Can anyone tell me if we have a right to defend ourselves against overzealous and abusive police officers with deadly force if we perceive them to be a THREAT TO US CITIZENS ? IF so is there a LAW or STATUTE allowing CITIZENS TO USE DEADLY FORCE to protect themselves from such BRUTALITY ?
i am surprised he didn't call in back up... well i guess he couldn't he never even put it in the system till the end. and if he did they would be like why you stop them.... "He was runnin a 72 in a 70!!"
so let's say if they were, in fact, terrorists.......so the cop asks where they are going, he's going to say "We're going down here with these WMDs in our trunk to blow some people up....are we free to go?" I mean, come on.
cops think they are doing the right thing because they are taught that way, but they need to know that they wipe their asses with The Constitution.....without even realizing it.
I can comment all day on this video!! This cop def does not look like the brightest Crayon in the box. Thank God they choose the not so smart people to be cops
72 in a 70! In the middle of no where Texas! People are falling to sleep because you have to drive 70 through Texas even though there is only a straight highway in the middle of nowhere. Should be like the Autobahn.
According to Macgyver a stick of gum and a paper clip is bomb material so can I get caught for that. Is every cop trained in knowing how to make a bomb so they can arrest the right "bomb makers"? Seems to me that if every cop knows how to make a bomb then they should be on the "no fly" list
This is just another example of how local police have become Federalized and are giving us obedience training. The ratchet is tightening all around us. I think the Texas trooper knows deep down that he is wrong and he'll likely do some soul searching of his own. I've seen all your videos and have learned a lot of things about what I will do when I'm stopped. God bless you preacher man. Don't give an inch
Why the hell was the driver in the front seat of the Troopers car ?? That is very unusual without handcuffed and Trooper not even in the car with him ? Anybody want to comment bout this ?/
@bnetx1: I've been placed in the front seat of a Texas DPS car a couple of times. One time, he questioned me, then left me in his car while he questioned my wife in our truck to see if our stories matched. I guess he left me there because he knew of me and the fact that I've lived here some 30 years.
So, it's not unknown.
Interesting note was that my wife listened to our conversation on the scanner so knew what answers I gave before he asked her the same questions. Go figure.
He might be a nice guy. However, He's still too much big brother for me. He pulled you over because of your license plate, and to check for contraband, not because he is soo concerned about going 72 in a 70 zone. That's obviously a trumped up excuse.
I like this cop because he is a human, he is voicing his opinions. I hate cops who say: "I'm sorry, I'm not permitted to give any opinions." They are robots!
@randrews02809 I completely agree. Anderson refused to answer questions then continues to talk "...in a Kia", "looking for crime... searching for problems... we're not involved in any crime right now.. police state..." -
He's GIVING INFORMATION. He offers "I'm a Baptist pastor..." then proceeds to provide voluntary information about his border beat down! Then he instigates conversation about the OK bombings? That's crazy.
Anderson, you voluntarily squealed like a baby for 13 minutes.
@philkill1984 Why is it anyones business where you are going and what you are doing? Is he still a juvenile still living in his mommy and daddies house? The cop seems like a nice guy......but I understand what the pastor is trying to stand up against.........used to be a few bad apples in power now it is only a few good apples in power
@XJT1972X its not anyones business where he is going. I still think the pastor is an arsehole though, he just prolonged the situation wasting both his own time, his friends and the coppers.... maybe I don't understand because I am not American.
@philkill1984 The pastor is sticking up for our constitutional right to free travel and illegal searches and seizers.....It is not about just being american......FREEDOM should be a WORLD wide RIGHT...and people are trampling on those rights because to many of us just roll over like a dog and piss on our leg so we dont get beat. EVERYONE around the world should STAND UP for there personal GOD given RIGHTS!!!! PEACE and FREEDOM can work in HARMONY!
see what you guys fail to see is that some cops are not assholes on a powertrip, that ranger seemed to be pretty polite to me, the problem is with the law enforcement policies. these guys go into a thousand briefings a year about how everybody is a suspect and terrorists are making WMDs in their basements, they are forced to do this shit otherwise they are demoted or fired, and in the case of some other departments maybe even imprisonment. the problem is in the politicians and their masters
I don't see any point in engaging in political or constitutional debates with police. If people want to do it, that's there choice. But, I've come to the conclusion it's a waste of time. You know the expression "pearls before swine?" I just say, "I invoke my right to remain silent" and wait for them to go away. I don't think it's ever a good idea to talk to the police.
Great job, sanderson1611. Thanks for standing up for your rights, because you are standing up for mine too by refusing to answer those questions and refuse illegal searches.
I support what you guys do in a really big way and hope that you always avoid convictions if not arrests. ... FYI from inside the police are you are no longer in a "public space" and filming could be not legal ... you can film from outside the car in or inside to the out as long as the car is in a public place but not from inside the car filming the inside of the car. Again I am just giving law as I know it regaurdless of how I think it should be!
This officer was clearly quite misguided and misinformed, but I think he had good intentions, correction, I don't think he had bad intentions. This is more of a problem with training and lack of knowledge. With that said, ignorance is no excuse. It is actually pretty good to hear that the officer actually listened to you instead of just yelling and telling you to be quiet.
"I stop a lot of people and most aren't guilty of anything". WELL NO SHIT CLETUS there's your fucking problem, asshole. You're NOT supposed to just randomly stop FREE PEOPLE with no suspicion of anything. 2 mph over the speed limit isn't cause to say someone is hauling a WMD. You fucking red neck jackass C- average mother fucker. No wonder they hired your stupid fucking ass, you'll oppress your fellow man and actually BELIEVE you're appreciated? What a shit stain. SubvertedNation/net
72 in a 70? And this dipshit pulled him over for that? Man alive, this is simply insane. Listen to him start to describe his job, and ramble into "mass destruction balls", then swerve between his job is looking for criminals and keeping people safe. Can't make us his mind. God save us all.
