Added: 3 years ago
From: MaxiTuningZone
Views: 55,547
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (169)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I have owned both of these cars and the Z hands down is a much better car. It rides more like a race car drives more like a race car and has gobs more power and torque. The Honda is better on an autocross track but it seems so cheap though. That fat z ass doesn't doesnt come around without sliding it. There just ain't enough room in those courses for a powersliding car.

    @Knight353- get rid of the 4 feet worth of low end robbing cats and that 350 becomes a new animal entirely.

  • Another "I was running low boost" video brought to you by Alberto

  • Hah! I offend you all! I own a Z4! :P

  • it's... so... pixelated... i think mario and luigi as driving to save peach from bowser... ;P

  • s2k all the way!! s2k was stock..fo sho..z had mods

  • @jmun28x haha..shut up fag..you idiot.

  • @krazzyyo2 lol u can be all talk..but lets settle this on the black top..lets see whose a fag and a idiot...u can talk shit all u want on the internet

  • @jmun28x I say your the fag for quoting The Fast and the Furious in an internet car argument :)

  • @V35Skyline350GT and i say ur the fag cuz u had no business in this

  • i have a 350 and they honestly dont have much power in 1st and 2nd..but in 3rd and 4th they haul ass..ive never driven a s2k but i would bet the 350z comes with a lot more torque and the top end of those things is sickk

  • albertos stock 350z. so cute lol.

  • I dont care which one is faster i rather have a Z than a s2000 anyday.

  • Fucking hate S2000's..they're wack! HAIL TO THE Z

  • Everyone has their preferences, which is fair and understood; but many of you need to stop posting nonsense and learn to present your arguments maturely! No one purchases sports cars because of their resale value, not to mention that the Honda brand clearly has a better resale value than Nissan. And yes, these cars were in roughly the same price bracket, so they fall in the same category. However, they are obviously two very different cars, and thus, people love them for very different reasons.

  • Horsepower doesn't mean shit if your torque sucks ass. I don't like to be pinging red lines just to keep up.

  • I've owned both cars before but it'd say the Z would win if the driver is better, I seen Z's consistantly run 13.5-14.5 in GA, I usually see s2000's run 14.2-15.5's. Especially with the New HR the 350z Has the s2000 would not keep up. People keep saying turbo the s2000, but if you think about it both these cars are about the same price off the lot so they're in the same class, turboing the s2000 would be unfair just because s2000 owners think it's unfair, they're in the same class

  • Both cars are a blast to drive!

    

  • Doesn't look like the S was trying the second run. Silly rabbit, tricks are for kids!! :P

  • nice kill

  • ehh I think the s2k did fine the first run. kept up fairly well. 2.2 liter vs a 3.0 liter?? hands down to the honda.

  • @auomauom 3.5 litter, i'll rather have the Z any day, i bet the resale value of any nissan is better than that of honda.

  • waxed

  • s2k's r the slowest car(stock) in its price range. they scream "MOD ME" as soon as you pull it off the lot.

  • u guys r all failing to troll each other which is the sad part. who cares who's faster even though the Z def is. LOL

  • heh why i got out of the import market. i do miss my 370z it atleast could break 12's with boltons.

  • /watch?v=zKNdECv2Zs0&feature=e­mail&email=comment_received

  • Horsepower to weight ratio!!! Mother f u c k e r s shut the hell up about saying " I want to see a turbo s2000 go against a z" shut up, seriously? Then reduce the weight of the 350z to match the weight of s2000, really stop sounding like ignorant idiots

  • What year are they

  • you guys are talking about stock vs stock, why not take it too the track and dont give your shit "saying you need to re-educate yourself on your statistics" because if anything you need too!

  • Put them on a track n lets see who beats who....

  • @OtakuJdm

    S2K would lose. Especially now.

  • @JS04 I still doubt it but, everyone is entitled to their opinion. Of course SK2 would need to do some serious power additions.

  • @OtakuJdm

    You should look up the rest of Albertos vids and see what he upgraded. Like I said, S2K would lose.

  • Z FUCKED U UP!

  • Honestly stock for stock a de and s2k will be a good run. That 350z has full bolt ons don't forget. The N1 exhaust is the old mod on the s2k . And that exhaust is 60 mm lol.

