You know those 2D physics sandboxes? Like phun and such. I just imagine how excited this man would get when he saw some of the things people do with those programs.
Just look up "Phun Gas Law" on youtube and imagine Feynman's reaction to it.
Such a wonderful man. He's pretty much convinced me to dedicate my life to studying physics (I was unsure of whether I should study neurology or physics)
I've watched this 20 times, a steel spring only works because its long, it is a rubber band, it only pulls back because it has necrosis of length. Necrosis is do to imobility, imotility, and tactility, just a mess. Then you give him 20-million dollars, wow, your so smart.
@ArchibaldCoke Yea! Take a loop and stretch one side and contract the other and make it run over two wheels (one driving and the other breaking)! And no freons leaked into the atmosphere! I wanna have one of those!
Think the Rubberbandits will find this a hot topic. :) The Unabomber was also interested in the physics of Rubber bands, after he heard a lecture by Prof. Zeeman.
the fact that selena gomezs' vlog got featured to this lifechangig video, and that it has 60x its' views annoys me and makes me sad at the same time... hope enlightment hits younger generations before it's too late.
Just look at how this man lights up when talking about something as seemingly mundane as rubber bands. Who else would be so excited about something so obscure?
When you have a deeper understanding of the world, everyday objects can be filled with wonder. We can marvel at the intricacies of a thing when other people see just a boring item. Science gives us a look into how things REALLY are.
1:44 oh my god...I used to do this all of the time and felt the same thing, but this bloke actually tried to account for it and did it perfectly. What a man.
It amazes me; the way this guy is able to simultaneously gush about how complex science is, while presenting it in such a way that it's comprehensible to the average, interested person.
hahah, holy shit, just recently at work i noticed all rubber bands snap after a few months or so if they're holding together a stack of paper, even if no one ever touches them.. and i wondered WHY the hell do they snap like that. well thanks to mr. Feynman here now i think i know why: the damn heat-creating bouncy atoms.
@mawd83 Please continue to study science in your spare time though! It's all just so WONDERFUL :) all you have to do is start right at the bottom and gently work your way up at your own pace. I did just that myself - my uni course is psychology, but after watching a video of ferrofluid and lamenting that, because of my academic choices, I would never understand the miraculous mechanisms by which such stuff behaved, I thought "To hell with that!" and went and bought a couple GCSE science books.
@mawd83 (continued) And I haven't stopped learning about science since. Am now on university-level biology and maths, and A-Level chemistry and physics - and am working at a highly reputable lab 6000 miles away from where I started. Please learn about science :) it's never too late to start - and there's so much joyous wonder to be discovered...
@mawd83 You can't help but become optimistic when you are listening to mr. Feynman so perhaps i sound somewhat childish, but is it really too late for you to become a scientist? Yes seven years is alot! perhaps you are too "old" ? you tell me, but then i suggest a science teacher be as inspirering as feynman, or perhaps even better. Is there anything more important than doing what makes you smile? But then again you can discard of all of this perhaps it is just a biproduct of feynmans enthusiasm
i wished he had mentioned that the energy those "giggling" molecules have come from the surrounding air. Their perpetual motion is fuled by the ambient heat. Thats why if you freeze a rubber band, it may break if you try to stetch it as if when it was not frozen.
yes the world is indeed "jiggling" so long as it has a temperature above absolute zero. in which case the only things "jiggling" are the electromagnetic waves of the universe.
Funny, I wonder what does the sun or the galaxy thinks?
"Planets and societies are a dynamic mess of jiggling humans. If you magnify it right, you can hardly see anything anymore because everyone is jiggling in their own patterns (human lives). Its lucky that we have such a large view of everything that we can see them as planets and societies without having to worry about the pathetic lives of those little people all the time."
@ enhanzable , sad how you call michio kaku a "retarted dumbfuck". to even use that term to describe someone who is so visionary and knowledgable really shows who the "retarted dumfuck" is. how many years of school does it take to become a "retarted dumbfuck"? as many as uve been in school?
