So you have data, I have data, I think the point here is, anything can be "the fastest" it all depends on how much money one has to throw at it, and records are always broken, there are 10 cars now faster than the Veyron which was once the fastest car in the world and a Hayabusa Turbo would smoke even them, bikes get my vote :)
@GrandTrunkWestern85 Another point to make mate is the 04 cars were the fastest but that was 8 'YEARS' ago, while terminal speed greater handling not as good as todays cars so ultimately slower lap times, MotoGP bikes just gone up to 1000cc again this year so look for a new speed record in 2012 ;) Todays MotoGP smokes todays F1, and that my friend is the ugly truth ;)
@GrandTrunkWestern85 whats wrong with getting data from google ? I take it you think thats a unreliable source? lmao ....no I aint a fan of F1 at all, I find it boring and a precession Zzzz
@MrMattPike Theoretically still not possible since the power to weight ratio from a F1 car still higher than that of a MotoGP bike. So on paper the car is faster than the bike it's all up to the driver who wins... But I would still love to see a bike win over a F1 car anyday. :)
@MrMattPike Theoretically still not possible since the power to weight ratio from a F1 car still higher than that of a MotoGP bike. So on paper the car is faster than the bike it's all up to the driver who wins... But I would still love to see a bike win over a F1 car anyday. :)
Theoretically still not possible since the power to weight ratio from a F1 car still higher than that of a MotoGP bike. So on paper the car is faster than the bike it's all up to the driver who wins... But I would still love to see a bike win over a F1 car anyday. :)
who cares what a formula one car can do ? are you ever going to own one? on real roads in the real world bikes will always win .only one car that would worry a bike and thats the bugatti veyron but how many of those do you see? i love cruising past cars when they are stuck in traffic jams,i love just riding my bike at any speed! its something you just cant experience in a car. bikes rool the roads.
Obvious what the outcome would be..car has downforce to help as well as four wheels etc.. takes balls to go that fast but takes bigger balls on the bike. Plus its more of a rush on a bike :)
an F1 car is the ultimate car. I'm sorry, but there is no way the Motogp bike is gonna beat it. Those things are more dangerous to drive slow than fast because they get their grip from down force. While I'm certain the bike is one hell of a ride and takes a ton of skill, the F1 is the ultimate machine. They are the fighter plane of ground vehicles.
@AStealA8 Yes it's the ultimate car... A motogp bike is not a car it's a bike!
A car will be better braking and cornering because it has 4 tyres, and the they all have a bigger contact patch due the fact the bike leans and only has about a coins width in contact with the tarmac!
If you consider it like that you realise just how amazing those motogp bikes are.
I love them both but MotoGp is a lot more fun to watch IMO. A bike takes as much skill as the car.
@AStealA8 Probably moreso when you think you have to manage the tyres, brake, accelerate and turn like you do in a car but with having to throw your weight all over the bike to get the best out of it. The penalties for getting it wrong are usually more severe!
No dis-respect to F1, I just don't think you can compare them.
@ceirwan Oh I would agree that the MotoGP bike takes an incredible amount of skill to ride. I'm just saying that there is no way that the bike would stand a chance in a race. Their horse power to weight ratio is very similar when you actually think about it, but like you said, the car has more grip to utilize that power. I agree both are very exciting sports though.
@AStealA8 It's not even that, the problem is the bike cannot keep the front wheel down. It's got so much power, it just cannot plant it. The Car can (two driving wheels). Whats more, when it comes to cornering, the car will destroy the bike - 4 wheels, against two, AND two fat wings pressing the rubber into the ground. There is no contest. I'm all about the bikes tho :D
moto gp bike is quicker in a straight line often over 200mph on the straights, F1 are normally about 190ish but the bike will never brake or corner as fast as a car
Fact. A moto gp are whatever bike can't beat an F1. F1 has both the advantage of braking and cornering speed. Though F1 has limited top speed, a bike would wheelie out of control if you'd ever think of adding turboes onto it. Just because some retard who beat supercars in his busa, it does not mean that he can take on and beat the ultimate car.
@Destronus Well, you can shut it when you get to know a turbo busa does 278mph in a standing mile and a F1 can never do that. Let me spell that out for you. NEVER.
Yes, it's all about the braking and the downforce for the car - its main advantages. An F1 car could probably drive upside down at 80 mph due to the downforce its wings generate. Take them off, and the traction control, and it would be pretty useless.
The only thing videos like this are good for is deviding opinion as far as I'm concerned . I prefer bikes myself but realise cars will always out-brake or corner bikes while bikes will probably out accelerate cars point is though some tracks favour acceleration while others are better suited to cornering / braking so you can fix the outcome over a lap by choice of track in theory what it all boils down to imo is which do you prefer cars or bikes ? and sticking to what you like otherwise it just
@christosswc Sorry I dont agree look at the video again the bike was out-accelerating the car until they had to brake so yes given enough long straights like Silverstone (UK track) used to have and I reckon the bike would shade it but not by much . I'm not going to argue about this as you have your opinion and I have mine and its quite clear to me we wont ever agree also the biggest problem is to the best of my knowledge no one has ever bothered to measure all-out acceleration on
@christosswc you seem to have a reading deficiency :) billboy1616 was talking about general cars vs bikes, and said "bikes will *probably* out accelerate cars"; you have to spend *huge* amounts of money on a car to get competitive in accel with a bike.
@billboy1616 The other plus is you can get a 1000cc super bike on the road or on a track where as no one is allowed to drive a current F1 car unless you have stacks of money.
@billboy1616 i see your theory but, it will never work like that. The problem is acceleration still needs a good contact patch to prevent wheelspin and with that in mind you never have to fight the front end rising on you in a car so you can be full throttle as soon as the grip allows. In any circuit speed or corner dominant, the bike has lost. I love cars myself but any bike racer has balls of steel and far more of that racer respect because they really do trust their lives with each other.
Even though the tyres aren't race-warm, vehicles not set up, they're not truly "racing" as such, and Pedrosa had no sort of line, the real difference between them can still be seen into that bend at the end of the straight - F1 car GONE...
Very little difference in acceleration though, and Button got the power on a fraction earlier from what I could hear, or at least into the power band.
Ok to end the debate! F1 car would have more top end speed if not for it's wings, moto gp bike and f1 car are about the same until they reach high speed then the F1 car becomes insanely heave due to down force making the gp bike eventually faster toward the latter part of straits. This video only shows the part where they are the same until the bike must slow for the bend. What I have said here comes from hard data from telemetry.
@valentino21979 Yep, plus 2 massive wings on either end pushing it down into the road. Plus 520 more horsepower etc. Haha, regardless, it's still a pretty awesome thing to watch. IMO f1 is better though. It just has that little extra something which I can't quite put my finger on, which moto GP just doesn't quite have for me. Love both though.