  • guy in the Z knows how to shift

  • Hondas are for kids? Guess I'm a kid then. Of course a 300hp v6 is going to win against a 4 cyl, but I'd like to see a 350z take on a stage 1 turbo s2k... That'd be nice

  • @DivinityOfDoom I'd like to see a stage 1 turbo s2k take on a stage 1 turbo 350z... That's also be nice

  • im getting my first car and am a huge car fanatic.. have been intrested in cars since i was 5. Cnt decide btwn Z or a S

  • @iwannaplaycod S more fun to drive (i have had both and i kept my S2k =D )

  • to bad you can get a s2k for 8-9 grand :o!

  • @womblesmurf and you can get a 350z 2006 for about 12-14 grand, or at least when i looked around that's what i saw. I'd rather have a 370z tho haha

  • Whats year model on both cars?

  • i dont hink stock Zs churp 3rd gear....just saying....cause my buddy has one and i believe 2nd cause my S2000 does it too...but 3rd? lol....i dont own a Z so i really dont know

  • 350z > s2k ^  ^

    adutls kids

  • 350z > s2k ^  ^

    adutls kids

  • @dk8730 Redlining and smashing ur car to bits < driving like a normal person and hitting the right shifts

    kids < adults

  • i have a z you fucking idiot he just has mufflers on it u can see if you look closely b/c mine sounds like that b/c i took mine off completely so stfu. i understand honda's are for kids ok but try not to act like it when you never have a chance against a nissan

  • @dk8730 all depends on the driver unless u put a heavily modified car up against a stock car, than yea we know who will win the race ... generally, the same skilled driver in a honda s2k and a nissan 350z stock for stock, the Z should take each time theoretically, but all depends on the situation and driver of course

  • I have heard stock 350zs before. that is modified!!!!!!!!!s2000 is stock and just needed a new intake and it would keep up.

  • all nice cars. I still went with s2k despite the slightly more power the z has (depends on model). Why? because the s2000 is a true sports car, when you drive it, it feels as such. When you drive a 350z the power is nice but it feels like a maxima sedan minus 2 seats (which is quite accurate based on the chassis alone.) Still both great cars that can put smiles on the owners faces.

  • although s2k is light..it lacks the displacement the 350z has...the z has more power and more torque..check the stats out but both are great cars tho!

  • That isn't an Alberto?

  • Both amazing cars, but I'd keep the S2000 for its rarity factor/fun factor. Not saying the 350z is not fun, because it is.

  • Not bad for a four banger

  • s2k has a fast start off, but 350z picks up ground no doubt

  • @blueceligts180 the si was never rear wheel drive Damn Trollensteinowitz your always bashing on comments what do you drive

  • import>muscle any day. period. dont any ego brained people tell me different. i stand by imports. and always will.

  • ha the gear ratio is like exactly the same in both cars

  • Comment removed

  • MrUSAJAY really? My S2000 is heavily modified in performance and aesthetics. Never heard " Cute " or " looks like a Miata " before.

    I've always gotten a smile and at times phone numbers. You seem to be a bit biased just because you own a 350z.

    I used to own a 350z because it was given to me as a company benefit car. I must say I strongly prefer the S2000 over 350Z.

    If you were so concerned about the " chicks " , I'm sure you could have coughed up 10 grand more and gotten yourself a Boxter.

  • Comment removed

  • don't forget Alberto has about 600 to the wheels

  • stock for stock the s2k lacks the power to keep up with the Z, if you think the s2k can run with a z (stock for stock) then you need to re-educated yourself on your statistics

  • Hay nut sack! the s2k is a sports car, who gives a fuck about straight line performance. put both cars on a track. stock with the same driver tell me what car is faster.

  • Maybe.. but if you think a stock 350z can pull a .93 G Skid or out handle a stock S2K on an actual roadcourse YOU my friend need to re-educate yourself. These are 2 different animals. The Z weighs about 500-600 pounds more and has much more torque, about 100 more.

  • I have an SRT4 that will demolish any Z or S2000 that's not running a high powered turbo set up, but something about the S2K's stability and handling is something else. I bought a 2001 AP1 With only 1400 miles. I know going in a Z will smoke me light to light.. but i live near the mountains and would happily challenge a Z there.

  • ill race you in my 05 wrx sti without my turbo in it

  • LMAO. Wanna race my SRT4 running 20 PSI??? Not to mention your STI would get crushed by a stock S2K anyways if you removed the turbo. I'm not sure where you're going with this. Maybe you're jealous because your car is terrible. Anyone that gets an STI should of gotten an Evo. Your car can never get over 400 HP on a stock block. Plus it handles like shit for being AWD.

