aslaam waley come,the jews claime that 6 milion's jews was killed in the second world war, but they dont say any thing about others that had been stamped with the star but was not jews. a jew is juda judge who wrights historys with snake fake tounge lie's on the ground and wiggles giggles behind closed door's, when 30 milions of nomads mosslims and gyipys had been killed with the help of the king of united kingdom and india.waley come salaam.
Maybe the food critic obama can talk to them and they will hold hands and sing together or we should send blackwater to this protest to take care of our hamas problem.
First oil deal reached post US occupation was for Israel, brokered by Henry Kissinger. Israel takes what it wants thru aggression either directly of through manipulation of US. It did in 1967 and again in 2003.
1967 6 day war was a pre-emptive strike against an Egyptian military build up and calls for a united strike by the Arab nations against the Jews. It wasnt a war for land or oil. It was a war for its survival.
It was a strike for sure, sold as pre-emptive. This was not credible given the ease and quickness of the Israel route and given the facts they added large tracts of land. 1967 was not for oil -- it was for land and water. 2003 was for oil
It was definitely pre-emptive, to claim otherwise is to entirely ignorant of the preceding 19 years of hostilities. If it had been about land and water, Israel would have done it years earlier and with a greater efficacy than they did in the 6 day war.
A pre-emptive strike implies imminent danger. Israel kicked the crap out of the arabs in six days and took over significant tracks of land. How can you sit there and tell yourself there was imminent danger given that result? That was just the sales job; it was a war of expansionism from the get go. Israel discussed their plans with LBJ -- this is all in the public record
You are talking bubbles.... the war started due to Egypt and Syria, in fact Syria fitred the first munitions of the war on 7th April, war proper didnt start until 5th June. May 15th 1967 Israel sent a communication to Nasser stating "Israel wants to make it clear to the government of Egypt that it has no aggressive intentions whatsoever against any Arab state at all"
Egypt then throws out 3400 UNEF Obserers. Shuts the straits of Tiran, and subsequently mobilises 40,000 + troops in the Sinai...
22nd May The Syrian president Nureddin al-Attasi makes a speech to his troops "We want a full scale, popular war of liberation... to destroy the Zionist enemy"....
Now I wonder, should Israel sit tight or pre emptively strike???? Hmmmm not a hard decision....
For God's sakes, man. What a bunch of nonsense. How can a war won so quickly and easily and in which Israel added large swaths of land (and needed acess to water supplies) in any way be understood as a war needed to avoid annihilation. Apply a dab of reality please.
That is whats called a bunch of facts.... It was won so easily and quickly because the Israeli troops were better trained than the Arabs, they had a better air-force and they destroyed the Egyptian and Syrian air-forces on the ground. Therefore they had air superiority.... they held the Golan heights as a strategic position to stop Syria from firing on them as they had done on April 7th and at which front Syria attacked again in 1973. Military history/tactics isn't your strong point is it?
Why do you belittle facts? Us non Zionists form our opionions based on facts. As you make clear the Israelis were far superior militarily and strick first in 1967. How is this consistent with their excuse that their existence was threatened? The answer is, it isn't. The 1967 war was imperialism and they still illegally hold lands grabbed in that war.
You mean facts like Israel asking Jordan NOT to get involved in the war? Facts like the Israeli defence minister instructing the army NOT to enter the West Bank? Facts like Israel chasing the Jordanians out of the West Bank as a result of the shelling of the Tel Aviv suburbs and intensive shelling of West Jerusalem? Facts like Jordanian warplanes attacking the central Israeli towns of Netanya and Kfar Sava.... You mean facts like that? A poorly trained army can still inflict damage you retard.
Every time you destroy one line of arguement, they reverse and change tack. But it usually goes something like this: "there wern't that many Palestinians there" (backed up with a touch of out of context Mark Twain), in extreme cases there will be claims that in fact the land was basically empty; moving on, we get a bit of the old "Israel has to defend itself", then some pick'n'mix from various Zionist websites tailor made for apologists, before you're landed with "you're an anti semite"!
They start from the emotional view that Israel is right, or moral, or important, or whatever, and then twist the historical record in their heads to support their predisposition. They cannot be swayed by facts not logic. They have been victimized by life long pro Israeli propaganda along with the idea that Jews are a victimized minority. You know, that quite wealthy group that owns the US mass media.
As usual george is right,the american-backed israeli war for oil is corrupting all goverments in the "free world"the slave goverment in england and west europe are silent to this issue,only george has the balls to say it!So boycott israel+america!
aslaam waley come,the jews claime that 6 milion's jews was killed in the second world war, but they dont say any thing about others that had been stamped with the star but was not jews. a jew is juda judge who wrights historys with snake fake tounge lie's on the ground and wiggles giggles behind closed door's, when 30 milions of nomads mosslims and gyipys had been killed with the help of the king of united kingdom and india.waley come salaam.
seyeeyes 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Maybe the food critic obama can talk to them and they will hold hands and sing together or we should send blackwater to this protest to take care of our hamas problem.
wiferachel 3 years ago
He has a point, good thing that not all british parliment members are brainwashed by the zionist lies.
critic124 4 years ago
frits has problems.... the Israeli war for oil??? what was he doing in history class??
MOSSADAGENT969 4 years ago
First oil deal reached post US occupation was for Israel, brokered by Henry Kissinger. Israel takes what it wants thru aggression either directly of through manipulation of US. It did in 1967 and again in 2003.
oldjoe5 3 years ago
1967 6 day war was a pre-emptive strike against an Egyptian military build up and calls for a united strike by the Arab nations against the Jews. It wasnt a war for land or oil. It was a war for its survival.
