Added: 4 years ago
From: CaliChoice
Views: 5,897
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (76)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • LET'S make sure we can still drink our raw milk. It tastes better than almost anything else on earth! Whole raw milk.... TRY it!!! it's up their with foie gras and even surpasses caviar in taste.

  • He was on Boy Meets Boy

  • ...hmmm... now... what kind of MILK would a REAL farmer sell to the kids?... hmmm?

    ...seriously... hmmm... goddammit! ...all of this government bullshit is just designed to make the image of the farmer bad... HA?! ...because the banks and governments and etc. HATE and killed farmers... and it started with Lenin... and the Soviet Communists... and this brain fucking and mind raping continues to this day... hmmm... and this is just so some cocaine sniffing government official can play golf...

  • I drink raw milk

  • Arnold didnt drink milk. He said "milk is for babies"

  • Good job Dan, you Rock!!!!!!!!!

  • Can you please let me know where I can get the scientific studies that back up these claims. Thank you so much for your video, please pass the current standing of this law in California and elsewhere.. I just purchased Raw Milk in Pennsylvania and hope to check into this for the benefits of my clients.

  • @laurasIs2c Why don't you take the scientific studies and shove em up your ass you fukn slow ignorant lemming. Look at the chat boards, read what people have to say, not what corporate run studies say. Any 12 year old can do this. Why you do need a "study", fuck people are fukn retards!!! Sorry pal, I'm just sick of hearing dumb shit.

  • @howiboy Your impatient and rude comments are mean and nothing more. You do nothing to support the cause of keeping raw milk available. Sorry about your need to express or connect through such harshness. The man speaks of benefits, all I was suggesting is that he give the sources for his claims, there's no harm in that.

  • Often, that can take from 5-40 years or never, if our bodies do not receive proper nutrients. Therefore, idealistically, malignant tumors are preferable to benign tumors, as long as our bodies receive enough nutrients to neutralize and eliminate the tremendous amount of acrid waste resulting from the quick dissolution of malignant tumors. If our bodies cannot neutralize that waste, the waste can injure, damage and dissolve adjacent living cells.

  • The difference between benign and malignant tumors is dramatic. Our bodies, with the help of those young mutated (cancer) cells, can dissolve tumors rapidly, in 2 days to 5 years, depending on the size and number of tumors. Without the aid of cancer cells in benign tumors, most often our body must manufacture extra-cellular solvents to dissolve those benign tumors, from the outer edges inward, slowly.

  • Tumors are constructed as benign or malignant. In the case of malignant tumors, our bodies sparsely intermix live young cells with many times more of the embalmed cells. The young mutated cells are phenomenally designed to produce and contain potent solvents within themselves. Those young mutated cells have been termed by modern medicine as 'cancer' cells. In the case of benign tumors, or bodies do not incorporate those young cells that produce and contain dissolution compounds.

  • First, the embalmed cells are dispersed throughout our bodies, intermixed with live cells, sometimes creating thick fibroids. When our bodies reach the limit of their ability to tolerate so much dispersed dead cell structure, our bodies must construct tumors to contain the embalmed cells into a localized area so that the dead cells will have far less impact upon the function of living tissue; including various circulatory, organ & glandular processes.

  • When our bodies are overly contaminated with pollution and too deficient in vital nutrients; bacteria, parasites, fungi, nor virus can dissolve all of the dead and degenerated cells. At such a point the body must embalm those cells and contain them.

  • Unlike the reduction of waste performed by bacteria, parasites & fungi, the waste produced by viruses increases b/c viruses utilize volumes of H2O to dissolve and dilute dead & degenerative cells. That grossly toxic wastewater contaminates the various circulatory systems (blood, nervous and lymphatic), spreading the toxicity throughout the body. The actions of bacteria, parasites and fungi are always the most natural and preferred methods used by the body to detoxify dead and degenerative cells.

  • Why do host cells manufacture virus?

    B/c overly septic cells & concentrated synthetic composites often kill bacteria, parasites & fungi. When that occurs, our bodies no longer have the preferred assistance of those helpful agents in dissolving toxically sick or dead cells for elimination. Resultantly, our bodies resort to viruses to perform that task.

  • How do you get rid of Herpes ?

  • Bacteria, parasites & fungi consume degenerated & dead cells quickly, wherein the volume of waste compounds produced by their cleansing action constitutes a mere fraction of the volume of original toxic cells. In such instances it is then relatively easy for the body to eliminate that waste. The opposite is true w/ the action of viruses because viruses are crystalline solvents manufactured w/in poisonously toxic cells. The waste from viruses magnifies & grossly distributes throughout the body.

  • Whether before or after a tumor forms, dead & degenerative toxic cells must be dissolved & neutralized. The waste must be excreted and secreted. The body has two basic methods of dissolving those cells. The body's natural & first choice is the action of bacteria, parasites or fungi. Its second choice seems to be through the action of viruses.

  • Nice video, but BEGGING Government officials on our hands and knees is not the answer. Schwarzenegger would be laughing at you if he saw this video. The answer to dealing with these Nazi criminals is to get them out of office and just start breaking the so called laws they use to kill us off.

