Not that I am defending Kinsey, because after finding out how "extensive" the child molester "research" was, if Green molested hundreds, not one or two out of the hundreds told their parents, or teacher, and reported it to the police, sex with children was against the law in the 40's and 50's. I mean bad parenting to top it off.
Although it is wrong and children were suffering, They have a valid point, If you can better understand it then you may have a better chance to treat it or avoid it.
So i can see it from Kinsey's point of view, Although i don't fully agree with his decisions not to report it.
this is plain sick how is child sexuality rrelevant to society and if kinsey wanted to really know about that he shud have researched children with other children not paedophile's version of rape n abuse. how is that even the same thing? n its not like society gained anything from knowing this anyway y wud this info b relevant yo grown men n women to know children r sexual beings??? what for
Even if it were relevant (and science is about knowing as much as possible), this doesn't dispense Kinsey from ethical boundaries - but since he aimed at removing exactly these, he sure had no problem with condoning such activities.
so Kinsey thought the "alleged" fact that an infant could have an orgasm was more important "scientifically" than the reality of rampant child abuse . What is the scientific benefit or value of this trivia anyway? Kinsey is guilty of self absorption into his own inclinations rather than working for the greater good as far as I can see.
but the real answer is due to the defence he is coming from.
the charge of saying that kinsey was the reason for the acceptability of peadophilia was rediculess to him therefore laughably.
the police knew Balliusek was a pedophile and they knew his connections with the murder victim. what this documentry fails to state is lack of evidence was not the reason he wasn't charged for murder.
All of these colleagues of his, who are defending this sicko, are close to the ages where they are going to have to answer for the course of their lives. They'll see how amusing it all was in the end.
Yeah that Hollywood movie has got ppl thinking he's the greatest thing and the end all be all. I just had this lesbian tell me that she thought that he changed the lesbian's lives for the better. Little does she know that all of his female sexuality research was based off of strippers and prostitutes, and then passed that off as normal sexual behaviors, ompletely unrepresentative of the average American female, lesbian or straight.
Comment removed
TheSjpatrik 1 day ago
They would defend the longitudinal study necrophiliac serial killers.
valis8536 1 month ago
@valis8536 In the academic setting in the USA, Kinsey is relied upon but with never a mention of his barbarity, . . .
phillipgaley 4 weeks ago
Not that I am defending Kinsey, because after finding out how "extensive" the child molester "research" was, if Green molested hundreds, not one or two out of the hundreds told their parents, or teacher, and reported it to the police, sex with children was against the law in the 40's and 50's. I mean bad parenting to top it off.
MichieHoward 4 months ago
@AlphaKillaX
I agree I think that whole institute just gets off on the material they can read and watch on film all supposedly in the name of science
FeignofCordor 10 months ago
Although it is wrong and children were suffering, They have a valid point, If you can better understand it then you may have a better chance to treat it or avoid it.
So i can see it from Kinsey's point of view, Although i don't fully agree with his decisions not to report it.
ItsMartynn 1 year ago
@ItsMartynn
There must be something wrong with you
FeignofCordor 10 months ago
I hope all pedos and Kinsey rot in hell!!!
peekaboo67 1 year ago 4
Kinsey was funded by the Rockefeller's.
rowsofvoices9 1 year ago 2
this is plain sick how is child sexuality rrelevant to society and if kinsey wanted to really know about that he shud have researched children with other children not paedophile's version of rape n abuse. how is that even the same thing? n its not like society gained anything from knowing this anyway y wud this info b relevant yo grown men n women to know children r sexual beings??? what for
asmaprincess 2 years ago 2
Even if it were relevant (and science is about knowing as much as possible), this doesn't dispense Kinsey from ethical boundaries - but since he aimed at removing exactly these, he sure had no problem with condoning such activities.
mainsqueeze1977 2 years ago
so Kinsey thought the "alleged" fact that an infant could have an orgasm was more important "scientifically" than the reality of rampant child abuse . What is the scientific benefit or value of this trivia anyway? Kinsey is guilty of self absorption into his own inclinations rather than working for the greater good as far as I can see.
burlearth 2 years ago 5
he's santa, he can't help it....
but the real answer is due to the defence he is coming from.
the charge of saying that kinsey was the reason for the acceptability of peadophilia was rediculess to him therefore laughably.
the police knew Balliusek was a pedophile and they knew his connections with the murder victim. what this documentry fails to state is lack of evidence was not the reason he wasn't charged for murder.
superchang847 2 years ago
That he was convicted anyway doesn't matter. Kinsey did protect a criminal which could have resulted in his not being convicted.
mainsqueeze1977 2 years ago
All of these colleagues of his, who are defending this sicko, are close to the ages where they are going to have to answer for the course of their lives. They'll see how amusing it all was in the end.
alexeykh 2 years ago
this doc is so biased against kinsey, i find it hard to watch
niamhc 2 years ago
Well of course - no one is going to portray him in a good light, because of current social attitudes towards the subject he researched.
nzmedic 2 years ago
Poor Kinsey. He got his big Hollywood production, let's get the real story. Let's get the kids some justice noww, too.
alexeykh 2 years ago
Yeah that Hollywood movie has got ppl thinking he's the greatest thing and the end all be all. I just had this lesbian tell me that she thought that he changed the lesbian's lives for the better. Little does she know that all of his female sexuality research was based off of strippers and prostitutes, and then passed that off as normal sexual behaviors, ompletely unrepresentative of the average American female, lesbian or straight.
funk7000 2 years ago 7
Are you serious with that comment dude? This is coming mostly from his direct colleages, which is practically straight from the horse's mouth
funk7000 2 years ago