I have owned both of these cars and the Z hands down is a much better car. It rides more like a race car drives more like a race car and has gobs more power and torque. The Honda is better on an autocross track but it seems so cheap though. That fat z ass doesn't doesnt come around without sliding it. There just ain't enough room in those courses for a powersliding car.
@Knight353- get rid of the 4 feet worth of low end robbing cats and that 350 becomes a new animal entirely.
@krazzyyo2 lol u can be all talk..but lets settle this on the black top..lets see whose a fag and a idiot...u can talk shit all u want on the internet
i have a 350 and they honestly dont have much power in 1st and 2nd..but in 3rd and 4th they haul ass..ive never driven a s2k but i would bet the 350z comes with a lot more torque and the top end of those things is sickk
Everyone has their preferences, which is fair and understood; but many of you need to stop posting nonsense and learn to present your arguments maturely! No one purchases sports cars because of their resale value, not to mention that the Honda brand clearly has a better resale value than Nissan. And yes, these cars were in roughly the same price bracket, so they fall in the same category. However, they are obviously two very different cars, and thus, people love them for very different reasons.
I've owned both cars before but it'd say the Z would win if the driver is better, I seen Z's consistantly run 13.5-14.5 in GA, I usually see s2000's run 14.2-15.5's. Especially with the New HR the 350z Has the s2000 would not keep up. People keep saying turbo the s2000, but if you think about it both these cars are about the same price off the lot so they're in the same class, turboing the s2000 would be unfair just because s2000 owners think it's unfair, they're in the same class
Horsepower to weight ratio!!! Mother f u c k e r s shut the hell up about saying " I want to see a turbo s2000 go against a z" shut up, seriously? Then reduce the weight of the 350z to match the weight of s2000, really stop sounding like ignorant idiots
you guys are talking about stock vs stock, why not take it too the track and dont give your shit "saying you need to re-educate yourself on your statistics" because if anything you need too!
Honestly stock for stock a de and s2k will be a good run. That 350z has full bolt ons don't forget. The N1 exhaust is the old mod on the s2k . And that exhaust is 60 mm lol.
Hondas are for kids? Guess I'm a kid then. Of course a 300hp v6 is going to win against a 4 cyl, but I'd like to see a 350z take on a stage 1 turbo s2k... That'd be nice
i dont hink stock Zs churp 3rd gear....just saying....cause my buddy has one and i believe 2nd cause my S2000 does it too...but 3rd? lol....i dont own a Z so i really dont know
i have a z you fucking idiot he just has mufflers on it u can see if you look closely b/c mine sounds like that b/c i took mine off completely so stfu. i understand honda's are for kids ok but try not to act like it when you never have a chance against a nissan
@dk8730 all depends on the driver unless u put a heavily modified car up against a stock car, than yea we know who will win the race ... generally, the same skilled driver in a honda s2k and a nissan 350z stock for stock, the Z should take each time theoretically, but all depends on the situation and driver of course
all nice cars. I still went with s2k despite the slightly more power the z has (depends on model). Why? because the s2000 is a true sports car, when you drive it, it feels as such. When you drive a 350z the power is nice but it feels like a maxima sedan minus 2 seats (which is quite accurate based on the chassis alone.) Still both great cars that can put smiles on the owners faces.
although s2k is light..it lacks the displacement the 350z has...the z has more power and more torque..check the stats out but both are great cars tho!
stock for stock the s2k lacks the power to keep up with the Z, if you think the s2k can run with a z (stock for stock) then you need to re-educated yourself on your statistics
Hay nut sack! the s2k is a sports car, who gives a fuck about straight line performance. put both cars on a track. stock with the same driver tell me what car is faster.
Maybe.. but if you think a stock 350z can pull a .93 G Skid or out handle a stock S2K on an actual roadcourse YOU my friend need to re-educate yourself. These are 2 different animals. The Z weighs about 500-600 pounds more and has much more torque, about 100 more.
I have an SRT4 that will demolish any Z or S2000 that's not running a high powered turbo set up, but something about the S2K's stability and handling is something else. I bought a 2001 AP1 With only 1400 miles. I know going in a Z will smoke me light to light.. but i live near the mountains and would happily challenge a Z there.
LMAO. Wanna race my SRT4 running 20 PSI??? Not to mention your STI would get crushed by a stock S2K anyways if you removed the turbo. I'm not sure where you're going with this. Maybe you're jealous because your car is terrible. Anyone that gets an STI should of gotten an Evo. Your car can never get over 400 HP on a stock block. Plus it handles like shit for being AWD.
No... the AP1 weighs 2750-2800. The AP2 gained over 100 pounds. So we are still talking a 500 pound difference. Regardless a stock Z handles worse ; x. I've been cruising to auto cross. I've seen it with my own eyes. S2K's>350Z including HR at auto cross.
hmm okay well the AP2 is around 2865 some pounds which comes down to around 400 pounds not 600 pounds. regardless man you can say it handles better that's upto you dude, of course a car with no power would handle better lol look at the rx-8 theres no fucking power to handle? lmao seriously.