What's wonderful about Feynman is that when he says something like "If you heat a rubber band, it'll pull more strongly" you know that he's *actually done the experiment at some point* no matter how simple it seems to be.
I think that's one reason he's was so able to put physics ideas in simple, everyday terms: because he always remembered the questions and observations that impelled him into physics in the first place, and he never lost his fascination with them.
It's tragic we don't have people like Feynman around anymore. The job of making physics interesting for the general population is left in the hands of retarded dumbfucks like Michio Kaku, who does nothing but getting cocaine-high on the publicity of lies, ridiculous exaggerations and incoherent, self-contradicting technological fantasies, to the point of delusions of grandeur. If only someone in the field would speak out about this, the coming generation takes him seriously because of his Ph.D.
@enHanzable Lot's do, even students of his. But he argues that String theory is the next paradigm shift in science and the viewing of our universe. I admit String field theory and his goal to have a Theory of Everything is pretty jarring, however he doesn't pull this stuff out of his ass and he even said that the Theory of Everything can also be a Theory of Nothing and we won't know until we solve the equation that even Einstein was trying to solve before he died.
@ravin. lol you should try talking to his students some time, they call him a self-centered, moody asshole wasting time forcing them to watch all his broadcasts/interviews and buy his books which are outside the curriculum. "even einstein"? you realize einstein wasted the latter HALF of his life fighting against science and progress (quantum mechanics)? by the time of his death, nobody took him seriously except the ignorant masses who bought into whatever the media wanted to present him as.
Were you a student of his? What science did you study or major? What are your views of the cosmos?
I personally have a problem whenever someone tries to predict what will happen in the future; too many variables involved to get it accurate. Red flags also come up when I hear him lecture about an inch-long Theory that would explain everything in the Universe and M-Universe.
In short I may not agree with Michio Kaku but I still respect him in the same way Sergei Eisenstein respected D.W. Griffith.
@ravin. kaku is so far removed from reality he only makes sense to that same crowd. they think not understanding him is part of what makes him so unbelievably awesome. they just assume that at least he himself is in total control of facts and the future of science, because he has the same haircut as einstein. he's a braindead poser who needs to be put out of his misery.
And in three years he demonstrated how super-cooling rubber takes all the stretch out of it: the chilled O-rings on the Space Shuttle had no elasticity left to contain the fuel and prevent an explosion.
And yet, String Theory is but one abstraction away from what he's saying. What is String Theory, really but "a dynamic mess of jiggling things", (a muti-dimensional mess at that), that twist and turn and vibrate to form the fundamental particles and indeed, the world? :)
No, you are missing the point. Neither is an abstraction, but an explanation of what is really going on. The "dynamic mess of jiggling things" he talks about has absolutely nothing in common with any aspect of string theory, which is actually two or three layers in magnitude smaller than normal atoms.
Sigh. Let me explain myself here. He is certainly not talking about String Theory. I merely pointed out that the idea of the world being a "dynamic mess of jiggling things" could have well been one of those that *led* to String Theory being formulated since it is, in essence vibrating strings combining to form the particles.
So yes, he is not directly or indirectly talking about String theory. The statement I made was in hindsight and describes a simplistic String Theory rather well. Allegory.
This reminds me of the Challenger disaster and the rubber 'o' ring. If he'd had said more directly what happens to a rubber band at freezing temperatures it would have been kind of freaky... maybe...
Bei tempi quando le ragazze si innamoravano dei calciatori e dei tronisti. Adesso si innamorano di premi nobel per la fisica (oltretutto un pò morti). Chissà dove andremo a finire...
LOL. e chi non si innamora di Feynman. Ma hai ragione.. O meglio, Ha ragione: quando avevo 11 anni mi sono innamorata di Albert Einstein.
Gli uomini si innamorano spesso di donne bellissime e scheme. Che male c'e'. Io ho un debbole per un intelligenza folle. E' morto, d'accordo, ma se mi innamorassi di, mettiamo, Johnny Depp, non sarebbe piu disponibile per me. Tante belle cose e si vedra' dove si va a finire!(non sono tipica).
0:16 I love the twinkle in his eye. He just can't contain his amusement with elastic polymer behavior in rubber bands.