Even in its neutered state Webber's pole time at the Nurburgring was 20 seconds faster than Stoner's on the Honda. Wish they'd stop trying to find ways to slow the cars down and just let them rip. Then you'd be seeing top end speeds of 230 mph on long straights like Monza and Spa
I prefer F1 alot more. I find it more exciting and I've always been interested in the engines they use, the rule stuff and all sorts. I have watched the MotoGP too though on some occasions and it's crap... only joking it's good too, it's fun to watch from time to time. i just prefer F1.
MotoGP Bikes are slower than the V8 F1 cars in every way except top speed, MotoGP bikes (F1 bikes) can do 217mph, F1 never go more than 210mph nowadays
@anastasia60559 No, it has no rear wing which means it has no rear downforce meaning it can go waaaaay faster in a straight line, it's no longer a F1 car when the rear wing is taken off
uneducated comments by some again.An F1 car is faster around a track than a MotoGP bike of course,it has serious downforce for one.A MotoGP bike will out accelerate an F1 car,its very close but thats it.A car can outbrake the bike too.All very obvious.MotoGP boring?well its not been as exciting over the last few years,thats why i prefer Superbike racing to be honest.
Unless you’re talking of having a race from rolling a 100mph start the F1 car will always win because the bike chassis is primarily setup for handling and therefore has a short wheelbase and can't get the power down without the front wheel coming up. Or else it would look like a drag bike.
F1 will always be boring in comparison with Moto GP because overtaking is what makes an exciting race and it’s simply impossible for a car to do this as easily as a bike. Speed and power are irrelevant.
What difference does it make if one form of competition is faster than another form of competition. It doesn't make it less exciting just because the speed is slower.
Swimmng is slower than racing cars yet we all get excited when our country is winning a race at the Olympics. Same thing goes for running or yachting. When the America's cup yacht s are racing most people are glued to their TV sets yet they cancel the race if the wind exceeds 20 knots, about 22 mph. I love both F1 & MotoGP
the motorbike will be faster on straight line due to its better power/weight ratio, but on curves there's no story, the car will be MUCH faster, due to four wheels.
Stats on the video at 0.40 states that the power ratio favours the F! car 1.13 bhp/kg for F1 vs 1.02/ kg for bike
Depending on circuits bikes are sometimes faster on straights but not always - due to lower drag as downforce aerodynamics on the cars creates huge drag
Bikes corner slower due 2 leaning which reduces traction with only 1/4 of the tyre on the road. Excess power = massive wheelspin
Agree it's senseless to favour competitive sport based on speed differences
Man! i love both i like motogp more! A F1 is like the motorcycle of cars and of course its faster. aerodynamically faster with a bigger motor and shit of course its gonna smoke motogp.. but for the bike to keep up and was actually ahead at some point is amazing enough! love MotoGP!
So much more to think about with a bike than a car, a bike has so many more factors for the rider to deal with than a car driver has to deal with, sure the f1 drivers are dealing with alot of forces but they dont have to worry about lean angle or the million things that can upset a bike, what is an annoying small misstake for a car driver is a major crash for a bike, the formula 1 driver can focus alot more on his lines and his racing.
okay, a F1 can keep up with an 800cc GP bike, but what about the change for the 2012 season that changes the engine size from 800cc to 1000cc. That's going to add 30+ hp to a bike that will weigh within 10lbs of the 800cc bikes. I think the new liter GP bikes will destroy the F1 in acceleration once the 2012 season starts.
@almst1 Power isn't a major factor in performance its traction. More power increases rear wheel spin off the line & in corners. F1 car has 2 wheels to put power onto the ground which is a major advantage. The bike loses traction when its cornering because a leaning bike only has 1/4 its tread on the track which reduces traction thus cornering speed. In straight line speed Moto GP are sometimes faster than F1 on the straights because F! has drag induced downforce but Moto GP is slower overall..
@bobcooper31 thats why i said the new GP bikes will win acceleration, but thats about it. They should do a 1/4 mile drag and see who wins, it would definitely draw a crowd and be interesting.
imnotftw. I dont compare the two, 1 has 2 wheels, 230bhp and tries too kill you. other is a go kart parade basicly. Who cares tha bikes do nearly everything better than a car. i just find it funny wen people who cant even park there corsa decide that bikes are for pussies and are easy. Lets just remember that only a motorcyclist has won F1 and bike gp world championships. i would love too see F1 drivers vs motogp riders in head to head in equall cars AND bikes. I bet the bike lads will win. lol
oh and the zonda what £300 000 my old bike £1300 yamaha and all that cash got wat 10m down road. a thou bike would have eaten it. The car is star in F1 the riders are stars on the bikes. oh and £40 000 gets you a road goen moto gp bike, good luck getting any thing near a F1 car... ever. bike racers need more balls after all there closer to death than a f1 driver. go kart racing is more exiting.
@Quinney84 f1 is exciting jeez. there are both great to watch sure it takes more balls to ride a bike but it still takes balls to drive and f1 car like they do. You see them drive in places like singapore and Monaco and you wonder how they don't spin or crash on every corner. MotoGP and F1 both take extreme talent to drive in and both are very demanding and can be very dangerous and entertaining. Stop comparing them so much as they are at entirely different ends of the spectrum of motor racing.
Murry Walker said it all... Bike racing is the most exiting form of motorsport bar NON. you gonna argue with that bike and F1 legend? didnt think so! bikes for speed car for shopping! peace oh and let me know wat the back of my bike looks like as thats all car drivers ever see (exept the Zonda).
Lol, Formula 1 is for pussies? You would all piss your pants if you drove a formula one car. The skill and courage needed to get the full potential out of these cars is almost supernatural. Also, almost all motorsports have lowered power restrictions since the late 80's/early 90's. Turbo F1 cars dynoed up to 1500hp, almost twice the power of current formula one cars.
The bikes lose out to the cars on cornering as its impossible to get the power down onto the ground through the small contact area between tyre and ground caused by the leaning of the bike. You'd only have 1/4 of the tyre on the road on slow corners. On the straights of some circuits the bikes are as fast as the cars as they have no downforce drag.
I like & follow F! but I consider the bikes are more exciting as you can't pick a winner 2 laps from the end if the riders are in relatively close company, The continual swapping of places on the bikes is what F! is trying to achieve with DRS.
Moto GP offers more risk, which adds to a FAR superior race, plus the F1 cars are so closely matched its impossible to overtake unless someone actually makes an in-race mistake, added to this, the power-weight ratio of a GP bike is FAR greater than that of the F1 car, only reason 0-62 is achieved faster in F1 is...