Car with no power? Ever hear of power to weight? A Lotus has less than 200 HP but will leave your Z about 10 cars behind. The S2K produces more power per liter than any piston engine car on the planet. We have talked on other videos and i love the Z, but i don't like when you make it sound like the Z is a supercar. Like everything else it's flawed. It has nothing to do with power on the track, it comes down to the S2K having a superior chassis.
The Z is a quicker car, i never claimed it wasn't. If you want the better handling track car in stock form though, S2K all day. Many tests and races have proven my theory.
i already raced a lotus and beat him by half a car the Lotus just like the HR runs low 13s but has low trap speeds. you guys with your shyt don't even get the facts straight yeah the lotus is fast but its DEFINATELY not what u said because if it was he would have pulled on me. Power to weight ratio thats why rx8 weighs close to 3100 pounds thats 200 pounds less than the 350z, if the rx8 was 2500 pounds I COULD UNDERSTAND your power to weight ratio but the rx8 fukin weighs 3053-3100 pounds!
On every video you beat everyones car. I bet you beat Ferrari's all the time man. Nobody was insulting the Z. I said stock for stock the S2K handles better but is a little slower, calm down. I've seen a Lotus Elise race an HR Z on the freeway and smoke one, trust me they track time may be similar but not in a real world situation. They test in perfect weather, perfect sea level and perfect tarmac.
Plus i never specified which Lotus! ;p. I could of been talking about the Lotus Espirit V8 turbo from 98 that runs mid 12s-high 12s. You'de probably beat that too though huh?
oh the lotus espirit v8 turbo would rape me its just like a lexus IS F and i don't even want to get started when i raced my friend IS F hes actually on youtube him username is cayman driver he raped me by 3.5 + car lengths. the facts are facts man i thought you were talking about the elise which is pretty much a car even with the hr 350z, the espirit yeah no doubt, dude im not a fan boy bro, you might think im a youtube racer but man i do this shyt every day with every legit car, thats my life.
dude i don't beat ferraris and i am by far a fan boy, youre just boosting up the lotus like its some street racing monster when it isnt man. YES THE LOTUS IS fast but ure comment of oh it would leave car lengths on u gimmy a break guy, I RACE i fukin RACE thats what I DO i don't sit behind youtube talkin all this crap i dont care if a lotus pulled on a hr 350z i dont know anything abt the driving skills of that guy dude i pull 6 car lengths on a fukin s2k u call that a bluff go look at the vid.
"The S2K produces more power per liter than any piston engine car on the planet"
A true test to hond's engineering. Thier engines are amazing. The K series has really succeeded the b series. actually the Ferrari 458 has the highest hp per liter NA.
The s200 has a higher HP per liter than the viper by far, but the viper is still a much faster car. hp/l doesnt mean shit when there are 500hp+ cars wil less hp per liter. stupid stat.
Power has NOTHING to do with handling you ricer. I guess an ferrari Enzo can't handle because it has 650hp. The reason why they handle so well is because the RX8 weighs 3050lbs, and the S2000 weighs 2850lbs. It's weight not power. Now to save weight most use small engines, which subesequently does lower power output but power doesn't have any effect on handling.
@koukicrisp wellllll.... How much power are you talking here? Do enough mods to get enough power out of something and it is going to be harder to handle.....
Power does have to do with cornering. If you have too much, the car will spin the tires, and spinning the tires will definitely affect how the car is turning. Also with AWD cars, the amount of power being put out into the road will determine how much understeer it gets.
@xtelevisionset not necessarily, maybe your need for better handling increases but handling itself will not change. Given that the S2k pulls .95G if you add 100hp it'll still pull .95G. If it does 60-0 in 115ft. regardless of extra HP it'll still do the same numbers, the only thing that changes is the need for handling, maybe at 400hp in a S2k .95G is not adequate, maybe youll need some fatter tires, but the numbers and handling characteristics does not change.
@koukicrisp you're correct for the most part. but you ever watch a 67 shelby cobra replica try to autocross? they handle for shit because they have too much power to weight. you barely tap the gas coming out of a turn an they lose it almost everytime. yes i understand that has a lot to do with the driver knowing the car. but its seriously unbelievably difficult to control. the thing about the s2000 and rx8 is they have very little torque, which makes for easier to control.