Being stopped just so cops can go on a "fishing expedition" is what the police do in POLICE STATES. The question is this; who is going to keep the people "safe" from POLICE STATISM?!? That cop is NOT keeping people safe; he's no different from the KGB and Gestapo and the RCMP. He's violating peoples' rights.
@FatPigCypris Didn't you hear the cop? "I need you to turn it off for my safety." In several US states it's illegal now to record cops "on duty". If the bastards aren't doing something wrong, what do THEY have to fear?!?!
Sadly this is how stupid most cops are even if they don't sound that way.
They take this job because they're not smart enough to do anything else. I mean lets face it, its not a high paying gig. I say less cops that are better. And a well armed and educated citizenry to protect each other so people don't have to rely on government policy enforcers to protect us from the demons of their own creation.
ROFL!!!!!!....They need to make cops in any state (especially in Texas) take IQ tests...this Texan is sounds soooooo stupid I am picking up my jaw off the floor from how dumb he sounds.
ps...I liked the cop. His character and manner was excellent. He even sounded empathetic. He's probably just following his training. He didn't seem at all vindictive or spiteful.
72 in a 70. Pathetic. You stood up for your rights well, my American cousin. This is the attitude that made America great....don't let them take it from you.
This shit is fucking wrong!!!!! even the fucking immigrations stops its wrong they must be at the border doing their job over there the must agents at the BORDER the must secure will be it doesn't make sense this shit at all.
If you are a Baptist Pastor, your not setting a very good example. If you had just cooperated, done what you were asked, and answered a few simple questions, you'd be on your way. Your tone and attitude are what keeps you in trouble. How can you win someone to Christ with that attitude?
@mtmassociate what does religious have to do with our constitution? he legally can refuse to answer questions he does NOT have to answer where he is going . he was never in trouble only the driver broke the law. good luck being pushed around by the cops why dont u just give up all ur rights?
i just find this so hilarious that this cop gets owned by a guy in his own police car. like handing a guy a neck, putting it against his neck and then calling you the dumbass
Ok so Im a USMC combat vet, I fought for and swore oath to the constitution, I am so very proud of the "people" for preforming their duty as U.S citizens and questioning authority. know your rights!!! VOTE RON PAUL AND THIS BS WILL HOPEFULLY STOP.
this cop was a dope like just about every damn cop in texas.. but i tell you what... they get even more fucking retarded when you hit the el paso area and along i 10 on through arizona
" He was going 72 in a 70"... so you pulled him over? I set the cruise control 5-7 over in my turbo Subaru every day and pass officers and they never pull me over. This guy was hunting for stuff which is clear when you listen to this conversation go in circles.
i would have tazed u and beat u too if i was the police. these KIDS have no respect for adults nevermind athority. its not that hard to coopperate, and say yes sir, or no sir, u little punks. youll get yours one day
@MegaPAC85 said: "i would have tazed u and beat u too if i was the police."
Then you would have faced charges for assault and under color of law, and battery once you touched him. Then probably a civil suit since your lawless behaviors would be caught on tape.
Sad that this is a man of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA who is so weak minded and spineless that he only want's to keep his job instead of doing what is right.Right for himself and those of us.He is so brainwashed with patriot act bullsh!t, that he can't even behave like a human being.He said "people are glad that he and others behave that way to keep them safe." He doesn't even compute that many others find it wrong. Wrong because he assumes people are guilty until they convince him they aren't.
I am not a christian person but I agree with your message. But yes I live in texas where 287, I-40, and i27 meet I am a wrecker driver and you wont BELIEVE the kinda of things they find.
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA XDDDDD I LOVE THIS GUY'S ARGUEMENT...And so this cop thinks he is looking for WMD's? When his job is simply to say WHAT he has done wrong and then give him a ticket instead of pulling him over and asking him if he has been doing anything illegal or if he has any federal illegal materials...etc...yeah...so he should just give him the fngticket, shut up, and leave.....fuck this shit!!! I'd rather live in China right now!!! AND IM FNG SERIOUS...yes, I said it. Cant wait :D!
THIS is how shit started in Nazi GERMANY , economic crisis raise of Hitler the savior (in USA government) and all the wars USA is in same scenario they are using in USA
I am now sorry I did not watch the entire video before my first comment. Why did you allow the EMBECILE who thinks he is a cop, to give you a warning ticket? He was clearly in the wrong for pulling you over and you handled the whole event perfectly. He had no right asking you or giving you anything. You could have cited him easily.
These officers are so indoctrinated by their training that they don't seem to even realise that what they are doing is illegal. They have been taught that they should illegally search people and that any resistance is a crime. It is time for the People to retrain these idiots that we have no obligation to consent to searches and they have to educate themselves on our rights.
Tbh that shade isnt too bad..he wasnt looking for trouble.if there was an officer that was looking for trouble you should have gone crazy at the cunt..FTS DIRTY RATS.
"If you have reasonable and articulable suspicion or probable cause to believe that I am headed somewhere to commit a mala in se crime, that is to create or cause harm, loss, injury, violation of a primary right or breach of the peace, then articulate such to me and I'll happily answer your question. Otherwise, your question is intrusive and without basis and there is no lawful obligation for me to answer it. So which is it, sir?"
That procedure is used all across this nation every day, and has been allowed by court rulings for years. It has been attacked from all angles by anti LE people, and groups. It is constitutionally sound, and just because annotated video segments call it a violation of someone's rights, DOESN'T MEAN IT IS.
I saw nothing wrong with what this cop did in this video. I don't just take the word of the poster. The video shows a cop doing his job. You don't like it? vote for change.
im amazed when ppl admit to breaking the law and then complain about bein stoped and questioned only to be let go witha warning. they say things like oh well i was only doing this or only doin that and dont feel i should have to prove my innocence.
amazing. how many hard core criminals get caught cuz they get stoped for minor law breakin. how restricting do these ppl want the cops to do their job with?
if u dont want to talk dont talk. if u dont want to allow searchin, then dont consent. smpl
@ReticentBadger: People looking for a police state will find everything cops do as incroachment on their liberties. Of course they can find a few examples here and there, but it is the same fallacy that blacks find when they claim "police brutality". They take a few extreme examples and then attach all police activity to the same label.