  • get your math straight a hr 350z weighs 3300 pounds and the s2k around 2900 pounds that does not equal to 500-600 pound difference AT MOST 400 pounds

  • No... the AP1 weighs 2750-2800. The AP2 gained over 100 pounds. So we are still talking a 500 pound difference. Regardless a stock Z handles worse ; x. I've been cruising to auto cross. I've seen it with my own eyes. S2K's>350Z including HR at auto cross.

  • hmm okay well the AP2 is around 2865 some pounds which comes down to around 400 pounds not 600 pounds. regardless man you can say it handles better that's upto you dude, of course a car with no power would handle better lol look at the rx-8 theres no fucking power to handle? lmao seriously.

  • Car with no power? Ever hear of power to weight? A Lotus has less than 200 HP but will leave your Z about 10 cars behind. The S2K produces more power per liter than any piston engine car on the planet. We have talked on other videos and i love the Z, but i don't like when you make it sound like the Z is a supercar. Like everything else it's flawed. It has nothing to do with power on the track, it comes down to the S2K having a superior chassis.

  • The Z is a quicker car, i never claimed it wasn't. If you want the better handling track car in stock form though, S2K all day. Many tests and races have proven my theory.

  • i already raced a lotus and beat him by half a car the Lotus just like the HR runs low 13s but has low trap speeds. you guys with your shyt don't even get the facts straight yeah the lotus is fast but its DEFINATELY not what u said because if it was he would have pulled on me. Power to weight ratio thats why rx8 weighs close to 3100 pounds thats 200 pounds less than the 350z, if the rx8 was 2500 pounds I COULD UNDERSTAND your power to weight ratio but the rx8 fukin weighs 3053-3100 pounds!

  • On every video you beat everyones car. I bet you beat Ferrari's all the time man. Nobody was insulting the Z. I said stock for stock the S2K handles better but is a little slower, calm down. I've seen a Lotus Elise race an HR Z on the freeway and smoke one, trust me they track time may be similar but not in a real world situation. They test in perfect weather, perfect sea level and perfect tarmac.

  • Plus i never specified which Lotus! ;p. I could of been talking about the Lotus Espirit V8 turbo from 98 that runs mid 12s-high 12s. You'de probably beat that too though huh?

  • oh the lotus espirit v8 turbo would rape me its just like a lexus IS F and i don't even want to get started when i raced my friend IS F hes actually on youtube him username is cayman driver he raped me by 3.5 + car lengths. the facts are facts man i thought you were talking about the elise which is pretty much a car even with the hr 350z, the espirit yeah no doubt, dude im not a fan boy bro, you might think im a youtube racer but man i do this shyt every day with every legit car, thats my life.

  • dude i don't beat ferraris and i am by far a fan boy, youre just boosting up the lotus like its some street racing monster when it isnt man. YES THE LOTUS IS fast but ure comment of oh it would leave car lengths on u gimmy a break guy, I RACE i fukin RACE thats what I DO i don't sit behind youtube talkin all this crap i dont care if a lotus pulled on a hr 350z i dont know anything abt the driving skills of that guy dude i pull 6 car lengths on a fukin s2k u call that a bluff go look at the vid.

  • @clippersfan2004

    "The S2K produces more power per liter than any piston engine car on the planet"

    A true test to hond's engineering. Thier engines are amazing. The K series has really succeeded the b series. actually the Ferrari 458 has the highest hp per liter NA.

    The s200 has a higher HP per liter than the viper by far, but the viper is still a much faster car. hp/l doesnt mean shit when there are 500hp+ cars wil less hp per liter. stupid stat.

  • Power has NOTHING to do with handling you ricer. I guess an ferrari Enzo can't handle because it has 650hp. The reason why they handle so well is because the RX8 weighs 3050lbs, and the S2000 weighs 2850lbs. It's weight not power. Now to save weight most use small engines, which subesequently does lower power output but power doesn't have any effect on handling.

  • @koukicrisp wellllll.... How much power are you talking here? Do enough mods to get enough power out of something and it is going to be harder to handle.....

  • power delivery has to do with handling in a sense

  • and i think he is talkin keeping it straight when at WOT

  • Power does have to do with cornering. If you have too much, the car will spin the tires, and spinning the tires will definitely affect how the car is turning. Also with AWD cars, the amount of power being put out into the road will determine how much understeer it gets.

  • @xtelevisionset not necessarily, maybe your need for better handling increases but handling itself will not change. Given that the S2k pulls .95G if you add 100hp it'll still pull .95G. If it does 60-0 in 115ft. regardless of extra HP it'll still do the same numbers, the only thing that changes is the need for handling, maybe at 400hp in a S2k .95G is not adequate, maybe youll need some fatter tires, but the numbers and handling characteristics does not change.