@Vgoalie you really need to educate yourself more if your going to argue that the s2k cant run with a Z based on "STATISTICS".
please visit the site:wwwzeroto60timescom/ where you will see that both cars according to their respective years are about the same as they both hit 14.1 in the quarter mile. thank you... pwned
bull, an early 350z 03, 04 will not take an s2000 trust me we ve done those races many times ...a370z is another story though. an 03, 04 350z is a 14.2 or 14.3 car while any year s2000 can go 14.0 even 13.9
Sure...you're the expert here, right? Too bad motortrend got a 13.7 out of their 2003 track model 5 years ago, and many people on the Z forums have hit 13.6 since then.
its funny how people buy these expensive "fast" cars when you can take a honda and put at most 3k into in a own everyone on the streets. thats why everyone hates them. silmpy jelous cause it take little money to make a fast car. keep it up
the s2000 is the only honda besides nsx Id get its not about putting less money into the car than other cars to make it quicker that I hate or am jealous of it's the fact that all hondas except for ones mentioned are fwd thts a deal breaker right there and they feel very cheap inside
Whoa bro, don't xclude the SI just cuz it's fwd. I have the new si and it's a great car, yea it is a bummer bn fwd when it would b rwd lyk the s2000. But if u haven't u shud try out the new si's they're nice and the reall beast is the honda RR mugen which is a sexy beast lol though still fwd ; (
Wow bro that was really uncalled for but newayz the si meugen rr has a stronger engine then the standard si while still n/a putting out 240hp. The si is a nice car for it's price, speed, 4banger n/a engine, and features. If you don't like the si that's cool not everyone is but I do like my car and the si's i do wish they kept them rwd lyk they use to be and in fact they had higher torque in the older modles and hp too.
U camirocz is a stupid moron, STFU! early model Zs 03/04 are the fastest Zs next to the HR due to their lighter weight. Stop talking out your ass, any year Z is faster than any year S2k stock vs stock in a straight line.
dont be mad Zs are faster than S2k Stock vs Stock lol. U sound like a lil kid, do u even have a car??? Fastest stock DE Z ran 13.6, fastest stock HR Z ran 13.1
yea its true Z's are faster stock vs stock on the straight, but the S2000's a cornering machine take this to the winding roads and its a different story.
@onungamon22 Your wrong the fastest DE was a 04 with just full bolt ons and drag tires ran low 13's. Its possible. Time slips can be seen on my350z.com
@specvtypepnoy dude wtf you serious? Did i not say Stock!?!?! thats modded bro. I said a stock DE will run 13.6 and it will not run 13.1 like you said. Again stock STOCK stock STOCK! wtf you smoking?
While you are right that a Z will take the Honda on a track, it's mostly due to the better acceleration that makes up for the slightly worse handling. I don't think anyone can really argue that the Honda doesn't handle better, because it does.
have you ever seen a white s2k lowered with bronze advan rims.... ?? prob the most gorgeous thing ever. I would have bought one over my Z if I wasn't such a torque-aholic. Both great cars, preference is all it comes down to.
they said a 150 lbs passenger... thats about what i weigh right now... i need to go back to 105 lbs... weight matters... especialy on hondas w/ no torque...
I have owned both of these cars and the Z hands down is a much better car. It rides more like a race car drives more like a race car and has gobs more power and torque. The Honda is better on an autocross track but it seems so cheap though. That fat z ass doesn't doesnt come around without sliding it. There just ain't enough room in those courses for a powersliding car.
@Knight353- get rid of the 4 feet worth of low end robbing cats and that 350 becomes a new animal entirely.
wintergreen1988 1 month ago
Another "I was running low boost" video brought to you by Alberto
TinnInches 1 month ago
Hah! I offend you all! I own a Z4! :P
Brandencarroll1 1 month ago
it's... so... pixelated... i think mario and luigi as driving to save peach from bowser... ;P
vann247 5 months ago
s2k all the way!! s2k was stock..fo sho..z had mods
jmun28x 5 months ago
@jmun28x haha..shut up fag..you idiot.
krazzyyo2 4 months ago
@krazzyyo2 lol u can be all talk..but lets settle this on the black top..lets see whose a fag and a idiot...u can talk shit all u want on the internet
jmun28x 4 months ago
@jmun28x I say your the fag for quoting The Fast and the Furious in an internet car argument :)
V35Skyline350GT 3 months ago
@V35Skyline350GT and i say ur the fag cuz u had no business in this
jmun28x 3 months ago
i have a 350 and they honestly dont have much power in 1st and 2nd..but in 3rd and 4th they haul ass..ive never driven a s2k but i would bet the 350z comes with a lot more torque and the top end of those things is sickk
Knight353 5 months ago
albertos stock 350z. so cute lol.
mrkingquang 6 months ago
I dont care which one is faster i rather have a Z than a s2000 anyday.
fourlokoJoker 6 months ago 6
Fucking hate S2000's..they're wack! HAIL TO THE Z
aaf1218 6 months ago
Everyone has their preferences, which is fair and understood; but many of you need to stop posting nonsense and learn to present your arguments maturely! No one purchases sports cars because of their resale value, not to mention that the Honda brand clearly has a better resale value than Nissan. And yes, these cars were in roughly the same price bracket, so they fall in the same category. However, they are obviously two very different cars, and thus, people love them for very different reasons.
djclel 6 months ago
Horsepower doesn't mean shit if your torque sucks ass. I don't like to be pinging red lines just to keep up.