In this case the preacher is seeking an argument with the cop, and accuses the cop of unconstitutional behavior. The cop succeeds in garnering the info anyway.
I was actually agreeing with the civilian up until he started going into the conspiracy theory about Mcveigh @ about 8:55. The civilian was right to refuse to answer any questions, and thus provide ammunition for prosecution, BUT that was the end of my watching any further.
Advice: quite while you're ahead. The cop was obviously trying to garner furthur information, and this civilian was giving him TONS of information. Might aas well wear a sign on your head saying "keep an eye on me".
So I unkawfully ask people to prove their innocence when I ask them where they are going. ill make sure to never ask my friends where they are GOING. its not that big of a deal you are being a cry . My point is yes he doesnt have to answer the cop but anderson is doing this all for show because hes a prick. If I didn't WANTanswer him I simply wouldn't answer him anderson is the only prick oin this video
@Pafoofnik1: Although I fundamentally agree that the cops was trying to gain information, you are technically wrong about the questioning being "illegal". The cop has every legal authority to stop someone speeding, even if it is insignificant, and ask common questions. Now keep reading before you start responding with any anger towards me..
The cop would be wrong if his SOLE reason for stopping people was to determine destination, and whether someone had illegal possessions. Just don't answer.
@Pafoofnik1: Excuse me, but you stated "unlawfully required a person to prove his innocence". If you are trying to claim that you didn't state that the questioning itself was illegal, then fine. But you inferred it by your statements that the whole encounter was instigated by the abuse of power of the cop. Just like you are inferring when you suggest that I am an "idiot" without directly stating it. Which was a totally uncalled for, BTW. But I digress...
@Pafoofnik1: Right! The cop told the preacher what he was doing. He had every right to stop the violator, and inquire as to their motives. Police have the right to ask WHY you were breaking the law. Courtesy, and a little respect, might garner a simple warning.
"prove his innocence, or risk being illegally detained" <~Inferring illegality of the cops motives and questioning.
The cop was NOT extending the stop, the cop was explaining his reasoning, WHICH IS OFTEN REQUIRED BY MOST DEPARTMENTS.
@prancingdog said: "He had every right to stop the violator, and inquire as to their motives."
Mostly agreed. He had the 'authority' etc.
He did not have the authority to extend the stop just because the people were refusing to answer questions that did not pertain to the original reason for the stop.
Read up on Ramet v. State 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 19 June 4, 2009 for one of several decisions affirming this.
Then you said: "The cop was NOT extending the stop," Your opinion. I disagree.
@Pafoofnik1: The cop has the right to inquiry, the cop used that right of inquiry. You can use semantics to dance around it, but it matters not. The cop was doing his job by investigating in conjunction with a lawful stop. The officer retained the "authority" to arrest the driver if he so wished, and chose not to. But the officer has the "authority" to inquire as to the motives of those stopped to determine mitigating or aggravating circumstance. It's my opinion, and case law agrees with me.
@prancingdog said: "The cop has the right to inquiry, the cop used that right of inquiry."
I never said he couldn't. However he cannot detain based only on refusal to answer, and case law follows:
Once the purpose of a valid traffic stop has been completed and an officer's initial suspicions have been verified or dispelled, the detention must end unless there is additional reasonable suspicion supported by articulable facts. United States v. Machuca-Barrera, 261 F.3d 425, 434 (5th Cir.2001)
@Pafoofnik1: OKAY! You want me to quote you? FINE!
You typed: "He did not have the authority to extend the stop just because the people refused to answer questions that did not pertain to the original reason for the stop"
You ALSO typed: "He is asking the person to prove his innocence, or risk being illegally detained."
AND you typed: "However he cannot detain based only on refusal to answer,.."
I seriously doubt you have a good relationship with the officers you claim to know very well. I think you are trying to save whatever justification you are failing to express in regards to this video. You most certainly have a relationship with every cop you encounter. i suspect you salivate when you see a cop approaching the window because you are sure you didn't do anything wrong.
And you keep saying you have the right to not answer, BUT YOU PEOPLE ANSWER. Funny.
@prancingdog: Please keep to the facts. I never said I know them well, I said "I know most all of them professionally."
The rest of your comments are simple ad-hominem attacks. Please understand. It's not personal. I am simply debating the facts. I have absolutely no interest in your personal opinion of me or what you think my motives are.
Officer Buhba
Maxantium 16 hours ago
Keep doing what your are doing Pastor
Maxantium 16 hours ago
GOOD VIDEO WORK
Maxantium 16 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Can anyone tell me if we have a right to defend ourselves against overzealous and abusive police officers with deadly force if we perceive them to be a THREAT TO US CITIZENS ? IF so is there a LAW or STATUTE allowing CITIZENS TO USE DEADLY FORCE to protect themselves from such BRUTALITY ?
Maxantium 16 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i am surprised he didn't call in back up... well i guess he couldn't he never even put it in the system till the end. and if he did they would be like why you stop them.... "He was runnin a 72 in a 70!!"
skuloop 5 days ago
72 in a 70? SLOW DOWN! You trying to kill somebody?? Any faster and your kia will gain lift. safety first, teamwork second.
banihex 5 days ago
so let's say if they were, in fact, terrorists.......so the cop asks where they are going, he's going to say "We're going down here with these WMDs in our trunk to blow some people up....are we free to go?" I mean, come on.
TexDad1971 2 weeks ago
@TexDad1971 very good point, if these guys were truly scared, they would NOT wanna be walking up to these people.
skuloop 5 days ago
cops think they are doing the right thing because they are taught that way, but they need to know that they wipe their asses with The Constitution.....without even realizing it.