HelterMcSkelter 4 days ago
You know those 2D physics sandboxes? Like phun and such. I just imagine how excited this man would get when he saw some of the things people do with those programs.
Just look up "Phun Gas Law" on youtube and imagine Feynman's reaction to it.
Such a wonderful man. He's pretty much convinced me to dedicate my life to studying physics (I was unsure of whether I should study neurology or physics)
w00td00t 4 days ago
0:28 You heard it here folks. Chains are kinky. =D
KaslarProductions 2 weeks ago
i learned about this on the slingshot channel. Amazing when you think about it!
pyrea17 2 weeks ago
I've watched this 20 times, a steel spring only works because its long, it is a rubber band, it only pulls back because it has necrosis of length. Necrosis is do to imobility, imotility, and tactility, just a mess. Then you give him 20-million dollars, wow, your so smart.
ftlqed 3 weeks ago
very interesting video thanks
TheKcsmithy 1 month ago
brilliant video
jjclassjj 1 month ago
interesting video and very informative
MrBrucebracey 1 month ago
This cooling effect gives me an idea for a rubber band based refrigerator.
ArchibaldCoke 1 month ago
@ArchibaldCoke Yea! Take a loop and stretch one side and contract the other and make it run over two wheels (one driving and the other breaking)! And no freons leaked into the atmosphere! I wanna have one of those!
episcophagus 1 month ago
@episcophagus breaking - brakeing! Of course!
episcophagus 1 month ago
Think the Rubberbandits will find this a hot topic. :) The Unabomber was also interested in the physics of Rubber bands, after he heard a lecture by Prof. Zeeman.
Willipearse 2 months ago
the fact that selena gomezs' vlog got featured to this lifechangig video, and that it has 60x its' views annoys me and makes me sad at the same time... hope enlightment hits younger generations before it's too late.
montrey666666 4 months ago
I've found out this effect with an airballoon when I was i kid! Now, 20 years later, I have a precise explanation of why it became cooler/hotter...
ThaFacka 4 months ago 2
Albert Einstein said:
If you can not explain it simply enough, you dont understand it well enough"
It's not hard to tell that Feynman understand the world well enough!
Thumbs up if you agree :-)
Nossucram 4 months ago
2:20 - made me another person
kristofarkas 5 months ago
Comment removed
kristofarkas 5 months ago
This should bee the 101 of teaching teaching.
AndreBlackScribe 5 months ago in playlist Richard Feynman - "Fun to Imagine"
Just look at how this man lights up when talking about something as seemingly mundane as rubber bands. Who else would be so excited about something so obscure?
When you have a deeper understanding of the world, everyday objects can be filled with wonder. We can marvel at the intricacies of a thing when other people see just a boring item. Science gives us a look into how things REALLY are.
2eelShmeal 5 months ago 6
1:44 oh my god...I used to do this all of the time and felt the same thing, but this bloke actually tried to account for it and did it perfectly. What a man.
ken6346 5 months ago in playlist Richard Feynman: Fun to Imagine (BBC Series, 1983)
This has been flagged as spam show
I sat in a chair exactly like this recently. It shocked me when I found that I could not attain Feynman's level of enthusiasm and joy for physics!
EquinoxParadox91 6 months ago
LOL. I thought I was the only one who took rubber bands and stretched them by my lips. :D
brucecrossan1 6 months ago
Never knew about this man until today. This guy was awesome.
zkennedy80 7 months ago in playlist Richard Feynman - "Fun to Imagine" 3
It amazes me; the way this guy is able to simultaneously gush about how complex science is, while presenting it in such a way that it's comprehensible to the average, interested person.
The man was truly a gift to his species.
hectified 7 months ago 7
hahah, holy shit, just recently at work i noticed all rubber bands snap after a few months or so if they're holding together a stack of paper, even if no one ever touches them.. and i wondered WHY the hell do they snap like that. well thanks to mr. Feynman here now i think i know why: the damn heat-creating bouncy atoms.
xjaskix 9 months ago 2
I noticed this as a child, and never thought anything of it!
matsis01 11 months ago
Do rubber bands work in a perfect vacuum?
