A firm rear side is key to developing that kind of tension at the top. Look at the acuteness of the angle of his right leg he needed in order to resist the forces. Hogan said tension was the key to the downswing making it almost automatic.
@tm22721 Hogan's Shoulder center is very stable as he rotated them with tilt. He moved the hip center off the ball as he turned them and the rt leg extended to almost striaght this allowed the shoulder to turn more and stay in same spot over the ball. He also pushed the hip center thru and past the shoulder center on down swinSome said he almost looked rev pivot at the top, there was nothing rev about it because he ison Lt side. I have a 14 page letter Hogan wrote discribing all of this
Sevam's Move ("screwing the ball of the rear foot into the ground") bears a connotation of a conscious move.
The SPC concept of mine utilizes finding natural limitations in the joints at address. It means that the preset is much stronger at setup so that the overtorque in the joint is being created. All conscious thoughts are during setup, no conscious thoughts needed during the motion.
J, my concept is the SPC (Sagittal Plane Compression), not SBC :)
There is a difference. Mine was always presetting the knee at address till finding the rotational limitation in the ankle/knee joints. Sevam's original was "screwing the foot"; he started to mention about "pretorquing" later - and when we both discussed it, he said he meant slight pretorquing only, certainly not till the limit as per the SPC.
There is a subtle but important difference between the BGS and Sevam's theories - Sevam's Move is conscious and require transferring too much weight to the rear side.OTOH, my theory there is no place for conscious moves through the motion. All of them are being used at set-up. The rest is unconscious automatism.
A firm rear side is key to developing that kind of tension at the top. Look at the acuteness of the angle of his right leg he needed in order to resist the forces. Hogan said tension was the key to the downswing making it almost automatic.
tm22721 2 years ago 7
Very well said, mate.
h1e2x3 2 years ago
@tm22721 Hogan's Shoulder center is very stable as he rotated them with tilt. He moved the hip center off the ball as he turned them and the rt leg extended to almost striaght this allowed the shoulder to turn more and stay in same spot over the ball. He also pushed the hip center thru and past the shoulder center on down swinSome said he almost looked rev pivot at the top, there was nothing rev about it because he ison Lt side. I have a 14 page letter Hogan wrote discribing all of this
TheBillygolfs50 1 year ago
Comment removed
downtoscratch 2 years ago
Nothing is missed, J.
Sevam's Move ("screwing the ball of the rear foot into the ground") bears a connotation of a conscious move.
The SPC concept of mine utilizes finding natural limitations in the joints at address. It means that the preset is much stronger at setup so that the overtorque in the joint is being created. All conscious thoughts are during setup, no conscious thoughts needed during the motion.
h1e2x3 2 years ago
Comment removed
downtoscratch 2 years ago
J, my concept is the SPC (Sagittal Plane Compression), not SBC :)
There is a difference. Mine was always presetting the knee at address till finding the rotational limitation in the ankle/knee joints. Sevam's original was "screwing the foot"; he started to mention about "pretorquing" later - and when we both discussed it, he said he meant slight pretorquing only, certainly not till the limit as per the SPC.
h1e2x3 2 years ago
Another great example of Sevam1's "the secret is in the dirt" move. Thanks for sharing this great video!!!
finster869 2 years ago
There is a subtle but important difference between the BGS and Sevam's theories - Sevam's Move is conscious and require transferring too much weight to the rear side.OTOH, my theory there is no place for conscious moves through the motion. All of them are being used at set-up. The rest is unconscious automatism.
h1e2x3 2 years ago 4