  • are you naturally stupid, or are you a moronbydesign?

  • if he wants to look out for the health of California citizens he would ban ALL milk, not just raw.

  • Thanks Stonewall, your name is becoming. We could forever use a little more dogma amidst our restrained status of worldly perceptions. Glad to see that we have knowledgeably-informed human organisms seated at their keyboard (such as yourself) that are so willing to discharge/expel emulated opinions from their measureless & immensely inadequate observations of human corporeal fleshly existence.

    Well, it's back to reading the China Study a few more times so that I can discount manifest reality!

  • I could post a long winded repy but simply put, you're a idiot

  • You could post a "repy", but you didn't. And should we suppose that intelligent organisms such as yourself are generally accustomed to incompetent grammatic phraseology like "a idiot"? ;)

    You're putting yourself out here w/ hackneyed commentary that fails to build into a crescendo of any value. Engage in civil dialogue. Let's support fly-by statements such as, "Milk is bad for you, raw or otherwise." Reveal the foundation beneath this statement regarding raw milk; bring some weight brother.

  • and you're intelligent, with your "repy"? Sorry for the grammar, you're AN idiot. Better? Do your own research and you'll discover why milk is bad for you. Stop watching TV with the "Milk does a body good" commercials.

  • TV? commercials?

    I've consumed raw milk from my personal herd of Jersey cattle for the last 6 years here in Lancaster PA. I have 6 years of weighty anecdotal evidence founded upon former dietary choices (8 years of raw vegan including former vegetarian of 6+ years prior to that). I also maintain volumes of research representing the verified clinical, peer-reviewed (and not to mention modern anecdotal evidence) supporting immense benefits of raw milk derived from ruminants on pasture/grass.

  • Again stonewall, (this name is truly befitting) I'm requesting some weighty responses from you on behalf of everyone stumbling upon this video.

    You manifested into this thread spouting unsubstantiated claims that raw milk is detrimental fluid for human consumption.

    You said, "Do your own research & you'll discover why milk is bad for you."

    Authentic research is. You are not. Everything you spew here has been derived from third party opinion & beLIEf. You prove ignorance, nothing more.

  • Your name is not befitting. i dont think you could discover your ass with both hands. You can't do ANY research on milk describing milks hazards? Sad.

    Here's one for you, how about lactose intolerance, thats one, chew on that for a while. by the way, its not just raw milk, its ANY milk

  • "Your name is not befitting."

    Dis-covering cancer fits my agenda well thank you :)

    Cancer is a beneficial process employed by the human organism in lieu of living agents such as bacteria, mold, parasites, fungi, etc. The body intermixes live, young mutated cells amidst accumulations of fibrous tissue. These cells contain potent dissolution compounds w/ capacity to dissolve & fractionate said fibrous tissue rapidly & efficiently. Such cells are coined "cancer" cells by modern medicine.

  • 1:49

    Look at his hands as he says "Reproduce"...he's holding his HUGE invisible boobies XD

  • Look! It's Luigi!!! :D

  • Got Milk...?

  • Arnold is a MASON,and he does what he is told to do.We are coming up to 2012,when they(JESUITS-CATHOLIC CHURCH),want to depopulate the planet.They are stopping people getting alternative natural treatment,because they want people ill,and using BIG PHARMA(they own them-FACT!!!).

    Next month,your economy crashes,to replace Dollar,with AMERO.

    The worlds governments are controlled by MASONS,who are obedient to the BLACK POPE!

    Martial-law is coming soon too.

    Youtube:FEMA concentration camps.

  • Wow O.o No wonder my asthma and allergies suck when I finally get to eat some Fruity pebbles = ( something I wish I knew 10 years or more ago

    Thank You Well Educated One!!!

  • Why do humans eat or drink anything then? If you can get it, and it's edible, you can eat it. We have to search for our foods, milk included. It's not like people grow up with fruit trees growing from our sides, but we eat fruit.

    And milk is yummy. I will always drink milk.

  • I don't drink milk at all.

    I drink a rice or almond beverage.

    Why are humans the only creatures

    that continue to drink milk after

    they have been weened from their

    mothers? All other animals stop

    consuming milk as a source of food

    after they are weened from their

    mothers.

    All milk is crap.

  • Well I drink Raw Milk. I say if the shoe fits wear it. : )

  • Humans are also the only creatures to make bread, the only creatures to cook complex meals, the only creatures to eat processed and packaged foods. what does humans being the only creatures to do it have to do with anything? In fact drinking milk, especially raw milk is more closely related to what other creatures do than probably any other foods/drinks we eat. According to you we should only eat fruits/vegetables and raw meat. and even those must be found by ourselves in the wild right?

  • Oh SNAP!

  • Milk is bad for you, raw or otherwise

  • Stonewalljackson7 - you are ignorant.

  • Bread is crap too.

  • RON PAUL 2008 for President

  • thats the only republican i like but dude its over for him.... OBAMA 08 for president..... join the dark side.