A. Computer power, ECU, STM, TCS etc blah blah
and B the bike NEEDS Anti-wheelie control, which cuts the power in order to keep the bike on 2 wheels.... Bikes RULE, F1 is 4 pussies
Stupped comparasion.F1 is harder to drive than any bike.Mutch more G force than on the racing bike for example and mutch more speed in corners.And you are boring with balls,skill for driving bike,comon man ewery full drive bike,it is not F16,WRC---10 000 times more balls and skill than any bikers.Thats for real mans if you want to talk about balls,skil and hard driving.
you'll never have enough money for a car that does 0-100km/h in 3 seconds but is easy to have a bike that does that record. apart from that, you have to see videos with cars (not f1) against bikes. e.g. ferrari scuderia vs ducati demoncedici.. bikes almost always win.. bikes you can buy are much faster than cars you can..
you just gotta love honda...sure they haven't dominated much or made anything extremely exciting in recent years, but through the past 50 years they've made some of the best bikes, some of the best F1 engines & a supercar that even scared ferrari.
na u cant doubt that a f1 car is faster around a circuit. But , i love MotoGP because its so much more Raw racing. For example, what makes F1 so fast: aerodamics? the grip they have? the ability to exploit downforce? ...well, MotoGP doesnt have any of this and this makes the Racing that much better to watch, so really, i dont really care about how fast they go, they both go pretty fast and both are fucking loud. motogp is just 10 times better to watch, and where can i see an f1 car do a wheelie?
@popace erm you know nothing about f1 mate motogp is way more better to wactch 1 can an f1 car do a weelie no! 2 can a f1 go faster in starit line no! 3 are f1 cars boring YES! bikes are just more fun
@popace i coulnt give a shit about how fuck fast they go gp bike are well more fun and exciting to watch look at the races 2009 barcelona lorenzo vs rossi one of the best races ever f1 sucks its the most boring motorsport in the world its crap and am sorry my friend but your facts are wrong f1 cars are not faster let me give u some tips OK! the shanghi straight this year f1 car did 190mph that is well not fast motogp bike does 215mph down there and even the fastest f1 car ever did 206mph paah!!
and how do u define word faster? I say that something is faster if it completes the track faster then something else. And yes, the motogp bike has close accelerations to F1 but then when corner comes they have to brake hard, and that's where the F1 pulls miles ahead.
I say that motogp is boring to the ground for sure, while F1 is very interesting. But that's irrelevant cos it's my personal opinion. Therefore i don't give a fuck what you think about F1 or motogp - ok?
@popace yess cars can go faster round corners have u only just found that out gp bikes faster in strait line but f1 better on corners GOD! get over it there faster and that is an end of it OK! look i dont want to get in to a row its just my opinion and your opinion is that u think f1 is better ok i do k i do like f1 very much mate but i dont like it compared to motogp and u like f1 just my opinion mate :)
No, they're not faster even in straight line. They're neck to neck. Overall, F1 is a much much much faster machine then motogp will ever be. Period.
Now stop crying about F1 being boring as hell. MotoGP will never beat the record lap times set by Ferrari F1 2004 nor can they get even close to modern F1 cars. It's a remarkable machine motogp is, but not at F1 performance level.
Go look up for other videos F1 vs. motogp if you need satisfaction.
@popace no shit ofcorse f1 is faster with 2 extra tyres and downforce but if u were to make a track realy short then even a supermoto would pwn the f1 car. not sayin anything bad about the f1 car but dont say that moto gp bikes are not on the same performance level :S it just depends on the track cause on the dragstrip there are numberous of vehicles that can outperform the f1 car so they would be muchmuchmuch faster machines aswell right? so then dragsters are @ highest perf level by ur logic
no they are not on the f1 performance level. If they would be their track times would be neck to neck. And we all now, they're not. Yes, Motogp is a high performance motoclass, I wont deny that. But it's not at the F1s perf level.
And no, forget about anything pwning F1 on a short track cos it wouldn't. Even the tires alone at the F1 without traction at all, can pull over 2 Gs in the corner. That's twice as much as the best supercars on the earth.
@davidrunnenburg erm....no just no. What sets f1 cars apart from any other motorsport on the planet is their ability to corner at high speeds. To be honest, the only reason motogp loses to f1 IS because of corners...
@CdrJamesCool thats coz people like and so have gp fans theres loads there was acctully more motogp fan at catalunya gp than there was when the f1 was there O_o
@CdrJamesCool and plus its more intresting coz bikes r soo small and they r incredibly fragile and so r f1 cars but bikes can go faster (in strait line) and the engine is only a 800cc thats less than a liter next year there goin back to the big monsters 1000cc then f1 car will be left for dead on the strait dont stand a chance and i think its stupid f1 coz it seems they are making it worse they have taken the fuel system away now thats got to be boring and 2 the amount of laps 70laps TO MANY!!
@lukezapper Actually, there is a video where an F1 car goes 256 mph, faster than the bugatti. Look for the video here on youtube by typing "formula 1 256 mph."
@anastasia60559 its cheatin though coz if u take the wing off it goes like well fast because of the flow over the car so it does not count as a speed record mate yeh it is very very very fast but in a GP u dont see them with out wings :/ coz they need to go round corners :) but f1 cars today like 2011 are slower than old f1 cars arnt they coz the fastest ive seen them go this year is 339kph and that is slower coz i remeber they could do 220mph (362kph) in 2005 shame they got rid of v10s bastard
@lukezapper i only bothered to read the fact you think f1 cars will go faster without aerodynamics.. f1 cars make fuckall mechanical grip (compared to requirements of putting down the power), they are tuned for aerodynamic grip with minimum drag. Take the wing off an f1 car that weights almost nothing and the fucker will spin its wheels in the high gears. Plus the front wing reduces drag by flowing air over the cars more evenly whilst also making grip. yeah mate it is a shame about the v10's aye
@fergus1494 yeeh anyway i like both of them great motorsports but i will admit f1 is the bench mark in saftey and i think motorsports learnt i lesson this week as motogp lost a great Simioncelli and not forgetting dan weldon 2 great talent people lost but i have to be honest indy car is way not safe the speed they go 235mph and its saftey is crap am sorry but motorsports need to keep up to date otherwise it will be to safe and the engines and cars will be so small to make it safer :/
@anastasia60559 i still carnt belive how fast Top Fuel Dragsters go in NHRA FUCKIN HELL! fastest speed is over 340 to 350mph :O and it will do 0-112mph in 0.800 of a second! and a qutar of a mile in 3.7 seconds
0:07, love the sound of sudden acceleration
JtotheROC 3 weeks ago
No se puede comparar un F1 con una moto por tocha que sea....
adrimdrd 1 month ago
Fastest ever F1 top speed was 215mph, last year Dani Pedrosa managed 217mph, bikes rule :)
MrMattPike 1 month ago
@MrMattPike Really? Because Williams BMW recorded a top speed of 369.9 km/h (229.8 mph) at Monza back in 04.