Model192 7 months ago 2
I've owned both cars before but it'd say the Z would win if the driver is better, I seen Z's consistantly run 13.5-14.5 in GA, I usually see s2000's run 14.2-15.5's. Especially with the New HR the 350z Has the s2000 would not keep up. People keep saying turbo the s2000, but if you think about it both these cars are about the same price off the lot so they're in the same class, turboing the s2000 would be unfair just because s2000 owners think it's unfair, they're in the same class
shinsengumiiii 7 months ago
Both cars are a blast to drive!
burr117 7 months ago
Doesn't look like the S was trying the second run. Silly rabbit, tricks are for kids!! :P
onefionechico 7 months ago
nice kill
The44445544 8 months ago
ehh I think the s2k did fine the first run. kept up fairly well. 2.2 liter vs a 3.0 liter?? hands down to the honda.
auomauom 8 months ago
@auomauom 3.5 litter, i'll rather have the Z any day, i bet the resale value of any nissan is better than that of honda.
rolando1200 6 months ago
waxed
jayfiver 8 months ago
s2k's r the slowest car(stock) in its price range. they scream "MOD ME" as soon as you pull it off the lot.
UPcomingBARBER08 8 months ago
u guys r all failing to troll each other which is the sad part. who cares who's faster even though the Z def is. LOL
dirtyhousetuneZ 9 months ago
heh why i got out of the import market. i do miss my 370z it atleast could break 12's with boltons.
onebadg8 9 months ago
/watch?v=zKNdECv2Zs0&feature=email&email=comment_received
dicktp 10 months ago
Horsepower to weight ratio!!! Mother f u c k e r s shut the hell up about saying " I want to see a turbo s2000 go against a z" shut up, seriously? Then reduce the weight of the 350z to match the weight of s2000, really stop sounding like ignorant idiots
musicclever 1 year ago
What year are they
SRmotorsports101 1 year ago
you guys are talking about stock vs stock, why not take it too the track and dont give your shit "saying you need to re-educate yourself on your statistics" because if anything you need too!
dammyousuck 1 year ago
Put them on a track n lets see who beats who....
OtakuJdm 1 year ago
@OtakuJdm
S2K would lose. Especially now.
JS04 1 year ago
@JS04 I still doubt it but, everyone is entitled to their opinion. Of course SK2 would need to do some serious power additions.
OtakuJdm 1 year ago
@OtakuJdm
You should look up the rest of Albertos vids and see what he upgraded. Like I said, S2K would lose.
JS04 10 months ago
Z FUCKED U UP!
tastings4life 1 year ago
Honestly stock for stock a de and s2k will be a good run. That 350z has full bolt ons don't forget. The N1 exhaust is the old mod on the s2k . And that exhaust is 60 mm lol.
IAmTheRealAsif 1 year ago
guy in the Z knows how to shift
Bimbodeoro 1 year ago
Hondas are for kids? Guess I'm a kid then. Of course a 300hp v6 is going to win against a 4 cyl, but I'd like to see a 350z take on a stage 1 turbo s2k... That'd be nice
DivinityOfDoom 1 year ago
@DivinityOfDoom I'd like to see a stage 1 turbo s2k take on a stage 1 turbo 350z... That's also be nice
JGoodwin1016 1 year ago
im getting my first car and am a huge car fanatic.. have been intrested in cars since i was 5. Cnt decide btwn Z or a S
iwannaplaycod 1 year ago
@iwannaplaycod S more fun to drive (i have had both and i kept my S2k =D )
bboykingp 1 year ago
@iwannaplaycod Z
JGoodwin1016 1 year ago
to bad you can get a s2k for 8-9 grand :o!
womblesmurf 1 year ago
@womblesmurf and you can get a 350z 2006 for about 12-14 grand, or at least when i looked around that's what i saw. I'd rather have a 370z tho haha
Xavier1EXE 1 year ago
Whats year model on both cars?
01hidefinition92 1 year ago
i dont hink stock Zs churp 3rd gear....just saying....cause my buddy has one and i believe 2nd cause my S2000 does it too...but 3rd? lol....i dont own a Z so i really dont know
s2kvick 1 year ago
350z > s2k ^ ^
adutls kids
dk8730 1 year ago
350z > s2k ^ ^
adutls kids
dk8730 1 year ago
@dk8730 Redlining and smashing ur car to bits < driving like a normal person and hitting the right shifts
kids < adults
Xavier1EXE 1 year ago
i have a z you fucking idiot he just has mufflers on it u can see if you look closely b/c mine sounds like that b/c i took mine off completely so stfu. i understand honda's are for kids ok but try not to act like it when you never have a chance against a nissan
dk8730 1 year ago
@dk8730 all depends on the driver unless u put a heavily modified car up against a stock car, than yea we know who will win the race ... generally, the same skilled driver in a honda s2k and a nissan 350z stock for stock, the Z should take each time theoretically, but all depends on the situation and driver of course
Xavier1EXE 1 year ago
I have heard stock 350zs before. that is modified!!!!!!!!!s2000 is stock and just needed a new intake and it would keep up.