TexDad1971 2 weeks ago
"He was runnin a 72 in a 70!!"
bigbadklev 2 weeks ago 2
lmao mass destruction bomb were in a kia
blohm85 2 weeks ago
I can comment all day on this video!! This cop def does not look like the brightest Crayon in the box. Thank God they choose the not so smart people to be cops
rayndalrenfrow 2 weeks ago
72 in a 70! In the middle of no where Texas! People are falling to sleep because you have to drive 70 through Texas even though there is only a straight highway in the middle of nowhere. Should be like the Autobahn.
rayndalrenfrow 2 weeks ago
According to Macgyver a stick of gum and a paper clip is bomb material so can I get caught for that. Is every cop trained in knowing how to make a bomb so they can arrest the right "bomb makers"? Seems to me that if every cop knows how to make a bomb then they should be on the "no fly" list
rayndalrenfrow 2 weeks ago
LMAO!!!!! "MASS DESTRUCTION BOMB?? WE ARE IN A KIA!!!" JUST THAT QUOTE GIVES THIS VIDEO A 10
rayndalrenfrow 2 weeks ago
This is just another example of how local police have become Federalized and are giving us obedience training. The ratchet is tightening all around us. I think the Texas trooper knows deep down that he is wrong and he'll likely do some soul searching of his own. I've seen all your videos and have learned a lot of things about what I will do when I'm stopped. God bless you preacher man. Don't give an inch
waikikibeech 2 weeks ago
Why the hell was the driver in the front seat of the Troopers car ?? That is very unusual without handcuffed and Trooper not even in the car with him ? Anybody want to comment bout this ?/
bnetx1 2 weeks ago
@bnetx1: I've been placed in the front seat of a Texas DPS car a couple of times. One time, he questioned me, then left me in his car while he questioned my wife in our truck to see if our stories matched. I guess he left me there because he knew of me and the fact that I've lived here some 30 years.
So, it's not unknown.
Interesting note was that my wife listened to our conversation on the scanner so knew what answers I gave before he asked her the same questions. Go figure.
Pafoofnik1 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"A mass destruction bomb? We're in a Kia.."
Best. Quote. Ever.
institutionalized66 2 weeks ago
"A mass destruction bomb? We're in a Kia.."
Best. Quote. Ever.
institutionalized66 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
fuislamtube 3 weeks ago
good video, thanks
fuislamtube 3 weeks ago
He might be a nice guy. However, He's still too much big brother for me. He pulled you over because of your license plate, and to check for contraband, not because he is soo concerned about going 72 in a 70 zone. That's obviously a trumped up excuse.
snarky77005 3 weeks ago
I like this cop because he is a human, he is voicing his opinions. I hate cops who say: "I'm sorry, I'm not permitted to give any opinions." They are robots!
This man was a breath of fresh air.
WarThug13 3 weeks ago
AH the sweet smell of corruption yet again
bhuddahigh 3 weeks ago
We don't know who's hauling mass destruction bombs. You think we're hauling mass destruction bombs, we're in IKEA! LOL!
InferiorThanYou 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
ShawnsterVideos 1 month ago
While Cletus had you stopped there, Beau and Luke probably made it safely back to Uncle Jesse's. (what utter nonsense)
randrews02809 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@randrews02809 I completely agree. Anderson refused to answer questions then continues to talk "...in a Kia", "looking for crime... searching for problems... we're not involved in any crime right now.. police state..." -
He's GIVING INFORMATION. He offers "I'm a Baptist pastor..." then proceeds to provide voluntary information about his border beat down! Then he instigates conversation about the OK bombings? That's crazy.
Anderson, you voluntarily squealed like a baby for 13 minutes.
ShawnsterVideos 1 month ago
72 in a 70, 72 in a 70, 72 in a 70?!?!? WTF?!?
AllUnderOdinsBanner 1 month ago
if i ever talked to the cops like that where i live , i wouldnt be typing this
bikerty67 1 month ago
I'm a good ol' southern boy... and a cop. But his accent is what's making him sound stupid, not what he's sayin. I hope thats not what I sound like.
HitmanofHeaven 1 month ago
@HitmanofHeaven For having a user name like this and being a cop, you are subject for legal punishment.
InferiorThanYou 4 weeks ago
Seemed liked a good cop.
myevilprophecy 1 month ago
Comment removed
myevilprophecy 1 month ago
If a policeman asked me where I was going, I think I would tell him, unless I was a criminal or an arsehole.
philkill1984 1 month ago
@philkill1984 Why is it anyones business where you are going and what you are doing? Is he still a juvenile still living in his mommy and daddies house? The cop seems like a nice guy......but I understand what the pastor is trying to stand up against.........used to be a few bad apples in power now it is only a few good apples in power
XJT1972X 1 month ago
@XJT1972X its not anyones business where he is going. I still think the pastor is an arsehole though, he just prolonged the situation wasting both his own time, his friends and the coppers.... maybe I don't understand because I am not American.
philkill1984 1 month ago
@philkill1984 The pastor is sticking up for our constitutional right to free travel and illegal searches and seizers.....It is not about just being american......FREEDOM should be a WORLD wide RIGHT...and people are trampling on those rights because to many of us just roll over like a dog and piss on our leg so we dont get beat. EVERYONE around the world should STAND UP for there personal GOD given RIGHTS!!!! PEACE and FREEDOM can work in HARMONY!
XJT1972X 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@XJT1972X lol
philkill1984 1 month ago
see what you guys fail to see is that some cops are not assholes on a powertrip, that ranger seemed to be pretty polite to me, the problem is with the law enforcement policies. these guys go into a thousand briefings a year about how everybody is a suspect and terrorists are making WMDs in their basements, they are forced to do this shit otherwise they are demoted or fired, and in the case of some other departments maybe even imprisonment. the problem is in the politicians and their masters
SoldierCyfix 1 month ago
wmd in a kia!?!? wow!
dorothydorothy111 1 month ago
A CIVIL SERVANTS "JOB" IS TO SERVE & PROTECT!!! NOT A DAM THING BEYOND THAT!