GrandTrunkWestern85 1 month ago
@GrandTrunkWestern85 Here ya go sunshine :) type into Google :
"MotoGP: Pedrosa 217mph: faster than F1"
and it should be the first link.
So you have data, I have data, I think the point here is, anything can be "the fastest" it all depends on how much money one has to throw at it, and records are always broken, there are 10 cars now faster than the Veyron which was once the fastest car in the world and a Hayabusa Turbo would smoke even them, bikes get my vote :)
MrMattPike 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrMattPike I'm not quite sure what your on about. My reply was to your "Fastest ever F1 top speed was 215mph" nonsense.
GrandTrunkWestern85 1 month ago
@GrandTrunkWestern85 Another point to make mate is the 04 cars were the fastest but that was 8 'YEARS' ago, while terminal speed greater handling not as good as todays cars so ultimately slower lap times, MotoGP bikes just gone up to 1000cc again this year so look for a new speed record in 2012 ;) Todays MotoGP smokes todays F1, and that my friend is the ugly truth ;)
MrMattPike 1 month ago
@MrMattPike Google is where you went, to get your technical, and telemetry data? You must be a real fan.
GrandTrunkWestern85 1 month ago
@GrandTrunkWestern85 whats wrong with getting data from google ? I take it you think thats a unreliable source? lmao ....no I aint a fan of F1 at all, I find it boring and a precession Zzzz
MrMattPike 1 month ago
@MrMattPike Theoretically still not possible since the power to weight ratio from a F1 car still higher than that of a MotoGP bike. So on paper the car is faster than the bike it's all up to the driver who wins... But I would still love to see a bike win over a F1 car anyday. :)
Xiphros 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrMattPike Theoretically still not possible since the power to weight ratio from a F1 car still higher than that of a MotoGP bike. So on paper the car is faster than the bike it's all up to the driver who wins... But I would still love to see a bike win over a F1 car anyday. :)
Xiphros 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrMattPike
Theoretically still not possible since the power to weight ratio from a F1 car still higher than that of a MotoGP bike. So on paper the car is faster than the bike it's all up to the driver who wins... But I would still love to see a bike win over a F1 car anyday. :)
Xiphros 1 week ago
@MrMattPike beaten by a road car lol veyron?
stellpoons 1 month ago
The motogp bike has faster acceleration, the car is setup for corning the bike has no downforce whatsoever.
To make it fair you need a very long straight but then the F1 car could run with little downforce which would give the car back the advantage.
If you kept the car the same in a straight line the motogp bike would be winning then get Usain Bolted after about 200m.
an4rew 1 month ago
who cares what a formula one car can do ? are you ever going to own one? on real roads in the real world bikes will always win .only one car that would worry a bike and thats the bugatti veyron but how many of those do you see? i love cruising past cars when they are stuck in traffic jams,i love just riding my bike at any speed! its something you just cant experience in a car. bikes rool the roads.
billy1858 1 month ago
Plus you cant wheelie a car!
woodybenjam 1 month ago
@woodybenjam you've clearly never been to a car wheelie event at a dragstrip...
mikeyisace07 1 month ago
always going to be the car but which is more fun? 100* the bike.
smilo996 1 month ago
f1 is technical masterpiece, its built only for one thing.
miksulder 1 month ago
Obvious what the outcome would be..car has downforce to help as well as four wheels etc.. takes balls to go that fast but takes bigger balls on the bike. Plus its more of a rush on a bike :)
bluewinegum 1 month ago
F1 > all
NottinghamForest22 1 month ago
@stuartymch its the best sound in the world, for those as me, that know how to appreciate it
DeathNightmares 2 months ago
@DeathNightmares "F1 is the best sound in the world ..."
I like F1 a lot, though the best sound in the world is Top Fuel drag cars. Nothing else land based compares to the fury they unleash.
metal666micky 1 month ago
looks like the track was wet not good for a bike
dracornz 2 months ago
Whow to the cornering of the F1! O_O
Grandmasterduke 2 months ago
i hate the sound of formula 1 cars it makes me sick
stuartymch 2 months ago
@stuartymch The sound of your Volvo is better i guess
kluxxl1 2 months ago
an F1 car is the ultimate car. I'm sorry, but there is no way the Motogp bike is gonna beat it. Those things are more dangerous to drive slow than fast because they get their grip from down force. While I'm certain the bike is one hell of a ride and takes a ton of skill, the F1 is the ultimate machine. They are the fighter plane of ground vehicles.
AStealA8 2 months ago
@AStealA8 Yes it's the ultimate car... A motogp bike is not a car it's a bike!
A car will be better braking and cornering because it has 4 tyres, and the they all have a bigger contact patch due the fact the bike leans and only has about a coins width in contact with the tarmac!
If you consider it like that you realise just how amazing those motogp bikes are.
I love them both but MotoGp is a lot more fun to watch IMO. A bike takes as much skill as the car.
ceirwan 2 months ago
@AStealA8 Probably moreso when you think you have to manage the tyres, brake, accelerate and turn like you do in a car but with having to throw your weight all over the bike to get the best out of it. The penalties for getting it wrong are usually more severe!
No dis-respect to F1, I just don't think you can compare them.
ceirwan 2 months ago
@ceirwan Oh I would agree that the MotoGP bike takes an incredible amount of skill to ride. I'm just saying that there is no way that the bike would stand a chance in a race. Their horse power to weight ratio is very similar when you actually think about it, but like you said, the car has more grip to utilize that power. I agree both are very exciting sports though.
AStealA8 2 months ago 2
@AStealA8 It's not even that, the problem is the bike cannot keep the front wheel down. It's got so much power, it just cannot plant it. The Car can (two driving wheels). Whats more, when it comes to cornering, the car will destroy the bike - 4 wheels, against two, AND two fat wings pressing the rubber into the ground. There is no contest. I'm all about the bikes tho :D
pant1979 2 months ago 2
moto gp bike is quicker in a straight line often over 200mph on the straights, F1 are normally about 190ish but the bike will never brake or corner as fast as a car
2012dibble 3 months ago
no bike is fast that f1 car, the milions that car cost. the f1 is like the space ship in the graund ok... . but good video
lisandro364 3 months ago
Fact. A moto gp are whatever bike can't beat an F1. F1 has both the advantage of braking and cornering speed. Though F1 has limited top speed, a bike would wheelie out of control if you'd ever think of adding turboes onto it. Just because some retard who beat supercars in his busa, it does not mean that he can take on and beat the ultimate car.
