupling of ardent ferocity, passion and impeccable control are unequaled even by Horowitz
chttrbx 6 months ago 27
@chttrbx totally agree...this version is superior to any of Horowitz's recordings.
HJKey 4 months ago
@chttrbx totally agree...this version is superior to any of Horowitz's recordings.
HJKey 4 months ago
@chttrbx whenever someone says that an individual is "the greatest" in the world of art, you can be assured, undoubtedly, that they are wrong.
oitotheworld23 3 months ago
@oitotheworld23 Whenever someone leaves a comment to simply negate someone else's opinion of a piece of art/performance/person, you can be assured, undoubtedly, that they are small-minded.
th3wing3dpaint3r 3 months ago
@th3wing3dpaint3r the "opinion" was presented as fact and was clearly wrong, so i thought i'd say as much. nothing more. enjoy the music.
oitotheworld23 3 months ago
@oitotheworld23 "and was clearly wrong" Yes, you clearly have a superior sense of taste, and can therefore designate the "right" from "wrong" opinions, right?
Also, it's absurd to expect every opinion to start with "in my opinion" or "i think". So, for future reference, when people say "Rachmaninoff is the best" they don't actually mean that as a general fact.
th3wing3dpaint3r 3 months ago
@th3wing3dpaint3r take a deep breath there buddy, no need to be so sensitive.
oitotheworld23 3 months ago
@oitotheworld23 o yes! a change of topic...classic :D
th3wing3dpaint3r 3 months ago
@th3wing3dpaint3r the central point stands: whenever someone says one is the greatest at something related to art, you can be assured they are wrong. i agree with arthur rubinstein on this point. now whether or not argerich does it for yourself personally is your own thing. there's no need to get your panties in a bundle over this. but we could beat this horse to death if you'd like. you said she's undoubtedly the best, which is obviously incorrect. let's just say it's your opinion that she's...
oitotheworld23 3 months ago
@oitotheworld23 Your problem is that you actually think there's a universally accepted standard for who "the best" is. "The best", at the end of the day, is whoever you enjoy listening to the most. And nothing is "obvious" about the statement being incorrect. Would the evidence be your personal preference? What the majority think?
The issue is not you liking or hating any pianist, it's the fact that you actually think your opinions are superior :s
th3wing3dpaint3r 3 months ago
@th3wing3dpaint3r ugh. your tone makes me guess that you're a liberal? it's not about being superior, but correct or incorrect.
oitotheworld23 3 months ago
@oitotheworld23 Your tone makes me guess that you're a bigot? "correct / Incorrect" apply to maths, not art.
th3wing3dpaint3r 3 months ago
@th3wing3dpaint3r did i insult your mom or something? you really need to get over this. just take a deep breath and relaaaax. you were wrong, nbd. get over it.
oitotheworld23 3 months ago
@oitotheworld23 Again, a topic change with no intelligent input whatsoever :D
th3wing3dpaint3r 3 months ago
@th3wing3dpaint3r the best and call it a day
oitotheworld23 3 months ago
@chttrbx
correct me if i am wrong but didn´t even horowitz say once that she play some great parts like rachmaninoffs third better than he could? I have read this quote once in a book but can´t find it anymore...
Dafti0815 3 months ago
@chttrbx Yes I agree.
PattiKay63 2 months ago
Can anyone tell me when this performance was?
RH98 6 months ago
I had no idea until now that my hairs could stand up for nine minutes in a row.
natalie23091989 7 months ago
@hugginduff lol xD
liodhan 7 months ago
who's the jerk with the batton, he think's ye is so clever
kopynd1 7 months ago
Así da mucho gusto escuchar el concierto 3 de Rachmaninov !!!!
MrHernan1991 7 months ago
I've heard better at 2011 6th festival of world symphonic orchestra in Moscow. they were performed by Russian National Philharmonic Orchestra. yep. slightly better.
scavengerrondz 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is an truly outstanding version, one of the very best. However I think that the definitive version of this piece is Horowitz's. It seems as if it were composed especially for him. On the other hand the orchestra here is very good too, probably marginally better than Mehta or Reiner (poor sound recording from 1951).