613Unknown 1 month ago
Steve..do you have any friends at all?..Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha!
liw213 1 month ago
sanderson you the man buddy
sodbuster925 1 month ago
I don't see any point in engaging in political or constitutional debates with police. If people want to do it, that's there choice. But, I've come to the conclusion it's a waste of time. You know the expression "pearls before swine?" I just say, "I invoke my right to remain silent" and wait for them to go away. I don't think it's ever a good idea to talk to the police.
greggh 1 month ago
Cop seemed like a good guy, but he's not fit to be in an officer since he doesn't seem to be able to think for himself, wmds in a car?
Daazbee 1 month ago
This fucking cop is a cum swallowing butt monkey....he can eat shit and die! Another bully with a badge.....
joecoool100 2 months ago
@joecoool100 He didn't bully him at all O_e Calm down. I hate abusive cops too but this guy was one of the good apples in authority.
AmongDancingZombies 1 month ago
I think the Police Officer soon realises how nuts this guy is lol
weedster999 2 months ago
normally id say you guys are twats, but seriously WMD!! in texas in a kia?? omg! r u kidding me? talk scrape the bottom of the barrel!! wat a wanker!
waynebaxter1977 2 months ago
Great job, sanderson1611. Thanks for standing up for your rights, because you are standing up for mine too by refusing to answer those questions and refuse illegal searches.
13thFlor 2 months ago
'We're in a KIA' HAHAHA
doucedinpiss 2 months ago
Mr. Anderson, you are a clown!
support4thp 2 months ago
Apparently a KIA is on the FBI's most wanted terrorist car list.
slugers05 2 months ago
I support what you guys do in a really big way and hope that you always avoid convictions if not arrests. ... FYI from inside the police are you are no longer in a "public space" and filming could be not legal ... you can film from outside the car in or inside to the out as long as the car is in a public place but not from inside the car filming the inside of the car. Again I am just giving law as I know it regaurdless of how I think it should be!
TheRandyMajor 2 months ago
haha the cop should be sited for that huge crack in his window
thezombiekiller87 2 months ago
that cop sounds ridiculously stupid
F1RZT2BOMB 2 months ago
This officer was clearly quite misguided and misinformed, but I think he had good intentions, correction, I don't think he had bad intentions. This is more of a problem with training and lack of knowledge. With that said, ignorance is no excuse. It is actually pretty good to hear that the officer actually listened to you instead of just yelling and telling you to be quiet.
bones343 2 months ago 4
this is one of the stupidest fukin cops holy crap
JEHERETIC 2 months ago
Don't bust the cops balls just for asking the question. You shouldn't have to answer, but for gods sake, let him do his job.
josww2 2 months ago
im so glad i dont live in texas
stealthgerm 3 months ago
this is hilarious!!!! i would like to see that redneck cop sometime
ElPajaroMexicano 3 months ago
if you say your a U.S. citizen your toast, if you say your born "in" somewhere your toast. Just say i don't consent and move on.
cdimmm 3 months ago
@cdimmm And get a bullet in your back?
KaptKan1 3 months ago
That trooper wasn't so bad. It was still wrong though.
ElGatoLoco698 3 months ago
"I stop a lot of people and most aren't guilty of anything". WELL NO SHIT CLETUS there's your fucking problem, asshole. You're NOT supposed to just randomly stop FREE PEOPLE with no suspicion of anything. 2 mph over the speed limit isn't cause to say someone is hauling a WMD. You fucking red neck jackass C- average mother fucker. No wonder they hired your stupid fucking ass, you'll oppress your fellow man and actually BELIEVE you're appreciated? What a shit stain. SubvertedNation/net
911wuzjews 3 months ago
72 in a 70? And this dipshit pulled him over for that? Man alive, this is simply insane. Listen to him start to describe his job, and ramble into "mass destruction balls", then swerve between his job is looking for criminals and keeping people safe. Can't make us his mind. God save us all.
Ken4Pyro 3 months ago
i respect this cop because he was very polite the whole time. But i also understand the pastors views as well. :)
Dethxstalkerx 3 months ago
@Dethxstalkerx I don't respect anyone who's trying to take my rights away and fuck me over. I don't care how polite they are about it, fuck him.
911wuzjews 3 months ago 2
@Dethxstalkerx I don't respect any thug, no matter how "politely" he violates my rights when he knows he's being recorded on video.
KaptKan1 3 months ago
Being stopped just so cops can go on a "fishing expedition" is what the police do in POLICE STATES. The question is this; who is going to keep the people "safe" from POLICE STATISM?!? That cop is NOT keeping people safe; he's no different from the KGB and Gestapo and the RCMP. He's violating peoples' rights.
KaptKan1 3 months ago
Comment removed
KaptKan1 3 months ago
PWND
fabiuh991 3 months ago
Good thing people have Iphones now so they can record the police abuse out there.
FatPigCypris 3 months ago
@FatPigCypris Didn't you hear the cop? "I need you to turn it off for my safety." In several US states it's illegal now to record cops "on duty". If the bastards aren't doing something wrong, what do THEY have to fear?!?!
KaptKan1 3 months ago
@KaptKan1 It may be illegal but i can assure you it is not unlawful/
cdimmm 3 months ago
Sadly this is how stupid most cops are even if they don't sound that way.
They take this job because they're not smart enough to do anything else. I mean lets face it, its not a high paying gig. I say less cops that are better. And a well armed and educated citizenry to protect each other so people don't have to rely on government policy enforcers to protect us from the demons of their own creation.
jonnypants320 3 months ago
"Hey we don't know whose haulin mass destruction balls"?? Is that what he says at 0:45??? WTF are mass destruction balls?
thehaggardartist 3 months ago
ROFL!!!!!!....They need to make cops in any state (especially in Texas) take IQ tests...this Texan is sounds soooooo stupid I am picking up my jaw off the floor from how dumb he sounds.
centralhousing 4 months ago
Scary that people this dam stupid and ignorant are police officers....