TheGuyWhoToldMeToTel 1 year ago
@TheGuyWhoToldMeToTel - dQ/dt = k delT
Rogueek 11 months ago
@Rogueek Word.
TheGuyWhoToldMeToTel 11 months ago
Comment removed
j0s386 9 months ago
Comment removed
j0s386 9 months ago
@TheGuyWhoToldMeToTel of course.they should go on "indefinitely" provided you could just stretch them & then somehow "throw" them in "empty space"
prasoonpandey2000 7 months ago
I wish he was my science teacher in high school. I would have become a scientist instead of working in construction.
mawd83 1 year ago 36
@mawd83 Please continue to study science in your spare time though! It's all just so WONDERFUL :) all you have to do is start right at the bottom and gently work your way up at your own pace. I did just that myself - my uni course is psychology, but after watching a video of ferrofluid and lamenting that, because of my academic choices, I would never understand the miraculous mechanisms by which such stuff behaved, I thought "To hell with that!" and went and bought a couple GCSE science books.
hmspinaforethisisspa 2 weeks ago
@mawd83 (continued) And I haven't stopped learning about science since. Am now on university-level biology and maths, and A-Level chemistry and physics - and am working at a highly reputable lab 6000 miles away from where I started. Please learn about science :) it's never too late to start - and there's so much joyous wonder to be discovered...
hmspinaforethisisspa 2 weeks ago
@mawd83 You can't help but become optimistic when you are listening to mr. Feynman so perhaps i sound somewhat childish, but is it really too late for you to become a scientist? Yes seven years is alot! perhaps you are too "old" ? you tell me, but then i suggest a science teacher be as inspirering as feynman, or perhaps even better. Is there anything more important than doing what makes you smile? But then again you can discard of all of this perhaps it is just a biproduct of feynmans enthusiasm
Dimajo 2 weeks ago
could i heat a metal pipe by raping it in stretched rubber bands?
If I have a sealed box with walls made of stretched rubber bands will the area inside be hotter, cooler or neither?
crappymeal 1 year ago
I saw rubber bands and thought how is Richard "Mcgyver" Feynman going to explain his way through this one.
skydome29 1 year ago
I did the thing with the rubber bands on my lip, and it works!
nhmllr725 1 year ago
i wished he had mentioned that the energy those "giggling" molecules have come from the surrounding air. Their perpetual motion is fuled by the ambient heat. Thats why if you freeze a rubber band, it may break if you try to stetch it as if when it was not frozen.
zer0dahero 1 year ago
@zer0dahero I guess you already know though.
Master8laster 1 year ago
yes the world is indeed "jiggling" so long as it has a temperature above absolute zero. in which case the only things "jiggling" are the electromagnetic waves of the universe.
gatoradeee 1 year ago
@gatoradeee what about zero-point energy from an electron?
Vennificus 1 year ago
Who is the other guy who didn't like this video!? I mean - the first's got to be Adolf, but who the hell pressed that button the second time? Weird.
DogBoots77 1 year ago
@DogBoots77 Well... if the first one was Adolf, the second one has to be Hirohito. :D
majst0r 1 year ago
Who else would find rubber bands so fascinating? I love this guy, not everyday you can see a man with such passion.
inphrased 1 year ago
This video makes me sad i don't have a rubber band on hand. I want to try this out.
fyeJack 1 year ago 4
Funny, I wonder what does the sun or the galaxy thinks?
"Planets and societies are a dynamic mess of jiggling humans. If you magnify it right, you can hardly see anything anymore because everyone is jiggling in their own patterns (human lives). Its lucky that we have such a large view of everything that we can see them as planets and societies without having to worry about the pathetic lives of those little people all the time."
projectcedric 1 year ago 2
Richard Feynman, a man who thinks rubber bands are fascinating, I love it!!!
Arcrer 1 year ago
Why is selena gomez a features video here?
devotedpupa 1 year ago 13
@devotedpupa
Probably because of the tag "jiggling."
seemyjohn 1 year ago 6
SO. AWESOME.