Perseusishere 3 years ago
It was a strike for sure, sold as pre-emptive. This was not credible given the ease and quickness of the Israel route and given the facts they added large tracts of land. 1967 was not for oil -- it was for land and water. 2003 was for oil
oldjoe5 3 years ago
It was definitely pre-emptive, to claim otherwise is to entirely ignorant of the preceding 19 years of hostilities. If it had been about land and water, Israel would have done it years earlier and with a greater efficacy than they did in the 6 day war.
Perseusishere 3 years ago
A pre-emptive strike implies imminent danger. Israel kicked the crap out of the arabs in six days and took over significant tracks of land. How can you sit there and tell yourself there was imminent danger given that result? That was just the sales job; it was a war of expansionism from the get go. Israel discussed their plans with LBJ -- this is all in the public record
oldjoe5 3 years ago
You are talking bubbles.... the war started due to Egypt and Syria, in fact Syria fitred the first munitions of the war on 7th April, war proper didnt start until 5th June. May 15th 1967 Israel sent a communication to Nasser stating "Israel wants to make it clear to the government of Egypt that it has no aggressive intentions whatsoever against any Arab state at all"
Egypt then throws out 3400 UNEF Obserers. Shuts the straits of Tiran, and subsequently mobilises 40,000 + troops in the Sinai...
Perseusishere 3 years ago
22nd May The Syrian president Nureddin al-Attasi makes a speech to his troops "We want a full scale, popular war of liberation... to destroy the Zionist enemy"....
Now I wonder, should Israel sit tight or pre emptively strike???? Hmmmm not a hard decision....
Perseusishere 3 years ago
For God's sakes, man. What a bunch of nonsense. How can a war won so quickly and easily and in which Israel added large swaths of land (and needed acess to water supplies) in any way be understood as a war needed to avoid annihilation. Apply a dab of reality please.
oldjoe5 3 years ago
That is whats called a bunch of facts.... It was won so easily and quickly because the Israeli troops were better trained than the Arabs, they had a better air-force and they destroyed the Egyptian and Syrian air-forces on the ground. Therefore they had air superiority.... they held the Golan heights as a strategic position to stop Syria from firing on them as they had done on April 7th and at which front Syria attacked again in 1973. Military history/tactics isn't your strong point is it?
Perseusishere 3 years ago
Why do you belittle facts? Us non Zionists form our opionions based on facts. As you make clear the Israelis were far superior militarily and strick first in 1967. How is this consistent with their excuse that their existence was threatened? The answer is, it isn't. The 1967 war was imperialism and they still illegally hold lands grabbed in that war.
oldjoe5 3 years ago
You mean facts like Israel asking Jordan NOT to get involved in the war? Facts like the Israeli defence minister instructing the army NOT to enter the West Bank? Facts like Israel chasing the Jordanians out of the West Bank as a result of the shelling of the Tel Aviv suburbs and intensive shelling of West Jerusalem? Facts like Jordanian warplanes attacking the central Israeli towns of Netanya and Kfar Sava.... You mean facts like that? A poorly trained army can still inflict damage you retard.
Perseusishere 3 years ago
Every time you destroy one line of arguement, they reverse and change tack. But it usually goes something like this: "there wern't that many Palestinians there" (backed up with a touch of out of context Mark Twain), in extreme cases there will be claims that in fact the land was basically empty; moving on, we get a bit of the old "Israel has to defend itself", then some pick'n'mix from various Zionist websites tailor made for apologists, before you're landed with "you're an anti semite"!
scottyboisb 3 years ago
They start from the emotional view that Israel is right, or moral, or important, or whatever, and then twist the historical record in their heads to support their predisposition. They cannot be swayed by facts not logic. They have been victimized by life long pro Israeli propaganda along with the idea that Jews are a victimized minority. You know, that quite wealthy group that owns the US mass media.
oldjoe5 3 years ago
Bubbles? Did U have a stroke or something?
oldjoe5 3 years ago
I accused you of talking bubbles, why would that indicate I had suffered a stroke?? Unless you arent sure what bubbles are?
Perseusishere 3 years ago
I am afraid that is something "known" only to ypu --m and maybe to those other voices in your head
oldjoe5 3 years ago
You are clearly a waste of oxygen, now go away and play in the traffic, there's a good boy....
Perseusishere 3 years ago
Back to your bubbles
oldjoe5 3 years ago
You are Mossad and don't even know about that?
oldjoe5 3 years ago
George Galloway should be tried for treason. British blood is on your hands.
Just a bunch of art and media studies students with nothing better to do!
djviagra1156 4 years ago
Thats the truth djviagra. Galloway is a demagogue and a moral mess.
MOSSADAGENT969 4 years ago
British blood is on his hands cuz he tries to get the Brits out of a war sold on lies? The logic of a Zionist dupe
oldjoe5 3 years ago
No because Galloway stopped just short of inciting attacks on British troops in Iraq.... the Agent is right, he is a demagogue and a moral ruin.
Perseusishere 3 years ago
Galloway Rocks!!!
Go George!! Rid the world of those Religious Supremist Murderers in Israel!
ONE man ONE vote for Palestine!
RockJawTitus 4 years ago 4
God bless you George Galloway! Keep on the fight, boicot all Israeli and imperial war products!
argument777 4 years ago
As usual george is right,the american-backed israeli war for oil is corrupting all goverments in the "free world"the slave goverment in england and west europe are silent to this issue,only george has the balls to say it!So boycott israel+america!
frits1234567890 4 years ago 2
The Israeli war for oil???? what the bugger are you talking about you retard?
MOSSADAGENT969 4 years ago