Fotoboyvi 4 months ago
hahahah the look he gave the dude in the car towards the end was priceless!!
northbendsk8 4 months ago
I thought this guy was onto something before he got into the horseshit with the OKC bombing.
canaanav 4 months ago
The cop is saying that he doesn't agree with what the government is doing and yet he is doing it himself.
Attila226 4 months ago
This cop is a stump-dumb, full-throttle moron.
1GodOnlyOne 4 months ago
poor cop..........lol
sablemase 4 months ago
I really cannot believe he talked to you that long calmly still trying to sneak in questions hoping to catch you off guard.
DJMC5ive 4 months ago
This was sad but funny... Tyranny is here now.. This isn't funny, Search YouTube for: police state tsa vipr
lidar532 4 months ago
Annnnnd ... in less than 4.5 minutes, we hit Godwin's Law.
As far as I'm concerned, he lost his argument right then - until that moment, he had me on his side.
parkerwolf8 4 months ago
ps...I liked the cop. His character and manner was excellent. He even sounded empathetic. He's probably just following his training. He didn't seem at all vindictive or spiteful.
wesmatron 4 months ago
72 in a 70. Pathetic. You stood up for your rights well, my American cousin. This is the attitude that made America great....don't let them take it from you.
wesmatron 4 months ago
@ 2:47 he almost calls the cop an idiot, lmao
BeastmodeKes 4 months ago
This shit is fucking wrong!!!!! even the fucking immigrations stops its wrong they must be at the border doing their job over there the must agents at the BORDER the must secure will be it doesn't make sense this shit at all.
sonico73 4 months ago
OWNED !!!!!!! I LOVE THIS.... I WANT MORE!
rcacad 4 months ago
If you are a Baptist Pastor, your not setting a very good example. If you had just cooperated, done what you were asked, and answered a few simple questions, you'd be on your way. Your tone and attitude are what keeps you in trouble. How can you win someone to Christ with that attitude?
mtmassociate 5 months ago
@mtmassociate: A person should not have to give up his rights on demand.
Pafoofnik1 5 months ago
@mtmassociate what does religious have to do with our constitution? he legally can refuse to answer questions he does NOT have to answer where he is going . he was never in trouble only the driver broke the law. good luck being pushed around by the cops why dont u just give up all ur rights?
bossman12334 5 months ago
i just find this so hilarious that this cop gets owned by a guy in his own police car. like handing a guy a neck, putting it against his neck and then calling you the dumbass
amaiagi 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ok so Im a USMC combat vet, I fought for and swore oath to the constitution, I am so very proud of the "people" for preforming their duty as U.S citizens and questioning authority. know your rights!!! VOTE RON PAUL AND THIS BS WILL HOPEFULLY STOP.
RON PAUL, RON PAUL, RON PAUL, REVOLUTION!!!!!!
rjholstrom 5 months ago
I enjoyed this video. I like how you stood your ground with the police, yet remained cool and collected and informed the officer on your position.
gorillaMaticIAP 5 months ago
I wont claim to be the smartest fellow in the word nor will I admit to being the dumbest.
Could someone smarter than me tell me what HYDRAS and how it can be used as a WMD?
toolmkr1 5 months ago
this cop was a dope like just about every damn cop in texas.. but i tell you what... they get even more fucking retarded when you hit the el paso area and along i 10 on through arizona
nightdevil6666 5 months ago
thes is not only in USA now look denmark got more strite camp en england now
fejlpost 5 months ago
hilarious when cop tells driver to turn off phone for his safety. driver replied, "this is for MY safety". cop speechless!!!!!!
kikidee31 5 months ago
" He was going 72 in a 70"... so you pulled him over? I set the cruise control 5-7 over in my turbo Subaru every day and pass officers and they never pull me over. This guy was hunting for stuff which is clear when you listen to this conversation go in circles.
Sp33dyD3m0n 5 months ago
i like how the old peoples are taking shit that kid say so seriously they r kids!
JoeyBissett 5 months ago
looooooooool kia !!!
AboJaffarAlmansor 5 months ago
i would have tazed u and beat u too if i was the police. these KIDS have no respect for adults nevermind athority. its not that hard to coopperate, and say yes sir, or no sir, u little punks. youll get yours one day
MegaPAC85 5 months ago
@MegaPAC85 said: "i would have tazed u and beat u too if i was the police."
Then you would have faced charges for assault and under color of law, and battery once you touched him. Then probably a civil suit since your lawless behaviors would be caught on tape.
Pafoofnik1 5 months ago 9
Sad that this is a man of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA who is so weak minded and spineless that he only want's to keep his job instead of doing what is right.Right for himself and those of us.He is so brainwashed with patriot act bullsh!t, that he can't even behave like a human being.He said "people are glad that he and others behave that way to keep them safe." He doesn't even compute that many others find it wrong. Wrong because he assumes people are guilty until they convince him they aren't.
44truefalse 6 months ago
by the way, if you have never actually read the constitution or the bill of rights, you should get on that. its a great read!!
rman12117 6 months ago
only 3 phrases you need to know when dealing with the police:
am i free to go?
i do not consent to searches.
i will not answer any questions without an attorney present.
hurray for knowing your rights!!
rman12117 6 months ago
I am not a christian person but I agree with your message. But yes I live in texas where 287, I-40, and i27 meet I am a wrecker driver and you wont BELIEVE the kinda of things they find.
philipdiller 6 months ago
U no what would suck??? If they did have something illegal!!
MrJrromero3 6 months ago
ITS TIME TO BBQ SOME F'N PIGS!!!
LTL220 6 months ago
Thanks again for what you are doing. I think you may have even made the thug of the state even think for about 2 seconds.
glad777 6 months ago
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA XDDDDD I LOVE THIS GUY'S ARGUEMENT...And so this cop thinks he is looking for WMD's? When his job is simply to say WHAT he has done wrong and then give him a ticket instead of pulling him over and asking him if he has been doing anything illegal or if he has any federal illegal materials...etc...yeah...so he should just give him the fngticket, shut up, and leave.....fuck this shit!!! I'd rather live in China right now!!! AND IM FNG SERIOUS...yes, I said it. Cant wait :D!
j123451234512345 6 months ago
72 MPH in a 70 zone... going to jail...
johnnybagofdonets 6 months ago
What other people are doing is not cause to stop someone.