Destronus 3 months ago
Comment removed
TurboNosHayabusa1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Destronus Well, you can shut it when you get to know a turbo busa does 278mph in a standing mile and a F1 can never do that. Let me spell that out for you. NEVER.
TurboNosHayabusa1 1 month ago
smoll dani
chinporori 3 months ago
F1 F1 F1 !!!!
DEVASTATOR478 3 months ago
Yes, it's all about the braking and the downforce for the car - its main advantages. An F1 car could probably drive upside down at 80 mph due to the downforce its wings generate. Take them off, and the traction control, and it would be pretty useless.
bladeboy2041 3 months ago
only thing that honda ever won!
slimchristoff 4 months ago 30
@slimchristoff Only thing? Remember Senna in the McLaren Honda!
Harlekein 4 months ago
@Harlekein only thing THAT honda (earth car) ever won
slimchristoff 3 months ago
@Harlekein he meant only thing , that honda ever won . as in that model
lloydieb123 3 months ago
@slimchristoff sad dat you don't watch motoGP..
nitrogod1991 3 months ago 2
@slimchristoff apart from *everything* on two wheels
pant1979 2 months ago
The only thing videos like this are good for is deviding opinion as far as I'm concerned . I prefer bikes myself but realise cars will always out-brake or corner bikes while bikes will probably out accelerate cars point is though some tracks favour acceleration while others are better suited to cornering / braking so you can fix the outcome over a lap by choice of track in theory what it all boils down to imo is which do you prefer cars or bikes ? and sticking to what you like otherwise it just
billboy1616 4 months ago 20
@billboy1616 ends in silly arguments like this that no one wins and makes the main protaganist look stupid
billboy1616 4 months ago
@billboy1616 You can't fix the outcome by choice of track neither in theory nor in practice.
F1 will be quicker on any track in the world even if it run in the rain and it's opponent set it's times in the dry.
It's that big a difference.
This video showcases what some people cannot quite fathom.
What it means to pull up to 5 gs in a corner or on the brakes.
And have more power than weight to boot.
My kart corners at 2.2 g and I can't breathe.
They are an exercise in human, not mechanical limits.
christosswc 1 month ago
@christosswc Sorry I dont agree look at the video again the bike was out-accelerating the car until they had to brake so yes given enough long straights like Silverstone (UK track) used to have and I reckon the bike would shade it but not by much . I'm not going to argue about this as you have your opinion and I have mine and its quite clear to me we wont ever agree also the biggest problem is to the best of my knowledge no one has ever bothered to measure all-out acceleration on
billboy1616 1 month ago
@billboy1616 either so without the cold hard data its always going to be very subjective and a matter of personal opinion so really whats the point ?
billboy1616 1 month ago
@billboy1616 The bike out accelerating the car is not in this video.
The opposite is.
They are a different discipline but the F1 car is just MILES ahead in terms of lap time regardless of circumstance.
You seem unable to accept that.
Bikes are great but lap times are not what they are good for.
Even a twin cylinder 250cc Superkart can match them for laptime on most tracks and it costs as much as your family car.
Let it rest.
christosswc 1 month ago
@christosswc you seem to have a reading deficiency :) billboy1616 was talking about general cars vs bikes, and said "bikes will *probably* out accelerate cars"; you have to spend *huge* amounts of money on a car to get competitive in accel with a bike.
barrkel 1 month ago
@billboy1616 The other plus is you can get a 1000cc super bike on the road or on a track where as no one is allowed to drive a current F1 car unless you have stacks of money.
exotic444 1 month ago
@billboy1616 i see your theory but, it will never work like that. The problem is acceleration still needs a good contact patch to prevent wheelspin and with that in mind you never have to fight the front end rising on you in a car so you can be full throttle as soon as the grip allows. In any circuit speed or corner dominant, the bike has lost. I love cars myself but any bike racer has balls of steel and far more of that racer respect because they really do trust their lives with each other.
stellpoons 1 month ago
very nice
wen290585401 4 months ago
theres one problem...
f1 got 2 wheels too much....
TIIIMMMMEEEEYYY 4 months ago
@TIIIMMMMEEEEYYY yep and its faster because of it
LadySpy120 4 months ago
Even though the tyres aren't race-warm, vehicles not set up, they're not truly "racing" as such, and Pedrosa had no sort of line, the real difference between them can still be seen into that bend at the end of the straight - F1 car GONE...
Very little difference in acceleration though, and Button got the power on a fraction earlier from what I could hear, or at least into the power band.
CodeTwo2 5 months ago
Ok to end the debate! F1 car would have more top end speed if not for it's wings, moto gp bike and f1 car are about the same until they reach high speed then the F1 car becomes insanely heave due to down force making the gp bike eventually faster toward the latter part of straits. This video only shows the part where they are the same until the bike must slow for the bend. What I have said here comes from hard data from telemetry.
galaxything 5 months ago in playlist f1 cars vs bikes
moto gp much better to watch (theres over taking)
staggysgasgas 5 months ago
@staggysgasgas Try telling that to everyone not on a Honda and named Stoner.
cocorocks88 5 months ago
to all you f1 fans try watching the motogp 600s last week ( a proper race )
staggysgasgas 5 months ago
@staggysgasgas where do u watch these races?
shinobi1203 5 months ago
to all you f1 fans try watching the moto gp 600s last week ( a proper race )
staggysgasgas 5 months ago
copy cat -youtu.be-rtQvaCgWpfA
HD467XB36 5 months ago
copy cat
HD467XB36 5 months ago
Takes more balls to ride a gp bike.
vinto34 5 months ago
Did anyone notice that it was wet? Respect for the Bike to only loose 6 secs on the F1 car
HarlekinGer 5 months ago
Are these Hondas ?
PupuTheClown 5 months ago
@PupuTheClown Yes. 2008 honda f1 car and 2008 honda moto gp bike I believe.
jamiroquai01fan 5 months ago
olloollolloolol
fruitxgoodfruitxgood 5 months ago
olloollol
fruitxgoodfruitxgood 5 months ago
with 4 fat tires gathering grip and 10 times more rubber touching the track, u could say its plain old logic that the car laps faster.
valentino21979 5 months ago
@valentino21979 Yep, plus 2 massive wings on either end pushing it down into the road. Plus 520 more horsepower etc. Haha, regardless, it's still a pretty awesome thing to watch. IMO f1 is better though. It just has that little extra something which I can't quite put my finger on, which moto GP just doesn't quite have for me. Love both though.
jamiroquai01fan 5 months ago
Even in its neutered state Webber's pole time at the Nurburgring was 20 seconds faster than Stoner's on the Honda. Wish they'd stop trying to find ways to slow the cars down and just let them rip. Then you'd be seeing top end speeds of 230 mph on long straights like Monza and Spa
craigy977 5 months ago
there's no thrill watching f1 anymore
Meanochness 6 months ago
honestly who did you think would win?
iiDangerCloseBK 6 months ago
I prefer F1 alot more. I find it more exciting and I've always been interested in the engines they use, the rule stuff and all sorts. I have watched the MotoGP too though on some occasions and it's crap... only joking it's good too, it's fun to watch from time to time. i just prefer F1.