Apart from that, the beginning of the 2nd movement, between parts 2 and 3, is missing here,
MarcusHK1 7 months ago
Comment removed
MarcusHK1 7 months ago
Comment removed
MarcusHK1 7 months ago
Omg I can't decide which is better!!! Martha Agerich or Horowitz!!!
I do feel like she plays too fast in this one.
HOWEVER, I also feel like Horowitz old age in his recordings effected his piano playing ability and is a little more sloppy.
tjtheplay 7 months ago
@tjtheplay Horowitz !!!!! He just banged away. Not abel to touch Vanya.
Ettoredipugnar 7 months ago
@tjtheplay Yes, very hard to decide. One brings to it something the other doesn't. Argerich has a canonically classical approach. This is why I prefer her for Prokofiev. But Horowitz has got the Russian story down. Much more storytelling going on with Horowitz. The clarity of Argerich, though, is phenomenal.
piax00 7 months ago
whoever produced this video did a terrible job, why do I want to look at her head when she is playing?
hugginduff 7 months ago 2
martha you are a star
kopynd1 8 months ago
Russian lost their culture after the revolution. Now we not only do Tchaykovsky or Rahmaninoff, to Michael Jackson far (((((
lembke1981 8 months ago
oh. my. goodness. such power.
oitotheworld23 8 months ago
I like the clarity of some phrases, for example from 1:25 to 2:40 she is perfect, but in other moments, for example the end of the first period at 2:50 - 3:03 it is too rushed, typical characteristic of this great interpreter.
I have read some comments about the fact that this piece is better played by mens for the power of the sound : this is totally wrong with Argerich, in fact her problem is exactly the opposite, she never found a way to control her aggressivity.
3BoMc 9 months ago 6
@3BoMc I love watching the expression on Chailly's face at 2:45, where he starts rolling his eyes... and it breaks out in a smirk at 2:52. It says it all.
vst631 9 months ago
Probably the greatest ever recorded performance of Rachmaninoff's 3rd Concerto. Its aliveness and vitality is very uplifting. Even better than the sublime Vladimir Ashkenazy recordings which I love.
Dorjejinpa 9 months ago
Im gonna watch her perform in June!!! :D :D
freya38 9 months ago
@freya38 How can I find out her concert schedule? I can't seem to find her official website or whatever it is...
pianoandvideogames 9 months ago
@pianoandvideogames I was browsing the southbank website (a venue in London, where I live) randomly and saw that she's coming!! Was so excited bought the ticket there n then!
freya38 9 months ago
Does anyone know the date of this performance? I know it was between 1982 and 1989 since that was the time frame in which Riccardo Chailly was the principal conductor of the Deutsches Symphonie-Orchester Berlin (according to Wikipedia).
pianoandvideogames 9 months ago
@pianoandvideogames It was performed and live recorded in late 1982
RC111295 9 months ago
@pianoandvideogames December......to be exact
RC111295 9 months ago
@pianoandvideogames December 5th, 1982 to be even more exact. :)
mmoynan 7 months ago
What orchestra is Riccardo Chailly conducting? Leipzig Gewandhaus?
3636Mary 9 months ago
@3636Mary It is the Deutsches Symphonie-Orchester Berlin.
pianoandvideogames 9 months ago
very fast but all in all a fantastic performance... good to the ear and every note perfectly adressed... orchestra better keep up;-)
MrTargenor 10 months ago 3
ohmy god chuck norris conductor
MrYagolog 10 months ago
Martha Argerich's playing is special.. no one can copy her music :)
This Concerto played by Archerich is Awesome ! :)
I wish i could play like her ...(in my dream .. x_x)
musicclassical376 10 months ago 26
I love how the conductor has to keep checking back on Martha to make sure He is doing okay. LOL
mattcabideinchrist 11 months ago
Unforgettable performance. I think that Argerich is one of the greatest pianist in the history of piano. In this performance show us how she is giant
35m 11 months ago 4
Clueless camera man!!!
youjustdontknow76 11 months ago
Clueless cameraman!!!
youjustdontknow76 11 months ago
She's fantastic. Beautiful full-bodied tone. An inspirational performance. Makes me want to play again...
tubenoc 11 months ago 2
Eu me pergunto, quando ela tocará novamente este concerto...
avalokiteshivara 11 months ago 5
This performance is perfection, I can't possibly say anything more.
dalcazar96 11 months ago 5
Pity the camera man didn't focus on her hands at all!
theFirecat00 1 year ago 4
4 people don't know what is music.