tw702 1 year ago
all nice cars. I still went with s2k despite the slightly more power the z has (depends on model). Why? because the s2000 is a true sports car, when you drive it, it feels as such. When you drive a 350z the power is nice but it feels like a maxima sedan minus 2 seats (which is quite accurate based on the chassis alone.) Still both great cars that can put smiles on the owners faces.
mucura1 1 year ago 5
although s2k is light..it lacks the displacement the 350z has...the z has more power and more torque..check the stats out but both are great cars tho!
teggsr13 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
handling... S2000>350z
50-50 weight dist..... S2000>350z
forged internals.... S2000>350z
built for track use..... s2000>350z
119HP per liter..... S2000>350z
need i say more?
jimakosoctavia21 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
handling... S2000>350z
50-50 weight dist..... S2000>350z
forged internals.... S2000>350z
built for track use..... s2000>350z
120HP per liter..... S2000>350z
need i say more?
jimakosoctavia21 1 year ago
That isn't an Alberto?
Nosnibor 1 year ago
Both amazing cars, but I'd keep the S2000 for its rarity factor/fun factor. Not saying the 350z is not fun, because it is.
WhiteWingedKnight 1 year ago
Not bad for a four banger
caLi2o9 1 year ago
s2k has a fast start off, but 350z picks up ground no doubt
01hidefinition92 1 year ago
@blueceligts180 the si was never rear wheel drive Damn Trollensteinowitz your always bashing on comments what do you drive
WhoSpraysAreYouGay 1 year ago
import>muscle any day. period. dont any ego brained people tell me different. i stand by imports. and always will.
InsanityRewritten 1 year ago
ha the gear ratio is like exactly the same in both cars
downhiller88 2 years ago
Comment removed
elms350z 2 years ago
MrUSAJAY really? My S2000 is heavily modified in performance and aesthetics. Never heard " Cute " or " looks like a Miata " before.
I've always gotten a smile and at times phone numbers. You seem to be a bit biased just because you own a 350z.
I used to own a 350z because it was given to me as a company benefit car. I must say I strongly prefer the S2000 over 350Z.
If you were so concerned about the " chicks " , I'm sure you could have coughed up 10 grand more and gotten yourself a Boxter.
hillsong1004 2 years ago
Comment removed
EricHx85 2 years ago
don't forget Alberto has about 600 to the wheels
mstreamer9991 2 years ago
stock for stock the s2k lacks the power to keep up with the Z, if you think the s2k can run with a z (stock for stock) then you need to re-educated yourself on your statistics
Vgoalie 2 years ago 25
Hay nut sack! the s2k is a sports car, who gives a fuck about straight line performance. put both cars on a track. stock with the same driver tell me what car is faster.
myassright 2 years ago
Maybe.. but if you think a stock 350z can pull a .93 G Skid or out handle a stock S2K on an actual roadcourse YOU my friend need to re-educate yourself. These are 2 different animals. The Z weighs about 500-600 pounds more and has much more torque, about 100 more.
clippersfan2004 2 years ago
I have an SRT4 that will demolish any Z or S2000 that's not running a high powered turbo set up, but something about the S2K's stability and handling is something else. I bought a 2001 AP1 With only 1400 miles. I know going in a Z will smoke me light to light.. but i live near the mountains and would happily challenge a Z there.
clippersfan2004 2 years ago
ill race you in my 05 wrx sti without my turbo in it
clipintheak1 2 years ago
LMAO. Wanna race my SRT4 running 20 PSI??? Not to mention your STI would get crushed by a stock S2K anyways if you removed the turbo. I'm not sure where you're going with this. Maybe you're jealous because your car is terrible. Anyone that gets an STI should of gotten an Evo. Your car can never get over 400 HP on a stock block. Plus it handles like shit for being AWD.
clippersfan2004 2 years ago
get your math straight a hr 350z weighs 3300 pounds and the s2k around 2900 pounds that does not equal to 500-600 pound difference AT MOST 400 pounds
flodhi1 2 years ago
No... the AP1 weighs 2750-2800. The AP2 gained over 100 pounds. So we are still talking a 500 pound difference. Regardless a stock Z handles worse ; x. I've been cruising to auto cross. I've seen it with my own eyes. S2K's>350Z including HR at auto cross.
clippersfan2004 2 years ago
hmm okay well the AP2 is around 2865 some pounds which comes down to around 400 pounds not 600 pounds. regardless man you can say it handles better that's upto you dude, of course a car with no power would handle better lol look at the rx-8 theres no fucking power to handle? lmao seriously.
flodhi1 2 years ago
Car with no power? Ever hear of power to weight? A Lotus has less than 200 HP but will leave your Z about 10 cars behind. The S2K produces more power per liter than any piston engine car on the planet. We have talked on other videos and i love the Z, but i don't like when you make it sound like the Z is a supercar. Like everything else it's flawed. It has nothing to do with power on the track, it comes down to the S2K having a superior chassis.
clippersfan2004 2 years ago 8
The Z is a quicker car, i never claimed it wasn't. If you want the better handling track car in stock form though, S2K all day. Many tests and races have proven my theory.