CdrJamesCool 6 months ago
MotoGP Bikes are slower than the V8 F1 cars in every way except top speed, MotoGP bikes (F1 bikes) can do 217mph, F1 never go more than 210mph nowadays
blondboyharrison 6 months ago
@blondboyharrison There is a video where an F1 goes about 256 mph. Look for the video "formula 1 256 mph."
anastasia60559 4 months ago
@anastasia60559 No, it has no rear wing which means it has no rear downforce meaning it can go waaaaay faster in a straight line, it's no longer a F1 car when the rear wing is taken off
blondboyharrison 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
f1 car 0-250km\h 7,1 sec
Hayabusa(270hp) 0-250km\h 8,9... so nothing can beat an F1....
Alex2010976 6 months ago
I love both and I wouldn't say that one is better than the other. It's just a matter of opinion.
chaparritz46 6 months ago
uneducated comments by some again.An F1 car is faster around a track than a MotoGP bike of course,it has serious downforce for one.A MotoGP bike will out accelerate an F1 car,its very close but thats it.A car can outbrake the bike too.All very obvious.MotoGP boring?well its not been as exciting over the last few years,thats why i prefer Superbike racing to be honest.
kwikkwak77 6 months ago
Bring back V10s to F1!!!
ioan182 6 months ago
Motogp bike would make you shit yourself more when you open the throttle :D
grandmasterj5 6 months ago
ANY ONE THAT THINKS F1 IS BETTER THAN MOTOGP SUCKS COCK!!
rebelwithoutaporsche 6 months ago
@rebelwithoutaporsche well, i don't think, i know;)
banzaiHonda92 6 months ago
Unless you’re talking of having a race from rolling a 100mph start the F1 car will always win because the bike chassis is primarily setup for handling and therefore has a short wheelbase and can't get the power down without the front wheel coming up. Or else it would look like a drag bike.
F1 will always be boring in comparison with Moto GP because overtaking is what makes an exciting race and it’s simply impossible for a car to do this as easily as a bike. Speed and power are irrelevant.
SandyDranfield 6 months ago
What difference does it make if one form of competition is faster than another form of competition. It doesn't make it less exciting just because the speed is slower.
Swimmng is slower than racing cars yet we all get excited when our country is winning a race at the Olympics. Same thing goes for running or yachting. When the America's cup yacht s are racing most people are glued to their TV sets yet they cancel the race if the wind exceeds 20 knots, about 22 mph. I love both F1 & MotoGP
bobcooper31 6 months ago
ovo what would win f1 car slightly faster on str8s but the bike has 2 wheels less than half the rubber on the track and no down force
trialsteam 6 months ago
f1 car can only be beaten by f1 car
wavefiat 6 months ago
It's senseless to compare cars and motorbikes.
the motorbike will be faster on straight line due to its better power/weight ratio, but on curves there's no story, the car will be MUCH faster, due to four wheels.
TheAXL35784 7 months ago
@TheAXL35784 as you can planly see the bike doesnt out accelerate the f1 car but good effort
offitcock 6 months ago
@TheAXL35784
Stats on the video at 0.40 states that the power ratio favours the F! car 1.13 bhp/kg for F1 vs 1.02/ kg for bike
Depending on circuits bikes are sometimes faster on straights but not always - due to lower drag as downforce aerodynamics on the cars creates huge drag
Bikes corner slower due 2 leaning which reduces traction with only 1/4 of the tyre on the road. Excess power = massive wheelspin
Agree it's senseless to favour competitive sport based on speed differences
bobcooper31 6 months ago
Man! i love both i like motogp more! A F1 is like the motorcycle of cars and of course its faster. aerodynamically faster with a bigger motor and shit of course its gonna smoke motogp.. but for the bike to keep up and was actually ahead at some point is amazing enough! love MotoGP!
GrimSkey 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Do you hear that sound and speed in corners,F1 is fucking thunderstorm for enything else,It takes way more nuts to hop in that than enything.
toniiii9 7 months ago
no bike can keep up with a equally power to weight ratio car. 4 wheels vs 2 wheels when cornering is no contest. 2 more wheels twice the grip.
petrol4d 7 months ago
que gancho tan chimba!!!
andrescarvajalh 7 months ago
So much more to think about with a bike than a car, a bike has so many more factors for the rider to deal with than a car driver has to deal with, sure the f1 drivers are dealing with alot of forces but they dont have to worry about lean angle or the million things that can upset a bike, what is an annoying small misstake for a car driver is a major crash for a bike, the formula 1 driver can focus alot more on his lines and his racing.
sargares18 7 months ago
okay, a F1 can keep up with an 800cc GP bike, but what about the change for the 2012 season that changes the engine size from 800cc to 1000cc. That's going to add 30+ hp to a bike that will weigh within 10lbs of the 800cc bikes. I think the new liter GP bikes will destroy the F1 in acceleration once the 2012 season starts.
almst1 7 months ago
@almst1 Power isn't a major factor in performance its traction. More power increases rear wheel spin off the line & in corners. F1 car has 2 wheels to put power onto the ground which is a major advantage. The bike loses traction when its cornering because a leaning bike only has 1/4 its tread on the track which reduces traction thus cornering speed. In straight line speed Moto GP are sometimes faster than F1 on the straights because F! has drag induced downforce but Moto GP is slower overall..
bobcooper31 6 months ago
@bobcooper31 thats why i said the new GP bikes will win acceleration, but thats about it. They should do a 1/4 mile drag and see who wins, it would definitely draw a crowd and be interesting.
almst1 6 months ago
Umiliation, F1 got a lot of Downforce. MotoGP got it? xD
RedhotIta1 7 months ago
imnotftw. I dont compare the two, 1 has 2 wheels, 230bhp and tries too kill you. other is a go kart parade basicly. Who cares tha bikes do nearly everything better than a car. i just find it funny wen people who cant even park there corsa decide that bikes are for pussies and are easy. Lets just remember that only a motorcyclist has won F1 and bike gp world championships. i would love too see F1 drivers vs motogp riders in head to head in equall cars AND bikes. I bet the bike lads will win. lol
Quinney84 7 months ago
he beats him only in the Turn
homoKaliptus 7 months ago
@homoKaliptus
Jenson have passing Dani BEFORE the turn!