JRBeaman 6 months ago
Going 72 in a 70 is cause?
The cops are fishing, just like Hitlers goons.
JRBeaman 6 months ago 10
THIS is how shit started in Nazi GERMANY , economic crisis raise of Hitler the savior (in USA government) and all the wars USA is in same scenario they are using in USA
same thing. Read it.
aviomaster 6 months ago
good video. both parties seem to both make valid points.
JKENT66 6 months ago
@JKENT66 agreed
LunatrixEX 6 months ago
The police state of America is getting insane. They do what they want when they want to whomever they want.
MrBillholden1969 6 months ago
Is that thar hat standard issue? People need to start suing for harassment every time !
YoginJ 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this guy is an idiot, law enforcement keeps him safe, i think he just drive's around and antogonizes them to get a response, get a real
ccmmaltby 6 months ago
this guy is an idiot, law enforcement keeps him safe, i think he just drive's around and antogonizes them to get a response, get a real job
ccmmaltby 6 months ago
Did u hear 72 in a 70??
MrJrromero3 6 months ago
God blessbu both..
MrJrromero3 6 months ago
them kia man thats a terrorist car jk
50TNCSA 6 months ago
I am now sorry I did not watch the entire video before my first comment. Why did you allow the EMBECILE who thinks he is a cop, to give you a warning ticket? He was clearly in the wrong for pulling you over and you handled the whole event perfectly. He had no right asking you or giving you anything. You could have cited him easily.
mozartgenetics 6 months ago
These officers are so indoctrinated by their training that they don't seem to even realise that what they are doing is illegal. They have been taught that they should illegally search people and that any resistance is a crime. It is time for the People to retrain these idiots that we have no obligation to consent to searches and they have to educate themselves on our rights.
mozartgenetics 6 months ago
Pulled over for doing 72 in a 70. Seriously!
mikef4irider 7 months ago
thats a good cop i dont care what anybody says
grizzleybearz282004 7 months ago
@McDank805 Anderson is a judgemental prick but atlest he has the balls to stand up for what he belives in.
stone8675309 7 months ago
We're in a Kia is the best line ever!
ibpointless2 7 months ago
This cop seems like a good person.Anderson is an asshole but he has a point and is onlt exercising his rights.
stone8675309 7 months ago
Tbh that shade isnt too bad..he wasnt looking for trouble.if there was an officer that was looking for trouble you should have gone crazy at the cunt..FTS DIRTY RATS.
Pats4life14 7 months ago
Is this one of those Westboro Baptist people that protest at soldiers funerals?
degenret01 7 months ago
Those two totally owned that cop... just as it should be.
scrm1 7 months ago
great job... those pigs are dummy..
AnimetimeTV 7 months ago
"If you have reasonable and articulable suspicion or probable cause to believe that I am headed somewhere to commit a mala in se crime, that is to create or cause harm, loss, injury, violation of a primary right or breach of the peace, then articulate such to me and I'll happily answer your question. Otherwise, your question is intrusive and without basis and there is no lawful obligation for me to answer it. So which is it, sir?"
Echelon2600 7 months ago
Sanderson is fantastic!!.
martinez418 7 months ago
That procedure is used all across this nation every day, and has been allowed by court rulings for years. It has been attacked from all angles by anti LE people, and groups. It is constitutionally sound, and just because annotated video segments call it a violation of someone's rights, DOESN'T MEAN IT IS.
I saw nothing wrong with what this cop did in this video. I don't just take the word of the poster. The video shows a cop doing his job. You don't like it? vote for change.
ReticentBadger 7 months ago
Anybody defending that cop and that procedure is a complete fucking moron.
jasonresler 7 months ago
Wow! 72 in 70 m.p.h. zone! And in a Kia? Man that's awful al Qeada-like.
clayrains 7 months ago
fuck this cunt he deserves a beating how do u even get the tittle pastor
BUZZEY15 7 months ago 2
I was sympathizing with the cop until "turn it off for my safety." STFU, moron.
HitfulVids 7 months ago
im amazed when ppl admit to breaking the law and then complain about bein stoped and questioned only to be let go witha warning. they say things like oh well i was only doing this or only doin that and dont feel i should have to prove my innocence.
amazing. how many hard core criminals get caught cuz they get stoped for minor law breakin. how restricting do these ppl want the cops to do their job with?
if u dont want to talk dont talk. if u dont want to allow searchin, then dont consent. smpl
ReticentBadger 7 months ago
@ReticentBadger: People looking for a police state will find everything cops do as incroachment on their liberties. Of course they can find a few examples here and there, but it is the same fallacy that blacks find when they claim "police brutality". They take a few extreme examples and then attach all police activity to the same label.
In this case the preacher is seeking an argument with the cop, and accuses the cop of unconstitutional behavior. The cop succeeds in garnering the info anyway.
prancingdog 7 months ago
Did he just say mass destruction bomb?
TheTopBloke 7 months ago
I was actually agreeing with the civilian up until he started going into the conspiracy theory about Mcveigh @ about 8:55. The civilian was right to refuse to answer any questions, and thus provide ammunition for prosecution, BUT that was the end of my watching any further.
Advice: quite while you're ahead. The cop was obviously trying to garner furthur information, and this civilian was giving him TONS of information. Might aas well wear a sign on your head saying "keep an eye on me".
prancingdog 7 months ago
So I unkawfully ask people to prove their innocence when I ask them where they are going. ill make sure to never ask my friends where they are GOING. its not that big of a deal you are being a cry . My point is yes he doesnt have to answer the cop but anderson is doing this all for show because hes a prick. If I didn't WANTanswer him I simply wouldn't answer him anderson is the only prick oin this video
jared1144 7 months ago
Kudos to the cop for keeping his cool and being an honest (if a bit stupid)
Kudos to the priest for keeping his cool and not being an antagonistic asshole who thinks he was born with all the same birth rights as God himself.