  • Obama is a CFR member whois for world goevrnance. Wake up man. If Ron loses, I won't vote. The other three are the same. Period. Do the research before voting.

  • i wish it were a constitutional right, but the founders didn't bother to protect rights they never dreamed any government would try to take away!

    Dan should try leading a drive to amend the California constitution, realize that Republicans now equal big government(when it comes to restricting private citizens), and support Ron Paul and other individual respecting lawmakers.

  • he's right raw milk is way to go. Theres way too many problems with the milk we drink today, infact it should be obvious because countries like India or Pakistan, well all Third-World Countries still drink raw milk notice the huge population = fat is rare. The only real problem in those countries is litter control and things of that matter, thats why ppl get sick there, the garbage goes into river streams and in the end causes contamination, but in the end the food they are eating is much better

  • this is about our right to decide what we eat by our choice.

    govt says guns, tobacco, and alcohol are legal.

    anyone wanna argue they are healthy????

    corporations are getting the final monopoly.

    we have to buy from them at their price.

    and arnold is not better than that. he signed the insane bill

    fight back before too late

  • RAW MILK is the shit, fight for it.

    Hope to get some in NYC one day.

  • Hurt him at the Box Office and the video sales/rental places. Stop going to see,

    renting or buying any of his movies.

    I'm 99% sure he gets a cut of the profits.

  • Yes! Check the Organic Pastures website to see the latest! Raw milk will not be banned!

  • Yeah! Until some unforeseen microbe makes someone sick as hell then you will all be crying foul and chanting SUE SUE SUE!

  • Dude, check your facts. Raw milk hasn't killed anyone. Pasteurized milk is linked to more deaths that anything. It's a de-vitalized food that has little to no nutritional value. If you are going to base your view on the position of the "States of the Union", that's up to you, but I think the point is, the rest of us shouldn't be forced to.

  • Don't talk to me as if you know more than I do about the dairy industry. My view is what I know and what I have seen. The process of pastuerization is too destroy the harmful bugs. The Red and White cow in my video was killed by listeria. Listeria has killed people. If raw milk is so safe then so is raw eggs and we all know that is capable of.

  • The funny thing is, the very milk you are defending (pasteurized) is the only milk that has ever been tainted with listeria. Raw milk dairies have much higher sanitation standards than conventional ones, which is why pasteurized milk is often still full of contaminants even after it's nuked (figuratively ofcourse). That red and white cow was likely so pumped full of hormones and anti-biotics that it's immune system didn't stand a chance. That's likely why it died of "listeria".

  • WRONG! It was as contaiminated as was Mark McAffes milk when those kids got sick. It makes no sense in either case and is also inconclusive. A lot of these bugs are in the enviornment. It could've easily been something off someones clothes.

  • The Red and White cow was pumped full of penicillin AFTER she was diagnosed by the veterinarian. If she were an organic cow then she would've suffered seriously because organic cows aren't allowed conventional bovine heatlh treatment. The reason why I won't consume organic milk.

  • Another reason I won't drink organic milk is because of the organic feedstuffs that are bought into the USA by other countries that have less than stellar records when it comes to safety and quality. I wonder how organic the soybeans coming from China really are?

  • Send gov. Alnold a letter or fax stating your disproval. Go to the Organic Pastures website for all the info on what and to who to write to.

  • Schwarzenegger will not get my vote if he doesn't allow the sale of raw milk in California!

  • I agree Dan! The signing of the (fraudulent) bill is shocking!

    Cheers to the People's God-given Rights to Real Nourishing Food!

    Chef Jem

    Executive Producer

    "The Raw Milk Controversy: Fact & Fiction - "

  • Alright! Great to see someone speaking up. Arnold is on my shit list till he reverses this law!

  • HORRAY FOR DAN HORRAH HORRAH ! fight for your right to have healthy food , instead of the processed crap the government was to shove ...quite literally ..down our throats.

  • Superb, Dan! Check out my video, Ron Paul: Health Freedom Rider about the raw milk debacle.

  • WOW!!! I had no idea raw milk was so bad for us. If it's being banned before alcohol and tobacco, then it must really be horrible... or am I missing something here. Dan, I think you might on to something.

    Is my unpasteurized, fresh squeezed orange juice next? Thanks Dan!

  • LOL that is sooo true , raw milk banned before tobacco and alcohol , when was the last time you heard that raw milk caused lung cancer or liver failure huh!

  • Great Video! I really hope that something can be done about this...my family only drinks raw milk and I couldn't believe it when the guy at Whole Foods told me they weren't going to sell it anymore!!! More people need to learn about the great benefits of raw milk and fight to get it back. Thanks for this video Dan!

  • Hooray for Dan Wells! I can't believe there's even a chance that I won't be able to choose what kind of milk I want to drink. I consume more than two gallons of raw milk every week. It's tragic how few people in CA understand the loss that we will face as a state if our right to choose raw milk is taken away. What's next...unfiltered wine? My sincere gratitude go out to Dan for taking the initiative to make this film and stand up for us all. Thanks Dan!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more