Ale55andr082 7 months ago
It takes way more nuts to hop on a GP bike for sure.
guyfidelity 7 months ago
oh and the zonda what £300 000 my old bike £1300 yamaha and all that cash got wat 10m down road. a thou bike would have eaten it. The car is star in F1 the riders are stars on the bikes. oh and £40 000 gets you a road goen moto gp bike, good luck getting any thing near a F1 car... ever. bike racers need more balls after all there closer to death than a f1 driver. go kart racing is more exiting.
Quinney84 7 months ago
@Quinney84 f1 is exciting jeez. there are both great to watch sure it takes more balls to ride a bike but it still takes balls to drive and f1 car like they do. You see them drive in places like singapore and Monaco and you wonder how they don't spin or crash on every corner. MotoGP and F1 both take extreme talent to drive in and both are very demanding and can be very dangerous and entertaining. Stop comparing them so much as they are at entirely different ends of the spectrum of motor racing.
imnotftw18 7 months ago 20
Murry Walker said it all... Bike racing is the most exiting form of motorsport bar NON. you gonna argue with that bike and F1 legend? didnt think so! bikes for speed car for shopping! peace oh and let me know wat the back of my bike looks like as thats all car drivers ever see (exept the Zonda).
Quinney84 7 months ago
bet it would be a differant story against the old 990cc motogp bikes
bigbungi1965 7 months ago
Lol, Formula 1 is for pussies? You would all piss your pants if you drove a formula one car. The skill and courage needed to get the full potential out of these cars is almost supernatural. Also, almost all motorsports have lowered power restrictions since the late 80's/early 90's. Turbo F1 cars dynoed up to 1500hp, almost twice the power of current formula one cars.
biglarfspeed6 7 months ago 2
Bike 800cc, on 1000cc GP, different, i think, nothing to compare
cedosx 7 months ago
moto gp bikes all day cars r 4 pussies
TheCosworthrs 8 months ago
@TheCosworthrs lol moto gp is a joke compared to F1
facfom 8 months ago
@facfom the bike was in front for a good 5 seconds 0:05 + That acceleration is no joke :)
JoeJoeboii 7 months ago
just the sound of those 900HP on the f1 must be an intimidating for the motoGP
dungbeetleScat1 8 months ago
@dungbeetleScat1 sounds like an little elephant :DD
NeoTheOne2 8 months ago
no competition here.. only jet fighter in the air can beat F1 car
jasonfoe 8 months ago
that brawn car was insanely fast though. even for an f1 car.
imnotftw 8 months ago
@imnotftw that wasnt the brawn car
Dazzler59 8 months ago
The bikes lose out to the cars on cornering as its impossible to get the power down onto the ground through the small contact area between tyre and ground caused by the leaning of the bike. You'd only have 1/4 of the tyre on the road on slow corners. On the straights of some circuits the bikes are as fast as the cars as they have no downforce drag.
bobcooper31 8 months ago
I like & follow F! but I consider the bikes are more exciting as you can't pick a winner 2 laps from the end if the riders are in relatively close company, The continual swapping of places on the bikes is what F! is trying to achieve with DRS.
bobcooper31 8 months ago
Moto GP offers more risk, which adds to a FAR superior race, plus the F1 cars are so closely matched its impossible to overtake unless someone actually makes an in-race mistake, added to this, the power-weight ratio of a GP bike is FAR greater than that of the F1 car, only reason 0-62 is achieved faster in F1 is...
A. Computer power, ECU, STM, TCS etc blah blah
and B the bike NEEDS Anti-wheelie control, which cuts the power in order to keep the bike on 2 wheels.... Bikes RULE, F1 is 4 pussies
sugarpot21 8 months ago
@sugarpot21
agreed. real man go MotoGP, pussies go F1. jenson button approves.
TamanLinkin 8 months ago 2
do bikes have downforce? NO.
F1 cars will always own bikes round a track.
drplbiftin 8 months ago
tonniii9. 1 simple question for you. Ride a motorcycle then drive a car.... now tell me wat is harder.!
Quinney84 8 months ago
@Quinney84
Stupped comparasion.F1 is harder to drive than any bike.Mutch more G force than on the racing bike for example and mutch more speed in corners.And you are boring with balls,skill for driving bike,comon man ewery full drive bike,it is not F16,WRC---10 000 times more balls and skill than any bikers.Thats for real mans if you want to talk about balls,skil and hard driving.
toniiii9 7 months ago 2
@toniiii9 OK go look up isle of man TT
You done?
Apology accepted.
Antifaith29 7 months ago
straight-line speed = car.
cornering speed = car
acceleration = car (in this case)
most power = car
most torque = car
what would i choose ? without a doubt the bike
superjackhamm3 8 months ago
@superjackhamm3
you'll never have enough money for a car that does 0-100km/h in 3 seconds but is easy to have a bike that does that record. apart from that, you have to see videos with cars (not f1) against bikes. e.g. ferrari scuderia vs ducati demoncedici.. bikes almost always win.. bikes you can buy are much faster than cars you can..
xarhsbrak 8 months ago
@xarhsbrak
i know i have one ;)
superjackhamm3 8 months ago
Peole get confused cos a road bike is usualy faster than a road car. However when both are taken to their extremes the cars are always faster
DunxMeister 8 months ago
No I'm sorry, Straightline speed, Bike, Cornering, Car.
MarkCrompton94 8 months ago
you just gotta love honda...sure they haven't dominated much or made anything extremely exciting in recent years, but through the past 50 years they've made some of the best bikes, some of the best F1 engines & a supercar that even scared ferrari.
ShAwNeXsHeN 8 months ago
na u cant doubt that a f1 car is faster around a circuit. But , i love MotoGP because its so much more Raw racing. For example, what makes F1 so fast: aerodamics? the grip they have? the ability to exploit downforce? ...well, MotoGP doesnt have any of this and this makes the Racing that much better to watch, so really, i dont really care about how fast they go, they both go pretty fast and both are fucking loud. motogp is just 10 times better to watch, and where can i see an f1 car do a wheelie?
yoseb92 9 months ago in playlist Moto GP 35
@yoseb92 i find motorcycle racing fucking boring as hell!
TheFlyingPineapple 7 months ago
@yoseb92 You can watch one right here: /watch?v=T0VGYxwgtYk
HabaneroTck 7 months ago
@yoseb92 All of those thing are very advantageous for the F1 car, but another big advantage is the ability to brake later and harder into the turns.
Zir3ne 7 months ago
@yoseb92 You can see an F1 one do a wheelie when it touches another F1 car and gets sent airborne.