J0a0Francisc0 1 year ago 3
Why are all the russian composers so genial ?
JonnyboyCalippo 1 year ago 2
I am sure, Rachmaninov loves this great concert!
The Conductor and Martha. :-) WOW
agnodystop 1 year ago
Have any of you noticed that she plays without musical scores, then she plays it all by heart?
Deathss81 1 year ago 2
8:53. Is she playing faster than the orchestra?
LordCalvinHastings 1 year ago
@LordCalvinHastings shut the fuck up man
you know what
Kcohlorskyfo 1 year ago
@Kcohlorskyfo Shut the fuck up yourself. It was a question. If you can't answer it, go away.
LordCalvinHastings 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LordCalvinHastings Shut the fucking up yourself. It was a fucking stupid question. If you dont know anymore, go fuck yourself away and suck your mother dick . Oh sorry , is your father dick. You have no mother .
Kcohlorskyfo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LordCalvinHastings stupid ass stupid fucking question
Kcohlorskyfo 1 year ago
@Kcohlorskyfo Well, at least tell me what you found so offensive in my question.
LordCalvinHastings 1 year ago
@LordCalvinHastings Definitely not. The tempo for each performing is previously establisted by the soloist and the conductor of the orchestra.
kurzelukdaniel 1 year ago
I wish I could somehow convince Martha to play Chopin solo pieces again. Now that she is at the peak of her career musically, it would be amazing to hear her play the old pieces again.
LordCalvinHastings 1 year ago 2
@LordCalvinHastings I absolutely agree... The only 'old pieces' she plays are Chopin, Schumann and Beethoven concertos, and she totally ended with solo pieces. I do understand that she doesn't like the feeling of playin' alone, but for us, listeners, it's such a pity, to be disabled to hear it again...
davidnovotnypiano 1 year ago
Gosh, I love this woman.
LordCalvinHastings 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LordCalvinHastings Now, we are two! :)
agnodystop 1 year ago
this is so emotional its brilliant fantastic
salibest10 1 year ago 2
I wonder... I wonder what she's muttering to herself while she plays this. And I wonder if she didn't get it on with Chailly. There's no particular reason to assume this, except that I'm always happy when a member of team beard gets to have sex with a goddess. However, if their plan was to get to know each other so he could make the orchestra keep up with her, it didn't work.
hymnofashes 1 year ago
Grandiose!
TheRekisum 1 year ago
wonderful thank you for this very much Grazie Mille! che anno?
Umbriaga 1 year ago
Qué belleza. De qué año es la grabación y dónde?
fftopia 1 year ago 2
UNIQUE!!! She is the best doing this
moniayasa 1 year ago
I prefer this over Stephen Hough's performance. Argerich has so much fire and beauty in her playing.
ahsmusicman 1 year ago 3
there's another upload of this concerto with poorer quality, yours is better, I can't thank ya enough!
richclayderman 1 year ago 2
To make this even more difficult to decide, check Yefim Bronfman's performance... brilliant!
gsalone 1 year ago
yes! magnificent performance. she's got it!
TuckerSolo 1 year ago
I have this on CD,, but to see it performed is amazing. What was the conductor thinking at 2.53 ? Something like "Wow, this is good, really good."
LlygaidAgor 2 years ago
A superb treat, a transcendent collective performance! Such power. such beauty! Argerich is stunning, she belongs to the small elite of the greatest pianists. Each has his or her way. As musical theatre, this is a musical Adam and Eve —the story from the time of the Fall and heroic trek into our real world. More existential than we give Rachmaninoff credit for. Chailly pantomimes the emotions; the orchestra plays a wonderful chorus. Among the best ever.
cdgidding 2 years ago 2
8:30 - now the conductor and orchestra awaken and know they are in for an epic perfomance.
rbrtwllc 2 years ago 63
@rbrtwllc Chailly realised it at 2:53 :)
nancylam82 2 years ago
You are damn right! Look at the expression on Chailly's face. Haha.
specialist28s 1 year ago
@rbrtwllc Yes :-)) Too bad the conductor and orchestra did not do her justice. She is extraordinary, they are discordent and wanting!
