will you put all this in terms of a black hole for me? just trying to understand which is radiative and which is magnetic....the fabric of space is flowing there....
@77GSlinger I haven't studied Russels work, but by a glance his diagrams seem to rep. the structure which emerges from black/white whole being radiative & magnetic (collapsing)....when i refer to blackholes I am speaking of vortexes occuring on quantum and macro scales which are the emergence/collapsing sights of creation. In a repetitive matrix they create space/time. How do you support the idea that black holes are quack. Academia only has part understanding of these universal mechanic-isms.
@crystalearth33 Because academic black holes have nothing to do with the black holes which Russell speaks of. They are two entirely differenet creatures and the quackademic version is provably false. Also there is no suck thang as a quantum scale since there is no such thing as fundamental qunatums of energy, any more than there are fundamental ether particles. Both of these absurd ideas are based on empirical reductionism which is also provably wrong. Black white holes are a Rodin myth as well!
@crystalearth33 I refer to quantum as tiny scale not as quantas of energy. I agree there is no such thing as that and that reductionism is a distraction to reality. Ill check out the link. Thanks.
will you put all this in terms of a black hole for me? just trying to understand which is radiative and which is magnetic....the fabric of space is flowing there....
crystalearth33 8 months ago
@crystalearth33 Black Holios are a quackademic myth and not part of the real Universe. I do not undersatnd the rest of your question.
77GSlinger 8 months ago
@77GSlinger I haven't studied Russels work, but by a glance his diagrams seem to rep. the structure which emerges from black/white whole being radiative & magnetic (collapsing)....when i refer to blackholes I am speaking of vortexes occuring on quantum and macro scales which are the emergence/collapsing sights of creation. In a repetitive matrix they create space/time. How do you support the idea that black holes are quack. Academia only has part understanding of these universal mechanic-isms.
crystalearth33 7 months ago
@crystalearth33 Because academic black holes have nothing to do with the black holes which Russell speaks of. They are two entirely differenet creatures and the quackademic version is provably false. Also there is no suck thang as a quantum scale since there is no such thing as fundamental qunatums of energy, any more than there are fundamental ether particles. Both of these absurd ideas are based on empirical reductionism which is also provably wrong. Black white holes are a Rodin myth as well!
77GSlinger 7 months ago 2
@crystalearth33 I refer to quantum as tiny scale not as quantas of energy. I agree there is no such thing as that and that reductionism is a distraction to reality. Ill check out the link. Thanks.
crystalearth33 7 months ago
this was cool...very nice....from whence did you read this...? Ahh...the universal one....
mattpresti 1 year ago
Comment removed
mattpresti 1 year ago
awesome.
Loveseekingmissile 2 years ago
Thank you for saying so!
77GSlinger 2 years ago
@77GSlinger you are aware that the definition of energy is "the ability to do work"..
energy doesnt exist physically,what people call energy is some variant of what we think is what we call "electricity"...
bobo007xx 11 months ago
keep them xcoming fits
rodin to a t guy b
zz
guyzzemf 2 years ago
Great series! 5*****
morningmayan 2 years ago
Thanks LInda. Blessings!
77GSlinger 2 years ago
@77GSlinger great job thank friend*****.
TheLovesoul1 1 year ago