SuperBeastboy50 7 months ago 10
@SuperBeastboy50 u mean it does a mark webber?
itzrichardz 5 months ago
@SuperBeastboy50 ya just like mark webber did =[)
tdwtFULLEPISODES 4 months ago
@yoseb92 be cool if a f1 cR COULD do a weeelie ;)
TheClock36912 6 months ago
@yoseb92
chickenshit, F1 all over this place, motoGP is boring. 200hp two wheelers... Nothing but a 20k rpm screaming 800bhp F1 :)
popace 6 months ago
@popace erm you know nothing about f1 mate motogp is way more better to wactch 1 can an f1 car do a weelie no! 2 can a f1 go faster in starit line no! 3 are f1 cars boring YES! bikes are just more fun
lukezapper 6 months ago
@lukezapper 1 No it cannot..2 Yes it can go faster in straight line..3 No they are not boring.
I personally don't watch MotoGP regulary,just sometimes.But i fallow F1.But im no saying motoGP is boring.You are just a blind fanboy.
cybershotty 6 months ago
@lukezapper
And I don't know nothing about F1 just cos u think that motogp is more fun to watch? U sir are retarded, I'm very sorry to say that.
And yes, a F1 car goes faster in straight line than any motogp bike. Time around track is much much faster than motogp aswell.
popace 6 months ago
@popace i coulnt give a shit about how fuck fast they go gp bike are well more fun and exciting to watch look at the races 2009 barcelona lorenzo vs rossi one of the best races ever f1 sucks its the most boring motorsport in the world its crap and am sorry my friend but your facts are wrong f1 cars are not faster let me give u some tips OK! the shanghi straight this year f1 car did 190mph that is well not fast motogp bike does 215mph down there and even the fastest f1 car ever did 206mph paah!!
lukezapper 6 months ago
@lukezapper
and how do u define word faster? I say that something is faster if it completes the track faster then something else. And yes, the motogp bike has close accelerations to F1 but then when corner comes they have to brake hard, and that's where the F1 pulls miles ahead.
I say that motogp is boring to the ground for sure, while F1 is very interesting. But that's irrelevant cos it's my personal opinion. Therefore i don't give a fuck what you think about F1 or motogp - ok?
popace 6 months ago
@popace yess cars can go faster round corners have u only just found that out gp bikes faster in strait line but f1 better on corners GOD! get over it there faster and that is an end of it OK! look i dont want to get in to a row its just my opinion and your opinion is that u think f1 is better ok i do k i do like f1 very much mate but i dont like it compared to motogp and u like f1 just my opinion mate :)
lukezapper 6 months ago
@lukezapper
No, they're not faster even in straight line. They're neck to neck. Overall, F1 is a much much much faster machine then motogp will ever be. Period.
Now stop crying about F1 being boring as hell. MotoGP will never beat the record lap times set by Ferrari F1 2004 nor can they get even close to modern F1 cars. It's a remarkable machine motogp is, but not at F1 performance level.
Go look up for other videos F1 vs. motogp if you need satisfaction.
popace 6 months ago
@popace no shit ofcorse f1 is faster with 2 extra tyres and downforce but if u were to make a track realy short then even a supermoto would pwn the f1 car. not sayin anything bad about the f1 car but dont say that moto gp bikes are not on the same performance level :S it just depends on the track cause on the dragstrip there are numberous of vehicles that can outperform the f1 car so they would be muchmuchmuch faster machines aswell right? so then dragsters are @ highest perf level by ur logic
davidrunnenburg 6 months ago
@davidrunnenburg
no they are not on the f1 performance level. If they would be their track times would be neck to neck. And we all now, they're not. Yes, Motogp is a high performance motoclass, I wont deny that. But it's not at the F1s perf level.
And no, forget about anything pwning F1 on a short track cos it wouldn't. Even the tires alone at the F1 without traction at all, can pull over 2 Gs in the corner. That's twice as much as the best supercars on the earth.
supermoto pwning F1... lol
popace 6 months ago
@davidrunnenburg erm....no just no. What sets f1 cars apart from any other motorsport on the planet is their ability to corner at high speeds. To be honest, the only reason motogp loses to f1 IS because of corners...
Bahamuttiamat 6 months ago
@Bahamuttiamat no its on braking mainly
mark675 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Bahamuttiamat no, its on braking mainly
mark675 5 months ago
Respond to this video... what the fuck gp bikes weigh 130kg u twat
lukezapper 6 months ago
@lukezapper If F1 is crap why does it have such an enormous amount of fans?
CdrJamesCool 6 months ago
@CdrJamesCool thats coz people like and so have gp fans theres loads there was acctully more motogp fan at catalunya gp than there was when the f1 was there O_o
lukezapper 6 months ago
@CdrJamesCool and plus its more intresting coz bikes r soo small and they r incredibly fragile and so r f1 cars but bikes can go faster (in strait line) and the engine is only a 800cc thats less than a liter next year there goin back to the big monsters 1000cc then f1 car will be left for dead on the strait dont stand a chance and i think its stupid f1 coz it seems they are making it worse they have taken the fuel system away now thats got to be boring and 2 the amount of laps 70laps TO MANY!!
lukezapper 6 months ago
@lukezapper Actually, there is a video where an F1 car goes 256 mph, faster than the bugatti. Look for the video here on youtube by typing "formula 1 256 mph."
anastasia60559 4 months ago
@anastasia60559 its cheatin though coz if u take the wing off it goes like well fast because of the flow over the car so it does not count as a speed record mate yeh it is very very very fast but in a GP u dont see them with out wings :/ coz they need to go round corners :) but f1 cars today like 2011 are slower than old f1 cars arnt they coz the fastest ive seen them go this year is 339kph and that is slower coz i remeber they could do 220mph (362kph) in 2005 shame they got rid of v10s bastard
lukezapper 4 months ago
@lukezapper i only bothered to read the fact you think f1 cars will go faster without aerodynamics.. f1 cars make fuckall mechanical grip (compared to requirements of putting down the power), they are tuned for aerodynamic grip with minimum drag. Take the wing off an f1 car that weights almost nothing and the fucker will spin its wheels in the high gears. Plus the front wing reduces drag by flowing air over the cars more evenly whilst also making grip. yeah mate it is a shame about the v10's aye
fergus1494 4 months ago
@fergus1494 yeeh anyway i like both of them great motorsports but i will admit f1 is the bench mark in saftey and i think motorsports learnt i lesson this week as motogp lost a great Simioncelli and not forgetting dan weldon 2 great talent people lost but i have to be honest indy car is way not safe the speed they go 235mph and its saftey is crap am sorry but motorsports need to keep up to date otherwise it will be to safe and the engines and cars will be so small to make it safer :/
lukezapper 4 months ago
@anastasia60559 i still carnt belive how fast Top Fuel Dragsters go in NHRA FUCKIN HELL! fastest speed is over 340 to 350mph :O and it will do 0-112mph in 0.800 of a second! and a qutar of a mile in 3.7 seconds
lukezapper 4 months ago