Bret6464 5 months ago
Wundervoll, diese Einspielung! Argerich in Höchstform.
DerStaubsauger 2 years ago 4
ROFL!! 4:53-5:00
sytaj 2 years ago
I'd say both Argerich and Horowitz's versions are very coherent in their own ways.
Argerich has that fantastic driven energy and pianistic perfection.
But Horowitz is just... charming! There's no other word. :) I'm having trouble deciding who's the best in absolute terms.
fbager 2 years ago 4
Brilliant and ADHD. I adore her.
e97zsa 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Too fast, colourless and very confusing and weak octaves for my taste. Horowitz is untouchable playing this piece. As Rachmaninoff said, "...he (Horowitz) swallowed it whole." Rach 3 will always be Horowit'z property. Sorry... my opinion
oodacoo 2 years ago
1 - It's pathetic those people who think necessary do criticize Argerich in order to put their favourite pianist forward.
oodacoo, you find this too fast ? listen to Horowitz with barbirolli, he is as fast if not faster.
Colourless ? Argerich has always been famed for her wide range of tonal shading. Try to listen this on a good Hi-Fi system to appreciate her wonderful sound.
Weak octaves ? her octaves are known to be among the most formidable of all.
This is near slander !
rigel48 2 years ago 3
I didn't specified that I was talking about New York, 1978 with Zubin Mehta and not to the 1941 performance. I do have a pretty good Hi-Fi system where I listen to both and I still think Horowitz is better. Among the best is right... but not as good.... are you really saying that Argerich has better or stronger octaves than Horowitz? Really? Are you sure?
oodacoo 2 years ago
Oodacoo, yes I maintain that Argerich's octaves are among the best in term of speed, strength and accuracy, in the same league as Horowitz, and if there is a gap between both, without any doubt it is very very small.
rigel48 2 years ago 3
actually, libel, cuz it's written.
BorgFalcon 2 years ago 3
2 - oodacoo : First, Horowitz does not need you to criticize Argerich, or anyone else, to be recognized as one of the greatest pianist ever.
Second, whether you like it or not, Argerich's Rach3 is one of the best rendition of this work, and quite a match for Horowitz.
rigel48 2 years ago 2
Horowitz told me to do this. He talks to me.
oodacoo 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I really like it.
hobomeabho 2 years ago
the melody after 9 minutes is so mysterious!!!
lst9162 2 years ago
08:28 simplemente glorioso!!!!!
germanparrado 2 years ago
la divina!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
marrieter08 2 years ago 2
Her touch is great...
joekkkk7 2 years ago 2
It's like I always say, the bigger the hair the better the pianist...
andrewjohnd 2 years ago 3
Rachmaninov had very short hair...
QPer76 2 years ago
And Hofmann
lscully3 2 years ago
Lol hahaha
lst9162 2 years ago
I totally agree that Martha is one of the greatest pianist ever. But I have to say that I prefer the concerto played by a man cause of the weight needs. Its one of the best performances but is played too fast and she somewhere loses the sence of the feeling and the clearness of the melody. The best performance was by Horowith which was better than Rachmaninoff's and no one did reach it yet. When Rach heard Horowitz's performance he was so impressed that he never performed his concerto again!!!
theo1ch 2 years ago
but Rachmaninoff did play the third again, and even made a recording. must be another symphonic hyperbole of yours
yil7001 2 years ago
You just don´t know what you are talking about, so shut up!! And by the way, among a series of great performances, I must say that no one compares to argerich´s one as far as deepness, clarity, interpretation and technical perfection. Amazing!!
BaptisteClamence 2 years ago
look man...I did not said that to argue with someone or make a fight here. This is my opinion and how i respect someone else opinion even if i dont like it i expect from others to respect mine. You are not in the right position telling me to shut up and being rude. Add me as many (-) as you want but dont try pushing me to your opinion. YES MARTHA IS GREAT AND I DINT SAID THE OPPOSITE. But I prefer Horowitz.....its my opinion.
theo1ch 2 years ago 4