  • @koukicrisp you're correct for the most part. but you ever watch a 67 shelby cobra replica try to autocross?  they handle for shit because they have too much power to weight. you barely tap the gas coming out of a turn an they lose it almost everytime. yes i understand that has a lot to do with the driver knowing the car. but its seriously unbelievably difficult to control. the thing about the s2000 and rx8 is they have very little torque, which makes for easier to control.

  • @havna444 small engines just require less skill.

  • @Vgoalie Um, really? And your on youtube? Search, and you will find many stock for stock s2k's pulling on 350's.

  • @ian02se Thank you! Some one with some education.

  • @ian02se i havent found one yet...

  • @Vgoalie YOU need to read it. The s2k runs almost identical times as the 350Z.

  • @Vgoalie you really need to educate yourself more if your going to argue that the s2k cant run with a Z based on "STATISTICS".

    please visit the site:wwwzeroto60timescom/ where you will see that both cars according to their respective years are about the same as they both hit 14.1 in the quarter mile. thank you... pwned

  • @Vgoalie wow u are one ignorant s.o.b... :)

  • @Vgoalie LOL s2000 is faster than a z from a dig for 1/4 mile

  • @Vgoalie re-educated LOL

  • wow the Z beat the s2000 with a passenger in it then the Z raped the s2000 w/o the pass. in my eyes i see the 350z an all out better car :).

  • im wondering cuz im a noob wen it comes to cars is a 2003 350z all stock still fast???

  • yezzir

  • nice cars, street racing is very stupid and ill-minded. keep it on the track please.

  • if the z is an early model 03, 04 the s2000 will beat it.

  • No. The difference is that a newer Z will beat the S2000 MORE than an older one.

  • bull, an early 350z 03, 04 will not take an s2000 trust me we ve done those races many times ...a370z is another story though. an 03, 04 350z is a 14.2 or 14.3 car while any year s2000 can go 14.0 even 13.9

  • Any year Z can hit 13's, even the old ones. Fastest time for an '03 stock on the forums is 13.6, and 13.7 in motortrend.

  • x2. i hit 13.9 bone stocj

  • aint no 03 350z running 13.6 only in your dreams

  • Sure...you're the expert here, right? Too bad motortrend got a 13.7 out of their 2003 track model 5 years ago, and many people on the Z forums have hit 13.6 since then.

  • You are retarded. I have an 03 350z and I've smoked every S2000 ive raced.

  • before you call anyone retarded ,look in the mirror you idiot.

  • 03 and 04 to 04.5Z vq35de has more tq than the newer except the vq35hr

  • The old de motors have 274 ft lbs. No other stock 350 has more.

  • its funny how people buy these expensive "fast" cars when you can take a honda and put at most 3k into in a own everyone on the streets. thats why everyone hates them. silmpy jelous cause it take little money to make a fast car. keep it up

  • well you can put 3k into almost any car and make someone with a more expensive fast car jealous.

  • the s2000 is the only honda besides nsx Id get its not about putting less money into the car than other cars to make it quicker that I hate or am jealous of it's the fact that all hondas except for ones mentioned are fwd thts a deal breaker right there and they feel very cheap inside

  • Whoa bro, don't xclude the SI just cuz it's fwd. I have the new si and it's a great car, yea it is a bummer bn fwd when it would b rwd lyk the s2000. But if u haven't u shud try out the new si's they're nice and the reall beast is the honda RR mugen which is a sexy beast lol though still fwd ; (

  • i have to agree. went up against an si. from the little we raced, it held its own.

  • @blueceligts180

    No it isn't, you think it is ecause you wish you had a fast car. It's a slow FWD POS and you know it.

    No the RR MUGEN whatever triple ultra super faggot tuned honda that's only available in 1 country on a leap year is STILL SLOW AS FUCK.

    So what if they spent an extra 2,000$ on expensive useless springs shocks/struts, etc. It's still a slow FWD POS and you know it.

  • Wow bro that was really uncalled for but newayz the si meugen rr has a stronger engine then the standard si while still n/a putting out 240hp. The si is a nice car for it's price, speed, 4banger n/a engine, and features. If you don't like the si that's cool not everyone is but I do like my car and the si's i do wish they kept them rwd lyk they use to be and in fact they had higher torque in the older modles and hp too.