Ccolebrooked 1 year ago
Feynman's got such great enthusiasm and explains it so well!! Our universe is one strange mess of jiggly atoms.
spartacandream 1 year ago
You're a fine man, Richard.
That's right. I said it.
Koujinkamu 1 year ago 2
ChristopherJSykes Rocks !!!
WoodstockHippie1969 1 year ago
"The world is a dynamic mess of jiggling things if you look at it right"....this man is brilliant !
SporeZoo 1 year ago 5
my balls are jiggling too
pdpbigbang 1 year ago
Thank you for sharing this. What an amazing individual with an incredible ability to explain. What a shame he has passed on.
jmaytum 2 years ago
@ enhanzable , sad how you call michio kaku a "retarted dumbfuck". to even use that term to describe someone who is so visionary and knowledgable really shows who the "retarted dumfuck" is. how many years of school does it take to become a "retarted dumbfuck"? as many as uve been in school?
anjundoobies89 2 years ago
What's wonderful about Feynman is that when he says something like "If you heat a rubber band, it'll pull more strongly" you know that he's *actually done the experiment at some point* no matter how simple it seems to be.
I think that's one reason he's was so able to put physics ideas in simple, everyday terms: because he always remembered the questions and observations that impelled him into physics in the first place, and he never lost his fascination with them.
lytrigian 2 years ago 7
It's tragic we don't have people like Feynman around anymore. The job of making physics interesting for the general population is left in the hands of retarded dumbfucks like Michio Kaku, who does nothing but getting cocaine-high on the publicity of lies, ridiculous exaggerations and incoherent, self-contradicting technological fantasies, to the point of delusions of grandeur. If only someone in the field would speak out about this, the coming generation takes him seriously because of his Ph.D.
enHanzable 2 years ago 6
@enHanzable Lot's do, even students of his. But he argues that String theory is the next paradigm shift in science and the viewing of our universe. I admit String field theory and his goal to have a Theory of Everything is pretty jarring, however he doesn't pull this stuff out of his ass and he even said that the Theory of Everything can also be a Theory of Nothing and we won't know until we solve the equation that even Einstein was trying to solve before he died.
ravinprophin 2 years ago
@ravin. lol you should try talking to his students some time, they call him a self-centered, moody asshole wasting time forcing them to watch all his broadcasts/interviews and buy his books which are outside the curriculum. "even einstein"? you realize einstein wasted the latter HALF of his life fighting against science and progress (quantum mechanics)? by the time of his death, nobody took him seriously except the ignorant masses who bought into whatever the media wanted to present him as.
enHanzable 2 years ago
Were you a student of his? What science did you study or major? What are your views of the cosmos?
I personally have a problem whenever someone tries to predict what will happen in the future; too many variables involved to get it accurate. Red flags also come up when I hear him lecture about an inch-long Theory that would explain everything in the Universe and M-Universe.
In short I may not agree with Michio Kaku but I still respect him in the same way Sergei Eisenstein respected D.W. Griffith.
ravinprophin 2 years ago
@ravin. kaku is so far removed from reality he only makes sense to that same crowd. they think not understanding him is part of what makes him so unbelievably awesome. they just assume that at least he himself is in total control of facts and the future of science, because he has the same haircut as einstein. he's a braindead poser who needs to be put out of his misery.
enHanzable 2 years ago
@enHanzable Couldn't agree more. Kaku's a feckin' nobhead. Anyone see him in that The Secret video?
Paullove89 1 year ago
well put enhanzable
NoSz4 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NERD!
compassionkicksass 2 years ago
TROLL
biorobotmachine 2 years ago
Was this interview done before or after the Challenger inquiry?
Aletheophile 2 years ago
Oh, just saw the date in the description, never mind.
Aletheophile 2 years ago
hhahahahhaha. I love at 1:09 you hear one of their small intestine grumble. hahahhaha
brenthoser99 2 years ago 7
Hahaha! Well spotted!