clippersfan2004 2 years ago
i already raced a lotus and beat him by half a car the Lotus just like the HR runs low 13s but has low trap speeds. you guys with your shyt don't even get the facts straight yeah the lotus is fast but its DEFINATELY not what u said because if it was he would have pulled on me. Power to weight ratio thats why rx8 weighs close to 3100 pounds thats 200 pounds less than the 350z, if the rx8 was 2500 pounds I COULD UNDERSTAND your power to weight ratio but the rx8 fukin weighs 3053-3100 pounds!
flodhi1 2 years ago
On every video you beat everyones car. I bet you beat Ferrari's all the time man. Nobody was insulting the Z. I said stock for stock the S2K handles better but is a little slower, calm down. I've seen a Lotus Elise race an HR Z on the freeway and smoke one, trust me they track time may be similar but not in a real world situation. They test in perfect weather, perfect sea level and perfect tarmac.
clippersfan2004 2 years ago
Plus i never specified which Lotus! ;p. I could of been talking about the Lotus Espirit V8 turbo from 98 that runs mid 12s-high 12s. You'de probably beat that too though huh?
clippersfan2004 2 years ago
oh the lotus espirit v8 turbo would rape me its just like a lexus IS F and i don't even want to get started when i raced my friend IS F hes actually on youtube him username is cayman driver he raped me by 3.5 + car lengths. the facts are facts man i thought you were talking about the elise which is pretty much a car even with the hr 350z, the espirit yeah no doubt, dude im not a fan boy bro, you might think im a youtube racer but man i do this shyt every day with every legit car, thats my life.
flodhi1 2 years ago
dude i don't beat ferraris and i am by far a fan boy, youre just boosting up the lotus like its some street racing monster when it isnt man. YES THE LOTUS IS fast but ure comment of oh it would leave car lengths on u gimmy a break guy, I RACE i fukin RACE thats what I DO i don't sit behind youtube talkin all this crap i dont care if a lotus pulled on a hr 350z i dont know anything abt the driving skills of that guy dude i pull 6 car lengths on a fukin s2k u call that a bluff go look at the vid.
flodhi1 2 years ago
@clippersfan2004
"The S2K produces more power per liter than any piston engine car on the planet"
A true test to hond's engineering. Thier engines are amazing. The K series has really succeeded the b series. actually the Ferrari 458 has the highest hp per liter NA.
The s200 has a higher HP per liter than the viper by far, but the viper is still a much faster car. hp/l doesnt mean shit when there are 500hp+ cars wil less hp per liter. stupid stat.
krazzyyo2 4 months ago
Power has NOTHING to do with handling you ricer. I guess an ferrari Enzo can't handle because it has 650hp. The reason why they handle so well is because the RX8 weighs 3050lbs, and the S2000 weighs 2850lbs. It's weight not power. Now to save weight most use small engines, which subesequently does lower power output but power doesn't have any effect on handling.
koukicrisp 2 years ago 2
@koukicrisp wellllll.... How much power are you talking here? Do enough mods to get enough power out of something and it is going to be harder to handle.....
dethpig420 2 years ago
power delivery has to do with handling in a sense
macdaddy08 2 years ago
and i think he is talkin keeping it straight when at WOT
macdaddy08 2 years ago
Power does have to do with cornering. If you have too much, the car will spin the tires, and spinning the tires will definitely affect how the car is turning. Also with AWD cars, the amount of power being put out into the road will determine how much understeer it gets.
xtelevisionset 1 year ago
@xtelevisionset not necessarily, maybe your need for better handling increases but handling itself will not change. Given that the S2k pulls .95G if you add 100hp it'll still pull .95G. If it does 60-0 in 115ft. regardless of extra HP it'll still do the same numbers, the only thing that changes is the need for handling, maybe at 400hp in a S2k .95G is not adequate, maybe youll need some fatter tires, but the numbers and handling characteristics does not change.
koukicrisp 1 year ago
@koukicrisp you're correct for the most part. but you ever watch a 67 shelby cobra replica try to autocross? they handle for shit because they have too much power to weight. you barely tap the gas coming out of a turn an they lose it almost everytime. yes i understand that has a lot to do with the driver knowing the car. but its seriously unbelievably difficult to control. the thing about the s2000 and rx8 is they have very little torque, which makes for easier to control.
havna444 1 year ago
@havna444 small engines just require less skill.
keeepitpg 1 year ago
@Vgoalie Um, really? And your on youtube? Search, and you will find many stock for stock s2k's pulling on 350's.
ian02se 1 year ago
@ian02se Thank you! Some one with some education.
RapturedPain 1 year ago
@ian02se i havent found one yet...
JGoodwin1016 1 year ago
@Vgoalie YOU need to read it. The s2k runs almost identical times as the 350Z.