  • @blueceligts180

    It's still SLOW 240HP IS NOTHING

    NO IT ISN'T

    BLAH BLAH FOR IT'S PRICE BLAH BLAH, TOO BAD FOR A CAR IT SUCKS.

    Yea you like your car because you'r epoor and can't get anything better. LOL like they used to be.

    Just die

  • whatever you say bro.

  • Westfields have around 240 hp and will beat pretty much anything on a track or on a roll start. That includes Bugattis and Ferraris.

  • difference is so big b/c honda's high reving high HP engines have almost as much TQ as a lawn mower.... jk lol.

    "horsepower sells cars TQ wins races"<-- quote i hears somewhere

  • "Horsepower sells cars, Torque wins races" That's an old Carol Shelby Quote im pretty sure.

  • i have a Z and i walk on s2k's all day. i have intake exhaust and test pipes and i take modded s2k's by like 2 cars

  • Video!

  • bullshit

  • Why? Stock Z is faster than a stock S. Modded Z is faster than a modded S. Makes sense to me.

  • you are not right an early z is slower than an s2000 and a s2000 with a turbo will kill any 350z

  • U camirocz is a stupid moron, STFU! early model Zs 03/04 are the fastest Zs next to the HR due to their lighter weight. Stop talking out your ass, any year Z is faster than any year S2k stock vs stock in a straight line.

  • loser the only moron here is the one you look at every morning when you wake up and stare into the mirror.If you dont know then shut up punk.

  • dont be mad Zs are faster than S2k Stock vs Stock lol. U sound like a lil kid, do u even have a car??? Fastest stock DE Z ran 13.6, fastest stock HR Z ran 13.1

  • yea its true Z's are faster stock vs stock on the straight, but the S2000's a cornering machine take this to the winding roads and its a different story.

  • @onungamon22 Your wrong the fastest DE was a 04 with just full bolt ons and drag tires ran low 13's. Its possible. Time slips can be seen on my350z.com

  • @specvtypepnoy wtf are you talking about? lol im very well known on my350z, i said stock DE runs 13.6, bolts ons and drag radials isn't stock is it?

  • @onungamon22 Take a look at the message i sent u from my350z thread and look at veetec's posting which is the 7th sn down the list.

    and this thread was a argument over the DE, REV UP AND HR.

  • @specvtypepnoy dude wtf you serious? Did i not say Stock!?!?! thats modded bro. I said a stock DE will run 13.6 and it will not run 13.1 like you said. Again stock STOCK stock STOCK! wtf you smoking?

  • this comment is retarded. "spend 7000$ to boost a s2k and it will kill a 350z"

  • ha, good one

  • no way fat boy

  • who is the fat one you or me???? probably you since you dont fit in an s 2000.

  • go bang a goat faggot, then go back to the zoo where u belong

    asshole

  • Give it up you stubborn old fart. 350z wins every time. You can't afford either car stay in canada with your moose!!

  • everyone has their opinions

    mine i think the 350z is way better

    looking the the s2k....

  • Looks:350z>S2k

    Speed:350z>S2k

    350z>S2k

  • 350z = v6, 2sk = in4... 350z = straights, s2k = curves. not a fair match up.

    both gorgeous

  • you might want to fix that. a z will take a s2000 on a road course any day of the week. there have been many test done that show this.

  • hey i love my z, i can make it do anything. you have a z? boostedz? specs?

  • While you are right that a Z will take the Honda on a track, it's mostly due to the better acceleration that makes up for the slightly worse handling. I don't think anyone can really argue that the Honda doesn't handle better, because it does.

  • have you ever seen a white s2k lowered with bronze advan rims.... ?? prob the most gorgeous thing ever. I would have bought one over my Z if I wasn't such a torque-aholic. Both great cars, preference is all it comes down to.

  • The passenger was 150 lbs!

    Not a big guy at all, both drivers are very equally matched shifting wise and consistent at the track.

  • see y u need a 2jz s2000. so this type of things dont happen just an op

  • he was out of vtec

  • LOL

  • Z is faster, but 2000 is better looking

  • And you are blind

    350z >S2k but the s2k is my second choice of car

  • speed: 350Z > S2K

    style: S2K > 350Z

  • so true.

  • wow the 1 extra person in the car made it that much slower?

  • I've never seen a passenger make that big of a difference. Is he a sumo wrestler??

  • they said a 150 lbs passenger... thats about what i weigh right now... i need to go back to 105 lbs... weight matters... especialy on hondas w/ no torque...

  • lol, Z chirping 2nd and 3rd! I love my Z

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more