All of what he is saying becomes apparent when we start doing what he is saying...i.e. actively participating in and sustaining presence without being swept away in qualifying thoughts about presence. And then, the need to phisolphize becomes obsolete...the need to debate and to fantasize. The proof is in the pudding, and it is absolutely marvelous..."emaho" as those of Dzogchen say. The raw experience of reality is rich beyond words....absolutely worth every ounce of effort to see it.
when i first learned (was shown/finally realized) appreciation = liberation and the truth about BEing, I thought "i need to tell everyone!" and that became a vary different experience (wife and some friends called me crazy:) and then i realized another thing and that was, they can not understand because I'm speaking from a perception they are incapable of seeing because i am "that" and they cant be where i am, because it's me and always has been. So why BE a guru, lecturer, author etc 2B ornot2b
When people talk about reincarnation they are taking about their EGO. The EGO does not exists is just another thought. When people die, the body desintegrates and that is all.
This person talks in Circles. He represents the over- mind-stimulated-unsexual-trustfund-Hinduist-mindF&*k-that entertains other confused people in Marin, Ca. with their overwhelming Self-Importance.
When reality is seen, no more mind. Mind is just thoughts captured by attention. Peter is right on target - all is imagination = the faculty or action of forming ideas, images or concepts, e.g., incarnation, reincarnation, etc.. There is no 'enlightenment' relative to an individual for there is no 'individual', only an idea of one due to a cluster of thoughts/concepts constituting the notion of I and other, hence, 'individuals'. Not difficult to see. It only requires an open mind.
All of what he is saying becomes apparent when we start doing what he is saying...i.e. actively participating in and sustaining presence without being swept away in qualifying thoughts about presence. And then, the need to phisolphize becomes obsolete...the need to debate and to fantasize. The proof is in the pudding, and it is absolutely marvelous..."emaho" as those of Dzogchen say. The raw experience of reality is rich beyond words....absolutely worth every ounce of effort to see it.
glypheye 1 month ago
when i first learned (was shown/finally realized) appreciation = liberation and the truth about BEing, I thought "i need to tell everyone!" and that became a vary different experience (wife and some friends called me crazy:) and then i realized another thing and that was, they can not understand because I'm speaking from a perception they are incapable of seeing because i am "that" and they cant be where i am, because it's me and always has been. So why BE a guru, lecturer, author etc 2B ornot2b
perceptionsevrything 4 months ago
truly wonder-full :) thank you !
cattis333 1 year ago
When people talk about reincarnation they are taking about their EGO. The EGO does not exists is just another thought. When people die, the body desintegrates and that is all.
acuaman42 1 year ago
Awsome...
oxen1957 2 years ago
This person talks in Circles. He represents the over- mind-stimulated-unsexual-trustfund-Hinduist-mindF&*k-that entertains other confused people in Marin, Ca. with their overwhelming Self-Importance.
xwaystranger 2 years ago
@xwaystranger it certainly sounds that way to me!
yuritim 2 months ago
When reality is seen, no more mind. Mind is just thoughts captured by attention. Peter is right on target - all is imagination = the faculty or action of forming ideas, images or concepts, e.g., incarnation, reincarnation, etc.. There is no 'enlightenment' relative to an individual for there is no 'individual', only an idea of one due to a cluster of thoughts/concepts constituting the notion of I and other, hence, 'individuals'. Not difficult to see. It only requires an open mind.
LourdesAB 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
To know what and who an incarnation is, is to know what an enlightenment is, relative to an individual who has become and is enlightened.
Apparently, Peter does not know what an enlightenment is or who is enlightened, because if he knew that knowledge he would teach it.
Jesus taught, you can not teach what you have not experienced.
mindbodyhealer 3 years ago
and how, may I ask, do you know that?
karljacobs 2 years ago
bright guy
guruwhore 3 years ago