RapturedPain 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
350z > s2k ^ ^
adutls kids
dk8730 1 year ago
@Vgoalie you really need to educate yourself more if your going to argue that the s2k cant run with a Z based on "STATISTICS".
please visit the site:wwwzeroto60timescom/ where you will see that both cars according to their respective years are about the same as they both hit 14.1 in the quarter mile. thank you... pwned
tenjinnim 1 year ago
@Vgoalie wow u are one ignorant s.o.b... :)
AngelFireXI 10 months ago
@Vgoalie LOL s2000 is faster than a z from a dig for 1/4 mile
dicktp 10 months ago
@Vgoalie re-educated LOL
nickL7389 8 months ago
wow the Z beat the s2000 with a passenger in it then the Z raped the s2000 w/o the pass. in my eyes i see the 350z an all out better car :).
NissanTy 2 years ago 3
im wondering cuz im a noob wen it comes to cars is a 2003 350z all stock still fast???
P3L0N805 2 years ago
yezzir
iriekid15 2 years ago 2
nice cars, street racing is very stupid and ill-minded. keep it on the track please.
00blackap1 2 years ago
if the z is an early model 03, 04 the s2000 will beat it.
camirocz 2 years ago
No. The difference is that a newer Z will beat the S2000 MORE than an older one.
ambientflier 2 years ago 2
bull, an early 350z 03, 04 will not take an s2000 trust me we ve done those races many times ...a370z is another story though. an 03, 04 350z is a 14.2 or 14.3 car while any year s2000 can go 14.0 even 13.9
camirocz 2 years ago
Any year Z can hit 13's, even the old ones. Fastest time for an '03 stock on the forums is 13.6, and 13.7 in motortrend.
ambientflier 2 years ago
x2. i hit 13.9 bone stocj
boostedz 2 years ago
aint no 03 350z running 13.6 only in your dreams
camirocz 2 years ago
Sure...you're the expert here, right? Too bad motortrend got a 13.7 out of their 2003 track model 5 years ago, and many people on the Z forums have hit 13.6 since then.
ambientflier 2 years ago 3
You are retarded. I have an 03 350z and I've smoked every S2000 ive raced.
brink2012 2 years ago 3
before you call anyone retarded ,look in the mirror you idiot.
camirocz 2 years ago
03 and 04 to 04.5Z vq35de has more tq than the newer except the vq35hr
turtleboyattacks 2 years ago
The old de motors have 274 ft lbs. No other stock 350 has more.
mstreamer9991 2 years ago
its funny how people buy these expensive "fast" cars when you can take a honda and put at most 3k into in a own everyone on the streets. thats why everyone hates them. silmpy jelous cause it take little money to make a fast car. keep it up
gansterdiciple 2 years ago
well you can put 3k into almost any car and make someone with a more expensive fast car jealous.
ericjackson40 2 years ago
the s2000 is the only honda besides nsx Id get its not about putting less money into the car than other cars to make it quicker that I hate or am jealous of it's the fact that all hondas except for ones mentioned are fwd thts a deal breaker right there and they feel very cheap inside
arwblink1822 2 years ago
Whoa bro, don't xclude the SI just cuz it's fwd. I have the new si and it's a great car, yea it is a bummer bn fwd when it would b rwd lyk the s2000. But if u haven't u shud try out the new si's they're nice and the reall beast is the honda RR mugen which is a sexy beast lol though still fwd ; (
blueceligts180 2 years ago
i have to agree. went up against an si. from the little we raced, it held its own.
BrickMuffin 2 years ago
@blueceligts180
No it isn't, you think it is ecause you wish you had a fast car. It's a slow FWD POS and you know it.
No the RR MUGEN whatever triple ultra super faggot tuned honda that's only available in 1 country on a leap year is STILL SLOW AS FUCK.
So what if they spent an extra 2,000$ on expensive useless springs shocks/struts, etc. It's still a slow FWD POS and you know it.
Trollensteinowitz 2 years ago
Wow bro that was really uncalled for but newayz the si meugen rr has a stronger engine then the standard si while still n/a putting out 240hp. The si is a nice car for it's price, speed, 4banger n/a engine, and features. If you don't like the si that's cool not everyone is but I do like my car and the si's i do wish they kept them rwd lyk they use to be and in fact they had higher torque in the older modles and hp too.
blueceligts180 2 years ago
@blueceligts180
It's still SLOW 240HP IS NOTHING
NO IT ISN'T
BLAH BLAH FOR IT'S PRICE BLAH BLAH, TOO BAD FOR A CAR IT SUCKS.
Yea you like your car because you'r epoor and can't get anything better. LOL like they used to be.
Just die
Trollensteinowitz 2 years ago
whatever you say bro.
blueceligts180 2 years ago
Westfields have around 240 hp and will beat pretty much anything on a track or on a roll start. That includes Bugattis and Ferraris.
xtelevisionset 1 year ago
difference is so big b/c honda's high reving high HP engines have almost as much TQ as a lawn mower.... jk lol.