CornCob6000 2 years ago
And in three years he demonstrated how super-cooling rubber takes all the stretch out of it: the chilled O-rings on the Space Shuttle had no elasticity left to contain the fuel and prevent an explosion.
yorktown99 2 years ago 4
Feinman is the man! Who ever thought rubber bands were so interesting?
bloggycreek 2 years ago 22
I've done this rubberband thing on the lips without ever knowing the chemisty/physics that goes into it. Wow! i love this man!!
rjq731 2 years ago 6
This man is a badass. Too bad most of us didn't have a chance to have a little chat with him.
HumanStrategy 2 years ago 14
"the world is a dynamic mess of jiggling things" :-)
slackologist 2 years ago 196
This comment has received too many negative votes show
String theory, in a nutshell.
darthzydar 2 years ago
No, he's not talking about string theory, which attempts to describe the structure on tiny quarks and bosons, but of individual atoms and molecules.
yorktown99 2 years ago
And yet, String Theory is but one abstraction away from what he's saying. What is String Theory, really but "a dynamic mess of jiggling things", (a muti-dimensional mess at that), that twist and turn and vibrate to form the fundamental particles and indeed, the world? :)
darthzydar 2 years ago
Don't make statements you clearly haven't researched, people might believe you.
Craggles17 2 years ago
Yes, that pretty much sums it up, my friend! :)
mrpossibilities 2 years ago
No, you are missing the point. Neither is an abstraction, but an explanation of what is really going on. The "dynamic mess of jiggling things" he talks about has absolutely nothing in common with any aspect of string theory, which is actually two or three layers in magnitude smaller than normal atoms.
yorktown99 2 years ago
Sigh. Let me explain myself here. He is certainly not talking about String Theory. I merely pointed out that the idea of the world being a "dynamic mess of jiggling things" could have well been one of those that *led* to String Theory being formulated since it is, in essence vibrating strings combining to form the particles.
So yes, he is not directly or indirectly talking about String theory. The statement I made was in hindsight and describes a simplistic String Theory rather well. Allegory.
darthzydar 2 years ago
strings are a billion times smaller than atoms!
dan314159 2 years ago
@slackologist Amazing thought =)
spartacandream 1 year ago
what he says in the end... i think about things as little atoms a lot.
pollocybertronx 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Me too. Consider the Buddhist notion of "emptiness".
thecamlayton 2 years ago
"The world is a dynamic mess of jiggling things, if you look at it right"
Oh Mr. Feynman, I love you man.
mrqwantz 2 years ago 138
@mrqwantz Dr. Feynman
LeoLeoni13 1 year ago
This reminds me of the Challenger disaster and the rubber 'o' ring. If he'd had said more directly what happens to a rubber band at freezing temperatures it would have been kind of freaky... maybe...
stevelee777 2 years ago 5
Thank you very much for uploading, this is awesome.
DonQuichotteLiberia 2 years ago 3
Wow, I found a piece of rubber band and tried it immediately, it is true, and I never knew this, fascinating.
Feynman is such a great scientist, great teacher and great mind.
navghtivs 2 years ago 4
Brilliant!
t0kt0k 2 years ago 7
Dr. Feynman... please!!! What's this kinky stuff about rubber bands?
Oh, I love you, I always have.
Thank you for every word and the amount of pleasure you have brought me. "It's lucky we have such a large-scale view of everything."
francescaemc2 3 years ago 10
Bei tempi quando le ragazze si innamoravano dei calciatori e dei tronisti. Adesso si innamorano di premi nobel per la fisica (oltretutto un pò morti). Chissà dove andremo a finire...
Faraday128 3 years ago
LOL. e chi non si innamora di Feynman. Ma hai ragione.. O meglio, Ha ragione: quando avevo 11 anni mi sono innamorata di Albert Einstein.
Gli uomini si innamorano spesso di donne bellissime e scheme. Che male c'e'. Io ho un debbole per un intelligenza folle. E' morto, d'accordo, ma se mi innamorassi di, mettiamo, Johnny Depp, non sarebbe piu disponibile per me. Tante belle cose e si vedra' dove si va a finire!(non sono tipica).
ciao, francesca
francescaemc2 3 years ago