LemSayblem344546 7 months ago
Pafoofnik you my friend are an idiot if you dont think anderson isnt causing a scene
jared1144 7 months ago
@jared1144; The officer instigated the escalation at 00:33 when he unlawfully required a person to prove his innocence.
At 00:44, the officer attempted guilt by association.
At 00:58, he admits that they ask people to prove their innocence "all the time".
At 2;26, the officer shows that he doesn't understand the concept of presumption of innocence.
I've also been interrogated like this by DPS, because I didn't wish to discuss my affairs. Interrogated for doing something completely legal.
Pafoofnik1 7 months ago
@Pafoofnik1: Although I fundamentally agree that the cops was trying to gain information, you are technically wrong about the questioning being "illegal". The cop has every legal authority to stop someone speeding, even if it is insignificant, and ask common questions. Now keep reading before you start responding with any anger towards me..
The cop would be wrong if his SOLE reason for stopping people was to determine destination, and whether someone had illegal possessions. Just don't answer.
prancingdog 7 months ago
@prancingdog said: "you are technically wrong about the questioning being "illegal". "
I never said it was.
Of course they can 'ask'. Of course people can decline to answer.
Why should I respond in anger towards you? I don't even know you. Certainly not enough to, say, call you an idiot or something.
I'm interested in the truth, and what's lawful.
Pafoofnik1 7 months ago
@Pafoofnik1: Excuse me, but you stated "unlawfully required a person to prove his innocence". If you are trying to claim that you didn't state that the questioning itself was illegal, then fine. But you inferred it by your statements that the whole encounter was instigated by the abuse of power of the cop. Just like you are inferring when you suggest that I am an "idiot" without directly stating it. Which was a totally uncalled for, BTW. But I digress...
The stop was Constitutionally sound.
prancingdog 7 months ago
@prancingdog: The officer said: "... just seeing where you are going. Make sure there's no criminal activity."
He is asking the person to prove his innocence, or risk being illegally detained.
Now you say: "But you inferred it". This is an incorrect statement. You have no idea what I inferred.
And you said: "The stop was Constitutionally sound."
Agreed. The stop no longer was constitutionally sound if it was extended beyond the time needed to process the original violation.
Pafoofnik1 7 months ago
@Pafoofnik1: Right! The cop told the preacher what he was doing. He had every right to stop the violator, and inquire as to their motives. Police have the right to ask WHY you were breaking the law. Courtesy, and a little respect, might garner a simple warning.
"prove his innocence, or risk being illegally detained" <~Inferring illegality of the cops motives and questioning.
The cop was NOT extending the stop, the cop was explaining his reasoning, WHICH IS OFTEN REQUIRED BY MOST DEPARTMENTS.
prancingdog 7 months ago
@prancingdog said: "He had every right to stop the violator, and inquire as to their motives."
Mostly agreed. He had the 'authority' etc.
He did not have the authority to extend the stop just because the people were refusing to answer questions that did not pertain to the original reason for the stop.
Read up on Ramet v. State 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 19 June 4, 2009 for one of several decisions affirming this.
Then you said: "The cop was NOT extending the stop," Your opinion. I disagree.
Pafoofnik1 7 months ago
@Pafoofnik1: The cop has the right to inquiry, the cop used that right of inquiry. You can use semantics to dance around it, but it matters not. The cop was doing his job by investigating in conjunction with a lawful stop. The officer retained the "authority" to arrest the driver if he so wished, and chose not to. But the officer has the "authority" to inquire as to the motives of those stopped to determine mitigating or aggravating circumstance. It's my opinion, and case law agrees with me.
prancingdog 7 months ago
@prancingdog said: "The cop has the right to inquiry, the cop used that right of inquiry."
I never said he couldn't. However he cannot detain based only on refusal to answer, and case law follows:
Once the purpose of a valid traffic stop has been completed and an officer's initial suspicions have been verified or dispelled, the detention must end unless there is additional reasonable suspicion supported by articulable facts. United States v. Machuca-Barrera, 261 F.3d 425, 434 (5th Cir.2001)
Pafoofnik1 7 months ago
@Pafoofnik1: It is YOUR opinion that the cop is detaining "only on refusal to answer".
I suspect that nothing has, or ever will, come of this stop. I hope Texas has more cops like this working it's police forces.
prancingdog 7 months ago
@prancingdog sais: "It is YOUR opinion that the cop is detaining "only on refusal to answer"."
Where did I say he detained only on refusal? Please comment on what I say, not what you think or hoped I said.
I hope Texas officers understand that I am perfectly free to remain mute when asked questions.
So far, they have been for the most part. Of course it may be because I know most all of them professionally.
Pafoofnik1 7 months ago
@Pafoofnik1: OKAY! You want me to quote you? FINE!
You typed: "He did not have the authority to extend the stop just because the people refused to answer questions that did not pertain to the original reason for the stop"
You ALSO typed: "He is asking the person to prove his innocence, or risk being illegally detained."
AND you typed: "However he cannot detain based only on refusal to answer,.."
Paranoid victimology: You seek trouble. Incite arguments. Proclaim self righteousness. (IMHO)
prancingdog 7 months ago
@Pafoofnik1: ADDITIONALLY...
I seriously doubt you have a good relationship with the officers you claim to know very well. I think you are trying to save whatever justification you are failing to express in regards to this video. You most certainly have a relationship with every cop you encounter. i suspect you salivate when you see a cop approaching the window because you are sure you didn't do anything wrong.
And you keep saying you have the right to not answer, BUT YOU PEOPLE ANSWER. Funny.
prancingdog 7 months ago
@prancingdog: Please keep to the facts. I never said I know them well, I said "I know most all of them professionally."
The rest of your comments are simple ad-hominem attacks. Please understand. It's not personal. I am simply debating the facts. I have absolutely no interest in your personal opinion of me or what you think my motives are.
Pafoofnik1 7 months ago