"horsepower sells cars TQ wins races"<-- quote i hears somewhere
NIGHTMAREuki 2 years ago
"Horsepower sells cars, Torque wins races" That's an old Carol Shelby Quote im pretty sure.
rileybrigden 2 years ago
i have a Z and i walk on s2k's all day. i have intake exhaust and test pipes and i take modded s2k's by like 2 cars
dolfan1287 2 years ago
Video!
LikMiDik 2 years ago 2
bullshit
camirocz 2 years ago
Why? Stock Z is faster than a stock S. Modded Z is faster than a modded S. Makes sense to me.
ambientflier 2 years ago
you are not right an early z is slower than an s2000 and a s2000 with a turbo will kill any 350z
camirocz 2 years ago
U camirocz is a stupid moron, STFU! early model Zs 03/04 are the fastest Zs next to the HR due to their lighter weight. Stop talking out your ass, any year Z is faster than any year S2k stock vs stock in a straight line.
onungamon22 2 years ago
loser the only moron here is the one you look at every morning when you wake up and stare into the mirror.If you dont know then shut up punk.
camirocz 2 years ago
dont be mad Zs are faster than S2k Stock vs Stock lol. U sound like a lil kid, do u even have a car??? Fastest stock DE Z ran 13.6, fastest stock HR Z ran 13.1
onungamon22 2 years ago 11
yea its true Z's are faster stock vs stock on the straight, but the S2000's a cornering machine take this to the winding roads and its a different story.
f0gGenxk 2 years ago
@onungamon22 Your wrong the fastest DE was a 04 with just full bolt ons and drag tires ran low 13's. Its possible. Time slips can be seen on my350z.com
specvtypepnoy 10 months ago
@specvtypepnoy wtf are you talking about? lol im very well known on my350z, i said stock DE runs 13.6, bolts ons and drag radials isn't stock is it?
onungamon22 10 months ago
@onungamon22 Take a look at the message i sent u from my350z thread and look at veetec's posting which is the 7th sn down the list.
and this thread was a argument over the DE, REV UP AND HR.
specvtypepnoy 10 months ago
@specvtypepnoy dude wtf you serious? Did i not say Stock!?!?! thats modded bro. I said a stock DE will run 13.6 and it will not run 13.1 like you said. Again stock STOCK stock STOCK! wtf you smoking?
onungamon22 10 months ago
this comment is retarded. "spend 7000$ to boost a s2k and it will kill a 350z"
turtleboyattacks 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
its not 7000 dollars ,and even both stock 03,04 350 will lose to a stock s 2000 .
camirocz 2 years ago
ha, good one
turtleboyattacks 2 years ago
no way fat boy
Dave2662 2 years ago
who is the fat one you or me???? probably you since you dont fit in an s 2000.
camirocz 2 years ago
go bang a goat faggot, then go back to the zoo where u belong
asshole
Dave2662 2 years ago
Give it up you stubborn old fart. 350z wins every time. You can't afford either car stay in canada with your moose!!
mstreamer9991 2 years ago
everyone has their opinions
mine i think the 350z is way better
looking the the s2k....
MiissMaryy 3 years ago
Looks:350z>S2k
Speed:350z>S2k
350z>S2k
onungamon22 3 years ago
350z = v6, 2sk = in4... 350z = straights, s2k = curves. not a fair match up.
both gorgeous
barghtea 3 years ago
you might want to fix that. a z will take a s2000 on a road course any day of the week. there have been many test done that show this.
boostedz 2 years ago
hey i love my z, i can make it do anything. you have a z? boostedz? specs?
barghtea 2 years ago
While you are right that a Z will take the Honda on a track, it's mostly due to the better acceleration that makes up for the slightly worse handling. I don't think anyone can really argue that the Honda doesn't handle better, because it does.
ambientflier 2 years ago
have you ever seen a white s2k lowered with bronze advan rims.... ?? prob the most gorgeous thing ever. I would have bought one over my Z if I wasn't such a torque-aholic. Both great cars, preference is all it comes down to.
ZeerXX 2 years ago
The passenger was 150 lbs!
Not a big guy at all, both drivers are very equally matched shifting wise and consistent at the track.
dbtrackz33 3 years ago 2
see y u need a 2jz s2000. so this type of things dont happen just an op
ADturbos2k 3 years ago
he was out of vtec
s2kidd 3 years ago 2
LOL
dsm2xtreme 3 years ago
Z is faster, but 2000 is better looking
kinwai2727 3 years ago
And you are blind
350z >S2k but the s2k is my second choice of car
onungamon22 3 years ago
speed: 350Z > S2K
style: S2K > 350Z
shocxy 3 years ago
so true.
shocxy 3 years ago
wow the 1 extra person in the car made it that much slower?
xaxnewxme 3 years ago
I've never seen a passenger make that big of a difference. Is he a sumo wrestler??
oNAGAo 3 years ago
they said a 150 lbs passenger... thats about what i weigh right now... i need to go back to 105 lbs... weight matters... especialy on hondas w/ no torque...
st185driver 3 years ago
lol, Z chirping 2nd and 3rd! I love my Z
jray8 3 years ago